PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jkneurosocJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
 
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 March; 47(3): 217–220.
Published online 2010 March 31. doi:  10.3340/jkns.2010.47.3.217
PMCID: PMC2851086

Dorsal Extradural Lumbar Disc Herniation Causing Cauda Equina Syndrome : A Case Report and Review of Literature

Jin-Sung Kim, M.D.,corresponding author1 Sang-Ho Lee, M.D., Ph.D.,1 and Nikhil J. Arbatti, M.D.2

Abstract

A 73-year-old male presented with a rare dorsally sequestrated lumbar disc herniation manifesting as severe radiating pain in both leg, progressively worsening weakness in both lower extremities, and urinary incontinence, suggesting cauda equina syndrome. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested the sequestrated disc fragment located in the extradural space at the L4-L5 level had surrounded and compressed the dural sac from the lateral to dorsal sides. A bilateral decompressive laminectomy was performed under an operating microscope. A large extruded disc was found to have migrated from the ventral aspect, around the thecal sac, and into the dorsal aspect, which compressed the sac to the right. After removal of the disc fragment, his sciatica was relieved and the patient felt strength of lower extremity improved.

Keywords: Lumbar disc herniation, Dorsal, Intradural, Migrated

INTRODUCTION

A lumbar disc sequestration is penetration of the posterior annulus and the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) and migration of intervertebral disc within the spinal epidural space. The majority of ruptured or sequestrated disc fragments migrate in upward, downward, or lateral directions owing to anatomic properties of the anterior epidural space. Dorsal extradural sequestration of disc herniation is very rare, and there are few reported cases of the migration of lumbar disc herniation to the dorsal surface of the thecal sac6-8). We present an unusual case of dorsal extradural sequestration of lumbar disc herniation. We review the literature and discuss the difficulties in the diagnostic evaluation of such a migrated disc fragment.

CASE REPORT

A 73-year-old man presented with severe leg pain, acute low back pain, and urinary incontinence. The patient could not extend his low back due to severe radicular leg pain. Reflexes were absent at the knee and ankle, and motor strength of ankle dorsiflexion and great toe dorsiflexion were 3/5 in both legs. There was bilateral lumbo-sacral hypoesthesia in the S1, S2, and S3 dermatomes. Rectal tone was decreased but the patient had no bowel bladder disturbances.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed a large isointensity lesion at the L4-L5 level on the T2 axial image (Fig. 1), indenting circumferentially the thecal sac from lateral to posterior of the thecal sac on the right side and extrusion of the disc compressing the thecal sac on the left side of the next below the level. T2-weighted sagittal image (Fig. 2A) demonstrated that a low intensity lesion within the thecal sac compressed film terminale. It seemed to be intradural disc herniation. Gadolium enhanced T1-weighted sagittal image (Fig. 2B) revealed the lesion well defined with marginal enhancement. On MR myelography (Fig .3), there was a complete block of the signal at the L4-L5 level. On the axial computed tomography (CT) scan, at the L4-L5 disc level, there was an iso-intense lesion that appeared to compress the thecal sac from the right side (Fig. 4). The radiological scans gave a probable diagnosis of either an intradural disc herniation or less likely, a posterior extradural disc herniation. The authors planned bilateral laminotomy and if needed, durotomy. The surgery was performed under neural intraoperative monitoring (NIM). Intra-operatively, after removing the ligamentum flavum, we noticed some irregular and hard material encased in veins; it was enveloping the thecal sac from behind (Fig. 5). After removing the material slowly with the help of a nerve hook, we found it to be the herniated disc, which was covered in veins. After the removal, the thecal sac was relatively free and fluctuating again.

Fig. 1
A : T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance (MR) image at the L4-L5 level showing a lesion compressing circumferentially the thecal sac from the right side. B : T2-weighted axial MR image at the next below the level showing extruded disc compressing the ...
Fig. 2
A : T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) image showing a low intensity lesion at L4-L5 level compressing the dural sac from posterior or either intradural location. B : Gadolium enhanced T1-weighted sagittal MR image showing the lesion well defined ...
Fig. 3
Magnetic resonance myelograph showing complete block of the signal at L4-L5 level.
Fig. 4
Axial computed tomography scan at the L4-L5 level showing an isointense lesion (arrow) from right side.
Fig. 5
Intraoperative photograph. After removal of ligamentum flavum, disc material (*) was exposed posterior to the dural sac.

After surgery, the patient was relieved of the pain, and discharged without further complications. The patient felt the strength of the lower extremities improving at 3 months follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Sequestrated disc fragments account for 28.6% of all symptomatic disc herniations1,3). Herniated disc fragments are known to migrate within the spinal canal in many directions, including cranial, caudal, and lateral10). However, posterior epidural migration of an extruded disc in the lumbar region is relative rare because the PPL at the level of the concave vertebral bodies forms the anterior epidural space between itself and the periosteum of the vertebral bodies; this is separated in the midline by the septum posticum, which prevents the movement of the herniated disc from one side to the other2,17). At the level of the disc, the PLL is firmly adherent to the posterior annulus and is attached to the lateral membrane, also called peridural membrane17,18), which extends medially from the lateral edge of the PLL to the lateral wall of the spinal canal; it limits the movement of the extruded disc fragment beyond the postero-lateral corner of the dural sac. This makes it difficult for a disc to herniate posterior to the dural sac5,17,20).

Due to the general nature of disc herniation being in either upward or downward direction, there are very a few reports of posterior extradural disc migration since it is not the first impression that is taken into account2,6-8,10). The earliest report of such an occurrence was by Lombardi13) in 1973.

It is difficult to diagnose posterior extradural disc herniation. MR imaging is now accepted as the gold standard for the evaluation of lumbar disc herniation and should be done as a baseline investigation to diagnose the herniation and the migration if present4,11,16,19). In the case of an extradural herniation the herniated disc fragment will appear hypo-toisointense on the T1-weighted image and hyperintense on T2 images, which was similar to our case1,12). The posterior compression of the dural sac may sometimes lead to an impression of either an epidural abscess or a benign epidural tumor. If diagnosis is uncertain, a Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging scan should be performed if possible10).

Pathologically, when a disc herniates posteriorly, it squeezes along with it epidural fat; the epidural fat being vascular, the vessels are concentrated and encircle the herniated fragment10,15). Inflammation due to vasoactive factors released by the herniated disc can develop hypervascularization around the fragment14). These phenomena lead to hyperhydration of the fragments, and signal changes that are similar, but not identical to, the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), thus leading to rim enhancement findings after Gadolinium injection. Our literature review supports these MR imaging findings in most cases. The enhanced signal on Gadolinium-injected scans may sometimes result in a misleading differential diagnosis10,15).

The differential diagnosis of an enhanced lesion can be : arthro-synovial cyst, meningeal cyst, ligament cyst, perineural cyst, abscess, benign tumor, or hematoma. However, meningeal cyst doesn't show Gadolinium enhancement and shows a similar signal to CSF. Synovial cyst from the facet joint is centered on the facet, and rim enhancement is often seen. Tumorous conditions have different patterns of enhancement, showing no rim enhancement.

In our case, the indicating factor towards a disc herniation was that the patient had a sudden development of symptoms and otherwise his general health was good, apart from his pathological reports being normal. All of these factors pointed towards the less likely possibility of epidural tumor or abscess. The literature review shows 20 cases of cauda equina syndrome associated with dorsal extradural lumbar disc herniation since the first report by Lombardi13) in 1973. All of these cases exhibited rim enhancement of the extruded disc.

A reason for such a herniation could be due to what Kuzeyli et al.9) has suggested, that heavy labor, traction, spinal manipulation, and conditions of hypermobility may predispose the disc, to posterior migration of the fragments. As seen by us in our review of similar cases most of them have history of some trauma before the onset of symptoms, which support this hypothesis. Also in all cases, prompt surgery by an open procedure with complete decompression provided good results.

CONCLUSION

We reported a case of dorsal extradural lumbar disc herniation mimicking intradural disc. Determining the location of lumbar disc herniation, either extradural or intradural, is a diagnostic challenge. Where there is concern about the diagnosis, appropriate scans and different diagnostic modes should be utilized. Any compressive lesion causing cauda equina syndrome should be decompressed on an urgent basis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from the Wooridul Spine Foundation.

References

1. Baker JK, Hanson GW. Cyst of the ligamentum flavum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:1092–1094. [PubMed]
2. Bonaroti EA, Welch WC. Posterior epidural migration of an extruded lumbar disc fragment causing cauda equine syndrome. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:378–381. [PubMed]
3. Brock M, Patt S, Mayer HM. The form and structure of extruded disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:1457–1461. [PubMed]
4. Coscia M, Lepzig T, Cooper D. Acute cauda equina syndrome. Diagnostic advantage of MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:475–478. [PubMed]
5. Hogan QH. Lumbar epidural anatomy. A new look by cryomicrotome section. Anaesthesiology. 1991;75:767–775. [PubMed]
6. Kim JH, Kong MH, Lee SK, Song KY. A case of posterior epidural migration an extruded lumbar disc fragement causion cauda eqiuna syndrome. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2004;35:442–444.
7. Kim MS, Hur JW, Lee JW, Lee HK. Posterior and lateral epidural migration of extruded lumbar disc fragments : case report. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2003;33:297–298.
8. Kim SJ, Song JH, Kim MH, Park HK, Kim SH, Shin KM, et al. Sequestrated disc mimicking benign neurogenic tumor : report of 2 cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1997;26:596–599.
9. Kuzeyli K, Cakir E, Usul H, Baykal S, Yazar U, Karaarslan G, et al. Posterior epidural migration of lumbar disc fragments : report of three cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:E64–E67. [PubMed]
10. Lakshmanan P, Ahuja S, Lyons K, Howes J, Davies PR. Sequestrated lumbar intervertebral disc in the posterior epidural space : a report on two cases and review of the literature. Spine J. 2006;6:583–586. [PubMed]
11. Lichtor T. Posterior epidural migration of extruded lumbar disc. Surg Neurol. 1989;32:311–312. [PubMed]
12. Liu SS, Williams KD, Drayer BP, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VK. Synovial cysts of the lumbosacral spine : diagnosis by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:163–166. [PubMed]
13. Lombardi V. Lumbar spinal block by posterior rotation of anulus fibrosis. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1973;39:642–644. [PubMed]
14. Olmarker K, Blomquist J, Strömberg J, Nannmark U, Thomsen P, Rydevik B. Inflammatogenic properties of nucleus pulposus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:665–669. [PubMed]
15. Robe P, Martin D, Lenelle J, Stevenaert A. Posterior epidural migration of sequestrated lumbar disc fragments : report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:264–266. [PubMed]
16. Sandhu FS, Dillon WP. Spinal epidural abscess : evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:1087–1093. [PubMed]
17. Schellinger D, Manz HJ, Vidic B, Patronas NJ, Deveikis JP, Muraki AS, et al. Disc fragment migration. Radiology. 1990;175:831–836. [PubMed]
18. Sen O, Aydin MV, Erdoğan B, Yildirim T, Caner H. Cauda equina syndrome caused by posterior epidural migration of an extruded lumbar disc fragment. Turk Neurosurg. 2001;11:108–110.
19. Williams AL, Haughton VM, Danials DL, Grogan JP. Differential CT Diagnosis of extruded nucleus pulposus. Radiology. 1983;148:141–148. [PubMed]
20. Wiltse LL, Fonseca AS, Amster J, Dimartino P, Ravessoud FA. Relationship of the dura, Hoffmann's ligaments, Batson's plexus and a fibrovascular membrane lying on the posterior surface of the vertebral bodies and attaching to the deep layer of the posterior longitudinal ligament. An anatomical, radiologic and clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1030–1043. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society are provided here courtesy of The Korean Neurosurgical Society