|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
Existing techniques for monitoring neural activity in awake, freely behaving vertebrates are invasive and difficult to target to genetically identified neurons. Here we describe the use of bioluminescence to non-invasively monitor the activity of genetically specified neurons in freely behaving zebrafish. Transgenic fish expressing the Ca2+-sensitive photoprotein GFP-apoAequorin (GA) in most neurons generated large and fast bioluminescent signals related to neural activity, neuroluminescence, that could be recorded continuously for many days. To test the limits of this technique, GA was specifically targeted to the hypocretin-positive neurons of the hypothalamus. We found that neuroluminescence generated by this group of ~20 neurons was associated with periods of increased locomotor activity and identified two classes of neural activity corresponding to distinct swim latencies. Thus, our neuroluminescence assay can report, with high temporal resolution and sensitivity, the activity of small subsets of neurons during unrestrained behavior.
To correlate the activation of specific neurons with the execution of specific behaviors, it is necessary to monitor neural activity while an animal behaves. Neural recordings in freely moving animals are possible with electrophysiology, but the available techniques are invasive, often cannot target specific neurons, and are restricted to organisms that can physically transport the required electronics 1–2. Optical techniques, using genetic strategies to target protein reporters to specific neurons and non-invasively monitor their activity, provide a promising alternative 3. These tools have provided access to neurons in the larval zebrafish brain and allow monitoring and manipulating their activity in vivo 4–8. In particular, synthetic and genetically-encoded fluorescent Ca2+-indicators, targeted to distinct neural populations, have been used to relate the activity of defined cell-types to different stimuli or behaviors 9–11. However, fluorescence imaging strategies used to optically detect neural activity are selective for signals arising from a narrow focal plane, and these signals are corrupted when motion causes fluorescently-labeled neurons to enter and exit the imaged region 8,12. This sensitivity to movement has limited imaging techniques to restrained, paralyzed or anesthetized animals for which behavior is abolished or severely restricted 10,13–14.
In principle, a “non-imaging” technique can allow monitoring neural activity in freely behaving zebrafish. Non-imaging systems do not attempt to form an image of the source at the light detector and thus do not require intermediate focusing optics. As a consequence, a large-area photo-detector can be positioned directly above the behavior arena. The detector receives light emitted from anywhere within the arena and the optical signals from the neurons labeled in a translucent organism are unaffected by the animal’s movement throughout the collection volume. Although this approach sacrifices all spatial information, a conventional imaging approach will also suffer from a loss of spatial information when used with freely behaving animals: emitted light is scattered by intact tissue and movement of the labeled neurons out of the focal plane will severely limit the possible spatial resolution. In addition, natural behavior requires an arena size substantially larger than the animal and, unless behavior is slow enough to allow the imaging setup to accurately move along with the animal15, the entire area must be imaged at high resolution to gain useful spatial information, all while maintaining the high frame rates necessary for monitoring activity on physiologically relevant timescales. Given the limited spatial information available to an imaging assay of behaving animals, we decided to pursue a non-imaging approach, which is technically straightforward, inexpensive, provides higher temporal resolution, and is able to detect a large portion of emitted light because the detector can be installed close to the behavior arena. Furthermore, spatial information can be gained indirectly by using a genetically-encoded reporter and targeting its expression only to the neurons of interest 3. A non-imaging detection system with a genetically-encoded neural activity reporter would provide a powerful new tool for selectively recording from genetically-defined neurons during natural behavior.
Unfortunately, two features of the commonly-used fluorescent activity reporters preclude their use in a non-imaging setup. First, most fluorescent Ca2+-indicators have baseline light emission when unbound to Ca2+ and, regardless of this basal fluorescence, auto-fluorescence will provide a significant background signal. With these sources of background emission, any changes in excitation or detection efficiency caused by motion within the collection volume will produce changes in the detected fluorescence unrelated to neural activity. Second, the use of fluorescent indicators in a non-imaging setup requires an intense visible excitation light to homogenously fill the behavior/collection arena. In addition to the technical challenge, this excitation light would also disrupt assays of vision and might confound other behavioral experiments (e.g. studies of sleep).
In contrast to fluorescent reporters, Aequorin, a Ca2+-dependent bioluminescent protein produced by the jellyfish Aequorea Victoria, has no background light emission at basal Ca2+ levels and does not require excitation light. Based on these properties alone, we reasoned that Aequorin might be well suited for non-imaging assays of neural activity in freely moving zebrafish. Furthermore, Aequorin has demonstrated excellent characteristics as a genetically-encoded Ca2+sensor 16. Upon binding calcium, Aequorin (luciferase) catalyzes the completion of the luciferase reaction, the oxidation of its substrate (luciferin) coelenterazine (CLZN), resulting in the production of a blue photon 17. Purified Aequorin has been employed as an optical indicator of intracellular Ca2+ in many cell-types, including neurons 18–19. In jellyfish, Aequorin naturally occurs as a complex with green-fluorescent protein (GFP), and via a process termed chemiluminescence resonance energy transfer (CRET), the energy from CLZN oxidation is transferred to GFP and results in the emission of a green photon 20. The efficiency of Ca2+-dependent photoemission from Aequorin is enhanced when associated with GFP (from 10% to 90%), which inspired the development of a GFP-Aequorin fusion (GA) 16. GA retains the fast kinetics of Aequorin (6–30 ms rise time 21) and its sensitivity to Ca2+-concentrations ranging from 100 nM–10 μM 22, which is on par with the best synthetic Ca2+ sensors. In addition, the associated GFP provides a fluorescent tag that can be imaged with conventional fluorescence methods to localize and quantify GA expression. These improved features of GA have fostered new interest in bioluminescence assays for neural Ca2+ signals and it has been successfully employed to monitor pharmacologically evoked activity in neural populations of restrained flies 23, detect mitochondrial Ca2+ in the muscles of behaving mice 24, and image the bioluminescent signals from individual neurons in disassociated cell cultures and in vitro preparations 16,25. Here we describe the implementation of a novel technique that fundamentally extends these initial studies: a non-imaging setup for long term monitoring of GA bioluminescence that can report the activity of a small number of genetically specified neurons in the larval zebrafish during natural, unrestrained behavior. Although initially limited to behaviors occurring in darkness, we also describe and implement a novel bioluminescence detection strategy that uses stroboscopic illumination to reproduce natural lighting, and thus further extend this technique to the investigation of visually-driven behaviors.
The mechanism of Ca2+-dependent bioluminescence from GFP-Aequorin (GA) and the steps to use GA as a neural activity reporter are schematized in Supplementary Fig. 1. Neuron-specific expression of GFP-apoAequorin (Ga), (Supplementary Fig. 2) was achieved by injecting single-cell embryos with plasmid encoding Ga downstream of the neuro-β-tubulin promoter (Nβt). High resolution 2-photon imaging also revealed the absence of any nonspecific expression in muscle (Supplementary Fig. 3) and variegated expression levels in different brain regions (Supplementary Fig. 4). Following a 24 hour exposure to coelenterazine (CLZN), transgenic Nβt:GA zebrafish (Fig. 1a) were placed into the recording device (Fig. 1b) where they swam freely within a behavior chamber positioned directly beneath a large-area photomultiplier tube (PMT). While the PMT detected single photons emitted within the arena, an infrared CCD camera simultaneously tracked fish movement. Most bouts of spontaneous swimming coincided with the emission of large flashes of green light (Fig. 1c–g, Supplementary Movie 1), which occasionally were also observed without concurrent locomotion (Fig. 1d, arrowhead). The absence of any signal in Ga animals, untreated with CLZN, as well as in wild-type fish (with or without CLZN treatment) demonstrated that neuroluminescence required both the expression of Ga as well as exposure to CLZN (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Previous studies used alcohol as a solvent for CLZN reconstitution solutions 26, but we found that dissolving CLZN in 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (CLZN-CDX) 27 also allowed, and possibly facilitated, in vivo formation of GA (Supplementary Fig. 5b) and avoided the negative effects of exposure to ethanol or methanol. Fish tested in cyclodextrin solution at a tenfold higher concentration then normally required showed no detectable changes in health or behavior (Supplementary Fig. 5d). With periodic replacement of the CLZN-CDX bath starting at 3 days-post-fertilization (dpf), large neuroluminescence signals were detected until at least 11 dpf, the last day tested (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Differences in neuroluminescence signal amplitude between individual larvae (Supplementary Fig. 6a–c) were apparent, possibly due to differential CLZN loading (Supplementary Fig. 6d,e) and animals that showed little or no responses were not tested further. Also, signal amplitude was found to depend on the type of CLZN used for GA constitution. Analogs of native CLZN have been developed that confer different binding affinities for calcium resulting in a range of sensitivities for the indicator 21. We found that coelenterazine-h (CLZN-h) consistently produced better results than the native version and was therefore used in our experiments.
Neuroluminescence signals were large (signal to noise ratio 100), stable for long periods of time (>24 hours) (Fig. 2a), and coincident with spontaneous and evoked swim events (Fig. 1c, Fig. 2). Spontaneous signals detected from individual zebrafish spanned a range of sizes (Fig. 2b,c), exhibiting a smooth amplitude distribution with a high frequency of small events phasing into a long tail of increasingly large and rare events (Fig. 2d). After aligning individual signals to the initial onset inflection we estimate a time-to-peak of 5–10 ms and a slower decay time of ~ 25 ms (Fig. 2c), consistent with expectations for Aequorin and comparable to popular synthetic Ca2+-indicators 21.
To measure neuroluminescence signals produced during stimulus-evoked behaviors, we delivered a mechanical tap below the swim chamber to elicit a startle response. Repeatedly evoked neuroluminescence signals were fast and consistently similar in amplitude (Fig. 2e). In order to isolate the sensory component of this response we then paralyzed the fish via a bolus injection of α-Bungarotoxin and repeated the experiment in the same animals (Fig. 2f). Figure 3g shows the aligned evoked signals from freely swimming fish in blue and from the same but paralyzed fish in red. The reduction in signal size following paralysis is not surprising; restrained fish show a substantial reduction spontaneous activity, possibly reflecting s state of behavioral suppression that effects both spontaneous and evoked behaviors (Supplementary Figure 7). Furthermore, we find very weak Ga expression levels in the trigeminal ganglion, one of the primary somatosensory ganglia known to mediate the tap-evoked escape response (Supplementary Figure 4), which can serve as an additional explanation for the reduction of the isolated sensory response in paralyzed fish.
To further investigate the origins of neuroluminescence, we exposed zebrafish to pentylenetetrazole (PTZ, 10 mM), an inhibitor of GABA-A receptors that induces epileptic-like neuronal discharges in humans, rodents and zebrafish 28. Approximately thirty seconds after bath application of PTZ, zebrafish exhibited sustained periods of uncoordinated swimming accompanied by very large waves of neuroluminescence (Fig. 2h, Supplementary Movie 2). These early episodes (~3–5 min) were followed by periodic bouts of clonus-like convulsions and prolonged waves of neuroluminescence that extended beyond the swimming bouts. (Fig. 2i, Supplementary Movie 3). PTZ evoked neuroluminescence signals of similar size and shape can also be detected in fully paralyzed fish (Fig. 2j, Supplementary Movie 4) and serve as a clear example of bioluminescence evoked in the absence of any motor activity.
Imaging the PTZ induced fluorescence changes of a large brain region in a transgenic fish expressing GCaMP229 under the HUC30 promoter with two-photon microscopy uncovers long slow waves of correlated neural activity (Supplementary Figure 8) that are comparable with the neuroluminescence shown in Figure 3h. These imaging experiments highlight the similarity of the bioluminescence signals to those obtained with conventional techniques.
Together, these results obtained with Nβt:GA indicate that neuroluminescence allows the non-invasive and long-term recording of population activity from freely behaving zebrafish larvae.
The hypocretin/orexin (HCRT) system in the hypothalamus consists of a group of neurons that is distinct, small in number (~ 20) and sits at the ventral limit of the diencephalon. It has been implicated in the control of arousal in mammals and fish 31–33 and its disruption in dogs and mice 34–35 produces symptoms similar to those of human narcolepsy, a disorder characterized by the sudden, spontaneous onset of sleep. Electrical recordings from HCRT neurons in rodents have found that these cells are active during periods of wakefulness and exhibit transient bouts of activity during phasic REM sleep 36–37. In addition, specific optical stimulation of channelrhodopsin-2 expressing HCRT neurons in mice increased the probability of awakening from slow-wave sleep 38. Over-expression of HCRT in zebrafish larvae promotes and consolidates wakefulness, induces hyperarousal and inhibits rest 32. However, it has not been determined whether the activity of HCRT neurons in zebrafish is associated with periods of heightened activity, as has been observed in mammals. To directly measure the activity of HCRT neurons during rest and wakefulness, we expressed Ga under the control of a HCRT promoter (Fig. 3) and monitored neuroluminescence throughout a circadian period. To record from this group of neurons is a significant test of the sensitivity of the neuroluminescence approach, because there are less than 20 HCRT neurons within ~100,000 neurons of the larval zebrafish nervous system. In addition, their location deep below the dorsal surface (>300 μm) results in considerable light scattering. Zebrafish larvae expressing Ga in HCRT neurons were treated with CLZN-h at 3 dpf and neuroluminescence was measured on subsequent days. With exposure to a natural light-dark cycle, zebrafish maintain a circadian periodicity in their rate of spontaneous swimming under constant lighting conditions. In the constant darkness of the neuroluminescence assay, larvae were found to increase their rate of swim bouts each morning, shortly after the time of normal lights-ON in the fish rearing facility (Fig. 2a, ,4a).4a). During these morning-active periods, as well as other periods of increased swimming activity 32, we observed an increase in the frequency of neuroluminescent signals from HCRT neurons (Fig. 4a). This is consistent with recordings from HCRT neurons in mammals 36. Furthermore, when compared to Nβt:GA larvae (Fig. 2a), less neuroluminescence was detected in HCRT:GA fish when they were at rest or during brief arousals during the night (Fig. 4a). This suggests that HCRT neurons are specifically active during periods of consolidated locomotor activity and is in agreement with the hypothesis that HCRT promotes wakefulness and inhibits rest in zebrafish larvae 32, as in mammals 38.
To determine whether any proportion of the signals in HCRT:GA larvae were due to non-specific background effects, we used an imaging approach to localize the origin of the luminescence. Using an intensified-CCD camera in a custom-built bioluminescence/fluorescence microscope (Fig. 5a), we imaged restrained zebrafish and compared the spatial location of neuroluminescence to the location of GA expression as reported by the fluorescence of the tethered GFP (Fig. 5b). Again, bath application of PTZ was used to induce epileptic events. As demonstrated in the whole brain two-photon imaging experiments (SupplementaryFig. 8), PTZ exposure induces strong and unspecific activity in most, if not all neurons across the brain, thus highlighting the usefulness of this treatment for control-experiments that test for the contribution of non-specific background expression to the neuroluminescent signals.
Although the zebrafish were paralyzed, this pharmacological stimulation produced transient increases in the total luminescence, similar to those detected in the non-imaging assay (Fig. 5c). During these transient neuroluminescence signals, ~90% of the emitted photons came from a region containing the HCRT somata (Fig. 5d, e). Photons originating from elsewhere within the fish head or tail were largely explained by the background dark-count rate generated by the detector. In addition, the small increase observed with respect to background might result from neuroluminescence generated in the processes of the HCRT neurons, which extend caudally into the spinal cord (Fig. 3). Similar experiments in restrained, but non-paralyzed, Nβt:GA and HCRT:GA fish confirm the absence of any detectable bioluminescence from muscle or other non-neuronal tissues (Supplementary Fig. 9, 10 and 11). Having confirmed the spatial origin of the neuroluminescence produced by HCRT:GA zebrafish, we next examined the properties of individual signals and their association with zebrafish behavior.
Individual neuroluminescence signals produced by HCRT neurons fell into two distinct amplitude categories (Fig. 4b). The aligned signals from individual zebrafish were easily classified into large or small signals with a manually determined threshold of peak amplitude (Fig. 4c). This bi-modal amplitude distribution differed from the continuous distribution measured for Nβt:GA neuroluminescence events (Fig. 4d). Both large and small signals were associated with swim bouts, but the latency of a behavioral response and the distance swum following either signal amplitude consistently differed (Fig. 4e). Signals classified as small HCRT events were followed by a short latency behavior. In contrast, behaviors following large HCRT events occurred 15–30 ms later. Accurate estimation of the neuroluminescence-to-behavior latency was accomplished by fitting the raw photon signal with a dual-exponential function, determining the peak-time, and measuring the time from the peak until the subsequent behaviors exceeded a velocity threshold (Fig. 4f). The histograms of response latencies for large and small HCRT signals are distinct and the average latencies are significantly different (p < 0.001; Student’s T-test: n = 359 small events, n = 135 large events from 5 fish). Furthermore, small HCRT signals were more likely to be preceded by a behavioral response than large HCRT signals. These preceding behavior events result in latency estimates less than zero. Excluding events of clearly inverted causality, (latencies of less than −50ms, 47 of 359 small events versus only 1 of 135 large events) the average response latencies for both amplitude classes of HCRT signals were significantly longer than the latencies observed for Nβt:GA neuroluminescence signals (Fig. 4g), suggesting that swim bouts associated with HCRT events represent a distinct subset of the spontaneous behaviors produced by larval zebrafish (5 HCRT fish, small events (S): 17.6 +/− = 1.0 ms, n = 312, large events (L): 40.8 +/− 1.6 ms, n = 134; 6 NβT fish: 11.3 +/− 0.4 ms, n = 1667 − S versus PN: p < 0.001, L versus PN: p < 0.001). Further analysis of the behaviors associated with the different amplitude HCRT signals (Supplementary Figure 12) revealed that the peak velocity following the small events significantly exceeds that of large events. This analysis also revealed that large events are preceded by increased swim activity compared to small events in a one second time window preceding the HCRT event.
These results highlight that neuroluminescence signals have sufficient temporal resolution to compare neurophysiological and behavioral responses on a time scale of ~10 ms in addition to the capability of distinguishing between responses that differ in amplitude. Whether the small and large HCRT signals result from activating different subsets of the labeled neurons or whether the different amplitudes originate from distinct activation states of the entire population is unknown. We also cannot completely rule out that the small events originate from some unspecific background expression since the control PTZ experiments described in Figure 6 might lack the necessary sensitivity to pick out these relatively small signals.
To explore the limits of neuroluminescence sensitivity, we investigated whether our technique can detect signals from a single HCRT neuron (Supplementary Fig. 13). For this we expressed transiently Ga in HCRT neurons and screened for fish that showed expression in only a single cell (Supplementary Fig. 13a). After treatment with CLZN-h and exposure to PTZ we observed neuroluminescent signals that were small but still well above the detection limit (Supplementary Fig. 13b), a clear demonstration that neuroluminescence can be detected from single neurons.
Using existing detection methods, bioluminescence experiments have been limited to behaviors that occur naturally in darkness. Imperfections in spectral filters, particularly their inability to adequately reject the high-angle (>30°) light incident on the detector, have necessitated that the photon-counting sensor be protected from all but infrared illumination, to which most sensors are largely insensitive. To overcome this problem, we have designed a novel detection system that uses a cathode-gated channel photon multiplier (CPM) with a temporal gating strategy that allows fast flickering visible illumination during the detection of the bioluminescence signal.
In our design, computer generated gating signals control the cathode-voltage of the CPM, a visible LED, and the IR illumination light source for a behavior monitoring camera. During each 10 ms cycle, the CPM is gated “ON” for 9 ms, and is able to detect individual bioluminescence photons. In the final 1 ms, the CPM is rapidly gated “OFF” and both the visible LED and IR illumination are briefly activated, sending ~1012 visible photons towards the now insensitive detector for 1 ms. In the next cycle, the CPM is again gated “ON” and able to count single bioluminescent photons. With this 100 Hz repetition rate and a 90% detection duty cycle, natural illumination conditions can be simulated while only 1 of 10 emitted bioluminescent photons is discarded (Fig. 6a).
We have tested our time-gated detection/illumination strategy by exposing groups of Nβt:GA zebrafish to short visible light cycles (5 min ON, 5 min OFF). Zebrafish respond to transient decreases in illumination with an increase in swim activity, while an elevation in light levels is followed by a period of suppressed activity (Fig. 6b, c). These transient behavioral responses to changes in light intensity are in line with previously reported observations 32. We were able to record this visually-driven behavior while simultaneously recording neuroluminescence signals, demonstrating that the neuroluminescence assay can be extended to experiments requiring natural lighting conditions.
Our results demonstrate a novel technique for monitoring neural activity in freely behaving animals. We show that Ca2+-dependent bioluminescence can be detected from a small number of genetically specified neurons, even just a single cell, and that this signal can be monitored continuously for days while an animal freely behaves within an illuminated environment. This technique offers great potential for future investigations of the neural control of behavior in zebrafish and other neuroscience model systems.
The future development of modified forms of Aequorin, akin to the significant enhancement of other genetically encoded calcium indicators 39, as well as the use of existing or novel CLZN analogs 21 that confer increased Ca2+ sensitivity to Aequorin will further extend the sensitivity of the neuroluminescence technique. Indeed, recent advances in optimizing emission properties of different bioluminescent probes have facilitated their use at the single cell level 16,22 and manipulated their calcium sensitivity 40. Furthermore, the development of new light detectors with improved quantum efficiency for both non-imaging assays (e.g. with large-area avalanche photodiodes and gallium-arsenide-phosphate PMTs) and photon-counting imaging setups (e.g. with electron multiplying CCDs) 41 offer exciting future possibilities for improving GA signal detection.
However, it is likely that the current version of GA, as is the case for existing fluorescent genetically-encoded Ca2+ indicators, lacks the sensitivity to detect individual action potentials 42. We thus expect that the neuroluminescence responses detected with our system primarily result from bursts of firing rather than from individual action potentials. With existing versions of Aequorin, bioluminescence signals evoked by as little as five action potentials have been detected from individual pyramidal neurons in brain slices 42 and these signals showed relatively linear characteristics at higher stimulus intensities. This indicates that our technique is comparable in its sensitivity to existing genetically encoded calcium indicators 43. However, in order to relate neuroluminescence signals quantitatively to the underlying number of action potentials, it is necessary to conduct careful electrophysiological studies separately in each model system and, ideally, in each neuronal sub-population. Nonetheless, these preliminary results suggest that, while individual action potentials are likely to remain undetected, bursts of a few spikes should result in identifiable bioluminescent signals. An indicator that reliably reports bursts of activity is unquestionably useful, especially if it can be targeted to specified subclasses of neurons that are hypothesized to be involved in a natural behavior. In addition, we are highly encouraged by the quantitative properties of neuroluminescence demonstrated by the results with HCRT:GA zebrafish (Fig. 4b–g). Not only are we able to isolate two distinct event amplitudes in a freely swimming zebrafish, but the two amplitude classes were reliable predictors of distinct behaviors. As this technique is applied to different populations of neurons, we expect not only to gain insights about the timing of activity in such a population in the context of natural behaviors, but also to get a reliable report of the magnitude of these activations - another valuable source of information to assist in decoding how the neurons of the brain control an animal’s behavior.
We anticipate the use of expression targeting strategies, including cell-type specific promoters and binary expression systems such as UAS/Gal4 44 to target GA to a wide variety of brain regions and specific neural populations. For example, available promoters for the serotonergic dorsal raphe nuclei 45 or the dopaminergic system 46 can be used to investigate the role of these neurotransmitters and the associated cell populations in various behavioral contexts. With the continued development of behavioral assays and techniques for stimulating and ablating neurons 10,47–48, neuroluminescence has the potential to provide an essential tool for determining how the brain choreographs the complex behavioral patterns of a simple vertebrate.
In addition to the larval zebrafish, neuroluminescence detection during free behavior could be applied to other popular neuroscience model systems. For example, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has been used successfully in bioluminescent imaging assays to study circadian clock genes 49 and to image neural activity in restrained fruit flies 23. Similarly, using a neuroluminescence strategy in the small and genetically accessible Drosophila larvae or the nematode C. elegans should facilitate the long-term and cell-specific recording of neural activity in any behavioral assay. In mammals, the bulk neuroluminescence from genetically distinct neuron types could be recorded during natural behavior with chronically implanted optical fibers 50.
We believe that the fast, stable properties of GA’s report of neural activity along with non-imaging detection strategies provide a useful, easily implemented tool for monitoring the activity of genetically specified cell types during natural behavior; an attractive alternative to more technically challenging imaging approaches currently being pursued.
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) of the mitfa−/− (nacre) strain were used in all studies; they lack body pigmentation and are therefore significantly more translucent than wild type strains. Zebrafish were maintained on a 14/10 hr light-dark cycle and fertilized eggs were collected and raised at 28°C. Embryos were kept in E3 solution (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 KCl, 0.33mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4). All experiments were approved by Harvard University’s Standing Committee on the Use of Animals in Research and Training.
The coding sequence of GFP Aequorin, GA5v1 (a gift from L. Tricoire), referred to throughout the text as Ga, was subcloned via PCR into a neuro-β-tubulin expression vector (Nβt:GFP) (a gift from Paul Krieg) into an AgeI and NotI site, resulting in tol2:Nβt:Ga:tol2. UAS:Ga was constructed by subcloning the coding sequence after the UAS:E1B sequence in the UAS:Dsred Express-1 expression vector by replacing DsRed by blunt end insertion at the AgeI/Not I site. To express Ga in HCRT neurons, the zebrafish HCRT promoter, containing 1 kb of genomic DNA immediately upstream of the HCRT start codon, was subcloned upstream of Ga to yield tol2:HCRT:Ga:tol2. Plasmid DNA (20ng/μl in 100 mM KCl) was injected into nacre zebrafish embryos at the single cell stage for transient expression. To generate stable transgenic zebrafish, tol2:Nβt:Ga:tol2 or tol2:HCRT:Ga:tol2 was co-injected with tol2 transposase mRNA. Injected embryos were grown in E3 solution and screened for expression at 2–5 dpf, and positive individuals (F0) were grown to adulthood and out-crossed to nacre zebrafish. F1 progeny of this cross were screened for expression at 2–5dpf, and transgenic founders with the best expression levels were identified. Most experiments with Nβt:Ga transgenic zebrafish were performed with progeny (F3) of crosses of stable F2 transgenics (heterozygous) and wild-type nacre zebrafish. Hypocretin experiments were performed by crossing HCRT:Ga F0 founders to wild-type nacre zebrafish.
Zebrafish larva were raised in E3 medium and screened for GFP fluorescence of Ga at 3 dpf. For reconstitution with coelenterazine (CLZN), 5–10 larvae were transferred into 2 ml of E3 solution containing a final concentration of 40 μM CLZN-h (Biotium, USA) or native CLZN (Invitrogen, USA or Biotium, USA) (all stock solutions at 10 mM dissolved in 45% 2-hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrin (Invitrogen, USA) were kept at −80°C to minimize auto-oxidation). After 24–48 hours, larvae were washed repeatedly in E3 medium and maintained in new E3 medium until they were transferred to the recording chamber (0–3 hours). In some experiments fish were transferred back into freshly prepared E3-CLZN solution after a neuroluminescence recording session and washing was repeated before the next set of experiments.
Within a light-proof enclosure, the bioluminescence and behavior setup (Fig. 1b) was assembled and aligned using structural framing (80/20, USA) and optomechanic components (Thorlabs, USA). Zebrafish were placed in ~1 ml of E3 solution contained in a circular behavior chamber machined from clear-acrylic (12.5 mm in diameter and 6.25 mm in depth) enclosed on the top and bottom with cover glass. To avoid bubble formation in long term or overnight recordings, silicone sealant was used to keep the cover glass held in position. The chamber was mounted as close as physically possible (~5 mm) to a large-area photon-counting PMT (H7360-02: Hamamatsu, Japan) with USB interface counting unit (C8855: Hamamatsu, Japan), thus maximizing the angle of light collected by the detector (>60°). An 880 nm infrared LED ring light (Advanced Illumination, USA) was placed above the recording chamber, surrounding the PMT. The low-incident angle of the LEDs allowed the zebrafish to be illuminated while only minimally directing light into the PMT. To further limit bleed through of the IR illumination light into the sensitive detector, a 700nm short-pass filter (Chroma, USA) was placed at the entrance to the PMT. An infrared-sensitive CCD camera (C4900, Hamamatsu, Japan) was positioned beneath the behavior chamber and imaged the zebrafish behavior via a close-focus manual zoom lens (58–240: Edmund Optics, USA). The camera’s sensitivity allowed for low-light IR illumination, but was limited to 30 Hz frame acquisition rates. However, software de-interlacing and cropping of the video signal resulted in 60 Hz frame rates (frame period of 16.67 ms) at 250×240 pixels.
Depending on the experiment, single fish or groups of up to 10 were included in the chamber. In some experiments, PTZ was added to induce epileptic events, while keeping the final volume constant. To evoke escape responses, zebrafish were stimulated with a mechanical tap delivered to the behavior chamber by a custom-designed computer controlled electromagnetic lever. Photon count data from the PMT, behavior image data from the CCD, and experiment/stimulus control was accomplished with a custom multi-threaded C++ program. However, Labview drivers (National Instruments, USA) are available for the USB counter and the camera frame-grabber (PCI-1407, National Instruments, USA). To minimize the amount of behavioral data recorded, images were compressed with a custom compression algorithm that stored only pixels with intensity changes larger than the camera noise threshold and permitted continuous behavior monitoring for days. In some HCRT:GA experiments, IR illumination was strobed for 20 ms at 1 Hz and camera frames were synchronously acquired at 1 Hz, thus minimizing bleed-through into the PMT but allowing the classification of behavior into active and inactive seconds based upon whether the fish had moved since the last frame acquisition. All data analysis was performed with custom Matlab software (Mathworks, USA). Individual bioluminescent events were fitted with a double exponential function:
where τ1is the time constant for the rising phase, τ 2the time constant for the decay and A and O fit the Amplitude and the horizontal offset respectively.
Prior to imaging, larvae were anaesthetized using 0.02% Tricaine (Sigma, USA) in E3 and embedded in low melting point agarose (1.2% w/v). Tricaine was removed and α-Bungarotoxin (1 mg/ml, Sigma, USA) was injected into the ventral region of the spinal cord using a pulled glass pipette, inducing paralysis and preventing movement artifacts. Expression profiles or coelenterazine loadings were imaged at high resolution with a custom built two-photon microscope10 employing a Ti:Sapphire laser (Spectra Physics, USA) tuned to 920 nm for Ga and 850 nm for CLZN. All data acquisition and analysis was performed using custom Labview (National Instruments, USA), Matlab (Mathworks, USA) and C++ software.
Using a modified commercial imaging system (Xenogen, USA), a custom designed microscope was built to allow magnification of the zebrafish brain onto an image intensifier, which amplifies light via an electron multiplication stage that is directed onto a phosphor screen that is imaged by a conventional CCD camera. The microscope incorporated an Blue-UV LED illuminated epifluorescence pathway for imaging GA expression prior to photon counting and a 20X water immersion objective with a 0.95 numerical aperture (Olympus, Japan). A manual z-stage allowed adjustment of the focal plane within the zebrafish brain (Newport, USA). A USB frame-grabber (Sensoray, USA) was used to acquire raw images from the CCD, and custom C++ and Matlab (Mathworks, USA) software was used to detect single photon positions and exclude cosmic rays. After being treated with CLZN-h and washed with E3, zebrafish were prepared as described above for two-photon imaging. After acquiring a fluorescent image by exciting GA positive neurons with UV light and a bright field image to localize the GA positive neurons within the fish, baseline photon emission was recorded. To identify the neuronal source of any emitted photons, PTZ (10 mM) was used to maximally excite all neurons in the fish. Recordings were made continuously for approximately an hour. Analysis of the photon source position was performed by examining periods of transient increases in full field photon emission similar to those detected in the free-behavior assay. All analysis was performed with custom Matlab software.
Within a light-proof enclosure, the bioluminescence and behavior setups were assembled as described above. The following differences were implemented: A channel photon multiplier CPM (MP 1984 CPM, Perkin Elmer Optoelectronics, Germany) with a 520/60 nm band-pass filter (Chroma, USA) was mounted directly above the recording chamber. A yellow LED (peak emission: 587 nm, luminous intensity: 1900 mcd, RadioShack, USA) was directed towards the behavior chamber from the side. A high-speed, infrared-sensitive CCD camera (Pike, Allied Vision Technology, USA) was installed beneath the behavior chamber. An Infrared filter (Hoya filter, R72, B and H Photo, USA) was mounted on the camera lens to prevent bleed through of the visible illumination light into the camera. The camera’s sensitivity allowed for low-light IR illumination with frame rates exceeding 100 Hz.
During bioluminescence measurements, groups of up to 10 NβT GA fish were placed into the chamber. Computer generated timing signals (C++ and Labview, National Instruments, USA) controlled the IR illumination of the infrared LED ring light, the stimulus LED, and the camera exposure times. During one illumination cycle, the CPM was initially gated on for 9 ms and sensitive to individual bioluminescent photons after which it was rapidly gated OFF for 1 ms. While the CPM was off, the IR illumination and visible LED were briefly switched on for 0.8 ms and a camera exposure was acquired. This recording-illumination cycle was repeated at 100 Hz, producing the illusion of constant visible illumination while still allowing 90% of the emitted bioluminescence photons to be detected by the CPM.
We thank W. Hastings and T. Wilson for bountiful advice, discussion, and generously providing an intensified CCD camera. We also thank L. Tricoire for the kind gift of the GA construct; M. Orger, A. Douglass, P. Ramdya, and members of the Engert and Schier labs for comments and advice; A. Douglass for Nβt:gal4 vectors; P. Ramdya for providing the nacre strains; and B. Obama for his stimulation package. We thank Steven Zimmerman, Karen Hurley, and Jessica Miller for excellent zebrafish care. This work was funded by the McKnight Foundation (F.E.), the Harvard Mind, Brain, and Behavior post-doctoral fellows program (A.R.K.), and the NIH (A.F.S., D.P.).
Author contributionsE. A. N. and A. R. K. designed the assay and performed the experiments. E. A. N., A. R. K., and F.E. analyzed the data. D. A. P. and A. F. S. generated the HCRT:Ga transgenic line and assisted with behavioral analysis. E. A. N., A. R. K., D. A. P., A. F. S. and F.E. prepared the manuscript. E. A. N. suffered the most.