PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biochem Cell Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 30.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2861867
NIHMSID: NIHMS193797

Does BLM helicase unwind nucleosomal DNA?

Abstract

RecQ helicases maintain chromosome stability by resolving several highly specific DNA structures. BLM, the protein mutated in Bloom’s syndrome, is a member of the RecQ helicase family, and possesses both DNA-unwinding and strand-annealing activity. In this study, we have investigated the unwinding activity of BLM on nucleosomal DNA, the natural nuclear substrate for the enzyme. We generated a DNA template including a strong nucleosome positioning sequence flanked by forked DNA, which is reportedly one of the preferred DNA substrates for BLM. BLM did not possess detectable unwinding activity toward the forked DNA substrate. However, the truncated BLM, lacking annealing activity, unwound it partially. In the presence of the single strand DNA binding protein RPA, the unwinding activity of both the full-length and the truncated BLMs was promoted. Next, the histone octamer was reconstituted onto the forked DNA to generate a ‘forked mononucleosome’. BLM did not unwind the nucleosomal DNA but the truncated BLM unwound it partially. The unwinding activity for the mononucleosome was not promoted dramatically with RPA. These results indicate that full length BLM may require additional factors to unwind nucleosomal DNA in vivo, and that RPA is, on its own, unable to perform this auxiliary function.

Keywords: BLM, DNA helicase, nucleosome

Introduction

Bloom’s syndrome is a human autosomal recessive disorder with increased incidence of cancer (Ellis and German 1996). Cells from patients with Bloom’s syndrome display a high degree of genome instability and a drastic increase in the frequency of sister chromatid exchanges mediated by homologous recombination (Ellis et al. 1995a; Singh et al. 2009).

The gene (BLM) defective in Bloom’s syndrome encodes for one of the five members of the RecQ family of DNA helicases in humans (Ellis et al. 1995b). The RecQ family includes the WRN and RECQ4 proteins defective in Werner’s and Rothmund-Thomson syndromes, respectively (Yu et al. 1996; Kitao et al. 1999). The RecQ family is defined by the presence of a helicase domain, which is a highly conserved amino acid sequence motif in the middle of the polypeptide chain. Most RecQ helicases have two additional characteristic domains C-terminal to the helicase domain, RecQ-Ct (RecQ C-terminal) domain and HRDC (helicase RNaseD C-terminal) domain. The RecQ-Ct domain is implicated in the structural stability of the protein and participates in protein-protein and DNA structure-specific binding via a zinc-binding motif and a winged-helix domain (Killoran and Keck 2006). The HRDC domain is thought to participate in structure-specific DNA binding (Killoran and Keck 2006). Outside of these domains, there is little sequence homology among family members (Bachrati and Hickson 2003). BLM unwinds DNA with a 3’ to 5’ polarity and possesses strong DNA substrate specificity, preferring unusual DNA structures such as forks, bubbles, D-loops, Holliday junctions, and G-quadruplexes (Karow et al.1997; Sun et al. 1998; van Brabant et al. 2000; Mohaghegh et al. 2001).

The monomer of BLM protein comprises 1417 amino acid residues, with predicted molecular mass of 159 kDa (Ellis et al. 1995b). Size-exclusion chromatography and electron-microscopic studies indicate a native molecular mass of ~700–900 kDa and tetrameric or hexameric ring structures (Karow et al. 1999). The RecQ core of BLM, which contains the helicase domain, the RecQ-Ct domain, and the HRDC domain, has unwinding activity in a monomeric form, indicating that the oligomeric structure is not necessary for the unwinding activity (Janscak et al 2003). Recently, BLM has been shown to possess strand-annealing activity (Cheok et al. 2005; Machwe et al. 2005).

Nuclear DNA in eukaryotes is organized as chromatin, a complex between DNA and small, highly basic proteins, histones (van Holde 1988; Zlatanova and Leuba 2004). The basic repeating structural unit of chromatin is the nucleosome which encompasses the nucleosome core particle (NCP) and the DNA linking consecutive nucleosomes in the chromatin fiber (Zlatanova et al. 1998). The NCP contains 147 bp of DNA wrapped in a left-handed (negative) sense around a histone octamer consisting of two molecules each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 (Arents and Moudrianakis 1993; Luger et al. 1997; van Holde and Zlatanova 1999; Harp et al. 2000). The octamer is a modular structure possessing two-fold symmetry: the H3/H4 tetramer is at the center, with the two H2A/H2B dimers attached on either side. The tetramer organizes the central portion of nucleosomal DNA, whereas each H2A/H2B dimer contacts ~30 bp on either side. All DNA transactions in the nucleus - DNA replication, recombination, repair, and transcription - take place in the context of chromatin. How all these processes deal with the existence of nucleosomes along the DNA is still unclear. It is obvious that for the majority of these processes, DNA has to be freed of nucleosomes (at least temporarily), so as to release the DNA in a state that can be denatured, thus providing template access by the respective cellular machineries. Helicases are involved in many of these processes, but we still do not known whether and how they unwind nucleosomal DNA. Several DNA helicases have been shown to detach bound proteins during DNA unwinding (Mackintosh and Raney 2006), but whether they can disrupt the stable, highly organized structure of the nucleosome particle remains unclear. Only a few reports have addressed these questions, but they have studied either non-homologous systems, or helicases that only work under limited cellular circumstances (see Discussion).

The nucleosomal DNA unwinding by BLM must occur at the initial steps of events (e.g. recombination repair), because at the later steps, the DNA stretches involved might have been freed of bound proteins or covered with some different proteins, such as Rad51. Recently, it has been reported that BLM contributes not only to the late phases of recombinational DNA repair but also to the initiation of the process by human exonuclease 1 (hExo1) (Gravel et al. 2008; Nimonkar et al. 2008). So, the BLM unwinding activity on the nucleosomal DNA might be important in the initiation of DNA repair in nucleosomal DNA. We expect that BLM encounters nucleosomes in many other processes. In this study, we have analyzed the unwinding of nucleosomal DNA by BLM helicase.

Materials and Methods

Protein Expression and Purification

C-terminally His6-tagged BLM was expressed from pJK1 (gift from Dr. Ian Hickson) using the yeast galactose-inducible BLM expression system and purified using Ni-NTA Agarose (QIAGEN) according to Karow et al. (Karow et al. 1997). RecQ core fragment encompassing amino acid residues 642–1290 (BLM642–1290) was overexpressed from pJP71 (gift from Dr. Pavel Janscak) in BL21 codon-plus cells using the CBP system (Janscak et al. 2003) and purified using chitin beads (New England BioLabs) and SP Sepharose. All three subunits of hRPA were co-expressed from p11d-tRPA (gift from Dr. Marc Wold) in BL21 codon-plus cells and purified using sequentially Affi-Gel® Blue Gel (BioRad), hydroxyapatite gel, and Q Sepharose chromatography, as described previously (Henricksen et al. 1994).

DNA substrates

All oligonucleotides used for the preparation of DNA substrates were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc (Coralville, IA). The nucleotide sequences used in this study were as follows:

  • 50-F1, CGAAGGTTCG TGTTCATCCT CACACTCACT TAAGCCGAAT TCTTAGGGTT;
  • 50-F2, GCTATCGTAC ATGATATCCT CACACTCTGA ATAGCCGAAT TCTTAGGGTT;
  • 50-R, biotin-AACCCTAAGA ATTCGGCTTA AGTGAGTGTG AGGATATCAT GTACGATAGC;
  • 27lag, GAGTGTGAGG ATATCATGTA CGATAGC;
  • 27lead, GCTATCGTAC ATGATATCCT CACACTC (Machwe et al. 2006);
  • 208-FT, TTTTTTTTTT TTTTTCGGGG AATTCGGTAT TCCCAGG;
  • 208-FA, AAAAAAAAAA AAAAACGGGG AATTCGGTAT TCCCAGG;
  • 208-R, biotin-AATTCCAACG AATAACTTCC AGG.

For the 18 bp replication fork mimic, the biotin-labeled 50-R and 27lead, and the 50-F2 and 27lag are incubated pair-wise at 95°C for 5 min, followed by a 15 min incubation at 65°C and an hour incubation at 37°C; then the two annealed pairs were mixed and incubated at 25°C for 12–18 h. For the 35 bp forked-DNA, the biotin-labeled 50-R and 50-F1 were incubated at 95°C for 5 min, followed by a 15 min incubation at 65°C and an hour incubation at 37°C. For the nucleosomal DNA, a 208 bp nucleosome positioning sequence from 5S rDNA of sea urchin was used for the template (Simpson et al. 1985). Two types of DNA were amplified using 208-FT-208-R, and 208-FA-208-R to generate dT15-208 and dA15-208. The non-biotinylated strand of dT15-208 and biotinylated strand of dA15-208 are purified using Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin (Invitrogen, Dynal AS, Oslo, Norway) as described previously (Jenne and Famulok 1999). The two ssDNAs were mixed in an equal proportion and were incubated at 95°C for 5 min, followed by a gradual (1°C/min) decrease to 37°C to generate dT15 forked-DNA. Nucleosome core histones were prepared from chicken erythrocytes (Tomschik et al. 2001) and reconstituted onto the forked-DNA by the salt stepping method as previously described (Tomschik et al. 2005).

Helicase Assay

For naked DNA, helicase assays were carried out in a 10 µl reaction volume containing reaction buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 4 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 1 mM dithiothreitol), 0.5 nM biotin-labeled DNA substrates, and 24 nM BLM protein, unless indicated otherwise. After incubating at 37°C for 30 min, the reaction was stopped by adding 1/10 volume of helicase stop buffer (10 mg/ml proteinase K, 40% sucrose, 100 mM EDTA, 2% SDS, and 0.2% bromophenol blue). The reaction mixtures were resolved by electrophoresis in 10% or 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels. The DNA was electro-transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond™-N+, GE Healthcare). After blocking in 1% Blocking Reagent (Roche), the membranes were incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (1:5000 dilution, GE Healthcare) in maleic acid buffer at 25°C for 1 h. The biotin-labeled DNAs were visualized using SuperSignal® West Femto (Pierce). For reconstituted DNA, MspI digestion at 37°C for 1 hr was carried out before helicase reaction.

Annealing Assay

Strand-annealing activity of BLM or BLM642–1290 was measured in the above reaction buffer without ATP for 20 min at 37°C using biotin-labeled 50-R and unlabeled 50-F2 oligonucleotides. The reaction was stopped by adding 1/10 volume of the stop buffer (40% Ficoll, 50 mM EDTA, 2% SDS, and 0.2% bromophenol blue) and analyzed as above.

Results

Unwinding Activity of Recombinant BLM and its Truncated Version on Naked DNA Substrates

It has been reported that full length BLM cannot unwind the ~200 bp DNA, which is required for nucleosome formation, without additional proteins (Brosh et al 2000). So, full length BLM helicase, its RecQ core fragment (BLM642–1290, lacking the annealing activity), and single strand DNA binding protein RPA (that promotes the unwinding activity) were purified. The recombinant proteins used in this study were analyzed by gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1A). It is well known that BLM helicase has preference for unusual DNA structures (Karow et al.1997; Sun et al. 1998; van Brabant et al. 2000; Mohaghegh et al. 2001). To verify whether our recombinant proteins were enzymatically active, we tested their unwinding activities on a 18 bp replication fork mimic and 35 bp forked DNA. The 18 bp replication fork mimic DNA substrate contains a 18 bp-long parental region, 5 nt non-complementary sequence, and two homologous 27 bp parental-daughter arms (Fig. 1B). The 35 bp forked DNA substrate contains a 35 bp-long double stranded DNA and 15 nt forked structure (Fig. 1C). To trace the DNA products, both DNA contained a biotin label at the 5’ end of the 50-R strand. The forked DNA was treated with BLM proteins, in the presence of ATP with or without RPA (Fig. 1B and C). Notably, full length BLM did not unwind this structure completely, whereas BLM642–1290 unwound it completely. As expected, RPA promoted the BLM unwinding activity. The difference between the two BLM forms is obviously due to the presence (in full-length BLM) or absence (in BLM642–1290) of strand-annealing activities (Figs. 1B and D). Thus, the degree of unwinding observed with full length BLM reflects the equilibrium between unwinding and re-annealing. Thus, our recombinant proteins are enzymatically active and show the expected behavior.

Fig. 1
Purification of full-length and truncated versions of recombinant human BLM and RPA, and verification of their enzymatic activity. (A) Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel of purified BLM, BLM642–1290, and RPA. The recombinant proteins ...

RecQ Core Fragment of BLM Unwinds Nucleosomal DNA

To compare the BLM helicase activity on naked and nucleosomal DNA, we constructed a biotin-labeled forked DNA substrate that contains a strong nucleosome positioning signal, the 208 bp fragment from the 5S rRNA gene from sea urchin (Fig. 2A, see Materials and Methods). When reconstituted with histone octamers, this DNA construct places a single nucleosome over the positioning sequence, leaving the forked structure free for BLM landing. For the nucleosome substrate, the histone octamer was reconstituted onto the DNA to generate the forked-mononucleosome (Fig. 2A). The reconstitution product, obtained with an optimized histone/DNA ratio, was analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2B). As is usual with in vitro nucleosome reconstitution protocols, there is always some residual free DNA (this free DNA disappears when higher histone/DNA ratios are used; using such high ratios is, however, undesirable, since they give rise to massive aggregation of the reconstituted material). To distinguish the contaminating naked DNA from the reconstituted fraction to be used in the helicase reaction, the reconstitution mixture was pretreated with MspI, which cuts in the center of the nucleosome positioning sequence (Fig. 3, lane 8–14). Nucleosome-organized DNA is protected from the restriction enzyme. In this gel, the ssDNA runs more slowly as compared to the forked-DNA (Fig. 3, lanes 1–2 and 8–9). As shown in Fig. 3, full length BLM could not unwind the naked forked-DNA (~200 bp) (Fig. 3, lane 3). No unwinding of the forked-DNA substrate was observed upon raising the enzyme concentration from 2.4 nM to 72 nM (data not shown). These results were not unexpected in view of the relatively low processivity of the enzyme on partial duplex substrates (Brosh et al. 2000). BLM could not unwind the forked-mononucleosome either (Fig. 3, lane 10). Truncated BLM642–1290 did produce ssDNA (Fig. 3, lanes 6–7), indicating its ability to partially unwind the forked-DNA. BLM642–1290 also partially unwound the forked-mononucleosomal DNA (Fig. 3, lanes 11–14). BLM642–1290 also unwound MspI-digested residual naked DNA present in the forked-nucleosome preparation (Fig. 3, lane 14). Increasing the concentration of BLM642–1290 from 7.2 nM to 72 nM led to an increase in the amount of unwound DNA on both the naked and the mononucleosomal DNA substrates.

Fig. 2
Forked-mononucleosome. (A) Schematic representation of the forked-DNA and the generation of the forked-mononucleosome. (B) PAGE analysis of the reaction mixture used for reconstitution of nucleosome onto the forked-DNA.
Fig. 3
BLM helicase activity for nucleosomal DNA. 0.5 nM of forked-DNA (lanes 1–7) or forked-mononucleosome (lanes 8–14) were used as a substrate in helicase (full length BLM or BLM642–1290) reactions. Before use as a helicase substrate, ...

RPA does not Dramatically Alter the BLM Unwinding Activity for Nucleosomal DNA

Next, we tested whether the ssDNA binding protein RPA promotes BLM unwinding activity for nucleosomal DNA; it is well known that RPA interacts with and stimulates BLM unwinding activity on naked DNA substrates (Brosh et al. 2000). RPA was added before BLM helicase reactions. The concentration of RPA (200 nM) used in these experiments did not promote DNA unwinding on its own (Fig. 4A, lanes 2–3, 9–10). Of note, somewhat higher concentrations of RPA have been shown to ‘unwind’ dsDNA, in a non-enzymatic reaction, presumably involving binding to and stabilization of ssDNA created as a result of ‘breathing’ motions in double helical DNA (Treuner et al. 1996).

Fig. 4
Lack of RPA promoting activity of BLM helicase on nucleosomal DNA. (A) 0.5 nM of forked-DNA (lanes 1–7) or forked-mononucleosome (lanes 8–14) were used as a substrate in helicase reactions in the absence (lane 2, 4, 6, 9, 11 and 13) or ...

On the forked-DNA substrate, RPA promoted the unwinding activity of both full length BLM and BLM642–1290 (Fig. 4A, compare lanes 4 with 5, and lanes 6 with 7). In both cases the presence of RPA significantly increased the amount of the ssDNA product. In contrast, RPA did not promote the unwinding activity of either enzyme on the forked-nucleosome (Fig. 4A, lanes 11–14). Full length BLM could not unwind the nucleosomal DNA, with or without RPA. Truncated BLM642–1290, on the other hand, partially unwound nucleosomal DNA; however, no significant contribution from RPA was evident (Fig. 4A, lanes 13 and 14, and Fig. 4B).

Discussion

Our results show that the RecQ core of the human RecQ subfamily DNA helicase BLM can unwind nucleosomal DNA. However, under the in vitro reaction conditions used in this study, full length BLM could not unwind DNA packaged into a nucleosome.

Many nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-dependent enzymes are part of multisubunit protein complexes that alter chromatin structure for processes such as transcription to occur (Saha et al. 2006). The mechanisms of action of these so-called chromatin (or nucleosome) remodelers still remain poorly understood, but it is generally believed that they change nucleosome positioning and structure through the ability of their ATP-dependent subunits to translocate along dsDNA (Flaus and Owen-Hughes 2004). Interestingly, some chromatin remodeling translocases such as SWI/SNF belong to Super family II (SF-II) helicases (Berger 2008). Note, however, that although they possess canonical helicase domains, they seem to be devoid of helicase activity.

Several bona fide helicases (RecBCD, an SF-I helicase and SV40 large T antigen, an SF-III helicase) have been shown to have unwinding activities on nucleosomal DNA (Eggleston et al. 1995; Ramsperger and Stahl 1995). We note, however, that the RecBCD helicase is of prokaryotic origin and it does not encounter nucleosomes in it natural environment. The SV40 T antigen also functions under special circumstances (only in virally infected cells). Recently, the human MCM4/6/7 helicase (an SF-VI helicase that participates in replication) was reported to unwind nucleosomal DNA, only in collaboration with the FACT complex (Tan et al. 2006). Here we demonstrate that the RecQ core of BLM (an SF-II helicase) can also unwind nucleosomal DNA. We expect that the observed behavior is not confined to the specific sequence used for nucleosome reconstitution, since this is a naturally-occurring sequence that possesses a well-defined nucleosome positioning signal (places the histone octamer at one major position on the DNA fragment). The positioning strength is directly related to the affinity of the octamer to the respective sequence (Lowary and Widom, 1998; Thåström et al. 1999); thus, it is expected that less-well positioning sequences would be easier to unwind. Based on previous reports and our data we suggest that most helicases possess nucleosomal DNA unwinding activity.

It is important to note that full length BLM could not unwind nucleosomal DNA under the conditions of our assay, independently of whether RPA, a “helper” protein for helicase action on naked DNA substrates, was present or not. This may indicate that the portions of the molecule that are exterior to the RecQ core (these domains are responsible for DNA annealing, protein binding, and BLM oligomerization) inhibit the structural transitions in the nucleosome particle that make DNA unwinding possible. At present, it is unclear what these structural transitions may be. In principle, one can envisage either a total displacement of the histone core of the nucleosome, or partial histone dissociation from portions of nucleosomal DNA, unwinding of the free portion, and reattachment of the histones [one must note that such scenarios have been envisioned for the process of transcription, e.g. van Holde et al. (1992)]. This second mechanism though will not lead to the release of ssDNA molecules that we observe in our assay. Thus, the present data favor the first mechanism, i.e. total histone dissociation.

Finally, it is important to note that the inhibition of nucleosomal DNA unwinding observed with the full length BLM could not be overcome by RPA; RPA could not enhance the unwinding activity of the truncated protein either. While the RecQ core of the enzyme is active on nucleosomal DNA on its own, full-length BLM (the physiologically-relevant enzyme) may need the assistance of other, yet unidentified, proteins.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Ian Hickson, Pavel Janscak, and Marc Wold for the BLM, BLM642–1290, and RPA expression plasmids, respectively. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01-GM077872-01) and National Science Foundation (0504239).

References

  • Arents G, Moudrianakis EN. Topography of the histone octamer surface: repeating structural motifs utilized in the docking of nucleosomal DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993;90:10489–10493. [PubMed]
  • Bachrati CZ, Hickson ID. RecQ helicases: suppressors of tumorigenesis and premature aging. Biochem. J. 2003;374:577–606. [PubMed]
  • Berger JM. SnapShot: nucleic acid helicases and translocases. Cell. 2008;134:888. [PubMed]
  • Brosh RM, Jr, Li JL, Kenny MK, Karow JK, Cooper MP, Kureekattil RP, Hickson ID, Bohr VA. Replication protein A physically interacts with the Bloom's syndrome protein and stimulates its helicase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:23500–23508. [PubMed]
  • Cheok CF, Wu L, Garcia PL, Janscak P, Hickson ID. The Bloom's syndrome helicase promotes the annealing of complementary single-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:3932–3941. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Eggleston AK, O'Neill TE, Bradbury EM, Kowalczykowski SC. Unwinding of nucleosomal DNA by a DNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:2024–2031. [PubMed]
  • Ellis NA, German J. Molecular genetics of Bloom's syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1996;5:1457–1463. [PubMed]
  • Ellis NA, Lennon DJ, Proytcheva M, Alhadeff B, Henderson EE, German J. Somatic intragenic recombination within the mutated locus BLM can correct the high sister-chromatid exchange phenotype of Bloom syndrome cells. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1995a;57:1019–1027. [PubMed]
  • Ellis NA, Groden J, Ye TZ, Straughen J, Lennon DJ, Ciocci S, Proytcheva M, German J. The Bloom's syndrome gene product is homologous to RecQ helicases. Cell. 1995b;83:655–666. [PubMed]
  • Flaus A, Owen-Hughes T. Mechanisms for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling: farewell to the tuna-can octamer? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2004;14:165–173. [PubMed]
  • Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2767–2772. [PubMed]
  • Harp JM, Hanson BL, Timm DE, Bunick GJ. Asymmetries in the nucleosome core particle at 2.5 A resolution. Acta. Crystallogr D Biol. Crystallogr. 2000;56:1513–1534. [PubMed]
  • Henricksen LA, Umbricht CB, Wold MS. Recombinant replication protein A: expression, complex formation, and functional characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:11121–11132. [PubMed]
  • Janscak P, Garcia PL, Hamburger F, Makuta Y, Shiraishi K, Imai Y, Ikeda H, Bickle TA. Characterization and mutational analysis of the RecQ core of the bloom syndrome protein. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;330:29–42. [PubMed]
  • Jenne A, Famulok M. Disruption of the streptavidin interaction with biotinylated nucleic acid probes by 2-mercaptoethanol. Biotechniques. 1999;26:249–252. 254. [PubMed]
  • Karow JK, Chakraverty RK, Hickson ID. The Bloom's syndrome gene product is a 3'–5' DNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:30611–30614. [PubMed]
  • Karow JK, Newman RH, Freemont PS, Hickson ID. Oligomeric ring structure of the Bloom's syndrome helicase. Curr. Biol. 1999;9:597–600. [PubMed]
  • Killoran MP, Keck JL. Sit down, relax and unwind: structural insights into RecQ helicase mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:4098–4105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kitao S, Shimamoto A, Goto M, Miller RW, Smithson WA, Lindor NM, Furuichi Y. Mutations in RECQL4 cause a subset of cases of Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. Nat. Genet. 1999;22:82–84. [PubMed]
  • Lowary PT, Widom J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 1998;276:19–42. [PubMed]
  • Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997;389:251–260. [PubMed]
  • Machwe A, Xiao L, Groden J, Matson SW, Orren DK. RecQ family members combine strand pairing and unwinding activities to catalyze strand exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:23397–23407. [PubMed]
  • Machwe A, Xiao L, Groden J, Orren DK. The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins catalyze regression of a model replication fork. Biochemistry. 2006;45:13939–13946. [PubMed]
  • Mackintosh SG, Raney KD. DNA unwinding and protein displacement by superfamily 1 and superfamily 2 helicases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:4154–4159. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mohaghegh P, Karow JK, Brosh RM, Jr, Bohr VA, Hickson ID. The Bloom's and Werner's syndrome proteins are DNA structure-specific helicases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2843–2849. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nimonkar AV, Ozsoy AZ, Genschel J, Modrich P, Kowalczykowski SC. Human exonuclease 1 and BLM helicase interact to resect DNA and initiate DNA repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105:16906–16911. [PubMed]
  • Ramsperger U, Stahl H. Unwinding of chromatin by the SV40 large T antigen DNA helicase. EMBO J. 1995;14:3215–3225. [PubMed]
  • Saha A, Wittmeyer J, Cairns BR. Chromatin remodelling: the industrial revolution of DNA around histones. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7:437–447. [PubMed]
  • Simpson RT, Thoma F, Brubaker JM. Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell. 1985;42:799–808. [PubMed]
  • Singh DK, Ahn B, Bohr VA. Roles of RecQ helicases in recombination based DNA repair, genomic stability and aging. Biogerontology. 2009;10:235–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sun H, Karow JK, Hickson ID, Maizels N. The Bloom's syndrome helicase unwinds G4 DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:27587–27592. [PubMed]
  • Tan BC, Chien CT, Hirose S, Lee SC. Functional cooperation between FACT and MCM helicase facilitates initiation of chromatin DNA replication. EMBO J. 2006;25:3975–3985. [PubMed]
  • Thåström A, Lowary PT, Widlund HR, Cao H, Kubista M, Widom J. Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences. J Mol. Biol. 1999;288:213–229. [PubMed]
  • Tomschik M, Karymov MA, Zlatanova J, Leuba SH. The archaeal histone-fold protein HMf organizes DNA into bona fide chromatin fibers. Structure. 2001;9:1201–1211. [PubMed]
  • Tomschik M, Zheng H, van Holde K, Zlatanova J, Leuba SH. Fast, long-range, reversible conformational fluctuations in nucleosomes revealed by single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:3278–3283. [PubMed]
  • Treuner K, Ramsperger U, Knippers R. Replication protein A induces the unwinding of long double-stranded DNA regions. J. Mol. Biol. 1996;259:104–112. [PubMed]
  • van Brabant AJ, Ye T, Sanz M, German IJ, Ellis NA, Holloman WK. Binding and melting of D-loops by the Bloom syndrome helicase. Biochemistry. 2000;39:14617–14625. [PubMed]
  • van Holde KE. Chromatin. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 1988.
  • van Holde K, Zlatanova J. The nucleosome core particle: does it have structural and physiologic relevance? Bioessays. 1999;21:776–780. [PubMed]
  • van Holde KE, Lohr DE, Robert C. What happens to nucleosomes during transcription? J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:2837–2840. [PubMed]
  • Yu CE, Oshima J, Fu YH, Wijsman EM, Hisama F, Alisch R, Matthews S, Nakura J, Miki T, Ouais S, Martin GM, Mulligan J, Schellenberg GD. Positional cloning of the Werner's syndrome gene. Science. 1996;272:258–262. [PubMed]
  • Zlatanova J, Leuba SH. Chromatin Structure and Dynamics: State-of-the-Art. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004.
  • Zlatanova J, Leuba SH, van Holde K. Chromatin fiber structure: morphology, molecular determinants, structural transitions. Biophys. J. 1998;74:2554–2566. [PubMed]