|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Volume 7, no. 5, p. 848–858, 2008. Pages 856 and 857: The authors retract Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 from the original version of the article because the same pictures of some of the plates with negative results were mistakenly used at several distinct places in the figures. The correct versions of these figures and their legends are provided below. The conclusions of the paper remain the same.