PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr Opin Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 29.
Published in final edited form as:
Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2010 April; 12(2): 214–222.
PMCID: PMC2861437
NIHMSID: NIHMS195819

Transcriptional gene silencing mediated by non-coding RNAs

Abstract

Chromatin remodelling guided by non-coding RNA (ncRNA) contributes mechanistically to the establishment of chromatin structure and to the maintenance of epigenetic memory. Various ncRNAs have been identified as regulators of chromatin structure and gene expression. The widespread occurrence of antisense transcription in eukaryotes emphasizes the prevalence of gene regulation by natural antisense transcripts. Recently, antisense ncRNAs have been implicated in the silencing of tumor suppressor genes through epigenetic remodeling events. Characterization of the antisense RNAs involved in the development or maintenance of oncogenic states may define ncRNAs as early biomarkers for the emergence of cancer, and could have a significant impact on the development of tools for disease diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current knowledge on the mechanisms of ncRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing in humans is discussed, and parallels between the establishment of a silent chromatin state mediated by siRNAs and long antisense ncRNAs are highlighted.

Keywords: Antisense transcription, chromatin, epigenetic, non-coding RNA, siRNA, transcriptional gene silencing

Introduction

Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) mediated by the siRNA pathway has been well described in the single-cell organisms Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Tetrahymena thermophila, as well as in the more complex organisms Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans [1,2]. Small RNA-directed TGS has also been observed in human cells following the exogenous delivery of siRNAs targeted to gene promoters [3]. Additional evidence has emerged in recent years that suggests an endogenous RNA-mediated TGS mechanism exists in the nucleus of mammalian cells, acting through long antisense non-coding RNA (ncRNA) transcripts [46]. Studies that have investigated transcriptional activity throughout the mammalian genome, predominantly from regions with low or no protein-coding potential [717], have revealed an unexpected level of complexity in the mammalian transcriptome. The regulatory potential of non-coding transcription is only beginning to be dissected on a case-by-case basis. In this review, parallels and potential interrelations are discussed between TGS of human genes triggered by exogenously delivered siRNAs, TGS of tumor suppressors triggered by long antisense ncRNAs, and developmentally regulated genome-wide programming by the Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins. These three seemingly distinct phenomena have the underlying common theme of ‘ncRNA-mediated TGS’.

Mechanism of siRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing

Promoter-targeted siRNAs have been demonstrated to inhibit the transcription of various human and viral genes, including EF1A [3,18], ubiquitin C (UBC) [19], CCR5 [20], RASSF1A [20,21], the progesterone receptor [2224], the androgen receptor and huntingtin [25], the major vault protein and cyclooxygenase-2 [22], cadherin-1 [26], endothelial nitric oxide synthase [27], oncogene c-MYC [28], viral genes regulated by the long terminal repeat region of HIV-1 [18,29,30] and simian immunodeficiency virus [31], and the human, as well as the mouse INK4/ARF locus encoding several tumor suppressor proteins [32]. In these studies, exogenously delivered siRNAs with a sequence complementary to the target promoter were capable of triggering epigenetic modifications at the target genomic loci, resulting in the silencing of gene transcription. Importantly, the antisense strand of siRNA alone was able to direct sequence-specific TGS via an increase in the epigenetic marks that are characteristic for silenced chromatin at the target promoter in human cells [18].

Chromatin remodeling in the vicinity and downstream of the initial siRNA target site accompanies RNA-triggered TGS. For example, an enrichment of the silent chromatin marks H3K9me2 (dimethylation at Lys9 of histone 3) and H3K27me3 (trimethylation of Lys27 at histone 3) was observed at siRNA-targeted promoter loci ([3,1820, 30,3236]; reviewed in reference [37]). Proteins involved in TGS in humans have not been characterized comprehensively. The RNA-binding protein argonaute 1 (Ago1) has been established to be required for the initiation of siRNA-mediated TGS in human cells [19,20,25,30,32,35,36]. In addition to Ago1, Ago2 [25,32] and TAR-RNA binding protein 2 (TRBP2) [20] were also observed to be involved in siRNA-mediated TGS in humans. For example, Ago2 and Ago1 were involved in small-duplex RNA-mediated TGS of the progesterone receptor promoter in T47D cells [25]. In this particular example, TGS was not accompanied by epigenetic modifications in promoter-associated histones [25]. This study highlighted the possible existence of different RNA-mediated TGS pathways in human cells that may be regulated by different factors, and the observation that TGS may not always be accompanied by chromatin remodeling [25]. However, proteins involved in chromatin remodeling, including the de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3A [18,19,30], HDAC1 [19,30,36] and the histone lysine methyltransferases KMT6 (formerly Ezh2) [20,30] and KMT1C (formerly G9a) [19], were demonstrated to play a role in TGS in humans (Figure 1; for the new nomenclature of chromatin-modifying enzymes, see reference [38]). The initial steps in TGS are the recruitment of the Ago1-siRNA nucleoprotein complex to the targeted promoter loci and the interaction of the complex with a promoter-associated nascent RNA transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) [34]. Transcripts that are targeted by the TGS pathway in a siRNA- and Ago1-dependent manner in the nucleus are not degraded [37]. Ago1 was also observed to interact with RNAPII [20]. The RNAPII-Ago1 interaction may actively contribute to the recruitment of the Ago1-RNA complex to the gene promoter. An analysis of high-throughput sequencing data of a short-RNA population from mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and from a genome-wide nuclear run-on assay in human fibroblasts revealed that widespread and divergent transcription occurs at promoters over short distances, and that this phenomenon is common for active genes in higher eukaryotes [39,40]. Depletion of the exosome in human cells identified a new class of upstream transcripts within promoters (PROMPTs) that are transcribed in both directions, and the levels of which peak at distances of 1 kb upstream of known protein-coding genes [41]. These recent genome-wide studies support previous observations that promoter-associated RNA transcripts associate with several genes and play a role in TGS [34]. Although the two silent chromatin marks, H3K9me2 and H3K27me3, together with the Ago1, Dnmt3A and HDAC1 proteins are considered to be hallmarks of siRNA-mediated TGS in human cells [37], the mechanisms of chromatin modification at promoters remain to be determined.

Figure 1
A model for the antisense non-coding RNA-mediated initiation of transcriptional gene silencing in human cells

Long-term transcriptional gene silencing

Short hairpin RNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing

An important aspect of TGS in humans has emerged recently. A short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeted to the promoter of the UBC gene in human cells was demonstrated to mediate long-term transcriptional silencing [19]. Importantly, the suppression of UBC was observed for 1 month, although expression of the shRNA targeting the UBC promoter was induced for only 7 days. TGS was dependent on the presence of a promoter-targeted antisense shRNA, and additional factors such as Ago1, Dnmt3a and HDAC1, and to some extent the H3K9-specific lysine methyltransferase KMT1C, but not the H3K27-specific lysine methyltransferase KMT6 [19]. Conversely, the maintenance of long-term TGS was dependent on the DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a, but was independent of Ago1, HDAC1 or the shRNA that initially triggered TGS [19]. Methylation of CpG islands in the promoters of human genes has been established to play a significant role in the stable, long-term epigenetic silencing of genes throughout healthy development, and in cancer [42]. In addition, the requirement for Dnmt1, an enzyme responsible for the maintenance of DNA methylation, correlated with the observed increase in DNA methylation at the UBC promoter [19]. These data suggest that silencing is established initially at the level of histone methylation, which is subsequently followed by DNA methylation. After these epigenetic changes have occurred, it is possible to maintain TGS in a long-term manner without the need for the initial RNA effector molecule [19]. This example of long-term silencing by a ncRNA is the only published example of long-term TGS by exogenous RNA effectors [19]. Many cases of long-term TGS by endogenous long ncRNAs also exist, and are reviewed in reference [43].

Long non-coding RNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing

The Polycomb and Thrithorax groups of proteins

Polycomb (PcG) proteins act to repress transcription, whereas the Thrithorax group (TrxG) of proteins act to maintain transcription. These proteins are important genome-wide regulators that are required to establish long-term gene expression during development through modulation of the epigenetic state of chromatin [44,45]. In D melanogaster, PcG response elements (PREs) or TrxG response elements (TREs) are several hundred base pairs in length and function as the sites of PcG or TrxG complex recruitment, respectively [44]. The definition of PREs or TREs in vertebrates has not been established [44,46]. Interestingly, many PREs and TREs appear to be transcribed from both DNA strands [46]. Hekimoglu and Ringrose suggest, among four alternative models, one possible model for PcG/TrxG recruitment that is based on an RNA-RNA interaction: a free RNA transcript binds the PcG or TrxG complex; subsequently, the PcG-RNA and/or TrxG-RNA complex associates with a complementary nascent RNA transcript transcribed in the opposite direction, resulting in the recruitment of PcG/TrxG to bidirectionally transcribed genomic loci [46]. An analogous mechanism was proposed for TGS in the case of the p21 and E-cadherin tumor suppressors in human cells [47], whereby antisense RNA transcript spanning a gene promoter targets a nascent promoter-associated RNA transcribed in the sense direction. This targeting results in recruitment of a putative transcriptional silencing complex and subsequent formation of heterochromatin in the promoter region, leading to transcriptional silencing of the target genes [47] (Figure 1).

An example of PcG- and TrxG-regulated genes that are involved in the development of higher eukaryotes is the HOX family of genes [44]. In a comprehensive study investigating the transcriptional activity of human HOX loci, 231 ncRNA transcripts with low-coding potential were identified to be transcribed from the intergenic regions [48]. The majority of these ncRNA transcripts (74%) were transcribed in an antisense orientation compared with the HOX genes [48]. The same study identified a long ncRNA termed HOTAIR (Hox antisense intergenic RNA), which is a 2.2-kb spliced and polyadenylated transcript that is transcribed from the HOXC locus. The HOTAIR transcript negatively regulates the distant HOXD locus in trans through the recruitment of the PRC2 Polycomb complex, which correlates with increased levels of the repressive H3K27me3 mark on the HOXD locus [48].

Long non-coding RNAs involved in X inactivation

In the case of X chromosome inactivation, a 17-kb ncRNA transcript in humans [49] and a 15-kb transcript in mice [50], the X inactive-specific transcript (Xist) mediates silencing of gene expression from one copy of the X chromosome, the mechanism through which dosage compensation in female mammals operates during early development [51]. A study in mouse ES cells and embryonic fibroblasts led to the characterization of a 1.6-kb RepA long ncRNA that was transcribed from the repeat A element of the XIST locus [52]. The RepA ncRNA recruited the PRC2 Polycomb complex to the XIST promoter through a direct interaction with the KMT6 subunit of PRC2 [52]. Initial local trimethylation of H3K27 at the 5′ end of the XIST gene by PRC2 created a heterochromatic patch that, paradoxically, led to XIST transactivation resulting in widespread X inactivation [53]. In mice, XIST activity itself was negatively regulated in cis by the 40-kb ncRNA Tsix (X inactive-specific transcript backwards), which is transcribed antisense to XIST [54]. Tsix also modulates the chromatin status at the XIST promoter [51]. Interestingly, the transcription of TSIX through the XIST promoter in the antisense direction is a prerequisite for downregulation of XIST [55]. Although the Tsix sequence is conserved between mice and humans [54], whether Tsix-mediated downregulation of XIST occurs in human cells remains to be determined. These recent insights into the mechanism of X inactivation (reviewed in references [51,56,57]) revealed a complex role for long ncRNAs in the regulation of gene expression through modulation of the epigenetic status.

Genomic imprinting of autosomal genes

Additional examples of long ncRNAs involved in genomic imprinting of autosomal genes – a mono-allelic mechanism of gene silencing based on the parent-of-origin- include Air [58] and Kcnq1ot1 [59] (reviewed in reference [57]); this mechanism has been studied extensively in mice. Both the 108-kb Air and the 91-kb Kcnq1ot1 ncRNAs are transcribed by RNAPII [60,61]. These ncRNAs function to silence large domains of the genome epigenetically through their interaction with chromatin. The Air ncRNA silences in cis the three paternally inherited genes IGF2R, SLC22A2 and SLC22A3, which are all within 300 kb, and is transcribed in an antisense direction to IGF2R and SLC22A3 [58]. Air localizes to the silenced SLC22A3 promoter and recruits the KMT1C lysine methyltransferase, which leads to targeted H3K9 methylation and allele-specific gene silencing by chromatin remodeling [60]. The Kcnq1ot1 mRNA is transcribed from intron 10 of the KCNQ1 gene in an antisense direction and silences several paternally inherited genes in cis that are transcribed in both directions from within a 780-kb region [59,6163]. Kcnq1ot1 RNA itself is required for epigenetic silencing of neighboring genes upstream and downstream of the KCNQ1 locus [64]. In addition, epigenetic silencing has been demonstrated to correlate with the interaction of Kcnq1ot1 with both the PRC2 Polycomb complex and the KMT1C lysine methyltransferase, as well as with the enrichment of the repressive histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 at the loci of silenced genes [64]. The PRC2 complex has been identified to be responsible for trimethylation of H3K27 in D melanogaster [65], while KMT1C is responsible for mono- and dimethylation of H3K9 at Kcnq1ot1-targetted promoters in mammalian cells [66]. The mechanism of epigenetic gene silencing by long ncRNAs in X inactivation and in genomic imprinting was recently reviewed comprehensively by Nagano and Fraser [57],

Interestingly, while Air localizes to the nucleus, spliced versions of this ncRNA have been demonstrated to localize in the cytoplasm [67]. In comparison, Kcnq1ot1 is polyadenylated, but not spliced, and localizes exclusively to the nucleus [64]. Introducing an exon/intron boundary into the KCNQ1 gene had no observable effect on the nuclear localization of Kcnq1ot1 RNA [64]. Intriguingly, the HOTAIR antisense RNA, which regulates the HOXD cluster of genes, is both spliced and polyadenylated [48]. Based on these observations, a striking aspect of ncRNA biogenesis, that has not yet been assessed comprehensively, is the role of post-transcriptional processing and the potential influence of this process on the biological activity and nuclear localization of regulatory ncRNAs.

Transcriptional gene silencing of tumor suppressors in human cells is mediated by antisense transcription

Many tumor suppressor genes are silenced epigenetically in a variety of cancers [42]. In addition, various genes associated with CpG islands also undergo de novo DNA methylation in cancer [42]. Yu et al recognized that several annotated antisense transcripts are associated with many well-characterized tumor suppressor genes, and investigated the possibility that antisense RNAs may trigger epigenetic silencing of mammalian genes [68]. In this study, the p15 antisense RNA transcript was demonstrated to silence p15 expression both in cis and in trans, although the cis mechanism predominated. Interestingly, eliminating overexpression of p15 antisense RNA did not reactivate p15 mRNA expression, indicating that long-term transcriptional silencing was established upon exposure to high levels of the p15 antisense RNA. In addition, relatively stable silencing of p15 expression correlated with an increase in H3K9me2 and with a decrease in the transcriptionally active chromatin mark H3K4me2 at the p15 promoter. However, an increase in p15 promoter DNA methylation was not observed, suggesting that the formation of heterochromatin rather than DNA methylation of the p15 promoter was a prerequisite for p15 antisense RNA-mediated TGS. Moreover, TGS of p15 induced by the antisense transcript was Dicer-independent, indicating that the mechanism of p15 silencing did not act through the siRNA/miRNA post-transcriptional gene-silencing pathway, in which the Dicer complex is a central component [68].

Although most data on the role of siRNAs in TGS demonstrate the ability of these molecules to silence target gene promoters directly via the initiation of epigenetic changes, treatment of human cells with siRNAs targeted toward promoter regions also resulted in the transcriptional activation of E-cadherin and the tumor suppressor p21 genes [69,70]. A subsequent study conducted to determine the mechanism of siRNA-mediated activation of p21 gene transcription indicated that the activating siRNAs targeted and post-transcriptionally silenced an antisense ncRNA transcript associated with the p21 genomic locus [47]. This study therefore revealed that antisense ncRNAs can negatively regulate their sense counterpart and function as effectors of TGS in human cells in an Ago1-dependent manner [47]. These data indicated that RNAs transcribed in an antisense direction can lead to an enrichment of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 at the sense protein-coding promoter, resulting in TGS. In the case of siRNA-mediated TGS, the antisense strand of siRNA alone is the effector molecule that triggers TGS in human cells [18]. Thus, while the studies with siRNAs highlighted potential mechanisms of action, it is the antisense RNAs that have helped elucidate the underlying mechanism of TGS in human cells [18]. The direct consequence of an imbalance in endogenous bidirectional transcription could potentially lead to the deregulation of genes, a situation often observed in various diseases, including cancer. These data, when considered in the context of previously described data on long ncRNAs that function in imprinting, such as Xist, Air and Kcnq1ot1, suggest that the association of antisense ncRNA transcripts that have a regulatory function with the transcription of protein-coding genes in human cells could be a more common phenomenon than previously anticipated.

Chromatin-modifying activities potentially involved in ncRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing

KMT6, and the recently identified mammalian homolog Ezh1 [71,72], are the only known methyltransferases that methylate H3K27 (a transcriptionally repressive chromatin mark that is associated with TGS). KMT6 and/or Ezh1 are associated with two other subunits, SUZ12 (JJAZ1) and EED, in the PRC2 and/or PRC3 Polycomb complexes [73,74], which have been implicated in mediating long-term TGS in mammals (discussed in detail in the Polycomb and Thrithorax groups of proteins section). Moreover, an interaction between the HDAC1 and HDAC2 histone deacetylases and the EED subunit of the PRC2 Polycomb complex was demonstrated in which histone deacetylase activity was required for PRC2-mediated transcriptional repression, thereby providing a mechanistic link between Polycomb-mediated gene repression and histone deacetylation [75]. In a subsequent study, an important physical and functional interaction between KMT6 and the DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1, Dnmt3A and Dnmt3B in the context of the PRC2 Polycomb complex was demonstrated, whereby KMT6 was required for CpG methylation of Polycomb-targeted promoters [76]. The requirement for the H3K27me3-specific KMT6 lysine methyltransferase in some cases, together with the requirement of HDAC1 and Dnmt3a for establishing TGS [37], strongly suggest a role for the PRC2 and/or possibly the PRC3 Polycomb complex in RNA-mediated TGS. Although H3K27me3 is undoubtedly linked to TGS, the precise mechanistic role of H3K27-specific lysine methyltransferase activity in association with the PCR2 and/or PCR3 Polycomb complexes is unclear, and requires further investigation.

Methylation of Lys9 of histone H3 (H3K9) is an epigenetic hallmark of heterochromatin formation and transcriptional silencing in eukaryotes [77]. Five lysine methyltransferases have been identified for which H3K9 is a substrate: KMT1C (G9a), KMT1D (Glp), KMT8 (Riz1), KMT1E (Eset) and KMT1A/B (Suv39h1/2) ([38]; reviewed in reference [78]). Of these five methyltransferases, KMT1C appears to be the predominant H3K9 methyltransferase in mammalian cells [79,80]. A functional interaction between KMT1C-mediated H3K9 methylation and DNA methylation was demonstrated in several studies [8184]. In particular, a direct interaction between the histone methyltransferase KMT1C and the DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 was reported [82]. In ES cells, the KMT1C/KMT1D complex was demonstrated to regulate both H3K9 incorporation and DNA methylation, two epigenetic marks that cooperatively silence gene expression [85]. Furthermore, genetic evidence has indicated that the DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3A and Dnmt3B are responsible for de novo DNA methylation at the KMT1C/KMT1D target loci [85]. These data, together with the observations that KMT1C is required for the long-term silencing of the UBC promoter [19], suggest that KMT1C is the primary candidate for H3K9-specific methyltransferase activity in human cells, and should be investigated further.

The DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3A and Dnmt1 had been demonstrated to associate in vivo with the histone deacetylase HDAC1 [8689] and with the H3K9-specific methyltransferase KMT1A [90]. Thus, given the complex network of interactions between chromatin-modifying proteins, a putative transcriptional silencing complex may mediate TGS in the nucleus of human cells. As outlined in Figure 1, the transcriptional silencing complex may contain either the KMT1C or KMT1A H3K9-specific methyltransferases and other chromatin-modifying proteins, such as the KMT6-containing Polycomb complex PRC2, which methylates H3K27, HDAC1 and the DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3A and Dnmt1. A comprehensive characterization of the enzymatic activities responsible for the chromatin remodeling that accompanies TGS, and further biochemical analysis of protein complexes involved in TGS in the cell nucleus will be invaluable for gaining insight into the mechanism of RNA-mediated TGS.

Parallels between transcriptional gene silencing in development, imprinting and cancer

Currently, limited data are available on antisense RNA-mediated TGS in the context of tumor suppressor proteins [47,68]. Nevertheless, studies on TGS of tumor the suppressors p15 and p21 [47,68] suggest that the mechanism of TGS closely resembles that of developmentally regulated and imprinted genes, whereby long ncRNAs function in cis in combination with Polycomb proteins to establish a silent chromatin state and to silence gene expression [47,68]. The analogy between Polycomb-mediated gene silencing in development and antisense-mediated epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes in cancer suggests that there is a common underlying theme among these apparently distinct biological processes. Therefore, targeting the epigenetic machinery, which involves Polycomb protein complexes and perhaps DNA methyltransferase complexes, to the epigenetically silenced genes during both development and cancer could be mediated by a related mechanism involving long ncRNA transcripts in higher eukaryotes [6].

Evidence suggesting that the well-characterized tumor suppressor genes encoded in the INK4a/ARF locus, which control cell-cycle progression and senescence, are regulated by Polycomb proteins was obtained in a study in mice by Jacobs et al [91]. Since this study, the regulation of the INK4a/ARF tumor suppressor genes has been investigated extensively and the epigenetic mode of their transcriptional regulation is well established (reviewed in references [92,93]). A long antisense ncRNA termed ANRIL was detected within the INK4a/ARF chromosomal region in human cells; the first exon of ANVIL is located in the promoter of the p14/ARF gene and overlaps two exons of the p15/CDKN2B gene [94]. The role of ANRIL or potentially other, as yet unidentified, ncRNAs in the regulation of the INK4a/ARF locus has currently not been established.

Interestingly, in some human cells, including the differentiated fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 [95] and immature hematopoietic precursor cells [96], the induction of X inactivation was Xist-responsive outside of the usual discrete developmental window in which expression if the XIST gene normally occurs [56]. In addition, in a mouse thymic lymphoma model, the induction of Xist resulted in the initiation of X inactivation and the inhibition of tumor growth [97]. This study also led to the identification of SATB1, a nuclear matrix protein and genome organizer [98], and its close homolog SATB2[97] as the first identified cofactors required for Xist-mediated initiation of X chromosome inactivation [97]. These findings suggest that perturbing mechanisms of TGS involving Xist ncRNA play a significant role in tumorigenesis. Moreover, elevated expression levels of SATB1 correlated with aggressive breast tumor phenotypes, whereby SATB1 upregulated metastasis-associated genes and downregulated tumor suppressor genes directly [99]. The role of SATB1 in both X chromosome inactivation and tumorigenesis is notable, and future studies are expected to reveal whether the SATB1/SATB2 proteins have a more general role in RNA-mediated TGS.

Whether long ncRNAs, ubiquitous antisense transcription and Polycomb complexes mediate transcriptional gene silencing in development, imprinting and cancer in humans remains to be established. A better understanding of the TGS mechanism mediated by ncRNAs through epigenetic changes in chromatin will undoubtedly help to resolve these issues.

Conclusion

Transcription in the mammalian genome is pervasive, both in the sense and antisense directions. Emerging evidence highlights a role and function for ncRNAs in the regulation of gene expression. While there are clearly differences between the experimental systems discussed herein, namely siRNA-mediated TGS, Polycomb-mediated silencing of imprinted genes and antisense RNA-mediated repression of tumor suppressors, a common underlying regulatory theme, whereby ncRNAs silence gene transcription through epigenetic modifications of chromatin within promoter regions, is evident. Only a few proteins involved in ncRNA-mediated TGS pathways have been identified and attempts to characterize the underlying ncRNA-mediated TGS mechanism in human cells are at an early stage. A detailed mechanistic understanding of RNA-mediated TGS of tumor suppressors will contribute significantly to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the early stages of tumor development. Understanding the TGS mechanism on a molecular level will lead directly to molecular strategies aimed at preventing tumorigenesis. Restoring physiological levels of gene expression for tumor suppressors by suppressing the transcription of antisense ncRNAs in a highly specific manner, using RNAi technology, has significant therapeutic potential, providing a promising strategy for the treatment of cancer and other diseases by the targeted control of gene transcription. The identification of a comprehensive set of genes that appear to be silenced by antisense ncRNAs in various tumor tissues will prove to be a highly valuable prognostic biomarker for the emergence of cancer.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anne-Marie Turner for critical reading of the manuscript. Barbora Malecová is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Pfizer Inc. This research is supported by an NIH NIAID grant (R01AI084406) awarded to Kevin Morris. The Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine (Scripps Research Institute) number for this manuscript is 20463-MEM.

References

•• of outstanding interest

• of special interest

1•. Moazed D. Small RNAs in transcriptional gene silencing and genome defence. Nature. 2009;457(7228):413–420. Reviews the roles of diverse small-RNA silencing pathways in the regulation of chromatin structure and transcription in plants, animals and fungi. [PubMed]
2•. Verdel A, Vavasseur A, Le Gorrec M, Touat-Todeschini L. Common themes in siRNA-mediated epigenetic silencing pathways. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53(2–3):245–257. Reviews the mechanisms of siRNA-mediated chromatin modifications and TGS, highlighting similarities between fission yeast, plants and animals. [PubMed]
3. Morris KV, Chan SW, Jacobsen SE, Looney DJ. Small interfering RNA-induced transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Science. 2004;305(5688):1289–1292. [PubMed]
4. Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: Insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(3):155–159. [PubMed]
5. Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):629–641. [PubMed]
6. Morris KV. Long antisense non-coding RNAs function to direct epigenetic complexes that regulate transcription in human cells. Epigenetics. 2009;4(5):296–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Bertone P, Stolc V, Royce TE, Rozowsky JS, Urban AE, Zhu X, Rinn JL, Tongprasit W, Samanta M, Weissman S, Gerstein M, et al. Global identification of human transcribed sequences with genome tiling arrays. Science. 2004;306(5705):2242–2246. [PubMed]
8. Birney E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dutta A, Guigo R, Gingeras TR, Margulies EH, Weng Z, Snyder M, Dermitzakis ET, Thurman RE, Kuehn MS, et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447(7146):799–816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Carninci P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S, Gough J, Frith MC, Maeda N, Oyama R, Ravasi T, Lenhard B, Wells C, Kodzius R, et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science. 2005;309(5740):1559–1563. [PubMed]
10. Cheng J, Kapranov P, Drenkow J, Dike S, Brubaker S, Patel S, Long J, Stern D, Tammana H, Helt G, Sementchenko V, et al. Transcriptional maps of 10 human chromosomes at 5-nucleotide resolution. Science. 2005;308(5725):1149–1154. [PubMed]
11•. Guttman M, Amit I, Garber M, French C, Lin MF, Feldser D, Huarte M, Zuk O, Carey BW, Cassady JP, Cabili MN, et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature. 2009;458(7235):223–227. Describes a novel approach for identifying functional large-intervening ncRNAs based on chromatin structure and evolutionary conservation. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12•. He Y, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW. The antisense transcriptomes of human cells. Science. 2008;322(5909):1855–1857. Identified antisense transcripts in 2900 to 6400 genes from different human cell types. The distribution of antisense transcripts was distinct from that of sense transcripts, and was distributed non-randomly across the genome. Antisense transcription was concluded to be a pervasive feature of human cells. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Kampa D, Cheng J, Kapranov P, Yamanaka M, Brubaker S, Cawley S, Drenkow J, Piccolboni A, Bekiranov S, Helt G, Tammana H, et al. Novel RNAs identified from an in-depth analysis of the transcriptome of human chromosomes 21 and 22. Genome Res. 2004;14(3):331–342. [PubMed]
14. Kapranov P, Cheng J, Dike S, Nix DA, Duttagupta R, Willingham AT, Stadler PF, Hertel J, Hackermuller J, Hofacker IL, Bell I, et al. RNA maps reveal new RNA classes and a possible function for pervasive transcription. Science. 2007;316(5830):1484–1488. [PubMed]
15. Katayama S, Tomaru Y, Kasukawa T, Waki K, Nakanishi M, Nakamura M, Nishida H, Yap CC, Suzuki M, Kawai J, Suzuki H, et al. Antisense transcription in the mammalian transcriptome. Science. 2005;309(5740):1564–1566. [PubMed]
16. Yelin R, Dahary D, Sorek R, Levanon EY, Goldstein O, Shoshan A, Diber A, Biton S, Tamir Y, Khosravi R, Nemzer S, et al. Widespread occurrence of antisense transcription in the human genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(4):379–386. [PubMed]
17. Lindberg J, Lundeberg J. The plasticity of the mammalian transcriptome. Genomics. 2010;95(1):1–6. [PubMed]
18. Weinberg MS, Villeneuve LM, Ehsani A, Amarzguioui M, Aagaard L, Chen ZX, Riggs AD, Rossi JJ, Morris KV. The antisense strand of small interfering RNAs directs histone methylation and transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. RNA. 2006;12(2):256–262. [PubMed]
19•. Hawkins PG, Santoso S, Adams C, Anest V, Morris KV. Promoter targeted small RNAs induce long-term transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(9):2984–2995. Provided the first evidence that small RNAs can trigger long-term TGS in humans that can subsequently be maintained in the absence of the initial RNA-effector molecule. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Kim DH, Villeneuve LM, Morris KV, Rossi JJ. Argonaute-1 directs siRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13(9):793–797. [PubMed]
21. Castanotto D, Tommasi S, Li M, Li H, Yanow S, Pfeifer GP, Rossi JJ. Short hairpin RNA-directed cytosine (CpG) methylation of the RASSF1A gene promoter in HeLa cells. Mol Ther. 2005;12(1):179–183. [PubMed]
22. Janowski BA, Kaihatsu K, Huffman KE, Schwartz JC, Ram R, Hardy D, Mendelson CR, Corey DR. Inhibiting transcription of chromosomal DNA with antigene peptide nucleic acids. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1(4):210–215. [PubMed]
23. Janowski BA, Younger ST, Hardy DB, Ram R, Huffman KE, Corey DR. Activating gene expression in mammalian cells with promoter-targeted duplex RNAs. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3(3):166–173. [PubMed]
24. Schwartz JC, Younger ST, Nguyen NB, Hardy DB, Monia BP, Corey DR, Janowski BA. Antisense transcripts are targets for activating small RNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15(8):842–848. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Janowski BA, Huffman KE, Schwartz JC, Ram R, Nordsell R, Shames DS, Minna JD, Corey DR. Involvement of Ago1 and Ago2 in mammalian transcriptional silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13(9):787–792. [PubMed]
26. Ting AH, Schuebel KE, Herman JG, Baylin SB. Short double-stranded RNA induces transcriptional gene silencing in human cancer cells in the absence of DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2005;37(8):906–910. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Zhang MX, Ou H, Shen YH, Wang J, Coselli J, Wang XL. Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by small RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(47):16967–16972. [PubMed]
28. Napoli S, Pastori C, Magistri M, Carbone GM, Catapano CV. Promoter-specific transcriptional interference and c-MYC gene silencing by siRNAs in human cells. EMBO J. 2009;28(12):1708–1719. [PubMed]
29. Suzuki K, Shijuuku T, Fukamachi T, Zaunders J, Guillemin G, Cooper D, Kelleher A. Prolonged transcriptional silencing and CpG methylation induced by siRNAs targeted to the HIV-1 promoter region. J RNAi Gene Silencing. 2005;1(2):66–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Turner AM, De La Cruz J, Morris KV. Mobilization-competent lentiviral vector-mediated sustained transcriptional modulation of HIV-1 expression. Mol Ther. 2009;17(2):360–368. [PubMed]
31. Lim HG, Suzuki K, Cooper DA, Kelleher AD. Promoter-targeted siRNAs induce gene silencing of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in vitro. Mol Ther. 2008;16(3):565–570. [PubMed]
32. Gonzalez S, Pisano DG, Serrano M. Mechanistic principles of chromatin remodeling guided by siRNAs and miRNAs. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(16):2601–2608. [PubMed]
33. Buhler M, Mohn F, Stalder L, Muhlemann O. Transcriptional silencing of nonsense codon-containing immunoglobulin minigenes. Mol Cell. 2005;18(3):307–317. [PubMed]
34•. Han J, Kim D, Morris KV. Promoter-associated RNA is required for RNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(30):12422–12427. Provides significant insight into the mechanism of TGS in humans by demonstrating that promoter-associated nascent RNA transcripts are the target of the small-RNA effector molecule. [PubMed]
35. Kim DH, Saetrom P, Snove O, Jr, Rossi JJ. MicroRNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(42):16230–16235. [PubMed]
36. Suzuki K, Juelich T, Lim H, Ishida T, Watanebe T, Cooper DA, Rao S, Kelleher AD. Closed chromatin architecture is induced by an RNA duplex targeting the HIV-1 promoter region. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(34):23353–23363. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Hawkins PG, Morris KV. RNA and transcriptional modulation of gene expression. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(5):602–607. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Allis CD, Berger SL, Cote J, Dent S, Jenuwien T, Kouzarides T, Pillus L, Reinberg D, Shi Y, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A, et al. New nomenclature for chromatin-modifying enzymes. Cell. 2007;131(4):633–636. [PubMed]
39•. Seila AC, Calabrese JM, Levine SS, Yeo GW, Rahl PB, Flynn RA, Young RA, Sharp PA. Divergent transcription from active promoters. Science. 2008;322(5909):1849–1851. Presents evidence, obtained by genome-wide sequencing of short RNAs in mouse ES cells, demonstrating that divergent transcription over short distances is a common feature of transcriptionally active eukaryotic genes. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40•. Core LJ, Waterfall JJ, Lis JT. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science. 2008;322(5909):1845–1848. Demonstrated, by genome-wide parallel sequencing of global nuclear run-on RNA molecules in human cells, that the majority of active promoters have RNAPII engaged in transcription upstream of the annotated gene and in the antisense direction compared with the respective proximal promoter. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41•. Preker P, Nielsen J, Kammler S, Lykke-Andersen S, Christensen MS, Mapendano CK, Schierup MH, Jensen TH. RNA exosome depletion reveals transcription upstream of active human promoters. Science. 2008;322(5909):1851–1854. Reports that transcriptionally active human promoters are frequently associated with transcripts produced by bidirectional transcription occuring between 0.5 to 2 kb upstream of the respective promoter. [PubMed]
42. Grønbaek K, Hother C, Jones PA. Epigenetic changes in cancer. APMIS. 2007;115(10):1039–1059. [PubMed]
43. Mattick JS. The genetic signatures of noncoding RNAs. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(4):e1000459. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Ringrose L, Paro R. Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:413–443. [PubMed]
45. Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb complexes and epigenetic states. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20(3):266–273. [PubMed]
46•. Hekimoglu B, Ringrose L. Non-coding RNAs in Polycomb/Trithorax regulation. RNA Biol. 2009;6(2):129–137. Reviews evidence for the mechanism of ncRNA-mediated recruitment and regulation of PcG and TrxG proteins. [PubMed]
47•. Morris KV, Santoso S, Turner AM, Pastori C, Hawkins PG. Bidirectional transcription directs both transcriptional gene activation and suppression in human cells. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(11):e1000258. Provides direct evidence that a ncRNA antisense to the p21 tumor suppressor acts to inhibit p21 transcription by the mechanism of epigenetic silencing, thus providing an example of bidirectional transcription as an endogenous gene-regulatory mechanism. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Rinn JL, Kertesz M, Wang JK, Squazzo SL, Xu X, Brugmann SA, Goodnough LH, Helms JA, Farnham PJ, Segal E, Chang HY. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2007;129(7):1311–1323. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Brown CJ, Hendrich BD, Rupert JL, Lafreniere RG, Xing Y, Lawrence J, Willard HF. The human XIST gene: Analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell. 1992;71(3):527–542. [PubMed]
50. Brockdorff N, Ashworth A, Kay GF, McCabe VM, Norris DP, Cooper PJ, Swift S, Rastan S. The product of the mouse XIST gene is a 15 kb inactive X-specific transcript containing no conserved ORF and located in the nucleus. Cell. 1992;71(3):515–526. [PubMed]
51. Senner CE, Brockdorff N. XIST gene regulation at the onset of X inactivation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19(2):122–126. [PubMed]
52. Zhao J, Sun BK, Erwin JA, Song JJ, Lee JT. Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science. 2008;322(5902):750–756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Sun BK, Deaton AM, Lee JT. A transient heterochromatic state in XIST preempts X inactivation choice without RNA stabilization. Mol Cell. 2006;21(5):617–628. [PubMed]
54. Lee JT, Davidow LS, Warshawsky D. TSIX, a gene antisense to XIST at the X-inactivation centre. Nat Genet. 1999;21(4):400–404. [PubMed]
55. Ohhata T, Hoki Y, Sasaki H, Sado T. Crucial role of antisense transcription across the XIST promoter in Tsix-mediated XIST chromatin modification. Development. 2008;135(2):227–235. [PubMed]
56. Payer B, Lee JT. X chromosome dosage compensation: How mammals keep the balance. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:733–772. [PubMed]
57. Nagano T, Fraser P. Emerging similarities in epigenetic gene silencing by long noncoding RNAs. Mamm Genome. 2009;20(9–10):557–562. [PubMed]
58. Sleutels F, Zwart R, Barlow DP. The non-coding Air RNA is required for silencing autosomal imprinted genes. Nature. 2002;415(6873):810–813. [PubMed]
59. Smilinich NJ, Day CD, Fitzpatrick GV, Caldwell GM, Lossie AC, Cooper PR, Smallwood AC, Joyce JA, Schofield PN, Reik W, Nicholls RD, et al. A maternally methylated CpG island in KVLQT1 is associated with an antisense paternal transcript and loss of imprinting in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(14):8064–8069. [PubMed]
60. Seidl CI, Stricker SH, Barlow DP. The imprinted Air ncRNA is an atypical RNAPII transcript that evades splicing and escapes nuclear export. EMBO J. 2006;25(15):3565–3575. [PubMed]
61•. Pandey RR, Mondal T, Mohammad F, Enroth S, Redrup L, Komorowski J, Nagano T, Mancini-Dinardo D, Kanduri C. Kcnq1ot1 antisense noncoding RNA mediates lineage-specific transcriptional silencing through chromatin-level regulation. Mol Cell. 2008;32(2):232–246. Describes a mechanism whereby the Kcnq1ot1 long ncRNA establishes lineage-specific transcriptional silencing patterns through the recruitment of chromatin remodeling complexes. [PubMed]
62•. Nagano T, Mitchell JA, Sanz LA, Pauler FM, Ferguson-Smith AC, Feil R, Fraser P. The Air noncoding RNA epigenetically silences transcription by targeting G9a to chromatin. Science. 2008;322(5908):1717–1720. Provides a mechanistic link between long ncRNAs and transcriptional gene silencing in development, demonstrating that the Air ncRNA silences gene transcription epigenetically by targeting repressive histone-modifying activities to the gene promoter. [PubMed]
63. Fitzpatrick GV, Soloway PD, Higgins MJ. Regional loss of imprinting and growth deficiency in mice with a targeted deletion of KVDMR1. Nat Genet. 2002;32(3):426–431. [PubMed]
64. Shin JY, Fitzpatrick GV, Higgins MJ. Two distinct mechanisms of silencing by the KVDMR1 imprinting control region. EMBO J. 2008;27(1):168–178. [PubMed]
65. Mancini-Dinardo D, Steele SJ, Levorse JM, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM. Elongation of the Kcnq1ot1 transcript is required for genomic imprinting of neighboring genes. Genes Dev. 2006;20(10):1268–1282. [PubMed]
66. Czermin B, Melfi R, McCabe D, Seitz V, Imhof A, Pirrotta V. Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites. Cell. 2002;111(2):185–196. [PubMed]
67. Peters AH, Kubicek S, Mechtler K, O’Sullivan RJ, Derijck AA, Perez-Burgos L, Kohlmaier A, Opravil S, Tachibana M, Shinkai Y, Martens JH, et al. Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin. Mol Cell. 2003;12(6):1577–1589. [PubMed]
68•. Yu W, Gius D, Onyango P, Muldoon-Jacobs K, Karp J, Feinberg AP, Cui H. Epigenetic silencing of tumour suppressor gene p15 by its antisense RNA. Nature. 2008;451(7175):202–206. Provided the first evidence that natural antisense RNA can trigger TGS through epigenetic changes, such as heterochromatin formation and DNA methylation at the promoter of tumor suppressor genes, potentially leading to tumorigenesis. Also demonstrated that for tumor suppressor genes with annotated antisense transcripts, the antisense transcripts are associated with their coding regions. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Li LC, Okino ST, Zhao H, Pookot D, Place RF, Urakami S, Enokida H, Dahiya R. Small dsRNAs induce transcriptional activation in human cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(46):17337–17342. [PubMed]
70. Place RF, Li LC, Pookot D, Noonan EJ, Dahiya R. MicroRNA-373 induces expression of genes with complementary promoter sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(5):1608–1613. [PubMed]
71. Margueron R, Li G, Sarma K, Blais A, Zavadil J, Woodcock CL, Dynlacht BD, Reinberg D. Ezh1 and Ezh2 maintain repressive chromatin through different mechanisms. Mol Cell. 2008;32(4):503–518. [PubMed]
72. Shen X, Liu Y, Hsu YJ, Fujiwara Y, Kim J, Mao X, Yuan GC, Orkin SH. Ezh1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements Ezh2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol Cell. 2008;32(4):491–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Kuzmichev A, Jenuwein T, Tempst P, Reinberg D. Different Ezh2-containing complexes target methylation of histone H1 or nucleosomal histone H3. Mol Cell. 2004;14(2):183–193. [PubMed]
74. Kuzmichev A, Nishioka K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev. 2002;16(22):2893–2905. [PubMed]
75. van der Vlag J, Otte AP. Transcriptional repression mediated by the human Polycomb-group protein EED involves histone deacetylation. Nat Genet. 1999;23(4):474–478. [PubMed]
76. Vire E, Brenner C, Deplus R, Blanchon L, Fraga M, Didelot C, Morey L, Van Eynde A, Bernard D, Vanderwinden JM, Bollen M, et al. The Polycomb group protein Ezh2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 2006;439(7078):871–874. [PubMed]
77. Moazed D, Bühler M, Buker SM, Colmenares SU, Gerace EL, Gerber SA, Hong EJ, Motamedi MR, Verdel A, Villén J, Gygi SP. Studies on the mechanism of RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2006;71:461–471. [PubMed]
78. Hublitz P, Albert M, Peters AH. Mechanisms of transcriptional repression by histone lysine methylation. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53(2–3):335–354. [PubMed]
79. Tachibana M, Ueda J, Fukuda M, Takeda N, Ohta T, Iwanari H, Sakihama T, Kodama T, Hamakubo T, Shinkai Y. Histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP form heteromeric complexes and are both crucial for methylation of euchromatin at H3-K9. Genes Dev. 2005;19(7):815–826. [PubMed]
80. Tachibana M, Sugimoto K, Nozaki M, Ueda J, Ohta T, Ohki M, Fukuda M, Takeda N, Niida H, Kato H, Shinkai Y. G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 2002;16(14):1779–1791. [PubMed]
81. Xin Z, Tachibana M, Guggiari M, Heard E, Shinkai Y, Wagstaff J. Role of histone methyltransferase G9a in CpG methylation of the Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting center. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(17):14996–15000. [PubMed]
82. Esteve PO, Chin HG, Smallwood A, Feehery GR, Gangisetty O, Karpf AR, Carey MF, Pradhan S. Direct interaction between Dnmt1 and G9a coordinates DNA and histone methylation during replication. Genes Dev. 2006;20(22):3089–3103. [PubMed]
83. Feldman N, Gerson A, Fang J, Li E, Zhang Y, Shinkai Y, Cedar H, Bergman Y. G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(2):188–194. [PubMed]
84. Ikegami K, Iwatani M, Suzuki M, Tachibana M, Shinkai Y, Tanaka S, Greally JM, Yagi S, Hattori N, Shiota K. Genome-wide and locus-specific DNA hypomethylation in G9a deficient mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes Cells. 2007;12(1):1–11. [PubMed]
85. Tachibana M, Matsumura Y, Fukuda M, Kimura H, Shinkai Y. G9a/GLP complexes independently mediate H3K9 and DNA methylation to silence transcription. EMBO J. 2008;27(20):2681–2690. [PubMed]
86. Fuks F, Burgers WA, Godin N, Kasai M, Kouzarides T. Dnmt3a binds deacetylases and is recruited by a sequence-specific repressor to silence transcription. EMBO J. 2001;20(10):2536–2544. [PubMed]
87. Fuks F, Burgers WA, Brehm A, Hughes-Davies L, Kouzarides T. DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 associates with histone deacetylase activity. Nat Genet. 2000;24(1):88–91. [PubMed]
88. Robertson KD, Ait-Si-Ali S, Yokochi T, Wade PA, Jones PL, Wolffe AP. Dnmt1 forms a complex with Rb, E2F1 and HDAC1 and represses transcription from E2F-responsive promoters. Nat Genet. 2000;25(3):338–342. [PubMed]
89. Datta J, Ghoshal K, Sharma SM, Tajima S, Jacob ST. Biochemical fractionation reveals association of DNA methyltransferase (Dnmt) 3b with Dnmt1 and that of Dnmt 3a with a histone H3 methyltransferase and HDAC1. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(5):855–864. [PubMed]
90. Fuks F, Hurd PJ, Deplus R, Kouzarides T. The DNA methyltransferases associate with HP1 and the Suv39h1 histone methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(9):2305–2312. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Jacobs JJ, Kieboom K, Marino S, DePinho RA, van Lohuizen M. The oncogene and Polycomb-group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the ink4a locus. Nature. 1999;397(6715):164–168. [PubMed]
92. Valk-Lingbeek ME, Bruggeman SW, van Lohuizen M. Stem cells and cancer; the polycomb connection. Cell. 2004;118(4):409–418. [PubMed]
93. Gil J, Peters G. Regulation of the INK4b-ARF-INK4a tumour suppressor locus: all for one or one for all. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(9):667–677. [PubMed]
94. Pasmant E, Laurendeau I, Heron D, Vidaud M, Vidaud D, Bieche I. Characterization of a germ-line deletion, including the entire INK4/ARF locus, in a melanoma-neural system tumor family: identification of ANRIL, an antisense noncoding RNA whose expression coclusters with ARF. Cancer Res. 2007;67(8):3963–3969. [PubMed]
95. Hall LL, Byron M, Sakai K, Carrel L, Willard HF, Lawrence JB. An ectopic human XIST gene can induce chromosome inactivation in postdifferentiation human HT-1080 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(13):8677–8682. [PubMed]
96. Savarese F, Flahndorfer K, Jaenisch R, Busslinger M, Wutz A. Hematopoietic precursor cells transiently reestablish permissiveness for X inactivation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(19):7167–7177. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
97. Agrelo R, Souabni A, Novatchkova M, Haslinger C, Leeb M, Komnenovic V, Kishimoto H, Gresh L, Kohwi-Shigematsu T, Kenner L, Wutz A. SATB1 defines the developmental context for gene silencing by Xist in lymphoma and embryonic cells. Dev Cell. 2009;16(4):507–516. [PubMed]
98. Galande S, Purbey PK, Notani D, Kumar PP. The third dimension of gene regulation: Organization of dynamic chromatin loopscape by SATB1. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17(5):408–414. [PubMed]
99. Han HJ, Russo J, Kohwi Y, Kohwi-Shigematsu T. SATB1 reprogrammes gene expression to promote breast tumour growth and metastasis. Nature. 2008;452(7184):187–193. [PubMed]