PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Chem Commun (Camb). Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 8.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2851162
NIHMSID: NIHMS184636

Enantioselective Iridium Catalyzed Carbonyl Allylation from the Alcohol Oxidation Level via Transfer Hydrogenation: Minimizing Pre-Activation for Synthetic Efficiency

Abstract

Existing methods for enantioselective carbonyl allylation, crotylation and tert-prenylation require stoichiometric generation of pre-metallated nucleophiles and often employ stoichiometric chiral modifiers. Under the conditions of transfer hydrogenation employing an ortho-cyclometallated iridium C,O-benzoate catalyst, enantioselective carbonyl allylations, crotylations and tert-prenylations are achieved in the absence of stoichiometric metallic reagents or stoichiometric chiral modifiers. Moreover, under transfer hydrogenation conditions, primary alcohols function dually as hydrogen donors and aldehyde precursors, enabling enantioselective carbonyl addition directly from the alcohol oxidation level.

1. Introduction: Significance of Hydrogenation

Because organic compounds are composed of carbon and hydrogen, the formation of C-C bonds under hydrogenation conditions is a natural endpoint in the evolution of strategies for the construction of carbon-containing molecules. Catalytic hydrogenation meets all criteria of synthetic efficiency set by the principles of atom-economy,1 step-economy,2,3 and Green Chemistry.4 Hydrogen constitutes roughly 90% of the atoms present in the Universe, and with the advent of efficient catalysts for water-splitting, elemental hydrogen will become even more abundant.5 Catalytic hydrogenations are completely atom economic processes and the volatility of hydrogen trivializes its separation from other materials, virtually eliminating any waste stream. Catalytic hydrogenations such as the Haber-Bosch process,6 the Fischer-Tropsch reaction,7 alkene hydroformylation8,9 and enantioselective hydrogenation10 have improved our quality of life and are responsible for sustaining a large segment of the human population.

Presently, highly stereoselective variants of diverse carbonyl addition reactions are known, yet very few of these processes fulfill the aforementioned criteria of synthetic efficiency. This is especially true for carbonyl additions invovling “non-stabilized carbanions”, which typically require stoichiometric quantities of pre-metallated nucleophilic reagents. However, just as classical carbanion chemistry is broad, so is the potential to create carbanion equivalents via hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation. Indeed, the Grignard reaction and the catalytic hydrogenations developed by Sabatier are both reductive transformations, already suggesting a union between carbonyl addition chemistry and catalytic hydrogenation. Yet the emergence of alkene hydroformylation in 1938 failed to stimulate systematic efforts toward related hydrogen-mediated C-C coupling processes. Reports of C-C bond forming hydrogenations beyond alkene hydroformylation were virtually absent until recent investigations from our laboratory established the progression from hydroformylation to the reductive C-C coupling of diverse unsaturates under hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation conditions and, finally, to isohypsic11 C-C couplings of alcohols and unsaturates where the redistribution of hydrogen embedded within reactants is accompanied by C-C bond formation (Scheme 1).12,13,14,15

Scheme 1
Catalytic C-C coupling in the absence of stoichiometric byproducts via hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation.

In this feature article, we describe how the union of hydrogenation and carbonyl addition chemistry has evoked a new suite of catalytic methods for enantioselective carbonyl allylation. Unlike classical methods for carbonyl allylation, the hydrogen-mediated variants occur in the absence of stoichiometric allylmetal reagents, minimizing or entirely excluding generation of stoichiometric byproducts. Additionally, under transfer hydrogenation conditions, primary alcohols serve dually as hydrogen donors and aldehyde precursors, enabling carbonyl addition directly from the alcohol oxidation level, which circumvents redox manipulations required for discrete generation of aldehyde electrophiles. These protocols are among the first methods available for direct catalytic C–H functionalization of alcohols at the carbinol position.12d,e,16,17

2. Beyond Pre-Activation: Nucleophile-Electrophile Pairs via Transfer Hydrogenation

Classical protocols for carbonyl addition involving delivery of “non-stabilized carbanion equivalents” generally exploit pre-metallated nucleophiles. Such stoichiometric organometallic reagents mandate generation of stoichiometric byproducts in the form of metal salts. Additionally, considerable “pre-activation” in the form of redox manipulations (i.e. oxidative and reductive pre-activation)3 and isohypsic functional group interconversions (e.g. transmetallations) often attend their use. For example, the Oppolzer-Wipf method for enantioselective carbonyl vinylations require alkyne hydrozirconation (mediated by Cp2ZrHCl) with subsequent transmetallation to zinc (mediated by ZnMe2).18,19 Here, four stoichiometric organometallics are employed in advance of C-C coupling, not including reagents used for preparation of Cp2ZrHCl and ZnMe2. A second example of direct relevance to the topic of this review involves Brown’s protocol for the crotylation of carbonyl compounds employing (E)- or (Z)-crotyldiisopinocampheylborane.20 The Brown reagent is prepared through the potassiation of butene employing Schlosser’s base21 followed by transmetallation to boron. Here, multiple manipulations and stoichiometric reagents (n-BuLi, KC4H7, Ipc2BOMe) are required to prepare the desired crotylborane. Furthermore, for each crotyl moiety that is transferred, two equivalents of isopinocampheol are generated, meaning that the product, a secondary alcohol, must be separated from super-stoichiometric quantities of secondary alcohol byproduct (Scheme 2).22

Scheme 2
Pre-activation attends the use of established protocols for carbonyl additions involving non-stabilized carbanions, whereas transfer hydrogenation enables byproduct-free carbonyl addition in the absence of multi-step pre-activation.

We have shown that the redistribution of hydrogen between alcohols and π-unsaturated reactants can result in the generation of nucleophile-electrophile pairs.12d,e By exploiting “unactivated” reactants as redox pairs, pre-activation of the nucleophile and discrete generation of the electrophile are no longer required. Carbonyl addition is achieved directly from the alcohol oxidation level, simply by shuffling hydrogen between alcohols and unsaturates. Because stoichiometric organometallic reagents and transmetallation steps are avoided, molar equivalents of stoichiometric byproducts are not generated. This concept is applicable to diverse carbonyl addition reactions, including the aforementioned carbonyl vinylations and allylations. Such C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenations are inherently step-economic and redox-economic, as they dispense with discrete redox manipulations associated with nucleophilic and electrophilic pre-activation (Scheme 2).

3. Enantioselective Carbonyl Allylation, Crotylation and Reverse Prenylation from the Alcohol Oxidation Level

Enantioselective carbonyl allylation ranks among the most broadly utilized methods in asymmetric synthesis.23 One major approach to asymmetric carbonyl allylation involves the use of chirally modified allyl metal reagents.24 Additionally, chiral Lewis acids and chiral Lewis bases catalyze enantioselective carbonyl allylation employing achiral allylmetal reagents. 25 Other methods for catalytic carbonyl allylation include the reductive coupling of allylic alcohols and allylic carboxylates to aldehydes.26,27 With the exception of ruthenium-based catalysts,26k–m these methods invariably require stoichiometric quantities of metallic reductants for catalytic turnover. Finally, enantioselective carbonyl allylation and crotylation may be achieved using asymmetric variants of the Nozaki-Hiyama reaction.28,29

We have found that cyclometallated iridium C,O-benzoates modified by chiral phosphine ligands are effective catalysts for the enantioselective reductive coupling of allylic acetates and allenes to carbonyl electrophiles to furnish products of carbonyl allylation,30 a,b,e,f,g crotylation29c,h and reverse prenylation.30d,f,h Unlike preexisting methods that exploit stoichiometric metallic reagents or reductants, the carbonyl allylation processes we report employ 2-propanol as terminal reductant in combination with non-metallic allyl donors, for example, allyl acetate, α-methyl allyl acetate and 1,1-dimethylallene. Of even greater significance, alcohols may serve dually as reductant and precursor to the carbonyl electrophile, enabling enantioselective carbonyl addition directly from the alcohol oxidation level. Thus, identical products of asymmetric carbonyl allylation, crotylation and reverse prenylation are generated from alcohols or aldehydes.

Our initial studies focused on allylations mediated by allyl acetate. It was found that under the conditions of transfer hydrogenation employing an iridium catalyst generated in situ from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, the chiral phosphine ligands (R)-BINAP or (R)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP and m-nitrobenzoic acid, allyl acetate couples to allylic alcohols, aliphatic alcohols and benzylic alcohols to furnish products of carbonyl allylation with excellent levels of optical enrichment. The very same set of optically enriched carbonyl allylation products are accessible from enals, aliphatic aldehydes and aryl aldehydes, using iridium catalysts ligated by (−)-TMBTP or (R)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP under identical conditions, but employing 2-propanol as a hydrogen donor (Scheme 3).30a,b

Scheme 3
Enantioselective carbonyl allylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level via iridium catalyzed C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenation.

As corroborated by single crystal X-ray diffraction, the active catalyst is a cyclometallated C,O-benzoate complex, which arises upon ortho-C-H insertion of iridium onto m-nitrobenzoic acid (Fig. 1). The results of isotopic labeling are consistent with intervention of symmetric iridium π-allyl intermediate or rapid interconversion of σ-allyl haptomers through the agency of a symmetric π-allyl. Competition experiments demonstrate rapid and reversible hydrogenation-dehydrogenation of the carbonyl partner in advance of C-C coupling. Although the catalyst readily engages primary alcohols in rapid and reversible hydrogenation-dehydrogenation, the coupling products, which are homo-allylic alcohols, experience almost no erosion of optical purity by way of redox equilibration. This result is even more remarkable in light of the fact that 2-propanol, a secondary alcohol, is oxidized under coupling conditions. As indicated in the proposed catalytic mechanism (Scheme 4), coordination of the homoallylic olefin to the catalyst provides a hexa-coordinate, 18-electron complex that cannot engage in β-hydride elimination due to the absence of an open coordination site. Upon exchange of the homo-allyl alcohol product for a molecule of 2-propanol or a molecule of substrate, for example, cinnamyl alcohol, a penta-coordinate, 16-electron complex arises, which can engage in β-hydride elimination to generate acetone or the transient aldehyde electrophile.

Fig. 1
Enantioselective carbonyl allylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level via iridium catalyzed C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenation.
Scheme 4
Postulated catalytic mechanisms for the iridium catalyzed transfer hydrogenative coupling from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level (chelating bis-phosphine ligand indicated schematically as P-P).

A model accounting for the observed sense of absolute stereoinduction was proposed based on the coordination mode revealed in the crystal structure of the cyclometallated C,O-benzoate complex and the observed trends in substrate scope. Aldehyde binding by the α-allyl haptomer is postulated to occur such that the sterically less demanding allyl moiety is placed between the naphthyl and phenyl moieties of the ligand, allowing the aldehyde to reside in a more open environment. In the favored mode of addition, the aldehydic C–H bond projects into the π-face of a phenyl moiety of the ligand, possibly resulting in a weakly attractive aldehyde C-H-π-interaction,31 and the aldehydic “R-group” projects into an open quadrant, which accounts for the exceptional tolerance of aldehydes possessing methylene, methine and quaternary carbon centers adjacent to the carbonyl moiety. In the disfavored mode of addition, the aldehyde is bound such that the aldehydic “R-group” projects into the π-face of a phenyl moiety of the ligand, resulting in a severe nonbonded interaction (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
Proposed stereochemical model accounting for the observed sense of absolute stereoinduction (chiral ligand = (S)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP).

The ability to perform carbonyl allylation from the alcohol oxidation level enables allylation processes that cannot be performed from the aldehyde oxidation level. For example, whereas malondialdehyde is highly unstable, 1,3-propane diol is highly tractable. Under the conditions of C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenation, 2-substituted 1,3-propane diols and higher 1,n-diols are subject to the successive generation and capture of transient mono-aldehydes to provide C2-symmetric adducts in good yield.30e,f The minor enantiomer of the mono-adduct is transformed to the meso-stereoisomer, which dramatically amplifies the enantioselectivity of the process (Scheme 5).32

Scheme 5
1,n-Glycols as dialdehyde equivalents in iridium catalyzed enantioselective carbonyl allylation from the alcohol oxidation level.

Iterative one-directional and two-directional carbonyl allylations have been performed from the alcohol oxidation level.30e,g, 33 In the latter case, rapid construction of 1,3-polyols is achieved with complete levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity.34 To illustrate the utility of this approach, the 1,3-polyol substructure of the polyene macrolide (+)-roxaticin was prepared in a total of 9 steps from 1,3-propane diol (Scheme 6).35

Scheme 6
Synthesis of the 1,3-polyol substructure of the polyene macrolide (+)-roxaticin involving iterative two-directional carbonyl allylation.

Employing an ortho-cyclometallated iridium catalyst generated in situ from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, 4-cyano-3-nitrobenzoic acid and (S)-SEGPHOS, α-methyl allyl acetate couples to primary aliphatic, allylic and benzylic alcohols with complete levels of branched regioselectivity to furnish products of carbonyl crotylation. Good levels of anti-diastereoselectivity and exceptional levels of enantioselectivity are observed. The same set of products is accessible from the aldehyde oxidation level under identical conditions, but employing 2-propanol as the terminal reductant (Scheme 7).

Scheme 7
Enantioselective carbonyl crotylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level via iridium catalyzed C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenation.

Given the uniformly high levels of selectivity observed using the ortho-cyclometallated iridium C,O-benzoate as catalyst, an effort was made to extend the allylation methodology beyond the use of allylic acetates. Allenes and dienes, which are subject to hydrometallation by iridium hydride intermediates, represent an alternative source of nucleophilic iridium allyls.36 Indeed, employing the cyclometallated iridium C,O-benzoate derived from allyl acetate, m-nitrobenzoic acid and (S)-SEGPHOS as catalyst, 1,1-dimethylallene participates in 2-propanol mediated reductive coupling to aromatic, α,β-unsaturated and aliphatic aldehydes to furnish products of reverse prenylation in good to excellent isolated yields and enantioselectivities. Enantioselective carbonyl reverse prenylation is achieved directly from the alcohol oxidation level in the absence of 2-propanol to provide an equivalent set of adducts with comparable yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 8).

Scheme 8
Enantioselective carbonyl crotylation from the alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level via iridium catalyzed C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenation.

With new methods for carbonyl allylation, crotylation and reverse prenylation in hand, suitable applications toward the total synthesis of polyketide natural products were sought. Given the longstanding challenges associated with defining concise routes to the bryostatins,37 this class of natural products was deemed an ideal vehicle to benchmark the utility of C-C bond forming hydrogenations and transfer hydrogenations developed in our laboratory. In prior work, enantioselective hydrogen-mediated alkyne-carbonyl reductive coupling was applied to construction of the bryostatin C-ring.38 Using two different C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenations, the double asymmetric carbonyl allylation of 1,3-propane diol and a subsequent catalyst-directed reverse prenylation, the synthesis of a known bryostatin A-ring fragment was achieved in less than half the steps previously required (Scheme 9).30f,37a

Scheme 9
Synthesis of the bryostatin A-ring employing consecutive C-C bond forming transfer hydrogenations.

5. Outlook

Given the current state-of-the-art in Organic Chemistry, the primary scientific challenge associated with complex molecule synthesis is no longer the question of whether a given compound can be prepared. Rather, it is the question of how one can dramatically simplify the syntheses of complex structures such that they better conform to the ideals of synthetic efficiency. Toward this end, processes that dispense with preactivation are highly desirable, as they are inherently step-economic and waste-minimizing. To the extent that a process is selective, the use of protecting groups and directing groups may be avoided, again conferring step-economy. Processes that embody new patterns of reactivity also are highly desirable, as these will open up new functional group interconversions, enabling new synthetic strategies. Ultimately, the transformations that we employ routinely in the academic lab or at the discovery level in the pharmaceutical industry should be directly transferable to the process level.

The nascent modes of reactivity illustrated by the reactions described in this review should serve as the basis for innumerable byproduct-free alcohol-unsaturate and amine-unsaturate coupling processes. And while we have only just begun to realize the potential of this novel reactivity mode, already one must question whether processes that traditionally have employed one or more stoichiometric metallic reagents can now be conducted catalytically under the conditions of hydrogenation or transfer hydrogenation. Many future outcomes can be envisioned. Carbonyl ethylation via ethylene-alcohol C-C coupling of would dispense with the need for diethylzinc, a pyrophoric liquid. Related C-C couplings of α-olefin and alcohols would serve as an alternative to Grignard type additions. Indeed, Grignard additions mediated by hydrogen rather than magnesium, foreshadowed by Grignard and Sabatier’s joint receipt of the 1912 Nobel prize, enter the realm of feasibility.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgment is made to the Robert A. Welch Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Merck, the NIH-NIGMS (RO1-GM69445), and the ACS-GCI, for partial support of the research described in this account. Dr. Oliver Briel of Umicore is thanked for the generous donation of rhodium and iridium salts. Dr. Wataru Kuriyama and Dr. Yasunori Ino of Takasago are thanked for the generous donation of (R) and (S)-SEGPHOS.39

Biographies

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms184636b1.gif

Soo Bong Han

Soo Bong Han was born in Seoul, Korea in 1975. He received a B.S. degree in chemistry from Sogang University (2002) and an M.S. degree from KAIST (2004) under supervision of Professor Suk Bok Chang. After working as a senior researcher at LG Life Sciences, he began doctoral studies under the supervision of Professor Michael J. Krische at the University of Texas at Austin, where he has contributed to the development of numerous hydrogen-mediated C-C bond forming processes, including the work presented in this feature article.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms184636b2.gif

In Su Kim

In Su Kim was born in 1975 in Gapyeong, Republic of Korea. He received B.S. (2001), M.S. (2003), and Ph.D. (2006) degrees from the College of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, where he conducted research under the supervision of Professor Young Hoon Jung. After working as a postdoctoral fellow of the BK21 program funded by the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology, he joined the research group of Professor Michael J. Krische at the University of Texas at Austin as a Korea Research Foundation postdoctoral fellow. In 2009, he was appointed Assistant Professor at the University of Ulsan.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms184636b3.gif

Professor Michael J. Krische obtained a B.S. degree in chemistry from the University of California at Berkeley. After a year abroad as a Fulbright Fellow, he received a Ph.D. at Stanford University with Professor Barry Trost and then engaged in post-doctoral studies with Jean-Marie Lehn at the Université Louis Pasteur. In Fall 1999, Professor Krische joined the faculty at the University of Texas at Austin, where he presently resides as the Robert A. Welch Chair in Science. Professor Krische’s research has led to the development of the first C-C bond forming hydrogenations beyond hydroformylation.

References

1. For reviews, see: Trost BM. Science. 1991;254:1471. [PubMed]
Trost BM. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995;34:259.
2. For reviews, see: Wender PA, Miller BL. Org. Synth. Theor. Appl. 1993;2:27.
Wender PA, Handy S, Wright DL. Chem. Ind. 1997:767.
3. In the course of preparing this review, an excellent monograph on the topic of “redox-economy” was published. The minimization of redox manipulation increases step-economy: Baran PS, Hoffmann RW, Burns NZ. Angew. Chem,. Int. Ed. 2009;48:2854. [PubMed]
4. (a) Sheldon RA. Chem. Ind. 1997:12. (b) Sheldon RA. Green Chem. 2007;9:1273.
5. For recent reviews on the visible light driven splitting of solar energy, see: Eisenberg R. Science. 2009;324:44. [PubMed]
Kudo A, Miseki Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:253. [PubMed]
6. The catalytic hydrogenation of atmospheric nitrogen, accounts for the annual production of over 100,000,000 metric tons of ammonia, which is the limiting nutrient in terrestrial plant growth. The Haber-Bosch process is estimated to sustain one-third of the Earth's population. Approximately half the nitrogen in our bodies is nitrogen fixed through the Haber-Bosch reaction. Nobel Foundation. Nobel Lectures, Chemistry, 1901–1921. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1966.
Smil V. Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2004.
7. (a) Fischer F, Tropsch H. Brennstoff-Chem. 1923;4:276. (b) Fischer F, Tropsch H. Chem. Ber. 1923;56B:2428.
8. Roelen O. Chemische Verwertungsgesellschaft mbH, Oberhausen. German Patent DE. 1944;849:548.Chem. Abstr. 1944;38:5501.
9. The prototypical C-C bond forming hydrogenation, hydroformylation combines basic feedstocks (α-olefins, carbon monoxide and hydrogen) with perfect atom economy and accounts for the production of over 10 million metric tons of aldehyde annually, making it the largest volume application of homogeneous metal catalysis. Frohning CD, Kohlpaintner CW. In: Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds. Cornils B, Herrmann WA, editors. Vol. 1. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH; 1996. pp. 29–104.
van Leeuwen PWNM. Homogeneous Catalysis: Understanding the Art. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2004.
10. The asymmetric hydrogenation of C=X π-bonds (X = O, NR) is estimated to account for over half the chiral drugs manufactured industrially, withstanding physical and enzymatic resolution. Thommen M. Spec. Chem. Mag. 2005;25:26.
(b) Thayer AM. C&E News. 2005;83(36):40. (c) Jäkel C, Paciello R. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:2912. [PubMed]
11. While any balanced chemical equation becomes “redox-neutral,” the term isohypsic refers to reactions that occur with no change in oxidation level at a given site: Hendrickson JB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975;97:5784.
Hendrickson JB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971;93:6847.
12. For selected reviews on C-C bond forming hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation, see: Ngai M-Y, Kong JR, Krische MJ. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:1063. [PubMed]
(b) Skucas E, Ngai M-Y, Komanduri V, Krische MJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007;40:1394. [PubMed] (c) Iida H, Krische MJ. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007;279:77. (d) Shibahara F, Krische MJ. Chem. Lett. 2008;37:1102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] (e) Bower JF, Kim IS, Patman RL, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48:34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Prior to our systematic studies, two isolated reports of hydrogenative C-C coupling were reported in the literature: Molander GA, Hoberg JO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:3123.
Kokubo K, Miura M, Nomura M. Organometallics. 1995;14:4521.
14. Side products of reductive C-C bond formation have been observed in catalytic hydrogenation on rare occasions: Moyes RB, Walker DW, Wells PB, Whan DA, Irvine EA. In: Catalysis and Surface Characterisation (Special Publication) Dines TJ, Rochester CH, Thomson J, editors. Vol. 114. Royal Society of Chemistry; 1992. pp. 207–212.
Bianchini C, Meli A, Peruzzini M, Vizza F, Zanobini F, Frediani P. Organometallics. 1989;8:2080.
15. The alcohol-unsaturate couplings developed in our laboratory provide products of carbonyl addition. In contrast, related hydrogen auto-transfer processes provide products of alcohol substitution through pathways involving oxidation-condensation-reduction using pre-metallated nucleophiles. For recent reviews, see: Guillena G, Ramón DJ, Yus M. Angew. Chem.Int. Ed. 2007;46:2358. [PubMed]
Hamid MHSA, Slatford PA, Williams JMJ. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007;349:1555.
16. Processes that enable direct catalytic C-C functionalization of carbinol C–H bonds are highly uncommon. Rh-catalyzed alcohol-vinylarene C-C coupling has been described. The requirement of BF3 and trends in substrate scope suggest these processes involve alcohol dehydrogenation-reductive Prins addition: Shi L, Tu Y-Q, Wang M, Zhang F-M, Fan C-A, Zhao Y-M, Xia WJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:10836. [PubMed]
Jiang Y-J, Tu Y-Q, Zhang E, Zhang S-Y, Cao K, Shi L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008;350:552.
17. For radical mediated C-C functionalization of carbinol C–H bonds, see: Kamitanaka T, Hikida T, Hayashi S, Kishida N, Matsuda T, Harada T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:8460.
Liu Z-Q, Sun L, Wang J-G, Han J, Zhao YK, Zhou B. Org. Lett. 2009;11 1437 and references cited therein. [PubMed]
18. For enantioselective catalytic addition of vinylzinc reagents to aldehydes, see: Oppolzer W, Radinov RN. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1992;75:170.
(b) Oppolzer W, Radinov RN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:1593. (c) Soai K, Takahashi J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1994;1:1257. (d) Wipf P, Xu W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:5197. (e) Oppolzer W, Radinov RN, De Brabander J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:2607. (f) Wipf P, Ribe S. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:6454. (g) Oppolzer W, Radinov RN, El-Sayed E. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:4766. [PubMed] (h) Dahmen S, Bräse S. Org. Lett. 2001;3:4119. [PubMed] (i) Chen YK, Lurain AE, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:12225. [PubMed] (j) Ji J-X, Qiu L-Q, Yip CW, Chan ASC. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:1589. [PubMed] (k) Lurain AE, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:10677. [PubMed] (l) Jeon S-J, Chen YK, Walsh PJ. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1729. [PubMed] (m) Lauterwasser F, Gall J, Hoefener S, Bräse S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006;348:2068. (n) Jeon S-J, Fisher EL, Carroll PJ, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9618. [PubMed] (o) Salvi L, Jeon S-J, Fisher EL, Carroll PJ, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:16119. [PubMed]
19. For reviews on catalytic enantioselective aldehyde vinylation using organozinc reagents, see: Wipf P, Kendall C. Chem. Eur. J. 2002;8:1778. [PubMed]
Wipf P, Nunes RL. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:1269.
20. (a) Brown HC, Bhat KS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986;108:293. [PubMed] (b) Brown HC, Bhat KS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986;108:5919. [PubMed]
21. (a) Schlosser M, Rauchschwalbe G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978;100:3258. (b) Schlosser M, Stähle M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1980;19:487.
22. As documented below, the stoichiometric generation of isopinocampheol frequently complicates product isolation in the Brown allylation protocol: Ireland RE, Armstrong JD, III, Lebreton J, Meissner RS, Rizzacasa MA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:7152.
(b) Burova SA, McDonald FE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:2495. [PubMed] (c) Ramachandran PV, Prabhudas B, Chandra JS, Reddy MVR. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:6294. [PubMed] (d) White JD, Hansen JD. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:1963. [PubMed] (e) Gao D, O’Doherty GA. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1069. [PubMed] (f) Gao D, O’Doherty GA. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:9932. [PubMed] (g) Liu D, Xue J, Xie Z, Wei L, Zhang X, Li Y. Synlett. 2008:1526.
23. For selected reviews on enantioselective carbonyl allylation and crotylation, see: Hoffmann RW. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1982;21:555.
(b) Yamamoto Y, Asao N. Chem. Rev. 1993;93:2207. (c) Ramachandran PV. Aldrichim. Acta. 2002;35:23. (d) Kennedy JWJ, Hall DG. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003;42:4732. [PubMed] (e) Denmark SE, Fu J. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2763. [PubMed] (f) Yu C-M, Youn J, Jung H-K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2006;27:463. (g) Marek I, Sklute G. Chem. Commun. 2007:1683. [PubMed] (h) Hall DG. Synlett. 2007:1644.
24. For selected examples of chirally modified allyl metal reagents, see: Herold T, Hoffmann RW. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1978;17:768.
(b) Hoffmann RW, Herold T. Chem. Ber. 1981;114:375. (c) Hayashi T, Konishi M, Kumada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982;104:4963. (d) Brown HC, Jadhav PK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983;105:2092. (e) Roush WR, Walts AE, Hoong LK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107:8186. (f) Reetz M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988;60:1607. (g) Short RP, Masamune S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:1892. (h) Corey EJ, Yu C-M, Kim SS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:5495. (i) Seebach D, Beck AK, Imwinkeiried R, Roggo S, Wonnacott A. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1987;70:954. (j) Riediker M, Duthaler RO. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1989;28:494. (k) Panek JS, Yang M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:6594. (l) Kinnaird JWA, Ng PY, Kubota K, Wang X, Leighton JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:7920. [PubMed] (m) Hackman BM, Lombardi PJ, Leighton JL. Org. Lett. 2004;6:4375. [PubMed] (n) Burgos CH, Canales E, Matos K, Soderquist JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:8044. [PubMed]
25. For selected examples of catalytic asymmetric carbonyl allylation employing allylmetal reagents: Furuta K, Mouri M, Yamamoto H. Synlett. 1991:561.
(b) Costa AL, Piazza MG, Tagliavini E, Trombini C, Umani-Ronchi A. J. Am. Chem Soc. 1993;115:7001. (c) Keck GE, Tarbet KH, Geraci LS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:8467. (d) Denmark SE, Coe DM, Pratt NE, Griedel BD. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:6161. (e) Denmark SE, Fu J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:9488. [PubMed]
26. For selected examples of carbonyl allylations employing nucleophilic π-allyls derived from allylic acetates and carboxylates, see: Palladium: (a) Tabuchi T, Inanaga J, Yamaguchi M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986;27:1195. (b) Takahara JP, Masuyama Y, Kurusu Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:2577. (c) Kimura M, Ogawa Y, Shimizu M, Sueishi M, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:6903. (d) Kimura M, Tomizawa T, Horino Y, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:3627. (e) Kimura M, Shimizu M, Shibata K, Tazoe M, Tamaru Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003;42:3392. [PubMed] (f) Zanoni G, Gladiali S, Marchetti A, Piccinini P, Tredici I, Vidari G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004;43:846. [PubMed] (g) Kimura M, Shimizu M, Tanaka S, Tamaru Y. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:3709. (h) Howell GP, Minnaard AJ, Feringa BL. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006;4:1278. (i) Barczak NT, Grote RE, Jarvo ER. Organometallics. 2007;26:4863. Rhodium: (j) Masuyama Y, Kaneko Y, Kurusu Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:8969. Ruthenium: (k) Tsuji Y, Mukai T, Kondo T, Watanabe Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1989;369:C51. (l) Kondo T, Ono H, Satake N, Mitsudo T-a, Watanabe Y. Organometallics. 1995;14:1945. (m) Denmark SE, Nguyen ST. Org. Lett. 2009;11:781. [PubMed] Iridium: (n) Masuyama Y, Chiyo T, Kurusu Y. Synlett. 2005;14:2251. (o) Banerjee M, Roy S. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2006;246:231. (p) Masuyama Y, Marukawa M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:5963.
27. For selected reviews on carbonyl allylation via umpolung of π-allyls, see: Masuyama Y. In: Advances in Metal-Organic Chemistry. Liebeskind LS, editor. Vol. 3. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1994. p. 255.
(b) Tamaru Y. In: Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis. Negishi Ei, de Meijere A., editors. Vol. 2. New York: WILEY; 2002. pp. 1917–1943. (c) Tamaru Y. In: Perspectives in Organopalladium Chemistry for the XXI Century. Tsuji J, editor. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 215–231. (d) Kondo T, Mitsudo T-A. Curr. Org. Chem. 2002;6:1163. (e) Tamaru Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005:2647. (f) Zanoni G, Pontiroli A, Marchetti A, Vidari G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007:3599.
28. For catalytic enantioselective carbonyl allylation and crotylation via Nozaki-Hiyama coupling, see: Bandini M, Cozzi PG, Umani-Ronchi A. Polyhedron. 2000;19:537.
(b) Bandini M, Cozzi PG, Umani-Ronchi A. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:835. (c) Bandini M, Cozzi PG, Umani-Ronchi A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000;39:2327. [PubMed] (d) Inoue M, Suzuki T, Nakada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:1140. [PubMed] (e) Lee J-Y, Miller JJ, Hamilton SS, Sigman MS. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1837. [PubMed] (f) McManus HA, Cozzi PG, Guiry PJ. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006;348:551. (g) Xia G, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:2554. [PubMed] (h) Hargaden GC, Müller-Bunz H, Guiry PJ. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007:4235. (i) Hargaden GC, O’Sullivan TP, Guiry PJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008;6:562. [PubMed]
29. For recent reviews of catalytic Nozaki-Hiyama coupling, see: Avalos M, Babiano R, Cintas P, Jiménez JL, Palacios JC. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999;28:169.
(b) Bandini M, Cozzi PG, Umani-Ronchi A. Chem. Commun. 2002:919. (c) Hargaden GC, Guiry PJ. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007;349:2407.
30. For enantioselective carbonyl allylation, crotylation and reverse prenylation via iridium catalyzed transfer hydrogenation, see: Kim IS, Ngai M-Y, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6340. [PubMed]
(b) Kim IS, Ngai M-Y, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:14891. [PubMed] (c) Kim IS, Han SB, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:2514. [PubMed] (d) Han SB, Kim IS, Han H, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:6916. [PubMed] (e) Lu Y, Kim IS, Hassan A, Del Valle DJ, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48:5018. [PMC free article] [PubMed] (f) Lu Y, Krische MJ. Org. Lett. 2009;11:3108. [PubMed] (g) Hassan A, Lu Y, Krische MJ. Org. Lett. 2009;11:3112. [PubMed] (h) Itoh J, Han SB, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48:6313. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. (a) Gallivan JP, Dougherty DA. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999;96:9459. [PubMed] (b) Tatko CD, Waters ML. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:2028. [PubMed]
32. This mechanism for enantiomeric enrichment is documented by Eliel and Midland: Kogure T, Eliel EL. J. Org. Chem. 1984;49:576.
Midland MM, Gabriel J. J. Org. Chem. 1985;50:1144.
33. For a review on two-directional chain synthesis, see: Poss CS, Schreiber SL. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994;27:9.
34. For selected examples of catalyst directed diastereoselectivity, see: Minami N, Ko SS, Kishi Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982;104:1109.
(b) Ko SY, Lee AWM, Masamune S, Reed LA, III, Sharpless KB, Walker FJ. Science. 1983;220:949. [PubMed] (c) Kobayashi S, Ohtsubo A, Mukaiyama T. Chem. Lett. 1991:831. (d) Hammadi A, Nuzillard JM, Poulin JC, Kagan HB. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1992;3:1247. (e) Doyle MP, Kalinin AV, Ene DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:8837. (f) Trost BM, Calkins TL, Oertelt C, Zambrano J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:1713. (g) Balskus EP, Jacobsen EN. Science. 2007;317:1736. [PubMed] (h) Han SB, Kong JR, Krische MJ. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4133. [PubMed]
35. Kim IS, Hassan A, Krische MJ. Unpublished Results.. For two iterations of this two-directional chain extension, see reference 30e.
36. (a) Skucas E, Bower JF, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:12678. [PubMed] (b) Bower JF, Skucas E, Patman RL, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:15134. [PubMed] (c) Bower JF, Patman RL, Krische MJ. Org. Lett. 2008;10:1033. [PubMed]
37. To date, total syntheses of bryostatin 2, bryostatin 3, bryostatin 7 and bryostatin 16 have been reported by Evans, Yamamura, Masamune and Trost, respectively: Evans DA, Carter PH, Carreira EM, Prunet JA, Charette AB, Lautens M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998;37:2354.
(b) Evans DA, Carter PH, Carreira EM, Charette AB, Prunet JA, Lautens M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:7540. (c) Ohmori K, Ogawa Y, Obitsu T, Ishikawa Y, Nishiyama S, Yamamura S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000;39:2290. [PubMed] (d) Ohmori K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2004;77:875. (e) Kageyama M, Tamura T, Nantz M, Roberts JC, Somfai P, Whritenour DC, Masamune S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:7407. (f) Trost BM, Dong G. Nature. 2008;456:485. [PubMed]
38. Cho C-W, Krische MJ. Org. Lett. 2006;8:891. [PubMed]
39. Saito T, Yokozawa T, Ishizaki T, Moroi T, Sayo N, Miura T, Kumobayashi H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001;343:264.