PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
Diabetologia
 
Diabetologia. 2010 June; 53(6): 1164–1173.
Published online 2010 March 18. doi:  10.1007/s00125-010-1701-4
PMCID: PMC2860566

Role of Ucp1 enhancer methylation and chromatin remodelling in the control of Ucp1 expression in murine adipose tissue

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Increasing the expression of the brown adipose tissue-specific gene uncoupling protein-1 (Ucp1) is a potential target for treating obesity. We investigated the role of DNA methylation and histone modification in Ucp1 expression in adipose cell lines and ex vivo murine adipose tissues.

Methods

Methylation state of the Ucp1 enhancer was studied using bisulphite mapping in murine adipose cell lines, and tissue taken from cold-stressed mice, coupled with functional assays of the effects of methylation and demethylation of the Ucp1 promoter on gene expression and nuclear protein binding.

Results

We show that demethylation of the Ucp1 promoter by 5-aza-deoxycytidine increases Ucp1 expression while methylation of Ucp1 promoter–reporter constructs decreases expression. Brown adipose tissue-specific Ucp1 expression is associated with decreased CpG dinucleotide methylation of the Ucp1 enhancer. The lowest CpG dinucleotide methylation state was found in two cyclic AMP response elements (CRE3, CRE2) in the Ucp1 promoter and methylation of the CpG in CRE2, but not CRE3 decreased nuclear protein binding. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed the presence of the silencing DiMethH3K9 modification on the Ucp1 enhancer in white adipose tissue and the appearance of the active TriMethH3K4 mark at the Ucp1 promoter in brown adipose tissue in response to a cold environment.

Conclusions/interpretation

The results demonstrate that CpG dinucleotide methylation of the Ucp1 enhancer exhibits tissue-specific patterns in murine tissue and cell lines and suggest that adipose tissue-specific Ucp1 expression involves demethylation of CpG dinucleotides found in regulatory CREs in the Ucp1 enhancer, as well as modification of histone tails.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1701-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.

Keywords: CpG dinucleotide, Methylation, Cyclic AMP response element, Uncoupling protein-1, Adipose tissue

Introduction

Obesity is a major risk factor for the development of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Treatments for obesity have centred on decreasing appetite rather than increasing energy expenditure because humans proved to be refractory to β-adrenergic agonists aimed at inducing an increase in brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis. This was despite promising work in rodents that energy expenditure can be increased by β-selective adrenergic stimulation of the brown fat thermogenic gene, uncoupling protein 1 (Ucp1) [1]. Recently there has been renewed interest in the role of BAT in humans since fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography has revealed the presence of BAT depots in adult humans [2]. Furthermore, human white adipocytes can acquire the molecular features of brown adipocytes [3]. Therefore, increasing the numbers of brown adipocytes in humans has been suggested to be a potential target for treating obesity [4, 5].

We have demonstrated that suppressed adrenergic-sensitive Ucp1 expression in the white adipocyte 3T3-L1 cell line is not the result of inhibition of adrenergic signalling, and can be stimulated by enhancing transcriptional activity from the cyclic AMP response elements (CREs) in BAT genes [4, 5]. Our earlier studies on the ontogenic development of BAT in sheep, suggested that this species was similar to humans in that adrenergic-sensitive Ucp1 expression was suppressed soon after birth [6]. Methylation of CpG dinucleotides in gene promoters is thought to play a key role during the developmental control of cell-specific gene expression in association with histone tail modification to regulate chromatin structure and function [7]. These data suggested to us that gene silencing mechanisms involving DNA methylation of CREs and chromatin remodelling may be important in regulating Ucp1 expression.

BAT is characterised by large numbers of mitochondria, increased fatty acid oxidation and a capacity for high metabolic rate due to the action of Ucp1, which uncouples oxidative phosphorylation [8]. Ucp1 expression is BAT-specific and is regulated by a basal promoter ~250 bp upstream from the start of transcription, a silencer unit at −1000 kb, and a highly conserved 221 bp enhancer element located approximately −2.5 kb from the transcriptional start site in the mouse and rat promoters and −3.9 kb in the human promoter. A number of binding sites for nuclear receptors and bZIP transcriptional factors are located in the enhancer region and have been shown to play functional roles in the stimulation of Ucp1 expression by β-adrenergic and nuclear receptor agonists [9]. Sympathetic stimulation increases Ucp1 expression via protein kinase A-activated binding of cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) to four CREs in the Ucp1 enhancer and promoter regions [10]. The enhancer region also appears to be responsible for tissue-specific expression of Ucp1 [11] through the interaction between PRDM16, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1α) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) acting at the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor response element (PPARE) [12], brown fat regulatory element and the nuclear factor erythroid response element (NF-E2) sites [9].

Methylation of discrete CpGs can modulate the binding of important transcription factors, thereby altering gene expression, including regulating tissue specificity (e.g. leptin and glucose transporter 4 [GLUT4]) [1316]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the consensus CRE motif which contains a CpG dinucleotide is a target for DNA methylation and suppresses gene expression [1719]. Furthermore, the nuclear hormone corepressor, RIP140, increases the assembly of histone methyltransferases on the Ucp1 promoter leading to the methylation of specific CpGs, whereas increased active histone acetylation and decreased repressive histone marks have been reported in Rip140 (nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1, also known as Nrip1)−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts [20].

Adrenergic stimulation and cold stress in rodents increase energy expenditure by stimulating expression of Ucp1 in the interscapular BAT depot during the recruitment of BAT in this depot [21] and by the appearance of brown adipocytes in white adipose tissue (WAT) [8, 22, 23]. The mechanisms underlying the tissue-specific expression of Ucp1 expression are currently unknown. Here we demonstrate that CpG dinucleotide methylation differs between tissues and together with histone modification is involved in the regulation of Ucp1 gene expression.

Methods

Animal experiments Two groups of C57BL/6 mice (Harlan, Loughborough, UK), each consisting of four females, were housed individually in cages measuring 48 × 15 × 13 cm with a 16 h light and 8 h dark cycle with access to bedding material. All groups had access ad libitum to a standard mouse chow diet. Mouse weight and feed consumption were measured at 24 h intervals. One group was kept at 22 ± 2°C for 72 h (control warm-acclimatised group). A second group was kept at 22 ± 2°C for 48 h followed by 8 ± 2°C for 24 h and comprised the cold-acclimatised group. All experiments followed institutional guidelines at the University of Aberdeen and those set out for animal care by the UK Home Office. Animals were killed by concussion followed by cervical dislocation following Home Office guidelines.

Cell culture Medium, sera, vitamins solution and antibiotics/antimycotics were bought from GIBCO BRL (Paisley, UK). 3T3-L1 cells (ECACC, Salisbury, UK) and HIB-1B cells (kindly provided by B. Spiegelman) were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in 5% CO2. For differentiation, HIB-1B cells were cultured to confluence (day 0) and then exposed to the differentiation cocktail (0.5 mmol/l 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 250 nmol/l dexamethasone, 170 nmol/l insulin, 10 nmol/l T3). After 48 h, cells were maintained in medium containing 5% FBS, 170 nmol/l insulin and 10 nmol/l T3 until day 7 for harvest, and this medium was replaced daily. 3T3-L1 cells were cultured to confluence (day 0) and 2 days later, were differentiated as described for HIB-1B cells.

Methylated cytosine mapping Bisulphite conversion of genomic DNA prepared from cells or tissues was carried out essentially as described by Clark et al. [24]. The modified DNA was purified using a desalting column (Promega Wizard DNA Clean-Up system; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) Methylation was quantified by pyrosequencing using Pyro Q-CpG software (Biotage, Charlottesvile, VA, USA) and performed by The Genome Centre, Barts Hospital, London, UK. Primer sequences and descriptions are provided (see Electronic supplementary material [ESM] Table 1), products destined to be pyrosequenced were amplified with 5′-biotin-labelled primers to allow purification before sequencing.

Methylated promoter reporter luciferase assays Ucp1 promoter fragments inserted into pGL3 firefly luciferase reporter vectors [9] were either methylated by incubation with SssI methylase to methylate all CpG residues or mock-methylated by the addition of nuclease-free water instead of SSSI. Vectors were then purified using a QiaQuick kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Vectors were then transfected into 80% confluent HIB-1B and 3T3-L1 cells as previously described [4] using 3 µl/μg DNA of FuGene6 (Roche, Burgess Hill, UK) or 2 µl/μg DNA of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) respectively according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Thirty-six hours later, cells were treated with forskolin in serum-free conditions, harvested after 12 h, and firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured using the Promega Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System. The activity of firefly luciferase was normalised to that of Renilla luciferase.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays Nuclei, prepared as described by Thomas et al. [25] were cross-linked (1% formaldehyde for 10 min), lysed, sonicated and immunoprecipitated with antibodies against TriMethH3K4 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and DiMethH3K9 (Abcam) as described previously [5]. Bound and input fractions were analysed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRTPCR) using the primers given in ESM Table 1. For the suppressed mark (DiMethH3K9) a region of the alpha-fetoprotein (Afp) start site (−82 to +94 bp) was chosen as a positive control because this gene has been shown to be silenced in adult mouse tissues [26]. The positive control for the expressed mark (TriMethH3K4) was the start site of the proline-rich Gla protein (PRGP2), which is a transmembrane protein broadly produced in vertebrates across tissues [27]. The amount of Ucp1 DNA was normalised to the amount of Prgp2 (also known as Prrg2) or Afp start site DNA in the bound and input fractions, quantified by qRTPCR.

Real-time PCR Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells and tissue by use of TRI reagent (Sigma, Poole, UK). Before RTPCR, samples were treated with DNA-free DNase to remove contaminating genomic or plasmid DNA. Complementary DNA was generated using the cDNA synthesis kit from Qiagen. Quantitative RTPCR was performed using Sybr green (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in Rotor Gene 3000 (Corbett Research, Cambridge, UK). The sequences of the primers used for qRTPCR are given in ESM Table 1. Expression levels for all genes were normalised to the internal control; 18S rRNA.

Oligonucleotide binding assay Nuclear extracts for electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) were prepared in the presence of protease and protein phosphatase inhibitors as described by Karmanlidis et al. [4]. The oligonucleotide spanned the Ucp1-CRE3 regulatory element: CRE3 5′CTCCTCTACAGCGTCACAGAGGGTC3′ and CRE2 5′CACTGAACTAGTCGTCACCTTTCCA3′ (CRE motif is in italics). Specific binding was established by coincubating with 10-, 25- and 50-fold excess of unlabelled oligonucleotide. The effect of methylation of the CRE motif in CRE3 and CRE2 was established by coincubating with unlabelled methylated CRE3 5′TCTCCTCTACAGCMEGTCACAGAGGGTC, or methylated CRE2 5′CACTGAACTAGTCMEGTCACCTTTCCA (CMEG shows the position of the methylated CpG). Competing unlabelled oligonucleotides were added 15 min before the addition of labelled probe.

Statistical analysis All the data were analysed with either Student’s t test or two-way analysis of variance.

Results

CpG dinucleotide occurrence in the Ucp1 enhancer To identify potential regulatory CpG dinucleotides in the enhancer region of the Ucp1 promoter across species a BLAST analysis (NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA) against the human and rat genomes was performed using a 621 bp fragment surrounding a 221 bp region of the mouse enhancer that had previously been shown to regulate gene expression in mice (Fig. 1). The first objective was to identify whether this region was homologous across species and the second was to identify CpG dinucleotides of interest and determine if they were also conserved across species. This analysis identified a 94 bp fragment (−2510 bp to −2416 bp) of the mouse enhancer that had 86% homology with the region −3805 bp to −3711 bp upstream of human Ucp1. BLAST analysis also showed two regions of homology with the rat genome. The first was a 196 bp fragment of the mouse enhancer region (−2653 bp to −2457 bp with 83% homology) and the second a 105 bp fragment of the mouse enhancer region which shared 88% homology with another region upstream of the rat Ucp1 gene (−400 bp to −2295 bp). Figure 1 shows these BLAST analyses combined with the previous alignment published by Rim and Kozak [9]. The conservation of this enhancer during eutherian evolution has recently been reported [28], in particular, the eutherian conservation of the two CREs in the enhancer (designated CRE3 and CRE2 by Rim and Kozak) as well as the thyroxine response element and PPARE sequences were noted (Fig. 1). Within the enhancer regions several CpG dinucleotides were identified by observation (Fig. 1) but not a sufficient number to be classed as a CpG island in any of the species, as confirmed using an EMBOSS CpGPlot [29]. Interestingly, the only CpG conserved through the three species was present in the highly conserved CRE3. The human BLAST did not reveal further CpG dinucleotides, although the rat contains a similar quantity of CpGs to the mouse. Six CpG dinucleotides (numbered 1 to 6) in a 460 bp region of the mouse enhancer (−2500 to −2726 from the transcription start site) were selected for studying methylation state using bisulphite mapping. CpG 1 and 2 flanked the 5′ end of the Ucp1enhancer and CpG 5 and 6 flanked the 3′ side. CpG 3 and 4 lay within the Ucp1 enhancer and were part of CRE3 and CRE2 as shown in Fig. 1. By including CpGs beyond the recognised mouse Ucp1 enhancer it may be possible to determine if the observed changes are on discrete CpGs, as has been identified for genes of GLUT4 and leptin [13, 16], or are occurring over a wider area of DNA.

Fig. 1
Location of CpGs and transcription factor binding sites on the Ucp1 enhancer. a Selected CpGs of interest indicated by black flags and numbered 1 to 6 relative to cyclic AMP response element (CRE) sites, CRE2 and CRE4. A selection of transcription factors ...

CpG methylation state in the Ucp1 enhancer in adipocyte cell lines We next employed bisulphite mapping to examine the CpG methylation state of the Ucp1 enhancer in brown HIB-1B and white 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Ucp1 expression was increased ~200-fold (p < 0.001) by treating differentiated HIB-1B cells with forskolin, but the same treatment of 3T3-L1 cells elicited a very much smaller increase in Ucp1mRNA levels (Fig. 2a). The methylation state of the six CpG dinucleotides in the Ucp1 enhancer did not differ between undifferentiated and differentiated HIB-1B or 3T3-L1 cells and there was no effect of forskolin on the methylation of these CpGs in either cell type (results not shown). The pattern of methylation differed between CpG dinucleotide position across the Ucp1 enhancer of HIB-1B cells, with the methylation state at CpG positions 3 and 4 lower (p < 0.05) than at the other CpG dinucleotides (Fig. 2b). Surprisingly, 3T3-L1 cells had significantly lower methylation levels than HIB-1B cells at CpG 1, CpG 4 and CpG 6 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). In contrast, CpG 3 was more methylated in 3T3-L1 cells than in HIB-1B cells (p < 0.001) but there was no significant difference in methylation at CpG 5. To assess the functional importance of methylation state on Ucp1 expression we next examined the effects of 5-aza-deoxycytidine (a methyl transferase inhibitor) which demethylates CpG dinucleotides on Ucp1 methylation and gene expression. Preincubation of 3T3-L1 cells with 5-aza-deoxycytidine significantly reduced DNA methylation by 20–50% at all CpG dinucleotides except at position 4 in the Ucp1 enhancer (Fig. 3a) and increased both control and forskolin-stimulated Ucp1 expression. In HIB-1B cells preincubation with 5-aza-deoxycytidine increased basal Ucp1 expression (Fig. 3b) and inhibited forskolin-dependent induction of Ucp1 expression. We next examined the effect on transcriptional activity of methylating CpG dinucleotides in the Ucp1 promoter by treating with the DNA methyltransferase, SssI, a series of different promoter fragments inserted into pGL3 luciferase reporter plasmids, and then transfected into HIB-1B or 3T3-L1 cells. Successful methylation of the vectors was confirmed by subsequent digestion with a methylation sensitive restriction enzyme (HpaII) and controls were mock-methylated in the absence of SssI. Figure 4a,b shows the four Ucp1 promoter constructs that were examined: construct 1 is the empty vector; construct 2 contains the proximal promoter and CRE 4; construct 3 contains both the proximal promoter and the enhancer (which contains CRE 1, 2 and 3); construct 4 contains the entire 3.1 kb Ucp1 promoter. When transfected into HIB-1B cells, transcription from construct 3 (enhancer plus proximal promoter) showed the highest transcriptional activity with lower activities in constructs 2 (proximal promoter) and 4 (3.1 kb Ucp1 promoter), compared with the control mock-methylated empty vector (construct 1). Addition of forskolin stimulated (p < 0.01) the transcriptional activity of all Ucp1 mock-methylated promoter constructs. SssI methylation downregulated (p < 0.001) the transcriptional activity of all constructs to basal values. When the constructs were transfected into 3T3-L1 cells (Fig. 4b), the transcriptional activity was reduced (p < 0.001) by more than half of that observed in HIB-1B cells and methylation of the luciferase vector again decreased activity to basal levels.

Fig. 2
Ucp1 mRNA expression and CpG dinucleotide methylation of the Ucp1 enhancer in differentiated HIB-1B and 3T3-L1 cells. a Effect of vehicle (white bar) and 10 µmol/l forskolin (black bar) on Ucp1 mRNA abundance normalised to 18S rRNA. b ...
Fig. 3
Effect of 5-aza-deoxycytidine on CpG dinucleotide methylation of the Ucp1 enhancer and Ucp1 mRNA expression in HIB-1B and 3T3-L1 cells. a CpG methylation over positions 1 to 6 of the Ucp1 enhancer in 3T3-L1 cells grown to 80% confluence and treated with ...
Fig. 4
Effect of methylation of pGL3 luciferase reporter constructs containing various fragments of the Ucp1 promoter and transfected into HIB1B and 3T3-L1 cells. a Fold expression of SSSI methylated (Meth) and mock-methylated (Mock) reporter constructs in HIB-1B ...

Effect of cold stress on CpG methylation state in the Ucp1 enhancer in vivo The studies in adipocyte cell lines clearly demonstrated a role for CpG methylation in the control of Ucp1 transcription so we next determined whether there were any in vivo differences in the methylation state of the six CpG dinucleotides in the Ucp1enhancer region between brown and white adipose tissues in mice exposed to a cold environment. Bisulphite mapping of the Ucp1 enhancer region was performed on DNA isolated from four tissues (intrascapular BAT [iBAT]; intrascapular WAT [iWAT]; gonadal WAT [gWAT] and liver) and then analysed by bisulphite mapping and pyrosequencing. The iBAT and iWAT were separated by dissection. Ucp1 expression was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in iBAT compared with iWAT, and very low but clearly present in gWAT. Cold adaptation significantly (p < 0.001) increased Ucp1 mRNA four- to sixfold in all adipose tissues sampled and no expression was observed in the liver, which acted as a control non-Ucp1-expressing tissue (Fig. 5a). There was no effect of cold adaptation on the percentage of CpG dinucleotide methylation in any of the adipose tissues measured but methylation differed considerably between tissue and CpG position (Fig 5b,c). At CpG dinucleotide positions 1–4, iBAT exhibited the lowest methylation state, liver was consistently the highest, and iWAT and gWAT were intermediate (p < 0.01). Methylation at CpG dinucleotide position 5 and 6, in warm-acclimatised mice, was similar in all tissues (Fig. 5c) but in cold-acclimatised mice, methylation in liver significantly (p < 0.01) increased to 92%, although there was no change in the adipose tissues. The two white adipose tissue depots (gWAT and iWAT) showed very similar methylation patterns at all positions despite the higher levels of Ucp1 expression in iWAT. In the adipose tissues, methylation was significantly lower in CpG dinucleotide positions 3 and 4, compared with 1, 2, 5 and 6 (p < 0.05).Since CpG at positions 3 and 4 were within CRE3 and CRE2, respectively, we next established whether methylation of these CpGs in a short double-stranded oligonucleotide with sequences flanking either CRE3 or CRE2, influenced binding of nuclear protein by EMSA. Methylation of the CpG in CRE2 markedly decreased the competition of excess oligonucleotide with nuclear proteins prepared from brown adipocytes (HIB-1B), to bind to the labelled CRE2 unmethylated oligonucleotide (Fig. 6). In contrast, methylation of the CpG in the CRE3 oligonucleotide had no effect on competition with nuclear proteins, suggesting that the methylation of the CpG at position 4, within the CRE2 sequence, may be of functional significance. We next employed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays to establish whether the Ucp1 promoter region was associated with histone marks, indicating either active (TriMethH3K4) or repressed (DiMethH3K9) chromatin states. The start of Ucp1 transcription was examined because the TriMethH3K4 modification is found around the start of transcription of actively transcribed genes and diminishes moving upstream and downstream from this point [30]. In both iBAT and gWAT of warm-acclimatised mice, enrichment of the Ucp1 promoter with this mark was low relative to the control gene, Prgp2 (Fig. 7a). In the cold-adapted group the Ucp1 promoter remained depleted in TriMethH3K4 immunoprecipitates in gWAT but showed great enrichment (p < 0.01) in iBAT, suggesting that the promoter became associated with active chromatin. This result corresponded to the large increase in Ucp1 mRNA expression in iBAT in cold-acclimatised mice. When the chromatin was immunoprecipitated with an antibody against the repressed DiMethH3K9 mark (Fig. 7b), the Ucp1 promoter was depleted of this mark in nuclei from both types of adipose tissue relative to the repressed control gene, Afp start site. Association of the repressed DiMethH3K9 mark with the Ucp1 enhancer region relative to Afp (Fig. 7c) demonstrated that gWAT was enriched compared with iBAT, although this was only significantly different (p < 0.05) in the cold-adapted mice. Taken together the ChIP assay results suggest that the Ucp1 promoter is associated with an active and repressed chromatin state in iBAT and gWAT, respectively, and that cold induces a more active chromatin state around the Ucp1 promoter start site, in line with a rise in Ucp1 expression.

Fig. 5
Effect of cold stress on expression of Ucp1 mRNA and methylation of CpG dinucleotides in the Ucp1 enhancer in different tissues from mice. aUcp1 mRNA abundance normalised to 18S rRNA in iBAT, iWAT, gWAT and liver from mice housed in either warm (22 ± 2°C, ...
Fig. 6
Effect of methylation of the CpG in CRE2 and CRE3 sequences on binding to nuclear proteins. End-labelled oligonucleotide probes containing sequences flanking either CRE2 or CRE3 were incubated in the absence (free) and presence (bound) of nuclear proteins ...
Fig. 7
Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of the association of the Ucp1 promoter with active (TriMethH3K4) and repressed (DiMethH3K9) histone marks. a Immunoprecipitation by TriMethH3K4 of the Ucp1 promoter close to the transcription start site, relative ...

Discussion

In this study we demonstrate that the methylation state of CpG dinucleotides in the Ucp1 enhancer exhibits position-specific and adipose tissue-specific patterns in both cell lines and murine adipose tissue and that promoter methylation has functional importance in the regulation of Ucp1 expression.

CpG dinucleotide methylation state in the Ucp1 enhancer was not altered during either differentiation of white 3T3-L1 and brown HIB-1B pre-adipocytes or treatment with forskolin, despite increased Ucp1 expression, Surprisingly, methylation state was higher at CpG dinucleotide positions 1, 4 and 6 in HIB-1B compared with 3T3-L1 cells, and only clearly lower in HIB-1B cells at position 3. Similar analysis of tissue samples taken in vivo demonstrated that methylation state was consistently lower in BAT compared with WAT and liver, at CpG dinucleotide positions 1–4 in the Ucp1 enhancer. Furthermore, the methylation state of CpG dinucleotides at positions 3 and 4, in the CRE3 and CRE2 sequences, respectively, were the lowest in all tissues, with position 4 within CRE2 being less than 10%. Binding of a labelled oligonucleotide probe containing CRE2 and flanking sequences, to brown adipocyte nuclear proteins, was displaced in a concentration-dependent manner by excess unlabelled probe but not when the excess unlabelled probe was methylated at CpG dinucleotide position 4. A similar study examining a labelled CRE3 oligonucleotide probe failed to observe any decrease in competition with excess unlabelled methylated probe. We have previously demonstrated using EMSA and ChIP that HIB-1B nuclear extracts contain bZip transcription factors, including CREB, which bind to CREs [4, 5], therefore suggesting that methylation of the CpG dinucleotide in the CRE2 sequence, decreases binding of transcription factors.

Further functional evidence that Ucp1 promoter methylation is linked to gene expression was obtained by treatment with 5-aza-deoxycytidine in 3T3-L1 cells. 5-Aza-deoxycytidine treatment decreased methylation of the Ucp1 enhancer in 3T3-L1 cells and significantly increased expression of basal and forskolin-stimulated Ucp1 expression. Furthermore, methylation of luciferase reporter plasmids containing the whole 3.1 kb, or fragments of the Ucp1 promoter, before transfection into HIB-1B or 3T3-L1 cells, inhibited transcriptional activity from the promoter. This effect was greatest for reporter vectors containing just the enhancer and promoter sequences where the CREs are located, providing strong evidence that methylation of CpG dinucleotides in CREs in the Ucp1 promoter, inhibits transcription. Similar evidence for the role of methylation in the control of other genes has been reported [13, 3136].

Global demethylation of the HIB-1B cells with 5-aza-deoxycytidine unexpectedly inhibited forskolin-induced Ucp1 expression, suggesting a role for methylation state of unidentified factors that inhibit brown adipogenesis. Treatment of mouse Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts with 5-aza-deoxycytidine has previously been shown to direct this cell line to the myogenic lineage [37]. Lineage tracing studies have recently discovered that BAT shares a common cell progenitor with muscle and not WAT depot cells, as previously thought [38]. Downregulation of the BAT-specific gene Ucp1 in HIB-1B cells, but not in 3T3-L1 cells, by 5-aza-deoxycytidine may therefore be the result of commitment to a myogenic lineage in the brown adipocyte cell line.

Previous studies have demonstrated that methylation of CpG dinucleotides in CREs inhibits the binding of CREB and transcriptional responses to cAMP [19, 36]. CRE3 and CRE2 have previously been shown to bind CREB and are essential for the maximal response of the gene to adrenergic stimulation [9]. However, the lower CpG methylation states in these CREs were not altered by either short-term (24 h) exposure to cold in vivo or treatment of adipocyte cell lines with forskolin, suggesting that methylation state does not play a role in acute adrenergic-stimulated Ucp1 expression. These two CpGs may be held in a lower state of methylation to allow response to stimuli because they are also 3–15 bases from the PPARE, brown fat regulatory element and NF-E2 response element, all of which have been implicated in the control of brown adipose tissue differentiation [9, 10]. Interestingly, the CpG dinucleotide in position 3 was the only example of methylation state being lower in HIB-1B, the Ucp1-expressing cell line, compared with 3T3-L1 cells.

The ChIP studies demonstrated that the amount of the active TriMethH3K4 mark bound to the proximal Ucp1 promoter increased in iBAT but not in gWAT following cold exposure. Conversely, the Ucp1 promoter in gWAT was more enriched with the repressed DiMethH3K4 histone mark, compared with in iBAT. These results agree with those of Kiskinis et al. [20] suggesting that the control of Ucp1 expression involves modification of histone tails associated with the Ucp1 locus. Enrichment of the enhancer with the repressed histone mark was greater in gWAT than the proximal promoter region, suggesting that histone modification may differ across the 3.1 kb Ucp1 5′ regulatory region.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that CpG methylation of the Ucp1 enhancer exhibits CpG-position and tissue-specific patterns and, using cell lines, that this difference may have functional importance suggesting that the regulation of Ucp1 expression involves chromatin modification. The results identify chromatin remodelling as a plausible target for future research to identify mechanisms to upregulate Ucp1 expression in adipocytes in the search for novel treatments of obesity.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM Table 1(45K, pdf)

Primer pairs employed in quantitative PCR (qPCR), bisulphite mapping PCR and pyrosequencing PCR (PDF 45 kb)

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Thorne (University of Portsmouth) for his advice and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) who funded the project.

Duality of interest The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Abbreviations

BAT
Brown adipose tissue
ChIP
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
CRE
Cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element
CREB
CRE-binding protein
EMSA
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
gWAT
Gonadal white adipose tissue
iBAT
Intrascapular brown adipose tissue
iWAT
Intrascapular white adipose tissue
PGC-1
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator 1
PPARE
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor response element
qRTPCR
Quantitative real-time PCR
WAT
White adipose tissue

References

1. Arch JR. Beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonists: potential, pitfalls and progress. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;440:99–107. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)01421-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Nedergaard J, Bengtsson T, Cannon B. Unexpected evidence for active brown adipose tissue in adult humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;293:E444–452. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00691.2006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Tiraby C, Tavernier G, Lefort C, et al. Acquirement of brown fat cell features by human white adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:33370–33376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305235200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Karamanlidis G, Karamitri A, Docherty K, Hazlerigg DG, Lomax MA. C/EBPbeta reprograms white 3T3-L1 preadipocytes to a Brown adipocyte pattern of gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:24660–24669. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703101200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Karamitri A, Shore AM, Docherty K, Speakman JR, Lomax MA. Combinatorial transcription factor regulation of the cyclic AMP-response element on the Pgc-1alpha promoter in white 3T3-L1 and brown HIB-1B preadipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:20738–20752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.021766. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Lomax MA, Sadiq F, Karamanlidis G, Karamitri A, Trayhurn P, Hazlerigg DG. Ontogenic loss of brown adipose tissue sensitivity to beta-adrenergic stimulation in the ovine. Endocrinology. 2007;148:461–468. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0918. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Cavalli G. Chromatin and epigenetics in development: blending cellular memory with cell fate plasticity. Development. 2006;133:2089–2094. doi: 10.1242/dev.02402. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Cannon B, Nedergaard J. Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:277–359. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Rim JS, Kozak LP. Regulatory motifs for CREB-binding protein and Nfe2l2 transcription factors in the upstream enhancer of the mitochondrial uncoupling protein 1 gene. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:34589–34600. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108866200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Kozak UC, Kopecky J, Teisinger J, Enerback S, Boyer B, Kozak LP. An upstream enhancer regulating brown-fat-specific expression of the mitochondrial uncoupling protein gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:59–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Cassard-Doulcier AM, Gelly C, Bouillaud F, Ricquier D. A 211-bp enhancer of the rat uncoupling protein-1 (UCP-1) gene controls specific and regulated expression in brown adipose tissue. Biochem J. 1998;333(Pt 2):243–246. [PubMed]
12. Seale P, Kajimura S, Spiegelman BM. Transcriptional control of brown adipocyte development and physiological function—of mice and men. Genes Dev. 2009;23:788–797. doi: 10.1101/gad.1779209. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Melzner I, Scott V, Dorsch K, et al. Leptin gene expression in human preadipocytes is switched on by maturation-induced demethylation of distinct CpGs in its proximal promoter. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:45420–45427. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208511200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Stoger R. In vivo methylation patterns of the leptin promoter in human and mouse. Epigenetics. 2006;1:155–162. [PubMed]
15. Yokomori N, Tawata M, Onaya T. DNA demethylation during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells affects the expression of the mouse GLUT4 gene. Diabetes. 1999;48:685–690. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.4.685. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Yokomori N, Tawata M, Onaya T. DNA demethylation modulates mouse leptin promoter activity during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. Diabetologia. 2002;45:140–148. doi: 10.1007/s125-002-8255-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Mancini DN, Rodenhiser DI, Ainsworth PJ, et al. CpG methylation within the 5′ regulatory region of the BRCA1 gene is tumor specific and includes a putative CREB binding site. Oncogene. 1998;16:1161–1169. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201630. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Kroft TL, Jethanandani P, McLean DJ, Goldberg E. Methylation of CpG dinucleotides alters binding and silences testis-specific transcription directed by the mouse lactate dehydrogenase C promoter. Biol Reprod. 2001;65:1522–1527. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod65.5.1522. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Demura M, Bulun SE. CpG dinucleotide methylation of the CYP19 I.3/II promoter modulates cAMP-stimulated aromatase activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;283:127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.12.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Kiskinis E, Hallberg M, Christian M, et al. RIP140 directs histone and DNA methylation to silence Ucp1 expression in white adipocytes. EMBO J. 2007;26:4831–4840. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601908. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Cousin B, Bascands-Viguerie N, Kassis N, et al. Cellular changes during cold acclimatation in adipose tissues. J Cell Physiol. 1996;167:285–289. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199605)167:2<285::AID-JCP12>3.0.CO;2-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Cousin B, Cinti S, Morroni M, et al. Occurrence of brown adipocytes in rat white adipose tissue: molecular and morphological characterization. J Cell Sci. 1992;103(Pt 4):931–942. [PubMed]
23. Guerra C, Koza RA, Yamashita H, Walsh K, Kozak LP. Emergence of brown adipocytes in white fat in mice is under genetic control. Effects on body weight and adiposity. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:412–420. doi: 10.1172/JCI3155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:2990–2997. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.2990. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Thomas J. Isolation and fractionation of chromatin linker histones. In: Gould H, editor. Chromatin. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp. 1–34.
26. Nguyen TT, Cho K, Stratton SA, Barton MC. Transcription factor interactions and chromatin modifications associated with p53-mediated, developmental repression of the alpha-fetoprotein gene. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:2147–2157. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.6.2147-2157.2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Kulman JD, Harris JE, Xie L, Davie EW. Proline-rich Gla protein 2 is a cell-surface vitamin K-dependent protein that binds to the transcriptional coactivator Yes-associated protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:8767–8772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703195104. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Jastroch M, Withers KW, Taudien S, et al. Marsupial uncoupling protein 1 sheds light on the evolution of mammalian nonshivering thermogenesis. Physiol Genomics. 2008;32:161–169. [PubMed]
29. Larsen F, Gundersen G, Lopez R, Prydz H. CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics. 1992;13:1095–1107. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90024-M. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007;129:823–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Christman JK. 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2002;21:5483–5495. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205699. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Stresemann C, Lyko F. Modes of action of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacytidine and decitabine. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:8–13. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23607. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Wabitsch M, Bruderlein S, Melzner I, Braun M, Mechtersheimer G, Moller P. LiSa-2, a novel human liposarcoma cell line with a high capacity for terminal adipose differentiation. Int J Cancer. 2000;88:889–894. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001215)88:6<889::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-N. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Yoshida M, Horinouchi S. Trichostatin and leptomycin. Inhibition of histone deacetylation and signal-dependent nuclear export. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;886:23–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09397.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Yoshida M, Horinouchi S, Beppu T. Trichostatin A and trapoxin: novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function. Bioessays. 1995;17:423–430. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170510. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Zhang X, Odom DT, Koo SH, et al. Genome-wide analysis of cAMP-response element binding protein occupancy, phosphorylation, and target gene activation in human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:4459–4464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501076102. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Taylor SM, Jones PA. Multiple new phenotypes induced in 10T1/2 and 3T3 cells treated with 5-azacytidine. Cell. 1979;17:771–779. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90317-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Seale P, Bjork B, Yang W, et al. PRDM16 controls a brown fat/skeletal muscle switch. Nature. 2008;454:961–967. doi: 10.1038/nature07182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer