PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Bioconjug Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 12.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2853010
NIHMSID: NIHMS190280

Surface Engineering of Quantum Dots for In Vivo Vascular Imaging

Abstract

Quantum dot–antibody bioconjugates (QD-mAb) were synthesized incorporating PEG cross-linkers and Fc-shielding mAb fragments to increase in vivo circulation times and targeting efficiency. Microscopy of endothelial cell cultures incubated with QD-mAb directed against cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), when shielded to reduce Fc-mediated interactions, were more specific for their molecular targets. In vitro flow cytometry indicated that surface engineered QD-mAb labeled leukocyte subsets with minimal Fc-mediated binding. Nontargeted QD-mAb nanoparticles with Fc-blockade featured 64% (endothelial cells) and 53% (leukocytes) lower nonspecific binding than non-Fc-blocked nanoparticles. Spectrally distinct QD-mAb targeted to the cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) PECAM-1, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 on the retinal endothelium in a rat model of diabetes were imaged in vivo using fluorescence angiography. Endogenously labeled circulating and adherent leukocyte subsets were imaged in rat models of diabetes and uveitis using QD-mAb targeted to RP-1 and CD45. Diabetic rats exhibited increased fluorescence in the retinal vasculature from QD bioconjugates to ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 but not PECAM-1. Both animal models exhibited leukocyte rolling and leukostasis in capillaries. Examination of retinal whole mounts prepared after in vivo imaging confirmed the fluorescence patterns seen in vivo. Comparison of the timecourse of retinal fluorescence from Fc-shielded and non-Fc-shielded bioconjugates indicated nonspecific uptake and increased clearance of the non-Fc-shielded QD-mAb. This combination of QD surface design elements offers a promising new in vivo approach to specifically label vascular cells and biomolecules of interest.

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation is a complex process involving numerous cell types and surface proteins. It is characterized by leukocyte rolling and tethering along endothelial cells followed by transmigration into tissue, where their immunodefensive functions, such as phagocytosis, are elicited (1, 2). Undesirable provocation of the inflammatory response is thought to be a detrimental feature of numerous diseases such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, and asthma (36). Treatment of inflammatory disease is challenging due to uncertainties associated with the roles of many of the cellular and biomolecular mediators. However, one developing strategy hinders inflammation by blockade of cell surface receptors either on the endothelium or on circulating leukocytes (79).

Detailed information about molecular mediators of inflammation might be acquired through in vivo imaging methods, since they can provide real-time data concerning the spatial and temporal dynamics of cellular activities and molecular expression throughout the time course of the disease. However, disadvantages of current imaging techniques include limited optical accessibility to tissue, invasiveness (10, 11), low or unstable signal intensity due to the use of organic fluorophores (1214), or low spatial and temporal resolution achieved by the use of radiolabeled antibodies (15). No available technique provides a framework for the simultaneous imaging of multiple molecular participants on moving leukocytes and stationary endothelium and leukocytes in real time.

Imaging inflammation is a difficult task, as the cell types of interest have one or more of the Fcγ receptor family (CD16, CD32, and CD64) which bind to Fc fragments of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies with variable affinity (16). Binding of bioconjugates to these receptors can yield false positive results when attempting to detect vascular cell surface targets. In addition, it is well-known that nanoparticulate probes are subject to rapid uptake by the tissues of the reticuloendothelial system, such as liver and spleen (17). These immunodefensive mechanisms serve to either rapidly clear the probe from the circulation or nonspecifically bind the probe. However, the many advantages afforded by nanoparticles as bioconjugates, particularly quantum dots (QD), which feature size-tunable visible-IR emission spectra, the need for only one excitation source, and high quantum efficiency, warrant new methods to facilitate their continued application (18, 19). Recent work has indicated that the surface functionalization of PEG chains on the quantum dot surface can substantially reduce nonspecificity and clearance problems (20, 21). In addition, many studies have established QD amenability to bioconjugation and ease of encapsulation in water-soluble coatings (22), and its incorporation within targeted in vivo imaging applications (20, 23, 24).

In this study, we selected spectrally distinct quantum dot (QD) nanocrystals to enable high-resolution, multispecies imaging using a previously developed, noninvasive in vivo retinal vascular imaging system (25). In this application, which pursues the detection of vascular targets, mitigation of nonspecific uptake and clearance mechanisms are essential. To address this, monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting leukocytes, neutrophils (26), or the cell adhesion molecules PECAM-1, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were site-specifically conjugated to PEG-maleimide-activated QD surfaces via 2-MEA to preserve mAb orientation and binding affinity (27). QD-mAb were then adsorbed with Fc-blocking F(ab)2 fragments to reduce nonspecific immunorecognition. When incubated with endothelial cells or leukocytes in vitro, the shielded probes were found to be more specific for their targets relative to controls. In vivo retinal imaging of streptozotocin (STZ)-treated diabetic rats using QD-mAb revealed upregulation of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 but not PECAM-1. Imaging of a rat model of endotoxin-induced uveitis (EIU) showed the expected increase in stagnant leukocytes in the microcirculation. The high photostability of QD permitted post-experimental histological observations which confirmed the in vivo results. Real-time imaging of QD-IgG1 conjugates indicated rapid clearance of conjugates lacking Fc-blocking F(ab)2 fragments from the circulation. The distinct spectral emission characteristics of the QD enabled the simultaneous imaging of up to four biomarkers or cell types within the same animal with high specificity.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Synthesis and Characterization of Shielded Quantum Dot-Antibody Conjugates

QD nanocrystals with approximately 80 NH2 groups/nanoparticle (ITK–NH2, Invitrogen Corp.) were surface-functionalized with a heterobifunctional PEG-based cross-linker (NHS-PEG-MAL, Nektar Therapeutics) to couple reduced antibodies to the surface, followed by Fc-shielding F(ab)2 surface adsorption as shown in Scheme 1. (1) 1 uM of QD-ITK-NH2 (1.2 × 1014 nanoparticles in 200 uL solution) were maleimide-activated by incubation with a 20-fold molar excess of NHS-PEG-MAL (MW: 5218) for 2 h in PBS with 10 mM EDTA, pH = 7.4 (PBS-EDTA) at room temperature. Excess NHS-PEG-MAL was removed using two exchanges of PBS-EDTA on a 100K MWCO Amicon Ultra-4 column. The solution was analyzed qualitatively for the presence of large aggregates (> 200 nm) using fluorescence microscopy, and was filtered through a 100 nm syringe filter if aggregates were observed. (2) mAb (Table 1) were buffer-exchanged in 500 µg amounts into PBS-EDTA, with two exchanges on a 100K MWCO spin column device (Amicon Ultra-4, Millipore) according to manufacturer-supplied instructions. The retentate was resuspended to 10 mg/mL concentration in PBS-EDTA. The antibodies were then reduced specifically in the hinge region to create two monovalent IgG (r IgG) bearing 1–2 free sulfhydryl groups using 2-mercaptoethylamine (2-MEA, Pierce) (28) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 6 mg of 2-MEA was dissolved in 100 µL of PBS-EDTA, and 1 µL of this solution was added to each 10 µL of mAb solution. The mixture was reacted for 120 min at 37 °C on a slowly rocking platform. Excess 2-MEA was removed from mAb using a NAP-5 desalting column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with degassed PBS-EDTA buffer according to manufacturer’s instructions. The presence of free sulfhydryl groups generated from 2-MEA reduction was confirmed using Ellman’s reagent (Pierce) on a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer according to manufacturer’s instructions. (3) The QD retentate from 1 was then added to the 2-MEA reduced and purified r IgG mixtures and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The following day, the reaction was terminated with 1 mg/mL l-cysteine (Sigma) to quench remaining maleimide groups. The QD-r IgG conjugates were purified by gel filtration chromatography according to manufacturer’s instructions (Superdex 200, GE Healthcare). Fractions were eluted with PBS into 96-well microplates and evaluated by a UV–vis and fluorescence spectrophotometry (Nanodrop ND-1000 and ND-3300) or a fluorescence microplate spectrophotometer (Biotek Synergy HT) in order to identify appropriate QD-mAb fractions and to evaluate conjugation efficiency. In six separate conjugations of r IgG2a to QD655, the average conjugation efficiency measured by UV–vis absorbance spectrophotometry on pooled QD-bound and unbound r IgG fractions was 59.33 ± 11.34%. This corresponds to 18 r IgG/QD. (4) The bioconjugate fraction was incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG (Fc-specific) blocking F(ab)2 (Sigma) at molar concentrations equal to primary antibody concentrations for 1 h at room temperature, and the resulting mixture was filtered through a 0.22 µm syringe filter and stored at 4 °C until use. On the day of animal imaging, bioconjugates were briefly spun in an Eppendorf 5415R microcentrifuge for 10 min at 10 000 g to remove QD-mAb aggregates, reserving the supernatant for use. The supernatant was examined by fluorescence microscopy to ensure the absence of QD aggregates (> 200 nm).

Table 1
Quantum Dot-mAb Conjugates

Flow Cytometry

Whole blood was collected in 2 × 3 mL aliquots from male Long-Evans rats into BD Vacutainer tubes spray-lined with K3EDTA. Erythrocytes were lysed by incubation with BD PharMLyse at a 20:1 ratio of lysis buffer to whole blood for 15 min in the dark at room temperature to obtain a diffuse red suspension of white blood cells. The solution was then centrifuged at 400 g in an Allegra X-22R unit with swinging bucket rotor (Beckman) at room temperature. The leukocyte pellet was rinsed in 500 µL PBS (pH = 7.2) containing 0.5% BSA, and 0.1% sodium azide (staining buffer) to reduce shedding of membrane antigens. Each pellet was rinsed twice with staining buffer. The cells were resuspended to a 1 × 106 leukocytes/mL concentration, and were incubated for 45 min with one of the following in staining buffer: 50 nM each of QD585-anti-RP-1 conjugate, QD585-anti-CD45 conjugate, Fc-blocked QD585-isotype control IgG1, maleimide-activated and l-cysteine quenched QD585, Fc-blocked QD585-isotype control IgG2a, non-Fc-blocked QD585-IgG2a isotype control, or 1 ug phycoerythrin (PE)-anti-RP-1 conjugate (BD Pharmingen). A separate unlabeled fraction was also retained for analysis. All samples were immediately analyzed (n = 20,000 gated events) using a BD LSR II multicolor flow cytometer equipped with a 488 nm Ar laser. Rat leukocyte subtypes could be readily resolved by forward and side scatter profiles as previously described (29). Band-pass emission filters were set at 585/42 nm to analyze QD or PE-labeled cells. Analysis was conducted using Flowjo 7.0 (Treestar Software).

Cell Culture and Immunofluorescence Microscopy

YPEN-1 (CRL-2222, ATCC) rat prostate endothelial cells were cultured to confluency on Lab-Tek II 8-well chambered coverslips with media containing minimum essential medium (Eagle) with 2 mM l-glutamine and Earle’s BSS adjusted to contain 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, and 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate, supplemented with 0.03 mg/mL heparin; fetal bovine serum, 5%. YPEN-1 were stimulated with 30 ng/mL TNF-α in media overnight as previously described (30) to upregulate cell adhesion molecules, or incubated with media alone as a control. The next day, YPEN-1 were rinsed with one wash of media and incubated with 10 nM amounts of QD bioconjugates for 1 h at 37 °C as follows: QD655-anti-PECAM, QD655-anti-ICAM, QD655-anti-VCAM, QD655 (reactive maleimide group quenched with 1 mg/mL l-cysteine), and QD-isotype control IgG1 in Fc-blocked forms as described above or as synthesized without the Fc-blocking step. Cells were then rinsed six times in Dulbecco’s PBS containing Ca and Mg, pH = 7.4, and incubated with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at 25 °C, followed by rinsing three times, 5 min each, with PBS with 50 mM glycine. Fixed cells were imaged using a Nikon TE2000U inverted fluorescence microscope with filter settings as shown in Table 1. These experiments were performed in triplicate. Images were acquired using a Hammamatsu C7780 12-bit color CCD in conjunction with Image Pro Plus 5.1 (Media Cybernetics).

Preparation of Animal Subjects

All experimental procedures were approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Diabetes was induced in Long-Evans rats by intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ, Sigma) in 0.1 mM sodium citrate, pH = 4.5, with the same number of rats remaining untreated as experimental controls (n = 6 per group). Elevated blood sugar (> 250 mg/dL) was confirmed in STZ treated animals. Endotoxin-induced uveitis (EIU) was initiated in Long-Evans rats by intraperitoneal injection of 200 µg lipopolysaccharide. Controls were age-matched untreated rats (n = 6 per group). Animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneally administered 15/85% ketazine/xylazine prior to imaging. Tail vein catheterization was performed for injection of QD-mAb. Both eyes were dilated with 1 drop each of 2.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride and 1% tropicamide ophthalmic solutions (Alcon). The right eye was placed on the plano-concave lens previously filled with 2% methyl cellulose (Aqua Poly-Mount, Polysciences).

In Vivo Retinal Imaging

Our imaging design is based on a previously published technique (25), in which an inverted fluorescence microscope (TE2000U Eclipse, Nikon) with 4× and 10× objectives and a plano-concave −6 D lens (Edmund Scientific) on the microscope stage were utilized to image the rat retinal circulation. In this study, this technique was modified to include a high sensitivity Andor Bioimaging iXon 885 EMCCD camera (Andor Bioimaging), Hamamatsu C7780 color camera, Exfo X-cite 120 metal halide lamp (Exfo Life Sciences), and a pulsed xenon arc flashlamp excitation source (FX 4400, Perkin-Elmer) triggered by a function generator configured for square wave output at 20 Hz (Tektronix). The metal halide lamp and flashlamp were utilized for the imaging of stationary endothelial targets and circulating leukocytes, respectively. Following measurements of pre-injection tissue autofluorescence levels in each QD-specific emission channel, QD-mAb were injected via the tail vein catheter. Injectate consisted of 200 µL of a 500 nM solution in PBS-EDTA. Initial digital sequences were acquired using exposures ranging from 20 to 200 ms (depending on the QD and the filter set, Table 1) at 110 ms intervals. Subsequent sequences were acquired at approximately 30 min intervals for 2.5 h. In four animals, a QD-IgG1 isotype control was used as a negative control. Animals were sacrificed with 150 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital administered via tail vein catheter.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy of Retinal Tissue

Following euthanization of animals, both eyes were enucleated. Retinal flat mounts were prepared of the right eye, which was the eye imaged by our in vivo retinal imaging system. Eyes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight and flat-mounted on a microscope slide mounted with fluorescence mounting media. The left eye was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and paraffin embedded for sectioning. Sections and flat mounts were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon TE 2000U) using the same filters as those used in in vivo imaging (Table 1).

Image Analysis

For analysis of QD-mAb binding to YPEN-1, fluorescence micrographs acquired under identical settings and conditions (matched cell densities in field of view) were measured in the Red CCD channel (the chip with which QD655 emission is captured) for fluorescence intensity using Image Pro Plus 5.1. From these data, the mean Red channel fluorescence intensity was obtained and standard deviation determined. Background correction was performed on image intensities by subtracting the mean Red CCD channel intensity obtained from the same density of unlabeled YPEN-1. Intensities were analyzed for statistical significance using an unpaired two-tailed t-test (SigmaStat 3.0, SYSTAT). Background-corrected data was then plotted using SigmaPlot 9.0 (SYSTAT). Statistical significance was interpreted by P < 0.05.

For in vivo image quantification of leukostasis, the area of image analysis of rat fundi was a circle of two optic disk diameters from the center, allowing for counts of stagnant leukocytes and observations of leukocyte trafficking and cell adhesion molecule expression within major arteries and veins as well as the microcirculation. A leukocyte was assumed to be stagnant if no displacement larger than one cell diameter was observed within 60 s of continuous imaging. The number of stagnant QD-labeled cells was quantified for STZ, EIU, and wild-type retinas postacquisition from digital video using Andor iQ 1.6, and compared using an unpaired two-tailed t-test in SigmaStat 3.0.

Quantitative analysis of Fc-blocked and non-Fc-blocked QD-IgG1 bioconjugates was performed by analyzing 60 consecutive digital frames of wild-type rat retina before and after systemic injection of 500 nM (200 uL) of each probe. An observation area of 2 optic disc diameters from center was utilized for the analysis. Using Andor iQ 1.6 image analysis software, the mean fluorescence intensity of 60 consecutive frames was plotted as a function of time. Data were plotted using SigmaPlot 9.0.

RESULTS

In Vitro Studies

In cell culture studies, the QD655-mAb Fc-shielded conjugates specifically labeled CAMs on TNF-α-stimulated YPEN-1 rat endothelium (TNF+) (Figure 1A–D; Figure 2B,E). In order to simulate the in vivo environment, no traditional immunofluorescence blocking steps (e.g., serum, Fc receptor blocking mAbs) were utilized. Under TNF+ conditions, a statistically significant increase in Fc-blocked QD655-anti-VCAM binding to YPEN-1 (Figure 1B,D) was observed, whereas TNF+ conditions did not significantly affect QD655-anti-PECAM binding (Figure 1A). These observations were consistent with previous reports (31, 32). QD655-anti-ICAM bioconjugates bound TNF+ YPEN-1 by over 10-fold as compared to untreated cells (Figure 2E). A strong reduction in nonspecific binding was observed when comparing binding of Fc-blocked and non-Fc-blocked QD655-anti-ICAM bioconjugates (Figure 2A,B,E). A reduction in nonspecific binding was also observed when comparing measured intensities of YPEN-1 labeled with Fc-blocked or non-Fc-blocked QD655-isotype control IgG1 nanoparticles (Figure 2C–E), suggesting that the Fc fragment is responsible for a substantial percentage of QD-mAb nonspecific binding. Immunofluorescence analysis of YPEN-1 indicated that non-Fc-blocked QD655-mAb constructs were aggregated in focal locations along cell membranes, shown by arrowheads (Figure 2A–C). This observation may be due to two features: the upregulation of Fcγ receptors on endothelial cells following TNF-α stimulation, and the patching and capping effect observed previously for Fc receptor–ligand combinations (33). Specifically, patching and capping refers to the accumulation of surface-bound IgG-Fc receptor pairs at distinct, punctate locations at the membrane to form clumps of Fc receptor-IgG pairs. This incidence of cap formation was less evident in TNF+ YPEN-1 cells incubated with Fc-blocked bioconjugates (Figure 2B). Maleimide-quenched QD which were not conjugated to Mab (Figure 1C) did not bind appreciably to cell surfaces. These data collectively suggest that nonspecific binding of unshielded probe was likely due to the binding of mAb Fc fragment to endothelial Fc receptors.

Figure 1
Evaluation of Fc-blocked QD-mAb conjugate specificity toward TNF-α stimulated (TNF+) or untreated (TNF−, image insets) rat endothelial cells (YPEN-1). (A–C) Fluorescence micrographs of QD655-anti-PECAM (A), QD655-anti-VCAM (B), ...
Figure 2
Comparison of Fc-blocked and non-Fc-blocked QD655-mAb conjugate specificity toward TNF-α-stimulated YPEN-1 (TNF+). (A–B) TNF+ YPEN-1 incubated with non-Fc-blocked (A) and Fc-blocked (B) QD655-anti-ICAM bioconjugates (magnification 100×). ...

Fc-blocked QD585-anti-RP-1 (neutrophils) and QD585-anti-CD45 (leukocyte common antigen) were shown to retain bioactivity and specificity in vitro (Figure 3). QD585-anti-RP-1 conjugates were shown to specifically bind to neutrophils and not other leukocyte subsets (Figure 3A), and QD585-anti-CD45 were shown to label the three main subclasses of leukocytes as shown by flow cytometric analysis of erythrocyte-lysed whole blood (Figure 3B,D). QD-anti-RP-1 was observed to have over 4-fold enhancement in fluorescence over PE-RP-1 (1003 vs 233), a positive control antibody coupled to phycoerythrin (Figure 3C). QD585-IgG2a (matching the isotype of QD585-anti-RP-1), when Fc-blocked with an anti-Fc F(ab)2 fragment, featured 53% lower mean fluorescence levels than that due to the non-Fc-blocked conjugate (Figure 3C), indicative of reduced nonspecific binding of Fc-blocked bioconjugates. Fc-blocked QD585-anti-CD45 conjugates used to label leukocytes yielded a mean fluorescence of 1430, over 17-fold greater than cells labeled with Fc-blocked QD-IgG1 isotype control (82) and 22-fold greater than unlabeled cells (65) (Figure 3D).

Figure 3
FACS analysis of leukocytes labeled with QD-mAb bioconjugates in vitro. (A) QD585-anti-RP-1 (Fc-blocked) specific labeling of neutrophils in peripheral blood. (B) QD585-anti-CD45 (Fc-blocked) labeling of all leukocyte subsets, with arrow from B to D indicating ...

In Vivo Imaging

Intravenous injection of QD bioconjugates targeted to ICAM-1 or VCAM-1 resulted in a maximum increase in vascular fluorescence in streptozotocin (STZ)-treated diabetic rats within 30 and 90 min, respectively (Figure 4). This increase in fluorescence was observed in major vessels as well as the microcirculation. Control rat retinas did not exhibit the same fluorescence intensity with either the ICAM (Figure 4A–C) or VCAM (Figure 4D–F) conjugates. Injection of QD anti-PECAM produced increases in fluorescence which were similar in both STZ-treated and untreated animals (Figure 4G–I). Injection of QD-IgG1, a nonspecific control, did not result in fluorescence signal accumulation in the retinal vasculature to any appreciable degree throughout the duration of imaging up to 2.5 h (Figure 4J–L).

Figure 4
Frames from in vivo digital videos of STZ treated and untreated rat retinas. Pre-injection digital videos using the appropriate fluorescence filters for the spectrally distinct biomarkers of interest (left column; A, D, G, J) were acquired prior to bioconjugate ...

Intravenous injection of QD585-anti-RP-1 conjugates enabled the fluorescence detection and long-term tracking of neutrophils in STZ-treated diabetic animals as shown in Figure 5A–D. Using a pulsed xenon flashlamp, we visualized individual free-flowing leukocytes (Figure 5A,B), leukocyte rolling along endothelial walls (Figure 5C), and leukostasis (Figure 5D) in major vessels as well as capillaries. Individual neutrophils were resolved in all vessels including arteries, and an increase in QD-anti-RP-1 positive stagnant neutrophils in the microcirculation was observed in the STZ-treated group (5.83 ± 2.86, n = 6) vs untreated animals (0.50 ± 0.55, n = 6) (P < 0.01). Fluorescence micrographs of stagnant neutrophils in flat-mounted STZ-treated rat retinas confirmed in vivo observations (Figure 5G).

Figure 5
In vivo imaging of endogenously QD-mAb-labeled leukocyte trafficking in two rat models of inflammation. The CCD acquired images with exposure times ranging from 50 to 200 ms with 110 ms between exposures. Flowing of QD585-RP-1 labeled cells in vessels ...

Injection of the QD655-anti-CD45 bioconjugate in LPS-treated EIU rat models revealed a significant number of stagnant leukocytes in the microcirculation relative to untreated animals (Figure 5E,F). The number of QD-anti-CD45 positive stagnant leukocytes in LPS-treated rat retinas (20.33 ± 8.73, n = 6) was elevated over control retinas (2.17 ± 1.17, n = 6) in vivo (P < 0.01).

Ten seconds after tail vein injection, comparison of the retinal fluorescence from Fc-shielded and non-Fc-shielded bioconjugates showed significantly less fluorescence from the non-shielded bioconjugate (Figure 6). Tracers injected intravenously into a tail vein travel through the hepatic circulation, heart, and lungs before the remainder reaches the eye. Our data indicate that non-Fc-blocked nonspecific QD-IgG1 is cleared rapidly within 2 h of circulation, returning retinal fluorescence levels to pre-injection values (Figure 6E–H,J). For Fc-blocked nonspecific QD-IgG1, an apparent bolus is observed within 12 s of injection (Figure 6B), and fluorescence levels by 2 h have not returned to background values (Figure 6A–D,I). These results suggest that Fc blockade substantially enhances the circulation lifetime of the QD-mAb due to reduced uptake and clearance.

Figure 6
Comparison of Fc-blocked (A–D, I) and non-Fc-blocked (E–H, J) QD-IgG1 mAb bioconjugates in vivo. (A) Pre-injection autofluorescence in QD655 emission channel. (B–D) Fc-blocked QD655-IgG1 in retina observed 12 s postinjection (B) ...

Ex Vivo Imaging of Retinal Tissue

Immunofluorescence analysis of flat-mounted retinas showed correlation of in vivo features, such as enhanced CAM expression areas within the microcirculation, with ex vivo microscopy (Figure 7A,B). Analysis of postmortem retinal tissue also indicated low nonspecific binding of Fc-shielded bioconjugates (Figure 7C,D) within blood vessels. The microcirculation in a flat mount from an EIU rat featured leukocyte adhesions and extravasations similar to those observed in vivo (not shown), and similar to the result shown for the STZ-treated rat (Figure 5G).

Figure 7
In vivo microcirculatory VCAM-1 expression (A) can be confirmed using immunofluorescence analysis postmortem (B), as shown for QD655-anti-VCAM-1 labeled vasculature. While QD655-VCAM-1 (Fc-blocked) conjugates were shown to specifically stain vasculature ...

DISCUSSION

Fc-blocked QD-mAb were found to be specific for CAM and leukocyte targets, as shown by immunofluorescence (Figure 1, Figure 2), flow cytometry (Figure 3), and in vivo and ex vivo retinal imaging (Figure 4Figure 7). QD-IgG that were nonspecific in reactivity did not bind to retinal vasculature (Figure 6), which suggests that Fc-blocked QD-antibody bioconjugates feature reduced nonspecific binding tendencies while retaining the native binding affinity conferred by the mAb. Our technique, employing PEGylation, 2-MEA reduction, and Fc-blockade by Fc-specific F(ab)2, is a rapid, cost-effective method for the site-specific bioconjugation and immune-shielding of mAb on nanoparticle surfaces. The 2-MEA reduction process was found to work equally well on mouse IgG1 and IgG2a subclasses using the same protocol. As an alternative to removal of the Fc fragment from the antibody, we choose instead to adsorb it with an antibody fragment which itself has no Fc region. Nontargeted QD-IgG conjugates adsorbed with an Fc-blocking F(ab)2 were less susceptible to nonspecific binding to leukocyte and endothelial cell surfaces compared to the same conjugates without Fc-blockade (Figure 1Figure 3). This may be the result of steric inhibition conferred upon the bioconjugate by the F(ab)2, which reduces Fc receptor access to its Fc fragment binding site on the IgG. Fc-blockade of CAM-targeted QD did not affect their binding affinities toward endothelial cell proteins in vitro or in vivo (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 4). Fc-blockade by itself also may potentially enhance the circulation half-life of QD-mAb when employed in conjunction with PEG. Fc-blocked, nontargeted QD-IgG were present in the retinal circulation in much higher fluorescence levels relative to the same dose of non-Fc-blocked constructs (Figure 6), suggesting that Fc-blockade of IgG may substantially reduce first-pass nonspecific clearance of probes due to liver and spleen immunorecognition. Therefore, our probe design features target selectivity with a reduced tendency for nonspecific binding.

Analogues of our strategy exist for reduction of nonspecific binding of bioconjugates for in vitro applications, and we have applied these in vitro techniques for the first time to in vivo imaging. For example, the commercial reagent FcBlock (anti-CD16, anti-CD32, BD Biosciences) has long been utilized to block Fc receptors on hematopoietic and endothelial cells prior to immunofluorescence (34) or flow cytometric (35) analysis for the reduction of background staining using cell surface protein antibodies. Direct blockade of the Fc fragment of antibodies rather than Fc receptors occurs often in biology. Blockade of the antibody Fc domain with streptococcal proteins has been found to reduce Fc-mediated nonspecific binding (36). Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1), when bound by an IgG, uses its Fcγ receptors to occupy the Fc fragment of the same IgG, thus preventing Fc-mediated immunodefensive mechanisms (37). By adsorption of the QD-IgG conjugate with an Fc-targeted F(ab)2, it is likely that the adsorbed fragment makes the Fc binding site of the targeting antibody sufficiently inaccessible to immune surveillance, thus enhancing specificity and circulation time.

Other strategies to reduce Fc-mediated immune recognition of antibodies or antibody-based bioconjugates are reported in the literature. Specifically, antibody fragmentation techniques using papain, pepsin, or ficin require several reaction steps and much reagent quantity and time optimization for each antibody species and subclass, and generally do not yield a biomolecule with a site-specific cross-linking site suitable for nanoparticle conjugation. Instead, primary amines which reside in the antigen-binding site of the antibody could be cross-linked to the nanoparticle, obliterating its antigen binding affinity following bioconjugation. Protein engineering techniques now provide for a means of producing antibody fragments with engineered hinge region cysteines (Fab′) which allow for site-specific nanoparticle conjugation while preserving the antigen-binding region (38, 39). However, this process is time-consuming and costly, and may not be suitable in applications where multiple IgGs are to be conjugated to nanoparticles for multiplexed imaging on a small scale, or where IgG targets are quickly examined and replaced for purposes of drug discovery or biology. Our process provides for the site-specific conjugation of antibodies to nanoparticles, without IgG subclass-specific optimization, with similar benefits of immune system evasion afforded by antibody fragmentation techniques.

Our in vivo imaging results are consistent with studies of ICAM and VCAM expression in diabetic and nondiabetic tissue, in which their upregulation is implicated in an inflammatory cascade that causes various complications of the disease (6, 40, 41). QD fluorescence due to ICAM and VCAM expression is apparent on major vessels as well as the microcirculation in disease models, which appears as an out of focus fluorescent background behind the major vessels (Figure 4A–F). QD targeted against PECAM, a panendothelial marker, produced increases in fluorescence which were similar in both STZ-treated and untreated animals (Figure 4G–I), thus suggesting its utility as an internal control or vascular counterstain in this imaging application. Our technique was found to be suitable for the long-term imaging of stagnant leukocytes commonly observed in both the STZ-treated rat model of diabetes (6, 9) and the LPS-treated rat model of EIU (42).

Photobleaching is a problem with current techniques which probe leukocyte dynamics in vivo, such as acridine orange fluorography (43, 44). Thus, long-term imaging of leukocytes is hindered. Using QD-based fluorography, we were able to continuously observe entrapped leukocytes in the circulation over an hour of continuous illumination without bleaching (Figure 5). Therefore, our QD-based imaging technique constitutes a potential alternative to current methods of imaging leukocytes due to the ability to simultaneously image multiple leukocyte subsets and stationary biomarkers with one excitation source with high specificity.

Our imaging technique provides noninvasive optical access to the in vivo retinal vasculature and continuous monitoring of vascular events. Spatial resolution on the order of a cell is achieved with this technique. QD have superior optical properties, such as high quantum efficiency and photostability, as well as distinct size-tunable emission wavelengths with the need for only one excitation source. By harnesseing these QD properties while immune-shielding the nanoparticle surface, it was readily possible to image three CAMs and one leukocyte subset within the same animal, without spectral overlap, using one blue excitation source to sufficiently illuminate QD-tagged species within the circulation. This feature enables detailed multiplexed studies of disease and biological processes. We used this approach to simultaneously observe the molecular expression of three different biomarkers, while also observing leukocyte-endothelial interactions. Other applications of this imaging strategy could readily be applied to studies in which multiple cellular and biomolecular vascular functions remain to be elucidated such as cancer, ocular angiogenesis, and atherosclerosis. While qualitative information was primarily presented in this initial application of our technique, we foresee the calculation of additional parameters including rolling velocities for various subtypes, relative fluorescence intensities of specific biomolecules along vascular walls, density of entrapped leukocytes, and important features of the inflammatory process in vivo.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank J.M. Higginbotham for assistance with flow cytometry, E.J. Dworska for assistance with tissue culture, and D.W. Piston for flash trigger equipment. This work was supported, in part, by grants from the National Institutes of Health (F.R. Haselton, PI, EY13451, EY017522), Vanderbilt University Discovery Grant Program, and Vanderbilt Vision Research Training Grant (J.D. Schall, PI, T32-EY07135-13).

LITERATURE CITED

1. Kaneider NC, Leger AJ, Kuliopulos A. Therapeutic targeting of molecules involved in leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions. FEBS J. 2006;273:4416–4424. [PubMed]
2. Cook-Mills JM, Deem TL. Active participation of endothelial cells in inflammation. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2005;77:487–495. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Frieri M. Asthma concepts in the new millennium: update in asthma pathophysiology. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2005;26:83–88. [PubMed]
4. Ulbrich H, Eriksson EE, Lindbom L. Leukocyte and endothelial cell adhesion molecules as targets for therapeutic interventions in inflammatory disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2003;24:640–647. [PubMed]
5. Wellen KE, Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation, stress, and diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 2005;115:1111–1119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Joussen AM, Poulaki V, Le ML, Koizumi K, Esser C, Janicki H, Schraermeyer U, Kociok N, Fauser S, Kirchhof B, Kern TS, Adamis AP. A central role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. FASEB J. 2004;18:1450–1452. [PubMed]
7. Miyamoto K, Khosrof S, Bursell SE, Rohan R, Murata T, Clermont AC, Aiello LP, Ogura Y, Adamis AP. Prevention of leukostasis and vascular leakage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic retinopathy via intercellular adhesion molecule-1 inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999;96:10836–10841. [PubMed]
8. Gotoh R, Suzuki J, Kosuge H, Kakuta T, Sakamoto S, Yoshida M, Isobe M. E-selectin blockade decreases adventitial inflammation and attenuates intimal hyperplasia in rat carotid arteries after balloon injury. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004;24:2063–2068. [PubMed]
9. Barouch FC, Miyamoto K, Allport JR, Fujita K, Bursell SE, Aiello LP, Luscinskas FW, Adamis AP. Integrin-mediated neutrophil adhesion and retinal leukostasis in diabetes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000;41:1153–1158. [PubMed]
10. Baez S. An open cremaster muscle preparation for the study of blood vessels by in vivo microscopy. Microvasc. Res. 1973;5:384–394. [PubMed]
11. Conway RS, Factor SM, Sonnenblick EH, Baez S. Microvascular reactivity of the myopathic Syrian hamster cremaster muscle. Cardiovasc. Res. 1987;21:796–803. [PubMed]
12. Nishiwaki H, Ogura Y, Kimura H, Kiryu J, Honda Y. Quantitative evaluation of leukocyte dynamics in retinal microcirculation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1995;36 [PubMed]
13. Nishiwaki H, Ogura Y, Kimura H, Kiryu J, Miyamoto K, Matsuda N. Visualization and quantitative analysis of leukocyte dynamics in retinal microcirculation of rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1996;37 [PubMed]
14. Tsujikawa A, Kiryu J, Nonaka A, Yamashiro K, Nishiwaki H, Honda Y, Ogura Y. Leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in diabetic retina after transient retinal ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2000;279:980–989. [PubMed]
15. McHale JF, Harari OA, Marshall D, Haskard DO. Vascular endothelial cell expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 at the onset of eliciting contact hypersensitivity in mice: evidence for a dominant role of TNF-alpha. J. Immunol. 1999;162:1648–1655. [PubMed]
16. Ivan E, Colovai AI. Human Fc receptors: Critical targets in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and transplant rejections. Human Immunol. 2006;67:479–491. [PubMed]
17. Berry C, Curtis A. Functionalisation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J. Phys. D. 2003;36:R198–R206.
18. Gao X, Yang L, Petros JA, Marshall FF, Simons JW, Nie S. In vivo molecular and cellular imaging with quantum dots. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005;16:63–72. [PubMed]
19. Smith AM, Gao X, Nie S. Quantum dot nanocrystals for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Photochem. Photobiol. 2004;80:377–385. [PubMed]
20. Ballou B, Lagerholm BC, Ernst LA, Bruchez MP, Waggoner AS. Noninvasive imaging of quantum dots in mice. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004;15:79–86. [PubMed]
21. Bentzen EL, Tomlinson ID, Mason J, Gresch P, Warnement MR, Wright D, Sanders-Bush E, Blakely R, Rosenthal SJ. Surface modification to reduce nonspecific binding of quantum dots in live cell assays. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005;16:1488–1494. [PubMed]
22. Dubertret B, Skourides P, Norris DJ, Noireaux V, Brivanlou AH, Libchaber A. In vivo imaging of quantum dots encapsulated in phospholipid micelles. Science. 2002;298:1759–1762. [PubMed]
23. Akerman ME, Chan WC, Laakkonen P, Bhatia SN, Ruoslahti E. Nanocrystal targeting in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:12617–12621. [PubMed]
24. Gao XH, Cui YY, Levenson RM, Chung LWK, Nie SM. In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004;22:969–976. [PubMed]
25. Russ PK, Gaylord GM, Haselton FR. Retinal vascular permeability determined by dual-tracer fluorescence angiography. Ann Biomed. Eng. 2001;29:638–647. [PubMed]
26. Gotoh S, Itoh M, Fujii Y, Arai S, Sendo F. Enhancement of the expression of a rat neutrophil-specific cell-surface antigen by activation with phorbol-myristate acetate and concanavalin-A. J. Immunol. 1986;137:643–650. [PubMed]
27. Karyakin AA, Presnova GV, Rubtsova MY, Egorov AM. Oriented immobilization of antibodies onto the gold surfaces via their native thiol groups. Anal. Chem. 2000;72:3805–3811. [PubMed]
28. Yoshitake S, Yamada Y, Ishikawa E, Masseyeff R. Conjugation of glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger and rabbit antibodies using N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of N-(4-carboxycyclohexylmethyl)-maleimide. Eur. J. Biochem. 1979;101:395–399. [PubMed]
29. Li W, Chung SC. Flow cytometric evaluation of leukocyte function in rat whole blood. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2003;39:413–419. [PubMed]
30. Barouch FC, Miyamoto K, Allport JR, Fujita K, Bursell SE, Aiello LP, Luscinskas FW, Adamis AP. Integrin-mediated neutrophil adhesion and retinal leukostasis in diabetes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000;41:1153–1158. [PubMed]
31. Romer LH, McLean NV, Yan HC, Daise M, Sun J, DeLisser HM. IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha induce redistribution of PECAM-1 (CD31) on human endothelial cells. J. Immunol. 1995;154:6582–6592. [PubMed]
32. Zou Y, Yoon S, Jung KJ, Kim CH, Son TG, Kim MS, Kim YJ, Lee J, Yu BP, Chung HY. Upregulation of aortic adhesion molecules during aging. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med Sci. 2006;61:232–244. [PubMed]
33. Pan LF, Kreisle RA, Shi YD. Detection of Fcgamma receptors on human endothelial cells stimulated with cytokines tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1998;112:533–538. [PubMed]
34. Llodra J, Angeli V, Liu JH, Trogan E, Fisher EA, Randolph GJ. Emigration of monocyte-derived cells from atherosclerotic lesions characterizes regressive, but not progressive, plaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:11779–11784. [PubMed]
35. Flano E, Husain SM, Sample JT, Woodland DL, Blackman MA. Latent murine gamma-herpesvirus infection is established in activated B cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. J. Immunol. 2000;165:1074–1081. [PubMed]
36. Woof JM. The human IgA-Fc alpha receptor interaction and its blockade by streptococcal IgA-binding proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2002;30:491–494. [PubMed]
37. Lin XQ, Lubinski JA, Friedman HM. Immunization strategies to block the herpes simplex virus type 1 immunoglobulin G Fc receptor. J. Virol. 2004;78:2562–2571. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Chapman AP. PEGylated antibodies and antibody fragments for improved therapy: a review. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2002;54:531–545. [PubMed]
39. Filpula D. Antibody engineering and modification technologies. Biomol. Eng. 2007;24:201–215. [PubMed]
40. Meleth AD, Agron E, Chan CC, Reed GF, Arora K, Byrnes G, Csaky KG, Ferris FL, Chew EY. Serum inflammatory markers in diabetic retinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46:4295–4301. [PubMed]
41. Ludwig R, Kretschmer M, Caspar G, Bojunga J, Oldenburg A, Schumm-Draeger P, Stegmuller M, Von Minckwitz G, Usadel KH, Kusterer K. In vivo microscopy of murine islets of Langerhans: increased adhesion of transferred lymphocytes to islets depends on macrophage-derived cytokines in a model of organ-specific insulitis. Immunology. 1999;98:111–115. [PubMed]
42. Rosenbaum JT, McDevitt HO, Guss RB, Egbert PR. Endotoxin-induced uveitis in rats as a model for human disease. Nature (London) 1980;286:611–613. [PubMed]
43. Hossain P. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and fundus fluorescent leucocyte angiography. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1999;83:1250–1253. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Kimura H, Kiryu J, Nishiwaki H, Ogura Y. A new fluorescent imaging procedure in vivo for evaluation of the retinal microcirculation in rats. Curr. Eye Res. 1995;14:223–228. [PubMed]