Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of currgenoLink to Publisher's site
Curr Genomics. 2010 March; 11(1): 62–69.
PMCID: PMC2851119

Revolver and Superior: Novel Transposon-Like Gene Families of the Plant Kingdom


High-throughput sequencing of eukaryotic genomes has revived interest in the structure and function of repetitive genomic sequences, previously referred to as junk DNA. Repetitive sequences, including transposable elements, are now believed to play a significant role in genomic differentiation and evolution. Some are also expressed as regulatory noncoding RNAs. Vast DNA databases exist for higher eukaryotes; however, with the exception of homologues of known repetitive-sequence-families and transposable elements, most repetitive elements still need to be annotated. Revolver and Superior, both discovered in the Triticeae, are novel classes of transposon-like genes and major components of large cereal genomes. Revolver was isolated from rye via genome subtraction of sequences common to rye and wheat. Superior was isolated from rye by cleavage with EcoO109I, the recognition sites of which consist of a 5′- PuGGNCCPy-3′ multi-sequence. Revolver is 2929–3041 bp long with an inverted repeat sequence on each end. The Superior family elements are 1292–1432 bp in length, with divergent 5′ regions, indicating the presence of considerable structural diversity. Revolver and Superior are transcriptionally active elements; Revolver harbors a single gene consisting of three exons and two introns, encoding a protein of 139 amino acid residues. Revolver variants range in size from 2665 bp to 4269 bp, with some variants lacking the 5′ region, indicating structural diversity around the first exon. Revolver and Superior are dispersed across all seven chromosomes of rye. Revolver has existed since the diploid progenitor of wheat, and has been amplified or lost in several species during the evolution of the Triticeae. This article reviews the recently discovered Revolver and Superior families of plant transposons, which do not share identity with any known autonomous transposable elements or repetitive elements from any living species.

Keywords: Transposon, gene family, Revolver, Superior, structural diversity, quantitative change, evolution, plant kingdom.


In higher eukaryotes, genes required for cellular function can comprise as little as 20% of the genome [1, 2], and occur in islands separated by repetitive DNA sequences [3, 4]. These repetitive regions comprise >70% of the genomes and are often referred to as junk DNA. With the advent of high-throughput DNA sequencing, it has become apparent that transposable elements constitute a large proportion of the repetitive DNA component of most eukaryote genomes, that is, at least 45% of the human genome [5], and 50–80% of some grass genomes [6, 7]. Advances of eukaryotic genomics have revived interest in the structure and function of repetitive genomic sequences. Amplification and rearrangement of repetitive sequences, including transposable elements, are now believed to play a significant role in genomic differentiation and evolution [8, 9]. Moreover, a substantial proportion of the genome is expressed as regulatory noncoding RNAs, some of which are reconstructed from transposable elements [10-12].

Transposable elements are divided into two major classes according to their mode of transposition [13]. Class I elements can replicate by transcription of the genomic element, followed by reverse transcription of the RNA to generate a cDNA copy, which is then integrated back into the genome [14]. A representative class I element is the long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon, which has both structure and life-cycle similar to elements in retroviruses [15-17]. LTR retrotransposons are ancient and ubiquitous, and are major components of plant genomes [17-21]. They are believed to be significant contributors to plant genome evolution because their replication strategy has the potential to result in an explosive increase in copy number and for insertional genomic change [9, 22].

Class II transposable elements move by excision from one chromosomal location and reintegration elsewhere in the genome. They are distinguished by terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) and are divided into three superfamilies – hAT , CACTA and MULU – on the basis of the homology of the TIRs and the transposase genes carrying out the cut-and-paste process. Transposons are widespread in plants [23, 24], but are generally quite low in copy numbers, ranging from tens to hundreds per genome. However, an analysis of the growing genomic DNA sequences databases has revealed that plant genomes can also harbor up to 30,000 copies of miniature inverted-repeat terminal elements (MITEs), which are classified as class II elements [25]. MITEs, along with LTR retrotransposons, have made important contributions to the evolution of plant genome organization [26, 27].

Widely distributed transposable elements are the most rapidly evolving fraction of the eukaryotic genome [28], because the methylated and heterochromatic state of most highly repetitive elements is more susceptible to sequence change than gene-coding sequences [29, 30]. In general, the genomes of higher eukaryotes contain thousands, even millions, of seemingly inactive transposable elements, which may be a source of interspecific sequence divergence. Species-specific repetitive elements serve as genetic tools for developing DNA markers dispersed throughout the genome [31]. As well as the development of molecular markers, active transposable elements have been significant tools in functional genomics studies. Their incorporation into the host genome enables insertional gene mutagenesis and gene tagging. In rice, for example, the LTR retrotransposon Tos17 is used to generate mutant lines [32]. Class II Ac (hAT) and Mutator (MULU) transposons have also been widely used for gene cloning [33].

Despite the vast DNA databases that exist for higher eukaryotes, most repetitive components of genomes are yet to be identified and annotated; only elements homologous to known repetitive-sequence-family and transposable elements or their derivatives are annotated [34, 35]. Efforts have been made to identify novel active genomic components that might be useful molecular tools. Among the Triticeae tribe, rye (Secale cereale) has been used in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and triticale breeding programs, as a source of genes conferring agronomically important traits such as stress resistance. The rye genome has a 1C DNA content of 3.9 Gb – the highest among the Triticeae – and Cot analysis estimates that 24% of the rye genome is rye-specific [1]. Repetitive sequences comprise 92% of the genome [36], and. rye-specific repetitive sequences have been useful molecular probes for the determination of introgressed genomes and the genomic constitution of wheat–rye hybrids [37, 38]. In the rye genome, dozens of known transposable elements that are classed as Ty1-copia elements [39, 40], Ty3-gypsy elements, LINE elements, SINE elements, CACTA elements, or MITE elements have been registered in the GenBank database ( However, for a long time, active transposable elements were not identified in rye, wheat or wheat relatives. One reason for this may be that repetitive sequences were isolated mainly from relic DNA, which is not susceptible to methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes used to isolate repetitive elements [41-43].

Recently, the first active plant foldback (FB) transposon RYS1 was identified [44]. Two new classes of transposon-like genes, Revolver [45] and Superior [46], have also been identified in rye, from repetitive non-methylated DNA [46, 47]. These novel genomic components of the huge and complex rye genome are distinct from known class I and class II transposable elements, and might be useful as tools for gaining insight into genome structure and evolution in the Triticeae, or for use in molecular breeding programs. The following sections describe the identification and characterization of Revolver and Superior elements.


Novel repetitive DNA elements have been successfully identified through a process of genomic subtraction between wheat and a rye-chromosome wheat addition line to identify rye-specific sequences [47]. The authors used the bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar Chinese spring, and a rye-chromosome Chinese spring wheat addition line, which carries the 6R chromosome from self-fertile rye (Secale cereale L.). Repetitive sequences from wheat have evolved and differentiated by combining units of different repetitive sequences [41, 48-51]. To obtain minimum repetitive-sequence units, the authors of the study digested genomic DNA from the rye chromosome-addition wheat into fragments ≤2 kb using the four-base cutting restriction enzyme MboI. A DNA library was then established, in which the sequences common to wheat were subtracted from the rye-chromosome-addition wheat genome. To achieve this, randomly cleaved genomic DNA from wheat was generated by sonication. This DNA was mixed in excess with the restricted products of rye-addition wheat, and the mixture was denatured and then re-annealed. In the process of re-annealing, the rye MboI fragments with sequences in common with wheat DNA annealed with the excessive amounts of wheat fragments of different lengths and terminal forms, whereas the MboI fragments with repetitive sequences specific to rye re-annealed to restore their original cohesive terminals. Using this approach, only rye-specific double strands with cohesive ends could be ligated into the subtraction library vectors. The deletion-enrichment scheme was first described for obtaining mouse Y-chromosome genes [52], and had not been reported for plant genomes. Using genomic subtraction, the authors successfully isolated rye-specific DNA elements [47].

A total of 77 recombinant clones were isolated in this study, which represented 1.2% of those generated in the control experiment using the shotgun method to clone MboI fragments that had not undergone subtraction. Thus, it appears that 98.8% of the MboI fragments from the rye-chromosome wheat addition line annealed with the sonicated wheat fragments, whereas 1.2% of the MboI fragments were potentially rye-specific.

From this library, the 77 plasmid DNAs were screened by differential dot hybridization against rye and wheat genomic DNA. Of these, 14 clones were rye-specific, hybridizing strongly to rye DNA but not to wheat DNA. Seven of these clones were identified as belonging to the tandem 350 bp family [41, 42], and one clone to the dispersed R173 family [53, 54], both of which are rye-specific repetitive sequences. Additionally, a single clone contained an 89 bp unknown sequence (GenBank accession AB304276). These results indicate that the subtraction method to remove sequences common to wheat and rye was effective and led to the successful identification of a novel 89 bp sequence from rye, which was further characterized.


Southern blot analysis confirmed that the 89 bp rye sequence identified through genome subtraction was present in the genomes of Secale cereale, Secale vavilovii and Secale montanum, but not in the wheat genome [45, 47]. Therefore, the 89 bp segment is derived from a repetitive sequence found specifically in the R genome of the genus Secale. In order to determine the full-length sequence of the repetitive element harboring the 89 bp fragment, a rye genomic library was constructed and screened with the 89 bp probe [45]. The plaque hybridization analysis found approximately 800 positive plaques from the rye genomic DNA library. Six positive clones were chosen at random, and the restriction mapping revealed that each clone was derived from a different area of the rye genome.

Three clones were sequenced in full, and two that were 92% identical, contained complete structure of the repetitive element harboring the 89 bp segment: 3041 bp long in one and 2929 bp long in the other (GenBank accessions AB124639–124640) [45]. The regions flanking the 3 kb elements did not show any homology between the two clones. Analysis revealed that the consensus sequence of the element contained 20 bp of incomplete TIRs on both ends (5'-TGTgAcGCCCgaGAccGACg-3', 5'-TGTaAtGCCCagGA tggGAC-3'), and sub-terminal short repeat sequences on the 5' end (5'-TCCAGAAGAT-3'). A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiment using the 3041 bp clone as a probe showed that the 3 kb insertion is dispersed across the seven chromosomes of rye [45].

Despite previous extensive characterization of the repetitive elements in the rye genome, the 3 kb element did not show similarity to any known rye repetitive element: the 350 bp family [41, 42], the 120 bp family [41, 55], the 5.3H3 family [43], the R173 family [53, 54] or pSc250 [56]. The entire structure of the 3 kb transposon-like element was also distinct from class I and class II transposable elements. This novel transposon-like element was named Revolver [45].


Revolver is expressed extensively in rye, but there is no transcript in wheat [45]. Weak transcripts are also detected in a rye-chromosome wheat translocation line [45]. A Revolver cDNA clone was identified from a leaf cDNA library, which is 80% identical to the 3 kb genomic probe (AB124665). The full-length cDNA of Revolver is 728 bp long (AB124666). Nucleotide sequence comparison between the two original 3 kb Revolver genomic DNA clones and the cDNAs revealed that the Revolver element consists of three exons of 342 bp, 88 bp and 292 bp, and two introns of 750 bp and 1237 bp (Fig. 11). Splice acceptor and donor sites are also evident at the exon–intron junctions. A putative TATA box is located at base 221, with a cap site at base 261 and a possible polyadenylation signal AATAAA at base 2918 [45]. Therefore, Revolver harbors a single gene consisting of three exons and the initial 89 bp clone obtained by genomic subtraction is located around the second exon.

Fig. (1)
Structure of Revolver. Revolver consists of 3 exons and 2 introns. However, members of the Revolver family showed structural variation in the 5' region, especially in length of 1st exon and 1st intron. These variants of Revolver family yielded several ...

Revolver cDNAs have been cloned from Secale sylvestre, Dasypyrum villosum, Triticum monococcum and Aegilops tauschii using 22-mer primers from each end of Revolver [45]. These cDNAs (AB124645, AB124666, and AB304271–AB304275) contain a single open reading frame (ORF) encoding a protein of 139 amino acid residues. The ORF does not show homology to known transposases; however, the predicted Revolver protein shows similarity to the AsnC/Lrp subfamily of transcriptional regulators and a glycerol-3-phosphate transporter, and includes a DDE motif. Because it has terminal inverted repeats and encodes a DNA binding-like protein, Revolver is considered to be a class II transposable element. However, the inverted repeat sequences and the encoding gene, which identify Revolver as a class II transposon, are unique sequences that are quite different from known class II transposons. Moreover, the entire structure of Revolver does not share whole identity with either class I or class II autonomous transposable elements.

The Ty1-copia group of retrotransposon comprises a major portion of plant genomes [17, 31]. BARE-1, one of the Ty1-copia retrotransposons [57, 58], is transcribed and is dispersed throughout the genome of barley (Hordeum vulgare) [59, 60]. Revolver is quite different from retrotransposons, although it shows partial homology (60%) at both end regions (5' end 123 bp, 3' end 777–2112 bp) to LTRs (long terminal repeats) of large retrotransposon derivative (LARD) elements, such as the nested insertion in the 3' LTR of BARE-1 (3130–4960 bp) [57]. LARD LTR (large retrotransposon derivative–long terminal repeat) is regarded as a solo LTR of the non-autonomous retrotransposon element in barley [61]. The LTRs are two sequences of 5 kb, found to be similar to this insertion in a 66 kb stretch of the barley genome [62, 61]. The LARD LTRs contain a region homologous to both 5' and 3' ends of the Revolver element (Fig. (11)). At the 5' terminus, LARD LTRs have a region of 123–149 bp homologous to upstream of the transcription initiation site of Revolver. At the 3' terminus, LARD LTR-1 (4960 bp) has a region of 2112 bp showing 60% homology to Revolver, from the middle of the first intron to the 3' terminus of Revolver. Another LARD LTR nested in BARE-1 has a region of 777 bp showing 60% homology to the middle of the second intron to downstream of the third exon of Revolver. Both 3' termini coincide with the 3' terminus of the untranslated region downstream of the third exon of Revolver. However, no homology to Revolver was observed in 631–2176 bp of LARD-LTR1 or 598–2353 bp of LARD-LTR nested in BARE-1. As for the region of about 2 kb between these end regions, LARD LTRs lack the region from the first exon to the middle of the first intron. Moreover, the central regions of the LARD LTRs are highly variable [61], but Revolver is entirely conserved. LARD LTRs also contain sequences not present in Revolver in place of the first exon, resulting in noncoding sequences. Revolver and LARD LTRs may be evolutionally related, but LARD LTRs are a structural part of an LTR retrotransposon, whereas Revolver is a single gene consisting of an exon–intron structure. A gene-encoding LTR has never been identified. Therefore, Revolver is quite distinct from LARD LTRs, because exon 1 and exon 2 of Revolver are replaced in the LARD LTRs by different sequences so that a coding region is not present and an autonomous element has never been reported. The presence of a Revolver-like element in barley suggests a wide prevalence of Revolver among the Triticeae.

The novel high-copy element Revolver is transcriptionally active in rye. Some of transposon-like elements exist in high copy numbers in the genomes of most eukaryotes, but the great majority of them are inactive, and only a small portion of them retain the ability to transpose [63, 64]. Very few transposons have been shown to be transcriptionally active. The copia-like retroelement BARE-1 is transcribed in somatic tissues of barley [59]. Some LTR retrotransposons, such as tobacco Tnt1, Tto1 and BARE-1 that are largely inactive, can be transcriptionally activated under conditions of biotic and abiotic stress, including wounding, oxidative stress, and pathogen infection [65, 66]. After stress-induced transcription, the rice LTR retrotransposon Tos17 increases in copy number in the genome [67]. In maize, a survey of more than 4 × 105 expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences identified only 56 retrotransposon cDNAs, supporting the notion that most retrotransposons are inactive. Furthermore, most of these sequences are derived from the low-to-middle repetitive LTR retrotransposons, and not from the very high copy number elements that have been responsible for doubling the size of the maize genome in the past 5–6 million years. In humans, only 30–60 L1 retrotransposon elements out of 5 × 105, which comprise 45% of the genome, are thought to be active [68]. In contrast to the low-level activity of high copy retrotransposons, the highly repetitive Revolver element is transcribed strongly and may retain mobility and mutagenetic potential.

A transcriptionally active Revolver gene is well conserved among the Triticeae members. The methylated and heterochromatic state of most transposons can cause them to change sequence more rapidly than genes [29, 30]. For example, regulation at any stage of the replication cycle for retrotransposons (transcription, translation, reverse transcription and integration of the cDNA) can limit the transposition. Furthermore, the paucity of maize retrotransposon-derived ESTs indicates that some epigenetic mechanisms might repress their transcription. In contrast to these silenced retrotransposons, Revolver is transcriptionally active and short RNA homologues causing RNAi silencing [69-71] have not been observed on Northern blots [45]. Revolver has not suffered from epigenetic silencing mechanisms and might have retained strong transcriptional activity during the long evolution of the Triticeae.


The EcoO109I restriction enzyme cleaves at recognition sites consisting of 5′-PuGGNCCPy-3′ multi-sequences, which are present at a high frequency in rye repetitive repeat families [47]. For this reason, it was used to recover repetitive DNA elements from the rye genome [46] by digesting genomic DNA of self-fertile rye to completion followed by blunting of the cleaved DNA ends. Fragments were used to establish a DNA library from the rye genome. Eighty-six recombinant clones were randomly isolated and dot-hybridization with the total DNA of rye and wheat revealed that 20 of these had strong hybridization signals only for rye.

The core units of the screened repetitive clones were analyzed by Southern blot hybridization after digestion with EcoO109I [46], which confirmed that five of the 20 clones were rye-specific. The clone pSc27 contained an unknown 495 bp sequence (AB464948) and did not show any similarity to known repetitive elements in rye, such as the 350 bp family, the 120 bp family, the 5.3H3 family, the R173 family, and pSc250 [41-43, 51, 53-56, 72]. To determine the entire sequence of the repetitive element harboring the 495 bp fragment, a rye genomic library was screened using the 495 bp sequence as a probe [46]. Plaque hybridization analysis found approximately 800 positive plaques. Three positive clones with insertions of 11.5 to 16.0 kb were chosen at random. Restriction mapping of the three insertions revealed that each was from a different area of the rye genome.

The clones were sequenced in full to determine the structure of the repetitive elements harboring the 495 bp segment [46]. The three full-length sequences were 1432 bp, 1324 bp, and 1292 bp long (AB464949–464951), and showed 88% identity to each other [46]. The regions flanking the repetitive elements showed no homology between each other. The consensus sequence also lacked terminal inverted repeats on both ends. One of the sequenced clones contained two instances of a homologous 192 bp region (Fig. (22)). Despite extensive characterization of the repetitive elements in the rye genome, these elements showed no similarity to any known rye repetitive elements [41-43, 51, 53-56, 72]. The entire structures of the elements did not share identity with class I or class II transposable elements or known repetitive elements. A search in BLASTN against all DNA databases of living organisms revealed that the repetitive elements had similarities only to several segments in Bacterial Artificial Clones (BACs) and ESTs from barley (Fig. (22)). These included BAC No.631P8 (DQ249273) and BAC No.745c13 (AF474071) from barley. Moreover, the 495 bp sequence (AB464948) in clone pSc27 was repeated twice inside BAC No.631P8. Three barley elements in the BACs included the complete structure of the repetitive element harboring the 495 bp segment: one in DQ249273 that was 1531 bp long, one in DQ249273 that was 1293 bp long, and one in AF474071 that was 1160 bp long, with 59% to 64% identity to each other. The presence of similar elements in barley suggests a wide prevalence of this dispersed repetitive sequence family, which has been named Superior, among the Triticeae.

Fig. (2)
Structure of Superior. Superior elements obtained from the rye genome had structural mutations at the 5'-side. The longest sequence contained 2 instances of a homologous 192 bp region.

A FISH experiment using the 495 bp sequence as a probe revealed that Superior is dispersed across the seven chromosomes of rye [46]. The copy number of Superior was calculated by slot blot hybridization, to be 1 × 104 in the rye genome, but only 1 × 102 in the wheat genome. If Superior is a mobile element, as many as 1 × 104 copies of the Superior family have been generated and spread throughout the rye genome since the evolutionary event that separated rye and wheat. The consensus sequence of Superior does not contain TIRs on each end. This may be a result of the fact that Superior shows extreme structural diversity, especially around the 5′ region (Fig. (22)). The Revolver family also shows considerable length variation, which can be attributed to structural variations at the first exon [45]. Most transposable elements are more susceptible to sequence changes than gene-coding sequences, due to their methylated and heterochromatic state [29, 30]. Despite this, several barley ESTs showed similarity to the Superior repetitive element [46].

Following reports of Appels et al. [42, 73, 43], several repetitive DNA families from rye were cloned from methylated relic DNAs. Repetitive sequences from wheat species are though to have differentiated by combining units of different repetitive sequences regardless of methylation level [41, 48-51]. Repetitive elements have been isolated and cloned from non-methylated genomic regions using a method of genomic subtraction [47]. The sizes of the repetitive core units in the four kinds of rye-specific clones obtained were distinguished by EcoO109I digestion [47].

The enzyme EcoO109I can generate polymorphic DNA fragments of unpredictable length because it recognizes the ambiguous motif 5′-PuGGNCCPy-3′, eventually representing 16 different heptamer motifs. EcoO109I is insensitive to (cytosine-5)-methylation of 5′-CG-3′ sites, because none of the possible 16 different EcoO109I recognition motifs overlaps with this (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase recognition motif. On the other hand, when the 5′-PuGGNCCPy-3′ sequence is followed by a G in the genomic DNA, all EcoO109I recognition motifs overlap with two of the possible four different (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase recognition motifs of 5′-CNG-3′. Moreover, all EcoO109I recognition motifs, regardless of which nucleotide follows the 5′- PuGGNCCPy-3′ sequence, always overlap with eight of the 16 possible different (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase recognition motifs of 5′-CNN-3′. In the rye genome, however, only a single homologue of (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase has been localized on chromosome 6R [74] and no sequence information on (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase is available in the NCBI nucleotide or EST databases. Therefore, it is not known whether (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase activity affects the two additional motif classes 5′-CNG-3′ and 5′-CNN-3′.

Using EcoO109I digestion and genome subtraction, it was pertinent that all clones hybridized strongly to EcoO109I repetitive units of different lengths, namely, 380 bp, 960 bp, 5 kb, and 5.5 kb [47]. Total rye genomic DNA was cleaved with EcoO109I and different rye-specific repetitive elements were classified into three classes of rye-specific repetitive elements, based on their sequences: pSc16, pSc27, and pSc5 [46]. These clones hybridized to rye but not to wheat DNA. One well-known rye-specific family of repetitive elements, the 350 family (pSc16, pSc81, pSc109), which is organized into multimers with a 380 bp core unit, was easily recovered. Moreover, new sequence families (pSc27 and pSc5) were successfully identified among 20 clones screened from a small population of 86 clones [46]. The unique element from the pSc27 class identified was named Superior. EcoO109I could therefore be a useful tool for studying the organization and differentiation of large amounts of repetitive sequences in the rye genome.

The full-length sequence of the novel dispersed repetitive sequence family Superior harboring the 495 bp fragment of pSc27 was determined using a rye genomic library [46]. As mentioned earlier, the structure of the Superior elements do not share any identity with class I or class II transposable elements or known repetitive elements, but are similar to barley BAC sequences. The presence of similar elements in barley indicates the wide prevalence of Superior among the Triticeae.

Several barley EST clones also showed similarity to the Superior repetitive element (Fig. (22)). Analysis revealed that Superior, like Revolver, is transcriptionally active. This is in contrast to the methylated and silenced retrotransposon R173 family in the rye genome [54, 47]. The RNA secondary structure of Superior, as predicted by the software SCARNA, consists of four well developed stems with hairpin loops. The stems are predicted to have at least ten internal loops. Because SCARNA aligns the candidate sequence with known secondary stem structures, the well developed stem structure of Superior suggested that Superior has a role as RNA.


The distribution of Revolver in the Triticeae has been analyzed by Southern and slot blotting techniques [45]. The Revolver cDNA probe hybridized strongly to gel blots of the wheat relatives Secale sp. (RR) and D. villosum (VV), and moderately to the wheat ancestral species T. monococcum (AA), Aegilops speltoides (SS), T. dicoccum (AABB) and Ae. tauschii (DD). These cereals may share a large Revolver superfamily stemming from their common progenitor. On the contrary, Revolver cDNA did not hybridize to T. aestivum genomic DNA. DNA slot blot analysis confirmed that Revolver elements are abundant in the genomes of Secale sp. and D. villosum (over 104 copies), and Revolver is present at moderate copy numbers in the wheat ancestral species T. monococcum , T. dicoccum and Ae. tauschii (3 × 103 – 8 × 103 copies). Bread wheat is an allohexaploid carrying three different subgenomes, A, B, and D [75] resulting from two independent hybridization events. The first combined the A genome of the wild diploid wheat T. monococcum (AA) and the B genome, which has the greatest genetic similarity to the S genome of Ae. speltoides [76-78]. This resulted in the tetraploid ancestor of modern Triticum species T. dicoccum, which hybridized with Ae. tauschii, the diploid donor of the D genome, over 8000 years ago, resulting in hexaploid wheat [79]. Revolver is very rare in bread wheat (103 copies). These observations indicate that Revolver has existed since the diploid progenitor of wheat, and it has been amplified in rye and some other species, whereas Revolver has been lost from bread wheat through evolution accompanied by hexaploidization. Revolver exhibits quantitative variation during evolution of the Triticeae.

The rye haploid genome contains 3.9 Gb of DNA and is the largest among the Triticeae genomes. The highly repetitive Revolver and Superior elements have been visualized over the entire lengths of the rye chromosomes in FISH experiments. Generally, angiosperm genomes vary tremendously in size; some species have less than 50 Mb of DNA per haploid genome and others have more than 85,000 Mb [80]. The lack of correlation between the complexity of the organism and the size of the genome has long been recognized as a C value paradox [81]. There is great variability in genome size among the grass family Poaceae: 450 Mb for rice, 2500 Mb for maize, 5000 Mb for barley, and 16000 Mb for hexaploid wheat [82]. Most of the variation in genome size is attributable to the amount of repetitive DNA, which comprises 70% of cereal genomes [1, 3]. Cot analysis has estimated that repetitive sequences comprise 92% of the rye genome [36], and 24% of these have been differentiated in a rye-specific array [1]. The considerable accumulation of Revolver and Superior elements in rye may be one of the reasons why the rye genome has became so enlarged compared with other members of the Triticeae. As many as 2 × 104 copies of the Revolver family and as many as 1 × 104 copies of the Superior family have been generated and spread throughout the rye genome as mobile elements since the evolutionary event that separated rye and wheat. The considerable variation of Revolver copy number among the wheat-related species indicates their propagation activity during evolution of the Triticeae tribe. The name of the novel transposon-like gene Revolver means a dynamic factor influencing genome construction through the evolution of the Triticeae.

The structure of the Revolver and Superior elements is quite different from those of known repetitive elements. It is well known that repetitive DNA comprises 70% or more of many large plant genomes, such as those of maize, wheat, and barley [6, 7, 60, 82]. Of the repetitive DNA, the LTR retrotransposons in particular have increased copy numbers [84, 85] and have thus contributed greatly to the expansion of these genomes [5, 22, 58, 86, 87]. Over a broad range of organisms, retrotransposon copy number appears to be correlated with genome size. The small genome of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (13 × 106 bp) contains 51 full-length retrotransposons [88]. In the large genome of maize (2500 Mb), some retrotransposons have copy numbers exceeding 2 × 104 per haploid genome [6, 83, 86, 89], and all of the retrotransposons sequenced appear to have been inserted within the last 6 million years, leading to a doubling of the size of the maize genome [30]. The copy number of the DNA-type (class II) transposable element is generally less than that of the highly repetitive retrotransposons, but recent analysis of the growing genomic databases has revealed that plant genomes harbor a huge copy number of DNA-type transposable elements termed MITEs [25, 27]. Class II transposable elements such as MITE and CACTA elements may also have contributed to the expansion of plant genomes [25, 27, 90, 91]. Dozens of different transposable elements that belong to different classes identified in the rye genome have been deposited in the GenBank database. They include Copia elements (e.g. AJ240111; 32 clones in total), Gypsy elements (e.g. AJ295137), LINE elements (e.g. AB457042), SINE elements (e.g. AB046150), CACTA elements (e.g. AF492376), and MITE elements (e.g. EF077404). Revolver and Superior are clearly different from both the retrotransposons (Class I) and the DNA-type (Class II) transposable elements. They are also distinct from other retrotransposons such as SINE and LINE element, which constitute 10% of the human genome and are abundant in mammalian genomes [92-94]. The transposon-like genes Revolver and Superior are novel members of a major genomic component, as are LTR retrotransposons, SINE, MITE, and CACTA elements, which have contributed to plant genome construction and evolution.

Revolver is less frequent in the genome of hexaploid bread wheat than its ancestors. The polyploidy that arises either by duplication of a single genome or by the acquisition of a few genomes from related species (allopolyploidy) is a major force in the evolution of plants; 50–70% of angiosperms have experienced at least one episode of polyploidy in their history [95, 8]. The combination of A, B and D genomes into a single nucleus in wheat may have generated more incompatibility than harmony for the propagation of some genes [96-98]. Revolver contains a single ORF encoding a 139 amino acid residue protein, which features a transcriptional regulator able to bind DNA [45], suggesting that the Revolver element can transpose in a cut-and-paste fashion, like class II elements. In wheat, no transcript of the Revolver gene is observed by Northern blot and no Revolver cDNA is recovered by RT-PCR [45]. An EST homologue of Revolver is highly degenerated compared with cDNA sequences obtained from other wheat-related species. Revolver may have been eliminated from the wheat genome because of losing the gene activity needed to reintegrate into the host wheat genome after polyploidy-induced incompatibility among the three genomes.

As well as having a history of genome expansion, flowering plants appear to have undergone genome contraction [99-101]. One possible mechanism that reduces genome size is unequal intrastrand recombination between two tandem repeats in direct orientation on the same chromatid. The outcome of this type of event is a net deletion of one repeat and the sequences between the repeats. Unequal intrastrand recombination between adjacent LTR retrotransposons might lead to a decrease in the size of a genome, a phenomenon that is supported by the abundance of solo LTRs and the general absence of the LTR-internal-LTR structure [99]. Deletions of retrotransposons are relatively common in insects [102]. Highly saturated Revolver sequences in the wheat polyploid genome could generate potential sites for unequal intrastrand recombination, and recombination between adjacent Revolver elements might have reduced the copy number in the wheat genome. The considerably destructive variants of Revolver may have stemmed from such unequal recombination events.

Rye is well adapted to extreme climatic and soil conditions, making it a useful genetic resource for the breeding of its major cereal crop relatives. Cultivated rye (Secale cereale L.) has been used as a gene source for wheat and triticale breeding by interspecific chromosome introgression and rearrangement, translocation or substitution. A representative achievement of this type of manipulation is the introduction of a stem rust resistance gene into wheat. Rye also has the lowest requirements of the cereal crops for chemical treatments like fertilizers or pesticides, making it an ecologically desirable crop for specific regions such as northern Europe. The rye genome still has a gene resource potential for future improvement of wheat. Rye-specific repeated sequences have been useful as probes to analyze alien chromatins and chromosomal constitutions in wheat-rye crossbreeding [37, 38]. Revolver and Superior are enriched in the genomes of Secale species but are rare in the bread wheat genome. These novel rye-specific elements might serve as molecular markers for rye DNA introduced into bread wheat and other plant species. The overall dispersion along all chromosomes might not add a new usable feature for the probe compared with the already established in situ probes [37, 103-105]. However, Superior might be an effective tool for using PCR methods such as SSAP (Sequence-specific Amplified Polymorphism) [106] to develop molecular tags for rye chromosomes, because the structural diversity, especially around the 5′ region, can yield many polymorphisms, as has been shown with Revolver [45, 107]. Revolver is an effective tool for developing molecular tags for transferring useful germplasm of the wheat relatives rye and Dasypyrum into the wheat genome. Revolver has the potential to be used in FISH analyses as a Southern probe for genotyping and as a dispersed PCR entry point to amplify rye-specific multiple genomic fragments [107]. Revolver is attractive as an index of genomic evolution and as a landmark of chromosomes useful for evaluating evolutionary relationships among the tribe Triticeae.

In conclusion, genomic cloning by genome subtraction or by using the EcoO109I restriction enzyme to cut PuGGNCCPy multi-sequences has led to the discovery of Revolver and Superior, novel members of the major genomic component. Similarly to LTR retrotransposons and MITEs, Revolver and Superior occur at drastically different copy numbers between bread wheat and rye, making them a useful genetic resource for wheat breeding. Revolver consists of a single gene encoding a DNA-binding-like protein, which is transcriptionally active and does not suffer from epigenetic silencing. Revolver elements feature an autonomous transposon, which may complement in trans the propagation of related elements, including LARD, which might have contributed to plant genome expansion, rearrangement and evolution.


1. Flavell RB, Rimpau JR, Smith DB. Repeated sequence DNA relationships in four cereal genomes. Chromosoma. 1977;63:205–222.
2. Grandbastien MA. Retroelements in higher plants. Trends Genet. 1992;8:103–108. [PubMed]
3. Barakat A, Carels N, Bernardi G. The distribution of genes in the genomes of Gramineae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:6857–6861. [PubMed]
4. Panstruga R, Buschges R, Piffanelli P, Schulze-Lefert P. A contiguous 60 kb genomic stretch from barley reveals molecular evidence for gene islands in a monocot genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:1056–1062. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Park ET, Kazazian HH., Jr Mobile elements and the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2000;1:134–144. [PubMed]
6. SanMiguel P, Bennetzen JL. Evidence that a recent increase in maize genome size was caused by the massive amplification of intergene retrotransposons. Ann. Bot. 1998;82:37–44.
7. Myers BC, Tingey SV, Morgante M. Abundance, distribution, and transcriptional activity of repetitive elements in the maize genome. Genome Res. 2001;11:1660–1676. [PubMed]
8. Wendel JF. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000;42:225–249. [PubMed]
9. Bennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM. Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 2005;95:127–132. [PubMed]
10. Brown JWS, Marshall DF, Echeverria M. Intronic noncoding RNAs and splicing. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:335–342. [PubMed]
11. Feschotte C. Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008;9:397–405. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Siomi H, Siomi MC. Interactions between transposable elements and Argonautes have (probably) been shaping the Drosophila genome throughout evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008;18:181–187. [PubMed]
13. Finnegan DJ. Transposable elements. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1992;2:861–867. [PubMed]
14. Boeke JD, Chapman KB. Retrotransposition mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1991;3:502–507. [PubMed]
15. Adams SE, Mellor J, Gull K, Sim RB, Tuite M. F., Kingsman SM, Kingsman AJ. The function and relationships of Ty-VLP proteins in yeast reflect those of mammalian retroviral proteins. Cell. 1987;49:111–119. [PubMed]
16. Doolittle RF, Feng D.-F., Johnson MS, McClure MA. Origins and evolutionary relationships of retroviruses. Q. Rev. Biol. 1989;64:1–30. [PubMed]
17. Flavell AJ, Dunbar E, Anderson R, Pearce SR, Hartley R, Kumar A. Ty1-copia group retrotransposons are ubiquitous and heterogeneous in higher plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:3639–3644. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Voytas DF, Cummings MP, Konieczny AK, Ausubel FM, Rodermel SR. Copia-like retrotransposons are ubiquitous among plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:7124–7128. [PubMed]
19. Bennetzen JL. The Mutator transposable element system of maize. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 1996;204:195–229. [PubMed]
20. Suoniemi A, Tanskanen J, Schulman AH. Gypsy-like retrotransposons are widespread in the plant kingdom. Plant J. 1998;13:699–705. [PubMed]
21. Vicient CM, Kalendar R, Schulman AH. Envelope-class retrovirus-like elements are widespread, transcribed and spliced, and insertionally polymorphic in plants. Genome Res. 2001;11:2041–2049. [PubMed]
22. Bennetzen JL. Transposable element contribution to plant gene and genome evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000;42:251–269. [PubMed]
23. Flavell AJ, Pearce SR, Kumar A. Plant transposable elements and the genome. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1994;4:838–844. [PubMed]
24. Kunze R, Well CF. In: Mobile DNA II. Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M, Lambowitz M, editors. Washington, D.C: American Society of Microbiology; 2002. pp. 565–610.
25. Zhang X, Jiang N, Feschotte C, Wessler SR. PIF- and Pong-like transposable elements: distribution, evolution and relationship with Tourist-like miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements. Genetics. 2004;166:971–986. [PubMed]
26. Wessler SR, Bureau TE, White SE. LTR-retrotransposons and MITEs; important players in the evolution of plant genomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1995;5:814–821. [PubMed]
27. Feschotte C, Wessler SR. Mariner-like transposases are widespread and diverse in flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:280–285. [PubMed]
28. Von Strenberg RM, Novick GE, Gao G.-P., Herrera RJ. In: Transposable Elements and Evolution. McDonald JF, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993. pp. 108–139.
29. Marillonnet S, Wessler SR, et al. Extreme structural heterogeneity among the members of a maize. Genetics. 1998;150:1245–1246. [PubMed]
30. SanMiguel P, Gaut BS, Tikhonov A, Nakajima Y, Bennetzen JL, et al. The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nature Genet. 1998;20:43–45. [PubMed]
31. Kumar A, Pearce SR, McLean K, Harrison G, Heslop-Harrison JS, Waugh R, Flavell AJ. The Ty1-copia group of retrotransposons in plants: genomic organisation, evolution, and use as molecular markers. Genetica. 1997;100:205–217. [PubMed]
32. Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M. Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:7783–7788. [PubMed]
33. Bennetzen JL. The contribution of retroelements to plant genome organization, function and evolution. Trends Microbiol. 1996;4:347–353. [PubMed]
34. Stein N. Triticeae genomics: advances in sequence analysis of large genome cereal crops. Chromosome Res. 2007;15:21–31. [PubMed]
35. Wicker T, Narechania A, Sabot F, Stein J, Vu GTH, Graner A, Ware D, Stein N. Low-pass shotgun sequencing of the barley genome facilitates rapid identification of genes, conserved non-coding sequences and novel repeats. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:518. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Flavell RB, Bennett MD, Smith JB, Smith DB. Genome size and the proportion of repeated sequence DNA in plants. Biochem. Genet. 1974;12:257–269. [PubMed]
37. Guidet F, Rogowsky P, Taylor C, Song W, Langridge P. Cloning and characterization of a new rye-specific repeated sequence. Genome. 1991;34:81–87.
38. Cuadrado A, Vitellozzi F, Jouve N, Ceoloni C. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with multiple repeated DNA probes applied to the analysis of wheat-rye chromosome pairing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1997;94:347–355.
39. Pearce SR, Harrison GE, Heslop-Harrison JS, Flavell AJ, Kumar A. Characterization and genomic organization of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons in rye (Secale careale) Genome. 1997;40:617–625. [PubMed]
40. Francki MG. Identification of Bilby, a diverged centromeric Ty1-copia retrotransposon family from cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) Genome. 2001;44:266–274. [PubMed]
41. Bedbrook JR, Jones J, O'Dell M, Thompson RD, Flavell RB. A molecular description of telomeric heterochromatin in Secale species. Cell. 1980;19:545–560. [PubMed]
42. Appels R, Dennis ES, Smyth DR, Peacock WJ. Two repeated DNA sequences from the heterochromatic regions of rye (Secale cereale) chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1981;84:265–277.
43. Appels R, Moran LB, Gustafson JP. Rye heterochromatin. I. Studies on clusters of the major repeating sequence and the identification of a new dispersed repetitive sequence element. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 1986;28:645–657.
44. Alves E, Ballesteros I, Linacero R, Vazquez AM. RYS1, a foldback transposon, is activated by tissue culture and shows preferential insertion points into the rye genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005;111:431–436. [PubMed]
45. Tomita M, Shinohara K, Morimoto M. Revolver is a new class of transposon-like gene composing the Triticeae genome. DNA Res. 2008;15:49–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Tomita M, Kuramochi M, Iwata S. Superior: a novel repetitive DNA element dispersed in the rye genome. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2009;125:306–320. [PubMed]
47. Tomita M, Akai K, Morimoto T. Genomic subtraction recovers rye-specific DNA elements enriched in the rye genome. Mol. Biotechnol. 2009;42:160–167. [PubMed]
48. Flavell RB, Smith DB. Nucleotide organization in the wheat genome. Heredity. 1976;37:231–252.
49. Smith DB, Flavell RB. Nucleotide sequence organization in the rye genome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1977;474:82–97. [PubMed]
50. Flavell RB, O'Dell M, Hutchinson J. Nucleotide sequence organization in plant chromosomes and evidence for sequence translocation during evolution. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1981;45:501–506. [PubMed]
51. McIntyre CL, Clarke BC, Appels R. Amplification and dispersion of repeated DNA sequences in the Triticeae. Plant Syst. Evol. 1988;160:39–59.
52. Lamar EE, Palmer E. Y-encoded, species-specific DNA in mice: Evidence that the Y chromosome exists in two polymorphic forms in inbred strains. Cell. 1984;37:171–177. [PubMed]
53. Rogowsky PM, Manning S, Liu JY, Langridge P. The R173 family of rye-specific repetitive DNA sequences: a structural analysis. Genome. 1991;34:88–95.
54. Rogowsky PM, Liu JY, Manning S, Taylor C, Langridge P. Structural heterogeneity in the R173 family of rye-specific repetitive DNA sequences. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992;20:95–102. [PubMed]
55. McIntyre CL, Pereira S, Moran LB, Appels R. New Secale cereale (rye) DNA derivatives for the detection of rye chromosome segments in wheat. Genome. 1990;33:635–640. [PubMed]
56. Vershinin AV, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS. The large-scale genomic organization of repetitive DNA families at the telomeres of rye chromosomes. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1823–1833. [PubMed]
57. Manninen I, Schulman AH. BARE-1, a copia-like retroelement in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Plant Mol. Biol. 1993;22:829–846. [PubMed]
58. Suoniemi A, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Arna T, Schulman AH. Retrotransposon BARE-1 is a major, dispersed component of the barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genome. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996;30:1321–1329. [PubMed]
59. Suoniemi A, Narvanto A, Schulman AH. The BARE-1 retrotransposon is transcribed in barley from an LTR promoter active in transient assays. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996;31:295–306. [PubMed]
60. Vicient CM, Suoniemi A, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Tanskanen J, Beharav A, Nevo E, Schulman AH. Retrotransposon BARE-1 and its role in genome evolution in the genus Hordeum. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1769–1784. [PubMed]
61. Kalendar R, Vicient C M, Peleg O, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Bolshoy A, Schulman AH. Large retrotransposon derivatives: abundant, conserved but nonautonomous retroelements of barley and related genomes. Genetics. 2004;166:1437–1450. [PubMed]
62. Shirasu K, Schulman AH, Lahaye T, Schuze-Lefert P. A contiguous 66-kb barley DNA sequence provides evidence for reversible genome expansion. Genome Res. 2000;10:908–915. [PubMed]
63. Grandbastien MA. Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3:181–187.
64. Kumar A, Bennetzen JL. Plant retrotransposons. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1999;33:479–532. [PubMed]
65. Vernhettes S, Grandbastien M.-A., Casacuberta JM. In vivo characterization of transcriptional regulatory sequences involved in the defence-associated expression of the tobacco retrotransposon Tnt1. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997;35:673–679. [PubMed]
66. Takeda S, Sugimoto K, Otsuki H, Hirochika H. Transcriptional activation of the tobacco retrotransposon Tto1 by wounding and methyl jasmonate. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998;36:365–376. [PubMed]
67. Hirochika H. Activation of tobacco retrotransposons during tissue culture. EMBO J. 1993;12:2521–2528. [PubMed]
68. Ostertag EM, Kazazian HH., Jr Biology of mammalian L1 retrotransposons. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2001;35:501–538. [PubMed]
69. Hamilton A, Voinnet O, Chappell L, Baulcombe D. Two classes of short interfering RNA in RNA silencing. EMBO J. 2002;21:4671–4679. [PubMed]
70. Llave C, Kasschau KD, Rector MA, Carrington JC. Endogenous and silencing-associated small RNAs in plants. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1605–1619. [PubMed]
71. Sunker R, Girke T, Zhu J.-K. Identification and characterization of endogenous small interfering RNAs from rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:4443–4454. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Vershinin AV, Alkhimova OG, Heslop-Harrison JS. Molecular diversification of tandemly organized DNA sequences and heterochromatic chromosome regions in some Triticeae species. Chromosome Res. 1996;4:517–525. [PubMed]
73. Appels R, Gustafson JP, May CE. Structural variation in the heterochromatin of rye chromosomes in Triticales. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1982;63:235–244. [PubMed]
74. Korzun V, Balzer HJ, Balzer A, Bäumlein H, Börner A. Chromosomal location of three wheat sequences with homology to pollen allergen encoding, DNA replication regulating, and DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase genes in wheat and rye. Genome. 1996;39:1213–1215. [PubMed]
75. Dvorak J, McGuire PE, Cassidy B. Apparent sources of the A genomes of wheats inferred from polymorphism in abundance and restriction fragment length of repeated nucleotide sequences. Genome. 1988;30:680–689.
76. Dvorak J, Zhang HB. Reconstruction of the phylogeny of the genus Triticum from variation in repeated nucleotide sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1992;84:419–429. [PubMed]
77. Friebe B, Gill BS. Jauhar PP. Methods of Genome Analysis in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1996. pp. 39–60.
78. Tsunewaki K. Jauhar PP. Methods of Genome Analysis in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1996. pp. 271–299.
79. Feldman M, Lupton FGH, Miller TE. In: Evolution of Crop Plants. 2nd. Smartt J, Simmonds NW, editors. Longman Scientific: London; 1995. pp. 184–192.
80. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Ann. Bot. 1995;76:113–176.
81. Thomas CA. The genetic organization of chromosomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1971;5:237–256. [PubMed]
82. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1991;9:208–218.
83. Wicker T, Stein N, Albar L, Feuillet C, Schlagenhauf E, Keller B. Analysis of a contiguous 211 kb sequence in diploid wheat (Triticum monococcum L.) reveals multiple mechanisms of genome evolution. Plant J. 2001;26:307–316. [PubMed]
84. Doolittle WF, Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 1980;284:601–603. [PubMed]
85. Orgel LE, Crick FHC. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980;84:604–607. [PubMed]
86. SanMiguel P, Tikhonov A, Jin YK, Motchoulskaia N, Zakharov D, Melake-Berhan A, Springer PS, Edwards KJ, Lee M, Avramova Z, Bennetzen JL. Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science. 1996;274:765–768. [PubMed]
87. Tikhonov AP, SanMiguel PJ, Nakajima Y, Gorensten NM, Bennetzen JL, Avramova Z. Colinearity and its exceptions on orthologous adh regions of maize and sorghum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:7409–7414. [PubMed]
88. Kim JM, Vanguri S, Boeke JD, Gabriel A, Voytas DF. Transposable elements and genome organization: A comprehensive survey of retrotransposons revealed by the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. Genome Res. 1998;8:464–478. [PubMed]
89. Ramakrishna W, Dubcovsky J, Park Y.-J., Busso C, Emberton J, SanMiguel P, Bennetzen JL. Different types and rates of genome evolution detected by comparative sequence analysis of orthologous segments from four cereal genomes. Genetics. 2002;162:1389–1400. [PubMed]
90. Langdon T, Jenkins G, Hasterok R, Jones RN, King IP. A high-copy-number CACTA family transposon in temperate grasses and cereal. Genetics. 2003;163:1097–1108. [PubMed]
91. Wicker T, Guyot R, Yahiaoui N, Keller B. CACTA transposons in Triticeaes: A diverse family of high-copy repetitive elements. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:52–63. [PubMed]
92. Okada N. SINEs: short interspersed repeated elements of the eukaryotic genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1991;6:358–361. [PubMed]
93. Murata S, Takasaki N, Saitou M, Okada N. Determination of the phylogenetic relationships among Pacific salmonids by using short interspersed elements (SINEs) as temporal landmarks of evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:6995–6999. [PubMed]
94. Ohshima K, Hamada M, Terai Y, Okada N. The 3′ ends of tRNA-derived short interspersed repetitive elements are derived from the 3′ ends of long interspersed repetitive elements. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996;16:3756–3764. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. Polyploidy in angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci. 1997;2:470–476.
96. Feldman M, Liu B, Segal G, Abbo S, Levy AA, Vega JM. Rapid elimination of low-copy DNA sequence in polyploid wheat: a possible mechanism for differentiation of homoeologous chromosomes. Genetics. 1997;147:1381–1387. [PubMed]
97. Ozkan H, Levy AA, Feldman M. Allopolyploidy-induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) group. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1735–1747. [PubMed]
98. SanMiguel P, Remakrishna W, Bennetzen JL, Busso C, Dubcovsky J. Transposable elements, genes and recombination in a 215-kb contig from wheat chromosome 5Am. Funct. Integr. Genomics. 2002;2:70–80. [PubMed]
99. Bennetzen JL, Kellogg EA. Do plants have a one-way ticket to genomic obesity? Plant Cell. 1997;9:1509–1514. [PubMed]
100. Kellogg EA. Relationships of cereal crops and other grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:2005–2010. [PubMed]
101. Leitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-value provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 1998;82:85–94.
102. Petrov DA, Sangster TA, Johnston JS, Hartl DL, Shaw KL. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science. 2000;287:1060–1062. [PubMed]
103. Cuadrado A, Jouve M. Distribution of highly repeated DNA sequences in species of the genus Secale. Genome. 1997;40:309–317. [PubMed]
104. Cuadrado A, Jouve M. Evolutionary trends of different repetitive DNA sequences during speciation in the genus Secale. J. Hered. 2002;93:339–345. [PubMed]
105. Yuan WY, Tomita M. Centromeric distribution of 350-family in Dasypyrum villosum and its application to identifying Dasypyrum chromatin in the wheat genome. Hereditas. 2009;146:58–66. [PubMed]
106. Waugh R, McLean K, Flavell AJ, Pearce SR, Kumar A, Thomas BTT, Powell W. Genetic distribution of Bare-1-like retrotransposable elements in the barley genome revealed by sequence-specific amplification polymorphisms (S-SAP) Mol. Gen. Genet. 1997;253:687–694. [PubMed]
107. Tomita M. Revolver-2: a novel transposon-like element from rye. US Patent. 1977 No. 7351536B2.

Articles from Current Genomics are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers