Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procascamcLink to Publisher's site
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993 : 626–630.
PMCID: PMC2850652

Comparing contents of a knowledge base to traditional information sources.


Physicians rely on the medical literature as a major source of medical knowledge and data. The medical literature, however, is continually evolving and represents different sources at different levels of coverage and detail. The recent development of computerized medical knowledge bases has added a new form of information that can potentially be used to address the practicing physician's information needs. To understand how the information from various sources differs, we compared the description of a disease found in the QMR knowledge base to those found in two general internal medicine textbooks and two specialized nephrology textbooks. The study shows both differences in coverage and differences in the level of detail. Textbooks contain information about pathophysiology and therapy that is not present in the diagnostic knowledge base. The knowledge base contains a more detailed description of the associated findings, more quantitative information, and a greater number of references to peer-reviewed medical articles. The study demonstrates that computerized knowledge bases, if properly constructed, may be able to provide clinicians with a useful new source of medical knowledge that is complementary to existing sources.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (769K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Jelovsek FR, Rittwage J, Pearse WH, Visscher HC. Information management needs of the obstetrician-gynecologist--a survey. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;73(3 Pt 1):395–399. [PubMed]
  • Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld BH, Miller RA. Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 1;114(7):576–581. [PubMed]
  • Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Osheroff JA, Miller RA. Expanding the concept of medical information: an observational study of physicians' information needs. Comput Biomed Res. 1992 Apr;25(2):181–200. [PubMed]
  • Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596–599. [PubMed]
  • Timpka T, Arborelius E. The GP's dilemmas: a study of knowledge need and use during health care consultations. Methods Inf Med. 1990 Jan;29(1):23–29. [PubMed]
  • Kong A, Barnett GO, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 18;315(12):740–744. [PubMed]
  • Bernstein LM, Siegel ER, Goldstein CM. The hepatitis knowledge base. A prototype information transfer system. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jul;93(1 Pt 2):169–181. [PubMed]
  • Miller RA, Pople HE, Jr, Myers JD. Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 19;307(8):468–476. [PubMed]
  • Masarie FE, Jr, Miller RA, Myers JD. INTERNIST-I properties: representing common sense and good medical practice in a computerized medical knowledge base. Comput Biomed Res. 1985 Oct;18(5):458–479. [PubMed]
  • Wyatt J. Use and sources of medical knowledge. Lancet. 1991 Nov 30;338(8779):1368–1373. [PubMed]
  • Audet AM, Greenfield S, Field M. Medical practice guidelines: current activities and future directions. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 1;113(9):709–714. [PubMed]
  • Miller RA, Giuse NB. Medical knowledge bases. Acad Med. 1991 Jan;66(1):15–17. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association