PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Am J Obstet Gynecol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 1, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2847630
NIHMSID: NIHMS169280
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Obstetrical Outcomes and Care: Prevalence and Determinants
Allison S. BRYANT, MD, MPH, Ayaba WORJOLOH, MD, MPH, Aaron B. CAUGHEY, MD, PhD, and A. Eugene WASHINGTON, MD, MSc
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA
Corresponding Author: Allison Bryant, MD, MPH Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences University of California, San Francisco 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0132 San Francisco, CA 94143-0132 ; bryanta/at/obgyn.ucsf.edu 415-476-3910
Wide disparities in obstetrical outcomes exist between women of different race/ethnicities. The prevalence of preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, fetal demise, maternal mortality and inadequate receipt of prenatal care all vary by maternal race/ethnicity. These disparities have their roots in maternal health behaviors, genetics, the physical and social environments, and access to and quality of health care. Elimination of the health inequities due to sociocultural differences or access to or quality of health care will require a multidisciplinary approach. We aim to describe these obstetrical disparities, with an eye towards potential etiologies, thereby improving our ability to target appropriate solutions.
Keywords: disparities, maternal mortality, obstetrical care, preterm birth, race/ethnicity
Profound racial and ethnic disparities have been documented in many areas of health and health care1-3. Attempts to rectify these inequities in outcomes and processes of care must begin with an accurate account of their prevalence, and with some attention to potential etiologies. Unfortunately, disparities in obstetrical outcomes and care have persisted over time4-6. Here, we aim to summarize these obstetrical disparities and their possible origins, with the hope of driving an agenda to resolve them.
The manner in which disparities in health and health care should be defined is not always straightforward. In an argument to standardize the definition, Lê Cook and colleagues describe three definitions of disparities in health care.7 In the first, proposed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, disparities are defined by the mathematical difference in means or proportions between groups, without the use of statistical models. In the second, the Residual Direct Effect method, disparities are defined by differences which persist after accounting for all measured potential confounding variables. The last definition, preferred by the authors, is that used by the Institute of Medicine, in which disparities are seen as differences above and beyond those that can be explained by differences in health status between groups. Thus far, in investigations into obstetrical disparities, the methodologies described in the first two definitions have been most common. It should be a goal in the field to design studies that also seek to use the third, as this method is best able to highlight those disparities which might be amenable to interventions to reduce them.
The distinction between disparities in health outcomes and disparities in health care deserve mention. Both exist in obstetrics and both will be explored here. In general, disparities in health care are thought to contribute, though not exclusively, to disparities in health outcomes.
McGinnis and colleagues proposed that population health status, as measured by premature mortality, is contributed to by five domains, either individually or in conjunction with one another. The domains include behavioral patterns, which they estimate account for 40% of early deaths, genetic predispositions (30%), social circumstances (15%), environmental exposures (5%), and shortfalls in medical care (10%)8, 9. We propose that disparities in health status can also be considered using this framework. In this paper, we will outline major disparities in the outcomes most clearly associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and will discuss the relative contributions of each of these domains, as indicated by our review of the relevant literature. We will also examine inequalities in obstetrical care, whether in access to or quality of care. Table 1 presents a summary of our findings regarding racial/ethnic disparities in these outcomes, while Table 2 presents a summary of the strength of the evidence for contribution of each of the above-mentioned domains to these disparities.
Table 1
Table 1
Disparities in pregnancy outcome, maternal outcome and obstetrical care, by race/ethnicity.
Table 2
Table 2
Strength of the evidence for contributions of health domains to racial/ethnic disparities in pregnancy outcome
For the purposes of this discussion, we will refer mostly to the maternal race/ethnicity categories of Asian/Pacific Islanders, black, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaska Native and white. For most comparisons, White women serve as the referent group, merely to maintain consistency with the majority of the published literature on obstetrical disparities.
Pregnancy Outcomes
Congenital abnormalities
The most consistent racial/ethnic difference in prevalence of congenital abnormalities appears to be a higher incidence of neural tube defects (NTD), including spina bifida and anencephaly, among Hispanic women.10-13 Williams and colleagues calculated a recent birth prevalence of spina bifida of 4.18 per 10,000 births among Hispanic women, as compared with 3.37 and 2.90 per 10,000 for non-Hispanic white and black women, respectively, similar to the findings of other studies14. In contrast, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found a similar prevalence of spina bifida for Hispanic and white women. Although Hispanic women are at higher risk of NTD in most studies, adequate intake of folic acid remains low in this group15-17, despite the 1998 FDA mandate to fortify all cereal grains in the United States. A difference in carrier frequencies of genetic polymorphisms associated with folate metabolism, among others, has been proposed as a mechanism for the increased risk of NTD among Hispanic women, but findings have been inconsistent18-21. Ascertainment of the true incidence of congenital abnormalities by race/ethnicity may be difficult, due to known differences in rates of prenatal diagnosis among women of different backgrounds, as well as differential rates of pregnancy termination for diagnosed anomalies22-28.
Fetal Demise
Despite improvements in fetal death rates in the United States over time, significant racial disparities still persist. In 2004, the overall fetal death rate was 6.2 deaths per 1,000 live births and fetal deaths; the rate for blacks (11.3/1,000) was more than twice than for non-Hispanic whites (5.0/1,000)29. Rates for Hispanic women, Asian/Pacific Islanders and American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) did not differ much from that of whites. A review of fetal death rates for women enrolled in a large, prospective study of singleton pregnancies demonstrated an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for fetal death < 24 weeks gestation of 3.2 (95% CI [2.2, 4.8]) for black women as compared to white women, and of 3.1 [1.5, 6.2] for fetal death ≥ 24 weeks gestation30. Hispanic women and women of other races did not have fetal death rates significantly different than whites. The investigators adjusted their models for various maternal factors and pregnancy exposures and the cohort was remarkable in that all women had to have had initiation of prenatal care in the first trimester to be eligible for inclusion. These findings raise the possibility of contributions of unmeasured maternal social conditions and behaviors, quality of obstetrical care content and biological constructs to disparities in fetal demise.
Preterm Birth
While congenital malformations and chromosomal disorders are the leading cause of infant mortality in the United States among most racial and ethnic groups, preterm birth/low birth weight is the most common cause of infant death for black and Puerto Rican (but not other Hispanic) women31. It has been estimated that disparities in extremely preterm births are attributable for 80% of the black-white disparity in infant mortality32. The overall rate of preterm birth in the U.S. in 2006 was 12.8%; black (18.4%) and American Indian/ Alaska Native (14.1%) women have the highest risk of preterm delivery, as compared with white (11.7%), Asian/Pacific Islanders (10.9%) and Hispanic women (12.2%)33.
A recent investigation sought to explain racial and ethnic disparities in preterm birth using methodology akin to the “Residual Direct Effect” method, in a nationally representative birth sample. The author notes that in logistic regression models which account for biologic, sociodemographic and behavioral factors in a stepwise fashion, the addition of behavioral factors (adequacy of prenatal care, pregnancy weight gain, use of prenatal vitamins, smoking and alcohol use) in the final model completely attenuates any residual increased risk of preterm birth for black women as compared with white women34. This was not the case for American Indian/Alaska Native women, who had twice the odds of preterm birth as compared with white women after adjustment.
There has been increasing interest in explorations of genetic contributions to racial/ethnic disparities in preterm birth. Most have focused on identifying candidate genes involved in inflammatory pathways. A recent review of this topic summarizes the literature to date, including evidence that polymorphisms in maternal and fetal genes for tumor necrosis factor, IL-1 and IL-6 may be associated with an excess risk of preterm premature rupture of the membranes and spontaneous preterm birth among black women35. Such genetic differences may modify the risk of preterm birth associated with genital tract infections among black women36, 37, in an example of possible gene-environment interaction.
Results of studies that examine differences in adverse outcomes between foreign-born and United States-born women of the same race/ethnicity demonstrate the need to look beyond a genetic explanation for disparities in obstetrics. In 2002, the CDC reported that foreign-born women had better birth outcomes than their U.S.-born racial/ethnic counterparts despite later initiation of prenatal care and less education38, similar to findings from other national- and state-level data 39-44: compared with their U.S.-born equivalents foreign-born blacks, Asians, Hispanics and Filipinos have lower infant mortality, low birth weight, and preterm births.
The role of social circumstances such as poverty and maternal stress has been explored as contributors to disparities in preterm birth. Poor socioeconomic conditions at the individual and neighborhood levels are associated with prematurity, and may modify the effect of race on preterm birth risk45-50. Hispanic women, who often have socioeconomic statuses similar to that of black women, on average, have notably better birth outcomes4, 51, 52, a phenomenon often referred to as the “Hispanic paradox.” However, evidence exists that with acculturation comes worse birth outcomes for Hispanic women53-56, a fact which may explain higher rates of preterm birth among Puerto Ricans, who may have had longer exposure to mainland U.S. culture, as compared with recent immigrants from Mexico and Central America56.
Maternal stress also contributes to preterm birth risk57-60, and black and American Indian/ Alaska Native women are most likely to report exposure to chronic stressors during pregnancy57. The search for a biological explanation for the pathways through which stress might affect preterm birth risk has led to an extensive literature on the role of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) as a potential mediator of this relationship. While some studies have shown higher levels of CRH in women destined to have a preterm birth, these findings have not been consistent61-66. It remains likely, however, that neuroendocrine pathways underlie the relationship between acute and chronic stressors on preterm birth and low birth weight risk. An interesting line of investigation explores the role of maternal perceived racism on preterm delivery risk; most studies find that life experiences with racism, as well as living in especially segregated residential areas, increase the risk of adverse birth outcomes67-73, a fact which may help to explain racial and ethnic disparities in these outcomes.
Fetal Growth Restriction
Black women are more likely to experience fetal growth restriction (FGR), a significant contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality, than are women of other races and ethnicities74-79. Factors such as maternal pre-pregnancy weight and nutrition, substance abuse and exposure to cigarette smoke, and maternal health status prior to pregnancy have been shown to contribute to fetal growth. Black and American Indian/ Alaska Native women are more likely to have inadequate weight gain during pregnancy 4, 79, 80; some evidence suggests that black women are more likely than others to decrease their risk of FGR by achieving adequate weight gain during pregnancy81. Black women are more likely than other groups to experience food insecurity during pregnancy82; participation in such public programs such as the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children may have a beneficial effect on FGR risk among women79. Historical factors such as maternal low-birth weight has also been shown to be a risk factor for FGR among black women, but does not fully explain the disparity between groups83.
Use of substances such as tobacco and alcohol during pregnancy is known to increase the risk of FGR. White women are more likely to use tobacco4 and white women and American Indian/ Alaska Native women more likely to use alcohol during pregnancy than are other groups84, 85. However, it appears that minority (American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, black and Hispanic) women may be less likely to discontinue use during pregnancy than are white women85-87 and for smoking, third trimester exposure may be more predictive of poor fetal growth88.
Several investigators have found an association between other environmental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and pesticides, and small for gestational age neonates89-92. Racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to live and work in areas with greater exposure to such agents93-96. The impact of several of these substances seems to be modified by race/ethnicity, having been found to contribute to growth restriction among black Americans but not Dominican Americans in studies conducted in New York City89, 92. Authors who have found this association suggest that protective factors among Hispanic immigrants may outweigh adverse effects of environmental pollutants, as has been argued in other instances of the “Hispanic paradox.”89 As with preterm birth, social isolation and deprivation appear also to play a role in the risk of FGR45, 97.
Maternal Outcomes
Maternal Mortality
Pregnancy-related mortality, though rare, is on the rise in the United States. In 2005, the death rates for white women was 11.7 per 100,000 live births, 9.6 for Hispanic women and 39.2 for non-Hispanic black women98. To compare, the Healthy People 2010 goal for maternal deaths is 3.3/100,000 live births99. Tucker and colleagues attempt to understand whether higher rates of pregnancy-related mortality among black women is due to a higher prevalence of certain high-risk conditions, versus a higher risk of death from these conditions (or both). They found that black women in a national sample did not have a higher prevalence of preeclampsia/eclamspia, postpartum hemorrhage, placenta previa or placental abruption, but for all five conditions, black women had a case-fatality rate 2.4 – 3.3 times higher than that of white women100. This case-fatality ratio accounted for the majority of the disparity in mortality. The authors were not able to comment upon differences in severity of conditions, presence of co-morbidities or timing or quality of care received, but postulate that any of these might contribute to this black-white disparity. Harper and colleagues examined some of these variables in their investigation of black and white women with pregnancy-related morbidity in North Carolina. Black women had higher degrees of hypertension, lower hemoglobin levels on admission, and had presented for prenatal care later, on average, than white women. Black women were no more likely to have a chronic medical condition, were more likely to be obese and to use cocaine and were less likely to smoke. In the cohort with obstetrical hemorrhage, black women were less likely to undergo a surgical intervention, though there were no differences in medical management or the likelihood of transfusion, suggesting similar severity of disease.
Maternal morbidity
Black women are more likely to experience morbidity during pregnancy. In California, black women had an adjusted odds ratio for one or more maternal morbidities of 1.25 [1.23–1.27] as compared with white women101. Asian and Hispanic women had lower risks of maternal morbidities as compared with white women. Asian women are at particular risk of third and fourth degree lacerations (AOR 1.36 [1.32–1.40]), considered a metric of obstetric care quality101.
Black women are more likely to experience hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, some of which may be attributable to excess cases of pre-pregnancy hypertension30, 102-104. While black women have the highest risks of pregnancy-related hypertension, among Asian women, Filipina and Samoan women have risks higher than women from other subgroups105-107, arguing for the careful and thorough collection of race/ethnicity data for the purposes of assessing maternal risk. Thus far, little data exist regarding racial differences in biological mediators of preeclampsia, such as endothelial dysfunction or responsiveness to angiotensin, to explain disparities in hypertensive disorders, but more investigation in this area is warranted. There is also evidence that paternal race/ethnicity may be associated with preeclampsia with Asian paternity associated with a reduction in the risk and racial/ethnic discordance between parents associated with a small increased risk108.
Wide variations in risk of diabetes in pregnancy exist by race/ethnicity. As compared with white women, racial/ethnic minorities are at higher risk of entering pregnancy with pre-existing diabetes, and Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander women are at particularly high risk for the development of gestational diabetes109. Among Asians, women of Filipina and Native Hawaiian descent appear to be at highest risk 105-107, 110, and data suggest that these women are more likely than white women or women of other Asian groups to have macrosomic infants in the setting of gestational diabetes111. There is also evidence that pregnancies of white women fathered by Asian men are at increased risk of gestational diabetes as well, suggesting potential biologic or nutritional explanations112.
Disparities similarly exist in the prevalence and severity of other maternal morbidities in pregnancy, such as asthma, connective tissue diseases, HIV, genitourinary infections and periodontal disease, with evidence that minorities, in particular black women, with these conditions fare worse in pregnancy than do their white counterparts113-119. Disparities in maternal obesity in pregnancy deserve special mention. Racial/ethnic minorities are at increased risk of prepregnancy overweight and obesity, and these conditions are associated with an ever-growing list of pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, fetal death, macrosomia, gestational diabetes and cesarean delivery120-123. Furthermore, the effects of obesity on the pregnancy and the severity of outcomes at higher BMIs may differ by racial/ethnic group124-126 Contributors to maternal overweight and obesity are many, including poor nutrition and physical and built environments which are not conducive to exercise, and are often more prevalent among minority populations. The contribution of genetics and in utero exposures to later childhood and adult obesity are also an area of active investigation127-129.
Few agreed-upon measures of quality of obstetrical care currently exist for evaluation of disparities in care quality130. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Healthcare Disparities Report uses a set of measures to describe quality of care across a variety of settings. While other areas in medicine have numerous available measures, the single measure that reflects quality of obstetrical care in this report is the proportion of women who receive prenatal care in the first trimester1. White women and Asian/Pacific Islanders are most likely to receive early prenatal care1. In 2006, 69.0% of women received prenatal care in the first trimester; these proportions were 76.2%, 58.4% and 57.7% for whites, blacks and Hispanics, respectively4. Contributors to late entry into prenatal care are myriad, and include concerns such as lack of education and insurance coverage, ambivalence about pregnancy and negative perceptions of health care providers and staff131-135. Black women are more likely than women from other groups to have unintended pregnancies; women with unintended pregnancies are more likely to present late to care134, 135. Black and Hispanic women in the United States are also more likely to be poor and reliant upon public insurance sources. Many of these women are not eligible for Medicaid before pregnancy but become so by virtue of different income eligibility standards set in pregnancy; however, the application process for pregnancy-related coverage may present a barrier to early initiation of care131.
Women who fail to present for prenatal care entirely are at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and are more likely to be non-White136-139. Whether maternal behaviors such as late or lack of entry into prenatal care explain a significant portion of racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes is not clear. In one study, stepwise adjustment for maternal behavioral constructs (prenatal care initiation, tobacco use, alcohol use, among others) did not mitigate the effect of Black race on preterm birth risk140, in another study, however, the effects of race on preterm birth were nearly eliminated after adjustment for prenatal care adequacy138, while in a third, an interaction between race and prenatal care's effects on birth outcomes is suggested141
Other potential quality measures to consider include the primary cesarean delivery rate, prevalence of major obstetrical lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage and puerperal infection, the latter three of which are considered intrapartum care-sensitive conditions. Several studies have documented higher risks of cesarean delivery among non-white women as compared with white women, even after adjusting for features known to be risk factors, such as maternal age, socioeconomic status, pre-existing chronic disease and obstetric complications such as preeclampsia and macrosomia 142-146. These studies raise a question of unmeasured confounding bias; that is, that factors may exist which are associated with both race/ethnicity and cesarean delivery risk that have been thus far unable to be captured by available data. Potential examples of these might include patient preference, or biological factors which increase the risk of “nonreassuring fetal testing” in some populations. Consideration should also be given to the contribution of provider bias in the cesarean delivery rate.
As mentioned previously, Asian women are at increased risk of severe perineal laceration101. In one study, after adjustment for maternal age, operative vaginal delivery, birth weight and episiotomy, race remained an independent predictor of third or fourth degree laceration, with Asian women having twice the odds of such a laceration as compared with white women147.
Disparities in the prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage, a potential quality measure, have been described. Women of Asian race101, 148 and Hispanic ethnicity148, 149 have been noted to have higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage. Lastly, rates of puerperal infection have been shown to be higher in Asian, black and Hispanic as compared with white women, after adjustment for other factors, ranging from AORs of 1.16 [1.08-1.25] for Asians to 2.35 [2.21-2.49] for black women101.
As in other fields of medicine, obstetrical outcomes differ by maternal race/ethnicity. These disparities ultimately contribute to disparate rates of infant and maternal mortality, and thereby reflect the overall health status of the communities in which women and their families live. While some disparities may have their origins in biology and therefore may not be modifiable in the short term, a great many more may be rooted in maternal health behaviors and the physical and social environments, all of which should be viewed as targets for change. Health care itself plays a clear role in health disparities2, and health care policy and quality improvement efforts should aim to broaden access and elevate the quality of obstetrical care available to all women. As yet, clear quality standards for the provision of preconception, prenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care are lacking; creation of such guidelines will provide better benchmarks for quality and equality of obstetrical care.
Future obstetrical disparities work should move beyond descriptions of mathematical differences in prevalences of conditions between populations, to a more sophisticated approach to explaining disparities and identifying targets for improvement. Recent work has demonstrated that selection bias may result in findings biased toward the null hypothesis of no effect in observational cohort studies of socioeconomic disparities in outcomes150. Examinations of obstetrical disparities should take this into account and should consider population-based approaches or including sensitivity analyses to explore possible selection biases. Quantitative research should seek to accurately measure and take into consideration potential variables which might confound the relationship between race/ethnicity and outcomes of interest. In addition, patient preference and need must also be taken into account in order to identify true disparities above and beyond these constructs. Some of this exploration would also benefit from the collection of qualitative data, particularly in regards to patient preference and potential provider biases. In time, and with targeted clinical, research and health policy efforts (in addition to broader social policy efforts in areas such as education, environmental justice and poverty), we can strive towards a decrement in these obstetrical disparities specifically, and in inequities in health and health care more generally.
Acknowledgments
This publication was supported by NIH/NCRR/OD UCSF-CTSI Grant Number KL2 RR024130 (ASB). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. ASB is also supported by the Amos Medical Faculty Development Award of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Condensation
Widespread racial/ethnic disparities exist in obstetrics; documenting them and understanding potential etiologies will increase the likelihood of eliminating them.
1. AHRQ National healthcare disparities report. Rockville, MD: 2003.
2. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Insitute of Medicine; Washington, DC: 2003.
3. Healthy people 2010. 2nd ed. US Department of Health and Human Services; Washington, DC: 2000.
4. Births: Final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;56(6):1–103.
5. Alexander GR, Wingate MS, Bader D, Kogan MD. The increasing racial disparity in infant mortality rates: composition and contributors to recent US trends. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):51, e1–9. [PubMed]
6. Bryant AS, Washington S, Kuppermann M, Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Quality and equality in obstetric care: racial and ethnic differences in caesarean section delivery rates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(5):454–62. [PubMed]
7. Le Cook B, McGuire TG, Zuvekas SH. Measuring trends in racial/ ethnic health care disparities. Med Care Res Rev. 2009;66(1):23–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. Jama. 1993;270(18):2207–12. [PubMed]
9. McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(2):78–93. [PubMed]
10. Canfield MA, Honein MA, Yuskiv N, et al. National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999-2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76(11):747–56. [PubMed]
11. Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Kaidarova Z. Congenital malformations in offspring of Hispanic and African-American women in California, 1989-1997. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004;70(6):382–8. [PubMed]
12. Canfield MA, Marengo L, Ramadhani TA, Suarez L, Brender JD, Scheuerle A. The prevalence and predictors of anencephaly and spina bifida in Texas. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(1):41–50. [PubMed]
13. Velie EM, Shaw GM, Malcoe LH, et al. Understanding the increased risk of neural tube defect-affected pregnancies among Mexico-born women in California: immigration and anthropometric factors. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(3):219–30. [PubMed]
14. Williams LJ, Rasmussen SA, Flores A, Kirby RS, Edmonds LD. Decline in the prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly by race/ethnicity: 1995-2002. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):580–6. [PubMed]
15. Trends in folic acid supplement intake among women of reproductive age--California, 2002-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(42):1106–9. [PubMed]
16. Yang QH, Carter HK, Mulinare J, Berry RJ, Friedman JM, Erickson JD. Race-ethnicity differences in folic acid intake in women of childbearing age in the United States after folic acid fortification: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(5):1409–16. [PubMed]
17. Bentley TG, Willett WC, Weinstein MC, Kuntz KM. Population-level changes in folate intake by age, gender, and race/ethnicity after folic acid fortification. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(11):2040–7. [PubMed]
18. Volcik KA, Blanton SH, Tyerman GH, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and spina bifida: evaluation of level of defect and maternal genotypic risk in Hispanics. Am J Med Genet. 2000;95(1):21–7. [PubMed]
19. Garcia-Fragoso L, Garcia-Garcia I, de la Vega A, Renta J, Cadilla CL. Presence of the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T mutation in Puerto Rican patients with neural tube defects. J Child Neurol. 2002;17(1):30–2. [PubMed]
20. Barber R, Shalat S, Hendricks K, et al. Investigation of folate pathway gene polymorphisms and the incidence of neural tube defects in a Texas hispanic population. Mol Genet Metab. 2000;70(1):45–52. [PubMed]
21. Zhu H, Enaw JO, Ma C, Shaw GM, Lammer EJ, Finnell RH. Association between CFL1 gene polymorphisms and spina bifida risk in a California population. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8:12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Crider KS, Olney RS, Cragan JD. Trisomies 13 and 18: population prevalences, characteristics, and prenatal diagnosis, metropolitan Atlanta, 1994-2003. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146(7):820–6. [PubMed]
23. Siffel C, Correa A, Cragan J, Alverson CJ. Prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy terminations and prevalence of Down syndrome in Atlanta. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004;70(9):565–71. [PubMed]
24. Forrester MB, Merz RD. Prenatal diagnosis and elective termination of neural tube defects in Hawaii, 1986-1997. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2000;15(3):146–51. [PubMed]
25. Bishop J, Huether CA, Torfs C, Lorey F, Deddens J. Epidemiologic study of Down syndrome in a racially diverse California population, 1989-1991. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(2):134–47. [PubMed]
26. Press N, Browner CH. Characteristics of women who refuse an offer of prenatal diagnosis: data from the California maternal serum alpha fetoprotein blood test experience. Am J Med Genet. 1998;78(5):433–45. [PubMed]
27. Kuppermann M, Gates E, Washington AE. Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge? Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(5 Pt 1):675–82. [PubMed]
28. Kuppermann M, Learman LA, Gates E, et al. Beyond race or ethnicity and socioeconomic status: predictors of prenatal testing for Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1087–97. [PubMed]
29. MacDorman MF, Munson ML, Kirmeyer S. Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56(3):1–19. [PubMed]
30. Healy AJ, Malone FD, Sullivan LM, et al. Early access to prenatal care: implications for racial disparity in perinatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(3):625–31. [PubMed]
31. Mathews T, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2003 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006;54(16):1–30. [PubMed]
32. Schempf AH, Branum AM, Lukacs SL, Schoendorf KC. The contribution of preterm birth to the Black-White infant mortality gap, 1990 and 2000. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1255–60. [PubMed]
33. Mathews T, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2005 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008;57(2):1–32. [PubMed]
34. Sparks PJ. Do biological, sociodemographic, and behavioral characteristics explain racial/ethnic disparities in preterm births? Soc Sci Med. 2009 [PubMed]
35. Anum EA, Springel EH, Shriver MD, Strauss JF., 3rd Genetic Contributions to Disparities in Preterm Birth. Pediatr Res. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Macones GA, Parry S, Elkousy M, Clothier B, Ural SH, Strauss JF., 3rd A polymorphism in the promoter region of TNF and bacterial vaginosis: preliminary evidence of gene-environment interaction in the etiology of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1504–8. discussion 3A. [PubMed]
37. Hitti J, Nugent R, Boutain D, Gardella C, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Racial disparity in risk of preterm birth associated with lower genital tract infection. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(4):330–7. [PubMed]
38. State-Specific Trends in U.S. Live Births to Women Born Outside the 50 States and the District of Columbia --- United States, 1990 and 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51(48):1091–5. [PubMed]
39. Singh G, Yu S. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Differences between US- and Foreign Born Women in Major US Racial and Ethnic Groups. Am J Pub Health. 1996;86:837–43. [PubMed]
40. Baker A, Hellerstedt W. Residential racial concentration and birth outcomes by nativity: do neighbors matter? J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98(2):172–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. David RJ, C JW. Differing Birth Weight Among Infants of U.S.-Born Blacks, African Born Blacks and U.S.-Born Whites. NEJM. 1997;337(17):1209–14. [PubMed]
42. Forna F, Jamieson D, Sanders D, Lindsay M. Pregnancy outcomes in foreign-born and US-born women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(3):257–65. [PubMed]
43. Fuentes-Afflick E, Hessol N, Pérez-Stable E. Maternal birthplace, ethnicity and low birth weight in California. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(11):1105–12. [PubMed]
44. Collins J, Martin C. Relation of traditional risk factors to intrauterine growth retardation among United States-born and foreign-born Mexican Americans in Chicago. Ethn Dis. 1998;8(1):21–5. [PubMed]
45. Bell JF, Zimmerman FJ, Almgren GR, Mayer JD, Huebner CE. Birth outcomes among urban African-American women: a multilevel analysis of the role of racial residential segregation. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(12):3030–45. [PubMed]
46. Kramer MR, Hogue CR. Place matters: variation in the black/white very preterm birth rate across U.S. metropolitan areas, 2002-2004. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(5):576–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Messer LC, Vinikoor LC, Laraia BA, et al. Socioeconomic domains and associations with preterm birth. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(8):1247–57. [PubMed]
48. Masi CM, Hawkley LC, Piotrowski ZH, Pickett KE. Neighborhood economic disadvantage, violent crime, group density, and pregnancy outcomes in a diverse, urban population. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(12):2440–57. [PubMed]
49. Reagan PB, Salsberry PJ. Race and ethnic differences in determinants of preterm birth in the USA: broadening the social context. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(10):2217–28. [PubMed]
50. Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Dole N, Siega-Riz AM, Thorp JM, Jr., Kaczor DT. Poverty, education, race, and pregnancy outcome. Ethn Dis. 2004;14(3):322–9. [PubMed]
51. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Infant Mortality --- United States, 1995--2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(22):553–6. [PubMed]
52. Zambrana RE, Dunkel-Schetter C, Collins NL, Scrimshaw SC. Mediators of ethnic-associated differences in infant birth weight. J Urban Health. 1999;76(1):102–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Ruiz RJ, Dolbier CL, Fleschler R. The relationships among acculturation, biobehavioral risk, stress, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and poor birth outcomes in Hispanic women. Ethn Dis. 2006;16(4):926–32. [PubMed]
54. Ruiz RJ, Saade GR, Brown CE, et al. The effect of acculturation on progesterone/estriol ratios and preterm birth in Hispanics. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 Pt 1):309–16. [PubMed]
55. Zambrana RE, Scrimshaw SC, Collins N, Dunkel-Schetter C. Prenatal health behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in pregnant women of Mexican origin: the role of acculturation. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(6):1022–6. [PubMed]
56. Rosenberg TJ, Raggio TP, Chiasson MA. A further examination of the “epidemiologic paradox”: birth outcomes among Latinas. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(4):550–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Lu MC, Chen B. Racial and ethnic disparities in preterm birth: the role of stressful life events. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):691–9. [PubMed]
58. Kramer MS, Lydon J, Seguin L, et al. Stress Pathways to Spontaneous Preterm Birth: The Role of Stressors, Psychological Distress, and Stress Hormones. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 [PubMed]
59. Nkansah-Amankra S, Luchok KJ, Hussey JR, Watkins K, Liu X. Effects of Maternal Stress on Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth Outcomes Across Neighborhoods of South Carolina, 2000-2003. Matern Child Health J. 2009 [PubMed]
60. Hobel CJ, Goldstein A, Barrett ES. Psychosocial stress and pregnancy outcome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(2):333–48. [PubMed]
61. Paul K, Boutain D, Agnew K, Thomas J, Hitti J. The relationship between racial identity, income, stress and C-reactive protein among parous women: implications for preterm birth disparity research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100(5):540–6. [PubMed]
62. Hobel CJ, Arora CP, Korst LM. Corticotrophin-releasing hormone and CRH-binding protein. Differences between patients at risk for preterm birth and hypertension. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;897:54–65. [PubMed]
63. Erickson K, Thorsen P, Chrousos G, et al. Preterm birth: associated neuroendocrine, medical, and behavioral risk factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(6):2544–52. [PubMed]
64. Lockwood CJ. Stress-associated preterm delivery: the role of corticotropin-releasing hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(1 Pt 3):S264–6. [PubMed]
65. Fadalti M, Pezzani I, Cobellis L, et al. Placental corticotropin-releasing factor. An update. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;900:89–94. [PubMed]
66. Petraglia F, Hatch MC, Lapinski R, et al. Lack of effect of psychosocial stress on maternal corticotropin-releasing factor and catecholamine levels at 28 weeks’ gestation. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2001;8(2):83–8. [PubMed]
67. Dominguez TP, Dunkel-Schetter C, Glynn LM, Hobel C, Sandman CA. Racial differences in birth outcomes: the role of general, pregnancy, and racism stress. Health Psychol. 2008;27(2):194–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Osypuk TL, Acevedo-Garcia D. Are racial disparities in preterm birth larger in hypersegregated areas? Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(11):1295–304. [PubMed]
69. Dominguez TP. Race, racism, and racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(2):360–70. [PubMed]
70. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Wise LA, Horton NJ, Corwin MJ. Perceptions of racial discrimination and the risk of preterm birth. Epidemiology. 2002;13(6):646–52. [PubMed]
71. Mustillo S, Krieger N, Gunderson EP, Sidney S, McCreath H, Kiefe CI. Self-reported experiences of racial discrimination and Black-White differences in preterm and low-birthweight deliveries: the CARDIA Study. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(12):2125–31. [PubMed]
72. Collins JW, Jr., David RJ, Handler A, Wall S, Andes S. Very low birthweight in African American infants: the role of maternal exposure to interpersonal racial discrimination. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(12):2132–8. [PubMed]
73. Pickett KE, Collins JW, Jr., Masi CM, Wilkinson RG. The effects of racial density and income incongruity on pregnancy outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(10):2229–38. [PubMed]
74. Naeye R. Causes of fetal and neonatal mortality by race in a selected U.S. population. Am J Public Health. 1979;69(9):857–61. [PubMed]
75. Kramer MS, Ananth CV, Platt RW, Joseph KS. US Black vs White disparities in foetal growth: physiological or pathological? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(5):1187–95. [PubMed]
76. Williams RL, Creasy RK, Cunningham GC, Hawes WE, Norris FD, Tashiro M. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59(5):624–32. [PubMed]
77. Zhang J, Bowes WA., Jr Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(2):200–8. [PubMed]
78. Ananth CV, Wen SW. Trends in fetal growth among singleton gestations in the United States and Canada, 1985 through 1998. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26(4):260–7. [PubMed]
79. Frisbie WP, Biegler M, de Turk P, Forbes D, Pullum SG. Racial and ethnic differences in determinants of intrauterine growth retardation and other compromised birth outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(12):1977–83. [PubMed]
80. Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Lahiff M, Abrams B. Weight gain and spontaneous preterm birth: the role of race or ethnicity and previous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1448–55. [PubMed]
81. Hickey CA, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Kohatsu J, Hoffman HJ. Prenatal weight gain, term birth weight, and fetal growth retardation among high-risk multiparous black and white women. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(4):529–35. [PubMed]
82. Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Gundersen C, Dole N. Psychosocial factors and socioeconomic indicators are associated with household food insecurity among pregnant women. J Nutr. 2006;136(1):177–82. [PubMed]
83. Simon DM, Vyas S, Prachand NG, David RJ, Collins JW., Jr Relation of maternal low birth weight to infant growth retardation and prematurity. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(4):321–7. [PubMed]
84. Ethen MK, Ramadhani TA, Scheuerle AE, et al. Alcohol consumption by women before and during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(2):274–85. [PubMed]
85. Harrison PA, Sidebottom AC. Alcohol and drug use before and during pregnancy: an examination of use patterns and predictors of cessation. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(3):386–94. [PubMed]
86. Tenkku LE, Morris DS, Salas J, Xaverius PK. Racial Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Drinking Reduction. Matern Child Health J. 2008 [PubMed]
87. Morris DS, Tenkku LE, Salas J, Xaverius PK, Mengel MB. Exploring pregnancy-related changes in alcohol consumption between black and white women. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32(3):505–12. [PubMed]
88. Lieberman E, Gremy I, Lang J, Cohen A. Low birthweight at term and the timing of fetal exposure to maternal smoking. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1127–31. [PubMed]
89. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera FP. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(5):658–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
90. Dejmek J, Solansky I, Benes I, Lenicek J, Sram RJ. The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine particles on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(12):1159–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Parker JD, Woodruff TJ, Basu R, Schoendorf KC. Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in California. Pediatrics. 2005;115(1):121–8. [PubMed]
92. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, et al. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(2):201–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Wernette D, Nieves L. Breathing polluted air: Minority disproportionately exposedd. EPA J. 1992;18:16–7.
94. Metzger R, Delgado JL, Herrell R. Environmental health and Hispanic children. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103(Suppl 6):25–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Pirkle JL, Flegal KM, Bernert JT, Brody DJ, Etzel RA, Maurer KR. Exposure of the US population to environmental tobacco smoke: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1991. Jama. 1996;275(16):1233–40. [PubMed]
96. Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Kyle AD, Schoendorf KC. Disparities in exposure to air pollution during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(7):942–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
97. Elo IT, Culhane JF, Kohler IV, et al. Neighbourhood deprivation and small-for-gestational-age term births in the United States. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(1):87–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
98. Kung HC, Hoyert DL, Xu J, Murphy SL. Deaths: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008;56(10):1–120. [PubMed]
99. Healthy people 2010 objectives. US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; Washington DC: 1998.
100. Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J. The Black-White disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(2):247–51. [PubMed]
101. Guendelman S, Thornton D, Gould J, Hosang N. Obstetric complications during labor and delivery: assessing ethnic differences in California. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16(4):189–97. [PubMed]
102. Samadi AR, Mayberry RM, Zaidi AA, Pleasant JC, McGhee N, Jr., Rice RJ. Maternal hypertension and associated pregnancy complications among African-American and other women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(4):557–63. [PubMed]
103. Bryant AS, Seely EW, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Patterns of pregnancy-related hypertension in black and white women. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2005;24(3):281–90. [PubMed]
104. Tanaka M, Jaamaa G, Kaiser M, et al. Racial disparity in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in New York State: a 10-year longitudinal population-based study. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):163–70. [PubMed]
105. Wong LF, Caughey AB, Nakagawa S, Kaimal AJ, Tran SH, Cheng YW. Perinatal outcomes among different Asian-American subgroups. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):382, e1–6. [PubMed]
106. Rao AK, Daniels K, El-Sayed YY, Moshesh MK, Caughey AB. Perinatal outcomes among Asian American and Pacific Islander women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):834–8. [PubMed]
107. Rao AK, Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Perinatal complications among different Asian-American subgroups. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):e39–41. [PubMed]
108. Caughey AB, Stotland NE, Washington AE, Escobar GJ. Maternal ethnicity, paternal ethnicity, and parental ethnic discordance: predictors of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(1):156–61. [PubMed]
109. Lawrence JM, Contreras R, Chen W, Sacks DA. Trends in the prevalence of preexisting diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus among a racially/ethnically diverse population of pregnant women, 1999-2005. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(5):899–904. [PubMed]
110. Savitz DA, Janevic TM, Engel SM, Kaufman JS, Herring AH. Ethnicity and gestational diabetes in New York City, 1995-2003. Bjog. 2008;115(8):969–78. [PubMed]
111. Silva JK, Kaholokula JK, Ratner R, Mau M. Ethnic differences in perinatal outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(9):2058–63. [PubMed]
112. Nystrom MJ, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ, Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY. Perinatal outcomes among Asian-white interracial couples. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):385, e1–5. [PubMed]
113. Graham J, Zhang L, Schwalberg R. Association of maternal chronic disease and negative birth outcomes in a non-Hispanic Black-White Mississippi birth cohort. Public Health Nurs. 2007;24(4):311–7. [PubMed]
114. Horton AL, Boggess KA, Moss KL, Jared HL, Beck J, Offenbacher S. Periodontal disease early in pregnancy is associated with maternal systemic inflammation among African American women. J Periodontol. 2008;79(7):1127–32. [PubMed]
115. D'Angelo D, Williams L, Morrow B, et al. Preconception and interconception health status of women who recently gave birth to a live-born infant--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 26 reporting areas, 2004. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007;56(10):1–35. [PubMed]
116. Ehrenthal DB, Jurkovitz C, Hoffman M, Kroelinger C, Weintraub W. A population study of the contribution of medical comorbidity to the risk of prematurity in blacks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(4):409, e1–6. [PubMed]
117. Enriquez R, Griffin MR, Carroll KN, et al. Effect of maternal asthma and asthma control on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(3):625–30. [PubMed]
118. Carroll KN, Griffin MR, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A, Mitchel E, Hartert TV. Racial differences in asthma morbidity during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(1):66–72. [PubMed]
119. Cunningham CK, Balasubramanian R, Delke I, et al. The impact of race/ethnicity on mother-to-child HIV transmission in the United States in Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 316. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36(3):800–7. [PubMed]
120. Davis EM, Zyzanski SJ, Olson CM, Stange KC, Horwitz RI. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in the incidence of obesity related to childbirth. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(2):294–9. [PubMed]
121. Thompson DR, Clark CL, Wood B, Zeni MB. Maternal obesity and risk of infant death based on Florida birth records for 2004. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(4):487–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
122. Chu SY, Kim SY, Bish CL. Prepregnancy Obesity Prevalence in the United States, 2004-2005. Matern Child Health J. 2008 [PubMed]
123. Satpathy HK, Fleming A, Frey D, Barsoom M, Satpathy C, Khandalavala J. Maternal obesity and pregnancy. Postgrad Med. 2008;120(3):E01–9. [PubMed]
124. Ramos GA, Caughey AB. The interrelationship between ethnicity and obesity on obstetric outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1089–93. [PubMed]
125. Salihu HM, Alio AP, Wilson RE, Sharma PP, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Obesity and extreme obesity: new insights into the black-white disparity in neonatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1410–6. [PubMed]
126. Salihu HM, Dunlop AL, Hedayatzadeh M, Alio AP, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Extreme obesity and risk of stillbirth among black and white gravidas. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):552–7. [PubMed]
127. McMillen IC, Rattanatray L, Duffield JA, et al. The early origins of later obesity: pathways and mechanisms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;646:71–81. [PubMed]
128. Armitage JA, Poston L, Taylor PD. Developmental origins of obesity and the metabolic syndrome: the role of maternal obesity. Front Horm Res. 2008;36:73–84. [PubMed]
129. Cai G, Cole SA, Haack K, Butte NF, Comuzzie AG. Bivariate linkage confirms genetic contribution to fetal origins of childhood growth and cardiovascular disease risk in Hispanic children. Hum Genet. 2007;121(6):737–44. [PubMed]
130. Bennett T, Adams M. Safe Motherhood in the United States: Challenges for Surveillance. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 6(4):221–6. [PubMed]
131. Rosenberg D, Handler A, Rankin KM, Zimbeck M, Adams EK. Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform: does pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage make a difference? Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(1):11–7. [PubMed]
132. Daniels P, Noe GF, Mayberry R. Barriers to prenatal care among Black women of low socioeconomic status. Am J Health Behav. 2006;30(2):188–98. [PubMed]
133. Johnson AA, El-Khorazaty MN, Hatcher BJ, et al. Determinants of late prenatal care initiation by African American women in Washington, DC. Matern Child Health J. 2003;7(2):103–14. [PubMed]
134. Cheng D, Schwarz EB, Douglas E, Horon I. Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Contraception. 2009;79(3):194–8. [PubMed]
135. Orr ST, James SA, Reiter JP. Unintended pregnancy and prenatal behaviors among urban, black women in Baltimore, Maryland: the Baltimore preterm birth study. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(7):545–51. [PubMed]
136. Bengiamin MI, Capitman JA, Ruwe MB. Disparities in Initiation and Adherence to Prenatal Care: Impact of Insurance, Race-Ethnicity and Nativity. Matern Child Health J. 2009 [PubMed]
137. Kuo TM, Gavin NI, Adams EK, Ayadi MF. Racial disparities in Medicaid enrollment and prenatal care initiation among pregnant teens in Florida: comparisons between 1995 and 2001. Med Care. 2008;46(10):1079–85. [PubMed]
138. Sparks PJ. Do biological, sociodemographic, and behavioral characteristics explain racial/ethnic disparities in preterm births? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(9):1667–75. [PubMed]
139. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56(6):1–103. [PubMed]
140. Lu MC, Chen B. Racial and ethnic disparities in preterm birth: The role of stressful life events. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;191(3):691–9. [PubMed]
141. Taylor CR, Alexander GR, Hepworth JT. Clustering of U.S. women receiving no prenatal care: differences in pregnancy outcomes and implications for targeting interventions. Matern Child Health J. 2005;9(2):125–33. [PubMed]
142. Rates of cesarean delivery among Puerto Rican women--Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland, 1992-2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(3):68–71. [PubMed]
143. Aron DC, Gordon HS, DiGiuseppe DL, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE. Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance. Med Care. 2000;38(1):35–44. [PubMed]
144. Braveman P, Egerter S, Edmonston F, Verdon M. Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(5):625–30. [PubMed]
145. Chung JH, Garite TJ, Kirk AM, Hollard AL, Wing DA, Lagrew DC. Intrinsic racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery are not explained by differences in caregivers or hospital site of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1323–8. [PubMed]
146. Irwin DE, Savitz DA, Bowes WA, Jr., St Andre KA. Race, age, and cesarean delivery in a military population. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(4 Pt 1):530–3. [PubMed]
147. Goldberg J, Hyslop T, Tolosa JE, Sultana C. Racial differences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(4):1063–7. [PubMed]
148. Combs C, Murphy E, Laros RJ. Factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage with vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(1):69–76. [PubMed]
149. Rouse D, Leindecker S, Landon M, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: uterine atony after primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 193(3 Pt 2):1056–60. [PubMed]
150. Kramer MS, Wilkins R, Goulet L, et al. Investigating socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: evidence for selective study participation and selection bias. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(4):301–9. [PubMed]