Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 5.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2849742

The Higher Structure of Chromatin in the LCR of the β-Globin Locus Changes during Development


The β-globin locus control region (LCR) is able to enhance the expression of all globin genes throughout the course of development. However, the chromatin structure of the LCR at the different developmental stages is not well defined. We report DNase I and micrococcal nuclease hypersensitivity, chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses for histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, and 3C (chromatin conformation capture) assays of the normal and mutant β-globin loci, which demonstrate that nucleosomes at the DNase I hypersensitive sites of the LCR could be either depleted or retained depending on the stages of development. Furthermore, MNase sensitivity and 3C assays suggest that the LCR chromatin is more open in embryonic erythroblasts than in definitive erythroblasts at the primary- and secondary-structure levels; however, the LCR chromatin is packaged more tightly in embryonic erythroblasts than in definitive erythroblasts at the tertiary chromatin level. Our study provides the first evidence that the occupancy of nucleosomes at a DNase I hypersensitive site is a developmental stage-related event and that embryonic and adult cells possess distinct chromatin structures of the LCR.

Keywords: DNase I hypersensitivity, histones, nucleosomes, chromatin structure, 30-nm fiber


Locus control regions (LCRs) are operationally defined by their ability to enhance the expression of linked genes to physiological levels in a tissue-specific and copy-number-dependent manner at ectopic chromatin sites.14 The first LCR, discovered in the human β-globin locus,5 spans about 16 kb and contains five DNase I hypersensitive sites (HSs 1–5). Each HS encompasses an array of binding motifs of erythroid-specific and ubiquitous transacting factors/cofactors, chromatin remodeling complexes, RNA polymerase II and other transcription factors. Recruitment of these factors to HSs in erythroid cells is thought to be the molecular basis of enhancer activity of the LCR and of the enhancer activity of individual HSs (mainly HSs 2–4). The intact LCR is capable of augmenting in vivo transcription of the cognate genes by 100- to 1000-fold. While the enhancer activity of the LCR is derived from the HS-recruited trans-acting factors, it is unknown how these factors make the LCR so powerful that it can function at a suppressive chromatin site.6 It has been speculated that the LCR has a specific chromatin structure.7 The human β-globin LCR interacts either with the γ- or with the β-globin gene at a given time, although both the genes are expressed in the tissue.7 The fact that the LCR contains several HSs but only activates one gene at a time suggests that it may function as a single entity; this entity has been termed the LCR “holocomplex.”7,8 Results of HS deletions in transgenic mice are in agreement with this notion.8,9 Several models of the LCR holocomplex have been proposed on the basis of functional studies;8,10 however, the structure of the LCR holocomplex remains to be determined.

How the chromatin structure of the LCR modulates its enhancer activity is not well understood. Chromatin conformation could be divided into three hierarchical levels. 11 The “beads-on-a-string” would represent the primary structure. It is a 10-nm chromatin fiber consisting of an array of nucleosomes connected by linker DNAs. A typical nucleosome comprises 146 bp of DNA wrapped 1.65 times around an octamer containing two copies of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. The folded nucleosomal array would define the secondary structure, which is often referred to as 30-nm fiber. The structure and in vivo existence of a 30-nm fiber are still being debated.12 The crystal analysis of a tetranucleosome argues that the underlying structure of the 30-nm fiber is a zigzag two-start helix.13 The tertiary structure would refer to the folding of the 30-nm fiber. The structure beyond the 30-nm fiber is elusive. The establishment of long-distance interactions in the 30-nm fiber could be considered as one of the subtypes of such higher structure.

The LCR enhances the expression of all globin genes regardless of their developmental specificity, raising the possibility that it has a developmentally stable chromatin structure. On the other hand, the response of the LCR to mutations of the γ-globin gene promoter depends on the developmental stage of the erythroid cells.1416 Differences between the LCR enhancer activity in embryonic and adult erythroblasts are also reflected in the finding that the LCR can drive the mouse heat shock protein 68 promoter in embryonic but not in adult erythroblasts.17 We speculate that the differences in LCR function between embryonic and adult stages of development originate from differences in LCR structure.

To investigate the possible structural changes of the LCR during development, we studied the chromatin structure of the wild-type LCR and subsequently evaluated the consequences when the LCR structure is perturbed by deletions of one of its DNase I hypersensitive sites (HS3). We found that nucleosomes at the HSs of the LCR are depleted in the embryonic stage of development, while they are retained at a regular level in definitive erythroid cells. The density of histone acetylation per histone at HSs is greater in the embryonic than in the adult erythroblast; the general accessibility of the LCR is greater in the embryonic stage compared to that of the adult erythroblasts; and the spatial proximity of the HSs of the LCR is closer in the embryonic stage relative to that of the adult erythroblasts. We propose that these differences result in distinct chromatin conformations at the 30-nm fiber level and that they are responsible for the different globin gene expression phenotypes of the LCR mutations.


Nucleosome occupancy at HSs of the human and murine β-globin LCR is developmental stage specific

To study whether nucleosome occupancy of the β-globin LCR is independent of developmental stages, we measured the occurrence of histone H3 by ChIP in embryonic and adult erythroblasts of transgenic mice carrying a YAC construct containing the wild-type human β-globin locus. We found that the amount of histone H3 at all HSs (HSs 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1) of the LCR was reduced in the yolk sac (Fig. 1a, right). These results were expected, as strong evidence supports the notion that the nucleosomes are usually depleted at an HS. However, we found that in the adult erythroblasts, histone H3 in the HSs was maintained at a level similar to that of the amylase gene, which presumably has a regular nucleosome organization (Fig. 1a, left). The differences in histone H3 binding at the HSs between the embryonic and definitive stages were statistically significant. The levels of histone H3 in the intervening regions between HSs (between HSs 4 and 3, 3 and 2, 2 and 1, and HS1 and the ε gene) were similar to those of the control regardless of developmental stage (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
Occurrences of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 in the human transgenic and the mouse endogenous β-globin loci. Bindings of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 were measured by ChIP assay using the specific antibodies. (a) Comparison of histone H3 amounts ...

The finding that histone H3 was not depleted at the HSs in definitive erythroblasts was unexpected. To ensure that the histone H3 measurements truly represented the level of nucleosomes, we estimated other three nucleosome components. Figure 1c shows the levels of histones H2A, H2B, and H4 in seven locations of the LCR in adult erythroblasts including four HSs and three intervening regions between the HSs. The results demonstrate that each type of histones is evenly distributed across the LCR from HS1 to HS4, and no meaningful differences were detected between the HS and the intervening regions.

We wondered whether the differences in nucleosome organization in the LCR at the two developmental stages were limited to the human β-globin locus transferred into the mouse genome or whether it also was a property of the endogenous murine β locus. To address this question, we estimated histone contents in the mouse globin locus. We found that all the five intervening regions of the LCR were occupied by normal amounts of histone H3 in either embryonic or adult erythroblasts (Fig. 1e). However, we found that while the HSs contained normal amounts of histone H3 in adult erythroblasts, a significantly reduced amount of histone H3 was detected at the HSs in embryonic erythroblasts (Fig. 1d). When the measurements were extended to histones H2A, H2B, or H4, we found that, similarly to the human LCR, each type of histones was evenly distributed across the HSs and the intervening regions in adult erythroblasts (Fig. 1f). These results indicate that in adult erythroblasts, both the endogenous mouse and the transgenic human LCRs are composed of a regular array of nucleosomes, which is not interrupted by the occurrences of the HSs. In contrast, in embryonic erythroblasts, the continuity of nucleosomes is interrupted by HSs.

The degree of acetylation per histone is greater in embryonic than in adult erythroblasts

To evaluate whether the level of histone acetylation in the LCR also changes during development, we measured the general acetylation of histone H3 in embryonic and definitive erythroblasts. We found that the level of histone acetylation in the LCR region was development independent. The HSs of the LCR were acetylated to a similar level both in embryonic and in adult erythroblasts (Fig. 2). However, it is worthwhile to point out that while the levels of histone acetylation at HSs of the LCR were similar at both stages, the degree of acetylation per histone was 1.5- to 2-fold greater in the embryonic than in the adult stage due to the depletion of nucleosomes in these sites in embryonic erythroblasts. On the other hand, as expected, histone acetylation of the globin genes correlated to the developmental stage related gene transcription. For instance, the β and δ genes were predominantly expressed in adult erythroblasts; correspondingly, two peaks of histone acetylation appeared in the β and δ gene regions (Fig. 4). Similarly, the peaks of histone acetylation in the yolk sac were located in the ε- and γ-globin genes.

Fig. 2
The profiles of histone H3 acetylation in the β-globin locus in embryonic and adult erythroblasts. The level of histone H3 at K9 and K14 acetylation in the β-globin locus was measured in embryonic and adult erythroblasts by ChIP assay. ...
Fig. 4
Developmental-stage-associated changes in the proximity between HSs of the LCR. 3C assay was employed to estimate the proximity between HS5 and HS1 and between HS 4 and 2 in embryonic and fetal erythroblasts. The asterisks indicate that the difference ...

Chromatin accessibility of the LCR is distinct in embryonic and adult erythroblasts

The findings described above suggest that the chromatin structure of the LCR may have different characteristics at different developmental stages. We employed a semiquantitative MNase sensitivity assay to evaluate this difference. At low concentrations, MNase preferentially cuts at the linker DNA; however, at high concentrations it preferentially cuts at open chromatin, and HSs created by DNase I or MNase perfectly overlap (Yin et al., unpublished results). The assay was performed on the mouse endogenous β-globin locus. MNase digestions were carried out in the nuclei of the mouse yolk sac and adult spleen with different enzyme concentrations and the remaining DNA was quantified by real-time PCR. The rapidity of the decrease in the amount of the DNA as enzyme concentrations increased reflected the nuclease sensitivity. To monitor the comparability of the digestion conditions between the two mouse tissues, we added human Jurkat cells into the yolk sac and spleen erythroblast samples prior to digestion.18 If the kinetics of nuclease cleavage of the external human genes is identical in two tissues, the data sets of digestion kinetics in the endogenous locus should also be comparable between these tissues. As shown in Fig. 3a and b, the kinetics of the human GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) gene and of a region next to the human 3′HS1 were identical in the yolk sac and adult spleen, suggesting that the experimental conditions in the two tissues were comparable. To further confirm the validity of this assay, we evaluated several endogenous regions whose sensitivities were predictable. We tested a region in mouse chromosome 1, which was in closed conformation, and its histones were barely acetylated (W. Yin and Q. Li, unpublished data). We found that the rapidity of DNA decrease of this region was slow, but identical in the two tissues (Fig. 3c). On the other hand, the mouse εy gene promoter was greatly susceptible to MNase digestion in the yolk sac, where the gene was expressed at a high level, whereas it was resistant in the adult erythroblasts of the spleen, where the gene was silenced (Fig. 3d), demonstrating that this assay can clearly distinguish the open conformation from the closed one. Collectively, the results demonstrated that the procedure can be employed to semiquantitatively detect chromatin openness and for comparison between different tissues.

Fig. 3
Comparison of MNase sensitivity of the mouse β-globin locus between embryonic and adult erythroblasts. Schematic illustration of the mouse β-globin locus is shown in the line drawing. The εy-and βH1-globin genes are expressed ...

The chromatin accessibility of five HSs and two intervening regions of the mouse LCR were evaluated in the yolk sac and spleen. As expected, the HSs (Fig. 3e–i) were more sensitive than the intervening regions (Fig. 3j and k). An unexpected feature was that in general, the LCR of the embryonic erythroblasts was more sensitive than that in the adult erythroblasts. This increased accessibility was characteristic of almost all the regions of the LCR. Another aspect was that each individual site was characterized by a specific accessibility. For example, among all HSs, HSs 2 and 3 were the most accessible. It should be pointed out that while the intervening regions of HS3/2 and HS2/1 (Fig. 3j and k) were relatively resistant to nuclease digestion, these regions still were more sensitive in comparison to the chromosome 1 region (Fig. 3c), suggesting that the intervening regions of the LCR were partially open in erythroid cells.

Collectively, the results suggest that as a whole, the LCR chromatin in embryonic erythroblasts is more sensitive than that in adult cells. This difference is small as measured by MNase sensitivity assay, but consistent. Differences in nuclease sensitivity reflect changes in chromatin conformation at the primary or secondary or both structure levels. Thus, we conclude that at the primary and/or secondary structural levels, the LCR in embryonic erythroblasts is more loosely packaged than that in adult erythroblasts.

Proximity between HSs of the LCR changes during development

It is unknown whether the developmental stage-related differences in nucleosome occupancy, the density of histone acetylation, and the degree of MNase sensitivity could also affect the higher chromatin structure of the LCR. We compared interaction frequencies between HSs of the human LCR in transgenic mice at different developmental stages by 3C assay. We found that the interaction frequency between HS1 and HS5 or HS2 and HS4 was greater in embryonic than in definitive erythroid cells (Fig. 4). The differences were statistically significant. These results suggest that the spatial proximity between the HSs of the LCR are closer in embryonic than in fetal erythroblasts.

The LCR responds differently to the HS mutations at different developmental stages

To investigate whether the distinct chromatin structure of the LCR has functional relevance, we studied two LCR mutants, which were previously produced in βYAC transgenic mice in our laboratory.1921 One is the HS3 core deletion (234 bp), which eliminates almost all known binding motifs of the HS site; the second is a deletion that removes a 2.3-kb segment encompassing the HS3 core and the flanking sequences. These two mutations had different impacts on the expression of the globin genes. The 2.3-kb HS deletion moderately reduced expression of the ε gene in the yolk sac and had no effect on expression of the γ and β genes in all stages of development. In contrast, the HS core deletion abolished expression of the ε gene in the yolk sac and disrupted expression of the γ gene in the fetal liver, and the β gene expression was reduced and subjected to the positions of integration.

We first estimated the effects of these deletions on HS formation at different developmental stages. Figure 5B, a–d was the wild-type control showing the formation of HSs 1–5 in embryonic and in fetal erythroblasts. We found that the 2.3-kb HS3 deletion did not disrupt the formation of these HSs in embryonic and fetal erythroblasts (Fig. 5B, i–l). However, the HS core deletion disrupted the formation of HSs 1–5 in the fetal liver (Fig. 5B, e and f), but did not in the yolk sac (Fig. 5B, g and h). These results suggest that while the different HS3 mutations differently affect gene expression, they also differently alter the conformation of the LCR.

Fig. 5
Effects of the HS3 core and 2.3-kb HS3 deletions on the chromatin structure of the LCR. (a) Comparison of the effects of ΔHS3c and ΔHS3 on the proximity between 5HS5 and 5′HS1 and between5′HS4 and 5′HS2 (a) in the ...

3C analysis showed that in the yolk sac, the interaction frequency between HS5 and HS1 or HS4 and HS2 was not affected by either the HS3 or the HS3 core deletion (Fig. 5A-a), while in definitive erythroblasts of the fetal liver, the HS3 core deletion decreased the interaction frequency. In contrast, the 2.3-kb HS3 deletion increased the interaction frequencies between HS4 and HS1 and HS4 and HS2 (Fig. 5A-b). The increase apparently reflected the shortened distance between these HSs caused by the 2.3-kb deletion.

We evaluated the effects of the HS3 deletions on histone acetylation at different stages of development. The level of histone H3 acetylation was not affected by the HS3 core or the 2.3-kb deletion in embryonic erythroblasts (Fig. 5C). However, in adult erythroblasts, as reported previously,10 the HS3 core deletion disrupted histone acetylation of the LCR, while the 2.3-kb HS deletion did not. Thus, in the embryonic stage, neither the 2.3-kb nor the core HS3 deletion affects histone acetylation, whereas in the fetal and adult stages, histone acetylation was disrupted by the core HS3 deletion but not by the 2.3-kb HS3 deletion.

Finally, we asked if the HS3 deletions could affect the nucleosome occupancy of the LCR. We found that the 2.3-kb HS3 or HS3 core deletions did not change the occupancies of histones H3 or H4 in the HSs and in the intervening regions between HSs in adult erythroblasts (Fig. 5D, a and b). In embryonic erythroblasts, the histone depletion was also not affected either by the HS core or by the 2.3-kb HS deletion (data not shown). Thus, the status of histone occupancy of the LCR cannot be altered by these HS3 mutations either in embryonic or in adult erythroblasts.

Together, our results suggest that the two different HS3 deletions discriminately influence the LCR structure, which coincides with the special effects of these mutants on the expression of the globin genes.


This study demonstrates that the wild-type β-globin LCR carries distinct chromatin structures at different stages of development either in the transgenic or in the endogenous settings. The different properties include histone occupancy and density of histone acetylation at HSs, general chromatin accessibility, and the spatial proximity between HSs. Studies on the two types of HS3 deletions suggest that these mutations, which differently affect the expression of the globin genes, also differently alter the conformation of the LCR at a different stage of development. Hence, the developmental stage-related differences in chromatin structure may have functional consequence.

A wildly accepted notion is that the structure and function of an LCR are unchanged during development and differentiation. This notion is supported by several observations. For example, the HSs of the β-globin LCR are indistinguishably formed in embryonic and adult erythroid cells, and the LCR is able to enhance the expression of the different cognate globin genes throughout the entire course of development.22 However, this notion has been challenged by functional studies that showed that the β-globin LCR seems to behave differently in different developmental stages. As mentioned earlier, the LCR could drive the mouse heat shock protein 68 promoter in embryonic but not in adult erythroblasts.17 This finding could be explained if the enhancer activity of the LCR is more powerful in embryonic than in adult erythroblasts. This notion is supported by additional observations that demonstrate that when an essential promoter element (CACCC, CCAAT, or TATA) of the γ-globin gene is disrupted, the expression of this gene is not affected in embryonic erythroid cells, but it is abolished in adult erythroid cells.1416 As the LCR is able to drive deficient γ promoter to high levels of expression at the embryonic stage, but cannot do so in the adult stage, it seems likely that the enhancer activity of the LCR is more powerful in the embryonic compared to the adult erythroid cells. It is, however, still unknown whether these functional differences associate with changes in the conformational structure of the LCR.

One approach used for delineation of the relationships between structure and function of the LCR is to perturb the LCR structure and evaluate the functional consequences of the structural changes. Each HS of the LCR has been studied by deletion mutations in transgenic mice carrying the human β-locus, and the functional consequence of these mutations have been reported by several laboratories.6,8,9,19,20,2326 The phenotypes of HS deletions of the endogenous murine β-globin locus have also been defined.24,25,27,28 Results of these studies are summarized in Table 1. In general, the severity of an HS deletion in the LCR inversely correlates with the size of the deletion in the setting of human β-globin transgenes. Thus, an HS core deletion usually results in a more severe perturbation on globin gene expression in comparison with larger deletion of the same HS. In addition, the effects are more profound in adult than in embryonic erythroblasts. These conclusions, however, are not consistent with the results obtained in the endogenous mouse β-globin locus setting. Thus, there were no significant differences between the phenotypes of a 0.33-kb deletion of the murine HS2 core and of a 1.1-kb deletion of the murine HS2, both done by homologous recombination in the endogenous mouse β-globin locus.25,28 It is worthwhile to note that similar differences between the phenotypes of HS mutations in the transgenic and endogenous loci have been reported for the α-globin locus. The element HS-40 of the human α-globin locus accounts for the majority of enhancer activity of the upstream regulatory region29 of that locus. Removal of mouse HS-26, which is equivalent to the human HS-40, has only moderate effects on expression of the mouse α-globin genes.30 In contrast, deletion of the HS-40 in a mouse humanized” in the α-globin locus, in which the mouse α locus has been replaced with its human counterpart, results in abolishment of the α-globin gene expression, thus mimicking the phenotype of HS-40 deletion in patients with α-thalassemia.31 The differences in the effect of deletions in the endogenous and transgenic β-globin loci could be resolved by reproducing the deletions in mice carrying a humanized β-globin locus.

Table 1
Effects of the HS deletions of the LCR on globin gene expression

The link between chromatin structure and function of the LCR could become perceptible if we assume that the enhancer activity of the LCR associates with the sum of trans-activating factors recruited by each HS, and the final concentration is influenced by relative distances between the HSs. It has been proposed that the chromatin of the β-globin locus is seemingly decondensed to the 30-nm fiber level in erythroid cells.32 The 30-nm fiber of the LCR is bent to fit into the nucleus, and this forces the HSs to come closer to each other (Fig. 6a and b, left). Histones at the HSs are acetylated, resulting in an increase in the flexibility of chromatin,33 which would further bring the HSs closer to each other (Fig. 6a and b, right). Since the degree of acetylation per histone is greater in the embryonic than in the adult stage, the LCR chromatin could be folded into a tighter structure in embryonic than in adult erythroblasts (compare a with b, Fig. 6). This theoretical consideration is supported by the experimental results, which demonstrated that the spatial proximity between HSs 5 and 1 or 4 and 2 of the LCR is greater in embryonic erythroblasts compared to the spatial proximity of the same HSs in the definitive erythroblasts (Fig. 4). This structure could explain the observation that the enhancer activity of the LCR would be stronger in embryonic than in adult erythroblasts. This proposed structure predicts that the effect of a HS deletion on the expression of the globin genes would be a deletion size-dependent phenomenon (compare c with d, Fig. 6). This prediction is supported by the fact that the HS3 core deletion has more profound effects on globin gene expression than the 2.3-kb HS3 deletion.

Fig. 6
The putative 30-nm fiber of the LCR in a simplified form of the two-start zigzag model. The purple balls represent nucleosome cores, and the green line indicates linkers between nucleosomes. The drawings represent a segment of the LCR encompassing HSs ...

It is broadly noted, but with unclear reasons, that the phenotypes of the HS2 deletion in the endogenous mouse and transgenic human β-globin loci were strikingly different. The model proposed here might provide a partial answer. This model predicts that changes in the distance between HSs will alter the strength of enhancer activity of the LCR. The distances between HS2 and HS3 and between HS3 and HS4 are different in the mouse and human β-globin loci,34,35 and the sizes of deletions used in different laboratories were not identical. Based on the model, thus, one should not anticipate an identical phenotype resulting from the HS2 deletion in the mouse and human loci.

Materials and Methods

Transgenic mouse models

The production of transgenic mice carrying the wild-type, 2.3-kb HS3, or 234-bp HS3 core deletion βYAC constructs was described previously.19,20 Eleven days postcoitum (dpc), yolk sacs or 14 dpc fetal livers were collected from timed-breeding human βYAC transgenic mice according to the standard procedures. Adult spleens were prepared from 10- to 12-week-old βYAC transgenic mice 4 days after onset of phenylhydrazine-induced hemolytic anemia. More than 85% of cells in the single-cell suspensions of the yolk sac, fetal liver, or phenylhydrazine-treated spleen were erythroblasts as measured by benzene staining. The animal studies were carried out according to procedures approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Washington.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were carried out as described previously.10 Rabbit polyclonal anti-acetyl-histone H3K9, 14 (06-599) was purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA). Anti-histone H3, H4, H2A, and H2B (ab1791, ab31827, ab18255, and ab1790) antibodies were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Immunoprecipitations (IPs) were performed at least three times. All data for ChIP were expressed as a ratio of the PCR readings of a given primer set in IP and input DNAs over an IP/input ratio of a control gene, and the standard deviation was calculated.

Micrococcal nuclease sensitivity assay

Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) was purchased from Worthington Biochemical (Lakewood, NJ). Nuclei preparation from the single-cell suspension and MNase digestion were performed as described,36 with modifications. Mainly, Jurkat cells were added to the mouse yolk sac or spleen prior to MNase digestion. Instead of Southern blot hybridization, the digested DNA was quantitated by real-time PCR. The retained DNA amounts at five different MNase concentrations were compared to the undigested starting sample, respectively.

Quantitative PCR

Real-time quantitative PCR was performed on Opticon 2 (MJ Research, Watertown, MA) or LightCycler (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) PCR machines. PCR reactions were performed using SYBR Green master mix according to the manufacturer's instructions (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). PCR primers were designed using Primer 3 software; primer sequences are available on request.

Chromosome conformation capture assay

We performed chromosome conformation capture (3C) assays according to the protocol kindly provided by de Laat with slight modifications. Briefly, the single-cell suspension was cross-linked with 1% (v/v) formaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. The cross-linked DNA was digested overnight with HindIII restriction enzyme and DNA fragments were ligated with T4 ligase at 16 °C overnight (14–16 h). The ligated 3C DNA was purified by extraction with phenol/chloroform and precipitation with ethanol. The 3C products were quantitated by real-time PCR and a mix of 3C products of two BACs encompassing the human β-globin locus and the Ercc gene, respectively, as standard DNA. The ligation frequencies between the site pairs in the globin locus were expressed as percentage of that of the mouse Ercc3 gene.3739 All data points were generated from an average of three to five different experiments performed by different persons.

DNase I hypersensitivity assay

DNase I was purchased from Roche. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from 11 dpc yolk sac or 14 dpc fetal livers of human βYAC transgenic mice. Isolation of nuclei, DNase I digestion, and Southern blot hybridization were performed as described previously.10 The genomic DNA was digested with NdeI and hybridized by a 0.7-kb probe (coordinates: Ch 11: 5,265,816-5,265,106, hg16) to detect HSs 1, 2, and 3. Restriction enzyme MfeI and a 0.6-kb probe (5,264,760–5,264,168) were used for detection of HSs 3, 4, and 5.


We thank P. Navas and K. Peterson for transgenic mouse lines. This research was supported by NIH grants DK61805 and HL73439 (to Q.L.) and DK45365 (to G.S.).

Abbreviations used

locus control region
hypersensitive site
chromatin immunoprecipitation
micrococcal nuclease
chromosome conformation capture.


1. Grosveld F. Activation by locus control regions? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999;9:152–157. [PubMed]
2. Li Q, Peterson KR, Fang X, Stamatoyannopoulos G. Locus control regions. Blood. 2002;100:3077–3086. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Felsenfeld G, Groudine M. Controlling the double helix. Nature. 2003;421:448–453. [PubMed]
4. Engel JD, Tanimoto K. Looping, linking, and chromatin activity: new insights into beta-globin locus regulation. Cell. 2000;100:499–502. [PubMed]
5. Grosveld F, van Assendelft GB, Greaves DR, Kollias G. Position-independent, high-level expression of the human beta-globin gene in transgenic mice. Cell. 1987;51:975–985. [PubMed]
6. Milot E, Strouboulis J, Trimborn T, Wijgerde M, de Boer E, Langeveld A, et al. Heterochromatin effects on the frequency and duration of LCR-mediated gene transcription. Cell. 1996;87:105–114. [PubMed]
7. Wijgerde M, Grosveld F, Fraser P. Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo. Nature. 1995;377:209–213. [PubMed]
8. Bungert J, Tanimoto K, Patel S, Liu Q, Fear M, Engel JD. Hypersensitive site 2 specifies a unique function within the human beta-globin locus control region to stimulate globin gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999;19:3062–3072. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Bungert J, Dave U, Lim KC, Lieuw KH, Shavit JA, Liu Q, Engel JD. Synergistic regulation of human beta-globin gene switching by locus control region elements HS3 and HS4. Genes Dev. 1995;9:3083–3096. [PubMed]
10. Fang X, Sun J, Xiang P, Yu M, Navas PA, Peterson KR, et al. Synergistic and additive properties of the beta-globin locus control region (LCR) revealed by 5′HS3 deletion mutations: implication for LCR chromatin architecture. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:7033–7041. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Woodcock CL, Dimitrov S. Higher-order structure of chromatin and chromosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001;11:130–135. [PubMed]
12. Tremethick DJ. Higher-order structures of chromatin: the elusive 30 nm fiber. Cell. 2007;128:651–654. [PubMed]
13. Schalch T, Duda S, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. X-ray structure of a tetranucleosome and its implications for the chromatin fibre. Nature. 2005;436:138–141. [PubMed]
14. Duan ZJ, Fang X, Rohde A, Han H, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Li Q. Developmental specificity of recruitment of TBP to the TATA box of the human gamma-globin gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:5509–5514. [PubMed]
15. Fang X, Han H, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Li Q. Developmentally specific role of the CCAAT box in regulation of human gamma-globin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:5444–5449. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Li Q, Fang X, Olave I, Han H, Yu M, Xiang P, Stamatoyannopoulos G. Transcriptional potential of the gamma-globin gene is dependent on the CACCC box in a developmental stage-specific manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:3909–3916. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Tewari R, Gillemans N, Harper A, Wijgerde M, Zafarana G, Drabek D, et al. The human beta-globin locus control region confers an early embryonic erythroid-specific expression pattern to a basic promoter driving the bacterial lacZ gene. Development. 1996;122:3991–3999. [PubMed]
18. Yin W, Barkess G, Fang X, Xiang P, Cao H, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Li Q. Histone acetylation at the human beta-globin locus changes with developmental age. Blood. 2007;110:4101–4107. [PubMed]
19. Navas PA, Peterson KR, Li Q, Skarpidi E, Rohde A, Shaw SE, et al. Developmental specificity of the interaction between the locus control region and embryonic or fetal globin genes in transgenic mice with an HS3 core deletion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;18:4188–4196. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Peterson KR, Clegg CH, Navas PA, Norton EJ, Kimbrough TG, Stamatoyannopoulos G. Effect of deletion of 5′HS3 or 5′HS2 of the human beta-globin locus control region on the developmental regulation of globin gene expression in beta-globin locus yeast artificial chromosome transgenic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:6605–6609. [PubMed]
21. Peterson KR, Zitnik G, Huxley C, Lowrey CH, Gnirke A, Leppig KA, et al. Use of yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) for studying control of gene expression: correct regulation of the genes of a human beta-globin locus YAC following transfer to mouse erythroleukemia cell lines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:11207–11211. [PubMed]
22. Stamatoyannopoulos G, Grosveld F. Hemoglobin switching. In: Stamatoyannopoulos G, Majerus PW, Perlmutter RM, Varmus H, editors. Molecular Basis of Blood Diseases. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders; 2001. pp. 135–182.
23. Fedosyuk H, Peterson KR. Deletion of the human beta-globin LCR 5′HS4 or 5′HS1 differentially affects beta-like globin gene expression in beta-YAC transgenic mice. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2007;39:44–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Hug BA, Wesselschmidt RL, Fiering S, Bender MA, Epner E, Groudine M, Ley TJ. Analysis of mice containing a targeted deletion of beta-globin locus control region 5′ hypersensitive site 3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996;16:2906–2912. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Hu X, Bulger M, Bender MA, Fields J, Groudine M, Fiering S. Deletion of the core region of 5′ HS2 of the mouse beta-globin locus control region reveals a distinct effect in comparison with human beta-globin transgenes. Blood. 2006;107:821–826. [PubMed]
26. Navas PA, Peterson KR, Li Q, McArthur M, Stamatoyannopoulos G. The 5′HS4; core element of the human beta-globin locus control region is required for high-level globin gene expression in definitive but not in primitive erythropoiesis. J. Mol. Biol. 2001;312:17–26. [PubMed]
27. Bender MA, Roach JN, Halow J, Close J, Alami R, Bouhassira EE, et al. Targeted deletion of 5′HS1 and 5′HS4 of the beta-globin locus control region reveals additive activity of the DNaseI hyper-sensitive sites. Blood. 2001;98:2022–2027. [PubMed]
28. Fiering S, Epner E, Robinson K, Zhuang Y, Telling A, Hu M, et al. Targeted deletion of 5′HS2 of the murine beta-globin LCR reveals that it is not essential for proper regulation of the beta-globin locus. Genes Dev. 1995;9:2203–2213. [PubMed]
29. Higgs DR, Wood WG, Jarman AP, Sharpe J, Lida J, Pretorius IM, Ayyub H. A major positive regulatory region located far upstream of the human alpha-globin gene locus. Genes Dev. 1990;4:1588–1601. [PubMed]
30. Anguita E, Sharpe JA, Sloane-Stanley JA, Tufarelli C, Higgs DR, Wood WG. Deletion of the mouse alpha-globin regulatory element (HS-26) has an unexpectedly mild phenotype. Blood. 2002;100:3450–3456. [PubMed]
31. Wallace HA, Marques-Kranc F, Richardson M, Luna-Crespo F, Sharpe JA, Hughes J, et al. Manipulating the mouse genome to engineer precise functional syntenic replacements with human sequence. Cell. 2007;128:197–209. [PubMed]
32. Bulger M, Groudine M. Looping versus linking: toward a model for long-distance gene activation. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2465–2477. [PubMed]
33. Horn PJ, Peterson CL. Chromatin higher order folding: wrapping up transcription. Science. 2002;297:1824–1827. [PubMed]
34. Enver T, Li Q, Gale KB, Hu M, May GE, Karlinsey JE, et al. Analysis of the developmental and transcriptional potentiation functions of 5′HS2 of the murine beta-globin locus control region in transgenic mice. Dev. Biol. 1994;165:574–584. [PubMed]
35. Hardison R, Slightom JL, Gumucio DL, Goodman M, Stojanovic N, Miller W. Locus control regions of mammalian beta-globin gene clusters: combining phylogenetic analyses and experimental results to gain functional insights. Gene. 1997;205:73–94. [PubMed]
36. Gong QH, McDowell JC, Dean A. Essential role of NF-E2 in remodeling of chromatin structure and transcriptional activation of the epsilon-globin gene in vivo by 5′ hypersensitive site 2 of the beta-globin locus control region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996;16:6055–6064. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Tolhuis B, Palstra RJ, Splinter E, Grosveld F, de Laat W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locusMol. Cell. 2002;10:1453–1465. [PubMed]
38. Fang X, Xiang P, Yin W, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Li Q. Cooperativeness of the higher chromatin structure of the beta-globin locus revealed by the deletion mutations of DNase I hypersensitive site 3 of the LCR. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;365:31–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Palstra RJ, Tolhuis B, Splinter E, Nijmeijer R, Grosveld F, de Laat W. The beta-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2003;35:190–194. [PubMed]