PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of procascamcLink to Publisher's site
 
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993 : 844–848.
PMCID: PMC2850688

A multimedia preference-assessment tool for functional outcomes.

Abstract

Functional outcomes of clinical trials are often reported as number of dependencies in activities of daily living (ADLs). Quality-weighting for the ADLs has not been reported. We designed and pilot-tested ADLIB (ADL Index Builder), a multimedia computer program, that presents ADL health states to subjects and elicits from subjects a rating for the quality of life of each health state. Subjects, who were patients over age 50 without previous computer experience, found the program easy to use. Health care professionals specializing in geriatrics confirmed that the ADL presentations used in the program are in accord with typical practice in scoring ADLs. We plan to use the program to obtain population-based preference ratings that can be used to assess efficacy of clinical trials and to provide quality-weights for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):559–575. [PubMed]
  • Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv Res. 1988 Jun;23(2):203–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cadman D, Goldsmith C. Construction of social value or utility-based health indices: the usefulness of factorial experimental design plans. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(8):643–651. [PubMed]
  • Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1–30. [PubMed]
  • Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--I: Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(4):345–354. [PubMed]
  • McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 22;305(17):982–987. [PubMed]
  • Hadorn DC, Hays RD, Uebersax J, Hauber T. Improving task comprehension in the measurement of health state preferences. A trial of informational cartoon figures and a paired-comparison task. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):233–243. [PubMed]
  • Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137–145. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association