PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of tropmedLink to Publisher's site
 
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 May; 82(5): 801–807.
PMCID: PMC2861389

Measurement of Recent Exposure to Phlebotomus argentipes, the Vector of Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis, by Using Human Antibody Responses to Sand Fly Saliva

Abstract

Antibody (IgG) responses to the saliva of Phlebotomus argentipes were investigated using serum samples from regions of India endemic and non-endemic for visceral leishmaniasis (VL). By pre-adsorbing the sera against the saliva of the competing human-biting but non-VL vector P. papatasi, we significantly improved the specificity of a P. argentipes saliva enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Using this method, we observed a statistically significant correlation between antibodies to P. argenitpes saliva and the average indoor density of female sand flies. Additionally, the method was able to detect recent changes in vector exposure when sera from VL patients were assayed before, during, and after hospitalization and protected from sand fly bites under untreated bed nets. Collectively, these results highlight the utility of antibodies to P. argentipes saliva as an important tool to evaluate VL vector control programs.

Introduction

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in the Indian subcontinent, also known as kala-azar, is caused by Leishmania donovani. The disease is fatal if not treated, and VL is responsible for an estimated 60,000 deaths per year worldwide.1 The annual incidence of kala-azar cases is estimated to be 0.5 million and the prevalence to be 2.5 million.1 More than 90% of the world's reported VL cases are in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sudan, and Brazil. In India the main endemic focus is in Bihar State where resistance to the first-line treatment, pentavalent antimonials, is rife; there is no vaccine.2 In India, Nepal, and Bangladesh, L. donovani is transmitted exclusively by Phlebotomus argentipes, a sand fly that is considered anthroponotic.3,4 Because VL in the Indian subcontinent cycles predominantly between humans, with no established zoonotic involvement, control strategies have focused on prevention of infection through the promotion of early diagnosis and vector control.5,6

Currently, one of the biggest limitations to the evaluation of vector control programs is the accurate estimation of exposure to vector bites and transmission. Traditional methods rely heavily upon efficient trapping of vectors, and techniques such as human landing studies are now considered unethical for measuring protection in regions of endemicity.7,8 Field studies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques have demonstrated the presence of antibodies to sand fly saliva in humans,912 foxes, and dogs12 naturally exposed to sand fly bites. Accordingly, these findings have stimulated interest in the use of antibodies against sand fly saliva as a diagnostic tool for evaluating exposure and/or risk of infection among humans living in areas endemic for leishmaniasis. However, the utility of a sand fly saliva ELISA has not been formally demonstrated in human populations in VL foci. The vector specificity of the technique and its sensitivity to reflect levels of exposure in humans has not been addressed. Furthermore, basic information on the persistence of human antibodies against sand fly saliva in the field is unknown. This is particularly important if the technique is to be used to estimate recent histories of sand fly bite.

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential utility of a novel P. argentipes saliva ELISA to estimate recent exposure of human populations to sand fly bite, and to obtain much needed information on the kinetics of human antibody responses to this important VL vector.

Materials and Methods

Study population.

We tested 240 serum samples that were divided into five main groups: 1) 62 samples from healthy persons living in a rural VL-endemic foci of Bihar state, India; 2) 27 healthy Indian controls from urban, non-VL areas of Western Uttar Pradesh (Indian non-endemic controls [NECs]); 3) 12 samples from residents in the United Kingdom with no history of travel to India, Nepal, or Bangladesh (UK NECs); 4) 52 VL patients with active kala-azar from Bihar (L. donovani-positive by spleen biopsy) re-sampled after their 30-day treatment in a hospital and 16 of these re-sampled patients six months after discharge from a hospital; and 5) 87 Indian and Nepalese samples from control households of the KALANET Long Lasting Insecticide Bed Net study (ClinicalTrials.gov CT-2005-015374) in which untreated bed nets were used.

Serum samples used in the study were obtained from patients ≥ 15 years of age (India and Nepal: age range = 15–62 years, median = 30 years; UK: age range = 21–35 years, median = 24 years). Patients with VL were treated with either amphotericin B or paromomycin and confined to the Kala-Azar Medical Research Center in Muzzafarpur, Bihar State. During this time, they were protected from additional sand fly bites by the personal use of untreated bed nets in a hospital that routinely sprays their grounds with insecticides. Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the institutional review boards of B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, and the Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants and their households.

Sand fly survey.

The abundance of sand flies was estimated for 15 and 16 months in households in Nepal and India, respectively. Twenty-five houses were randomly selected from each of five control clusters (three in India and two in Nepal) of the KALANET project in which there was no prior history or current use of bed nets. Each house was sampled for one night in September 2006 for P. argentipes by aspiration, and 10 households from each cluster with the highest sand fly density were selected for a complete entomologic survey. For each survey, a CDC light trap (Miniature Incandescent Light Trap Model 1012; J.W. Hock Company, Gainesville, FL) was used. Collection was performed during one night per month (6:00 pm to 6:00 am) from September 2006 to November and December 2007 in Nepal and India, respectively. One CDC light trap per house was installed typically near the corner of a bedroom situated 15 cm above the ground and 3 cm away from the wall. Collected sand flies were sexed and speciated under a binocular microscope. Geometric means of female P. argentipes sand flies were calculated per household (aggregate = 15 months) to evaluate the in-house density (as a proxy for exposure to sand flies). Sera from permanent adult occupants were collected from each household during November–December 2007 at the end of entomologic monitoring.

Sand fly saliva preparation.

Saliva from colonized P. argentipes (Rajendra Memorial Research Institute, Patna, India, and Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom) or P. papatasi (Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic) was collected from female flies five days old post-emergence and maintained on 70% sucrose solution given ad libitum. Pools of 10 sand fly salivary gland pairs were collected in 50 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on ice and individually pierced to release their saliva. After centrifugation (1,800 × g for 5 minutes), the saliva was collected from the supernatant fraction, leaving behind the salivary gland epithelia and other sand fly debris. Aliquots of saliva from 50 flies were collected, pooled, and frozen at −70°C until used. For transportation to the field, saliva was lyophilized and reconstituted in its original volume of distilled water for one hour at room temperature before use.

Serologic analysis of antibodies against saliva.

Total specific IgG against saliva was measured by ELISA. All chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma (Irving, United Kingdom) unless otherwise stated. Microtiter plates (Maxisorb; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 50 μL of 50 ng of P. papatasi saliva in 0.01 M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6, overnight at 4°C. The wells were washed four times with 200 μL of PBS buffer containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-Tween) and blocked with 200 μL of 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS-Tween for 2 hours at 37°C. After washing, 100 μL of human sera were diluted 1:50 in PBS-Tween and incubated in duplicate overnight at 4°C (pre-adsorption step). In parallel, new plates were coated with 50 μL of 50 ng of P. argentipes saliva as described above and incubated overnight at 4°C without shaking. After washing and blocking of the P. argentipes-coated plates, sera were transferred from the P. papatasi plates to the P. argentipes plates and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. The P. papatasi plates were washed, filled with 200 μL of wash buffer, sealed with parafilm, and kept at 4°C for 2 hours, thus enabling sufficient time for the P. argentipes and P. papatasi plates to reach the same point in the protocol and be processed together for the rest of the assay. One hundred microliters of biotinylated anti-human IgG was added at a dilution of 1:2,000 in PBS-Tween to all plates and incubated for 1 hour at 25°C. The plates were then washed and incubated with 100 μL of streptavidin-conjugated alkaline phosphatase at a dilution of 1:1,000. One hundred microliters of paranitrophenylphosphate (1 mg/mL) diluted in substrate buffer (carbonate-bicarbonate buffer with 10% diethanolamine and 3 mM MgCl2, pH 9.6) was added as a substrate and the absorbance of the yellow product was measured at 405 nm using a Spectramax 190 ELISA plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) after 20 minutes of color development at 25°C in the dark. The cut-off value was set at two standard deviations from the mean of the Indian non-endemic control group.

Antibody half-life.

The half-life of antibodies against salivary in patients was determined from VL hospitalization study data by using the equation half life (in days) = elapsed time × log2/log (average day 0 titer/average day 30 titer).

Statistical analysis.

The ELISA data were not normally distributed. Therefore, the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare means using the Prism version 5 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Correlations were tested by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. For those paired data in which patients were assayed over time, a Wilcoxon matched pairs test was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

To investigate whether a human population from an leishmaniasis-endemic region had IgG against salivary gland antigens of the vector sand fly P. argentipes, we measured by ELISA the antibody level in sera of 89 adults from India and 12 adults from the United Kingdom. Analysis showed a high level of antibodies against P. argentipes saliva in persons from India compared with persons from the United Kingdom (P < 0.0001) (Figure 1A). The indirect ELISA used in all similar sand fly saliva studies to date did not detect any differences in antibody levels between non-endemic and leishmaniasis-endemic regions of India (P = 0.756) (Figure 1A). Only 24% (12 of 50) of persons from disease-endemic regions had values greater than the two standard deviation cut-off value compared with the Indian NEC group.

Figure 1.
Human IgG response to Phlebotomus argentipes and P. papatasi saliva. Comparison of United Kingdom (open triangles, n = 12) and Indian non-endemic control (NEC) (open circles, unadsorbed, n = 25 and pre-adsorbed, n = 27) sera against sera from an area ...

To investigate whether cross-reactive antigens to the competing human-biting sand fly P. papatasi interfered with the P. argentiptes ELISA, we re-examined the sera with a P. papatasi saliva ELISA. This test confirmed the presence of antibodies to saliva of this sand fly; 36% (18 of 50) of sera of persons from leishmaniasis-endemic regions had IgG levels greater than those of the non-endemic control cut-off value (P = 0.0004) (Figure 1B). Moreover, a positive correlation between IgG levels against the saliva from both these human-biting sand flies was present in persons in India from VL-endemic areas (P < 0.0001, Spearman r = 0.71) (Figure 1D). These data suggest that persons from VL-endemic regions are being bitten by P. papatasi and P. argentipes to a similar extent.

To improve the specificity of the ELISA for detection of P. argentipes, we tested the utility of a serum pre-adsorption step against P. papatasi saliva. Re-examination of the human sera with the modified P. argentipes ELISA method (Figure 1C) resulted in a greater degree of separation between the non-endemic and disease-endemic groups from India (P < 0.0001), with 82% (51 of 62) of sera from persons from VL-endemic regions above the cut-off value.

To test the ability of the P. argentipes saliva ELISA to measure sand fly exposure in the field, we conducted entomologic surveys of 28 households in India and 15 households in Nepal in VL-endemic foci. Using the P. papatasi pre-adsorbed saliva ELISA, we observed a significant logarithmic correlation between the antibody responses against P. argentipes saliva in sera from persons in India and Nepal sera and the 15-month geometric average number of indoor female P. argentipes trapped per household (Spearman r = 0.44, P = 0.0007) (Figure 2). A similar result was also found with antibodies against P. papatasi saliva (Spearman r = 0.44, P < 0.0001, data not shown). Analysis of individual clusters for geometric mean peak sand fly densities (recorded during October and November 2006) and saliva antibody responses confirmed that there was no bias between clusters (Supplementary Table 1, available at www.ajtmh.org).

Figure 2.
Correlation of human IgG levels to Phlebotomus argentipes saliva with indoor sand fly densities. Forty-three Indian and Nepalese households from five control clusters were surveyed for 15 months for densities of P. argentipes. Sand flies were sampled ...

To be considered a useful tool for measurement of recent exposure to sand fly bites, the antibody response of humans to sand fly saliva needs to be transient. To observe the kinetics of antibody responses against P. argentipes saliva in humans during vector intervention, we monitored VL patients immediately before hospitalization (day 0), at the end of their course of drug treatment (day 30), and six months after their discharge (day 180) (Figure 3). During hospitalization, patients were screened from additional sand fly bites by the use of untreated bed nets. Despite the wide variation, using the pre-adsorbed saliva ELISA, we found that the median antibody titers to P. argentipes saliva decreased during their stay in a hospital (day 0 versus day 30: P = 0.010) (Figure 3A). However, antibody levels then increased to greater than pre-hospitalization levels by six months after discharge (day 30 versus day 180, P. argentipes; P < 0.0001). Pairwise analysis of 16 sera for which all three time points were collected (Figure 3B) confirmed a decrease in individual saliva antibodies when persons slept under untreated bed nets (day 0 versus day 30; P = 0.0007). A similar response was also seen for antibody levels against P. papatasi saliva, with a moderate decrease from day 0 to day 30 (P = 0.19), followed by a significant increase after release from a hospital (P = 0.001). From these data, we calculated that for people in India, half-life of IgG against P. argentipes saliva is approximately 166 days.

Figure 3.
Decrease in human IgG levels to Phlebotomus argentipes saliva after vector intervention. A, Sera were analyzed for antibodies against the saliva of P. argentipes (using the P. papatasi pre-adsorbed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method) from patients ...

Discussion

We report the human antibody response to saliva of P. argentipes, the vector of VL in the Indian sub-continent. In human populations from VL-endemic areas, we found that levels of IgG reflect differences in sand fly exposure.

Sand fly saliva is a complex mixture of pharmacologically active compounds whose combined function is to help the sand fly obtain blood during a bite. This saliva is known to contain a variety of anti-hemostatic, vasodilatory, and immunomodulatory compounds.13 Therefore, saliva will always be present during a bite from either an uninfected or infected sand fly. Sand fly saliva is also highly immunogenic,912,14 and antibodies against saliva of specific sand fly vectors have been valued as potential tools for measurement of community or personal exposure to sand fly bites by ELISA and risk of Leishmania infection. The complexity of sand fly saliva is such that different species, and perhaps sibling species, of sand flies contain specific antigens,14,15 which reinforce the utility of this approach. It is expected that any salivary antigen used for this purpose should be 1) specific for the bite of the vector species in question, 2) sensitive enough to use as a measure of relative exposure, and 3) exhibit low persistence in the host to accurately reflect changes in vector exposure with time.

Our pre-adsorbed P. argentipes saliva ELISA could distinguish persons from a sand fly–free country (United Kingdom) or persons from urban areas of India where VL is rarely reported from those sera collected from persons in the VL-endemic State of Bihar, India. Pre-adsorption also enhanced the ability of the ELISA to distinguish between the Indian non-endemic control and VL endemic groups. The exact reason for this finding is unknown, but one explanation may be the result of the presence of P. papatasi and absence (or much lower frequency) of P. argentipes sand flies in the NEC region of Western Uttar Pradesh. More in depth entomologic surveying of Indian NEC regions are required to address this possibility. In India, P. argentipes and P. papatasi are the most frequent human-biting sand flies. Exploratory experiments using mice bitten by either P. papatasi or P. argentipes colonized sand flies showed that cross-reactive antibodies exist and that inclusion of a P. papatasi saliva pre-adsorption step significantly reduced their contribution in an ELISA for detection of antibodies against P. argentipes saliva (Hostomska J, Volf P, Rogers MR, unpublished data). Using this assay with human sera, we significantly reduced levels of cross-reactive antibodies against saliva between these sand fly species and vastly improved the specificity of the ELISA towards the VL vector. In addition, a useful byproduct of the pre-adsorption method is the ability to measure the antibody response to the competing sand fly species (P. papatasi).

To test the sensitivity of the P. argentipes saliva ELISA to reflect differing amounts of exposure to this sand fly, we surveyed households in India and Nepal for the number of P. argentipes and P. papatasi present over a 15–16-month period. Houses were selected from control clusters of the KALANET program in which no insecticide-treated bed nets were used. This survey showed that the average household sand fly densities of P. argentipes and P. papatasi showed a strong correlation with the antibody response of the residents to these endophilic and endophagic sand flies. It appears that the sensitivity of the assay is reduced when the P. papatasi saliva pre-adsorption step was included, as shown by the Indian NEC group. However, the overall benefit of this modification is the increased its specificity towards the VL vector. The specificity and sensitivity of the assay may be further improved if whole P. argentipes saliva could be replaced by recombinant antigen(s) that have been screened for their ability to reflect specific exposure to this fly bite. Because this approach will not require labor-intensive sand fly rearing and salivary gland dissection, this modification will make the assay more amenable for large-scale application.

Finally, we addressed the ability of antibodies against P. argentipes saliva to identify recent periods of non-exposure to sand fly bites. Such a tool would only have value for monitoring vector control measures that reduce sand fly contact rates for humans if antibody titers are transient and increase relatively quickly after re-exposure. This potential use has been observed for mosquito and tick salivary antigens in humans16,17 and triatomine salivary antigens in mice.18 To our knowledge, no studies have tested the kinetics of antibodies in humans against sand fly saliva from the field, but laboratory experiments with naive dogs exposed to the bites of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis have found significant decreases in IgG against sand fly saliva and IgG2 titers within weeks after exposure.19 In the present study, we show that VL patients hospitalized and protected from sand fly bite by untreated bed nets was corroborated by an average 15% reduction of antibody titers against P. argentipes after 30 days. Upon discharge from hospitals, antibody levels against saliva in these patients increased significantly beyond their original pre-treatment levels after six months re-exposure to bites. This finding indicates a classic antibody memory response to saliva of both species of sand flies.

Thus, the P. argentipes saliva ELISA is likely to be useful in understanding the epidemiology of VL. For example, L. donovani has been identified in the blood of domesticated animals sampled from VL-endemic regions of Nepal (Dujardin JC, unpublished data), and the saliva ELISA could help investigate this possible zoonotic cycle of transmission. A study in children in Brazil in whom antibodies against Lutzomyia longipalpis sand fly saliva developed showed that they were more likely to resist zoonotic VL caused by L. infantum chagasi.9,10 Whether a similar effect occurs between P. argentipes saliva and L. donovani infection in the Indian subcontinent remains to be tested but the assay we describe should be instrumental in these studies.

The novel saliva ELISA we describe is a significant step towards determining the communal (and eventually personal) level of P. argentipes exposure in human populations at risk for VL. After validation on a larger scale, this method will improve evaluation of vector control programs and enable investigation of new aspects of the epidemiology of this neglected tropical disease.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1: Comparison of Indian and Nepalese household sand fly densities and anti-saliva antibody levels. During the KALANET study sand flies were sampled monthly by CDC light trap for 15 months in households from control clusters (i.e. no bed nets and no insecticide house spraying) from VL endemic areas. Peak season sand fly densities taken from October and November 2006 are shown. Sera from the household residents were taken at the end of the survey and analyzed for P. argentipes and P. papatasi anti-saliva responses by ELISA. For comparison, the average non-endemic control anti- P. argentipes salivary antibody O.D. during this time was 0.7 ± 0.2.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Michael Miles for donating sera to optimize the ELISA protocol and Carolynne Stanley for collecting blood at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Notes

Note: Supplemental table appears online at www.ajtmh.org.

Footnotes

Financial support: This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust, UK (advanced training fellowship, project WT078223MA to Matthew E. Rogers), the Indian Council of Medical Research (junior fellowship to Rajiv Kumar), the Czech Republic Ministry of Education (LC 06009 and MSM0021620828), and the European Union (Project 015374, KALANET).

Authors' addresses: Meredith F. Clements, Albert Picado, and Clive Davies, Department of Disease Vector Biology and Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, E-mail: ku.ca.mthsl@odacip.trebla. Kamlesh Gidwani, Rajiv Kumar, and Shyam Sundar, Kala-azar Medical Research Center, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India, E-mail: moc.liamtoh@radnusmayhsrd. Jitka Hostomska, Vera Volfova, and Petr Volf, Department of Parasitology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, E-mail: zc.tensec@flov. Diwakar S. Dinesh, Vijay Kumar, and Pradeep Das, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (Indian Council of Medical Research), Patna, Bihar, India, E-mail: ni.ten.lnsv.2lac@psad. Ingrid Müller and Matthew E. Rogers, Division of Investigative Science, Department of Immunology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, St. Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom, E-mail: ku.ca.lairepmi@sregor.wehttam. Gordon Hamilton, Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom, E-mail: ku.ca.eleek.loib@notlimah.c.g.j. Marleen Boelaert, Unit of Epidemiology and Disease Control, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium, E-mail: eb.gti@trealeobm. Murari Das and Suman Rijal, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, E-mail: moc.oohay@2lajirnamus.

References

1. World Health Organization . Life in the Twenty-first Century: A Vision for All. The World Health Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
2. Sundar S. Drug resistance in Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Trop Med Int Health. 2001;6:849–854. [PubMed]
3. Swaminath CS, Shortt HE, Anderson LAP. Transmission of Indian kala-azar to man by bites of Phlebotomus argentipes Ann. and Brun. India. Indian J Med Res. 1942;30:473–477. [PubMed]
4. Kumar V, Kishore K, Palit A, Keshari S, Sharma MC, Das VN, Shivakumar S, Roy MS, Sinha NK, Prasad M, Kar SK. Vectorial efficacy of Phlebotomus argentipes in Kala-azar endemic foci of Bihar (India) under natural and artificial conditions. J Commun Dis. 2001;33:102–109. [PubMed]
5. Davies CR, Kaye P, Croft SL, Sundar S. Leishmaniasis: new approaches to disease control. BMJ. 2003;326:377–382. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Chappuis F, Sundar S, Hailu A, Ghalib H, Rijal S, Peeling RW, Alvar J, Boelaert M. Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:873–882. [PubMed]
7. Billingsley PF, Baird J, Mitchell JA, Drakeley C. Immune interactions between mosquitoes and their hosts. Immunity. 2006;28:143–153. [PubMed]
8. Dinesh DS, Das P, Picado A, Davies C, Speybroeck N, Ostyn, Boelaert M, Coosemans M. Long-lasting insecticidal nets fail at household level to reduce abundance of sandfly vector Phlebotomus argentipes in treated houses in Bihar (India) Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:953–958. [PubMed]
9. Barral A, Honda E, Caldas A, Costa J, Vinhas V, Rowton ED, Valenzuela JG, Charlab R, Barral-Netto M, Ribeiro JM. Human immune response to sand fly salivary gland antigens: a useful epidemiological marker? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62:740–745. [PubMed]
10. Gomes RB, Brodskyn C, de Oliveira CI, Costa J, Miranda JC, Caldas A, Valenzuela JG, Barral-Netto M, Barral A. Seroconversion against Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva concurrent with the development of anti-Leishmania chagasi delayed-type hypersensitivity. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:1530–1534. [PubMed]
11. Rohousova I, Ozensoy S, Ozbel Y, Volf P. Detection of species-specific antibody response of humans and mice bitten by sand flies. Parasitol. 2005;130:493–499. [PubMed]
12. Gomes RB, Mendonça IL, Silva VC, Ruas J, Silva MB, Cruz MS, Barral A, Costa CH. Antibodies against Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva in the fox Cerdocyon thous and the sylvatic cycle of Leishmania chagasi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:127–133. [PubMed]
13. Rohousová I, Volf P. Sand fly saliva: effects on host immune response and Leishmania transmission. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 2006;53:161–171. [PubMed]
14. Volf P, Rohousova I. Species-specific antigens in salivary glands of phlebotomine sandflies. Parasitology. 2001;122:37–41. [PubMed]
15. Anderson JM, Oliveira F, Kamhawi S, Mans BJ, Reynoso D, Seitz AE, Lawyer P, Garfield M, Pham M, Valenzuela JG. Comparative salivary gland transcriptomics of sandfly vectors of visceral disease. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Peng Z, Ho MK, Li CH, Simmons FER. Evidence for natural desensitization to mosquito salivary antigens: mosquito saliva specific IgE and IgG levels in children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;93:553–556. [PubMed]
17. Schwartz BS, Ford DP, Childs JE, Rothman N, Thomas RJ. Anti-tick saliva antibody: a biological marker of tick exposure that is a risk factor for Lyme disease seropositivity. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:86–95. [PubMed]
18. Volf P, Grubhoffer L, Hosek P. Characterisation of salivary gland antigens of Triatoma infestans and antigen-specific serum antibody responses in mice exposed to bites of T. infestans. Vet Parasitol. 1993;47:327–337. [PubMed]
19. Hostomska J, Rohousova I, Volfova V, Stanneck D, Mencke N, Volf P. Kinetics of canine antibody response to saliva of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:443–450. [PubMed]

Articles from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene