PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2857395
NIHMSID: NIHMS191133

The Role of Vitamin D in Adults Requiring Nutrition Therapy

Abstract

The major and most well known function of vitamin D is to maintain calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and promote bone mineralization. However, recent evidence suggests that vitamin D may also be important for a variety of non-skeletal outcomes. The review synthesizes the available evidence for the role of vitamin D in skeletal health as well as its novel roles in medical conditions such as muscle function, falls, immunity, glucose homeostasis and cardiovascular diseases. It reviews methods for assessing vitamin D status and it suggests strategies to restore vitamin D status in patients requiring enteral or parenteral nutrition who are at particularly high risk of hypovitaminosis D. Screening for hypovitaminosis D with plasma total 25(OH)D should be a routine part of the care of the patient requiring enteral or parenteral nutrition. Restoration of optimal vitamin D status with high dose supplemental vitamin D is required in most cases, while exposure to sunlight or an ultraviolet B radiation-emitting device is most effective in patients with severe malabsorption or those requiring chronic parenteral therapy. Given the emerging role of vitamin D for a variety of acute and chronic conditions, the optimal vitamin D status in acutely ill patients as well as in patients requiring long-term nutrition therapy warrants further investigation.

Keywords: Vitamin D, nutrition support, nutrition therapy

Introduction

The major and most well known function of vitamin D is to maintain calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and promote bone mineralization. However, recent advances have revealed that vitamin D status may also be important for a variety of non-skeletal outcomes. The purpose of the review was (1) to synthesize the available evidence on the role of vitamin D in medical conditions seen in the inpatient populations including those requiring nutrition therapy, such as muscle function and falls, fractures, compromised immunity, glucose intolerance and cardiovascular disease and (2) to review methods for assessing vitamin D status and (3) to suggest strategies to restore vitamin D status in patients requiring enteral or parenteral nutrition.

Literature Search and Data Synthesis

We searched MEDLINE for English-language literature through December 2008 for: (1) observational studies on the association between vitamin D status and outcomes, (2) intervention studies of the effect of vitamin D supplementation (3) systematic reviews or comprehensive narrative reviews on the role of vitamin D, in inpatient populations with special focus among those requiring nutrition therapy. Search terms included diabetes, hyperglycemia, glucose, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, metabolic bone disease, fracture, falls, immune system, infection, autoimmunity, inpatient, hospital, nutrition therapy, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, vitamin D, and related terms. Additional publications were identified from citations from the recovered articles, review articles and personal reference lists and we selected those with judged relevant.

Review of vitamin D homeostasis

The sources of vitamin D include cutaneous synthesis (in the form of cholecalciferol [D3]) and intake (from diet and/or supplements in the form of D3 or, less frequently, ergocalciferol [D2]). Upon exposure to solar ultraviolet B radiation (UVB), 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin is converted to previtamin D3, which is immediately converted to vitamin D3 in a heat-dependent process. Humans have evolved to derive the majority of their vitamin D requirement from cutaneous synthesis, so vitamin D is found in high amounts in only a few foods (hereafter “D” represents D2 or D3) (Table 1). The most important dietary sources of vitamin D are commonly consumed foods that are fortified with vitamin D, such as milk and breakfast cereals, or supplements containing vitamin D (Table 1). Whether endogenously synthesized or ingested, vitamin D is bound to the vitamin D-binding protein and is transported to the liver where it is converted to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), its major circulating form. This form of vitamin D is biologically inactive. Under the influence of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and vitamin D status, 25(OH)D is converted primarily in the kidney to its active circulating metabolite, 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D (1,25[OH]2D), by the enzyme 25(OH)D-1alpha-hydroxylase (CYP27B1). The primary action of 1,25(OH)2D is through the vitamin D receptor to enhance intestinal calcium absorption and promote the maturation of osteoclasts, thereby maintaining calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and bone health. However, it has been increasingly recognized that vitamin D has pleiotropic effects in a variety of extra-skeletal tissues suggesting an important role in health and prevention of disease as discussed below.

Table 1
Dietary and supplemental sources of vitamin D*

Assessment of vitamin D status

Because of its long half-life, plasma 25(OH)D concentration is considered the best measure for assessing vitamin D status.1, 2 Low 25(OH)D concentration has been correlated with classic conditions of vitamin D deficiency such as hypocalcemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, rickets and osteomalacia, while improvements in circulating 25(OH)D have been correlated with recovery from these conditions.3, 4 The most widely used method to quantify 25(OH)D is by radioimmunoassay. Automated direct detection methods, such as chemiluminescence, HPLC and liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) assays have become increasingly common, especially in large medical centers. The latter two methods quantify and report 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 separately. However, it is not clear whether this separation is useful in clinical practice, as nearly all patients tested will have no detectable circulating 25(OH)D2 unless they have been treated with ergocalciferol (D2). Since there is evidence that separate reporting may confuse interpretation by physicians,5 it is recommended that in routine clinical practice the total 25(OH)D be reported and evaluated.6

Vitamin D binding protein decreases with injury or trauma, and reduced concentrations appear to reflect severity of illness and predict eventual morbidity or mortality.7, 8 However, after an initial decrease early after an acute illness, synthesis of vitamin D binding protein increases.9 Reductions in this protein may in part reflect its role as an actin scavenger, with increased consumption associated with injury. Whether changes in vitamin D binding protein that accompanies acute illness affect measured 25(OH)D concentrations is unclear. Free vitamin D concentration appears to be well maintained in patients with reduced vitamin D binding protein secondary to chronic malabsorption or liver disease, indicating that the total 25(OH)D level is accurate as an indicator of vitamin D status among those with severe illness.2 In general, 1,25(OH)2D should not be measured to assess vitamin D status as those with hypovitaminosis D may have normal 1,25(OH)2D concentration as a result of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Additionally, the elimination half-life of 1,25(OH)2D is very short.

Measurement of 25(OH)D is sometimes accompanied by measurement of serum calcium and PTH concentrations. In healthy populations and in many chronic conditions, PTH elevations reflect secondary hyperparathyroidism in response to hypovitaminosis D. However, provision of parenteral nutrition (PN) may complicate the relationship between measured vitamin D, calcium and PTH. In PN patients receiving nocturnal infusions that contained calcium, the evening diurnal rise in PTH was blunted. When calcium was removed from PN, the normal diurnal rise was no longer suppressed.10

Another factor further complicating interpretation of 25(OH)D among those requiring nutrition therapy may be the accelerated bone resorption seen in immobilized patients. In a study of chronically disabled stroke patients, concentrations of both 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D were low, and there was no correlation between 25(OH)D and PTH. Increases in serum ionized calcium were associated with reduced concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D but were not associated with concentrations of 25(OH)D. Further degree of 25(OH)D deficiency did not predict 1,25(OH)2D concentration.11 Therefore, treatment of 25(OH)D deficiency in those with accelerated bone resorption due to immobilization may not necessarily lead to expected increases in the active 1,25(OH)2D.

In general, biochemical markers that are routinely measured in acutely or chronically ill patients are likely to be of little value in suggesting the presence of hypovitaminosis D. Serum measurements of calcium and phosphorus are influenced by many factors. In hospitalized ill patients, hypoalbuminemia has been a predictor of hypovitaminosis D in some but not all studies.12-15 Hypophosphatemia with initiation of enteral feeding is not uncommon in hospitalized patients, especially in those at risk for refeeding syndrome. Hypovitaminosis D may impair phosphate absorption from food, enteral nutrition products, and from supplements. Hypophosphatemia seen during enteral feeding should stimulate consideration of assessment of vitamin D status.

Vitamin D status in the population

As described below, there is controversy as to the optimal 25(OH)D level; however, most experts agree that a level below 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/L) is considered “deficiency” while a level below 30 ng/ml (75 nmol/L) is considered “insufficiency”.16, 17 Data from NHANES III show that vitamin D insufficiency may affect the majority of the non-institutionalized population in the US, even in the southern latitudes during the winter.18-21 Additional studies have shown a prevalence of hypovitaminosis D ranging from 36-100% in a variety of populations worldwide, from healthy young adults to hospitalized elderly individuals.12, 20, 22-29 As expected, vitamin D deficiency is much more common in high-risk populations, such as homebound elderly and hospitalized persons who are sun-deprived and have suboptimal nutrition,12, 24, 30 overweight/obese individuals, as well as among those with darker skin such as Non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics.19, 31, 32

Risk factors for hypovitaminosis D

There are multiple risk factors for hypovitaminosis D, as outlined in Table 2. Approximately 80% of the variation in vitamin D status among individuals can be explained by differences in cutaneous synthesis as a function of UVB exposure and skin color.33 As 25(OH)D concentration is inversely related to body weight and body fat,34, 35 excess body weight is another important predictor of vitamin D status in the setting of increasing prevalence of obesity. After gastric bypass surgery for obesity, vitamin D status does not necessarily normalize and these patients remain at risk for hypovitaminosis D, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and metabolic bone disease.36, 37 The risk for vitamin D deficiency may be related, in part, to the degree of systemic inflammation.38

Table 2
Major risk factors for vitamin D deficiency

Hospitalized patients, especially those with prolonged hospitalizations or in long-term care facilities, including those who require short-term or long-term enteral or parenteral nutrition, are at particularly high risk for vitamin D deficiency as they exhibit many of the major risk factors, including lack of exposure to UVB light, suboptimal vitamin D intake, advanced age and diseases or medication influencing vitamin D metabolism.

Similar to healthy individuals, lack of sun exposure increases risk for hypovitaminosis D in hospitalized patients,12, 39, 40 as is prolonged hospitalization. Additionally, although dietary intake of vitamin D is less important than UVB exposure in healthy individuals, the association between poor intake of vitamin D and hypovitaminosis D is heightened with inpatients.12, 13, 40 Chronic illness prior to hospitalization may contribute to both poor intake and reduced sun exposure.

Vitamin D absorption is influenced by a number of gastrointestinal diseases. Patients with Crohn’s disease41, 42 and celiac disease41 are at risk for hypovitaminosis D as well as long-term metabolic bone disease. Vitamin D status is also impaired by cholestatic liver disease, such as primary biliary cirrhosis,43 and pancreatic insufficiency with its associated malabsorption (e.g. cystic fibrosis44, 45). Non-cholestatic cirrhosis may also be associated with impaired vitamin D status as loss of hepatocytes may result in reduced synthesis of 25(OH)D. However, not all studies have confirmed reductions in 25(OH)D in these patients,14, 46 probably reflecting less advanced disease with preserved 25-hydroxylase function. Chronic kidney disease is commonly associated with hypovitaminosis D, at least in part due to reduced activity of 25(OH)D-1alpha-hydroxylase. Nephrotic syndrome may lead to increased urinary losses of vitamin D and vitamin D binding protein.

Vitamin D, health outcomes, and implications for hospitalized patients

Emerging data demonstrate that the health implications of impaired vitamin D status are widespread and of potentially great clinical significance, as reviewed below.

The discovery that nearly all tissues in the body express the vitamin D receptor and that several tissues also express the 25(OH)D-1alpha-hydroxylase, which allows for local production of 1,25(OH)2D with a paracrine effect, has provided new insights in the role of vitamin D in several medical conditions. Hypovitaminosis D has been associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality,47 while a recent meta-analysis of randomized trials showed that intake of ordinary doses of vitamin D supplements was associated with a modest decrease in total mortality.48 However, it is important to note that because the risk factors for vitamin D deficiency are also risk factors for many acute and chronic medical conditions, vitamin D status is an excellent marker of overall health; therefore, the observational studies linking hypovitaminosis D with suboptimal health may not reflect a true association because of potential residual or unmeasured confounding.

Musculoskeletal function

Musculoskeletal disability and falls are a common occurrence in the hospital and long-term care facilities.49-51 Several observational studies have reported an association between vitamin D insufficiency and poor lower extremity muscle performance, gait imbalance and increased risk of falls.52-54 Randomized trials have also shown improvements in muscle performance after vitamin D supplementation.55-59 A meta-analysis, which assessed the effectiveness of vitamin D in preventing falls, concluded that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of falls among ambulatory or institutionalized older individuals by more than 20 percent.59 Recent trials have also supported a beneficial role of supplemental vitamin D on falls;60, 61 however, other trials found no effect.62-64 Two of the trials with neutral results were conducted in the outpatient setting where the baseline incidence of falls is low. Vitamin D is thought to improve muscle function by having a direct effect on myocytes, which express vitamin D receptors, to increase the cross-sectional area of type IIA muscle fibers.65

The evidence on the effect of vitamin D on bone health and fractures varies between studies. An evidence-based review combining data from 13 trials found a non-significant reduction in fractures but with significant heterogeneity between studies.66 The effect appears to be maximal when a high dose vitamin D (700-800 international units [17.5–20 μg]/day) is given in older persons living in institutionalized settings.

Vitamin D deficiency is also associated with osteomalacia, which in adults presents with non-specific complaints of malaise, fatigue and body aches and can be debilitating to the patient and frustrating for the clinician to diagnose. Restoring vitamin D status can reverse symptoms of osteomalacia.67

Metabolic Bone Disease

A complicating factor in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) is the occurrence of metabolic bone disease. This has been reported in the majority of patients receiving long-term home PN.68 Several factors have been implicated in the cause of PN-associated metabolic bone disease, including calcium deficiency, aluminum toxicity and amino-acid solutions. The role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of PN-associated metabolic bone disease has been controversial. It has been suggested that, in the absence of a requirement for enteral calcium absorption, the amount of vitamin D found in the multivitamin PN solution may be toxic to the bone. It has been hypothesized that in those patients with suppressed PTH, provision of parenteral vitamin D contributes to metabolic bone disease.68 In two studies, withdrawal of vitamin D from PN was associated with improvement in the clinical and biochemical indices of bone mineralization.69, 70 In these studies, vitamin D status, as assessed by 25(OH)D level, was suboptimal by current criteria. No reports in the last decade have confirmed these findings. In a recent study, bone mineral loss in patients on long-term PN was similar as in age and gender-matched controls,71 suggesting that underlying disease itself may be responsible for metabolic bone disease and PN is less likely to promote metabolic bone disease.

Immune system, infections and autoimmunity

Infections are prevalent in hospitals and long-term facilities. Inpatients are exposed to a large number of pathogens and the risk of acquiring an infection rises when immunity is compromised. Several lines of evidence suggest an important role of vitamin D as a regulator of the immune system.72 In observational studies, vitamin D deficiency has been found to be associated with development of infections, including influenza and tuberculosis.73, 74 Infants with rickets are at increased risk for respiratory infection.75, 76 There is also limited data from randomized trials to suggest that vitamin D supplementation may prevent infections.77, 78 A direct role of vitamin D in immunity is suggested by the expression of the vitamin D receptor by the majority of immune cells, including antigen-presenting cells like macrophages and dendritic cells, as well as activated CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes.79 Moreover, macrophages express 25(OH)D 1-alpha-hydroxylase (CYP27B1), which allows local synthesis of the active form of vitamin D.72, 80 These findings suggest a fundamental role of vitamin D on the innate immune system and a potentially important role in preventing infections among susceptible individuals, including those who required long-term enteral/parenteral nutrition therapy. Finally, there have been several studies reporting an association between hypovitaminosis D and a variety of autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis.81-84 Vitamin D is thought to act as an immunosuppressive agent by suppression of type 1 T-helper cytokine profile, which favors suppressor T cells (type 2 T-helper).85

Glucose Homeostasis and Cardiovascular Disease

Diabetes and cardiovascular disease (hereafter termed ‘cardiometabolic disease’) are major causes of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. On the basis of evidence from animal and human studies, vitamin D has now emerged as a potential modifier of cardiometabolic risk.86 Vitamin D insufficiency has long been suspected to be a risk factor for type 1 diabetes.87 More recently, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that altered vitamin D homeostasis may also play a role in the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Observational studies have reported a consistent association between hypovitaminosis D and incident type 2 diabetes88 or cardiovascular disease.47, 89, 90 Evidence from randomized trials on cardiometabolic disease is limited. A post-hoc analysis of a trial designed for bone-related outcomes showed a beneficial effect of combined vitamin D3 (700 international units [17.5 μg] / day) and calcium (500 mg/day) supplementation on preventing the rise in glycemia that occurs over time among those with glucose intolerance at baseline.91 However, a post-hoc analysis from the large Women’s Health Initiative trial showed no effect of combined vitamin D3 (400 international units [10 μg] /day) and calcium (1000 mg/day) supplementation on incident cardiovascular disease92 or self-reported diabetes.93 In the Women’s Health Initiative, the neutral results can be explained by the low dose of supplemental vitamin D3, which is considered insufficient for both skeletal and non-skeletal outcomes. Congestive heart failure has also been associated with increased risk for hypovitaminosis D.94, 95 Patients with congestive heart failure supplemented with vitamin D show reduced concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, although it remains unclear if this could translate to improved myocardial function or delayed disease progress.96 Several ongoing trials are expected to offer further insights into the role of vitamin D on cardiometabolic disease. The potential effects of vitamin D on the cardiometabolic system are thought to be mediated by a variety of mechanisms, including improving pancreatic beta-cell function, enhancing insulin action in insulin-sensitive tissues, ameliorating systemic inflammation, regulating smooth muscle function and inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system.91

Vitamin D Supplementation

The Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine set the adequate intake (AI) of vitamin D at 200-600 international units (5-15 μg) / day based on age.3 In the Nurses Health Study, a large prospective observational cohort, we found that only 3% of female nurses reported the recommended vitamin D intake for their age. However, there is growing consensus that vitamin D intakes above these levels are associated with better health outcomes. The optimal plasma 25(OH)D concentration is hotly debated but for a variety of skeletal and non-skeletal outcomes, most experts agree that a level above 30 ng/ml (75 nmol/l) is required to improve outcomes.97 To achieve this desired level of 25(OH)D, an intake of at least 1,000 international units [25 μg] /day of vitamin D is needed.97, 98 Levels of 25OHD much higher than 30 ng/ml (75 nmol/l) need to be individualized because risk of nephrolithiasis increases and hypercalcemia may be unmasked in patients with granulomatous disease or asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. Oral formulations of vitamin D are available either as cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2) (Table 1). In general, supplementation with vitamin D3 is preferred over D2 because the latter may be less bioactive and may have lower affinity for the vitamin D receptor,99 although data are conflicting.100 However, which type of vitamin D is preferred may not be very relevant in clinical practice because nearly all over-the-counter dietary supplements and foods fortified with vitamin D contain vitamin D3 while the only high-dose vitamin D available as a prescription formulation, is vitamin D2 (Table 1). Vitamin D2 is the only vitamin D form available as a pharmaceutical preparation because it predated the Food and Drug Administration’ and thus, was grandfathered as a pharmaceutical drug. Vitamin D3 has not been approved as a pharmaceutical agent in the United States.100 Effective supplementation can be achieved either on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.101 The amount of vitamin D in commonly used enteral nutrition formulations (Table 3) is consistent with the official recommendations by the Food and Nutrition Board.3 However, ill patients will likely need much higher intakes of vitamin D because of aging, lack of sun exposure and other factors such as malabsorptive syndromes or renal disease.

Table 3
Vitamin D content in selected total enteral nutrition preparations

Our recommendation is to first confirm hypovitaminosis D (plasma 25[OH]D < 30 ng/ml (75 nmol/l)), and then administer 50,000 international units (1,250 μg) of vitamin D2 weekly for 12 weeks followed by 1,000 international units [25 μg] vitamin D3 daily. Alternatively, as high-dose vitamin D formulations become available, the initial high (“loading”) dose of vitamin D2 may be substituted for an equivalent dose of vitamin D3. This regimen raises 25(OH)D concentration above 30 ng/ml (75 nmol/l) in most patients. However, in patients with severe malabsorption syndromes, doses as high as 50,000 international units (1,250 μg) per day may be needed to adequately raise 25(OH)D levels. Frequent monitoring for hypercalcemia (preferably with measurement of ionized calcium) is recommended, especially when daily high-dose regimens are prescribed. To avoid hypercalciuria, a 24-hour urine collection for measurement of calcium and creatinine may be considered; results of 24-hour urine excretion of calcium in patients maintained by oral or enteral nutrition can be interpreted by use of current normal ranges, but interpretation in patients on PN may be influenced by a number of factors that render interpretation more difficult.

Given the lack of requirement for calcium absorption, patients who are exclusively on PN do not require vitamin D for calcium absorption; however, given the direct effects of vitamin D on parathyroid cells and osteocytes, and its pleiotropic effects on tissues not involved in calcium homeostasis, maintaining optimal vitamin D levels is important in this population as well. The difficulty with patients requiring PN is determining the optimal level of vitamin D. In patients requiring long-term PN, frequent measurements of 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D, parathyroid hormone and calcium and maintenance of these markers as close to normal as possible is important. Vitamin D supplementation in patients who require PN is also challenging because of the lack of a high-dose parenteral formulation of vitamin D. Currently, patients on PN receive a daily multivitamin injection, which contains 200-400 international units (5-10 μg) of vitamin D2 or D3, depending on the product. There is an intramuscular form of high-dose vitamin D (not available in the US) with decreased bioavailability that can cause significant discomfort; therefore it is not recommended. An alternative and quite effective method to improve vitamin D status in individuals with malabsorption syndromes and those on chronic PN, is exposure to sunlight or UVB radiation from a tanning bed or other UVB emitting device.102 On rare occasions, such as with hypercalcemia or hypervitaminosis D, elimination of vitamin D from PN may be desired; however, vitamin D is included as a standard component of parenteral multivitamins and there is no known multivitamin preparation for infusion that does not contain vitamin D.

Conclusions

Vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is very common, especially among hospitalized patients requiring long-term enteral or parenteral nutrition, and it is associated with increased risk for a variety of acute and chronic medical conditions including musculoskeletal disease, fractures, infection and cardiometabolic disease. Screening for vitamin D deficiency with plasma 25(OH)D should be a routine part of the care of the patient requiring enteral or parenteral nutrition therapy. Restoration of optimal vitamin D status with high dose supplemental vitamin D is required in most cases, while exposure to sunlight or UVB-emitting device could be most effective in patients with severe malabsorption or those requiring chronic PN therapy. There are several unresolved questions that need further investigation, including the role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of PN-associated metabolic bone disease, the optimal 25(OH)D level in patients requiring nutrition therapy especially among those exclusively on chronic PN therapy, and the best modality for restoring vitamin D status. Given the emerging roles for vitamin D in inflammation and glucose homeostasis, the influence of vitamin D status and vitamin D provision on outcomes in hospitalized patients deserves further attention.

Acknowledgments

Financial Disclosure: Supported by NIH research grants DK76092, DK78867 and DK79003 (to AGP), the A.S.P.E.N. Rhoads Research Foundation (to ES) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service under Cooperative Agreement No. 58-1950-7-707 (to ES). Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture.

Footnotes

Precis: Hypovitaminosis D is prevalent and it is associated with increased risk for a variety of acute and chronic medical conditions. Assessment of vitamin D status and reversal of vitamin D deficiency has become increasingly important in patient care including patients requiring nutrition therapy.

References

1. Hollis BW. Assessment of vitamin D nutritional and hormonal status: what to measure and how to do it. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996 Jan;58(1):4–5. [PubMed]
2. Zerwekh JE. Blood biomarkers of vitamin D status. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):1087S–1091S. [PubMed]
3. Food and Nutrient Board IoM . Dietary reference intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D and fluoride. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 2003.
4. Holick MF. Vitamin D: A millenium perspective. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(2):296–307. [PubMed]
5. Binkley N, Drezner MK, Hollis BW. Laboratory reporting of 25-hydroxyvitamin D results: potential for clinical misinterpretation. Clin Chem. 2006 Nov;52(11):2124–2125. [PubMed]
6. Hollis BW. Measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a clinical environment: challenges and needs. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):507S–510S. [PubMed]
7. Dahl B, Schiodt FV, Ott P, et al. Plasma concentration of Gc-globulin is associated with organ dysfunction and sepsis after injury. Critical Care Medicine. 2003 Jan;31(1):152–156. [PubMed]
8. Meier U, Gressner O, Lammert F, Gressner AM. Gc-globulin: roles in response to injury. Clinical Chemistry. 2006 Jul;52(7):1247–1253. [PubMed]
9. Dahl B, Schiodt FV, Rudolph S, Ott P, Kiaer T, Heslet L. Trauma stimulates the synthesis of Gc-globulin. Intensive Care Medicine. 2001 Feb;27(2):394–399. [PubMed]
10. Goodman WG, Misra S, Veldhuis JD, et al. Altered diurnal regulation of blood ionized calcium and serum parathyroid hormone concentrations during parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Feb;71(2):560–568. [PubMed]
11. Sato Y, Kuno H, Asoh T, Honda Y, Oizumi K. Effect of immobilization on vitamin D status and bone mass in chronically hospitalized disabled stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1999 May;28(3):265–269. [PubMed]
12. Thomas MK, Lloyd-Jones DM, Thadhani RI, et al. Hypovitaminosis D in medical inpatients. N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 19;338(12):777–783. [PubMed]
13. Hochwald O, Harman-Boehm I, Castel H. Hypovitaminosis D among inpatients in a sunny country. Isr Med Assoc J. 2004 Feb;6(2):82–87. [PubMed]
14. Fisher L, Fisher A. Vitamin D and parathyroid hormone in outpatients with noncholestatic chronic liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Apr;5(4):513–520. [PubMed]
15. Gonzalez EA, Sachdeva A, Oliver DA, Martin KJ. Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in chronic kidney disease. A single center observational study. Am J Nephrol. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):503–510. [PubMed]
16. Vieth R. Critique of the considerations for establishing the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D: critical need for revision upwards. J Nutr. 2006 Apr;136(4):1117–1122. [PubMed]
17. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 19;357(3):266–281. [PubMed]
18. Looker AC, Dawson-Hughes B, Calvo MS, Gunter EW, Sahyoun NR. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of adolescents and adults in two seasonal subpopulations from NHANES III. Bone. 2002 May;30(5):771–777. [PubMed]
19. Yetley EA. Assessing the vitamin D status of the US population. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):558S–564S. [PubMed]
20. Jacobs ET, Alberts DS, Foote JA, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency in southern Arizona. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Mar;87(3):608–613. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Binkley N, Novotny R, Krueger D, et al. Low vitamin D status despite abundant sun exposure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jun;92(6):2130–2135. [PubMed]
22. McKenna MJ. Differences in vitamin D status between countries in young adults and the elderly. Am J Med. 1992 Jul;93(1):69–77. [PubMed]
23. van der Wielen RP, Lowik MR, van den Berg H, et al. Serum vitamin D concentrations among elderly people in Europe. Lancet. 1995 Jul 22;346(8969):207–210. [PubMed]
24. Gloth FM, 3rd, Gundberg CM, Hollis BW, Haddad JG, Jr., Tobin JD. Vitamin D deficiency in homebound elderly persons. JAMA. 1995 Dec 6;274(21):1683–1686. [PubMed]
25. Pittas AG, Dawson-Hughes B, Li T, et al. Vitamin D and calcium intake in relation to type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2006 Mar;29(3):650–656. [PubMed]
26. Hanley DA, Davison KS. Vitamin D insufficiency in North America. J Nutr. 2005 Feb;135(2):332–337. [PubMed]
27. Binkley N, Krueger D, Drezner MK. Low vitamin D status: time to recognize and correct a Wisconsin epidemic. Wmj. 2007 Dec;106(8):466–472. [PubMed]
28. Lips P, Hosking D, Lippuner K, et al. The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy amongst women with osteoporosis: an international epidemiological investigation. J Intern Med. 2006 Sep;260(3):245–254. [PubMed]
29. Bakhtiyarova S, Lesnyak O, Kyznesova N, Blankenstein MA, Lips P. Vitamin D status among patients with hip fracture and elderly control subjects in Yekaterinburg, Russia. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(3):441–446. [PubMed]
30. Foote JA, Giuliano AR, Harris RB. Older adults need guidance to meet nutritional recommendations. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000 Oct;19(5):628–640. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Harris SS. Vitamin D and African Americans. J Nutr. 2006 Apr;136(4):1126–1129. [PubMed]
32. Nesby-O’Dell S, Scanlon KS, Cogswell ME, et al. Hypovitaminosis D prevalence and determinants among African American and white women of reproductive age: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):187–192. [PubMed]
33. Armas LA, Dowell S, Akhter M, et al. Ultraviolet-B radiation increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: the effect of UVB dose and skin color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Oct;57(4):588–593. [PubMed]
34. Looker AC. Body fat and vitamin D status in black versus white women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Feb;90(2):635–640. [PubMed]
35. Snijder MB, van Dam RM, Visser M, et al. Adiposity in relation to vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone levels: a population-based study in older men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):4119–4123. [PubMed]
36. Goode LR, Brolin RE, Chowdhury HA, Shapses SA. Bone and gastric bypass surgery: effects of dietary calcium and vitamin D. Obes Res. 2004 Jan;12(1):40–47. [PubMed]
37. Youssef Y, Richards WO, Sekhar N, et al. Risk of secondary hyperparathyroidism after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in obese women. Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1393–1396. [PubMed]
38. Compher C, Pazianas M, Benedict S, Brown JC, Kinosian BP, Hise M. Systemic inflammatory mediators and bone homeostasis in intestinal failure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007 Mar-Apr;31(2):142–147. [PubMed]
39. Romagnoli E, Caravella P, Scarnecchia L, Martinez P, Minisola S. Hypovitaminosis D in an Italian population of healthy subjects and hospitalized patients. Br J Nutr. 1999 Feb;81(2):133–137. [PubMed]
40. Chatfield SM, Brand C, Ebeling PR, Russell DM. Vitamin D deficiency in general medical inpatients in summer and winter. Intern Med J. 2007 Jun;37(6):377–382. [PubMed]
41. Bikle DD. Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency in gastrointestinal disorders. Journal of Bone & Mineral Research. 2007 Dec;22(Suppl 2):V50–54. [PubMed]
42. Goh J, O’Morain CA. Review article: nutrition and adult inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb;17(3):307–320. [PubMed]
43. Kaplan MM, Elta GH, Furie B, Sadowski JA, Russell RM. Fat-soluble vitamin nutriture in primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1988 Sep;95(3):787–792. [PubMed]
44. Gordon CM, Anderson EJ, Herlyn K, et al. Nutrient status of adults with cystic fibrosis. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Dec;107(12):2114–2119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Rovner AJ, Stallings VA, Schall JI, Leonard MB, Zemel BS. Vitamin D insufficiency in children, adolescents, and young adults with cystic fibrosis despite routine oral supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Dec;86(6):1694–1699. [PubMed]
46. Duarte MP, Farias ML, Coelho HS, et al. Calcium-parathyroid hormone-vitamin D axis and metabolic bone disease in chronic viral liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001 Sep;16(9):1022–1027. [PubMed]
47. Dobnig H, Pilz S, Scharnagl H, et al. Independent association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d levels with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1340–1349. [PubMed]
48. Autier P, Gandini S. Vitamin D supplementation and total mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Sep 10;167(16):1730–1737. [PubMed]
49. von Renteln-Kruse WaK T. Incidence of in-hospital falls in geriatric patients before and after the introduction of an interdisciplinary team-based fall-prevention intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(12):2068–2074. [PubMed]
50. Boufous SaF C. Estimating the incidence of hospitalized injurious falls: impact of varying case definitions. Injury Prevention. 2005;11(6):334–336. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Brophy MZX, Xiang H. Injuries among US adults with disabilities. Epidemiology. 2008;19(3):465–471. [PubMed]
52. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dietrich T, Orav EJ, et al. Higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and inactive persons aged > or =60 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Sep;80(3):752–758. [PubMed]
53. Wicherts IS, van Schoor NM, Boeke AJ, et al. Vitamin D status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jun;92(6):2058–2065. [PubMed]
54. Dharmarajan TS, Akula M, Kuppachi S, Norkus EP. Vitamin D Deficiency in Community Older Adults with Falls of Gait Imbalance: An Under-Recognized Problem in the Inner City. Journal of Nutrition For the Elderly. 2005;25(1):7–19. [PubMed]
55. Bunout D, Barrera G, Leiva L, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation and exercise training on physical performance in Chilean vitamin D deficient elderly subjects. Exp Gerontol. 2006 Aug;41(8):746–752. [PubMed]
56. Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Dick W, et al. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Feb;18(2):343–351. [PubMed]
57. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW, Abrams C, Nachtigall D, Hansen C. Effects of a short-term vitamin D and calcium supplementation on body sway and secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Jun;15(6):1113–1118. [PubMed]
58. Sato Y, Iwamoto J, Kanoko T, Satoh K. Low-dose vitamin D prevents muscular atrophy and reduces falls and hip fractures in women after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(3):187–192. [PubMed]
59. Bischoff-Ferrari H,A, Dawson-Hughes B, Willett W,C. Effect of vitamin D on falls: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291:1999–2006. [PubMed]
60. Broe KE, Chen TC, Weinberg J, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Holick MF, Kiel DP. A higher dose of vitamin d reduces the risk of falls in nursing home residents: a randomized, multiple-dose study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Feb;55(2):234–239. [PubMed]
61. Flicker L, MacInnis RJ, Stein MS, et al. Should older people in residential care receive vitamin D to prevent falls? Results of a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Nov;53(11):1881–1888. [PubMed]
62. Burleigh E, McColl J, Potter J. Does vitamin D stop inpatients falling? A randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2007 Sep;36(5):507–513. [PubMed]
63. Grant AM, Avenell A, Campbell MK, et al. Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D, RECORD): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 May 7-13;365(9471):1621–1628. [PubMed]
64. Porthouse J, Cockayne S, King C, et al. Randomised controlled trial of calcium and supplementation with cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) for prevention of fractures in primary care. BML. 2005 Apr 30;330(7498):1003. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Dawson-Hughes B. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and functional outcomes in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):537S–540S. [PubMed]
66. Cranney A, Weiler HA, O’Donnell S, Puil L. Summary of evidence-based review on vitamin D efficacy and safety in relation to bone health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):513S–519S. [PubMed]
67. Lorenzo JA, Canalis E, Raisz LG. Metabolic Bone Disease. In: Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Polonsky KS, Wilson JD, editors. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. W.B. Saunders Company; Philadelphia: 2008.
68. Buchman AL, Moukarzel A. Metabolic bone disease associated with total parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2000 Aug;19(4):217–231. [PubMed]
69. Shike M, Sturtridge WC, Tam CS, et al. A possible role of vitamin D in the genesis of parenteral-nutrition-induced metabolic bone disease. Ann Intern Med. 1981 Nov;95(5):560–568. [PubMed]
70. Verhage AH, Cheong WK, Allard JP, Jeejeebhoy KN, Harry M, Vars Research Award Increase in lumbar spine bone mineral content in patients on long-term parenteral nutrition without vitamin D supplementation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1995 Nov-Dec;19(6):431–436. [PubMed]
71. Haderslev KV, Tjellesen L, Haderslev PH, Staun M. Assessment of the longitudinal changes in bone mineral density in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 Sep-Oct;28(5):289–294. [PubMed]
72. Adams JS, Liu PT, Chun R, Modlin RL, Hewison M. Vitamin D in Defense of the Human Immune Response. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007;1117:94–105. [PubMed]
73. Cannell JJ, Vieth R, Umhau JC, et al. Epidemic influenza and vitamin D. Epidemiol Infect. 2006 Dec;134(6):1129–1140. [PubMed]
74. Chan TY. Vitamin D deficiency and susceptibility to tuberculosis. Calcif Tussue Int. 2000;66:476–478. [PubMed]
75. Karatekin G, Kaya A, Salihoglu O, Balci H, Nuhoglu A. Association of subclinical vitamin D deficiency in newborns with acute lower respiratory infection and their mothers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Nov 21; [PubMed]
76. Najada AS, Habashneh MS, Khader M. The frequency of nutritional rickets among hospitalized infants and its relation to respiratory diseases. J Trop Pediatr. 2004 Dec;50(6):364–368. [PubMed]
77. Avenell A, Cook JA, MacLennan GS, MacPherson GC. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent infections: a sub-study of a randomised placebo-controlled trial in older people. Age and Ageing. 2007;36(5):574–577. [PubMed]
78. Grant WB, Garland CF. The role of vitamin D3 in preventing infections. Age Ageing. 2008 Jan;37(1):121–122. [PubMed]
79. Veldman CM, Cantorna MT, DeLuca HF. Expression of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) receptor in the immune system. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000;374:334–338. [PubMed]
80. Monkawa T, Yoshida T, Hayashi M, Saruta T. Identification of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1-αhydroxylase gene expression in macrophages. Kidney Int. 2000;(58):559–568. [PubMed]
81. Hypponen E, Laara E, Reunanen A, Jarvelin MR, Virtanen SM. Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9292):1500–1503. [PubMed]
82. Cantorna MT, Mahon BD. Mounting evidence for vitamin D as an environmental factor affecting autoimmune disease prevalence. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004;229:1136–1142. [PubMed]
83. Ponsonby AL, Pezic A, Ellis J, et al. Variation in associations between allelic variants of the vitamin D receptor gene and onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus by ambient winter ultraviolet radiation levels: a meta-regression analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):358–365. [PubMed]
84. Cantorna MT. Vitamin D and its role in immunology: multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006 Sep;92(1):60–64. [PubMed]
85. Lemire JM, Archer DC, Beck L, Spiegelberg HL. Immunosuppressive actions of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3: preferential inhibition of Th1 functions. J Nutr. 1995 Jun;125(6 Suppl):1704S–1708S. [PubMed]
86. Peechakara SV, Pittas AG. Vitamin D as a potential modifier of diabetes risk. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Apr;4(4):182–183. [PubMed]
87. Mathieu C, Badenhoop K. Vitamin D and type 1 diabetes mellitus: state of the art. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Aug;16(6):261–266. [PubMed]
88. Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Dawson-Hughes B. The role of vitamin D and calcium in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jun;92(6):2017–2029. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
89. Giovannucci E, Liu Y, Hollis BW, Rimm EB. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of myocardial infarction in men: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 9;168(11):1174–1180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
90. Wang TJ, Pencina MJ, Booth SL, et al. Vitamin D Deficiency and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2008 Jan 7; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Pittas AG, Harris SS, Stark PC, Dawson-Hughes B. The effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose and markers of inflammation in nondiabetic adults. Diabetes Care. 2007 Apr;30(4):980–986. [PubMed]
92. Hsia J, Heiss G, Ren H, et al. Calcium/vitamin D supplementation and cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2007 Feb 20;115(7):846–854. [PubMed]
93. de Boer IH, Tinker LF, Connelly S, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of incident diabetes in the Women’s Health Initiative. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):701–707. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Pilz S, Marz W, Wellnitz B, et al. Association of vitamin D deficiency with heart failure and sudden cardiac death in a large cross-sectional study of patients referred for coronary angiography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Oct;93(10):3927–3935. [PubMed]
95. Zittermann A, Schleithoff SS, Tenderich G, Berthold HK, Korfer R, Stehle P. Low vitamin D status: a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jan 1;41(1):105–112. [PubMed]
96. Schleithoff SS, Zittermann A, Tenderich G, Berthold HK, Stehle P, Koerfer R. Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;83(4):754–759. [PubMed]
97. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jul;84(1):18–28. [PubMed]
98. Hollis BW. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels indicative of vitamin D sufficiency: implications for establishing a new effective dietary intake recommendation for vitamin D. J Nutr. 2005 Feb;135(2):317–322. [PubMed]
99. Houghton LA, Vieth R. The case against ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) as a vitamin supplement. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Oct;84(4):694–697. [PubMed]
100. Holick MF, Biancuzzo RM, Chen TC, et al. Vitamin D2 is as effective as vitamin D3 in maintaining circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Mar;93(3):677–681. [PubMed]
101. Ish-Shalom S, Segal E, Salganik T, Raz B, Bromberg IL, Vieth R. Comparison of daily, weekly, and monthly vitamin D3 in ethanol dosing protocols for two months in elderly hip fracture patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Sep;93(9):3430–3435. [PubMed]
102. Koutkia P, Lu Z, Chen TC, Holick MF. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency due to Crohn’s disease with tanning bed ultraviolet B radiation. Gastroenterology. 2001 Dec;121(6):1485–1488. [PubMed]