Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français |

**|**HHS Author Manuscripts**|**PMC2856088

Formats

Article sections

- Abstract
- I. Introduction
- II. Manufacturing Uncertainty of H50 and H100
- III. Sensitivity of Zonal Field Gradients
- IV. Stochastic Estimation of Spatial Field Homogeneity
- V. Conclusion
- References

Authors

Related links

IEEE Trans Appl Supercond. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 19.

Published in final edited form as:

IEEE Trans Appl Supercond. 2009 June; 19(3): 2281–2284.

doi: 10.1109/TASC.2009.2018808PMCID: PMC2856088

NIHMSID: NIHMS191410

Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA

Seung-yong Hahn: ude.tim@nhahys; Min Cheol Ahn: ude.tim@luhcnim; Emanuel Saul Bobrov: ude.tim@vorbob; Juan Bascuñán: ude.tim@nanucsab; Yukikazu Iwasa: ude.tim.ukakoj@asawi

This paper addresses adverse effects of dimensional uncertainties of an HTS insert assembled with double-pancake coils on spatial field homogeneity. Each DP coil was wound with Bi2223 tapes having dimensional tolerances larger than one order of magnitude of those accepted for LTS wires used in conventional NMR magnets. The paper presents: 1) dimensional variations measured in two LTS/HTS NMR magnets, 350 MHz (LH350) and 700 MHz (LH700), both built and operated at the Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory; and 2) an analytical technique and its application to elucidate the field impurities measured with the two LTS/HTS magnets. Field impurities computed with the analytical model and those measured with the two LTS/HTS magnets agree quite well, demonstrating that this analytical technique is applicable to design a DP-assembled HTS insert with an improved field homogeneity for a high-field LTS/HTS NMR magnet.

Two Low-/High-Temperature Superconductor (LTS/HTS) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) magnets, 350 MHz (LH350) and 700 MHz (LH700), have been designed, built, and successfully tested at the MIT Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory since 2000 [1], [2]. The LH350 consists of a 300 MHz LTS background magnet (L300) and a 50 MHz HTS insert (H50), while the LH700, an L600 and an H100. Both H50 and H100 are stacks of double-pancake (DP) coils, each wound with high-strength Bi-2223 tape. Each insert was placed in a cold bore of its respective LTS magnet. Each magnet was tested in a bath of liquid helium at 4.2 K with the LTS magnet in persistent mode and the HTS insert in driven mode. The measured spatial field homogeneities of LH350 and LH700 were 633 and 172 ppm, respectively [2], both unexpectedly large compared with a designed target of <10 ppm. We believe that the primary source of this discrepancy between measurement and design in each system is uncertainties in the HTS insert parameters, chiefly dimensions, particularly outer diameter (o.d.) and height of individual DP coils. An important task to ensure the success of a GHz-class high-resolution LTS/HTS NMR magnet having a DP-assembled HTS insert is to: 1) develop an analytical model that quantitatively relates the spatial field homogeneity of an HTS insert to the uncertainties in the insert parameters; and 2) determine tolerances, those for manufacturing the DP coils and those for assembling the insert.

This paper first presents measured dimensional variations of the DP coils in H50 and H100. It then presents an analysis of the sensitivities of four major zonal gradients (Z1, Z2, Z3, and Z4), examining the effects of the geometric variations on each field gradient. Finally, the paper presents a stochastic technique to estimate a potential field impurity of a DP-assembled HTS insert. The field homogeneities computed by this technique for LH350 and LH700 agrees well with those of measurement, demonstrating that the technique is applicable to an HTS insert afflicted with uncertainties in its parameters.

Table I summarizes geometric parameters of two HTS tapes and one LTS wire used respectively for H50, H100, and L300. The “uncertainty” in this paper is defined as U_{x} in (1) where x is a dimensional variable and x_{d} is its deviation.

$${U}_{x}=\frac{{x}_{d}}{x}\times 100\phantom{\rule{0.38889em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.38889em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.38889em}{0ex}}[\%]$$

(1)

The manufacturing tolerances and uncertainties of HTS tapes are ~10 times larger than those of LTS wire. The large tolerances of HTS tapes lead to dimensional uncertainties in DP coils, which in turn led to spatial field impurities of the HTS inserts in the two LTS/HTS NMR magnets.

After each DP coil in H50 and H100 was wound according to the dimensions designed in Table II, its o.d. and height were measured—i.d. of each DP coil is identical to the o.d. of a winding bobbin. The dimensional variations of all DP coils” i.d. and height in H50 and H100 are shown in Fig. 1; Dotted line with solid-square and solid line with solid-circle represent average normalized o.d. and height, respectively. Note that the y-axis in Fig. 1 is “average normalized,” i.e. a solid line in each Figs. 1(a) and 1(b) indicates an average o.d. or height of DP coils in H50 or H100. Table II includes calculated averages and standard deviations from the measured values of o.d. and height; o.d. and height of upper and lower pancake coils were measured individually and averaged to define those of a single DP coil, respectively. As seen in Fig. 1 and Table II, the uncertainty of DP height is generally larger than that of o.d. in both H50 and H100, which corresponds to the 10 times larger tolerance of the HTS tape width than that of the thickness in Table I. As will be seen in Section III, the uncertainty of DP height had more impact on spatial field impurity of H50 and H100 than that of o.d.

Distribution of average normalized o.d. and height of DP coils in H50 and H100. Solid line indicates an average of each parameter.

Because of azimuthal symmetry of ideal DP coils, an axial field, B_{z}, along the magnet axis can be expressed by (2) where all tesseral harmonics disappear and only zonal harmonics remain [3]. In this paper, we deal with zonal field gradients up to the 4th order—*Z*1, *Z*2, *Z*3, and Z4, which corresponds to 2A2, 3A3, 4A4, and 5A5 in the (2), respectively [4].

$${B}_{z}(z)=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty}(n+1){A}_{n+1}{z}^{n}$$

(2)

Sensitivity of the ith order zonal gradient, S_{zi}, is defined as

$${S}_{Zi}=\frac{\partial Zi}{\partial x}\phantom{\rule{0.38889em}{0ex}}i=1,2,3,4$$

(3)

where *Zi* is the ith order zonal gradient and x is a target variable such as o.d. or height of a pancake coil

A sensitivity analysis of field gradients up to the 4th order in H50 and H100 was performed under an operating condition of 350.2312 MHz in LH350 (42 MHz from H50) and 587.5801 MHz in LH700 (96 MHz from H100). Fig. 2 presents analysis results where x-axis indicates the order of stacked pancake coils in H50 or H100; In general, the sensitivity of height uncertainty is larger than that of o.d. Note that the uncertainties of ~20 pancake coils positioned near the insert axial center have dominant impact on field homogeneity; the uncertainty effect of the other DP coils on field homogeneity is negligible. From the maximum sensitivity of each gradient in Fig. 2 multiplied by the standard deviation of o.d. or height in Table II, potential zonal gradients from a single uncertainty of the largest sensitivity o.d. or height can be obtained as seen in Table III where measured gradients are also included. The comparison between measured and calculated (“o.d.” and “height”) in Table III implies that the manufacturing uncertainties of H50 and H100 may have caused the large zonal gradients measured in the LH350 and the LH700.

Sensitivity variation of zonal gradients originated from the uncertainty of o.d. or height of pancake coils in H50 and H100; (a) S_{Z1} and S_{Z2} in H50; (b) S_{Z3} and S_{Z4} in H50; (c) S_{Z1} and S_{Z2} in H100; (d) S_{Z3} and S_{Z4} in H100.

The axial field of an HTS insert is a function of the o.d. and height of individual pancake coils as expressed in (4) where d_{i} and h_{i} are an o.d. and height of the ith pancake coil respectively and N_{pc} is a total number of pancake coils. In the proposed statistic analysis, d_{i} and h_{i} are ranged as seen in (5) where d_{avg} and h_{avg} are the designed o.d. and height, respectively, and Δd_{MAX} and Δh_{MAX} are their estimated maximum tolerance.

$${B}_{z}({d}_{i},{h}_{i})\phantom{\rule{0.38889em}{0ex}}i=1,\cdots ,{N}_{PC}$$

(4)

$$\mid {d}_{i}-{d}_{\mathit{avg}}\mid \phantom{\rule{0.16667em}{0ex}}\le \mathrm{\Delta}{d}_{\mathit{MAX}},\phantom{\rule{0.38889em}{0ex}}\mid {h}_{i}-{h}_{\mathit{avg}}\mid \phantom{\rule{0.16667em}{0ex}}\le \mathrm{\Delta}{h}_{\mathit{MAX}}$$

(5)

Using a random number generator in a FORTRAN code, more than a million cases with all different d_{i} and h_{i} within the range of (5) are examined and an average and standard deviation of zonal gradients and a peak-to-peak field homogeneity within a target DSV (Diameter Spherical Volume) can be obtained.

The proposed stochastic analysis was applied to H50 and HI00. In the analysis, d_{avg} and h_{avg} were set to the measured averages in Table II where Δd_{MAX} and Δh_{MAX} to the maximum deviations of respective o.d. and height between the average and measured values shown in Fig. 1.

Table IV summarizes the results of the stochastic analysis applied to H50 and H100 under the operating condition of 350. 2312 MHz in LH350 (42 MHz from H50) and 587.5801 MHz in LH700 (96 MHz from H100). Note that the standard deviations of zonal gradients in Table IV are generally larger than averages, which reveals the significant impact of the geometric uncertainties of DP coils in the HTS inserts on the field gradients of the LTS/HTS NMR magnets.

Calculated Zonal Gradients and 3-cm-DSV Peak-to-Peak Field Homogeneity From the Proposed Stochastic Analysis

Assuming that the zonal gradients and the overall 3-cm DSV homogeneities from the stochastic analysis follow a Gaussian distribution of an average and standard deviation in Table IV, we may mark, on a standard normal distribution in Fig. 3, the measured gradients in Table II and the overall 3-cm-DSV peak-to-peak homogeneities of 438 ppm in LH350 and 308 ppm in LH700 which were obtained from the measured zonal gradients without tesseral gradients contribution. Most of zonal gradients and 3-cm DSV homogeneities, except the Z1 and Z3 in H50, are located within the range of one standard deviation in Fig. 3. This implies that the proposed method with a designed parameter as an average and an estimated manufacturing uncertainty as a standard deviation may be used to statistically estimate a potential field impurity of a DP-assembled HTS insert even before it is constructed.

Effects of manufacturing uncertainties, chiefly of dimensional, on spatial field homogeneity in a double-pancake (DP) type HTS insert were investigated. According to the analyses in this paper, we may conclude that:

- Dimensional tolerances of Bi-2223 HTS tape, if much greater than those acceptable to LTS wires, lead to uncertainties in geometric parameters of DP coils. When such DP coils are assembled into an HTS insert for a high-field LTS/HTS NMR magnet, these tolerances become a source of “large” field impurities.
- Height uncertainties of DP coils have more adverse effects on zonal field gradients than those of o.d..
- According to a sensitivity analysis, these uncertainties are likely sources of the measured field impurities in H50 and H100, particularly of the unexpectedly large zonal gradients.
- These uncertainties in the pancake coils, about 20 of them, positioned near the centers of H50 and H100 have dominant impacts on field homogeneity; those in the rest have negligible effects.
- Spatial field impurity originating from manufacturing uncertainties of a DP-assembled HTS magnet can be estimated by the statistical analysis described in this paper.
- Validity of the stochastic method presented here was verified by good agreement between the field homogeneities estimated by this method and those measured in LH350 and LH700.
- The analytical technique described here can be used to design an improved field homogeneity DP-assembled HTS insert for a high-field LTS/HTS NMR magnet by focusing on not an ideally designed field homogeneity but a stochastically predicted one.

This work was supported by the NIH National Center for Research Resources.

The authors thank the late Emanuel Saul Bobrov (1937–2008), our colleague and a long time member of the Magnet Technology Division, for his outstanding and distinguished contributions to many areas of magnet technology, including the subject matter of this paper.

1. Lee H, Bascuñán J, Iwasa Y. A high-temperature superconducting double-pancake insert for an NMR magnet. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond. 2003 June;13(2):1546–1549.

2. Bascuñán J, Kim W, Hahn S, Bobrov ES, Lee H, Iwasa Y. An LTS/HTS NMR magnet operated in the range 600–700 MHz. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond. 2007 June;17(2):1446–1449.

3. Garret MW. Thick cylindrical coil systems for strong magnetic fields or gradient homogeneities of the 6th to 20th Order. Journal of Applied Physics. 1967 May;38:2563–2585.

4. Hahn S, Bascuñán J, Kim W, Bobrov ES, Lee H, Iwasa Y. Field mapping, NMR lineshape, and screening currents induced field analyses for homogeneity improvement in LTS/HTS NMR magnets. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond. 2008 June;18(2):856–859.

PubMed Central Canada is a service of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) working in partnership with the National Research Council's national science library in cooperation with the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the U.S. National Library of Medicine(NCBI/NLM). It includes content provided to the PubMed Central International archive by participating publishers. |