PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of wjgLink to Publisher's site
 
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 April 14; 16(14): 1804–1807.
Published online 2010 April 14. doi:  10.3748/wjg.v16.i14.1804
PMCID: PMC2852833

Intestinal anisakiasis can cause intussusception in adults: An extremely rare condition

Abstract

We report an extremely rare case of adult intussusception caused by anisakiasis. A 41-year-old man was admitted into our hospital for right lower abdominal colicky pain. Ultrasonography and computed tomography revealed the presence of intussusception. As pneumo-dynamic resolution by colonoscopy failed, surgery was performed. The anisakis body was found in the submucosal layer of the resection specimen. The patient was discharged 9 d after the operation. Anisakiasis may cause intussusception in any country where sushi or sashimi now exists as a popular food. If suspicious, detailed clinical interview as to food intake prior to symptom development is crucial.

Keywords: Anisakis, Intussusception, Eosinophilic granuloma, Multiplanar reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

New food culture may bring a new cause of disease. The culture of eating raw fish, such as sushi and sashimi, has been spreading worldwide and now exists in the United States, European and Asian countries. This may provide the possibility of accidentally contracting anisakiasis, a parasitic disease. We report an extremely rare case of adult intussusception caused by anisakiasis.

CASE REPORT

A 41-year-old man was admitted into our hospital for right lower abdominal colicky pain that had abruptly occurred at midnight of the day before, and which had gradually worsened.

Physical examination revealed a 5 cm-sized, hard and non-mobile mass with extreme tenderness in his right middle abdomen. Ultrasonography (US) showed multiple concentric ring signs and hay-fork signs. Thus, he was diagnosed as having intussusceptions. Abdominal X-ray revealed null colon gas but feces in the right lower abdomen. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed invaginations of the ascending colon (Figure (Figure1),1), the wall of which looked highly edematous. As the ascending colon was obstructed by these invaginations, the colonic lumen was filled with stool at the oral side of this obstruction. No solid tumor was detected at the top of these invaginations and the colonic wall was well enhanced, indicating no ischemic change existed.

Figure 1
Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging. The coronal multiplanar reconstruction imaging in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT clearly reveals the invaginations of the ascending colon itself (arrows).

First of all, we performed colonoscopy an hour after admission, hoping for both differential diagnosis of intussusceptions and pneumo-dynamic resolution. The leading top of the invaginations was yellowish, edematous and tensioned. No tumor was discernible. As pneumo-dynamic resolution of the intussusceptions by colonoscopy was not achieved, open surgery was performed 3 h after admission.

Normograde invaginations of the ascending colon were demonstrated during the operation. The ascending colonic wall was edematously swollen and showed no apparent ischemic change. Since the manipulative resolution of the invaginations was impossible, ileocecal resection was performed.

The resection specimen contained a 4 cm-sized yellowish inflammatory mass (Figure (Figure2)2) at the leading top of these invaginations. The mass was edematous, well tensioned and the mucosal surface that surrounded the mass was normal.

Figure 2
A gross view of the resection specimen. The extirpated mass is 4 cm in diameter and its surface is smooth, yellowish, edematous and slightly soft (arrow).

We pathologically demonstrated the body of anisakis in the midst of eosinophilic granuloma in the submucosal layer (Figure (Figure3).3). Marked inflammation and edema in the submucosal layer formed an inflammatory mass.

Figure 3
Histopathological findings of the resection specimen. An anisakis body (arrow) is demonstrated in the edematously inflamed submucosa of the extirpated ascending colon (hematoxylin and eosin stain; × 20). Note that many eosinophils and lymphocytes ...

A retrospective clinical interview was performed where the patient told us that he had eaten marinated mackerel 2 d before admission. A retrospective analysis of his serum revealed that an anti-anisakis antibody test was positive. Based on these findings, we finally diagnosed this case as intussusceptions of the ascending colon caused by anisakiasis.

The patient’s abdominal pain immediately disappeared after surgery. He clinically recovered well and was discharged 9 d after the operation.

DISCUSSION

Adult intussusception (AI) occurs much less often than in children and accounts for only 5% to 10% of all intussusceptions[1]. More than 90% of AI derive from tumorous lesions[1], 60% of which are malignant and the remaining 40% are benign tumors[2]. Thus, almost all surgeons agree that operation is strongly recommended as a treatment for AI because of the high incidence of malignancy[1].

US[3-5] and CT are very useful for diagnosis of AI. There are specific US findings named as “multi concentric ring sign”[4], “target ring sign”[3], or “hay-fork sign”[5]. However, these signs are often hard to determine, being masked by a fully gas-filled bowel[6].

CT is the best modality to diagnose AI, visualizing “target signs”, or “bowel-within-bowel” appearances[7]. The location or nature of tumors if present, soft tissues involved in the invaginations, obstruction and threatening signs of bowel viability, can all be evaluated by CT[7]. Recently, multiplanar reconstruction (MRP) imaging by the multi-detector row CT has been developed and is more useful for diagnosing intussusceptions than other imaging examinations[8].

Most surgeons agree that surgery is preferable as a treatment for AI because of the high frequency of malignancy[1,2,9]. The resolution of intussusceptions has some risks, such as (1) intraluminal seeding and dissemination, (2) perforation and peritoneal dissemination and (3) anastomotic complication with edematous and fragile bowel wall[1,2,9,10].

Anisakiasis is one of the parasitic diseases and is regarded as larva migrans of Anisakis[11]. A person is accidentally infected by eating raw or uncooked fish containing the parasites. The larva of Anisakis penetrates into the mucosa of the digestive tract and causes anisakiasis[12]. The preferential location of anisakiasis in Japan is the stomach (96%) rather than the intestine (4%)[13]. On the other hand, Van Thiel et al[14] and Smith et al[15] reported that intestine was more frequent than stomach in European countries. The symptoms of intestinal anisakiasis are non-specific, sometimes colicky and diffuse abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting[12]. Patients are often misdiagnosed as having acute appendicitis or terminal ileitis[12]. Clinical symptoms appear within 48 h after food intake, continue for 1 to 5 d and spontaneously recover[16]. Our case had an operation since the conservative therapy was not effective in the resolution of intussusception.

AI caused by anisakiasis is extremely rare. There have previously been two English and nine Japanese reports about AI caused by anisakiasis (Table (Table11)[17-27]. All cases ate raw or marinated fish from half a day to 7 d before the symptom onset. Colon and jejunum were usually involved. The common symptom was abdominal tenderness, although with no palpable mass in jejunum cases. Since the ascending colon is fixed in the retroperitoneum and exists near the abdominal wall, we can physically detect a mass at ease. On the other hand, jejunum, transverse colon and sigmoid colon are not fixed and not necessarily near to the abdominal wall, so it is usually hard to detect a mass. Pneumo-dynamic resolution of AI by colonoscopy was successful in two of the twelve cases in whom emergency operation could be avoided. Correct diagnosis could be preoperatively made in only one of these two by a detailed clinical interview. Ten of the twelve cases had eosinophilic granuloma. Thus, it has been shown from the literature that if raw fish intake is not discovered at interview, or incidental detection of anisakis body fails, it is hard to determine what caused intussusception prior to surgery. That is the reason why surgery was indicated in almost all cases. Therefore, AI is, in general, a good indication for operation although we do not know what would happen if surgery was not performed.

Table 1
Characteristics of affected patients in English and Japanese literature

We would like to draw attention to the risk of anisakiasis since it may occur in Japanese, Chinese and European countries and also the United States of America where sushi or sashimi is now prevailing as a popular cuisine. Thus, we believe that if suspicious, detailed clinical interview as to food intake prior to symptom development is crucial.

Footnotes

Peer reviewers: Misha Luyer, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Orbis Medical Centre, Postbus 5500, Sittard, 6130 MB, The Netherlands; Gabor Veres, MD, Assistant Professor, First Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis Medical University, Bókay street. 53, Budapest 1083, Hungary

S- Editor Tian L L- Editor Logan S E- Editor Ma WH

References

1. Weilbaecher D, Bolin JA, Hearn D, Ogden W 2nd. Intussusception in adults. Review of 160 cases. Am J Surg. 1971;121:531–535. [PubMed]
2. Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM. The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Am J Surg. 1997;173:88–94. [PubMed]
3. Weissberg DL, Scheible W, Leopold GR. Ultrasonographic appearance of adult intussusception. Radiology. 1977;124:791–792. [PubMed]
4. Holt S, Samuel E. Multiple concentric ring sign in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of intussusception. Gastrointest Radiol. 1978;3:307–309. [PubMed]
5. Alessi V, Salerno G. The "hay-fork" sign in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of intussusception. Gastrointest Radiol. 1985;10:177–179. [PubMed]
6. Erkan N, Haciyanli M, Yildirim M, Sayhan H, Vardar E, Polat AF. Intussusception in adults: an unusual and challenging condition for surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:452–456. [PubMed]
7. Beattie GC, Peters RT, Guy S, Mendelson RM. Computed tomography in the assessment of suspected large bowel obstruction. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:160–165. [PubMed]
8. Siddiqi AJ, Arafat O, Nikolaidis P, Yaghmai V. MDCT diagnosis of ileocolic intussusception secondary to an appendiceal mucocele: value of multiplanar reformation. Emerg Radiol. 2007;13:273–275. [PubMed]
9. Eisen LK, Cunningham JD, Aufses AH Jr. Intussusception in adults: institutional review. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:390–395. [PubMed]
10. Marinis A, Yiallourou A, Samanides L, Dafnios N, Anastasopoulos G, Vassiliou I, Theodosopoulos T. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:407–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. van Thiel PH, van Houten H. [The herring worm Anisakis marina as a human parasite outside the wall of the gastrointestinal tract] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1966;110:1524–1528. [PubMed]
12. Sakanari JA, McKerrow JH. Anisakiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989;2:278–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Ishikura H, Kikuchi K, Nagasawa K, Ooiwa T, Takamiya H, Sato N, Sugane K. Anisakidae and anisakidosis. Prog Clin Parasitol. 1993;3:43–102. [PubMed]
14. Van Thiel PH. The present state of anisakiasis and its causative worms. Trop Geogr Med. 1976;28:75–85. [PubMed]
15. Smith JW, Wootten R. Anisakis and anisakiasis. Adv Parasitol. 1978;16:93–163. [PubMed]
16. Hayasaka H, Ishikura H, Takayama T. Acute regional ileitis due to anisakis larvae. Int Surg. 1971;55:8–14. [PubMed]
17. Chikamori F, Kuniyoshi N, Takase Y. Intussusception due to intestinal anisakiasis: a case report. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:39–41. [PubMed]
18. Kanisawa Y, Kawanishi N, Hisai H, Araya H. Colonic anisakiasis: an unusual cause of intussusception. Endoscopy. 2000;32:S55. [PubMed]
19. Hayashi N, Furukawa M, Nakata T, Kusano T, Lin Y, Tashiro K, Watabe S, Suga K, Miyazaki K, Fujii H. A case of intestinal anisakiasis associated with intussusceptions of the small intestine (in Japanese) Iryo. 1989;43:753–756.
20. Kim J, Mitsui T, Asada Y. A case report of parasitic eosinophilic granuloma of the ileocecal valve causing intussusception (in Japanese) J Clin Surg. 1990;45:1825–1828.
21. Mitani M, Sugiura M, Kondoh K. A case of intussusception caused by anisakiasis of the sigmoid colon (in Japanese) J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1994;55:2841–2844.
22. Iwakami S, Kawakami K, Kawaura Y. A case of intussusception caused by anisakiasis of small intestine (in Japanese) Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 1995;28:2037–2041.
23. Hirano S, Anami Y. A case of intussusception caused by anisakiasis of the small intestine (in Japanese) J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1998;59:408–411.
24. Sugiyama S, Tanigawa T. A case of anisakiasis of the colon causing intussusception (in Japanese) J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2000;61:714–717.
25. Hamanaka K, Sodeyama H, Takahashi K, Nishio A, Nakata S, Onuma H. A case of intussusception caused by anisakiasis of the ileocecal resion (in Japanese) J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2001;62:1668–1671.
26. Tsuji K, Ikeda H, Mitani H, Saito M, Ando T, Hirakawa E. A case of small intestinal intussusception caused by anisakidosis (in Japanese) Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2003;36:422–426.
27. Hibi Y, Ogata J, Mimuro A, Ito K, Hakamada Y. A case of small intestinal intussusception caused by anisakidosis (in Japanese) Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 2009;42:669–673.

Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc