PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
 
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 May; 29(5): 503–507.
Published online 2010 February 26. doi:  10.1007/s10096-010-0886-2
PMCID: PMC2854363

In vitro activity of tigecycline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, including livestock-associated strains

Abstract

The in vitro activity of tigecycline was determined using a well-defined collection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates (n = 202), including 33 livestock-associated strains. Susceptibility testing was performed using the Etest system. Among the 202 MRSA strains, three (1.5%) had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value for tigecycline greater than 0.5 mg/l, which are considered to be resistant. When these strains were tested using Iso-Sensitest medium, the MICs were substantially lower and no resistance was found. This discrepancy warrants further investigations into the preferred test conditions for tigecycline. In conclusion, tigecycline showed good activity against MRSA strains in vitro.

Introduction

Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have traditionally been a problem in health-care settings [1]. According to a report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, approximately 60% of all S. aureus isolated from patients in intensive care units in US hospitals were methicillin-resistant in 2003 [2]. For the last approximately 10 years, MRSA has expanded its territory to the community, causing severe infections in previously healthy persons all over the world [3, 4]. In 2003, a new clone of MRSA was observed in The Netherlands that is related to an extensive reservoir in pigs and cattle [5]. The livestock-associated clone is characterized by being non-typable by SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). By the end of 2007, nearly 30% of all MRSA observed in The Netherlands were of this type [6]. There are important differences between livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA), healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), and community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) regarding the susceptibility against antimicrobial agents. HA-MRSA isolates are frequently multidrug-resistant, while CA-MRSA and LA-MRSA are relatively susceptible for most non-beta-lactam antibiotics, with the exception of tetracycline for LA-MRSA, for which they are almost always resistant. This is most likely due to the extensive use of this antimicrobial agent in animal husbandry. Because tigecycline is related to tetracycline, it is important to determine the activity of this new drug for LA-MRSA.

The treatment of serious MRSA infections has been based, for many years, upon the use of glycopeptides, i.e., vancomycin and teicoplanin. However, concerns over increasing rates of heteroresistance and tolerance to glycopeptides [7] has urged the development of newer agents. Tigecycline is the first commercially available member of the glycylcyclines, a new class of antimicrobial agents. The glycylcyclines are derivatives of the tetracycline antibiotics, with structural modifications that result in activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic micro-organisms, including multidrug-resistant strains. It exhibits generally bacteriostatic action by reversibly binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit and inhibiting protein translation [8].

The purpose of the present study was to assess the in vitro activity of tigecycline against MRSA isolates collected in The Netherlands using a well-defined collection of strains that included a representative sample of LA-MRSA strains.

Materials and methods

A total of 202 MRSA isolates were tested in this study. All MRSA isolates are part of the MRSA strain collection of the National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. The collection consisted of three subsets. The first set of isolates used in this study contained 76 MRSA isolates that were collected between 1990 and 1998 in The Netherlands (old MRSA). The second set was 93 MRSA isolates collected between 2003 and 2005 (recent MRSA). These MRSA strains all had a unique PFGE typing result. The third set of isolates tested consisted of 33 LA-MRSA strains and were collected between 2003 and 2005. They had been collected in a previous study and the strains in our evaluation are the index cases of the previous survey [9]. All 202 isolates have been confirmed as S. aureus and methicillin-resistant using a duplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the mecA gene and coagulase gene as described previously [10, 11].

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for tigecycline was determined by using the Etest system (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) with a concentration range of 0.016 to 256 μg/ml. Etest strips contained a concentration gradient of the antimicrobial agent with a standard amount of calcium throughout the strip. Etest strips were applied to the surface of 150--mm Mueller–Hinton agar plates. Plates were incubated at 35°C in ambient air for 24 h prior to reading the MIC results. In addition, the MICs of the following antimicrobial agents were determined simultaneously: oxacillin, gentamicin, cotrimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, rifampin, daptomycin, tetracycline, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. All MICs were determined using the Etest system. For vancomycin and teicoplanin, the Etest strips were placed on brain heart infusion agar, using a high inoculum (2.0 McFarland) and an extended incubation time (48 h) to be able to detect hGISA isolates. Isolates were categorized as susceptible or resistant to an antimicrobial agent according to the breakpoints published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [12]. The proposed breakpoint for tigecycline is greater than 0.5 mg/l for S. aureus (both methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains). The 11 MRSA strains with the highest MIC for tigecycline on Mueller–Hinton agar plates were subsequently applied on 90-mm Iso-Sensitest agar plates (Oxoid Ltd.). The plates were then incubated at 35°C in ambient air for 24 h prior to reading the MIC results.

All results were entered into a database and further statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. The MIC values for all tested antimicrobial agents of the different subsets of strains were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test.

Results and discussion

The observed MIC range for tigecycline was 0.05 to 1.0 μg/ml, with MIC values at which 50 and 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited (MIC50 and MIC90) of 0.19 and 0.38 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 of LA-MRSA, old MRSA, and recent MRSA isolates for tigecycline and other antibiotics are outlined in Table 1. No significant difference was found in the portion of tigecycline resistance between recent MRSA and old MRSA. None of the LA-MRSA isolates were resistant for tigecycline. Three (2%) of the 169 tested MRSA isolates were resistant for tigecycline. Of the 76 old MRSA isolates, two (3%) isolates had MICs for tigecycline greater than 0.5 μg/ml and are, therefore, considered to be resistant for tigecycline. In addition, one isolate (1%) of the 93 recent MRSA strains had an MIC value for tigecycline greater than 0.5 μg/ml. The 11 MRSA strains with the highest MIC for tigecycline on Mueller–Hinton agar plates were retested using Etest strips that were applied on Iso-Sensitest agar plates (Oxoid Ltd.) and simultaneously on Mueller–Hinton agar plates. The MIC values for tigecycline of the 11 MRSA strains applied on Mueller–Hinton agar plates were comparable with the previously obtained MIC values. On Iso-Sensitest medium, these 11 MRSA strains had significantly 2-fold lower MIC values for tigecycline using linear regression analysis (p < 0.001). Figure 1 shows the shift towards lower MIC values for tigecycline when MRSA strains were applied on Iso-Sensitest medium. The MICs for tigecycline showed a significant correlation with those of tetracycline (r = 0.518; p < 0.001) and teicoplanin (r = 0.325; p < 0.001).

Table 1
MIC50 and MIC90 values of antimicrobial agents against 76 MRSA collected between 1990 and 1998 (old MRSA), 93 MRSA collected between 2003 and 2005 (recent MRSA), and 33 livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) strains collected in The Netherlands between 2003 ...
Fig. 1
Linear regression analysis of MIC values for tigecycline using Mueller–Hinton medium and Iso-Sensitest medium

LA-MRSA was the most susceptible group of strains. They were only significantly more often resistant to tetracycline (Table 1). Old MRSA strains were more often resistant to most groups of antimicrobial agents, compared to recent MRSA. The only agent that was significantly (p < 0.001) more resistant in recent strains in comparison with old strains was vancomycin.

In a well-defined collection of MRSA, we found that a minority (1.5%) was resistant for tigecycline. All strains were isolated before tigecycline had been used in patients. The results of this study slightly differed from other data on European and North American antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates that were phenotypically characterized [1315]. In a recent study, the in vitro activity of tigecycline against 38 MRSA and the correlation of this activity with their resistance gene content were determined [16]. Tigecycline demonstrated good activity against MRSA, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.12 and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively. Overall, tigecycline showed an MIC range of 0.06 to 0.25 μg/ml. The tigecycline MICs determined in our study were slightly higher.

In another study, Fluit et al. [17] found the MIC range for tigecycline to be 0.06 to 2.0 μg/ml. For the 106 S. aureus isolates tested, two (2%) isolates had MIC values for tigecycline greater than 0.5 μg/ml and are, therefore, considered to be resistant. These findings are identical to our results. In our study, the MICs for tigecycline showed a significant correlation with the MICs for tetracycline. Fluit et al. found no relation between the presence of tetracycline resistance determinants tet(K) or tet(M) and the MICs for tigecycline observed for S. aureus, although tetracycline-susceptible isolates were more often susceptible to tigecycline.

The possible correlation of the in vitro susceptibility of tigecycline and tetracycline prompted us to include LA-MRSA in the evaluation. These strains are known to have high levels of tetracycline resistance. Also, the current evaluation showed that 28 out of the 33 (85%) LA-MRSA strains were resistant against tetracycline. However, none of the LA-MRSA isolates tested was resistant against tigecycline. Conversely, we found tigecycline resistance in three of the HA-MRSA strains when incubated on Mueller–Hinton agar plates. Because of the recently reported influence of the test conditions on the in vitro susceptibility of tigecycline, we also tested a subset of the strains on Iso-Sensitest medium [18]. Eleven MRSA strains with the highest MICs for tigecycline were selected and retested on Mueller–Hinton agar and on Iso-Sensitest medium. On Mueller–Hinton agar, the results were identical to the initial result, but on Iso-Sensitest medium, the MICs for tigecycline were much lower, and all strains were considered to be susceptible. The results for tigecycline are influenced by the concentration of manganese in the medium [18]. As Mueller–Hinton agar is a biological medium, the concentration of manganese may vary. Iso-Sensitest is a biochemical medium, which is well-defined. However, the CLSI standard recommends the use of Mueller–Hinton medium for the susceptibility testing of tigecycline using the Etest system [19]. This discrepancy requires further investigations into the underlying mechanisms.

An interesting aspect of this study is the remarkable difference in resistance against various classes of antibiotics between old and more recent strains of MRSA. The older strains were, in general, much more resistant than the more recent strains (Table 1). This may reflect the emergence of CA-MRSA in recent years, which are, in general, more susceptible [4]. The only antimicrobial agent with significantly higher MICs in recent MRSA was vancomycin. This has recently been reported by other groups and may reflect the increased use of this agent in hospitals all over the world [20, 21]. As vancomycin is considered to be the cornerstone of therapy for serious MRSA infections, the increasing MICs are a worrying finding. It stresses the need for alternative therapeutic agents. The LA-MRSA strains were also relatively susceptible to many classes of antibiotics, with the exception of tetracycline. MICs for tigecycline were comparable in all three groups of strains.

In conclusion, tigecycline exhibited broad in vitro activity against a collection of MRSA strains collected in The Netherlands, including livestock-associated strains. Using the recommended methodology, we found three strains to be resistant. However, these strains were considered to be susceptible when Iso-Sensitest medium was used. This discrepancy warrants further investigations into the preferred test conditions because the interpretation of the in vitro susceptibility of tigecycline is affected significantly.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

1. Tiemersma EW, Bronzwaer SL, Lyytikäinen O, Degener JE, Schrijnemakers P, Bruinsma N, Monen J, Witte W, Grundman H, European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System Participants Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe, 1999–2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1627–1634. [PubMed]
2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470–485. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.10.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Diederen BM, Kluytmans JA. The emergence of infections with community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect. 2006;3:157–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.09.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Kluytmans-Vandenbergh MF, Kluytmans JA. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current perspectives. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(Suppl 1):9–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01341.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J, Klaassen C, Wulf M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1965–1966. [PubMed]
6. Huijsdens XW, Bosch T, van Santen-Heuvel MG, Spalburg E, Heck M, Pluister GN, van Luit M, Haenen A, de Neeling AJ (2009) The clonal structure of PFGE non-typeable methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Helsinki, Finland, May 2009, 15(S114), abstract no. 533
7. Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, Boulton ML, Tenover FC, Downes FP, Shah S, Rudrik JT, Pupp GR, Brown WJ, Cardo D, Fridkin SK, Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Investigative Team Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Engl J Med. 2003;14:1342–1347. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025025. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Rose WE, Rybak MJ. Tigecycline: first of a new class of antimicrobial agents. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:1099–1110. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.8.1099. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Loo I, Huijsdens X, Tiemersma E, Neeling A, Sande-Bruinsma N, Beaujean D, Voss A, Kluytmans J. Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of animal origin in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1834–1839. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Kluytmans JA, Griethuysen A, Willemse P, Keulen P. Performance of CHROMagar selective medium and oxacillin resistance screening agar base for identifying Staphylococcus aureus and detecting methicillin resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2480–2482. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2480-2482.2002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Griethuysen AJ, Pouw M, Leeuwen N, Heck M, Willemse P, Buiting A, Kluytmans J. Rapid slide latex agglutination test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2789–2792. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Approved standard M100-S16. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2006.
13. Huang YT, Liao CH, Teng LJ, Hsueh PR. Comparative bactericidal activities of daptomycin, glycopeptides, linezolid and tigecycline against blood isolates of Gram-positive bacteria in Taiwan. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:124–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01870.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Mendes RE, Sader HS, Deshpande L, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from North American medical centers. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;60:433–436. [PubMed]
15. Zhanel GG, DeCorby M, Laing N, Weshnoweski B, Vashisht R, Tailor F, Nichol KA, Wierzbowski A, Baudry PJ, Karlowsky JA, Lagacé-Wiens P, Walkty A, McCracken M, Mulvey MR, Johnson J, Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance (CARA) Hoban DJ. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in intensive care units in Canada: results of the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) Study, 2005–2006. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1430–1437. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01538-07. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Borbone S, Lupo A, Mezzatesta ML, Campanile F, Santagati M, Stefani S. Evaluation of the in vitro activity of tigecycline against multiresistant Gram-positive cocci containing tetracycline resistance determinants. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31:209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.03.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Fluit AC, Florijn A, Verhoef J, Milatovic D. Presence of tetracycline resistance determinants and susceptibility to tigecycline and minocycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;4:1636–1638. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.4.1636-1638.2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Fernández-Mazarrasa C, Mazarrasa O, Calvo J, Arco A, Martínez-Martínez L. High concentrations of manganese in Mueller–Hinton agar increase MICs of tigecycline determined by Etest. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:827–829. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02464-08. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th edn. Approved standard M7-A5. 5. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2000.
20. Steinkraus G, White R, Friedrich L. Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:788–794. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm258. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Wang G, Hindler JF, Ward KW, Bruckner DA. Increased vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from a university hospital during a 5-year period. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3883–3886. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01388-06. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer