PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Sch Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 22.
Published in final edited form as:
J Sch Psychol. 2006 February 1; 44(1): 31–49.
doi:  10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.001
PMCID: PMC2858399
NIHMSID: NIHMS193617

Retention of Hispanic/Latino students in first grade: Child, parent, teacher, school, and peer predictors

Abstract

A sample of 283 Hispanic children with literacy performance at entrance to first grade below the median for their school district was studied as part of a larger research project on the predictors of grade retention in grade 1. Following retention decisions, 51 Hispanic students were retained in first grade. Low literacy skills, being young at entrance to first grade, low ego resilience, low support in the teacher–student relationship, and parents’ low sense of responsibility for their children’s educational outcomes predicted retention decisions. Hierarchical logistics regression investigated the contribution of six categories of variables (academic competencies; socio-demographic characteristics; social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment; resiliency, school context; and home environment) to retention. Controlling for literacy, only being young for grade and parents’ low sense of responsibility for their children’s adjustment to school made a direct contribution to retention. Early literacy skills were higher for children enrolled in bilingual classrooms than for children in non-bilingual classrooms. Implications for educational policy are discussed.

Keywords: Hispanic, Latino, Grade retention, Achievement, Elementary students

Although Hispanic/Latino (H/L) children have made gains on several key indicators of educational attainment in the past 20 years, significant gaps in academic performance between H/L and White (non-H/L) students remain. According to the U. S. Department of Education’s National Center for Educational Statistics report (2003), H/L students are more likely to be retained in grade than are White students and have the highest percentage of non-school completion of any ethnic group. In 1999, 13% of H/L students in K-12th grade had repeated at least one grade, compared to 9% of White and 18% of Black students.

The finding that H/L children are more likely to be retained in grade than are White children takes on added meaning in light of empirical research that documents an association between grade retention and lower subsequent achievement, including non-completion of school (for reviews see Holmes, 1989; Jimerson, 2001). Grade retention refers to a student repeating a grade after spending an academic year in that grade. The strong association between repeating a grade and dropping out of school before graduation remains after statistical adjustments for pre-retention differences (Alexander, Entwisle, & Dauber, 2003; Grissom & Shepard, 1989; Holmes, 1989). Although some studies report positive effects of grade retention on achievement and behavior (Pierson & Connell, 1992), many well designed studies utilizing controls for pre-retention differences document a range of negative effects (Meisels & Liaw, 1993; Pagani, Tremblay, Vitaro, Boulerice, & McDuff, 2001; Reynolds, 1992). Jimerson’s (2001) comprehensive meta-analysis concluded that retention has generally negative average effects on both academic and psychosocial functioning. Furthermore, retention in first grade appears to have more negative long-term effects than retention in later grades (Pagani et al., 2001).

To our knowledge, no prospective study utilizing well-matched controls has investigated the effect of grade retention on a large sample of H/L children from multiple informant sources. White students are the majority of students in several studies (Jimerson, 2001), African-American students in others (Alexander et al., 2003; McCoy & Reynolds, 1999). When H/L students have been included in studies, their numbers were too few to conduct within-Hispanic group analyses of relationships between retention and child outcomes. Reynolds (1992) found that H/L students fared worse than African-American children following retention in first grade, but with only 10 retained H/L students, these results must be interpreted with caution.

Predictors of grade retention

A number of studies have investigated factors that predict grade retention (Alexander, Entwisle, & Dauber, 1994; Beebe-Frankenberger, Bocian, MacMillan, & Gresham, 2004; Byrnes & Yamamoto, 1985; Dauber, Alexander, & Entwisle, 1993; Jimerson, Carlson, Rotert, Egeland, & Sroufe, 1997; Mantzicopoulos, 2003; Meisels & Liaw, 1993). These studies document that low academic achievement is the most consistent predictor of grade retention in the elementary grades. Because achievement is correlated with many other factors that also predict grade retention, it is important to investigate factors that predict grade retention independent of the effect of low achievement. Recent studies on the correlates of grade retention have either compared retained students to similarly low-achieving comparison students (Beebe-Frankenberger et al., 2004; Jimerson et al., 1997) or statistically controlled for achievement or cognitive ability differences between retained and promoted students (Dauber et al., 1993; Mantzicopoulos, 2003; McCoy & Reynolds, 1999). Among these studies, the most consistent predictors of being retained in grade are being male (Dauber et al., 1993; Jimerson et al., 1997), young for grade (Mantzicopoulos, 2003), low parental involvement in school (Jimerson et al., 1997; Mantzicopoulos, 2003; McCoy & Reynolds, 1999), conflict in relationships with teachers (Pianta, Steinberg, & Rollins, 1995), and behavior problems (Jimerson et al., 1997; Mantzicopoulos, 2003). Results are inconsistent for parental SES, with some researchers finding a negative association between SES and grade retention (Dauber et al., 1993) after controlling for student ability or achievement, and others failing to find such an association (Beebe-Frankenberger et al., 2004; Jimerson et al., 1997).

Studies on predictors of grade retention in the early grades have generally included various ethnic groups but have not reported whether the associations between predictor variables and retention were of similar magnitude for different ethnic groups. Given the over-representation of Hispanic/Latino students in statistics on grade retention and the paucity of data to support the use of grade repetition for academic improvement, it is important to determine factors that predict grade retention in the early grades for H/L students.

To our knowledge, only one published study has investigated predictors of grade retention for H/L samples (Cosden, Zimmer, & Tuss, 1993). These investigators studied age of entry to kindergarten and gender as predictors of kindergarten retention in Anglo and Latino (their designations) populations. Their study included 68 retained Latino kindergartners and 895 promoted Latino kindergartners in three southern California school districts. Overall, the retention rate was 7%, an odds ratio of about 1:13 of being retained. The odds of being retained increased for being young and male, but school district demographics and practices moderated these associations. Latino children were likely to be younger at entry to school than were White children, presumably because White parents were more likely than Latino children to delay school entrance. Furthermore, these ethnic group differences in age at entry contributed to the higher prevalence of grade retention for Latino children, relative to White children, especially in schools where Latinos were in the minority. Because no individual child, school, teacher, or parent variables were investigated in their study, the conclusions are limited to district and overall sample associations between age, ethnicity, and retention in kindergarten.

A detailed investigation of predictors of grade retention among H/L children would fill an important gap in the retention literature. Garcia Coll et al. (1996) and Johnson et al. (2003) have argued that studies conducted within specific cultural contexts are required to study within-group differences that account for children’s developmental outcomes. Children categorized as Hispanic or Latino differ considerably on variables such as acculturation, language, and SES that are related to academic performance and that may be associated with grade retention, above the effect of achievement. The current study involves a pool of H/L students large enough to permit testing of models that may be different for important subgroups within the H/L sample, specifically English and Spanish Language proficiency, acculturation, participation in educational programs for bilingual learners, and the percentage of Hispanic students in a school.

The purpose of this study is to investigate predictors of being retained following first grade in an academically at-risk sample of H/L youth. We are particularly interested in variables that contribute to grade retention status above children’s academic competencies. Specifically, we are interested in the contribution of five categories of variables to retention decisions, above student academic competencies. These categories are socio-demographic characteristics; social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment; academic resiliency; school context; and home environment. The variables included in each category and descriptive information for the study sample are found in Table 1. These categories were selected to represent broad dimensions known to be predictive of school success among elementary grades or to have particular relevance to H/L students.

Table 1
Descriptive statistics for all study variables (N =283)

The inclusion of variables most consistently investigated in previous grade retention studies (e.g., achievement, intelligence, economic adversity, gender, age, parent involvement, mobility, relationship with teachers, and behavioral adjustment) permits a comparison of results from this study with results from studies with mixed ethnic or predominantly Caucasian or African-American samples. Also investigated are variables less frequently investigated in the retention literature, specifically effortful control and ego resilience. Effortful control is defined as “the efficiency of executive attention, including the ability to inhibit a dominant response and/or to activate a subdominant response, to plan, and to detect errors” (Rothbart and Bates, in press, cited by Eisenberg et al., 2005). A strong literature supports the importance of effortful control to early school success (Eisenberg et al., 2003; Kochanska & Knaack, 2003; Spira & Fischel, 2005). The ego resilient individual is resourceful and flexible, adjusts to changes in the environment quickly, and recovers quickly from stress. High ego resilient children are agreeable and socially competent (Block & Block, 1980; Cumberland-Li, Eisenberg, & Reiser, 2004; Huey & Weisz, 1997).

Variables of particular relevance to H/L students include acculturation, placement in bilingual education classrooms, and the percentage of H/L students in the school. Relevant aspects of acculturation include cultural characteristics of one’s social group, time spent in the United States, and language use (Balcazar, Casto, & Krull, 1995). According to a recent study conducted by the U.S. Department of Education (2003), H/L students who are born in the United States have a lower drop out rate than do H/L students not born in the United States. Among H/L students participating in an academic development program, higher levels of acculturation predicted greater academic gains (Riggs & Greenberg, 2004). Limited English proficiency and a belief that teachers, not parents, are responsible for making educational decisions about children (Chavkin & Williams, 1993) may reduce the likelihood that low acculturated H/L parents would challenge the school’s decision to retain a child in grade. Bilingual instruction is an important issue for Spanish-dominant children. In a recent study of several school districts, Spanish-dominant children placed in bilingual classrooms outperformed similar students in English-immersion programs over the course of their schooling (Thomas & Collier, 2002). As discussed above, H/L students were retained at a higher rate in schools in which H/L students constitute a minority of the student population (Cosden et al., 1993).

Methods

Sample

Participants were 283 (48.1% male) H/L children attending one of three Texas School districts (1 urban, 2 small city). Participants were drawn from a larger longitudinal study examining the impact of grade retention on academic achievement. A total of 503 H/L children were recruited into the larger study across two sequential cohorts in first grade during fall, 2001 and fall, 2002. Children were eligible to participate in the longitudinal study if they scored below the median score for their district on a state approved district-administered measure of literacy, administered in the child’s dominant language, as assessed by the school district. Of those children eligible to participate in the study, written parental consent was obtained for 295 (59%). Children with and without consent differed on age, with non-consenters younger (t =11.28, df =307.38, p <0.001), and of Limited English Proficient (LEP) status, with LEP students more likely to participate (chi square =13.03, p <0.001). Children with and without consent did not differ on gender (chi square =0.851, p >0.65), or economic disadvantage (free or reduced lunch status; chi square =5.66, p >0.05). Of these 295 children, two moved away prior to any assessments, the retention status for 10 could not be determined because the child moved after some assessment and could not be located, 51 were retained in 1st grade, and 232 were promoted. Thus, results are reported for the 283 children with data on retention status. Table 1 reports descriptive data for all study variables for the 283 children.

Not all subjects have data on all variables. By source, more data were missing for parent-provided data (45%) than for data by any other source (Teacher, 16% missing; District, 16% missing; peer, 18% missing; child performance data, 2% missing). Thus, in order to facilitate comparisons across analyses involving different sources of data, we used NORM (Schafer, 1999) to impute missing data, with the exception of missing parent data. It was deemed inappropriate to impute missing parent data due to the magnitude of missing data and to the likelihood that parent data were not missing at random.

Of the 158 parents who responded to home–school relationship variables, 128 provided information on where they spent their early life: only in the US (71), US and some time in Latin America or the Caribbean (17), only in Latin America or the Caribbean (33), and mostly or equally in Latin America or the Caribbean (7).

Data collection procedures

During the late Fall and early Spring of first grade, bilingual research staff individually administered the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (Bracken & McCallum, 1998), the Woodcock–Munoz Language Survey (WMLS, Woodcock & Munoz-Sandoval, 2001), and either the WJ-III Tests of Achievement (WJ-III; Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001) or Batería Woodcock–Muñoz: Pruebas de aprovechamiento-Revisada (Batería-R; Woodcock & Munoz, 1996). The choice of the WJ-III or the Batería was based on the child’s performance on the WMLS (see below). Children’s effortful control (Kochanska, Murray, & Coy, 1997) was assessed in a second individual session at school. Sociometric (peer) assessments were conducted during the Spring semester. Teacher-report and parent-report data were collected via questionnaires sent to teachers and parent during April and May. Teachers and parents received $25.00 for completing and returning each student questionnaire. Parents received both English and Spanish language versions of all correspondence mailed to them, including the questionnaire. Spanish assessments were translated and back-translated using standard translation procedures. Bilingual research staff attempted to contact non-responding parents by phone to encourage them to return the questionnaire and to offer the option of completing the questionnaire via a telephone interview. Only five parents opted for the telephone interview.

Determination of language for testing

The WMLS was administered to determine language for all child assessments. It has two forms (English and Spanish) that are individually administered, each consisting of four subtests that provide a broad sampling of proficiency in oral language, reading, and writing. The test yields an overall measure of language competence and a Cognitive-Academic Language Proficiency (CALP) score for English and Spanish. The internal consistency reliability estimates, as reported in the manual, range from 0.94 to 0.97 for the Broad Ability scores. Children were tested in the language in which their CALP score was higher. If English and Spanish CALP scores were identical, the child was tested in English. A total of 99 children were tested in Spanish.

Measures

Academic competencies

Cognitive ability

Children were individually tested at school with the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT; Bracken & McCallum, 1998). The UNIT is administered with the use of culturally and linguistically universal hand and body gestures without any use of receptive or expressive language. It measures general intelligence by measuring complex memory and reasoning abilities. We used the abbreviated version of the UNIT, which yields a full scale IQ that is highly correlated (r =0.91) with scores obtained with the full battery and which has demonstrated good test–retest and internal consistency reliabilities as well as construct validity (Bracken & McCallum, 1998; Hooper, 2003).

Achievement (reading and math)

The WJ-III Tests of Achievement (Woodcock et al., 2001) is an individually administered measure of academic achievement. We used the WJ-III Broad Reading W Scores (Letter-Word Identification, Reading Fluency, Passage Comprehension subtests) and the WJ-III Broad Math W Scores (Calculations, Math Fluency, and Math Calculation Skills subtests). W scores are based on the Rasch measurement model, yielding an equal interval scale. Extensive research documents the reliability and construct validity of the WJ-III and its predecessor (Woodcock & Johnson, 1989; Woodcock et al., 2001).

The Batería Woodcock–Muñoz: Pruebas de aprovechamiento-Revisada (Woodcock & Munoz, 1996) is the comparable Spanish version of the Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised (WJ-R; Woodcock & Johnson, 1989), the precursor of the WJ-III. The Woodcock Compuscore (Woodcock & Muñoz-Sandoval, 2001) program yields W scores for the Batería-R that are comparable to W scores on the WJ-R. The Broad Reading and Broad Mathematics W Scores were used in this study. For descriptive purposes, we note that the mean age standard scores for Broad Reading and Broad Math were 99.05 (S.D. =20.32) and 98.68 (S.D. =13.85), respectively.

Teacher perception of achievement

Teachers were asked to describe child-participants’ academic performance on 3 items using a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 6 (almost always). The items were “Performing academically at grade level”, “Able to read grade level material and answer questions about what he/she has read” and “Able to solve grade level math problems”. The internal consistency (alpha) of the scale for this sample was 0.94.

Teacher-rated engagement

Teachers rated children’s classroom engagement on a 10-item scale, using a 1–5 rating scale (Hughes & Kwok, 2005). Example items include: “Is a reliable worker”, “Perseveres until the task if finished”, and “Sets and works toward goals”. The internal consistency of these 10 items for our sample was 0.95.

Socio-demographic variables

Child’s age at entrance to first grade, gender, and eligibility for free or reduced lunch (coded 0 if not eligible and 1 if eligible) were obtained from school records.

Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment

Peer ratings

In individual interviews, research assistants asked children to nominate as few or as many classmates as they wished who could best play each of several parts in a class play (Masten, Morison, & Pelligrini, 1985). Of interest to this study are the aggression (start fights, say mean things, or hit others), hyperactive (do strange things and make a lot of noise; they bother people who are trying to work), and emotional symptoms (cry a lot and look sad) items. Each child in the classroom received a score on each item based on the number of nominations received. Children were also asked to nominate as many children as they wished whom they “liked the most” and were asked to rate each child in the classroom on a 1–5 scale with respect to their liking for the child. A rating of “1” was considered equivalent to a liked-least nomination score (Asher & Dodge, 1986) for purposes of computing social preference scores (Coie, Dodge, & Coppotelli, 1982). All sociometric scores were standardized within classrooms. To assure reliability of scores, sociometric scores were computed only for children located in classrooms in which more than 40% of classmates participated in the sociometric assessment (Terry, 1999). Procedures similar to these have demonstrated good test–retest reliabilities and construct validity (Hughes, 1990).

Teacher ratings

Teachers completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ, Goodman, 2001), a brief (25-item) screening measure for psychopathology. Each item is rated on a 0–2 scale (i.e., not true, somewhat true, certainly true). The SDQ yields five scales (conduct problems, hyperactivity, emotional problems, peer problems, and prosocial), each consisting of 5 items. All but the peer problems scale were used in this study. The SDQ has good evidence of internal consistency, factor structure, and predictive validity (Goodman, 2001). To reduce the number of variables in the analyses, composite variables were developed for aggression, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, and peer acceptance. In each case, the composite was computed as the mean of the standardized scores for the relevant SDQ scale and the corresponding peer nomination score. For the peer acceptance, the prosocial scale of the SDQ and the peer social preference score were used. All correlations between the teacher and peer ratings were statistically significant at <0.001.

Academic resiliency

Effortful control

The voluntary or effortful aspects of children’s self-regulation were assessed using 4 observational tasks assessing motor inhibition from a behavioral battery designed by Kochanska et al. (see Kochanska et al., 1997; Murray & Kochanska, 2002). In each of the 4 tasks (Walk-a-Line, Telephone Poles, Star, and Circle) children were asked to voluntarily inhibit their fine or gross motor behavior by completing each of the tasks as slowly as possible. The duration (in seconds) that it took children to complete tasks represented scores for effortful control. In our sample, this measure of effortful control showed good factorial validity and was moderately correlated with measures of achievement and externalizing problems (Liew & Hughes, 2005).

Ego resiliency

The measure of ego resiliency was derived from a 15-item scale of ego control and ego resiliency adapted from the California Child Q-Set, a language simplified personality inventory for use by nonprofessionals (Caspi, Block, Block, & Klopp, 1992). Exploratory and Confirmatory factor analysis conducted on participants in the larger study identified four factors: prosocial, antisocial, ego resilient, and ego brittle. Because the ego resilient and ego brittle factors were moderately correlated, items on both factors were combined to form a single ego resilient scale. Example of positive items include resourceful in initiating activities; self reliant; and persistent. Example of negative items include rigidly repetitive, falls to pieces under stress, and emotionally labile. The resulting alpha for this scale for the study sample was 0.85.

School context

Bilingual status (0= non-bilingual, 1=bilingual) and school percentage of Hispanic students were provided by the participating school district. Of the 106 children in bilingual classes, 98 were tested in Spanish.

Teacher-rated support and conflict

The 22-item Teacher Relationship Inventory (TRI; Hughes, Cavell, & Willson, 2001) is based on the Network of Relationships Inventory (NRI; Buhrmester & Furman, 1987), a child-report measure of relationship quality. Teachers indicate on a 5-point Likert-type scale their level of support (16 items) or conflict (6 items) in their relationships with individual students. In our sample, internal consistency reliabilities (alphas) were 0.92 for Support and 0.94 for Conflict. The TNRI has good evidence of construct validity (Hughes & Kwok, 2005; Meehan, Hughes, & Cavell, 2003).

Home environment

Acculturation

Parents completed a 5-item acculturation scale (Balczar, Castro, & Krull, 1995) that asks parents to report on their use of English and Spanish for speaking and reading, the country in which they spent their early life, the ethnicity of members of their social network, and their attitude toward being H/L. In previous research the scale has predicted health-related attitudes and outcomes (Balczar et al., 1995). The internal consistency in our sample was 0.78.

Parent involvement in education

The parent report of involvement scale consisting of 23 items were adapted from the Parent–Teacher Involvement Questionnaire (Kohl, Lengua, & McMahon, 2000) and 6 additional items covering parent perceived parental self-efficacy and roles. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis on participants in the larger study found good support for each of the four theoretically derived dimensions of parent involvement—Positive Perceptions about School, Communication, Parent–Teacher Shared Responsibilities, and Parent–School-Based Involvement (Wong, 2005). Reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency for the four subscales (ranging from 0.72 to 0.93).

Parent expectations for achievement

Parents were asked to indicate the highest level of education they expected their child to complete, from elementary school (1) to doctoral or professional degree (10). This single question has been found to make a unique contribution to the prediction of children’s achievement (Ma, 2001).

Design and analysis

The focus of the design was to discern important predictors of retention for H/L first grade children. Hierarchical logistic regression (Cohen, Cohen, West, & Aiken, 2003) was employed with SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., 1989–2004). The effects of five academic competencies were examined as a block to establish their effects on retention. These were Unit IQ, Broad Reading, Broad Math, and teacher-rated engagement and achievement. Then, each variable in each of the five additional variable sets of interest was added singly in a second block to determine its partial contribution to retention beyond the prediction of the academic competencies block, as well as the total contribution of that block. Statistical tests of improvement in Nagelkirke R2 were evaluated with the chi square statistic for the regression by adding the second block (or individual predictor) to the first block of predictors. Degrees of freedom for each chi square were based on the number of predictors for the model or for the block.

Parent data were of necessity, considered separately since there was a significant amount of missing data. It was not reasonable to impute such data under an assumption of missingness-at-random (MAR), required for multiple imputation. The data set included 158 children, with only 27 missing data points within the data set. Multiple imputation using NORM (Schafer, 1999) was conducted within the data set using all variables to estimate the missing data points in the parent data. The imputed scores from the previous analysis were retained to maintain a consistent data set with respect to the cognitive and reading variables.

Results

Summary statistics for each variable in the study are presented in Table 1 along with the correlation with retention (either a point biserial for interval variables or Pearson association for binary variables). Academic competency variables correlating significantly (p <0.05) with retention included Broad Reading, teacher-rated achievement, and teacher-rated engagement. For each, retained children had a lower score. For socio-demographic characteristics, only age was correlated significantly with retained students younger. For academic resilience factors, ego resilience correlated significantly with retention, retained children scoring lower. No social/emotional/behavioral measures correlated significantly with retention. Among school context variables only teacher-rated support was significantly correlated, lower for retained students.

The results of the hierarchical logistic regression predicting retention for cognitive and achievement, socio-demographic, academic resiliency, social/emotional/behavioral, and school context variables are given in Table 2. The first block variables of Reading and Math W scores, teacher engagement and achievement ratings, and UNIT IQ score produced a significant (p <0.001) prediction with R2 of 0.275. Individually, reading and the teacher ratings of achievement and engagement were individually significant predictors (p <0.001), with lower scores associated with retained children for each.

Table 2
Hierarchical logistic regression analyses predicting retention from child and school variables

The additional contribution of the socio-demographic block to the first block produced a significant improvement in R2 of 0.056, p <0.01. The only individual predictor in this block that produced significant increases in R2 was age (p <0.005), with retained children younger than promoted children.

The academic resiliency measures of ego resiliency and effortful control did not produce a statistically significant increase in R2 (p >0.76), and neither ego resilience nor effortful control was individually predictive beyond the first block.

Child social, emotional, and behavioral variables did not contribute as a block (p >0.63), nor did any of the individual variables in the block. School context variables did not significantly improve prediction of retention (p >0.88), nor did any individual predictors in the block add significantly to R2.

Analyses involving sample with parent report data

Separate hierarchical logistic regressions of home environment variables, reported in Table 3, were conducted for the 158 children whose parents provided information on home–school variables. First we tested comparability of the sample with parent data on home–school variables and the sample of 125 children without parent data. The sample of 158 children with complete parent data on home–school variables did not differ multivariately from the 125 children whose parents provided only partial or no home–school responses (F =1.71, df =5, 277) on the cognitive and achievement variables employed as the first model for analyses.

Table 3
Hierarchical logistic regression analyses predicting retention from home environment

The first block of predictors employed the same cognitive and achievement variables as included in the previous regressions. The R2 for these five variables was 0.307, slightly higher than the 0.275 in the full sample. The block of home environment variables increased R2 to 0.427, an increase of 0.120 (p <0.002). Among the individual predictors in the block, parent rating of shared responsibility for children’s education was significant (p =0.01), with parents of retained students reporting less responsibility for their children’s academic and behavioral performance in school.

Supplementary analyses involving bilingual instruction

Given our findings concerning the pivotal role of early literacy in retention decisions and questions in the literature regarding effective school practices for language minority students (Thomas & Collier, 2002), we conducted supplementary analyses to further investigate the role of child bilingual class placement in early literacy. Children were placed by the schools in bilingual or non-bilingual (English only) programs by district placement procedures. The bilingual programs can be best represented as 80/20 Spanish/English language of instruction. Bilingual classroom placement overlapped the test language assessment status in our study. Specifically, of the 106 students in bilingual classes, 99 were tested in Spanish and 7 in English (based on children’s performance on the WMLS), while of the 184 non-bilingual students, 183 were tested in English and 1 in Spanish. First we examined whether bilingual class placement was associated with Reading. Children in bilingual classrooms had higher Reading scores than did children in English only classrooms (t =5.402, df =149.96, p <0.001).

The superior reading performance of children in bilingual classrooms is a reflection of the greater language proficiency of children tested in Spanish. Specifically, children tested in Spanish had a mean difference score on the Woodcock–Munoz in Spanish over English of 1.74 points, a highly significant difference (t =24.05, df =90, p <0.001), with mean Spanish score of 4.19 (S.D.= 0.80) and English score of 2.46 (S.D.=0.85). The 9 students given the WMLS and tested in English had a difference of English over Spanish of only 1.17 points (t =3.13, df =8, p <0.02), with mean Spanish score of 1.78 (S.D.=1.06) and English score of 2.94 (S.D. =1.07). The difference in the absolute magnitude of the Spanish–English difference for those 98 children administered the WMLS was significant in a repeated measures analysis with Spanish–English scores as the within-subject factor and language tested in as the between-subject factor; the interaction F-statistic was 126.12 (df = 1, 100; p <0.001).

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors of being retained following first grade in an academically at-risk sample of H/L youth. We were especially interested in comparing results obtained with this sample with results from studies conducted with mixed or predominantly African-American or White-Non-Hispanic samples and in examining variables of particular relevance to H/L youth. First each variable’s unconditional association with retention was examined. Second, a series of hierarchical logistics regressions examined the contribution of each of six classes of variables to retention, above the effects of children’s academic competencies.

Unconditional analyses

The findings regarding the unconditional associations between predictors and retention contain several expected results. H/L children subsequently retained in first grade have lower literacy skills. Retained children are also young for grade, a finding consistent with results of research with non-H/L (Mantzicopoulos, 2003) and H/L samples (Cosden et al., 1993). Retained children were rated by their teachers as less engaged, achieving at a lower level in the classroom, less ego resilient, and as experiencing less teacher support, and their parents reported a lower sense of shared responsibility for their child’s success in school.

The unconditional results are, perhaps, more noteworthy for the lack of an association with retention for many predictors commonly found in previous studies. Retained children were no more likely to be male, to be eligible for free or reduced lunch, to perform lower on a measure of cognitive reasoning, to have lower math skills, to exhibit social, emotional, or behavioral problems, or to experience conflict in their relationships with teachers. The failure to replicate findings with respect to predictors of retention reported in studies with low achieving, non-H/L samples suggests the causes of early school failure may differ for H/L and non-H/L students. The lack of statistically significant associations between measures of child externalizing problems (e.g., aggression and teacher-rated conflict) and grade retention may be a result of generally low levels of conduct problems among H/L elementary children, relative to African-American children (Graham & Juvonen, 2002; Hughes, Gleason, & Zhang, 2005).

The lack of an association between eligibility for free or reduced lunch and retention may be explained by the high percentage (81.7) of our sample whose family incomes made them eligible for free or reduced lunch, thereby restricting variance, and due to the lack of sensitivity of this index to levels of economic adversity.

UNIT IQ scores were not predictive of grade retention. The UNIT developers report correlation coefficients between the UNIT memory IQ and reasoning IQ and Woodcock–Johnson-Revised (WJ-R) broad cognitive ability score of 0.52 and 0.63, respectively when administered to 104 1st–10th grade students (Reed & McCallum, 1995). In our H/L sample, the correlation between the UNIT IQ and Broad Reading and Broad Math were substantially smaller (0.25 and 0.14, respectively). Although the sample in the present study is relatively low achieving, the failure to find an association between the UNIT and grade retention is unlikely due to a restriction of range of ability, as the sample’s UNIT IQ (M =94; S.D.= 13.4) is within the average range and has adequate dispersion. Together, these findings suggest further research is needed on the validity of the UNIT with H/L samples.

Conditional analyses

When the five academic competency variables were entered as a block, in Model 1, only Broad Reading made a direct contribution to grade retention. The finding that teacher perceptions of children’s classroom learning and engagement did not make a direct contribution to retention is explained, in part, by the fact that teacher perceptions are substantially correlated with children’s measured reading competence (r =0.58 for teacher perceptions of learning and 0.44 for teacher perceptions of engagement, p <0.001). Similarly, because ego resilience and supportive relationship with one’s teacher are significantly correlated with children’s Broad Reading scores (r = 0.39 and 0.21, respectively; p <0.01), these variables may influence grade retention indirectly, through their direct effect on achievement.

In a series of hierarchical logistical regressions, theoretically important sets of variables were entered in a second block, after the academic competence block. Beyond academic competencies (primarily Reading), only age and parents’ sense of shared responsibility for their child’s learning and behavior in school made unique contributions to the prediction of retention. Children who enter public school younger than classmates perform less well than their classmates academically and socially, at least in the early grades (Stipek & Byler, 2001). H/L children often start school younger than do Caucasian children (Cosden et al., 1993), and H/L parents are less likely to delay school entrance based on low readiness skills (Diamond, Reagan, & Bandyk, 2000). Furthermore, H/L students are less likely to have attended an academically oriented preschool than are Caucasian or African-American children (Magnuson & Waldfogel, 2005). Thus, H/L students may have had less opportunity to develop early literacy skills that predict success in first grade classrooms.

Perhaps the most important finding is the negative association between parents’ sense of shared responsibility for their child’s academic and behavioral success in school and grade retention. Items on this scale ask parent the degree to which they believe parents are responsible for solving the child’s learning and behavior problems at school, making sure the child gets homework done, and helping the child with school work at home. The scale also asks parents the degree to which they are prepared to help the child and whether they make a difference in the child’s success at school. In the larger study of which this study is a part, Wong (2005) found that H/L parents reported lower sense of shared responsibility than did African-American or Caucasian parents. Furthermore, among H/L parents, Spanish-speaking parents reported a lower sense of shared responsibility than did English-speaking parents. Language barriers, cultural expectations, and lack of familiarity with American schools may contribute to parents’ low self-efficacy for assisting their children in school. Perhaps teachers perceive children of parents with a low sense of shared responsibility as less likely to receive supports at home that would allow them to succeed if promoted. Thus, they may recommend that these children repeat the grade. It is also possible that parents with a low sense of shared responsibility are less likely to question the school’s recommendations for retention (Chavkin & Williams, 1993).

Bilingual placement

Thomas and Collier (2002) concluded that Spanish-dominant students in Spanish-emphasis programs clearly outperform similar students in English-immersion programs over the course of their schooling. Our results appear to support the initial differences that contribute to this conclusion. Students who are in 80/20 bilingual programs in first grade (and who are overwhelmingly Spanish dominant) have more developed language proficiency and literacy skills than do their predominantly English-dominant peers in non-bilingual classrooms. These findings are consistent with an extensive literature documenting the importance of good entry literacy and vocabulary background to progress in reading and of the importance of using the child’s home language for teaching early reading (August, Carlo, Dressler, & Snow, 2005; Biemiller, 2003; Nagy, McClure, & Montserrat, 1997). Because Spanish speaking parents often believe that the ability to communicate in English is very important to children’s early school success (Piotrkowski, Botsko, & Matthews, 2000), they may refuse to place their children in bilingual preschool or kindergarten classrooms. Schools and early childhood educators need to educate parents as to the primary importance of strong language proficiency in Spanish or English, especially vocabulary knowledge, to early school success.

Limitations and future directions

Because the rate of missingness was much higher for parent data (45%) than for data obtained from other sources, and because it could not be assumed that parent data were missing at random, information about the home environment was analyzed in a separate hierarchical logistic regression that included only those 158 children with parent data. Thus, results of the analyses involving parent data may not generalize to all H/L parents of low achieving students. The fact that parents with and without parent data did not differ on a number of demographic and child literacy variables reduces but does not eliminate this concern.

This study is limited in geographic circumstance and immigration patterns (e.g., Cuban and Puerto Ricans were not represented in our sample). The district policies regarding retention varied from each other, but separate district analyses would produce results based on too small samples for stable estimation or interpretation, so that results reported here must be considered indicative but not necessarily identical across school districts or even schools.

This study does not address the issue of whether or not the retention decision was an appropriate one for children. This issue will be addressed when there are sufficient annual observations for individual growth curve modeling.

Policy implications

These results have several policy implications. Being young for grade is an independent predictor of grade retention, above the effect of low literacy. However, delaying public school entrance for young H/L children is unlikely to improve their academic readiness in the absence of participation in a high quality preschool program (Magnuson & Waldfogel, 2005). H/L children are less likely than are African-American or Caucasian children to enroll in preschool programs, and the programs in which they enroll are less likely to have an academic focus (Magnuson & Waldfogel, 2005). Increasing the availability of affordable, quality preschool programs for H/L children represents an important societal need. Children who begin kindergarten younger than their grade mates might also benefit from participation in intensive literacy training the summer before first grade. Vocabulary-intensive training in the students’ first language is an effective strategy for enhancing early literacy (August et al., 2005). Finally, programs that enhance parents’ sense of efficacy and responsibility for helping their children in school, such as those detailed by Bohan-Baker and Little (2004), are also needed.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grant to Jan Hughes from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (5 R01 HD39367-02).

References

  • Alexander KL, Entwisle DR, Dauber SL. On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
  • Alexander KL, Entwisle DR, Dauber SL. On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
  • Asher SR, Dodge KA. Identifying children who are rejected by their peers. Developmental Psychology. 1986;22:444–449.
  • August D, Carlo M, Dressler C, Snow C. The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 2005;20:50–57.
  • Balczar H, Castro G, Krull J. Cancer risk in Mexican American woman: The role of acculturation, education, and health related risk factors. Health Education Quarterly. 1995;22(1):61–84. [PubMed]
  • Beebe-Frankenberger M, Bocian KM, MacMillan DL, Gresham FM. Sorting second-grade students: Differentiating those retained from those promoted. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004;96:204–215.
  • Biemiller A. Vocabulary: Needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology. 2003;24:323–335.
  • Block JH, Block J. The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In: Collins WA, editor. Minnesota symposia on child psychology. Vol. 13. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1980. pp. 39–101.
  • Bohan-Baker M, Little PMD. The transition to kindergarten: A review of current research and promising practices to involve families. Harvard Family Research Project; 2004. Retrieved December 5, 2005 from gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/fine/resources/research/bohan.html.
  • Bracken BA, McCallum RS. Universal nonverbal intelligence test: Examiner’s Manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Co; 1998.
  • Buhrmester D, Furman W. The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development. 1987;54:1386–1399. [PubMed]
  • Byrnes DA, Yamamoto K. Academic retention of elementary pupils: An inside look. Education. 1985;106:209–214.
  • Caspi A, Block J, Block JH, Klopp B. A “common-language” version of the California Child Q-set for personality assessment. Psychological Assessment. 1992;4:512–523.
  • Chavkin NF, Williams DL. Minority parents and the elementary school: Attitudes and practices. In: Chavkin NF, editor. Families and schools in a pluralistic society. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 1993. pp. 73–83.
  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3. Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
  • Coie JD, Dodge KA, Coppotelli H. Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology. 1982;18:557–570.
  • Cosden M, Zimmer J, Tuss P. The impact of age, sex, and ethnicity on kindergarten entry and retention decisions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1993;15:209–222.
  • Cumberland-Li A, Eisenberg N, Reiser M. Relations of young children’s agreeableness and resiliency to effortful control and impulsivity. Social Development. 2004;13:193–212.
  • Dauber SL, Alexander KL, Entwisle DR. Characteristics of retainees and early precursors of retention in grade: Who is held back? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1993;39:326–343.
  • Diamond KE, Reagan AJ, Bandyk JE. Parents’ conceptions of kindergarten readiness: Relationships with race, ethnicity, and development. Journal of Educational Research. 2000;94:93–100.
  • Eisenberg N, Zhou Q, Losoya S, Fabes RA, Shepard SA, Murphy BC, et al. The relations of parenting, effortful control, and ego control to children’s unregulated expression of emotion. Child Development. 2003;74:875–895. [PubMed]
  • Eisenberg N, Zhou Q, Spinrad TL, Valiente C, Fabes RA, Liew J. Relations among positive parenting, children’s effortful control, and externalizing problems: A three-wave longitudinal study. Child Development. 2005;76:1055–1071. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Garcia Coll C, Crnic K, Lamberty G, Wasik BH, Jenkins R, Garcia HV, et al. An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development. 1996;67:1891–1914. [PubMed]
  • Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2001;40:791–799. [PubMed]
  • Graham S, Juvonen J. Ethnicity, peer harassment, and adjustment in middle school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence. 2002;22:173–199.
  • Grissom J, Shepard L. Repeating and dropping out of school. In: Shepard LA, Smith ML, editors. Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. London: The Falmer Press; 1989. pp. 16–33.
  • Holmes CT. Grade-level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In: Shepard LA, Smith ML, editors. Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. London: The Falmer Press; 1989. pp. 16–33.
  • Hooper VS. Concurrent and predictive validity of the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test and the Leiter International Performance Scale-revised. Dissertation Abstracts International. A. The Humanities and Social Sciences. 2003;63(12-A):4221.
  • Huey SJ, Weisz JR. Ego control, ego resiliency, and the Five-Factor model as predictors of behavioral and emotional problems in clinic-referred children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1997;106:404–415. [PubMed]
  • Hughes J. Assessment of children’s social competence. In: Reynolds CR, Kamphaus R, editors. Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children. New York, NY: Guilford; 1990. pp. 423–444.
  • Hughes JN, Cavell TA, Willson V. Further evidence of the developmental significance of the teacher–student relationship. Journal of School Psychology. 2001;39:289–302.
  • Hughes JN, Gleason K, Zhang D. Relationships as predictors of teachers’ perceptions of academic competence in academically at-risk minority and majority first-grade students. Journal of School Psychology. 2005;43:303–320. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hughes JN, Kwok O. Classroom engagement mediates the effect of teacher–student support on elementary students’ peer acceptance: A prospective analysis. Journal of School Psychology. 2005;43:465–486. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jimerson S, Carlson E, Rotert M, Egeland B, Sroufe LA. Grade retention and school performance: An extended investigation. Journal of School Psychology. 1997;34:325–353.
  • Jimerson SR. Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review. 2001;30:420–437.
  • Johnson DJ, Jaeger E, Randolph SM, Cauce AM, Ward J. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. Studying the effects of early childcare experiences on the development of children of color in the United States: Toward a more inclusive research agenda. Child Development. 2003;74:1227–1244. [PubMed]
  • Kochanska G, Knaack A. Effortful control as a personality characteristic of young children: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Personality. 2003;71:1087–1112. [PubMed]
  • Kochanska G, Murray K, Coy KC. Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood: From toddler to early school age. Child Development. 1997;68:263–277. [PubMed]
  • Kohl GO, Lengua LJ, McMahon RJ. Parent involvement in school: Conceptualizing multiple dimensions and their relations with family and demographic risk factors. Journal of School Psychology. 2000;38(6):501–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Liew J, Hughes J. Unpublished manuscript. J. Liew; 4225 TAMU, College Station. 77843–4225: 2005. Role of effortful control in early academic achievement: A prospective analysis.
  • Ma X. Participation in advanced mathematics: Do expectation and influence of students, peers, teachers, and parents matter? Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2001;26(1):132–146. [PubMed]
  • Magnuson KA, Waldfogel J. Early childhood care and education: Effects on ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children. 2005;15:169–196. [PubMed]
  • Mantzicopoulos P. Flunking kindergarten after head start: An inquiry into the contribution of contextual and individual variables. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2003;95(2):268–278.
  • Masten AS, Morison P, Pellegrini DS. A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology. 1985;21:523–533.
  • McCoy AR, Reynolds AJ. Grade retention and school performance: An extended investigation. Journal of School Psychology. 1999;37:273–298.
  • Meehan BT, Hughes JN, Cavell TA. Teacher–student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child Development. 2003;74:1145–1157. [PubMed]
  • Meisels SJ, Liaw FR. Failure in grade: Do retained students catch up? Journal of Educational Research. 1993;87:69–77.
  • Murray KT, Kochanska G. Effortful control: Factor structure and relation to externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2002;30:503–514. [PubMed]
  • Nagy WE, Mclure EF, Montserrat M. Linguistic transfer and the use of context by Spanish–English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics. 1997;18:431–452.
  • Pagani L, Tremblay RE, Vitaro F, Boulerice B, McDuff P. Effects of grade retention on academic performance and behavioral development. Development and Psychopathology. 2001;13:297–315. [PubMed]
  • Pianta RC, Steinberg MS, Rollins KB. The first two years of school: Teacher–child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology. 1995;7:295–312.
  • Pierson LH, Connell JP. Effect of grade retention on self-system processes, school engagement, and academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1992;84:300–307.
  • Piotrkowski CS, Botsko M, Matthews E. Parents’ and teachers’ beliefs about children’s school readiness in a high-need community. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2000;15(4):537–558.
  • Reed MT, McCallum RS. Construct validity of the universal nonverbal intelligence test (UNIT) Psychology in the Schools. 1995;32(4):277–290.
  • Reynolds AJ. Grade retention and school adjustment: An explanatory analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1992;14:101–121.
  • Riggs NR, Greenberg MT. Moderators in the academic development of migrant Latino children attending after-school programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2004;25:349–367.
  • Schafer JL. NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2. 1999. Software for Windows 95/98/NT, available from http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html.
  • Spira EG, Fischel JE. The impact of preschool inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity on social and academic development: A review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2005;46:755–773. [PubMed]
  • SPSS Inc. SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2004.
  • Stipek D, Byler P. Academic achievement and social behaviors associated with age of entry into kindergarten. Applied Developmental Psychology. 2001;22:175–189.
  • Terry R. Measurement and scaling issues in sociometry: A latent trait approach; Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 1999.
  • Thomas WP, Collier VP. A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long-term Academic Achievement. George Mason University: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence; 2002. Available at http://www.crede.org/research/llaa/1.1_final.html.
  • U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Status and trends in the education of Hispanics. Washington, DC: 2003. (NCES 2003-008)
  • Wong SW. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas A&M University; College Station, TX: 2005. Ethnic differences in parent involvement are moderated by type of involvement.
  • Woodcock RW, Johnson MB. Woodcock–Johnson tests of achievement: Standard and supplemental batteries. Texas: DLM Teaching Resources; 1989.
  • Woodcock RW, McGrew KS, Mather N. WJ-III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing; 2001.
  • Woodcock RW, Munoz AF. Bateria Woodcock–Munoz pruebas de habilidad cognoscitiva-revisada. Chicago: Riverside; 1996.
  • Woodcock RW, Muñoz-Sandoval AF. Woodcock–Muñoz Language Survey Normative Update. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing; 2001. Comprehensive manual.