PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Psychol Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2861779
NIHMSID: NIHMS196280

Eavesdropping on Happiness: Well-being is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations

Matthias R. Mehl and Simine Vazire
Matthias R. Mehl, University of Arizona;

Eavesdropping on Happiness: Well-being is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations

Is the happy life full of shallow, happy-go-lucky moments and trivial small talk or full of reflection and profound social encounters? Both notions exist – the happy ignoramus and the fulfilled deep thinker – but little is known about which everyday life is actually associated with greater happiness (King & Napa, 1998). We report findings from a naturalistic observation study that investigated whether happy and unhappy people differ in the amount of small talk and substantive conversations they have.

Although the macro-level and long-term implications of happiness have been extensively studied (Eid & Larsen, 2008; Howell & Howell, 2008), little is known about the daily social behavior of happy people, primarily due to the difficulty of objectively measuring everyday behavior. Many behavioral measures (e.g., experience sampling, day reconstruction method) rely on self-reports and so cannot disentangle true associations between happiness and behavior from biases or idealized self-views. This is especially true for evaluatively-loaded behaviors such as the substance, or lack thereof, of one's conversations. To address this difficulty, we used the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR; Mehl, Pennebaker, Crow, Dabbs, & Price, 2001), a digital audio recorder that unobtrusively tracks real-world behavior by periodically recording snippets of ambient sounds while participants go about their daily lives.

Methods

Seventy-nine undergraduates (47 females) wore the EAR for four days (Vazire & Mehl, 2008). The EAR recorded for 30 seconds every 12.5 minutes, providing 23,689 waking recordings (M = 300 per participant). For each recording, coders identified whether a participant was alone, talking with others, and whether a conversation was small talk or substantive. Small talk was defined as an uninvolved conversation of a banal nature (i.e., only trivial information is exchanged; e.g., “What do you have there? Popcorn? Yummy!”). A substantive conversation was defined as an involved conversation of a substantive nature (i.e., meaningful information is exchanged; e.g., “She fell in love with your dad? So, did they get divorced soon after?”). See Table 1 for reliabilities.

Table 1
EAR-derived daily interaction variables: Reliabilities and correlations with well-being

The EAR codings were converted into relative frequencies (i.e., percentage of waking recordings in which a category applied). To account for differences in number of conversations, we also computed the percentage of conversations that were small talk or substantive. Across all participants, 17.9% (SD = 15.4%) of conversations were small talk and 35.5% (SD = 24.7%) were substantive. Substantive conversations were significantly related to time spent socializing (r = .38), eating (r = .33), and watching TV (r = -.22). Small talk was unrelated to all standard EAR activity categories.

We assessed well-being with several methods. Participants completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen & Griffin, 1985; α=.93) and the single-item happiness measure “I see myself as someone who is happy, satisfied with life” twice three weeks apart. The single-item self-report of happiness was combined with 2-3 informant-reports on the same measure (α=.80). To obtain a multi-method well-being index, we combined the self- and informant-based happiness measure with participants’ self-reported life satisfaction.

To obtain a multi-method measure of personality, we averaged two self-reports (three weeks apart) and 2-3 informant-reports on the Big Five Inventory (John & Srivastava, 1999; αs≥.92).

Results and Discussion

Consistent with prior research (Diener & Seligman, 2002), higher well-being was associated with spending less time alone, r = -.35, and more time talking to others, r = .31. Further, higher well-being was associated with having less small talk, r = -.33, and more substantive conversations, r = .28. To illustrate the magnitude of these effects, compared to the unhappiest participants (-2.0 SD) the happiest participants (+1.5 SD) spent 25% less time alone (58.6% vs. 76.8%) and 70% more time talking (39.7% vs. 23.2%). They also had roughly one third as much small talk (10.2% vs. 28.3%) and twice as many substantive conversations (45.9% vs. 21.8%; Figure S1). The effects for the well-being index were comparable to those for the life satisfaction and happiness measures separately and emerged for weekdays and the weekend (Table 1).

To test whether personality differences accounted for these effects, we residualized the well-being index for participants’ scores on all Big Five dimensions (Steel, Schmidt & Shultz, 2008). Using this residualized well-being index, the effects for time spent alone, talking to others and substantive conversations were basically unaffected and the effects for small talk were diminished (Table 1). These analyses indicate that participants who were happier than one would predict from their personality had more, and more substantive, conversations.

Together, the findings demonstrate that the happy life is social rather than solitary and conversationally deep rather than superficial. What makes these findings especially compelling is the lack of method overlap between the well-being measures (self- and informant-reports) and the interaction measures (direct observation). Also, the replication of findings across measures of well-being and across weekday and weekend behavior is encouraging.

Naturally, our correlational findings are causally ambiguous. On one hand, well-being may be causally antecedent to having substantive interactions. Happy people may be “social attractors” that facilitate deeper social encounters (Lucas & Dyrenforth, 2006). On the other hand, deep conversations may actually make people happier. Just like self-disclosure can instill a sense of intimacy in a relationship, deep conversations may instill a sense of meaning in the interaction partners. Therefore, our results raise the interesting possibility that happiness can be increased by facilitating substantive conversations (Sheldon & Lyubomirsky, 2006). Future research should examine this possibility experimentally.

Remarking on Socrates’ dictum, “the unexamined life is not worth living,” Daniel Dennett wrote, “the overly examined life is nothing to write home about either.” (1984, p. 87). While we hesitate to enter such delicate philosophical disputes, our findings suggest that people find their lives more worth living when examined--at least when examined together.

Supplementary Material

1

Figure S1. Scatterplots and linear trends for the association between participants’ well-being and aspects of their daily interactions; Panel A: Percentage of time per day spent alone and talking to others; Panel B: Percentage of conversations that were small-talk and substantive conversations.

Contributor Information

Matthias R. Mehl, University of Arizona.

Simine Vazire, Washington University at St. Louis.

References

  • Dennett DC. Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. The MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 1984.
  • Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1985;49:1. [PubMed]
  • Diener E, Seligman MEP. Very happy people. Psychological Science. 2002;13:80–83. [PubMed]
  • Eid M, Larsen R, editors. The science of subjective well-being. Guilford; New York: 2008.
  • Howell RT, Howell CJ. The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2008;134:536–560. [PubMed]
  • John OP, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA, John OP, editors. Handbook of personality theory and research. Guilford Press; New York: 1999. pp. 102–138.
  • King LA, Napa CK. What makes a life good? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75:156–165. [PubMed]
  • Lucas RE, Dyrenforth PS. Does the existence of social relationships matter for subjective well-being? In: Vohs KD, Finkel EJ, editors. Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. Guilford Press; New York: 2006. pp. 254–273.
  • Mehl MR, Pennebaker JW, Crow M, Dabbs J, Price J. The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 2001;33:517–523. [PubMed]
  • Sheldon KM, Lyubomirsky S. Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: Change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2006;7:55–86.
  • Steel P, Schmidt J, Shultz J. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin. 2008;134:138–161. [PubMed]
  • Vazire S, Mehl MR. Knowing me, knowing you: The relative accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;95:1202–1216. [PubMed]