PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2010; 5(4): e9994.
Published online 2010 April 2. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0009994
PMCID: PMC2848841

Topoisomerase IIα Binding Domains of Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Influence Cell Cycle Progression and Aneuploidy

Kevin G. Hardwick, Editor

Abstract

Background

Truncating mutations in the tumor suppressor gene APC (Adenomatous Polyposis Coli) are thought to initiate the majority of colorectal cancers. The 15- and 20-amino acid repeat regions of APC bind β-catenin and have been widely studied for their role in the negative regulation of canonical Wnt signaling. However, functions of APC in other important cellular processes, such as cell cycle control or aneuploidy, are only beginning to be studied. Our previous investigation implicated the 15-amino acid repeat region of APC (M2-APC) in the regulation of the G2/M cell cycle transition through interaction with topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα).

Methodology/Principal Findings

We now demonstrate that the 20-amino acid repeat region of APC (M3-APC) also interacts with topo IIα in colonic epithelial cells. Expression of M3-APC in cells with full-length endogenous APC causes cell accumulation in G2. However, cells with a mutated topo IIα isoform and lacking topo IIβ did not arrest, suggesting that the cellular consequence of M2- or M3-APC expression depends on functional topoisomerase II. Both purified recombinant M2- and M3-APC significantly enhanced the activity of topo IIα. Of note, although M3-APC can bind β-catenin, the G2 arrest did not correlate with β-catenin expression or activity, similar to what was seen with M2-APC. More importantly, expression of either M2- or M3-APC also led to increased aneuploidy in cells with full-length endogenous APC but not in cells with truncated endogenous APC that includes the M2-APC region.

Conclusions/Significance

Together, our data establish that the 20-amino acid repeat region of APC interacts with topo IIα to enhance its activity in vitro, and leads to G2 cell cycle accumulation and aneuploidy when expressed in cells containing full-length APC. These findings provide an additional explanation for the aneuploidy associated with many colon cancers that possess truncated APC.

Introduction

Mutation of the tumor suppressor Adenomatous Polyposis coli (APC) gene is considered an initiating event in over 80% of all colorectal cancers [1]. Mutations in APC have also been associated with chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in early polyps from FAP (Familial Adenomatous Polyposis) patients [2], [3], [4]. Although the ability of APC to suppress canonical Wnt signaling by targeting β-catenin is critical for APC to suppress tumorigenesis [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], accumulating evidence suggests that APC likely suppresses tumor development through pathways besides inhibiting canonical Wnt signaling [see review [10]].

Among the multiple functions of APC identified is cell cycle regulation [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. APC involvement in G1/S is attributed to its recognized role in canonical Wnt signaling. APC participation in the G2/M transition involves interaction with topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) [18]. However, the mechanism by which APC regulates the G2-M cell cycle transition is poorly understood.

Besides being an enzyme that catalyzes DNA topology changes [19], [20], [21], [22], topo IIα is also a critical regulator of one G2/M checkpoint during cell division, the decatenation checkpoint [23]. Inhibition of topo IIα activity leads to initiation of the G2 decatenation checkpoint, resulting in G2 cell cycle arrest [23]. Topo IIβ, a closely related protein, has a similar amino acid sequence and activity as topo IIα, but is dispensable for cell cycle control [24], [25], [26].

Previously, we found full-length endogenous APC interacts with endogenous topo IIα but not with topo IIβ [18]. Expression of a central fragment of APC that binds topo IIα led to cell cycle accumulation in G2, independent of β-catenin [18]. Thus, we concluded that nuclear APC interacts with topo IIα and thus, might be involved in the regulation of cell cycle progression. In the current study, we identify a second domain in the central portion of APC that specifically binds to topo IIα but not topo IIβ. Both APC central domains dramatically impact the activity of topo IIα in vitro. Cell lines with full-length endogenous APC that express either of the APC domains capable of modifying topo IIα activity accumulate in G2 and display increased aneuploidy. Using a cell line lacking topo IIβ and with a mutant isoform of topo IIα, we demonstrate that cell cycle arrest triggered by expression of middle APC fragments requires normal expression of endogenous topo IIα. Our data implies that full-length APC can participate in the topo IIα-mediated regulation of the G2-M transition.

Results

Two central regions of APC bind topo IIα

Previously, we identified an interaction between endogenous APC and topo IIα [18]. Exogenous expression of the 15-amino acid repeat region of APC (M2-APC) that interacts with topo IIα led to G2 cell cycle arrest. In the present study, we investigated whether the 20-amino acid repeat region of APC (M3-APC) also interacts with topo IIα. Topo IIα specifically co-precipitates with both EGFP-fused M2- and M3-APC (Figure 1B, top blot). However, topo IIβ does not co-precipitate with either APC fragment under the same experimental conditions (Figure 1B, second blot). EGFP-M2-APC encompasses APC amino acids 959–1338 while EGFP-M3-APC contains amino acids 1211–2075 (Figure 1A). The M3 region contains two mono-partite nuclear localization signals [27]. Together, these two regions contain all 15- and 20-amino acid repeats of APC that mediate β-catenin binding and downregulation. Therefore, β-catenin co-precipitation with both M2- and M3-APC, served as a positive control (Figure 1B, third blot).

Figure 1
Both 15aa and 20aa repeat regions of APC interact with topo IIα.

A functional interaction between purified M2- or M3-APC and topo IIα

Given that exogenous M2- and M3-APC each interact with endogenous topo IIα, we tested whether both APC fragments would also influence two different reactions catalyzed by topo IIα. Purified non-overlapping recombinant M2- and M3-APC fragments each enhanced the ability of purified topo IIα to resolve highly catenated kinetoplast DNA into decatenated mini DNA circles in vitro (Figure 2A and 2B). Neither purified M2- nor M3-APC showed decatenation activity in the absence of topo IIα (Figure 2A and 2B). Topo IIα enzyme can also convert supercoiled DNA into relaxed circular DNA and this relaxation activity was enhanced by addition of purified M2- or M3-APC (Figure 2C). Neither purified M2- nor M3-APC relaxed the supercoiled DNA in the absence of topo IIα (Figure 2C). While it was clear that purified M2- or M3-APC enhanced both decatenation and relaxation activities of purified topo IIα, we wanted to eliminate the possibility that these effects were due to increased total protein concentration in the reactions and were instead specific properties of M2 and M3-APC. Purified BSA did not enhance topo IIα activities (Figures 2B and 2D). In contrast, when reactions performed such that the purified topo IIα alone displayed moderate activity, the addition of purified BSA protein slightly inhibited both decatenation and relaxation activities of topo IIα (Figure 2B and 2D). These in vitro assays provide additional support for a functional interaction between APC and topo IIα. Furthermore, purified M2- and M3-APC had no area of overlap, and yet each interacted with purified topo IIα. We conclude that although the EGFP-M3-APC used for cell studies overlaps slightly with the EGFP-M2-APC, this area of overlap is not solely responsible for the topo IIα interaction and M2- and M3-APC can each interact with and affect topo IIα independently.

Figure 2
Recombinant M2- and M3-APC each enhance topo IIα activity in vitro.

Expression of M2- or M3-APC results in G2 cell cycle arrest

M2- and M3-APC each bind endogenous topo IIα in cells (Figure 1B) and purified topo IIα in vitro (Figure 2). Thus, we expressed M3-APC in HCT116βw cells (HCT116 cells that contain only a wild-type allele of β-catenin) to determine whether this expression altered cell cycle progression. Cell cycle distribution was determined by FACS analysis of living cells labeled with propidium iodide. Similar to what was previously seen using M2-APC [18], cells expressing M3-APC progressively accumulated in the G2/M phases of the cell cycle, while cells expressing EGFP did not (Figure 3A and B, Table S1). When compared to cells expressing EGFP alone, cells expressing M3-APC for 72 hours showed a 2-fold increase in G2/M distribution and a 31% decrease in S phase distribution; cells expressing M2-APC showed a 2.4-fold increase in G2/M distribution and a 77% decrease in S phase distribution. We conclude that expression of M2- or M3-APC leads to cell cycle accumulation in G2/M. Of note, the reduction in S phase cells seen upon expression of M2- or M3-APC, suggested a second cell cycle delay prior to S phase, likely in G1. This apparent delay in G1 is consistent with a previous observation that APC regulates the G1-S transition [13].

Figure 3
Cells expressing M2- or M3-APC progressively accumulate in G2.

M2-APC expression elicits cell accumulation in the G2 phase rather than in mitosis [18]. FACS analysis does not distinguish between the G2 and M cell cycle populations. Thus, to determine whether expression of M3-APC also resulted in G2 accumulation, we determined the mitotic indices in living or fixed M3-APC-expressing cells at 24 and 48 hours post-transfection. We found no significant expansion of the mitotic population in M3-APC expressing cells by either counting phospho-histone H3 positive cells (data not shown) or by estimating the percentage of living cells displaying mitotic figures as visualized with Hoechst stain (Figure 3C and Table S2). Therefore, as previously reported for M2-APC, the expanded G2/M population of M3-APC-expressing cells determined by FACS analysis represents an accumulation in G2, not in M. Together, these results demonstrate that M3-APC and M2-APC each induce G2 cell cycle arrest when expressed in a colon epithelial cell line with full-length APC.

G2 arrest triggered by M2- and M3-APC is not dependent on p53

Tumor suppressor p53 participates in various pathways that regulate the G2/M transition (reviewed in [28]). To determine if p53 is required for the M2- and M3-APC-mediated G2 arrest, we determined the consequences of M2- or M3-APC expression in the promyelocytic leukemia cell line, HL-60. HL-60 cells express full-length APC protein (data not shown) but are null for p53 [29]. When either M2- or M3-APC was expressed in HL-60 cells, the G2/M population increased significantly (Figure 4A and Table S3). M2-APC expression resulted in a near doubling of the G2/M population, while M3-APC expression resulted in a tripling of the G2/M population. The G2 arrest in HL-60 cells indicates that the impact of M2- and M3-APC on the cell cycle is not restricted to colon epithelial cell lines. Moreover, the G2 cell cycle arrest triggered by expression of either M2- or M3-APC is not dependent on p53.

Figure 4
Expression of M2- or M3-APC results in G2/M accumulation in HL60 but not HL60/MX2 cells.

Cells deficient in topo II do not arrest in G2 following expression of either M2- or M3-APC

Based on our data, we hypothesize that exogenous M2- and M3-APC each interact with endogenous topo IIα, resulting in a p53-independent cell cycle arrest in G2. Ideally, to demonstrate that this APC-mediated cell cycle regulation is dependent upon topo IIα, we would eliminate topo IIα from the analyzed cells. Unfortunately, topo IIα is an essential protein and its perturbation typically results in cell cycle delay followed by cell death [30]. Although no cultured mammalian cell line completely lacks topo IIα, there are cell line variants such as HL-60/MX2 cells with compromised topo IIα activity. HL-60/MX2 cells were originally generated by selecting for resistance to the topo II inhibitor mitoxantrone [31]. Thus, compared to parental HL-60 cells, they are 195-fold less sensitive to drugs that target topo II [32], [33], [34]. This resistance has been attributed to the observation that HL-60/MX2 cells express no topo IIβ, only a low level of topo IIα, and a truncated topo IIα with reduced activity and aberrant subcellular localization [32], [33], [34]. In contrast to the parental HL-60 cells, we observed that HL-60/MX2 cells expressing M2- or M3-APC showed no increase in the G2/M population (Figure 4 and Table S3). Rather, the slight decrease in G2/M and increase in the S population of M2- and M3-APC-expressing cells were not significantly different from the EGFP-expressing HL-60/MX2 cells. Taken together with our observation that M2- and M3-APC interact preferentially with topo IIα rather than topo IIβ (Figure 1B), we conclude that topo IIα is required for M2- or M3-APC-triggered cell cycle arrest in G2.

Cells with truncated APC do not arrest in G2 following expression of M2- or M3-APC

The majority of somatic APC mutations in colon cancers result in overexpression of a truncated protein that includes all of the M2-APC region and part of M3-APC (Table 1). We examined the cell cycle profile of SW480 cells which express an endogenous APC protein truncated at amino acid 1368. In SW480 cells, expression of either M2- or M3-APC did not lead to G2 arrest, or any other alterations in the cell cycle phases (Figure 5 and Table S4).

Figure 5
Expression of M2- or M3-APC does not affect cell cycle progression of colon cancer cells with endogenous truncated APC.
Table 1
Correlation of karyotype with APC status and presence of M2 and M3-APC in some commonly used colorectal cancer cell lines.

G2 accumulation in M2- and M3-APC-expressing cells does not depend on β-catenin regulation

A major function of the central region of tumor suppressor APC is to target, β-catenin for proteasome-mediated destruction. We have previously reported that expression of M2-APC does not alter β-catenin localization, level or activity and concluded that the G2 arrest triggered by M2-APC is not likely mediated by β-catenin [18]. Although both M2 and M3-APC bind β-catenin, only the M3-APC region is capable of targeting β-catenin for cytoplasmic destruction. To test if the G2 arrest triggered by M3-APC involves β-catenin regulation, we expressed M3-APC in HCT116βm cells which produce only stabilized β-catenin that can not be targeted for degradation [35]. HCT116βm cells expressing either M2 or M3-APC displayed a near doubling of the G2/M population with an accompanying decrease in the G0/G1 population when compared to HCT116βm cells expressing EGFP alone (Figure 6A and B and Table S5). Moreover, using a reporter construct to determine β-catenin activity as a transcription co-activator of LEF-1, it was demonstrated that expression of M3-APC led to increased β-catenin activity in HCT116βm cells, but slightly decreased β-catenin activity in HCT116βw cells (Figure 6C). This opposing effect of M3-APC on β-catenin activities in the two cell lines supports our conclusion that a decrease in β-catenin activity is not required for M3-APC-triggered G2/M cell cycle delay. Furthermore, expression of APC amino acids 1379–2080 in SW480 resulted in decreased β-catenin activity [36]. Thus, our finding that SW480 cells expressing M3-APC do not arrest in G2 (Figure 5) indicates that decreasing β-catenin activity is not sufficient to trigger a G2/M cell cycle delay.

Figure 6
Mutant β-catenin does not compromise the ability of M2- or M3-APC to trigger G2 cell cycle arrest.

G2 arrest triggered by M2- and M3-APC is accompanied by increased aneuploidy

Although derived from human colon cancer tissue, the HCT116 cell line retains a stable diploid karyotype. Not only did HCT116 cells expressing either M2- or M3-APC show progressive G2 arrest, but they displayed a significant increase in aneuploidy (Figure 7 and Table S1). In contrast, SW480 cells are originally aneuploid [Table 1]. Expression of either M2- or M3-APC in SW480 cells did not lead to a significant increase in aneuploidy (Figure 7 and Table S4).

Figure 7
Expression of M2- or M3-APC results in increased aneuploidy in cells possessing full-length APC, but not in cells with truncated APC.

Discussion

In this study, we identified a novel topo IIα binding domain (M3) in the central region of APC that enhances both decatenation and relaxation activities of purified topo IIα. Cells expressing M2- or M3-APC accumulated in the G2 phase of the cell cycle and showed increased aneuploidy; however, this result was not observed in cells with endogenous truncated APC missing part of the M3 domain. The G2 arrest was also independent of p53 but was dependent on topo IIα. Our data indicate the central region of APC interacts with topo IIα and thereby regulates G2-M cell cycle progression.

M2 and M3-APC each trigger G2 cell cycle arrest independent of topo IIβ

Topo IIα and topo IIβ are 75% identical in protein sequence and share some functional similarity in promoting DNA topology changes. However, successful generation of cell lines and mouse models completely lacking topo IIβ [24], [25], [26] indicates that topo IIβ is dispensable for cell cycle progression. In contrast, topo IIα is essential for cell cycle control. Our finding that M2- and M3-APC interact with endogenous topo IIα but not topo IIβ (Fig. 1B) is consistent with our previous observation that full-length endogenous APC interacts with endogenous topo IIα but not topo IIβ [18]. Based on this information, we conclude that APC-mediated G2 cell cycle arrest is not dependent on topo IIβ.

Abnormal nuclear morphology is not associated with G2 arrest

We previously reported that expression of M2-APC in HCT116βw cells leads to abnormal nuclear morphology and G2 cell cycle arrest [18]. In contrast, although expression of M3-APC in HCT116βw cells also resulted in G2 arrest, the abnormal nuclear morphology was not observed until 72 hours post-transfection (data not shown). Since both M2 and M3-APC interact with and affect topo IIα, it seems most likely that the altered nuclear morphology observed shortly after M2-APC expression is topo IIα-independent. Furthermore, the abnormal nuclear morphology was also seen in SW480 cells [18] which do not undergo a G2 arrest following expression of either M2- or M3-APC (Figure 5). Thus, the abnormal nuclear morphology is not associated with G2 arrest.

M2- and M3-APC are not identical in their interaction with topo IIα

Although both M2- and M3-APC bind topo IIα and trigger G2 cell cycle arrest when expressed in HCT116βw, HCT116βm, or HL60 cells, the cellular response to the two fragments is not identical. Altered nuclear morphology was observed 24 hours after expression of M2-APC [18]. In contrast, nuclear morphological alterations were not observed until 72 hours after expression of M3-APC (data not shown). In HCT116βw cells, expression of M2-APC for 72 hours resulted in a more robust G2 cell cycle accumulation than did expression of M3-APC (Figure 3B). In HL60 cells, expression of M3-APC resulted in a more robust G2 cell cycle accumulation than did expression of M2-APC (Figure 4). In transfected HCT116βw cells, M2-APC protein levels were approximately 3-fold higher than that of full-length endogenous APC and 2.7-fold higher than M3-APC levels (data not shown). However, M2- and M3-APC appeared able to co-precipitate equivalent amounts of endogenous topo IIα (Figure 1B). In general, it appeared that transfected HCT116βw cells expressed more M2-APC than M3-APC, but M3-APC was better able to bind endogenous topo IIα than M2-APC. Experiments using purified non-overlapping recombinant M2- and M3-APC fragments revealed that M3-APC enhanced the decatenation activity of purified topo IIα at a lower molar concentration than M2-APC (Fig. 2A). The opposite was observed in in vitro relaxation assays, where M2-APC appeared to enhance the ability of topo IIα to relax supercoiled DNA more effectively than M3-APC (Fig. 2C). Together, these observations are consistent with M2- and M3-APC binding to different regions of topo IIα and thus modifying topo IIα activity by slightly different mechanisms. Further investigation is required to identify the specific topo IIα binding sites and delineate the underlying mechanisms.

Potential molecular mechanism and physiological relevance

Over 60% of FAP polyps display aneuploidy [2], [3], [4]. It has been proposed that APC mutations contribute to chromosomal instability (CIN) through loss of spindle-kinetochore attachment or misregulation of the cytoskeleton [for review, see [37]]. More recently, an association of truncated APC fragments with mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2 was reported to inactivate the mitotic checkpoint, thus providing another potential mechanism for CIN [38]. We propose a novel mechanism that might contribute to increased aneuploidy following mutation of APC. Our model is based on evidence that middle fragments of APC bind to topo IIα, affect topo IIα activity, and result in G2 cell cycle accumulation and increased aneuploidy when expressed exogenously.

We propose that expression of M2- or M3-APC causes altered topo IIα activity, thus activating the G2 decatenation checkpoint, which leads to G2 arrest. Aneuploid cells would result from altered topo IIα activity in the small percentage of mitotic cells that escape the G2 decatenation checkpoint. The G2 decatenation checkpoint is vital for cell cycle control and genomic integrity. Cells lacking the G2 decatenation checkpoint become aneuploid [39], [40]. A variety of topo II inhibitors have been shown to arrest cells in G2 by activating the G2 decatenation checkpoint [23]. It is possible that only cells with an intact G2 decatenation checkpoint can be arrested in G2 by expression of middle regions of APC. Consistent with this hypothesis, all cell lines we observed to undergo G2 arrest upon M2 or M3-APC expression possessed an intact decatenation checkpoint [41], [42]. HL60-MX2 cells have no decatenation checkpoint [32], [33], [34] and did not arrest in G2 (Fig. 4). In our study, the display of aneuploidy in cells expressing M2- or M3-APC increased steadily over time (Figure 7). We suggest that the basis for this aneuploid accumulation is compromised topo IIα activity in cells that escape the G2 decatenation checkpoint. We further predict that in FAP patients, truncated APC fragments which contain the M2 region would similarly interact with topo IIα and this might result in aneuploidy. In support of this prediction, a literature review of colorectal cancer cell lines reveals a general trend that cells with full-length APC are diploid with stable karyotypes (Table 1). In contrast, cell lines that express a truncated APC that includes M2-APC are mostly aneuploid, with very few exceptions. Our results provide a potential explanation for the presence of aneuploidy in early FAP adenomas. Further experiments comparing topo IIα activity in colon cancer cell lines harboring various truncating APC mutations are needed to establish a direct link between topo IIα activity and aneuploidy. The current study expands the repertoire of molecular factors implicated in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer, illuminating new areas for future development of treatment strategies.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and DNA constructs

HCT116βw (containing one wild-type allele of β-catenin) and HCT116βm (containing one mutant allele of β-catenin) cells (a gift from Dr. Bert Vogelstein) and SW480 (ATCC) were grown in McCoy's 5A medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone). HL60 cells (ATCC) were grown in Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium (ATCC) supplemented with 20% FBS (Hyclone). HL60/MX2 (ATCC) were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Cellgro) supplemented with 10% FBS. Expression constructs for APC fragments fused to EGFP were kindly provided by Dr. Naoki Watanabe and have been described previously [43]. His and S dual-tag fused M2-APC was made as described [18]. To generate recombinant N-terminal His and S dual-tag fused APC fragment M3, the corresponding cDNA for APC (amino acid 1330–2058) was amplified using PCR and subcloned into a pET-30a(+) vector.

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblots

HCT116βw cells were transfected using Lipofectamine2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). Transfection efficiencies estimated by FACs analysis were, on average, 48% for EGFP-M2-APC and 62% for EGFP-M3-APC. Estimated relative levels of M2-APC, M3-APC and full-length endogenous APC in whole cell lysates were 1.6[ratio]0.7[ratio]1. Immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblots (IB) were performed using anti-GFP pAb (Invitrogen) as described [18]. Immunoblots were probed with the following antibodies: anti-β-catenin (1[ratio]2000, Sigma); anti-topo IIα (1[ratio]1000, Research Diagnostics, Inc.); anti-topo IIβ (1[ratio]1000, Santa Cruz); anti-GFP pAb (1[ratio]1000, Invitrogen); and anti-α-tubulin (1[ratio]2000, Oncogene).

Electroporation and FACS analysis

Cells grown on plastic were treated with trypsin to obtain a single cell suspension. A total of 2 µg of EGFP, EGFP fused M2-, or M3-APC expression plasmid were electroporated using Nucleofector I (Amaxa) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Electroporation programs used were: HCT116βw (program D-32), HCT116βm (program D-32), HL60 (program T-19), and HL60/MX2 (program X-03). SW480 cells were transfected with Metafectine (Scientifix, Australia). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, single cells in suspension were stained with 0.5 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) for 30 minutes at 37°C. FACS analysis was performed using both UV and 488 nm lasers on a 5-laser BD LSRII flow cytometry (BD Bioscience). Ten thousand EGFP-positive cells were collected for each sample. Data were analyzed using BD FACSDiva Software (BD Bioscience) and plotted using WinMDI 2.9.

Recombinant proteins and topo IIα relaxation and decatenation assays

Recombinant S-tag fused M2-APC (amino acid 1000–1326) and M3-APC (amino acid 1330–2058) were generated as described [18]. BSA (Sigma) was diluted in S-tagged APC protein dilution buffer (20 mM Hepes pH 7.8, 100 mM NaCl). Recombinant human topo IIα and topo IIβ were made as described [44], [45]. In vitro topo IIα relaxation and decatenation assays were performed as described [20].

Antibodies and immunofluorescence

Cells transfected with EGFP or EGFP-fused M3-APC were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and immunostaining was performed using anti-phospho-histone H3 (1[ratio]500, Upstate) as described [46]. One hundred EGFP-positive cells were randomly chosen, and only cells also positive for phospho-histone-H3 were counted. As a second method to determine mitotic indices, living cells were stained with 0.5 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 at 24 and 48 hours post-transfection and mitotic figures were counted for 100 cells in each category. The mitotic indices are presented as an average ± s.d. of three independent experiments.

Reporter gene assay

HCT116βw and HCT116βm cells grown in 24-well plates were co-transfected using Metafectine reagent (Scientifix, Australia) with 2 µg of the EGFP-M2-APC, EGFP-M3-APC or EGFP expression construct, 100 ng of the TCF-reporter construct SuperTOP-flash or FOPflash (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), and 50 ng of the pRL-TK Renilla luciferase construct (Promega, WI) as a control to normalize for transfection efficiency. After 48 hours, cells were harvested and luciferase activities were determined using the Dual-Luciferase® assay system (Promega) and a Turner Designs TD-20/20 luminometer. SuperTOP-flash and FOPflash luciferase activities were first normalized by pRL-TK Renilla luciferase, and then the normalized SuperTOP-flash luciferase activity was divided by normalized FOPflash luciferase activity to calculate relative β-catenin activity.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Cell cycle distribution in HCT116 βw cells expressing GFP, M2-APC, or M3-APC. Transfected cells were stained with Hoechst blue, and the cell cycle distribution G0/G1 (2N), S (between 2N and 4N), and G2/M (4N) was determined by FACS at three time points post-transfection. For each transfection, 10,000 GFP-positive cells were analyzed. Table shows the average from three independent experiments.

(0.04 MB DOC)

Table S2

Mitotic indices of HCT116βw cells expressing GFP, M2-APC, or M3-APC. Live GFP, M2-APC, and M3-APC expressing cells at 48 hours post-transfection were stained with Hochest blue. Mitotic cells were counted according to DNA morphology from 100 randomly selected GFP positive cells. Table shows the average from three independent experiments. p values were calculated by comparing M2 or M3-APC expressing cells to GFP expressing cells using student t test.

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S3

Cell cycle distribution of parental HL60 and HL60/MX2 cells expressing GFP, M2-APC, or M3-APC. Cell cycle distributions of GFP, M2-APC, and M3-APC expressing cells at 48 hours post-transfection. For each transfection, 10,000 GFP-positive cells were analyzed. Table shows the average from three independent experiments.

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S4

Cell cycle distribution of SW480 cells expressing GFP, M2-APC, or M3-APC. Cell cycle distributions of GFP, M2-APC, and M3-APC expressing cells at 48 hours post-transfection. For each transfection, 10,000 GFP-positive cells were analyzed. Table shows the average from three independent experiments. For aneupoid cells, p values for M2-APC is 0.16, and for M3-APC is 0.09.

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S5

Cell cycle distribution of HCT116βm cells expressing GFP, M2-APC, or M3-APC. Cell cycle distributions of GFP, M2-APC, and M3-APC expressing cells at 48 hours post-transfection. For each transfection, 10,000 GFP-positive cells were analyzed. Table shows the average from three independent experiments.

(0.03 MB DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Yoshiaki Azuma (University of Kansas) for technical assistance with purification of recombinant M2- and M3-APC proteins, Michael Dohn (Vanderbilt University) for critical reading of the manuscript, Kozo Kaibuchi (Nagoya University, Japan) for providing expression constructs for APC fragments fused to EGFP, Bert Vogelstein (The Johns Hopkins University) for providing the HCT116βw and HCT116βm cell lines (mut ko, β-cat wt/- and wt ko, β-cat -/mut, respectively), Jo Ann Byl (Vanderbilt University) for providing recombinant topo IIα proteins, and James Higginbotham (Vanderbilt University) for technical support with FACS-based cell cycle analysis. Topo IIα antisera used for this project was generously provided by Joseph A. Holden, in whose memory this work is dedicated.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was funded in part by NIH RO1 CA10922 (Y.W. and K.L.N.), GI Special Program of Research Excellence CA95103 (R.J.C), NCI RO1 CA46413 (R.J.C), GM33944 (N.O.), Higuchi Biosciences Center J.R. & Inez Jay Award (Y.W. and K.L.N.), and the KUCC Pilot Project Award (Y.W. and K.L.N.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996;87:159–170. [PubMed]
2. Cardoso J, Molenaar L, de Menezes RX, van Leerdam M, Rosenberg C, et al. Chromosomal instability in MYH- and APC-mutant adenomatous polyps. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2514–2519. [PubMed]
3. Svendsen LB. Congenital genetic instability in colorectal carcinomas. Dan Med Bull. 1993;40:546–556. [PubMed]
4. Quirke P, Dixon MF, Day DW, Fozard JB, Talbot IC, et al. DNA aneuploidy and cell proliferation in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut. 1988;29:603–607. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Aberle H, Bauer A, Stappert J, Kispert A, Kemler R. β-catenin is a target for the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. EMBO J. 1997;16:3797–3804. [PubMed]
6. Behrens J, Jerchow BA, Wurtele M, Grimm J, Asbrand C, et al. Functional interaction of an axin homolog, conductin, with beta- catenin, APC, and GSK3beta. Science. 1998;280:596–599. [PubMed]
7. Hart MJ, de los Santos R, Albert IN, Rubinfeld B, Polakis P. Downregulation of beta-catenin by human Axin and its association with the APC tumor suppressor, beta-catenin and GSK3 beta. Curr Biol. 1998;8:573–581. [PubMed]
8. Ikeda S, Kishida S, Yamamoto H, Murai H, Koyama S, et al. Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, forms a complex with GSK-3beta and beta-catenin and promotes GSK-3beta- dependent phosphorylation of beta-catenin. EMBO J. 1998;17:1371–1384. [PubMed]
9. Nakamura T, Hamada F, Ishidate T, Anai K, Kawahara K, et al. Axin, an inhibitor of the Wnt signalling pathway, interacts with beta-catenin, GSK-3beta and APC and reduces the beta-catenin level. Genes Cells. 1998;3:395–403. [PubMed]
10. Aoki K, Taketo MM. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC): a multi-functional tumor suppressor gene. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3327–3335. [PubMed]
11. Jaiswal AS, Narayan S. Zinc stabilizes adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein levels and induces cell cycle arrest in colon cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2004;93:345–357. [PubMed]
12. Olmeda D, Castel S, Vilaro S, Cano A. Beta-catenin regulation during the cell cycle: implications in G2/M and apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:2844–2860. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Heinen CD, Goss KH, Cornelius JR, Babcock GF, Knudsen ES, et al. The APC tumor suppressor controls entry into S-phase through its ability to regulate the cyclin D/RB pathway. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:751–763. [PubMed]
14. Kaplan KB, Burds AA, Swedlow JR, Bekir SS, Sorger PK, et al. A role for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:429–432. [PubMed]
15. Fodde R, Kuipers J, Rosenberg C, Smits R, Kielman M, et al. Mutations in the APC tumour suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:433–438. [PubMed]
16. Ishidate T, Matsumine A, Toyoshima K, Akiyama T. The APC-hDLG complex negatively regulates cell cycle progression from the G0/G1 to S phase. Oncogene. 2000;19:365–372. [PubMed]
17. Bhattacharjee RN, Hamada F, Toyoshima K, Akiyama T. The tumor suppressor gene product APC is hyperphosphorylated during the M phase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;220:192–195. [PubMed]
18. Wang Y, Azuma Y, Moore D, Osheroff N, Neufeld KL. Interaction between tumor suppressor adenomatous polyposis coli and topoisomerase IIalpha: implication for the G2/M transition. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:4076–4085. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. McClendon AK, Osheroff N. DNA topoisomerase II, genotoxicity, and cancer. Mutat Res. 2007;623:83–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Fortune JM, Osheroff N. Topoisomerase II-catalyzed relaxation and catenation of plasmid DNA. Methods Mol Biol. 2001;95:275–281. [PubMed]
21. Champoux JJ. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:369–413. [PubMed]
22. Wang JC. DNA topoisomerases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:635–692. [PubMed]
23. Downes CS, Clarke DJ, Mullinger AM, Gimenez-Abian JF, Creighton AM, et al. A topoisomerase II-dependent G2 cycle checkpoint in mammalian cells. Nature. 1994;372:467–470. [PubMed]
24. Akimitsu N, Adachi N, Hirai H, Hossain MS, Hamamoto H, et al. Enforced cytokinesis without complete nuclear division in embryonic cells depleting the activity of DNA topoisomerase IIalpha. Genes Cells. 2003;8:393–402. [PubMed]
25. Yang X, Li W, Prescott ED, Burden SJ, Wang JC. DNA topoisomerase IIbeta and neural development. Science. 2000;287:131–134. [PubMed]
26. Grue P, Grasser A, Sehested M, Jensen PB, Uhse A, et al. Essential mitotic functions of DNA topoisomerase IIalpha are not adopted by topoisomerase IIbeta in human H69 cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:33660–33666. [PubMed]
27. Neufeld KL. Nuclear Functions of APC. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;656:13–29. [PubMed]
28. Taylor WR, Stark GR. Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene. 2001;20:1803–1815. [PubMed]
29. Wolf D, Rotter V. Major deletions in the gene encoding the p53 tumor antigen cause lack of p53 expression in HL-60 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:790–794. [PubMed]
30. Carpenter AJ, Porter AC. Construction, characterization, and complementation of a conditional-lethal DNA topoisomerase IIalpha mutant human cell line. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:5700–5711. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Harker WG, Slade DL, Dalton WS, Meltzer PS, Trent JM. Multidrug resistance in mitoxantrone-selected HL-60 leukemia cells in the absence of P-glycoprotein overexpression. Cancer Res. 1989;49:4542–4549. [PubMed]
32. Harker WG, Slade DL, Parr RL, Holguin MH. Selective use of an alternative stop codon and polyadenylation signal within intron sequences leads to a truncated topoisomerase II alpha messenger RNA and protein in human HL-60 leukemia cells selected for resistance to mitoxantrone. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4962–4971. [PubMed]
33. Harker WG, Slade DL, Parr RL, Feldhoff PW, Sullivan DM, et al. Alterations in the topoisomerase II alpha gene, messenger RNA, and subcellular protein distribution as well as reduced expression of the DNA topoisomerase II beta enzyme in a mitoxantrone-resistant HL-60 human leukemia cell line. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1707–1716. [PubMed]
34. Harker WG, Slade DL, Drake FH, Parr RL. Mitoxantrone resistance in HL-60 leukemia cells: reduced nuclear topoisomerase II catalytic activity and drug-induced DNA cleavage in association with reduced expression of the topoisomerase II beta isoform. Biochemistry. 1991;30:9953–9961. [PubMed]
35. Chan TA, Wang Z, Dang LH, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Targeted inactivation of CTNNB1 reveals unexpected effects of beta-catenin mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8265–8270. [PubMed]
36. Rosin-Arbesfeld R, Cliffe A, Brabletz T, Bienz M. Nuclear export of the APC tumour suppressor controls beta-catenin function in transcription. Embo J. 2003;22:1101–1113. [PubMed]
37. Rusan N, Peifer M. Original CIN: reviewing roles for APC in chromosome instability. J Cell Biol. 2008;181:719–726. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Zhang J, Neisa R, Mao Y. Oncogenic Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Mutants Impair the Mitotic Checkpoint through Direct Interaction with Mad2. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:2381–2388. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Ishida R, Sato M, Narita T, Utsumi KR, Nishimoto T, et al. Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II by ICRF-193 induces polyploidization by uncoupling chromosome dynamics from other cell cycle events. J Cell Biol. 1994;126:1341–1351. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Gorbsky GJ. Cell cycle progression and chromosome segregation in mammalian cells cultured in the presence of the topoisomerase II inhibitors ICRF-187 [(+)-1,2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazinyl-1-yl)propane; ADR-529] and ICRF-159 (Razoxane). Cancer Res. 1994;54:1042–1048. [PubMed]
41. Sugimoto K, Sasaki M, Isobe Y, Tsutsui M, Suto H, et al. Hsp90-inhibitor geldanamycin abrogates G2 arrest in p53-negative leukemia cell lines through the depletion of Chk1. Oncogene. 2008;27:3091–3101. [PubMed]
42. Skoufias DA, Lacroix FB, Andreassen PR, Wilson L, Margolis RL. Inhibition of DNA decatenation, but not DNA damage, arrests cells at metaphase. Mol Cell. 2004;15:977–990. [PubMed]
43. Watanabe T, Wang S, Noritake J, Sato K, Fukata M, et al. Interaction with IQGAP1 links APC to Rac1, Cdc42, and actin filaments during cell polarization and migration. Dev Cell. 2004;7:871–883. [PubMed]
44. Kingma PS, Greider CA, Osheroff N. Spontaneous DNA lesions poison human topoisomerase IIalpha and stimulate cleavage proximal to leukemic 11q23 chromosomal breakpoints. Biochemistry. 1997;36:5934–5939. [PubMed]
45. Worland ST, Wang JC. Inducible overexpression, purification, and active site mapping of DNA topoisomerase II from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:4412–4416. [PubMed]
46. Zhang F, White RL, Neufeld KL. Cell density and phosphorylation control the subcellular localization of adenomatous polyposis coli protein. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:8143–8156. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Woodford-Richens KL, Rowan AJ, Gorman P, Halford S, Bicknell DC, et al. SMAD4 Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Probably Occur Before Chromosomal Instability, but After Divergence of the Microsatellite Instability Pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:9719–9723. [PubMed]
48. Abdel-Rahman WM, Katsura K, Rens W, Gorman PA, Sheer D, et al. Spectral karyotyping suggests additional subsets of colorectal cancers characterized by pattern of chromosome rearrangement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:2538–2543. [PubMed]
49. Kleivi K, Teixeira M, Eknaes M, Diep C, Jakobsen K, et al. Genome signatures of colon carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004;155:119–131. [PubMed]
50. NCI and NCBI's SKY/M-FISH and CGH Database 2001: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sky/skyweb.cgi
51. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature. 1997;386:623–627. [PubMed]
52. Rowan AJ, Lamlum H, Ilyas M, Wheeler J, Straub J, et al. APC mutations in sporadic colorectal tumors: A mutational "hotspot" and interdependence of the "two hits&quot. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3352–3357. [PubMed]
53. Dang D, Mahatan C, Dang L, Agboola I, Yang V. Expression of the gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor (Kruppel-like factor 4) gene in the human colon cancer cell line RKO is dependent on CDX2. Oncogene. 2001;20:4884–4890. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science