There are only three studies published on associations of
IL6 SNPs with COPD. Seifart et al. reported that there was no association of
IL6_−174 with COPD.
11 Broekhuizen et al. did not find an association between
IL6_−174 and a cachexia phenotype in COPD subjects.
23 Recently, Córdoba-Lanús et al. reported that
IL6_−572 but not
IL6_−174 was associated with COPD.
12 All three studies have relatively small sample sizes. The associations of
IL6 SNPs with FEV
1 decline in the current study are novel and are the most significant findings among all the studies we have published utilizing the LHS cohort.
13–16,24–27 To strengthen our initial finding in the LHS, we incorporated an association study of
IL6 SNPs with COPD in the NETT-NAS. All SNPs that were genotyped and in high LD with the
IL6_−174G/C showed significant or borderline association with rapid decline of lung function in the LHS and with COPD in the NETT-NAS. We believe that the strength of the associations, the concordant results with several SNPs in high LD with the
IL6_−174G/C SNP, the available previous functional data on
IL6_−174G/C, the replication in a second population and the biologic plausibility for association provide strong evidence that this is a true association.
We examined the association of IL6 SNPs with IL6 serum levels as well as relationships between IL6 serum levels and lung function decline. We did not find any associations. We also found that adjusting the associations between IL6 SNPs and lung function for serum CRP levels in the LHS had no effect on the strength of the associations (data not shown). Therefore, we did not find evidence that the associations we report were mediated through an influence on production of IL6 or CRP.
Studies that have examined the effects of
IL6 SNPs on IL6 mRNA and protein expression have led to conflicting results. The first reporter gene study demonstrated that a construct containing the −174G allele had higher reporter gene expression in HeLa cells, both under basal conditions and after LPS or IL1 stimulation
10. However, a second reporter gene study showed that a construct containing −174C had higher IL1-induced expression in HeLa cells than that of the −174G construct, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.
28 By comparison of the two different cell types, the authors concluded that there is a cell type-specific regulation of IL6 expression.
28 Nine of the most recently published studies of
IL6 SNPs with circulating IL6 concentrations are summarized in Table E2. A recent meta-analysis of 5659 subjects from seventeen studies concluded that the −174 IL6 SNP was not associated with circulating IL6 levels.
29 There are several explanations for the lack of consistent associations. First, the
IL6_−174G/C polymorphism might not be a strong determinant of serum IL6 levels. Second, the serum half-life of IL6 is short. Serum IL6 levels show marked diurnal variability.
30 The blood samples for IL6 measurement in most studies, including our own, were not taken at a specific time of the day. A third explanation is that the SNPs studied may not be the actual functional SNPs. Recently, Samuel and colleagues have identified a novel
IL6 transcriptional regulatory region (−5307 to −5202) much farther from the transcription initiation site than
IL6_−174
31 This report coupled with more recent identification of a novel functional SNP,
IL6_−6331T/C (rs10499563), with the T allele preferentially binding to Oct-1 transcription factor and producing higher reporter gene expression, provides evidence that additional functional SNPs do exist in
IL6.
32 However, since IL6_−6331T/C is in low LD with IL6_−174, our finding is not likely to be explained by these new functional data.
If
IL6 SNPs are not related to IL6 levels then what is the basis for their association with FEV
1 decline and COPD? One possible explanation is that the association is truly driven via local pulmonary IL6 expression or that it is driven by serum IL6 levels but that the variability and lability of serum IL6 levels obscures this relationship; FEV
1 may reflect the average IL6 levels and thus the degree of lung inflammation over the years of the study. In addition, the SNPs could influence IL6 levels and thus lung inflammation during exacerbations but not the constitutive levels during stable periods. IL6 is a pleiotropic cytokine which also modulates expression of many other genes.
33 It may be that it is the effect of the
IL6 variants on these genes that is the underlying mechanism for the associations we observed.
How can we explain the observation that
IL6 SNPs were not associated with baseline FEV
1 in the LHS but were associated with the presence of COPD in the NETT-NAS study? The mean age of the LHS participants was 48 years as opposed to a mean age of 68 years for the NETT-NAS participants. Baseline FEV
1 at age 48 is influenced both by maximal attained FEV
1 at ~ 25 years of age and by the rate of decline of lung function after age 25.
34 However, the relative contribution of rate of decline in lung function will be much greater by age 68 than at age 48. Thus, FEV
1 at age 68 in the NETT-NAS participants is likely to largely reflect the rate of decline of lung function during their long smoking history whereas there is likely a weaker relationship of FEV
1 decline and baseline lung function at age 48.
Compared with previous studies, strengths of this study include larger sample size and good power. This sample size has adequate power to detect common genetic risk variants as shown in our previous power analyses, for example, it has 80% power to detect a relative risk of 2.0 when the frequency of the risk factor is 10% or above.
22There are several potential limitations of this study. Firstly, population stratification could have led to false-positive results. However, it has been reported that significant false-positive associations are unlikely to arise from population stratification in the non-Hispanic white population, especially in well-designed, moderately-sized, case-control studies such as ours.
35 In addition, there was no significant evidence of population stratification in the NETT-NAS cases and controls.
17 Second, false positive results might have arisen from multiple comparisons. However the consistent results in the NETT-NAS replication study make false positive results unlikely. Third, we have not identified the causal SNP for the associations. The identification of a novel functional SNP
IL6_−6331T/C (rs10499563), which has low LD with IL6_−174G/C (rs1800795) with r
2 of 0.169 in the CEU HapMap database, indicates that the control of IL6 transcription is likely to be complex.
32 We cannot exclude the possibility that SNPs other than the
IL6_−174G/C are also causal SNPs. Finally, serum IL6 levels were measured at year 5 of the LHS, therefore it may not be appropriate to link IL6 levels at year 5 with the baseline FEV
1 as well as the rate of decline of FEV
1 during 5 year follow-up.
In summary, we report associations of IL6 variants with rate of decline of lung function and with smoking-induced COPD.