|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are invariably upregulated in the stromal compartment of epithelial cancers and appear to promote invasion and metastasis. Here we report that phenotypically normal mammary epithelial cells with tetracycline-regulated expression of MMP3/stromelysin-1 (Str1) form epithelial glandular structures in vivo without Str1 but form invasive mesenchymal-like tumors with Str1. Once initiated, the tumors become independent of continued Str1 expression. Str1 also promotes spontaneous premalignant changes and malignant conversion in mammary glands of transgenic mice. These changes are blocked by coexpression of a TIMP1 transgene. The premalignant and malignant lesions have stereotyped genomic changes unlike those seen in other murine mammary cancer models. These data indicate that Str1 influences tumor initiation and alters neoplastic risk.
Extracellular matrix (ECM)-degrading matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are universal features of carcinoma progression and are associated with tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. MMPs not only foster invasion and spread by disrupting ECM barriers but also affect cellular signaling by several routes (Werb, 1997; Lukashev and Werb, 1998). Interestingly, most MMPs are synthesized not by the genetically altered cancer cells but by adjacent and intervening stromal cells (Coussens and Werb, 1996). There is also a growing awareness that stromal cells and the matrix microenvironment can influence initial tumor development (Jacoby et al., 1997; Howe et al., 1998; Hsieh et al., 1998; Jacobs et al., 1999). Thus, given their stromal origin, consistent upregulation, and signaling capacity, stromal MMPs may also contribute to the initial stages of cancer development.
MMP3/stromelysin-1 (Str1) is a candidate for a stromal MMP that can exert oncogenic effects. It can degrade numerous ECM substrates, including collagens III, IV, V, IX, X, and XI, laminins, elastin, entactin, fibronectin, fibrin, fibrillins, fibulin, link protein, osteonectin, tenascin, vitronectin, and ECM proteoglycans (reviewed in Sternlicht and Werb, 1999). Str1 can also release cell surface molecules, including E-cadherin, L-selectin, heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor, and TNF-α; it can activate other MMPs, including gelatinase B and the collagenases; and it can inactivate several serine proteinase inhibitors (reviewed in Sternlicht and Werb, 1999). Importantly, Str1 was originally cloned (Matrisian et al., 1985) and repeatedly recloned as a tumor-specific gene (Muller et al., 1988; Ostrowski et al., 1988).
Str1 is expressed in stromal cells throughout mammary development and is maximally expressed during involution when ECM remodeling and alveolar regression take place (Talhouk et al., 1992; Witty et al., 1995; Lund et al., 1996). Although stromal cells synthesize Str1 in vivo, the protein associates with the epithelium (Talhouk et al., 1992; Lund et al., 1996). There are two distinct responses to Str1 in mammary epithelium: proliferation and branching in ductal cells, and apoptosis in differentiated secretory alveolar cells (Sympson et al., 1994; Boudreau et al., 1995; Witty et al., 1995). There are also parallels between development and neoplasia. Expression of Str1 in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice during development induces upregulation of endogenous Str1 and other MMPs in surrounding stromal fibroblasts and leads to fibrosis, neovascularization, and tenascin-C expression, all of which are hallmarks of the reactive stroma of involution (Alexander et al., 1996; Thomasset et al., 1998). Increased cell proliferation, an altered stroma, angiogenesis, and tenascin-C expression are also features of cancer progression (Borsi et al., 1992; Rønnov-Jessen et al., 1996).
Here, we have examined how Str1 affects tumor progression using two genetic approaches: phenotypically normal mammary epithelial cells that express Str1 in a tetracycline-regulated manner, and an Str1 transgene targeted to mouse mammary glands by the mouse whey acidic protein (WAP) gene promoter. Our results indicate that not only can Str1 induce an altered stromal environment, but as a product of such an environment, it can promote the phenotypic conversion and malignant transformation of mammary epithelial cells.
Str1 has both ECM and cell surface targets (Sternlicht and Werb, 1999). Thus, its biologic effects could arise from its alteration of surrounding ECM or by its direct action on the epithelial cells themselves. Therefore, we treated an immortal but functionally normal mouse mammary epithelial cell line (Scp2), which responds to ECM signals but does not assemble its own ECM, with recombinant Str1 (rStr1). Scp2 cells grow as an epithelial sheet with E-cadherin-rich adherens junctions and are cytokeratin positive and vimentin negative. The rStr1 rapidly induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions (EMT), characterized by loss of cell–cell interactions, acquisition of a scattered morphology, downregulation of epithelial cytokeratins, and upregulation of the mesenchymal marker vimentin (Figure 1). These changes did not occur when the synthetic MMP inhibitor GM6001 was also added (data not shown). This treatment of the cells in trans mimics the in vivo production of Str1 by fibroblasts acting on mammary epithelium.
To examine the effect of Str1 on Scp2 cells in vivo, we used Scp2 cells stably transfected with an autoactivating rat Str1 cDNA under the control of a tetracycline (Tet)-repressible promoter (Lochter et al., 1997). These transfected cells grow as epithelial sheets when grown in medium containing Tet, whereas induction of Str1 expression by Tet withdrawal results in EMT, cleavage and loss of E-cadherin, and acquisition of the ability to form anchorage-independent colonies in agar and invade Matrigel (Lochter et al., 1997). For the present study, we used two clones with regulated Str1 expression (p2S7 and p2S10), a nonexpressing clone (p2S3), and parental Scp2 cells. When Scp2 cells and Str1-transfected cells grown in the presence of Tet were injected into surgically cleared (gland-free) mammary fat pads of scid/scid mice, they grew and formed relatively normal duct-like and pseudoglandular structures if the mice were given Tet in their drinking water (Figures 2Aa and 2Ab). These structures had cytokeratin-8-positive, vimentin-negative luminal cells but lacked smooth muscle actin-positive myoepithelial cells that normally surround luminal epithelium (Figures 2Ac and 2Ad). The ductal structures did not branch, which is consistent with the lack of myoepithelial cells that produce epimorphin, a morphogen required for branching (Hirai et al., 1998). This growth pattern persisted for at least 13 weeks. However, when Str1 expression was induced in vivo by withholding Tet from the drinking water, the p2S10 cells formed small tumors in 5 of 18 injected sites by 6 weeks (Figure 2B). The tumors were composed largely of vimentin-positive and cytokeratin-negative spindle-shaped (mesenchymal-like) cells and were invasive at their periphery (Figure 2A). Thus, induction of Str1 expression triggered EMT and rendered the cells tumorigenic and invasive in vivo.
When Tet was withheld from the drinking water for 12 days after injecting uninduced p2S10 cells and then replaced for the remaining 4.3 weeks, tumor formation was still seen, albeit at a lower rate than when Tet was continuously absent (Figure 2B). This suggests that once tumorigenicity is achieved, it would not be blocked by repressing Str1 expression. To test this, we induced Str1 expression in culture for 2 months in p2S10 and p2S7 cells. When the preinduced cells were injected into cleared fat pads, large tumors grew at all injected sites regardless of the presence or absence of Tet in the drinking water (Figure 2B). The tumors were highly invasive and composed almost entirely of vimentin-positive spindle-shaped cells with fewer than 1% cytokeratin-positive cells (Figure 2Ae–h). Interestingly, several tumors had small areas of differentiation to a cartilage-like phenotype (Figure 2Ae–h). Such changes, called chondroid metaplasia, are also seen in human tumors with EMT and were first described three centuries ago (cited in Wargotz and Norris, 1989). Thus, once EMT is induced, converted cells no longer require Str1 transgene stimulation to elicit an altered program of gene expression and tumorigenesis.
The preinduced p2S10 cells also acquired the ability to form subcutaneous tumors with or without Tet in the drinking water (data not shown). These tumors were about one-tenth the size of the orthotopic tumors but had the same infiltrative spindle-cell morphology. No other cells grew subcutaneously. Taken together, these data indicate that Str1 can trigger tumor progression in an immortal but functional mammary epithelial cell line.
To examine the long-term effect of Str1 on normal mammary epithelial cells, we used WAP-Str1 transgenic mice. We had previously observed precocious lobuloalveolar development in 3- to 10-week-old WAP-Str1 transgenic mice (Sympson et al., 1994) and an altered reactive stroma in 2- to 4-month-old mice (Thomasset et al., 1998). Here we found that 6- to 24-month-old transgenic mice exhibited mammary abnormalities, pre-malignant lesions, and malignancies (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Of 163 mice from five independent transgenic lines (median age 18 months), 77% had moderate or severe fibrosis (collagen and fibroblast accumulation with loss), 64% had moderate or severe hyperplasia (epithelial cell accumulation), 53% had lymphocytic infiltrates, 20% had dysplasias (atypical proliferative lesions) or ductal carcinoma in situ, and 7.4% developed mammary carcinomas.
The incidence of the various lesions was 1.2- to 1.9-fold higher in parous mice than in virgin mice, and hyper-plastic and fibrotic changes were generally more severe in parous animals. Whereas increases in incidence and severity would be expected given the pregnancy-driven nature of the WAP promoter, their modesty may reflect the fact that the promoter is minimally active during each estrus cycle, so that parity only slightly increases lifetime Str1 exposure. Indeed, even low transgene expression during puberty causes increased ductal branching and precocious lobuloalveolar development (Sympson et al., 1994), thus increasing the number of potential target cells that are “at risk” over an extended period of time. Average tumor latency was 18.7 months, with the first tumor appearing in a 6-month-old parous mouse. The hyperplastic and fibrotic lesions tended to be more severe in older animals, and the incidence of hyperplasia increased from 46% at 6 months to 78% at 2 years of age. These data are consistent with a model of multistage neoplastic progression induced by Str1 expression.
Mammary carcinomas were seen in mice from three different founders (fewer than ten mice were studied in the other two lines). Nine of the tumors were moderately well-differentiated adenocarcinomas (Figure 5a–c), and three were undifferentiated tumors with evidence of EMT. Two of these were carcinosarcomas with cytokeratin-positive and vimentin-negative epithelial-like populations and distinct vimentin-positive and cytokeratin-negative fibroblast-like populations (Figure 5g–i). The third undifferentiated tumor gave rise to lung and kidney metastases and expressed both cytokeratins and vimentin (Figure 5d–f). A cell line derived from the primary mammary tumor also coexpressed cytokeratin and vimentin and formed invasive tumors that were cytokeratin and vimentin positive in vivo (data not shown).
In contrast to the Str1-expressing transgenic mice, nontransgenic littermate controls (median age 18 months) exhibited a low incidence of mild hyperplasia, fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltration (Figure 3). These low incidence rates were similar for virgin and parous controls. We also isolated two sublines of Str1 transgenic mice in which expression of the transgene was silenced and could not be detected by RT-PCR, presumably due to transgene methylation as determined by altered sensitivity to restriction endonucleases. The nonexpressing transgenic mice (median age 13 months) also showed a low incidence of mild lesions (Figure 3). These data indicate that expression of the Str1 transgene is required to promote neoplastic progression.
If the induction of neoplasia by Str1 is due to its proteolytic activity, then overexpression of its endogenous inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP1), should quench this phenotype. Thus, we mated WAP-Str1 mice with mice carrying a human TIMP1 transgene under the control of the same WAP promoter to examine the effect of TIMP1 on the development of mammary lesions in WAP-Str1 mice. Mammary hyperplasias were examined as a surrogate endpoint in 10- to 16-month-old female offspring (Figure 6). Only 3 of 16 mice (19%) carrying both Str1 and TIMP1 transgenes had mild mammary hyperplasias, whereas 8 of 11 mice (73%) carrying the Str1 transgene alone had moderate to severe hyperplasias. A similar frequency (66%) was seen in the cohort of 100 WAP-Str1 females from the same transgenic founder (M2-5). Mice carrying only the TIMP1 transgene had a slightly altered involution phenotype but were otherwise normal. Nontransgenic littermates had entirely normal mammary glands. These data indicate that active Str1 is required for mammary lesions to develop.
Because Str1 acts extracellularly, we wanted to determine if tumorigenicity was accompanied by genomic reorganization. Analysis of ten mammary lesions from three Str1 transgenic lines by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) revealed DNA losses in specific regions of mouse chromosomes 4 and 7 in both premalignant and malignant lesions (Figure 7A). In addition, the three tumors with EMT and a severe hyperplasia had DNA copy number gains on chromosomes 6 and 15. Because these gains were associated with EMT, we separately analyzed the epithelial- and mesenchymal-like populations of one carcinosarcoma after laser microdissection. The chromosome 15 amplification was only seen in microdissected fibroblast-like areas that had undergone EMT, whereas other CGH changes were seen throughout the tumor. Because the DNA from the severe hyperplasia with gains on chromosomes 6 and 15 came from an area of tissue that was not expressly visualized and microdissected, its genomic changes may reflect those of an occult tumor with EMT. CGH profiles for nonneoplastic tissues from the same ten mice (data not shown) and from two histologically normal mammary glands from separate transgenic lines were invariably normal. Thus, even with this sample size and despite using a statistic (Fisher’s exact test) that ignores consistency in direction and subchromosomal localization, the genomic changes on chromosomes 4, 7, 6, and 15 were remarkably nonrandom (p < 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.05, respectively).
Independent evidence for an association of mouse chromosome 15 with EMT was obtained from the p2S cells and their tumors. DNA gains in chromosome 15 were seen in the preinduced p2S10 and p2S7 cells and their tumors but not in the parental cells (Figure 7B). Identical gains in the middistal portion of chromosome 15 were seen in both microdissected spindle-cell and cartilage-like areas of p2S10 tumors but not in adjacent normal stroma, indicating that both areas arose from injected rather than host cells and that the cartilage-like areas represent a further manifestation of EMT. The preinduced cells and their tumors also showed amplifications on chromosomes 3, 5, and 11. Unlike the WAP-Str1 mammary tumors, no changes were seen on chromosomes 4, 7, or 6. Thus, although we studied relatively few samples, our data further implicate mouse chromo some 15 as significant for Str1-induced tumors that have undergone EMT.
An altered stromal environment appears to presage cancer development. In the case of WAP-Str1 transgenic mice, stromal defects appear (Thomasset et al., 1998) well before neoplastic changes are observed. In humans, cancer susceptibility is increased in certain fibrotic and chronic inflammatory conditions (Hsieh et al., 1998; Jacobs et al., 1999). Moreover, some inherited cancer syndromes result from gene defects that occur in stromal cells and induce stromal changes before epithelial abnormalities ever appear (Jacoby et al., 1997; Howe et al., 1998). These states of stromal remodeling and inflammation are precisely the conditions in which MMPs become upregulated (Mehindate et al., 1996). Thus, injury and inflammation may contribute to tumor development through MMPs that then promote the effects of carcinogens and preexisting gene defects. Likewise, the tumor promoter activity of phorbol esters may, in part, stem from their ability to upregulate stromal MMP expression (Gack et al., 1994).
Here we have shown that Str1 induces tumors in animals with and without an intact immune system. Using mammary epithelial cells that express Str1 in a Tet-regulated manner, we found that Str1 converts functionally normal mammary epithelial cells into highly infiltrative mesenchymal-like tumors in vivo. In an independent set of experiments, we demonstrated that Str1 induces spontaneous neoplastic progression in the mammary glands of WAP-Str1 transgenic mice. Although WAP-Str1 and MMTV-Str1 transgenic mice show similar proliferative changes in puberty (Sympson et al., 1994; Witty et al., 1995), neoplasms have not been described in MMTV-Str1 mice. This may reflect the reported quenching of MMTV-driven transgene expression during pregnancy, strain differences, or the long latency and low incidence of tumor formation that one would expect to see based on our own results. In WAP-Str1 mice, however, neoplastic changes arose without carcinogens or preexisting mutations, were mild or absent in the absence of Str1 expression, and were quenched by TIMP1 expression. Thus, Str1 can promote mammary carcinogenesis by virtue of its proteolytic activity.
Several other observations support the participation of stromal MMPs early in cancer development. Wild-type fibroblasts foster the growth of human breast cancer cells in nude mice, yet fibroblasts lacking MMP11/stromelysin-3 do not (Masson et al., 1998). MMP1/collagenase-1 transgenic mice show increased sensitivity to chemical carcinogens (D’Armiento et al., 1995), while MMP11 null mice have a reduced sensitivity to carcinogens (Masson et al., 1998). In addition, lack of either MMP9/gelatinase B or Str1 slows the development of squamous carcinomas in human papilloma virus-16 transgenic mice (L. M. Coussens, D. Hanahan, and Z. W., unpublished observations). Epithelial MMPs may also contribute to tumorigenesis. Indeed, the lack of MMP7/matrilysin slows intestinal adenoma formation in mice carrying the Apcmin mutation (Wilson et al., 1997), and its overexpression within mammary glands accelerates mammary tumorigenesis in mice carrying an MMTV-neu transgene (Rudolph-Owen et al., 1998). Thus, several MMPs may contribute to early neoplastic progression.
Our results also indicate that Str1 can trigger EMT in culture and in vivo. EMT occurs during normal embryonic development (Hay, 1995) and wound repair (SundarRaj et al., 1992) when adherent epithelia become migratory and invasive. Under such conditions, MMPs are highly expressed by adjacent mesenchymal cells (Chin and Werb, 1997). EMT also occurs in high-grade cancers (Birchmeier et al., 1996; Gilles and Thompson, 1996). The most aggressive human breast cancers undergo EMT, so they lack E-cadherin (Sommers et al., 1994), coexpress cytokeratins and vimentin (Domagala et al., 1990; Sommers et al., 1994), and express MMPs, such as Str1, that are otherwise confined to stromal cells (Ahmad et al., 1998; Martorana et al., 1998). Carcinosarcomas, which are among the most aggressive cancers, represent a compelling example of EMT (Gilles and Thompson, 1996). They are extremely uncommon in mice (Squartini and Pingitore, 1994) and account for only about 0.1% of all human breast cancers (Fisher et al., 1975), yet their rate of occurrence in Str1 transgenic mice appears unusually high. As their name implies, carcinosarcomas are composed of distinct malignant cell populations that exhibit epithelial and mesenchymal features, respectively. Thus, it is not surprising that the mesenchymal-like cells of carcinosarcomas express MMP11 (Ahmad et al., 1998), which is normally confined to adjacent stromal cells. The acquisition of mesenchymal features is also consistent with the induced expression of MMP genes, including endogenous Str1, in Str1-transfected cells that have undergone EMT (Lochter et al., 1997). Altered E-cadherin and β-catenin expression are also hallmarks of EMT (Kim et al., 1998; Sun et al., 1998). Thus, the E-cadherin cleavage and β-catenin re-distribution seen following Str1 induction (Lochter et al., 1997) may have signaling implications for both EMT and tumorigenicity (Christofori and Semb, 1999).
MMPs are not mutagens. Therefore, they must promote tumor development by virtue of their ability to affect cellular signaling (Werb, 1997). MMPs can alter cell–cell and cell–ECM interactions and release bioactive fragments (Lukashev and Werb, 1998; Noe et al., 1999). For example, Str1 cleaves cell surface proteins, including E-cadherin (Lochter et al., 1997), a tumor suppressor (Christofori and Semb, 1999). MMPs also release growth factors, angiogenic factors, and their inhibitors from the ECM and cell surface (Patterson and Sang, 1997; Suzuki et al., 1997) and cleave growth factor binding proteins (Fowlkes et al., 1994) and receptors (Levi et al., 1996). They can induce a reactive stroma and cause recruitment of other host cells (Thomasset et al., 1998), and they generate cleavage products that may compromise cellular cytotoxicity (Kataoka et al., 1999). Thus, there are several ways in which MMPs can influence all stages of cancer progression, including initiation.
We favor the hypothesis that MMPs act to trigger the E-cadherin/β-catenin pathway, which can be linked to several aspects of cancer, including EMT, invasion, and genomic instability (Tlsty, 1998; Noe et al., 1999). In support of our hypothesis, the E-cadherin cleavage and β-catenin redistribution seen with Str1-induced EMT are accompanied by upregulation of cyclin D1 (M. E. Lukashev and Z. W., unpublished results), a β-catenin-regulated oncogene (Tetsu and McCormick, 1999). Thus, Str1-induced E-cadherin cleavage may trigger both normal developmental and abnormal neoplastic changes.
MMPs also exert comparable effects in development and cancer. It is noteworthy that Str1 stimulates ductal proliferation and branching during puberty (Sympson et al., 1994; Witty et al., 1995) but induces apoptosis in anchorage-dependent secretory epithelium during pregnancy (Alexander et al., 1996; Thomasset et al., 1998). These seemingly contradictory actions can be reconciled by noting that the normal developmental fates of the target cells differ. Mammary ducts contain stem cells that are triggered to divide during branching morphogenesis. They also persist throughout involution, whereas alveolar cells do not. These effects are also consistent with the process of neoplastic transformation. The normal function of Str1 in inducing ductal proliferation and invasion during puberty is precisely what Str1 does to transformed mammary cells. Furthermore, although the induction of apoptosis in alveolar cells may defy tumorigenesis, it could also provide pressure for the selection of anchorage-independent, apoptosis-resistant clones and thereby foster tumorigenicity. Taken together with the propensity of Str1 to foster an altered stromal microenvironment (Thomasset et al., 1998), Str1 has the hallmarks of a multifactorial tumor promoter.
The presence of spontaneous tumors in Str1 transgenic mice indicates that Str1 promotes either the accumulation of mutations or the survival of mutant cells. By altering cellular adhesion, MMPs could conceivably alter cell cycle checkpoint controls and promote genomic instability (Tlsty, 1998). The presence of recurrent DNA losses in both premalignant and malignant mammary lesions in Str1 transgenic mice and of consistent DNA copy number gains in undifferentiated tumors suggests that these loci contain recessive- and dominant-acting genes that contribute to early and late cancer progression, respectively. They also support the hypothesis that MMPs can produce an abnormal stromal environment within which clones of epithelial cells containing selected mutations may accumulate. It is intriguing that the WAP-Str1 tumors are histologically diverse and arise late, suggesting a stochastic evolution, yet they exhibit stereotyped genomic changes, suggesting a common tumorigenic pathway. Several tumors did, however, exhibit the unifying feature of EMT together with consistent DNA gains on chromosomes 6 and 15. Although c-myc is located on mouse chromosome 15 (Adolph et al., 1987), its expression failed to correlate with DNA changes (M. D. S. et al., unpublished results). Thus, other relevant genes may reside at these loci.
Most of the genomic changes in the WAP-Str1 transgenic mice were distinct from those in other transgenic mammary tumor models. For example, p53-deficient Wnt-1 transgenicmice exhibit recurrent genomic changes on several chromosomes, including 4, but not 6, 7, or 15 (Donehower et al., 1995). Likewise, 82% of mammary tumors in MMTV-neu transgenic mice exhibit loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 4 (Ritland et al., 1997), and chromosome 4 deletions were also particularly prevalent in our own study. Thus, our results further implicate the middistal region of chromosome 4 as a potential tumor suppressor locus. Mammary tumors in SV40 T-antigen transgenic mice show consistent DNA gains in the telomeric region of chomosome 6 (Liu et al., 1998), rather than at its centromeric end as we observed in high-grade tumors of Str1 transgenic mice. Thus, our data also indicate a number of novel loci of potential importance.
If MMPs function in human cancer as they do in mice, then MMP mutations, amplifications, or polymorphisms may be associated with tumor development. Few studies have addressed this possibility despite the frequent cloning of MMPs as tumor-specific genes. Interestingly, a polymorphism in the human MMP1 gene promoter that creates a transcription-enhancing Ets site occurs more often in tumor cell lines than in the general population (Rutter et al., 1998). This suggests that enhanced MMP1 transcription may contribute to cancer susceptibility and supports the enhanced skin carcinogenesis seen in MMP1 transgenic mice (D’Armiento et al., 1995). Epigenetic inactivation of the TIMP3 promoter, seen often in human cancers (Bachman et al., 1999), could have similar implications. A functional polymorphism has also been found in the Str1 promoter (Ye et al., 1996); however, its role in cancer remains unexplored.
Our results may also have implications concerning the therapeutic use of MMP inhibitors. Inhibition of Str1 by overexpression of TIMP1 quenched its ability to promote neoplasia in transgenic mice, indicating that active Str1 is required and that neoplasia can be suppressed if its activity is inhibited early on. Thus, a compelling argument could be made for inhibiting Str1 during any stage of tumor progression. However, once the neoplastic process was triggered in Str1-transfected cells, tumors could still form without continued Str1 expression. Thus, our results also indicate that once Str1 effects alter the phenotype and genotype of mammary cells, its activity is no longer required for tumorigenicity. Likewise, cells induced to express Str1 for 6 days in culture continue to undergo progressive EMT despite addition of Tet and an MMP inhibitor (Lochter et al., 1997). Thus, the converted cells may perpetuate further EMT by an MMP-independent feedback mechanism. This “hit-and-run” action of Str1 is also in keeping with the capacity of MMPs to affect signaling. Thus, although MMPs are expressed throughout tumor progression, and although MMP inhibitors may defy invasion, other stages of progression may become resistant to anti-proteinase therapy targeting Str1. Whether this is true for other enzymes remains to be determined.
Our findings thus indicate that Str1 can promote early neoplastic changes, stereotyped genomic changes, and late phenotypic conversions associated with aggressive tumor behavior. They also support the hypothesis that an altered stromal environment can promote neoplastic transformation. Elucidation of the pathways downstream from Str1 will be critical for defining new molecular targets.
Recombinant human Str1 (0.8 mg/ml; a gift from Dr. M. Navre, Affymax Research Institute) was prepared as described previously (Lochter et al., 1999) and activated by treatment with trypsin for 30 min at 37°C, followed by addition of soybean trypsin inhibitor. Scp2 cells were treated every other day for 6 days with 1 µg/ml activated Str1 in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium containing 5 µg/ml insulin, 5 µg/ml transferrin, 5 ng/ml selenium, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin with or without the hydroxamic acid metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001 (10 µM; a gift from Dr. R. Galardy, Glycomed Corp.). All other culture and immunocytochemistry methods were performed as previously described (Lochter et al., 1997).
The developing epithelial parenchyma of abdominal (#4) mammary glands was removed from weanling scid/scid mice (DeOme et al., 1959), and 1 × 106 Scp2 or p2S cells in serum-free medium were injected into residual gland-free mammary fat pads or subcutaneously at the nape of the neck. Mice were maintained for 6 or more weeks with or without 10 µg/ml Tet in their drinking water. Inhibition of enzymatic activity by intraperitoneal injection of GM6001 (100 mg/kg/day) was not pursued, due to inhibited wound repair and postsurgical morbidity that was not seen for the carrier (4% carboxy-methylcellulose in PBS). Tumor volumes were calculated as length × width2/2.
CD1 mice with an autoactivating rat Str1 transgene targeted to mammary epithelium by the murine WAP gene promoter were generated as described (Sympson et al., 1994). Five independent transgenic founder lines (M2-5, M2-20, M2-21, M2-25, and M1-9), their nontransgenic littermates, and two transgenic sublines that had lost expression of the transgene (M2-5N and M2-21N) were analyzed. All mice were housed under similar conditions, and a similar fraction from each group (approximately one-third) was carried through pregnancy and lactation. The CA10 WAP gene promoter (Sympson et al., 1994) was also used to generate transgenic mice overexpressing a human TIMP1 transgene (Alexander et al., 1996). These mice expressed human TIMP1 protein primarily during pregnancy and lactation (data not shown). WAP-TIMP1 mice were crossed with one line (M2-5) of WAP-Str1 mice to generate double transgenics. Half of these were carried through at least one pregnancy and lactation.
Mammary whole mounts (Sympson et al., 1994) were photodocumented and reprocessed for paraffin embedment. Hematoxylin/eosin, Masson’s trichrome, and Alcian blue staining were by standard methods. Antigen retrieval was by brief 0.4 µg/ml proteinase K digestion for vimentin or by microwave heating in citrate buffer. Before adding peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated reagents, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with a methanol/H2O2 solution. Immunolocalization was by rat anti-mouse cytokeratin-8 (a gift from Dr. R. Kemler; 1:50) and biotinylated rabbit anti-rat IgG (Vector Laboratories; 1:200), HRP-conjugated mouse anti-bovine vimentin (DAKO; prediluted), or biotinylated rat anti-mouse smooth muscle actin (a gift from Dr. L. R. Lund; 1:50). Biotinylated antibodies were detected with avidin-biotin-HRP complexes. HRP activity was visualized with diaminobenzidine, and nuclei were counterstained with Meyer’s hematoxylin.
DNAs were extracted from cultured cells, frozen tissues, or paraffin blocks by standard methods or from lightly stained paraffin sections after laser microdissection (Emmert-Buck et al., 1996). Reference and test DNAs labeled with Texas red-5-dCTP and fluorescein-12-dCTP, respectively, were hybridized to normal metaphase chromosome spreads; chromosomes were identified by 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counterstaining; and green:red fluorescence intensity profiles were obtained as previously described (Bain et al., 1997).
We thank R. Boudreau, J. Xie, D. R. Williams, Y.-P. Shi, and Drs. R. D. Cardiff, M. E. Lukashev, S. Galosy, and H. Sanchez for their assistance. This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA57621, CA72006, and CA64786), the UCSF Breast Cancer SPORE (Bishop Fund), the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (DAMD17-97-1-7246), the California Breast Cancer Research Program (to A. L.), the Association pour la Recherche Contre le Cancer (to J.-P. R.), and the United States Department of Energy (DE-AC03-76-SF00098).