PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jwhMary Ann Liebert, Inc.Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.JournalsSearchAlerts
Journal of Women's Health
 
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 June; 18(6): 803–811.
PMCID: PMC2851123

Prepregnancy Depressive Mood and Preterm Birth in Black and White Women: Findings from the CARDIA Study

Amelia R. Gavin, Ph.D.,corresponding author1 David H. Chae, Sc.D.,2 Sarah Mustillo, Ph.D.,3 and Catarina I. Kiefe, M.D., Ph.D.4

Abstract

Objectives

We examine associations among race, prepregnancy depressive mood, and preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) in a cohort study of black and white women.

Methods

We tested for mediation of the association between race and preterm birth by prepregnancy depressive mood among 555 women enrolled in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Results

Black women had significantly higher levels of prepregnancy depressive mood (modified CES-D score 13.0 vs. 9.5, t = −4.64, p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, black women had 2.70 times the odds of preterm birth as white women (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41, 5.17). When adding prepregnancy depressive mood to this model, higher depressive mood was associated with greater odds of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR] 1.04; 95% CI 1.01, 1.07), and the effect of black race was attenuated (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.28, 4.77).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that prepregnancy depressive mood may be a risk factor for preterm birth among black and white women.

Introduction

Preterm birth is one of the most persistent and least understood public health concerns in the United States.1 Although the overall infant mortality rate has been declining since 1933, in each year, black women were significantly more likely than white women to deliver preterm infants. In 2005, 18.4% of black singletons compared with 11.7% of white singletons were born before 37 completed weeks of gestation.2 Furthermore, as gestational age decreases, this racial disparity increases. Black infants are almost three times as likely as non-Hispanic white infants to be born before 32 weeks of gestation.3 Disorders related to preterm birth are leading causes of black infant mortality and pose a serious public health concern.4

Possible explanations for black-white differences in preterm birth include racial differences in socioeconomic position, health behaviors, and medical risk factors; however, none of these explanations completely explains the racial difference in preterm birth. For example, studies show that the risk of preterm birth among black women exceeds that of white women with similar educational and social backgrounds, suggesting that socioeconomic position does not entirely account for racial disparities in preterm birth.5 Along these lines, studies also have shown that after controlling for the independent effects of maternal behaviors, such as smoking and substance use, and known medical risk factors, including intrauterine infections and cervical incompetence, race remains a significant predictor of preterm birth.69

An additional factor that may in part explain black-white differences in preterm birth is stress. Stress can refer to both the occurrence of stressful life events or chronic stressors and the subjective response to those stressors by individuals (emotional distress).9,10 Norbeck and Tilden11 posit that emotional distress is meant to capture “negative self-pre-occupying thoughts” and is closely related to and sometimes defined by the better known psychological concepts of anxiety and depression. Stress has been a frequently studied psychological risk factor for preterm birth in general because conditions of the maternal environment have the potential to adversely affect the uterine environment.10,1218 However, research findings are inconclusive about whether prenatal stress contributes to the higher prevalence of preterm birth among black women.1923

Another promising explanation for black-white differences in preterm birth is depressive mood. In the United States, 14.5% of women have a new episode of major depression during pregnancy, and nearly one half of those cases are due to minor depression, a less severe constellation of depressive symptoms.24 With approximately 4 million births per year in the United States, nearly 580,000 women experience depression during pregnancy. Diagnosis and treatment of depression in pregnancy are vital because of sequelae of untreated antenatal depression, which may include adverse consequences well beyond the perinatal period. Despite the prevalence of depression during pregnancy, it is not known if depressive mood has any adverse effect on preterm birth.25 Studies have shown that black women report higher levels of depressive mood compared with non-Hispanic white women.2630 Although findings from a handful of research studies suggest that depressive mood during the prenatal period may be associated with preterm birth,3133 a growing number of studies found no association between antenatal depressive mood and preterm birth.13,19,25,27,3437

Traditional prenatal care has come under scrutiny as an effective means to address maternal conditions.38 This limited period may not offer sufficient time to effectively address the health of women at greatest risk for adverse birth outcomes. In comparison, a life-course perspective suggests that adverse maternal health reflects the childhood origins of morbidity and mortality.39 To date, there are no empirical studies that examine the consequences of depressive mood during the prepregnancy period and its subsequent effect on preterm birth. To address this limitation, we examined the association between prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth in a cohort of black and white women. First, we evaluated whether prepregnancy depressive mood has an independent effect on preterm birth among women in the sample. Second, we examined whether prepregnancy depressive mood mediates the association between race and preterm birth.

Materials and Methods

Sample

We used data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. The design and procedures of the CARDIA Study have been described previously.40 CARDIA began in 1985 as a prospective cohort study designed to examine the factors associated with the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors among young adults. In 1985–1986, the CARDIA Study used a stratified random sampling procedure designed to recruit, at each of four sites, equal numbers of black and white adults, women and men, aged 18–25 and 25–30 years, and those with less and more than 12 years of education. A total of 5115 participants were recruited in 1985 (1480 black women and 1307 white women) from four metropolitan areas. Because items assessing depressive mood were first administered in 1990, the analyses are limited to women who participated in year 0 (1985–1986), year 5 (1990–1991), year 7 (1992–1993), and year 10 (1995–1996) and reported 1 or more singleton births delivered between the year 5 and year 10 examinations.

Measures

Preterm birth

An eligible birth was defined using the following criteria: reporting a live singleton birth at the year 7 or year 10 examination (birth after the examination in year 5 and before the examination in year 10); gestational duration of at least 20 weeks; no presence of maternal toxemia, high blood pressure, or diabetes prior to pregnancy. A total of 555 women had at least 1 eligible birth. Preterm delivery was defined as <37 completed weeks of gestation.

Prepregnancy depressive mood

The 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale was administered during the year 5 examination (1990–1991). The CES-D is used to assess the overall level of depressive mood experienced during the past week.41 We used a modified version of the CES-D scale to assess depressive mood. Previously, researchers have used a modified version of this scale to assess maternal depressive mood during pregnancy.25 Because some symptoms of pregnancy may be indistinguishable from somatic manifestations of depression42 and standard scores for pregnant women were unavailable, four items from the scale (two items that assess fatigue, one that assesses loss of appetite, and one that assesses difficulty sleeping) were excluded. These modified scores (Cronbach's α = 0.87) were proportionally inflated using the equation:

equation M1

so that the scores ranged from 0 to 20.25 In the present study, CES-D scores were modeled as a continuous variable. Our decision to model CES-D scores as continuous seemed warranted because greater statistical power is generated when CES-D scores are operationalized as a continuous variable. Also, depressive mood can be transient or chronic in nature, and the biological mechanisms associated with prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth are speculative, and the critical periods of risk also are uncertain. Thus, a continuous assessment of CES-D scores may capture distinct features that are relevant to preterm birth.

Maternal anthropometric characteristics

Respondents were asked at each examination whether they were currently pregnant or breastfeeding; number of pregnancies, including abortions, miscarriages, and live or stillbirths, since the previous examination; duration of each gestation; and dates of deliveries. Based on the data collected, we defined parity groups in the following manner. Number of previous births (parity) at baseline (year 5) was defined as those who reported none, those who reported 1 birth and those who reported ≥2 births before year 0 (1985–1986) as well as births that occurred between examination year 0 (1985–1986) and examination year 5 (1990–1991). To assess number of births during this period following the assessment of depression, we classified women as uniparous (1 live birth) and multiparous (≥2 live births).

Weight and height measurements were assessed at each examination according to a standardized protocol described previously.43 Prepregnancy weight and height were obtained from measurements reported in examination year 5 (1990–1991). Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) was computed as weight in kilograms divided by height in square meters.44

Sociodemographic factors

To maximize the number of participants in the sample with complete data on educational attainment and family income, we implemented the following procedure. For participants who reported births in only one wave of the study, measures of family income and education reported in the prior wave were used. If that information was not available, measures from the concurrent or following wave were used. For example, when the births were reported in year 7 and socioeconomic data from year 5 were not available, educational attainment and family income reported in year 7 were used; if still not available, those reported in year 10 were used. Educational attainment was categorized as ≤12 years vs. ≥13 years, and family income was categorized as <$25,000, $25,000–$49,999, and ≥$50,000.

Among participants who reported eligible births in just one wave of the study, marital status during that wave was used. If marital status was not available from the same wave where the birth occurred, we assumed marital status remained unchanged. Therefore, we used information on marital status from either the wave prior to the birth or the wave after the birth. Among participants who reported singleton births at both year 7 and year 10 examinations, marital status during year 7 was used, and if not available, year 10 was used. Smoking was measured using the same scheme as marital status. Smoking status was coded in the following manner: nonsmoker, ex-smoker, and current smoker. Additional covariates included age at time of initial examination and race.

Analyses

Univariate analyses revealed that 3 participants had missing data on depressive mood and 1 participant had missing data on smoking status. Participants with missing data on these variables were excluded from all analyses, resulting in a final sample of 555 women.

The unit of analysis was the woman, not the birth. We conducted bivariate tests of association between our predictors and preterm birth using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. We examined whether racial differences in preterm birth could be accounted for by prepregnancy depressive mood using steps outlined by Sobel.45 Logistic regression models were first specified to examine the main effect of race unadjusted and adjusted for sociodemographic covariates. To determine if the association between race and preterm birth was mediated by differences in levels of prepregnancy depressive mood between black and white women, we examined the relation between race and prepregnancy depressive mood. Lastly, we examined if the effect estimate of race when including prepregnancy depressive mood in the model attenuated. We did not include income in multivariate models because of collinearity with education. Adverse health behaviors (e.g., smoking and alcohol use) were also excluded from the final multivariate models to create a parsimonious model.

Results

Black women in our sample had a prevalence of preterm birth that was more than twice that of white women (18.1% vs. 8.5%, χ2 = 11.28, 1 df, p < 0.001). In addition, black women had higher levels of prepregnancy depressive mood compared with white women, as assessed using our modified version of the CES-D (means 13.0 vs. 9.5, t = −4.64, p < 0.001). Additional descriptive characteristics of our sample by race are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.
Demographic, Behavioral, and Clinical Characteristics of Black and White Women Who Had an Eligible Birth: The CARDIA Study (1990–1996)

In Table 2, we present results of bivariate tests between our predictors and preterm birth. In addition to the significant association between race and preterm birth, we found that participants who delivered preterm had higher levels of prepregnancy depressive mood compared with those who did not deliver preterm (mean modified CES-D scores: 12.0 vs. 9.8, t = −2.98, p = 0.004). Women (p < 0.001) who reported ≥2 live births between examination years 5 and 10 were also more likely to deliver preterm compared with women who reported 1 birth only during that period. As expected, we also found that participants with lower levels of educational attainment were disproportionately more likely to have preterm births compared with those with higher educational levels (p = 0.002).

Table 2.
Demographic, Behavioral, and Clinical Characteristics by Preterm Delivery: The CARDIA Study (1990–1996)

Table 3 presents results from models examining mediation of the relation between race and preterm birth by prepregnancy depressive mood. In logistic regression models examining the unadjusted relation between race and preterm birth (Model 1), we found that black women had more than twice the odds of having a preterm birth compared with white women (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41, 3.98). In a linear regression model predicting prepregnancy depressive mood (Model 2), we found that black women had levels of depressive mood that were 3.46 points higher compared with white women (SE = 0.49, p = 0.001). In order to examine if differences in preterm birth could be accounted for by levels of prepregnancy depressive mood, we examined the relation between race and preterm birth, including prepregnancy depressive mood (Model 3). We found that prepregnancy depressive mood was significantly associated with preterm birth (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02, 1.07). In addition, although race was still significantly associated with preterm birth, the OR was attenuated from Model 1 to 2.05 (95% CI 1.21, 3.48). Using Sobel's test of mediation, we found evidence that prepregnancy depressive mood partially mediated the association between race and preterm birth (Sobel test statistic = 2.64, p = 0.008).

Table 3.
Unadjusted Logistic and Linear Regressions Predicting Preterm Birth and Prepregnancy Depressive Mood among Black and White Women Who Reported an Eligible Birth in The CARDIA Study (1990–1996)

We ran parallel models testing mediation of race by prepregnancy depressive mood, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics (Table 4, Models 4–6). Results remained substantively similar. Black women had 2.70 times the odds of having a preterm birth compared with white women (Model 4, 95% CI 1.41, 5.71), and black women had levels of prepregnancy depressive mood that were higher compared with white women (Model 5, beta coefficient (b) = 1.66, SE = 0.88, p = 0.061). When including both race and prepregnancy depressive mood while simultaneously controlling for sociodemographic and anthropometric variables (Model 6), we found that prepregnancy depressive mood was significantly associated with preterm birth (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01, 1.07). In addition, race continued to be associated with preterm birth, but the OR was attenuated to 2.47 (95% CI 1.28, 4.77). Using Sobel's test of mediation, however, there was not statistically significant evidence that prepregnancy depressive mood mediated the association between race and preterm birth (Sobel test statistic = 1.51, p = 0.131).

Table 4.
Logistic and Linear Regressions, Controlling for Sociodemographic Characteristics Predicting Preterm Birth and Prepregnancy Depressive Mood among Black and White Women Who Reported an Eligible Birth in The CARDIA Study (1990–1996)

Despite sample size concerns, we conducted analyses stratified by race, and the analysis revealed (data not shown) that prepregnancy depressive mood was predictive of preterm birth among black women (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 1.12) but not white women (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95, 1.06). However the interaction term between prepregnancy mood and race was not significant (b = 0.047, χ2 = 2.20, 1 df, p = 0.138).

Because the elapsed time between depression assessment and date of delivery differs across respondents and it is unclear how transient the measure of depression is in the study, we constructed a time elapsed variable (measured in years) to account for the time variability inherent in these measures. The models were reran with the time elapsed variable included, and the results of the analyses were unchanged (data not shown but available on request).

Discussion

In our prospective cohort study, we confirmed that black women had significantly more than 2-fold higher odds of delivering prematurely compared with white women. We now add to this knowledge by showing that prepregnancy depressive mood is a risk factor for preterm birth and by showing that higher prepregnancy depressive mood among black women compared with white women may indirectly contribute to the greater odds of preterm birth found among black women. In the unadjusted mediation analyses, we found evidence suggesting that prepregnancy depressive mood mediated the relation between race and preterm birth. Although when adjusting for covariates, we did not find statistical evidence for mediation by prepregnancy depressive mood, we did find that the higher odds of preterm birth among black women were somewhat attenuated by including prepregnancy depressive mood as a covariate. At a minimum, these findings suggest a modest and significant association between prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth; however, there is little evidence to suggest that black-white differences in prepregnancy depressive mood may directly contribute to explanations of black-white differences in preterm birth. Given the length of time between assessment of prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth, however, any significant effects are of great interest.

A novelty of our study was the use of longitudinal data and the availability of measures of depressive mood prior to the prenatal period, helping to protect against arguments that our findings are artifacts of reverse causality. Although previous research has focused on birth outcome disparities as functions of differential exposures to protective and risk factors during pregnancy, our findings suggest that the disparity in preterm birth may be in part a consequence of differential exposure to depressive mood prior to pregnancy.39 Our findings differ from the results of a previous study in which depressive mood prior to the antenatal period was found not to be associated with preterm birth.46 Our findings may be different because the study relied on retrospective reports of depressive mood. Retrospective reports of depressive mood may not accurately assess mood status because current mood status may affect reporting of mood status in previous or subsequent periods.47

Support for our finding that prepregnancy depressive mood may affect the duration of the gestational period is based on biological evidence involving neuroendocrine, immune/inflammatory, and vascular processes. The dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis, commonly caused by hypersecretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), is routinely observed in those with major depression.48,49 CRH, a 41-amino acid neuropeptide, is a major hypothalamic regulator of human responses to stress.50,51 CRH is also present in the human placenta and plays a central role in initiating and coordinating fetal and maternal endocrine events involved in parturition.52,53 Placental CRH is sensitive to stress, and studies suggest that the release of placental CRH is triggered by stress hormones.5456 In addition, elevated levels of placental CRH have been shown to be an independent predictor of preterm birth.5760 Another potential etiological pathway that may explain the link between prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth is the strong association between intrauterine infection and preterm labor and birth.6163 By altering immune functioning, depression may alter host susceptibility to maternal tract infections, resulting in increased risk of preterm labor and birth.32

Although the interaction between race and prepregnancy depressive mood was not significant, we speculate that prepregnancy depressive mood may be a particularly salient risk factor for preterm birth among black women because of the experience of cumulative health disadvantages, or weathering. Lu and Haflon39 argue that black-white differences in preterm birth are related not only to stress exposure during pregnancy but also to the stress response that has been patterned by exposures to chronic and repeated stress across the life-course. One conceptual model that has been put forward is allostatic load. Allostatic load emphasizes the cumulative health risk associated with the wear and tear that occurs across neural, neuroendocrine, and immune systems as a result of chronic exposure to stressors that influence health outcomes over the life-course.64 A complementary framework on cumulative health risk among black women is weathering, which suggests that black women experience accelerated declines in health because of the cumulative effect of repeated experience with socioeconomic and political marginalization and exclusion.65 Empirical evidence supporting the weathering framework showed that an increase in the risk of delivering low and very low birth weight infants was accompanied by increasing age among black women and particularly among those living in low-income communities.66 Additional evidence comes from research on intergenerational birth weight patterns among U.S.-born and foreign-born white and black women. Among descendants of foreign-born white women, there is an intergenerational improvement in birth weights, whereas among descendants of foreign-born black women, the intergenerational trend in birth weights shifts downward. These findings suggest that maternal lifelong minority status or cumulative health risk among black women is associated with infant birth weight.67

Our results must be viewed in the light of several limitations. First, we relied on mothers' reports of gestational age at birth. Verification from clinical records was not available. In epidemiological studies, however, it has been shown that the use of maternal recollection of gestational age is a valid method of obtaining data when clinical verification is unavailable.68 Second, we used a modified version of the CES-D scale to assess prepregnancy depressive mood. Although there is a relatively high prevalence of depressive mood among women of childbearing age, the validity of this 16-item modified CES-D scale, as well as the 20-item CES-D scale, needs further study.32 Third, our assessment of covariates, such as marital status, may limit the generalizability of the findings. Another limitation of this study is the exclusion of potential confounding factors, including rates and frequency of daily exercise, chronic medical conditions, antidepressant use, and racial discrimination. Previous studies have documented the association between these factors and either depression or preterm birth.27,6976 Given these documented associations, future studies should account for these factors when examining the association between prepregnancy depression and preterm birth. An additional line of inquiry may include replication of our study with the inclusion of pregnancy depressive mood to determine if pregnancy depressive mood mediates the association between prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth. In addition, our study is observational; therefore, causal inferences may be suggested but not established with the data at hand. Finally, in light of our small sample size, we may not have been able to detect meaningful effects of some of our predictors. For example, our analyses examining the interaction between race and prepregnancy depressive mood may have been insufficiently powered. Future studies may examine moderated effects of depressive mood by race using larger sample sizes.

Despite these caveats, our study has a number of strengths. To our knowledge, this is the first study that examined the association of prospective reports of prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth. This approach may have allowed us to obtain a clearer picture of the role of depressive mood separate from the stress associated with pregnancy. Second, our sample is drawn from a community-based sample of black and white women rather than from the population of women attending prenatal clinics associated with delivery hospitals. It has been suggested that adopting a cohort study design reduces the bias that can occur in samples drawn from clinics at teaching or referral hospitals.77 Third, we assessed depressive mood prospectively, eliminating problems of recall bias.

Conclusions

Our study highlights the importance of examining prepregnancy depression status with respect to the risk of delivering preterm infants. These findings suggest that although race and prepregnancy depressive mood both independently and negatively affect preterm birth, there is minimum evidence to suggest from these findings that black-white differences in prepregnancy mood in part explain the black-white difference in preterm birth. Future research is needed to determine what other risk factors over the life-course are important in understanding the etiology of preterm birth as well as black-white differences in preterm birth.

Acknowledgments

The CARDIA Study is supported by contracts N01-HC-48047, N01-HC-48048, N01-HC-48049, N01-HC-48050, and N01-HC-95095 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

This publication was made possible by grant 1KL2RR025015-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at www.ncrr.nih.gov/ Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp During manuscript preparation, D.H.C. was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Health and Society Scholars program and was also supported by the W.K. Kellogg Doctoral Fellowship in Health Policy.

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

1. Green N. Damus K. Simpson J, et al. the March of Dimes Scientific Advisory Committee o Prematurity. Research agenda for preterm birth: Recommendations from the March of Dimes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:626–635. [PubMed]
3. Martin JA. Hamilton BE. Sutton PD. Ventura SJ. Menacker F. Kirmeyer S. Births: Final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 Sep 29;55(1) [PubMed]
4. Mathews TJ. MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2004 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007 May 2;55(15) [PubMed]
5. Collins J. Hammond N. Relation of maternal race to risk of preterm non-low birthweight infants: A population study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:333–337. [PubMed]
6. Blackmore-Prince C. Kieke B. Kugaraj K, et al. the NMIHS Collaborative Working Group. Racial differences in the patterns of singleton preterm delivery in the 1988 National Maternal Infant Health Survey. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3:189–197. [PubMed]
7. Schieve LA. Handler A. Preterm delivery and perinatal death among black and white infants in a Chicago-area perinatal registry. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:356–363. [PubMed]
8. Mercer BM. Goldenberg RL. Das A, et al. The preterm prediction study: A clinical risk assessment system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1885–1895. [PubMed]
9. Goldenberg R. Gotlieb S. Social and psychological factors and pregnancy outcome. In: Cherry S, editor; Merkatz I, editor. Complications of pregnancy: Medical, surgical, gynecologic, psychosocial, and perinatal. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1991. pp. 80–96.
10. Hoffman S. Hatch M. Stress, social support and pregnancy outcome: A reassessment based on recent research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1996;10:380–405. [PubMed]
11. Norbeck JS. Tilden VP. Life stress, social support, and emotional disequilibrium in complications of pregnancy: A prospective, multivariate study. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:30–46. [PubMed]
12. Austin M. Leader L. Maternal stress and obstetric and infant outcomes: Epidemiological findings and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;40:331–337. [PubMed]
13. Cooper RL. Goldenberg RL. Das A, et al. the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The preterm prediction study: Maternal stress is associated with spontaneous preterm birth at less than thirty-five weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1286–1292. [PubMed]
14. Hedegaard M. Henriksen T. Sabroe S. Secher N. Psychological distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery. BMJ. 1993;307:234–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Hedegaard M. Henriksen T. Secher N. Hatch M. Sabroe S. Do stressful life events affect duration of gestation and risk of preterm delivery? Epidemiology. 1996;7:339–345. [PubMed]
16. Lobel M. Dunkel-Schetter C. Scrimshaw S. Prenatal maternal stress and prematurity: A prospective study of socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Health Psychol. 1992;11:32–40. [PubMed]
17. Nordentoft M. Lou HC. Hansen D, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation and premature delivery: The influence of maternal smoking and psychosocial factors. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:347–354. [PubMed]
18. Wadhwa P. Sandman C. Porto M. Dunkel-Schetter C. Garite T. The association between prenatal stress and infant birth weight and gestational age at birth: A prospective investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:858–865. [PubMed]
19. Dole N. Savitz DA. Siega-Ruiz A. Hertz-Picciotto I. McMahon M. Buekens P. Psychosocial factors and preterm birth among African American and white women in Central North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1358–1365. [PubMed]
20. Culhane J. Rauh V. McCollum K. Elo I. Hogan V. Exposure to chronic stress and ethnic differences in rates of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1272–1276. [PubMed]
21. Neggers Y. Goldenberg R. Cliver S. Hauth J. The relationship between psychosocial profile, health practices, and pregnancy outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2006;85:277–285. [PubMed]
22. Mackey M. Williams C. Tiller C. Stress, pre-term labour and birth outcomes. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:666–674. [PubMed]
23. Giscombe C. Lobel M. Explaining disproportionately high rates of adverse birth outcomes among African Americans: The impact of stress, racism, and related factors in pregnancy. Psychol Bull. 2005;131:662–683. [PubMed]
24. Gaynes B. Gavin N. Meltzer-Brody S, et al. Perinatal depression: Prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 119. (Prepared by the RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, under Contract No. 290-02-0016.) AHRQ Publication No. 05-E006-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.
25. Hoffman S. Hatch M. Depressive symptomatology during pregnancy: Evidence for an association with decreased fetal growth in pregnancies of lower social class women. Health Psychol. 2000;19:535–543. [PubMed]
26. Bromberger J. Assmann S. Avis N. Schocken M. Kravitz H. Cordal A. Persistent mood symptoms in a multiethnic community cohort of pre- and perimenopausal women. Am J Epidmiol. 2003;158:347–356. [PubMed]
27. Mustillo S. Krieger N. Gunderson E. Sidney S. McCreath H. Kiefe C. Self-reported experiences of racial discrimination and black-white differences in preterm and low-birthweight deliveries: The CARDIA Study. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:2125–2131. [PubMed]
28. McLennan J. Kotelchuck M. Cho H. Persistence, and correlates of depressive mood in a national sample of mothers of toddlers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:1316–1323. [PubMed]
29. Rickert V. Weimann C. Berenson A. Ethnic differences in depressive symptomatology among young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:55–60. [PubMed]
30. Gazmararian J. James S. Lepkowski J. Depression in black and white women: The role of marriage and socioeconomic status. Ann Epidemiol. 1995;5:455–463. [PubMed]
31. Dayan J. Creveuil C. Marks M, et al. Prenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, and spontaneous preterm birth: A prospective cohort study among women with early and regular care. Psychosom Med. 2006;68:938–946. [PubMed]
32. Orr ST. James SA. Blackmore-Prince C. Maternal prenatal depressive mood and spontaneous preterm births among African-American women in Baltimore, Maryland. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:797–802. [PubMed]
33. Steer R. Scholl T. Hediger M. Fischer R. Self-reported depression and negative pregnancy outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1093–1099. [PubMed]
34. Dole N. Savitz D. Hertz-Picciotto I. Siega-Ruiz A. McMahon M. Buekens P. Maternal stress and preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:14–24. [PubMed]
35. Perkin MR. Bland JM. Peacock JL. Anderson HR. The effect of anxiety and depression during pregnancy on obstetric complications. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:629–634. [PubMed]
36. Berle JO. Mykletum A. Daltveit AK. Rasmussen S. Holsten F. Dahl AA. Neonatal outcomes in offspring of women with anxiety and depression during pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8:181–189. [PubMed]
37. Larsson C. Sydsjo G. Josefsson A. Health, sociodemographic data, and pregnancy outcome in women with antepartum depressive symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:459–466. [PubMed]
38. Lu MC. Kotelchuck M. Culhane J. Hobel CJ. Klerman LV. Thorp JM. Preconception care between pregnancies: The content of internatal care. Matern Child Health J. 2006;16:107–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Lu M. Haflon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: A life-course perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2003;7:13–30. [PubMed]
40. Friedman G. Cutter GR. Donahue R, et al. CARDIA: Study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:1105–1116. [PubMed]
41. Radloff L. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:384–401.
42. Huffman L. Lamour M. Bryan Y. Pederson F. Depressive symptomalogy during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Is the Beck Depression Inventory applicable? J Reprod Infant Psychol. 1990;8:87–97.
43. Lewis CE. Smith DE. Wallace DD. Williams OD. Bild DE. Jacobs DR., Jr Seven-year trends in body weight and associations with lifestyle and behavioral characteristics in black and white young adults: The CARDIA Study. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:635–642. [PubMed]
44. The evidence report. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. [PubMed]
45. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhardt S, editor. Sociological methodology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1982. pp. 290–312.
46. Haas J. Fuentes-Afflick E. Stewart AL, et al. Prepregnancy health status and the risk of preterm delivery. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:58–63. [PubMed]
47. Schraedley P. Turner R. Gotlieb I. Stability of retrospective reports of depression: Traumatic events, depressive episodes, and parental psychopathology. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43:307–316. [PubMed]
48. Groenink L. Dirks A. Verdouw P, et al. HPA axis dysregulation in mice overexpressing corticotropin releasing hormone. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51:875–881. [PubMed]
49. Arborelius L. Owens J. Plotsky P. Nemeroff C. The role of corticotropin-releasing factor in depression and anxiety disorders. J Endocrinol. 1999;160:1–12. [PubMed]
50. Chrousos G. Gold P. The concepts of stress and stress system disorders. Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. JAMA. 1992;267:1244–1252. [PubMed]
51. Wang X. Zuckerman B. Kaufman G, et al. Molecular epidemiology of preterm delivery: Methodology and challenges. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:63–77. [PubMed]
52. Wadhwa P. Culhane JF. Rauh V, et al. Stress, infection and preterm birth: A biobehavioural perspective. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:17–29. [PubMed]
53. McLean M. Bisits A. Davies J. Woods R. Lowry P. Smith R. A placental clock controlling the length of human pregnancy. Nat Med. 1995;1:460–463. [PubMed]
54. Wadhwa P. Sandman C. Chicz-DeMet A. Porto M. Placental CRH modulates maternal pituitary-adrenal function in human pregnancy. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1997;814:276–281. [PubMed]
55. Goland R. Conwell I. Warren W. Wardlaw S. Placental corticotropin-releasing hormone and pituitary-adrenal function during pregnancy. Neuroendocrinology. 1992;56:742–749. [PubMed]
56. Petraglia F. Sawchenko P. Rivier J. Vale W. Evidence for local stimulation of ACTH secretion by corticotropin-releasing factor in human placenta. Nature. 1987;328:717–719. [PubMed]
57. Petraglia F. Sutton S. Vale W. Neurotransmitters and peptides modulate the release of immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing factor from cultured human placental cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:247–251. [PubMed]
58. Wadha P. Garite T. Porto M, et al. Placental corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), spontaneous preterm birth, and fetal growth restriction: A prospective investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1063–1069. [PubMed]
59. Holzman C. Jetton J. Siler-Khodr T. Fisher R. Rip T. Second trimester corticotropin-releasing hormone levels in relation to preterm delivery and ethnicity. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:657–663. [PubMed]
60. Wadhwa P. Porto M. Garite T. Chicz-DeMet A. Sandman C. Maternal corticotropin-releasing hormone levels in the early third trimester predict length of gestation in human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1079–1085. [PubMed]
61. Goldenberg R. Hauth J. Andrews W. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1500–1507. [PubMed]
62. Hillier S. Nugent T. Eschenbach D, et al. for the Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low birth-weight infant. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1737–1742. [PubMed]
63. Mitchell D. Branch D. Lundin-Schiller S. Romero R. Daynes R. Dudley D. Immunologic aspects of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol. 1991;15:210–224. [PubMed]
64. McEwen B. Stellar E. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2093–2101. [PubMed]
65. Geronimus AT. Understanding and eliminating racial inequalities in women's health in the United States: The role of the weathering conceptual framework. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2001;56:133–136. [PubMed]
66. Geronimus AT. Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birthweight: A population-based test of the weathering hypothesis. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:589–597. [PubMed]
67. Collins J. Wu S. David R. Differing intergenerational birth weights among the descendants of US-born and foreign-born whites and African Americans in Illinois. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:210–216. [PubMed]
68. Tomeo C. Rich-Edwards J. Michels K, et al. Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiology. 1999;10:774–777. [PubMed]
69. Dunn AL. Trivedi MH. Kampert JB. Clark CG. Chambliss HO. Exercise treatment for depression. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:1–8. [PubMed]
70. Simon G. Von Korff M. Saunders K, et al. Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the U.S. adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:824–830. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Jensen DM. Damm P. Moelsted-Pedersen L, et al. Outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2819–2823. [PubMed]
72. Rosenberg TJ. Garbers S. Lipkind H. Ciasson M. Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1544–1551. [PubMed]
73. Johnson M. Petri M. Witter F. Repke J. Evaluation of preterm delivery in a systemic lupus erythematosus pregnancy clinic. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:396–399. [PubMed]
74. Simon G. Cunningham ML. Davis RL. Outcomes of prenatal antidepressant exposure. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:2055–2061. [PubMed]
75. Simhan HN. Bodnar LM. Prepregnancy body mass index, vaginal inflammation, and the racial disparity in preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:459–466. [PubMed]
76. Schulz A. Gravlee C. Williams D. Israel B. Mentz G. Rowe Z. Discrimination, symptoms of depression, and self-rated health among African American women in Detroit: Results from a longitudinal analysis. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1265–1270. [PubMed]
77. Holzman C. Bullen B. Fisher R. Paneth N. Reuss L. the Prematurity Study Group. Pregnancy outcomes and community health: The POUCH study of preterm delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:136–158. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.