|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe the early clinical experience with AWBAT. Methods: Burn patients requiring (1) donor sites or (2) treatment of a superficial burn wound injury were treated. A total of 45 patients with 69 distinct wounds were included. AWBATTM-D was evaluated in donor sites and AWBATTM-S was evaluated in superficial partial-thickness burns. Days to healing, pain, hematoma/seroma formation, and infection were noted. Ease of application, adherence, transparency, and physical adaptability details were collected. Results: Average period to healing of donor sites treated with AWBAT-D (n=22 patients with n=26 wounds) was 11.2 days, σ =1.95, with a range of 8–15 days and a median of 11 days. Pain rating at 24 hours was 1.2, σ =0.43 (n=18) and at 48 hours mean was 1.2, σ =0.46 (n=15). Average period to healing of superficial burns treated with AWBAT-S (n=15 patients with n=18 wounds) was 8.1 days, σ =2.48, with a range of 5–13 days and a median of 7 days. Pain rating at 24 hours was 1.5, σ =0.85 (n=10) and at 48 hours mean was 1.75, σ =0.89 (n=8). There was zero incidence of hematoma/seroma. No infections were seen. Results indicate that AWBAT was easily applied with good initial adherence. It was noted to be transparent, conformant, and pliable. Discussion: Early experience demonstrates that AWBAT performs well on donor sites and superficial partial-thickness burns and delivers the desired attributes of a temporary skin substitute including good adherence, infection control, transparency, adapatability, and pain control.
AWBATTM is a newly designed advanced wound care product intended to satisfy the desired attributes of a temporary skin substitute. AWBAT consists of a thin silicone-nylon membrane with porcine type 1 collagen peptides embedded in the nylon. AWBAT is manufactured in such a way that the continuity of the 3-dimensional nylon structure over the entire surface of the dressing is unharmed. AWBAT was cleared by the Food and Drug Administration in February 2009 and is available in 3 configurations: AWBAT-D, intended for donor sites after hemostasis has been established; AWBAT-S, intended for clean, superficial burn wounds; and AWBAT-M for use as a protective covering for meshed autografts. AWBAT was evaluated in an early clinical experience program between May and July 2009. Thirteen surgeons at 8 burn centers across the United States participated in this program.
AWBAT-D was evaluated for use on donor sites, and AWBAT-S was evaluated on clean, superficial burns.
Two configurations of AWBATTM are reported in this article. Both AWBAT-D and AWBAT-S consist of a thin silicone-nylone membrane with porcine type 1 collagen peptides embedded in the nylon. The primary difference in the 2 configurations is the porosity. AWBAT-D is approximately 9% porous, whereas AWBAT-S is approximately 5.5% porous.
AWBAT-D was evaluated in patients requiring the harvest of donor sites for skin grafting of full-thickness burns, and AWBAT-S was evaluated in patients requiring treatment of clean, superficial burns. Each group will be described in detail.
Following surgical preparation and draping, donor sites were harvested using a dermatome. Depth of grafts ranged from 0.008 in to 0.015 in. Both tumescent and nontumescent techniques were used. Once harvested, hemostasis was achieved using a variety of techniques including epinephrine soaks and fibrin sealants. AWBAT-D was then placed on the hemostatic wound with the nylon/collagen (dull) side down and silicone (shiny) side up. Anchoring one edge, the product was smoothed over the wound to minimize wrinkling. Various anchoring methods including steri-strips, surgical staples, sutures, and liquid adhesives were used. An outer absorptive dressing was then placed over the secured AWBAT-D. Various products were used including an Exu-DryTM pad or an ABD pad. The outer dressings were held in place with a KerlixTM roll followed by an ace wrap. Patients were examined at 24 to 48 hours and evaluated for hematoma/seroma formation, level of pain, and signs of infection. In addition to these clinical parameters, the product was evaluated for physical characteristics including ease of application, adherence, and transparency. Patients were then followed until the donor sites were healed to document the number of days it took to heal the wound.
Superficial partial-thickness burns were treated with AWBAT-S. First, blisters, loose skin, and debris were removed from the burn wound. AWBAT-S was placed onto the wound with the nylon/collagen (dull) side down and silicone (shiny) side up. It was gently stretched and smoothed over the open wound to minimize wrinkling. Various anchoring methods were used including steri-strips, surgical staples, sutures, and liquid adhesives. An outer absorptive dressing was then placed over the secured AWBAT-S. Various products were used including an Exu-DryTM pad or an ABD pad. The outer dressings were held in place with a KerlixTM roll followed by an ace wrap. Patients were examined at 24 to 48 hours and evaluated for hematoma/seroma formation, level of pain, and signs of infection. In addition to these clinical parameters, the product was evaluated for physical characteristics including ease of application, adherence, and transparency. Patients were then followed until the donor sites were healed in order to document the number of days it took to heal the wound.
At the time of application, the product was evaluated for a number of physical characteristics and qualities including transparency, adherence, and ease of application. In the following days, the wounds were evaluated for hematoma or seroma formation, as well as signs of infection. The primary end point was days to healing of the wound. Inpatients were evaluated for healing daily. Outpatients were evaluated at routine clinic visits. All patients were asked to evaluate their pain on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 defined as no pain and 10 defined as being the worst pain ever experienced.
The initial clinical experience in donor sites and superficial partial-thickness burns consisted of 45 patients with a total of 69 wounds. AWBAT-D was used in 26 patients on a total of 34 wounds. AWBAT-S was used in 19 patients on a total of 35 wounds.
The experience using AWBAT-D for donor site wounds resulted in a total of 22 evaluable patients with 26 wounds. Data from 4 patients are not included as 2 patients had the AWBAT-D removed at day 6 per burn center donor site protocol, 1 patient expired, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up after surgery. Results are summarized in Table Table11.
The range of days to healing was 8 to 15, the mean days to healing was 11.3 (SD = 1.95), and median was 11.0 days. Pain was evaluated at 24 and 48 hours. At 24 hours, the mean pain rating was 1.2 (SD = 0.43) (n = 18), and at 48 hours, the mean was 1.2 (SD = 0.46) (n = 15). No hematomas or seromas were noted. Importantly, there were no infections reported. The physical properties of AWBAT-D were also evaluated. Characteristics evaluated included the ease of application and the initial adherence of the product. In the 34 wounds covered with AWBAT-D, the ease of application was excellent (n = 27) and good (n = 7) in 100% of the patients treated. The initial adherence was excellent (n = 17) and good (n = 17) in 100% of the patients treated. In addition, AWBAT-D was consistently noted to be transparent, conformant to the wound, and pliable (see Fig Fig11).
The experience with AWBAT-S resulted in a total of 15 evaluable patients with 21 wounds. Data from 4 patients is not included as 1 patient with excellent initial results of good adherence of the AWBAT-S over a 24% TBSA removed all the product at day 2 while in delirium tremens (DTs), 1 patient expired, 1 patient was lost to follow-up after surgery, and 1 patient had AWBAT-S removed by the surgeon due to nonadherence on a deep wound. Results are summarized in Table Table22.
The range of days to healing was 5 to 13, the mean days to healing was 8.1 (SD = 2.48), and the median was 7.0 days. Pain was evaluated at 24 and 48 hours using a pain scale of 1 to 10. At 24 hours, the mean pain rating was 1.5 (SD = 0.85) (n = 10) and at 48 hours, the mean was 1.75 (SD = 0.89) (n = 8). No hematomas or seromas were noted. Importantly, there were no infections reported.
The physical characteristics evaluated included the ease of application and the initial adherence of the product. Of the 35 wounds covered with AWBAT-S, the ease of application was excellent (n = 15) or good (n = 15) on 86% of the patients treated and fair (n = 5) in 13% of patients treated. The initial adherence was excellent (n = 9) or good (n = 26) in 100% of patients. In addition, AWBAT-S was consistently noted to be transparent, conformant to the wound, and pliable (see Fig Fig22).
Further examination of the data was done to see what impact anesthesia and tumescence had on healing rates. Patients undergoing surgery for donor sites all had general anesthesia. Approximately half of the donor sites were harvested using a tumescent technique. The average time to healing for the tumesced group was 11.3 days whereas the nontumesced group's average time to healing was 11.0 day. Patients with superficial burns received either general anesthesia or Ketamine. The average time to healing for the general anesthesia group was 7.5 days and for the Ketamine group it was 9.3 days.
Burn injury results in the loss of integrity of the skin. The need for an ideal skin substitute is well understood while the quest for an ideal skin substitute has been ongoing for decades. Since 1979, when the Food and Drug Administration cleared the first biologically based wound dressing (Biobrane) the search has continued. The ideal properties of a synthetic wound dressing or biologic skin substitute have been outlined by numerous authors.1-4 The desirable properties include rapid and sustained adherence, moisture permeability, no increase in infection, conformance to surface irregularities, transparency, physical adaptability, minimization of patient discomfort, safety, and stability.
Early clinical experience data with AWBAT were collected from 8 burn centers across the United States. The product evaluation process addressed the desired qualities of an advanced wound care product for use in burn centers.
AWBAT was noted to have excellent to good initial adherence in 92.8% of applications. Complications such as hematoma/seroma formation under biological dressings can complicate the postoperative course, leading to the need for evacuation of the fluid or removal of the dressing. Fluid collection can inhibit adherence and may also lead to infection. AWBAT is highly porous and features nylon that provides a contiguous 3-dimensional structure. It allows fluid to pass through the pores thereby minimizing fluid accumulation once placed on the wound. Fluid passes through the AWBAT into an outer absorptive dressing as noted in Figure Figure22A.
The physical characteristics of AWBAT were also evaluated. This included transparency, conformance of the product to the wound, and pliability. AWBAT was consistently noted to be transparent, conformable to the wound, and pliable.
Among the numerous clinical observations made during the program, perhaps the most clinically significant was the rapid healing of donor site wounds. Healing was observed in 8 to 15 days. On some wounds, particularly outpatients, it was observed that the material could have been removed sooner because of this rapid healing process (Fig (Fig1C).1C). When removing AWBAT-D from a wound that appeared to be healed, application of a petrolatum-based product or soaking was effective. In addition, because of the rapid healing, it should be noted that the range of days to healing might be overstated in the program statistics.
Another important clinical observation was that without exception AWBAT was used as a primary, single application dressing. In all cases, it remained on the wound until healing was complete. Single application dressings typically reduce the need for multiple dressing changes and thereby the associated costs and patient discomfort. Cost data were not specifically tracked in this program; therefore, no specific conclusions can be drawn regarding cost savings.
Data were collected on the patient's perception of pain from those patients who were able to verbalize. The data clearly indicate that patients treated with AWBAT had very low postoperative pain scores. In addition, there were many anecdotal comments from the burn care teams regarding the minimal level of pain in patients treated with AWBAT.
Evaluation of AWBAT is continuing in multicenter, comparative trials.
AWBAT performs well as a donor site dressing and as a treatment of superficial partial-thickness burns. Early evaluation indicates that AWBAT delivers the desired attributes of an advanced wound burn dressing, including good adherence, moisture control, transparency, and physical adaptability. Importantly, AWBAT performed strongly in the areas of infection control and pain management.