|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Follicular lymphoma (FL) and the GCB subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) derive from germinal center B-cells1. Targeted re-sequencing studies have revealed mutations in various genes in the NFkB pathway2,3 that contribute to the activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL subtype but, thus far, few GCB-specific mutations have been identified4. Here, we report recurrent somatic mutations affecting the polycomb group oncogene6 EZH2, which encodes a histone methyltransferase responsible for tri-methylating H3K27. After the recent discovery of mutations in the histone H3K27me3 demethylase UTX in several cancer types5, EZH2 is the second histone methyltransferase affected by mutations in cancer. These mutations, which replace a single tyrosine in the SET domain of the EZH2 protein (Y641), occur in 21.7% of GCB DLBCLs, 7.2% of FLs and are absent from ABC DLBCLs. Our data are consistent with the notion that EZH2 proteins with mutated Y641 have reduced enzymatic activity in vitro.
Advances in DNA sequencing technology have recently enabled the characterization of genomes and transcriptomes at sufficient resolution for identification of somatic point mutations7–9. To develop new insight into novel mutations potentially contributing to B-cell Non Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), we used Illumina technology to sequence genomic DNA and RNA purified from a malignant lymph node biopsy obtained from a FL patient (“FL Sample A”)(Methods). FL patient A qualified as a grade 1 FL that co-expressed CD10, BCL2 and BCL6 by immuno-histochemistry. This sample was chosen for sequence analysis because it exhibited an unusually simple karyotype (Supplementary Figure 1), lacking t(14;18)(q32;q21), and other large-scale alterations (Supplementary Figures 2–5; Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). We analyzed the exon sequences of this tumor for mutations in both the genome (WGSS) and transcriptome (WTSS)(Table 1 and Methods). Matched constitutional DNA from the FL patient was sequenced to reveal “germline” sequence variants (Methods). We produced 25.6 aligned gigabases (Gb) from the tumor genomic library, yielding 9.47-fold redundant base coverage on average, and an additional 2.2 Gb of aligned sequence from the WTSS library, yielding 18.86-fold redundant base coverage on average within exons (Table 1; Methods). We focused our analysis on novel changes predicted to affect protein-coding sequence (Methods). Among these variants (Supplementary Table 3), we discovered a mutation affecting exon 15 of the EZH2 gene, which encodes a portion of the EZH2 SET domain. EZH2 is the catalytic component of the PRC2 complex, which is responsible for adding methyl groups to lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27)10, thereby repressing transcription at loci associated with histones bearing tri-methylated H3K27. We established that this mutation, which is predicted to replace Y641 with a histidine, was somatic in nature by confirming its presence in tumor DNA, and absence in constitutional non-tumor DNA (Methods). We also confirmed that the mutation was heterozygous in this patient sample.
To determine EZH2 mutational status in DLBCL samples, we next used WTSS to sequence the transcriptomes of 31 DLBCL patient samples and seven DLBCL cell lines. Based on cell of origin (COO) expression classification11, the primary lymphoma samples were classified as belonging to either the ABC (n=12), GCB (n=15) or unclassifiable subtypes (n=2) (Methods; Supplementary Table 4). Coverage of EZH2 in the WTSS libraries was consistently high, ranging in the patient samples from 5.3-fold to 187-fold redundant base-pair coverage (median 48.7-fold). Coverage of codon 641 ranged from 5-fold to 295-fold (median 46.5-fold; Supplementary Table 4). We identified Y641 mutations in four of these 31 patient samples and four of the cell lines (Table 2). No other mutations in EZH2 were detected and all mutations appeared to be heterozygous. The striking recurrence of these mutations suggested that mutation of Y641 in EZH2 was a common feature of lymphoma. Notably, despite a median base coverage depth of 11.4-fold in the UTX locus, we found no evidence for UTX mutations in these libraries.
We determined the prevalence of Y641 mutations in both FL and DLBCL tumors by Sanger sequencing the exon containing this codon in 251 FL samples, of which 30 had matched DLBCL samples taken at histological transformation and 320 primary DLBCL samples (including the original 31 patient samples)(Supplementary Table 5). This revealed a total of 18 FL and 35 DLBCL samples with heterozygous Y641 mutations. Of note, all Y641 mutations detected by WTSS demonstrated clear evidence for expression of both alleles (Supplementary Table 4). To search for additional sites mutated in this gene, we also sequenced all exons of EZH2 in 24 FL patients (in addition to FL patient A) and found only one example of an EZH2 mutation not affecting Y641 (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 5). This mutation, affecting N635, was found in conjunction with a Y641 mutation and we confirmed that both mutations were in a cis orientation. We confirmed that these mutations were somatic in the 7 FL (including “Sample A”) and 2 DLBCL patients for which germline DNA was available.
To exclude the possibility that such mutations can also occur in non-malignant germinal center B-cells or other types of lymphoma, we sequenced this region of exon 15 in eight CD77+-enriched centroblast samples from reactive tonsils and 23 reactive lymph nodes (a source of normal B-cells) and 80 samples of other lymphoma types using both Sanger sequencing and targeted ultra-deep Illumina re-sequencing (Methods; Supplementary Figure 6; Supplementary Table 6). We also sequenced WTSS libraries generated from two additional normal centroblast samples (Supplementary Table 4). Consistent with our hypothesis that Y641 mutations are unique to malignant B-cells, none of these samples showed evidence for mutations at Y641 or elsewhere within the sequenced region (Table 3). Notably, all of the DLBCL samples with known COO and which were also positive for EZH2 mutations were of the GCB subtype and not the ABC subtype. This revealed a significant enrichment of Y641 mutations among the GCB subtype of DLBCLs (Table 3; n=18/83 GCB vs 0/42 ABC, P = 0.00168, two-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test).
We next assessed the effect various Y641 mutations would have on the structure, and potentially the function, of the EZH2 SET domain by generating a computational model (Supplementary Figure 7) using the crystal structure of the highly conserved MLL1 SET domain12 as the structural template (Methods). Our model indicates that Y641 interacts with the lysine 27 side chain of the H3 histone tail, as has been suggested in other SET domain proteins13. Though no EZH2 SET domain mutations have been reported in humans, detailed mutant phenotypes have been described in Drosophila. A mutation altering the tyrosine orthologous to EZH2 Y641 has been characterized in the Drosophila ortholog E(z) in an allele known as “E(z)1”. Drosophila E(z)1 mutant protein was found to be incapable of tri-methylating H3K27 in vitro14.
We sought to directly determine whether EZH2 with mutated Y641 impacts the catalytic activity of PRC2 in a cell-free methylation assay. Individual clones, each containing one of the four most frequently detected mutations (Figure 1), were first expressed along with the other components of PRC2. PRC2 complexes were purified and tested in vitro for H3K27 tri-methylation activity using ELISA and an antibody specific for H3K27me3 (Methods). The results (Figure 2) indicated that, compared to wild-type EZH2, all four Y641 mutants consistently demonstrated a marked reduction (~7-fold) in their ability to tri-methylate the H3K27 peptide. This biochemical result suggested that the four predominant Y641 variants observed in our sequencing study could confer reduced ability of PRC2 complexes to tri-methylate H3K27 in vivo.
Other reports have suggested that increased abundance of EZH2 mRNA correlates with cancer progression in tissues in which EZH2 expression is normally low or undetectable, such as breast and prostate6,15. However, EZH2 mRNA is known to be abundant in normal germinal center B-cells16, and a conditional knock-out of the mouse EZH2 ortholog indicated that the SET domain is required for early B-cell development, including rearrangement of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) locus17. Given the apparent requirement for EZH2 in germinal center B-cells, it is possible that the mechanism by which EZH2 contributes to lymphomagenesis is distinct from the apparently straightforward increases in EZH2 mRNA abundance observed in breast6 and prostate15 cancers. Expression of both EZH2 and BMI1 (the catalytic component of PRC1) have been linked to the degree of malignancy of B-cell NHL and perturbations in the balance of the quantities of these two proteins has been suggested as an early event in lymphomagenesis18. However, mutation of EZH2 has not, to date, been implicated in B-cell malignancies or any other cancer.
Though the biological mechanism is not known, our findings suggest that EZH2 Y641 mutations, and possibly a reduction in H3K27 tri-methylation, have a role in the pathogenesis of GCB lymphomas. The well-studied Phe/Tyr switch19 site is known to regulate the number of methyl groups a SET domain-containing protein can add without compromising its overall catalytic activity. Although the Y641 residue is distinct from the Phe/Tyr switch site, the result of our in vitro experiment does not rule out the possibility that these mutations may alter the product (or target) specificity of EZH2. Our finding is particularly timely in light of recent studies demonstrating enhanced DNA methylation at PRC2 targets in lymphoma as compared to normal B-cells20,21. H3K27 tri-methylation via PRC2 can be a precursor to DNA methylation and, in some cases, DNA methyltransferase may be physically coupled with PRC222. Hence, Y641 mutations may contribute to the differential DNA methylation that has been observed at polycomb targets in FL20 and DLBCL21.
In conclusion, we identified novel recurrent somatic mutations affecting the EZH2 SET domain and have associated these with FL and DLBCL cases of only the GCB subtype. Our data indicate that mutation of the EZH2 SET domain is among the most frequent genetic events observed in GCB malignancies after t(14;18)(q32;q21). The mutated tyrosine corresponds to a key residue in the active site of the EZH2 protein and, consistent with functional studies of a comparable mutation in the Drosophila E(z) ortholog, we show that PRC2 complexes containing mutated EZH2 protein exhibit reduced H3K27 tri-methylation activity in vitro. We have shown that a wild-type copy of EZH2 is present in all samples with Y641 mutations and have also detected expression of both alleles in the mutant samples profiled by transcriptome sequencing. This, along with the fact that all lymphomas with mutations in EZH2 appear to have a mutation affecting Y641, sets EZH2 apart from the pattern of mutational inactivation seen in the case of UTX, which appears to behave as a tumor suppressor gene5. Aside from the recurrence of inactivating mutations in UTX, EZH2 is the only protein affecting H3K27 methylation status to be identified as a target of somatic mutation in cancer, and the first in which recurrent mutations of the SET domain appear restricted to a specific lymphoma subtype.
Two samples from the initial patient (FL patient A) were utilized. Both had ~70% tumor content based on the co-expression of CD19 and lambda by flow cytometry and were “fresh” frozen at source. The first was taken at the time of diagnosis and was used for WTSS and WGSS. The second was acquired at the time of progression and was flow sorted to >95% purity. It was analyzed by karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the presence of a translocation t(14;18) using the dual color, dual fusion probe. It was also analyzed for copy number alterations by array comparative hybridization (aCGH) and fingerprint profiling26 and for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) by Affymetrix 500K array. All DLBCL samples profiled by WTSS were fresh frozen biopsies having >50% tumor content by flow cytometry. All other specimens used in this study were obtained at the time of diagnosis and were derived from archived fresh frozen tissue or frozen tumor cell suspensions. Germline DNA was obtained from peripheral blood in live patients and from CD19-negative sorted tumor cell suspensions using Miltenyi magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for deceased patients. All lymphoma samples were diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria of 2008 by an expert hematopathologist (R.D.G.). Benign specimens included reactive pediatric tonsils or purified CD77-positive centroblasts sorted from reactive tonsils using Miltenyi beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The tumor specimens were collected as part of a research project approved by the University of British Columbia-British Columbia Cancer Agency Research Ethics Board (BCCA REB) and are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients whose samples were profiled using WTSS or WGSS. Our protocols stipulate that this data will not be released into the public domain but can be made available via a tiered-access mechanism to named investigators of institutions agreeing by a materials transfer agreement to honor the same ethical and privacy principles required by the BCCA REB.
RNA was extracted from a total lymph node section using AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and DNaseI treated. For whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (WTSS/RNA-seq) analysis, we used a modified method similar to the protocol we have previously described7. Briefly, PolyA+ RNA was purified using the MACS mRNA isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), from 5–10ug of DNaseI-treated total RNA as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Double-stranded cDNA was synthesized from the purified polyA+ RNA using the Superscript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and random hexamer primers (Invitrogen) at a concentration of 5μM. The cDNA was fragmented by sonication and a paired-end sequencing library prepared following the Illumina paired-end library preparation protocol (Illumina, Hayward, CA, USA).
Genomic DNA for construction of whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGSS) libraries was prepared from the same biopsy material using the Qiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). DNA quality was assessed by spectrophotometry (260/280 and 260/230) and gel electrophoresis before library construction. DNA was sheared for 10 min using a Sonic Dismembrator 550 with a power setting of “7” in pulses of 30 seconds interspersed with 30 seconds of cooling (Cup Horn, Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada), and analyzed on 8% PAGE gels. The 200–300bp DNA fraction was excised and eluted from the gel slice overnight at 4°C in 300 μl of elution buffer (5:1, LoTE buffer (3 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2 mM EDTA)-7.5 M ammonium acetate), and was purified using a Spin-X Filter Tube (Fisher Scientific), and by ethanol precipitation. WGSS libraries were prepared using a modified paired-end protocol supplied by Illumina Inc. (Illumina, Hayward, USA). This involved DNA end-repair and formation of 3′ Adenosine overhangs using Klenow fragment (3′ to 5′ exo minus) and ligation to Illumina PE adapters (with 5′ overhangs). Adapter-ligated products were purified on QIAquick spin columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and PCR-amplified using Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) and 10 cycles with the PE primer 1.0 and 2.0 (Illumina). PCR products of the desired size range were purified from adapter ligation artifacts using 8% PAGE gels. DNA quality was assessed and quantified using an Agilent DNA 1000 series II assay (Agilent, Santa Clara CA, USA) and Nanodrop 7500 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Wilmington, DE, USA) and DNA was subsequently diluted to 10nM. The final concentration was confirmed using a Quant-iT dsDNA HS assay kit and Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For sequencing, clusters were generated on the Illumina cluster stations using v1 cluster reagents. Paired-end reads were generated using v3 sequencing reagents on the Illumina GAii platform following the manufacturer’s instructions. Image analysis, base-calling and error calibration were performed using v1.0 of Illumina’s Genome analysis pipeline. Paired-end WTSS and WGSS libraries were sequenced to 36, 50 or 76 cycles. The WGSS library comprised a mixture of 13 flow cell lanes of 36-nt reads, 16 lanes of 50-nt reads and 6 lanes of 76-nt reads.
This procedure describes the individual PCR amplification of EZH2 exon 15, indexing of individual amplicons, and subsequent pooling and sequencing. Individual indexes allow the deconvolution of reads deriving from individual samples in multiplexed libraries such that many samples can be concurrently sequenced in the same library. Genomic DNA from individual samples was normalized to 5ng/uL and 5ng of each sample was PCR amplified using Phusion DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) in 96-well format using gene specific primers (Primer EZH2_015R3 and Primer EZH2_015F, Supplementary Table 7) to produce ~300bp amplicons. Hot Start PCR conditions: 98°C, 60s, then 36 cycles (98°C-10s, 60°C-15s, 72°C-30s), final extension 72°C, 5min. Amplicons were cleaned using AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) on a Biomek F/X (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and eluted with 40uL elution buffer EB (QIAGEN, USA). Cleaned amplicons were QC tested on a 1.2% SeaKem LE Agarose gel (Cambrex, East Rutherford, NJ, USA) using 1X TAE buffer. Bands were quantified by the QBit™ Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) high sensitivity assay. Approximately 500ng of each amplicon DNA sample was then phosphorylated and end-repaired in 50uL reactions at room temp, 30min (T4 DNA Pol 5U, DNA Pol I (Klenow) 1U, T4 PNK 100U, dNTP mix 0.4mM (Invitrogen). End-repair reactions were cleaned using AMPure beads and dATP was added to the 3′-ends using Klenow (exo-) 5U and 0.2mM dATP in 1X Klenow Buffer (Invitrogen) with 30-min incubation at 37°C in a Tetrad thermal cycler (MJ Research, USA). DNA was again cleaned on AMPure beads using a Biomek FX. Adapter ligation (10:1 ratio) was completed with 0.03uM Adapter (Multiplexing Adapters 1 and 2, Supplementary Table 7), 100ng DNA, T4 DNA Ligase 5U, 0.2mM ATP, 1X T4 DNA Ligase Buffer (Invitrogen) for 30min @ room temp. Adapter-ligated DNA was cleaned using AMPure beads on a Biomek FX. A selection of DNA samples were quantified on a QBit™ (Invitrogen). Phusion DNA polymerase, 15-cycle indexing enrichment PCR was performed using Primers 1.0 and 2.0 (IDT, USA) and 96 custom indexing primers (indexes shown in Supplementary Table 6). The PCR program was as follows: 98°C for 60s followed by 15 cycles of 98°C, 10s, 65°C, 15s, 72°C, 30s. The PCR products were cleaned using AMPure beads and eluted in 40uL elution buffer EB (QIAGEN, USA). Quality of product was assessed by QC gels: 1.75% SeaKem LE agarose 1X TAE, (0.2uL of every amplicon) and on Bioanalyzer-1000 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). All 96 ~400bp amplicons from each plate were then pooled (15uL of each well) into a separate 1.5mL microfuge tube. Hence, one tube represents a plate of 96 pooled and indexed PCR products from 96 distinct DNA templates. The 400bp DNA size fraction was purified using 8% PAGE gels (1X TAE) and eluted from the gel slice overnight at 4°C in 400 μl of elution buffer (5:1, LoTE buffer (3 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2 mM EDTA)-7.5 M ammonium acetate). Gel pieces were filtered using a Spin-X Filter Tube (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). DNA was precipitated using ethanol and was quantified using an Agilent DNA 1000 series II assay (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara CA, USA) then diluted to 10nM. The final concentration was confirmed using a Quant-iT dsDNA HS assay kit and QBit™ fluorometer (Invitrogen). An individual library was constructed from each indexed sample (comprising amplicons from up to 96 distinct template DNAs). Each of these libraries was sequenced on a single flowcell lane.
All reads were aligned to the human reference genome (hg18) or (for WTSS) to a genome file that has been augmented with a set of all exon-exon junction sequences using the MAQ aligner27 v0.7.1. Candidate single nucleotide variants (SNV) were identified in the aligned genomic sequence reads and the transcriptome (WTSS) reads using an approach similar to one we have previously described7. One key difference in our variant calling in this study is the application of a Bayesian SNV identification algorithm (“SNVmix”) currently under development by our group (version 0.11.7; http://compbio.bccrc.ca/?page_id=204)28. This approach is able to identify SNVs with a minimum coverage of two high quality (Q20) bases. All sites assessed as being polymorphisms (SNPs) were disregarded, including variants matching a position in dbSNP or the personal genomes of Venter29, Watson, the anonymous Asian30 and Yoruban31 individuals. Additionally, all candidate mutations also found in the genomic sequence from this patient’s germline DNA were ignored. For the targeted re-sequencing experiment, coverage was generally greater than 1000x read depth at codon 641. Hence, we used all unambiguously mapped reads spanning this site to determine the percentage of reads with a high quality mismatch (Illumina base quality ≥20). These percentages are reported for each sample in the supplementary information (Supplementary Table 6).
Exon 15 of EZH2 was PCR amplified from genomic DNA using EZH2_ASP_1 and EZH2_ASP_2. Priiming sites for M13 Forward -21 and M13 reverse were added to their 5′ ends to allow direct Sanger sequencing of amplicons. Unless otherwise stated, amplicons were produced from genomic DNA from both tumor and matched normal patient DNA. All capillary traces were analyzed using Mutation Surveyor and all variants were visually inspected to confirm their presence in tumor and absence from germline traces.
The EZH2 SET domain sequence was used to search for the structural template for homology modeling in the Protein Data Bank. The available crystal structure of the MLL1 SET domain (PDB ID 2w5z)12 was identified as the best template (with sequence identities of 39% for the SET domain and no alignment gaps). A three dimensional model of the EZH2 SET domain was constructed via the protein modeling server SWISS-MODEL32. Because MLL1 is a H3K4 binding protein, there was some concern that the target lysine residue of EZH2 (K27) may not reside in the same conformation. Another concern is that the MLL1 crystal structure is in an open conformation and this conformation has reduced methyltransferase activity compared to the closed ones. The conformation change may shift the position of Y641. To confirm these we built alternative models using other structures as templates. We used the H3K9 binding proteins EHMT1 (PDB ID 2RFI), DIM-5 (1PEG), SUV39H2 (2R3A) and G9a (2O8J), as well as the H3K36 binding protein SETD2 (3H6L). The striking overlap of the conserved tyrosine residue corresponding to Y641 confirms that the position of Y641 remains unchanged in all proteins regardless of an open or closed conformation. The co-crystallized H3 peptides in 1PEG and 2RFI helped us confirmed that the conformations of K4 and K9 are quite similar in those models. Therefore, we assume that the K27 in EZH2 will pose a conformation close to that shown in the model.
Mutant constructs were generated using site-directed mutagenesis of the Refseq EZH2 (NM_004456) with an N-terminal His tag. Wild-type EZH2 and each of the four Y641 mutant constructs were co-expressed along with wild-type AEPB2, EED, SUZ12 and RbAp48 in SF9 cells using a baculovirus expression system (pVL1392, cloned using BamHI and EcoRI). Together, these five proteins associate to form an enzymatically active PRC2 complex in vitro. Expression of EZH2 protein from each of the four mutant constructs was confirmed by Western blot and detected using anti-EZH2. Assay plates are coated with biotinylated histone H3 (21-44) peptide. Purified PRC2 was added to the plate along with S-adenosylmethionine (in the assay buffer) to detect enzyme activity. Methylated histone H3 was measured using a highly specific mouse-derived monoclonal antibody, which recognizes only the tri-methylated K27 residue of histone H333 (Active Motif, Catalog Number 39535.). The secondary antibody, which is labeled with Europium, was detected using time-resolved fluorescence (620nm). PRC2 methylase activity of each mutant (and wild-type EZH2) was tested at varying purified PRC2 amounts (between 0 and 200ng).
Total RNA was reversed transcribed (one cycle) and hybridized to U133-2 Plus arrays according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Affymetrix). CEL files were normalized using robust multi-chip analysis (RMA). Cell of origin (COO) was calculated using model scores for ABC and GCB derived from the 185-gene model described by Lenz et al.11 and the Bayesian formula described by Wright et al39.
BAC Array comparative genomic hybridization was performed as previously described40 and did not identify any significant alterations. The tumor DNA was analyzed for large copy number alterations using an Affymetrix 500K SNP array as previously described41 using peripheral blood as a matched normal comparator. The sequencing data was also used to directly infer the presence of large-scale deletions and amplifications. This was accomplished by probabilistic identification of deviations in the proportion of unambiguously mapped reads between the normal and tumor genomic libraries as previously described28. Due to the lower amount of sequence reads from the matched normal tissue, aligned reference reads were first used to define genomic bins of equal coverage containing 200 mapped reads. The sequencing depth of the normal genome provided 684,029 bins with a median size of 3953 bp, representing 2.942 gigabases of the hg18 assembly. A hidden Markov model (HMM) was used to classify and segment continuous regions into five discrete states: copy number loss (HMM 1), neutral (HMM 2), gain (HMM 3), amplification (HMM 4), and high-level amplification (HMM 5) using methodology outlined previously42. All segments and their HMM states are included in Supplementary Table 2 and displayed in Supplementary Figure 5.
This study was funded in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute Office of Cancer Genomics (see below), the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Terry Fox Foundation New Frontiers Program Project Grant (grant no. 016003/grant type 230/project title: Biology of Cancer: Follicular Lymphoma as a Model of Cancer Progression) and Genome Canada/Genome BC Grant Competition III (project title: High Resolution Analysis of Follicular Lymphoma Genomes) to J.M.C., M.A.M., R.D.G. and D.E.H. and was supported by The Terry Fox Foundation (grant no. 019001). In addition, N.A.J. is a research fellow of the Terry Fox Foundation through an award from the NCIC (019005) and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR) (ST-PDF-01793). M.A.M. is a Terry Fox Young Investigator and a Michael Smith Senior Research Scholar. A.J.M. is supported by a Fellowship Award from The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. R.D.M. is a Vanier Scholar (Canadian Institutes for Health Research) and is also supported by a MSFHR senior graduate fellowship. The laboratory work for this study was undertaken at the Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre and the Centre for Translational and Applied Genomics, a program of the Provincial Health Services Authority Laboratories. The authors thank the BC Cancer Foundation and the Lion’s Club International for their support. The authors gratefully acknowledge D. Gerhard for helpful discussions. Special thanks to C. Suragh and A. Drobnies for expert project management assistance. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract no. NO1-CO-12400. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government.
Author Contributions: M.A.M., R.D.G., D.E.H., and J.M.C. conceived of the study and led the design of the experiments. R.D.M. performed the WGSS and WTSS analysis, produced Figures 1 and and22 and, with M.A.M., wrote the manuscript. N.A.J. prepared the samples, performed sample sorting and COO analysis and contributed to the text. O.G. and R.D.M. analyzed gene expression data. T.M.S., A.J.M. and J.E.P. performed sequence validation experiments and visual inspection of capillary sequence data. D.S. and M.M. constructed multiplexed libraries for deep re-sequencing of EZH2. H.Z., M.K., P.S., J.F.C., D.Y. and M.T. conducted enzymatic assays. I.B. performed statistical analysis and contributed to the manuscript. J.A. and S.J. produced the model for EZH2 and contributed to the manuscript. M.B. and B.W. prepared samples and performed FACS. F.K. and R.K.H. validated expression findings in the RNA. A.D., H.Q., R.C. and S.S. performed copy number analysis. A.T., Y.Z., R.H., M.H. and R.M. produced the sequencing libraries and performed the sequencing. R.V. processed raw sequencing data. R.G. identified candidate mutations. J.S., M.H., S.A. conceived of experiments and contributed to the text.