Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
TAG. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische Und Angewandte Genetik
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 May; 118(8): 1411–1427.
Published online 2009 March 3. doi:  10.1007/s00122-009-0991-8
PMCID: PMC2845881

Detection and verification of malting quality QTLs using wild barley introgression lines


A malting quality quantitative trait locus (QTL) study was conducted using a set of 39 wild barley introgression lines (hereafter abbreviated with S42ILs). Each S42IL harbors a single marker-defined chromosomal segment from the wild barley accession ‘ISR 42-8’ (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) within the genetic background of the elite spring barley cultivar ‘Scarlett’ (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare). The aim of the study was (1) to verify genetic effects previously identified in the advanced backcross population S42, (2) to detect new QTLs, and (3) to identify S42ILs exhibiting multiple QTL effects. For this, grain samples from field tests in three different environments were subjected to micro malting. Subsequently, a line × phenotype association study was performed with the S42ILs in order to localize putative QTL effects. A QTL was accepted if the trait value of a particular S42IL was significantly (P < 0.05) different from the recurrent parent as a control, either across all tested environments or in a particular environment. For eight malting quality traits, altogether 40 QTLs were localized, among which 35 QTLs (87.5%) were stable across all environments. Six QTLs (15.0%) revealed a trait improving wild barley effect. Out of 36 QTLs detected in a previous advanced backcross QTL study with the parent BC2DH population S42, 18 QTLs (50.0%) could be verified with the S42IL set. For the quality parameters α-amylase activity and Hartong 45°C, all QTLs assessed in population S42 were verified by S42ILs. In addition, eight new QTL effects and 17 QTLs affecting two newly investigated traits were localized. Two QTL clusters harboring simultaneous effects on eight and six traits, respectively, were mapped to chromosomes 1H and 4H. In future, fine-mapping of these QTL regions will be conducted in order to shed further light on the genetic basis of the most interesting QTLs.


The most important end use of spring barley is the production of malt as substrate for brewing beer and distilling whisky. Malting quality is composed of numerous interacting traits with a high complexity concerning their biochemical and genetic basis (Fox et al. 2003). In most instances, the traits are conditioned by interaction of polygenes, so called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). To accelerate the breeding of cultivars with improved malting quality, molecular markers and genetic linkage maps were used to localize these loci. Thus, in recent years, the elite barley gene pool was extensively used for numerous QTL studies on malting quality (e.g. Marquez-Cedillo et al. 2000; See et al. 2002; Barr et al. 2003a, b; Collins et al. 2003; Emebiri et al. 2003, 2004, 2005; Hayes et al. 2003; Edney and Mather 2004; Rae et al. 2007; Panozzo et al. 2007).

The value of exotic barley germplasm as a source for trait improving alleles was proven by studies targeting quantitative traits. Although potentially useful allelic variation regarding important malting quality characteristics was identified in wild barley (Ahokas and Naskali 1990a, b; Zhang et al. 2007), the utilization of unadapted germplasm is, so far, restricted to a limited number of malting quality QTL studies. By means of “advanced backcross” (AB)-QTL studies with germplasm of the wild barley form Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum, hereafter abbreviated with Hsp Pillen et al. (2003, 2004) and Li et al. (2005) detected putative QTLs affecting the parameters friability, protein content, water absorption and malt extract. A further AB-QTL study involving the same Hordeum subspecies as exotic parent was performed by von Korff et al. (2008). Here, 301 BC2DH lines of the population S42 (‘Scarlett’ × ‘ISR 42-8’) were genotyped with 98 SSR markers, and, in addition, subjected to a micro malting experiment. Subsequently, the performance of the lines regarding seven malting quality characteristics (e.g. α-amylase activity, fermentability, grain protein content and viscosity) was evaluated. By means of a mixed model analysis of variance, altogether 48 putative QTLs were assessed. At 18 QTLs (37.5%), the exotic allele caused an improved trait performance.

Once QTLs influencing important traits are localized, this information can be exerted for further studies, for instance to investigate gene by gene and gene by environment interactions, pleiotropic effects and to map-based clone strong QTL effects. It is furthermore advisable to transfer favorable exotic QTL alleles into existing varieties, and, thus, to breed improved cultivars. Zamir (2001) recommended the use of introgression libraries for those applications. Each introgression line (IL) within such a library contains a single marker-defined chromosomal fragment of an exotic species, whereas the remaining part of the genome originates from an elite variety. A complete IL library, developed by several rounds of backcrossing and selfing and in parallel marker-assisted selection (MAS), represents the whole donor genome in overlapping introgressions. The great advantage of such an IL set compared to commonly used QTL mapping populations is the low proportion of exotic germplasm present in each line. Thereby, negative effects of donor alleles, i.e. linkage drag, are reduced and the phenotypic variation between the ILs can be attributed with high accuracy to the particular introduced segment. Due to their homozygosity, ILs are a stable resource which can be exerted for a multitude of purposes. Regarding end use quality, introgression libraries were so far evaluated in tomato (Rousseaux et al. 2005), rice (Zheng et al. 2007), wheat (Liu et al. 2007), melon (Eduardo et al. 2007; Fernandez-Trujillo et al. 2007; Obando et al. 2008), and rye (Falke et al. 2008). In barley, Matus et al. (2003) developed a set of 140 recombinant chromosome substitution lines (RCSLs) which contained in most instances multiple exotic segments of the exotic accession ‘Caesarea 26-24’. By association analysis, the trait performance of the RCSLs was evaluated. Matus et al. (2003) observed significant transgressive segregation, and identified several QTL regions for the malting quality parameters α-amylase activity, diastatic power, grain protein content, malt extract and wort β-glucan content. Furthermore, a set of 59 ILs, each harboring a single wild barley introgression in the uniform genetic background of elite barley, was selected and subsequently used for the verification of QTLs affecting disease resistance and agronomic performance (Schmalenbach et al. 2008, 2009).

The present paper reports on the application of a set of 39 wild barley introgression lines (S24ILs), taken from Schmalenbach et al. (2008), to conduct a malting quality QTL analysis. Each line harbors one single introgression of the exotic barley accession ‘ISR 42-8’ (Hsp) in the genetic background of the elite barley cultivar ‘Scarlett’ (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare, hereafter abbreviated with Hv). For evaluating the malting quality performance of the S42ILs, a micro malting experiment with grain samples from field tests in three different environments was conducted. Subsequently, the resulting data for eight malting quality parameters were analyzed within a line × phenotype association study in order (1) to verify QTL effects previously localized in the population S42 which consists of 301 BC2DH lines (von Korff et al. 2008), (2) to detect new QTLs, and (3) to identify S42ILs exhibiting significant effects on several traits simultaneously.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Altogether 39 selected wild barley introgression lines (named S42IL-101 to S42IL-139) were subjected to a malting quality analysis. The S42ILs were developed based on an initial cross between the German spring barley cultivar ‘Scarlett’ and the Israeli wild barley accession ‘ISR 42-8’. Subsequently, three rounds of backcrossing with the recurrent parent, repeated selfing and, in parallel, marker-assisted selection (MAS) were conducted. Finally, the S42ILs were selected in BC3S2 or BC3S4 generation. Each S42IL harbors a single SSR marker-defined chromosomal segment of the exotic parent, whereas the remaining genome is derived from the elite parent. The construction and genotypic characterization of the lines, as well as their application to verify QTL effects for disease resistances, are described in detail in Schmalenbach et al. (2008).

Field cultivation of the introgression lines

The 39 S42ILs were cultivated at three different locations in Germany during the season 2007 to evaluate agronomic performance (Schmalenbach et al. 2009) and to obtain seed material for micro malting. The locations were the experimental research station Dikopshof (D07, University of Bonn, western Germany), and the breeders’ experimental field stations in Gudow (G07, Nordsaat Saatzucht, northern Germany) and Herzogenaurach (H07, Saatzucht Josef Breun, southeastern Germany). The introgression lines were grown in three replications (blocks) per location. As a control, the elite parent ‘Scarlett’ was tested in four replications per block. Growing conditions such as net plot sizes (4.5–6.0 m2), seed density (300–390 kernels/m2), nitrogen fertilization (30–80 kg N/ha) and field management followed local practice. Further details are given in Schmalenbach et al. (2009).

Malting quality analysis

Micro malting and malting quality analysis were conducted in the laboratory of Nordsaat Saatzucht (Böhnshausen, Germany), using 100 g of grain of the sieving fraction > 2.5 mm. The malting process and the determination of α-amylase activity and raw protein content were performed as described in von Korff et al. (2008). Both traits as well as the quality characters fine-grind extract of malt, friability of malt, and viscosity of wort were measured using the methods recommended by the European Brewery Convention (EBC). The traits Kolbach index and Hartong 45°C were determined according to the methods of the Mitteleuropäische Brautechnische Analysenkommission (MEBAK). The investigated traits are explained in Table 1. The exotic parent ‘ISR 42-8’ was not included in the experiment since, in general, wild barley exhibits no malting quality, and, in addition, sufficient number of seeds for micro malting was not available.

Table 1
List of eight malting quality traits evaluated for 39 S42ILs in three environments

Statistical analyzes

Statistical analyzes were performed with SAS Enterprise Guide 4.1 (SAS Institute 2006). Genetic correlations between trait values were determined with the least squares means (LSMEANS) for each of the 39 S42ILs averaged across all replications and environments. The LSMEANS were computed with the general linear model (GLM) procedure and used for calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with the CORR procedure.

For identification and verification of QTL effects, the phenotype data of the S42ILs was subjected to a line x phenotype association study. First, the following two-factorial mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out with the GLM procedure:

equation M1

where μ is the general mean, Li is the fixed effect of the ith line, Ej is the random effect of the jth environment, L × Eij is the random interaction effect of the ith line and the jth environment, and εk(ij) is the error of Yijk.

When the analysis revealed significant (P < 0.05) differences between lines or line x environment interactions, a Dunnett test was conducted (Dunnett 1955). Here, the LSMEANS of each S42IL and of ‘Scarlett’ as a control were tested for significant differences. When the LSMEANS of a particular S42IL was significantly (P < 0.05) different from ‘Scarlett’ across all three environments and/or in a particular environment, the presence of a QTL was assumed. It was detected either as line main effect or as line × environment interaction effect or as both effects simultaneously. If several lines, which carry overlapping or flanking introgressions, revealed a significant effect of the same direction (increase or reduction of trait value), it was assumed that these lines harbored the same QTL. Introgressions do overlap, if they possess at least one common Hsp allele. They flank each other, if they have adjacent Hsp alleles. The relative performance of a particular S42IL was calculated as follows: RP [S42IL] = (LSMEANS [S42IL] − LSMEANS [‘Scarlett’])*100/LSMEANS [‘Scarlett’], where for each trait the LSMEANS were calculated across all replications and environments.

Data storage

For general use, all genotype and phenotype data of the S42IL set will be archived in the public IL data base ‘Phenom Networks’ (


Trait performances of ‘Scarlett’ and the S42IL set

In Table 2, the parameters mean, minimum, maximum, and coefficient of variation specify the performance of the recurrent parent ‘Scarlett’ and the S42IL set for each trait. The values are indicated per environment and across all three environments. For all traits and environments, except for grain protein content in environment D07, the S42ILs revealed a higher coefficient of variation than ‘Scarlett’. Across all environments, the recurrent parent as well as the S42ILs, exhibited the highest coefficient of variation for the traits α-amylase activity (22.0 and 22.1%, respectively) and grain sieving fraction > 2.5 mm (13.6 and 14.9%, respectively). Low variation in performance was assessed for fine-grind extract, viscosity and grain protein content. For almost all traits and environments ‘Scarlett’ showed a higher average performance than the S42IL set. As listed in Table 2, an exception is grain protein content where the mean is slightly lower for the recurrent parent than the S42ILs in each environment. The same observation was detected for viscosity in environments D07 and G07.

Table 2
Parameters describing the trait performance of the recurrent parent ‘Scarlett’ and the S42ILs per environment and across all tested environments

Genetic correlations

Altogether 27 significant correlations were assessed between the eight investigated parameters (Table 3). Solely α-amylase activity and fine-grind extract showed no significant correlation. Twenty-two genetic correlations were highly significant (P < 0.001). Strong positive correlations were detected between VZ45 and the traits Kolbach index, α-amylase activity and friability (r = 0.92, 0.83 and 0.73, respectively). The latter two traits were also highly positively correlated with Kolbach index (r = 0.86 and 0.82, respectively) and among each other (r = 0.69). Finally, a strong positive correlation of 0.73 was measured between grain sieving fraction > 2.5 mm and viscosity. Grain protein content revealed negative correlations with friability, Kolbach index, Hartong 45°C, fine-grind extract and α-amylase activity (r = −0.69, −0.69, −0.67, −0.52 and −0.44, respectively). In addition, friability and Kolbach index exhibited negative correlations of −0.64 and −0.59, respectively, with viscosity which was also negatively correlated with α-amylase activity (r = −0.55). The trait grain sieving fraction > 2.5 mm correlated negatively to Kolbach index, α-amylase activity, friability and Hartong 45°C (r = −0.60, −0.55, −0.48 and −0.46 respectively), but positively to fine-grind extract and grain protein content (r = 0.46 and 0.22, respectively).

Table 3
Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between eight malting quality traits in 39 S42ILs

Detection of QTL effects

In order to assess QTL effects on malting quality, the 39 S42ILs were subjected to a line x phenotype association study. For all eight investigated traits, the two-factorial mixed model ANOVA revealed significant line effects (P < 0.05). Significant line × environment interactions (P < 0.05) were detected for all traits with the exception of fine-grind extract and viscosity (data not shown).

As presented in Table 4, altogether 68 significant line × phenotype associations were exhibited by the subsequently performed Dunnett test. For 45 associations, both, the line main effect and the line × environment interaction effect were significant, whereas for eleven associations solely the line main effect was significant. The remaining 12 associations were detected solely as line × environment interaction effect. Due to the overlapping or flanking of several introgressions, the associations were summarized to a total of 40 QTLs. At 30 QTLs the line main as well as the line x environment interaction effect was significant. At six out of the 40 QTLs (15.0%), the exotic introgression was associated with an improved trait performance compared to the control ‘Scarlett’. Those favorable Hsp effects were detected for the traits α-amylase activity, grain sieving fraction > 2.5 mm and Kolbach index. In the following, the detected QTL effects are specified for each trait separately (see Table 4).

Table 4
List of 68 significant line × phenotype associations for eight malting quality traits detected with 39 S42ILs

α-amylase activity (AA)

For AA, altogether ten S42ILs on all chromosomes except 2H and 3H exhibited a significant line x phenotype association, among which four lines harbor an exotic segment on chromosome 1H. Taking into account that some lines carry overlapping or flanking Hsp segments, the associations were summarized to seven putative QTLs, among which five QTLs revealed a significant line main and line × environment interaction effect simultaneously. At two QTLs on chromosome 4H, QAa.S42IL-4H.a and QAa.S42IL-4H.b, a favorable Hsp effect was detected. Here, the α-amylase activity of the S42ILs -116 and -124 was enhanced by 20.0 and 16.2%, respectively, relative to the recurrent parent ‘Scarlett’. A maximum reduction of trait performance of −32.5% was measured at QAa.S42IL-5H.a for S42IL-125 containing an exotic introgression in the region 5H, 43–69 cM (Table 4).

Fine-grind extract (FGE)

A total of seven significant line × phenotype associations on chromosomes 1H, 4H, 6H and 7H, summarized to four QTL effects, were detected for FGE. At all QTLs, both, the line main and the line × environment interaction effect were significant, and the Hsp introgression was associated with a decreased FGE compared to ‘Scarlett’. The highest differences between the performance of an IL and the control were exhibited at QFge.S42IL-1H.a for S42IL-102 and -103, containing Hsp introgressions within the region 1H, 0–85 cM and 1H, 39–70 cM, respectively (−3.2 and −2.9%, respectively).

Friability (FRI)

For FRI, six significant line × phenotype associations were detected on chromosomes 1H and 4H. In two cases, represented by S42ILs -118 and -119, the effect was solely significant in environment D07 (Table 4). The six significant associations could be summarized to two QTL effects. The exotic introgression reduced the trait value by a maximum of −20.0% in S42IL-102, carrying a Hsp segment in the chromosomal region 1H, 0–85 cM.

Grain protein content (GPC)

For GPC, six significant line × phenotype associations, summarized to four putative QTLs, were identified on chromosomes 1H, 4H, 6H and 7H. Five associations showed both, a significant line main and a line × environment interaction effect, whereas S42IL-128 exhibited solely a significant line main effect. At QGpc.S42IL-6H.a the Hsp segment of S42IL-129, present in the region 6H, 96–112 cM, caused a maximum increase of GPC of 8.9%, relative to the control. Other strong exotic increasing effects were measured at QGpc.S42IL-4H.a and QGpc.S42IL-7H.a (7.7 and 7.4%, respectively).

Grain sieving fraction > 2.5 mm (GSF)

Seventeen significant line × phenotype associations were identified for GSF on all chromosomes with the exception of 5H and 6H. Due to the overlapping or flanking of several introgressions, a total of ten putative QTLs were identified, among which three QTLs each were mapped to chromosomes 2H and 4H. At seven loci the line main and the line x environment interaction effect were significant. In contrast, two QTLs were solely detected as line main effects, and one QTL (QGsf.S42IL-3H.a) only as interaction effect in environment D07. At QGsf.S42IL-2H.a, QGsf.S42IL-2H.c and QGsf.S42IL-4H.a, the exotic introgression caused a favorable increase of GSF by 8.4, 6.7 and 6.2%, respectively. The strongest unfavorable effect on GSF was exhibited by S42IL-122, carrying an Hsp segment on chromosome 4H, 125–132 cM. Here, the trait performance was reduced by 14.1%.

Kolbach index (KOL)

Altogether eleven S42ILs on all chromosomes except 2H revealed a significant line x phenotype association for KOL. Due to the overlapping or flanking of several introgressions, they were summarized to seven QTL effects, among which four effects were detected as significant line main and line x environment interaction effect, simultaneously. In contrast, at QKol.S42IL-3H.a and QKol.S42IL-7H.a solely the line × environment interaction effect was significant, whereas at QKol.S42IL-4H.a only the line main effect was significant. Here, the exotic introgression, located within the region 4H, 14–31 cM, increased KOL by 5.1%, relative to the control. The strongest reduction effects were mapped to the regions 1H, 0–85 cM and 7H, 50 cM by S42IL-102 and -133, respectively. Here, the trait value was decreased by 11.5 and 10.6%, respectively, relative to ‘Scarlett’.

Viscosity (VIS)

Four significant line × phenotype associations, summarized to two QTL effects, were identified for VIS on chromosomes 1H and 6H. The strongest Hsp effect was mapped to the chromosomal regions 1H, 39–70 cM and 6H, 112–155 cM by the S42ILs-103 and -130, respectively. Both lines revealed a viscosity increased by 5.6%, relative to ‘Scarlett’ (Table 4). At QVis.S42IL-6H.a, this effect was only significant in environment G07.

Hartong 45°C (VZ45)

A total of seven significant line × phenotype associations were detected for VZ45 on chromosomes 1H, 4H, 5H and 6H. These associations were summarized to four QTL effects. At three QTLs, the line main effect as well as the line × environment interaction effect was significant, whereas QVZ45.S42IL-6H.a was solely detected as line main effect. At QVZ45.S42IL-1H.a, the exotic introgression, localized in the region 1H, 39–70 cM, was associated with a trait performance decreased by 10.5%, relative to the recurrent parent. Further strong reduction effects were mapped to the regions 5H, 43–69 cM and 1H, 0–85 cM by S42IL-125 and -102, respectively (−10.1 and −9.8%, respectively).


Detection and verification of QTL effects

The objectives of this study were (1) to verify QTLs affecting malting quality parameters which were previously detected within the parent population S42 (von Korff et al. 2008), (2) to identify new QTLs, and (3) to assess S42ILs revealing multiple QTL effects.

By association analysis, altogether 68 significant line × phenotype associations, summarized to 40 putative QTLs, were identified using the S42IL set. Since only at six out of 40 QTLs (15.0%) the exotic introgression was associated with an improved trait performance, a strong selection on favorable malting quality alleles during the breeding process can be assumed. This observation is in contrast to a previous QTL study where the agronomic performance of the S42IL set was evaluated. In the latter case, a high portion of the detected QTLs (40.4%) for yield related traits revealed a favorable Hsp effect (Schmalenbach et al. 2009). This discrepancy possibly indicates that the selective breeding for malting quality might have been stronger than for agronomic performance. Alternatively, the genetic diversity in exotic barley might be higher for agronomic parameters than for malting quality.

The six traits AA, FGE, FRI, GPC, VIS and VZ45 were investigated within the S42ILs as well as in the parent population S42. In addition, the S42ILs were evaluated with regard to GSF and KOL. In population S42, von Korff et al. (2008) identified a total of 45 putative QTLs for the six corresponding traits, among which one-third showed a favorable effect of the exotic allele. Thirty-six out of the 45 QTLs (80.0%) are located in chromosomal regions which are represented by Hsp segments in S42ILs. Hence, these 36 QTL effects are comparable with QTLs detected in the S42IL set. To enable the verification of the remaining QTLs of population S42, introgression lines carrying the donor allele in these regions are currently under construction and will in future be subjected to malting quality analysis. As listed in Table 4, half of the 36 QTLs of the parent population S42 were confirmed by the evaluated S42ILs. For the traits AA and VZ45 all QTLs except one were verified, whereas for VIS and FRI two out of seven QTLs (28.6%) were confirmed. At 15 out of the 18 verified QTLs (83.3%), an Hsp effect of the same direction, i.e. either an increase or a reduction of the trait value caused by the exotic genotype, was measured in both populations. For 12 out of these 15 consistent QTLs (80.0%), at least one S42IL revealed a higher relative trait performance in comparison to the control ‘Scarlett’ than assessed for the corresponding QTL in population S42 (see also von Korff et al. 2008).

For traits AA, FGE, GPC and VZ45, altogether eight new QTL effects, previously not assessed in population S42, were identified in the S42IL set. All these QTLs exhibited an unfavorable Hsp effect. In addition, a total of 17 QTLs affecting the newly investigated traits GSF or KOL were mapped by S42ILs. At four QTLs (23.5%), the exotic introgression was associated with a favorable increase of the trait value compared to ‘Scarlett’.

Inconsistent results of the two compared studies might be explained by different hypotheses. It could be that interactions between non-linked Hsp alleles, present in the S42 population, are no more existent in the S42ILs. Since the S42ILs carry single exotic segments, whereas the BC2DH lines of population S42 contain several independent introgressions, potential epistatic effects are expected to be reduced in the S42ILs. Furthermore, contradictory results of the two compared studies might be attributed to genotype x environment interactions.

In the following, the QTL results of the present study are discussed in detail. They are compared to significant effects, detected in population S42 (von Korff et al. 2008) and in other malting quality QTL studies, and are related to possible candidate genes which are located in the same chromosomal region.

α-amylase activity

In population S42 von Korff et al. (2008) detected six putative QTLs which map to chromosomal regions represented by exotic introgressions of S42ILs. All these QTLs, with the exception of QAa.S42-4H.b, were confirmed by S42ILs, and at four out of the five verified QTLs an effect with the same direction was assessed in both populations. In contrast, at QAa.S42IL-6H.a/QAa.S42-6H.a the Hsp genotype caused a decrease of AA in S42IL-130, but a favorable increase in population S42 (−14.9 and 16.0% relative to ‘Scarlett’, respectively). Two favorable exotic QTL effects, stable across all tested environments in both populations, were localized on chromosome 4H (Table 4). Here, α-amylase activity was enhanced by a maximum of 20.0% at QAa.S42IL-4H.a in S42IL-116, and by 16.3% at QAa.S42-4H.c in population S42. The region 4H, 170–190 cM, harboring QAa.S42IL-4H.b and QAa.S42-4H.c, corresponds to the locus of Bmy1, coding for β-amylase (Clark et al. 2003). Different hypotheses, possibly explaining the association between QTLs for α-amylase activity and Bmy1 are discussed by von Korff et al. (2008). For instance, it could be assumed that this gene might have a pleiotropic effect. In both studies compared, the strongest unfavorable Hsp effect, stable across all environments, was mapped to the region 5H, 43–69 cM (QAa.S42IL-5H.a and QAa.S42-5H.b, respectively). Here, the exotic genotype was associated with an enzyme activity reduced by −32.5% in S42IL-125 and −21.5% in population S42. Several stress related genes like Dhn1/Dhn2 (Choi et al. 2000) and HvCbf3 (Choi et al. 2002) also map to this region on chromosome 5H. They might be associated with a high thermostability of α-amylase, and, thus, with a preserved enzyme activity during the mashing process. As shown in Table 4, a further decreasing Hsp effect on AA was identified in both populations in the chromosomal region 6H, 112–135 cM, which coincides with Amy1 encoding for one of the two known forms of α-amylase (Rostoks et al. 2005).

As shown in Table 3, a strong positive genetic correlation of 0.86 was assessed between AA and KOL. This coincides with the co-localization of five QTLs on all chromosomes except 2H and 3H, all revealing an Hsp effect of the same direction on both traits. Furthermore, two QTLs on chromosome 1H and 5H were associated with a reducing Hsp effect on AA as well as on VZ45. These consistent effects correspond to a positive correlation of 0.83 between both traits.

Fine-grind extract and Hartong 45°C

For FGE, altogether four QTL effects were localized in population S42 on chromosomes 1H, 3H and 7H. All QTLs are located within genomic regions which are covered by exotic introgressions of S42ILs. The two QTLs QFge.S42-1H.a and QFge.S42-1H.b were confirmed by QFge.S42IL-1H.a, which showed significant line × phenotype associations for S42ILs-102, -103 and -105 (Table 4). In this QTL region, a maximum reduction of trait performance caused by the Hsp genotype was assessed in population S42 as well as in the S42ILs (−2.2 and −3.2%, respectively). Furthermore, the QTLs were stable across all environments in both populations. In the same region, Thomas (2003) revealed a QTL “hot-spot” harboring QTLs for the malting parameter hot water extract from five different barley crosses.

In addition to the confirmed QTLs, altogether three new significant effects on FGE were identified on chromosomes 4H, 6H and 7H by S42ILs. The location of QFge.S42IL-6H.a coincides with the Amy1 locus (Rostoks et al. 2005) as well as with a second QTL cluster for hot water extract which was mapped on the ‘Steptoe’ × ‘Morex’ map (Thomas 2003). The locus of Amy2, coding for the second form of α-amylase, corresponds to the newly identified QTL QFge.S42IL-7H.a (Rostoks et al. 2005).

In population S42, three putative QTLs affecting VZ45 were mapped to chromosomal regions which are already represented by S42ILs. Two QTL effects (66.7%) were confirmed within the present study. In both populations, the exotic genotype caused a maximum decrease of VZ45 on the top of chromosome 1H (−9.1% at QVZ45.S42-1H.a and −10.5% at QVZ45.S42IL-1H.a). Within the S42IL set, two new QTLs were localized in the regions 4H, 80–95 cM and 6H, 40–112 cM. Both effects were stable across all three tested environments and exhibited an unfavorable Hsp effect.

In the present study, a low positive correlation between FGE and VZ45 was measured (r = 0.25). In contrast, the traits exhibited a strong positive correlation (r = 0.58) in population S42 (von Korff et al. 2008) which was expected since both parameters characterize the activity of cytolytic and proteolytic malt enzymes, and, thus, are closely linked. As shown in Table 3, VZ45 indeed revealed high positive correlations with KOL, AA and FRI in the S42IL study (r = 0.92, 0.83 and 0.73, respectively). This coincides with multiple QTL effects on these traits, which are predominantly located on chromosomes 1H and 5H (Fig. 1). One QTL cluster, localized in the region 1H, 0–85 cM, corresponds to the map location of several Hor genes coding for different forms of hordein, the major storage protein in barley (Rostoks et al. 2005).

Fig. 1
SSR map with 68 significant (P < 0.05) line × trait associations for 39 S42ILs and eight malting quality traits. The chromosomes are shown as black bars with cM values for SSR loci following the order of ...

Friability and viscosity

Von Korff et al. (2008) assessed seven QTLs for FRI which are located in chromosomal regions represented by S42ILs. As listed in Table 4, two out of these seven QTLs (28.6%) were confirmed in the present study and revealed a reducing Hsp effect on trait performance in both populations. At QFri.S42-1H.a/QFri.S42IL-1H.a, the exotic genotype decreased FRI by a maximum of 19.4 and 20.0% in population S42 and S42IL-102, respectively. In both verified QTL regions on chromosomes 1H and 4H, Li et al. (2005) identified a QTL effect on friability. Here, the allele of the Hsp accession ‘HS213’ was associated with an increased trait value.

In population S42, seven QTLs affecting VIS were mapped to chromosomal regions, which are already represented by the S42IL set. Two out of these seven QTLs (28.6%) were confirmed by S42ILs. QVis.S42-1H.a and QVis.S42IL-1H.a are located within the chromosomal region 1H, 0–85 cM, which exhibited multiple QTL effects on several traits simultaneously. As described above, one QTL for FRI, associated with a reducing Hsp effect, also maps to this region. This coincides with the strong negative correlation between FRI and VIS (r = −0.64, Table 3). Both traits, FRI and VIS, are cytolytic parameters which are mainly affected by the breakdown of β-glucan, the major constituent of barley endosperm cell walls. Indeed, Han et al. (1995) and Zwickert-Menteur et al. (1996) mapped several QTLs for β-glucan content and β-glucanase activity in the ‘Steptoe’/‘Morex’ population to the described region on chromosome 1H. These findings correspond to the locus of Glb1 encoding for (1→3, 1→4)-β-glucan 4-glucanhydrolase (MacLeod et al. 1991). The second verified QTL for VIS was mapped to the genomic region 6H, 112–155 cM, and revealed an Hsp effect with an opposed direction in the two compared populations. This could be due to the fact, that in the present study this effect was significant solely in environment G07.

Grain protein content and Kolbach index

Grain protein content is one of the major determinants of malting quality. For GPC, von Korff et al. (2008) identified nine QTLs which were located within chromosomal regions already covered by S42ILs. Indeed, five out of these nine QTLs (55.6%) were confirmed by the present study, all exhibiting an increasing Hsp effect. As mentioned above, the region 1H, 0–85 cM, harboring QPro.S42-1H.b and QGpc.S42IL-1H.a, corresponds to the map position of several Hor genes (Rostoks et al. 2005). A different organization of these genes could possibly explain the variation in GPC between the exotic and the elite genotype. Pelger et al. (1993) detected differences regarding the number of segregating Hor loci both between two different wild barley species and between them and several forms of H. vulgare.

In the S42ILs as well as in population S42, QTL effects on GPC were localized on chromosome arm 6HS. These findings coincide with the localization of QTLs for GPC, nitrogen storage, and nitrogen remobilization detected in a RIL population which was derived from a cross between high- and low-GPC barley cultivars (See et al. 2002; Mickelson et al. 2003). As See et al. (2002) reported, a major QTL for GPC was localized near SSR marker HVM74. In our present study, this marker maps to the chromosomal region showing the strongest QTL effect on this trait (QGpc.S42IL-6H.a). Based on different studies conducted in wheat and barley, Distelfeld et al. (2008) assumed that sequence polymorphism in the barley NAC transcription factor HvNAM-1 could be a possible explanation for this QTL. The wheat ortholog of HvNAM-1 was cloned by Uauy et al. (2006) and proved to be responsible for the regulation of grain protein content in wheat. The exotic HvNAM-1 gene, which was mapped onto the S42ILs -128 and -129 (data not shown) is thus a strong candidate to explain the observed effect on GPC in our study. Further transformation experiments will be conducted to test for this hypothesis.

In addition to the verified QTLs, one new QTL for GPC, revealing an unfavorable exotic effect, was mapped to chromosome 7H (QGpc.S42IL-7H.a). In this region, a further QTL for protein content, also exhibiting an unfavorable Hsp effect, was assessed by Li et al. (2005).

For the newly investigated parameter KOL, seven QTL effects, among which one was associated with a favorable increasing effect of the exotic introgression, were mapped to all chromosomes except 2H. The four QTLs QKol.S42IL-1H.a, QKol.S42IL-3H.a, QKol.S42IL-4H.a and QKol.S42IL-5H.a were localized within the same genomic regions as QTLs for KOL identified in the populations ‘Dicktoo’/‘Morex’ and ‘Harrington’/‘Morex’ (Oziel et al. 1996; Marquez-Cedillo et al. 2000). The parameter Kolbach index is conform to the soluble protein/total protein ratio and provides an indication of the proteolytic enzyme content of malt. In fact, QKol.S42IL-3H.a maps to the same chromosome arm as CepB, a gene encoding for malt endopeptidase 1 which hydrolyses hordein (Guerin et al. 1992, 1994).

Grain sieving fraction > 2.5 mm

For the newly investigated trait GSF, altogether ten putative QTLs were identified by S42ILs, where three QTLs exhibited a favorable exotic effect. For nearly all these regions coincident QTLs can be found in the literature. In region 1H, 0–85 cM containing QGsf.S42IL-1H.a, several QTLs for grain size were identified in the populations ‘Blenheim’/‘E224/3’ and ‘Harrington’/‘Morex’ (Thomas et al. 1995; Powell et al. 1997; Marquez-Cedillo et al. 2000). Since grain size is strongly influenced by the accumulation of storage material, like carbohydrates and proteins, during the grain-filling phase of the post-anthesis period (Coventry et al. 2003), different Hor loci, located within the same region, could be assumed to affect GSF. Furthermore, grain size is indirectly influenced by the pre-anthesis period which length is affected by responses to photoperiod and temperature. Thus, as Coventry et al. (2003) underlined, different response genes might be involved in the determination of grain size. Indeed, the major photoperiod response gene of barley, Ppd-H1 (Turner et al. 2005), maps to the same genomic region as QGsf.S42IL-2H.a and QGsf.S42IL-2H.b (Table 4). Moreover, the location of Vrn-H2, one of the barley vernalization response genes (Laurie et al. 1995), corresponds to QGsf.S42IL-4H.c. On chromosome 4H, two further QTL effects (QGsf.S42IL-4H.a and QGsf.S42IL-4H.b) were identified in the present study, and are consistent with QTLs for kernel plumpness assessed in the populations ‘Harrington’/‘Morex’ and ‘Harrington’/‘TR306’ (Marquez-Cedillo et al. 2000; Mather et al. 1997). The barley photoperiod response gene HvCO1 (Griffiths et al. 2003) and the ‘earliness per se’ gene eps7L (Laurie et al. 1995) could be assumed to have an effect on GSF at QGsf.S42IL-7H.a and/or QGsf.S42IL-7H.b. Laurie et al. (1995) demonstrated a delay in flowering time in barley caused by the dwarfing gene sdw1 (previously named denso), which maps to the long arm of chromosome 3H and, thus, could be a candidate gene for GSF at QGsf.S42IL-3H.a. Here, a QTL effect on GSF was also detected by Thomas et al. (1995) and Powell et al. (1997).

Identification of malting quality QTL clusters

As illustrated in Fig. 1, several chromosomal regions exhibited multiple QTL effects. Two QTL clusters mapping to region 1H, 0–85 cM and 4H, 80–95 cM are evidently of particular interest as they harbor QTL effects for eight and six malting quality parameters simultaneously. In previous studies using the S42IL set, additional significant effects on the traits grains per ear, days until heading, plant height, lodging at harvest, and resistance to powdery mildew were also identified in both regions (Schmalenbach et al. 2008, 2009). In the present study, QTLs affecting seven or eight malting quality traits in region 1H, 0–85 cM were assessed in S42ILs-102, -103 and -105 (Fig. 1). In contrast, S42ILs-101 and -104 whose introgressions (1H, 0–14 cM and 1H, 52–70 cM, respectively) are completely represented by S42IL-102 revealed one and no significant effect, respectively. Due to these facts, it could be assumed that the exotic segment present in S42IL-103 is further extended towards the centromere than expected on the basis of SSR genotype data, whereas the introgression of S42IL-104 has the expected size. Thus, introgressions of S42ILs-102, -103 and -105 would cover the same genomic region harboring the QTL cluster. However, it is required to verify this hypothesis by genotyping the S42ILs with additional markers, and thus to define the extension of exotic introgressions more precisely.

One hypothesis explaining the occurrence of QTL clusters might be the presence of relatively few genes with pleiotropic effects. Several studies investigating the ‘domestication syndrome’ in different crop species have supported this assumption by identifying major QTLs as well as major genes directly associated with the domestication process (Bomblies and Doebley 2006; Koinange et al. 1996; Weeden 2007). In contrast, it could be proposed that numerous genes affecting different traits are closely linked within QTL complexes and were fixed during the domestication and breeding process (Xiong et al. 1999). It is advisable to dissect the malting quality QTL clusters identified in the present study and thus to unravel their genetic basis. So far, two malting quality QTL complexes located near the chromosome 4H telomere and in the chromosome 7H centromere region were fine-mapped using two sets of barley isolines (Gao et al. 2004; Han et al. 1997, 2004). By means of these lines, which carried either ‘Steptoe’ or ‘Morex’ segments of different size in the target region, the QTL complexes on chromosome 4H and 7H were resolved to intervals of 0.7–27.9 cM and 2.0–6.4 cM, respectively. A similar study could be conducted using the described S42ILs on chromosomes 1H and 4H as initial material for the development of so called SUB-ILs which possess smaller exotic introgressions.

Future prospects

Exemplified by malting quality, the present study indicates the usefulness of wild barley introgression lines for the localization and verification of QTLs. In future, additional S42ILs harboring exotic introgressions in so far missing genomic regions will be constructed. They could enable the detection of further QTL effects for malting quality as well as for agronomic parameters and disease resistances. In addition, the complete S42IL set will be extensively evaluated with regard to abiotic stress tolerance, i.e. tolerance to drought stress and nutrient deficiency. Through genotyping with Illumina SNPs (Rostoks et al. 2006) or Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) markers (Wenzl et al. 2006), a more precise characterization of the lines on the genome level is also intended. This will facilitate the selection of SUB-ILs with smaller Hsp introgressions, which could be a valuable resource for fine-mapping of QTL clusters and map-based cloning of promising QTL effects. As described above, clustered QTL effects for malting quality which were detected in S42ILs-102, -103, -105, and -121 on chromosomes 1H and 4H, respectively, would be of special interest for such high-resolution mapping approaches. Other studies will focus on the investigation of epistatic effects by constructing S42ILs carrying two or several exotic introgressions simultaneously. The first step towards such a set of lines has already been done by crossing selected S42ILs. These lines could also be used for QTL pyramiding.


We are grateful to Dr. L. Kuntze (Nordsaat Saatzucht) and her team for conducting micro malting experiment and analyzing malting quality parameters. Furthermore, we thank Drs. E. Laubach (Nordsaat Saatzucht), J. Breun and H. Kempe (Saatzucht Josef Breun), and W. Bungert and H. Rehkopf (Dikopshof, University of Bonn) and their teams for performing field experiments. We thank A. Bus for mapping the HvNAM-1 gene to S42ILs -128 and -129. The excellent technical assistance of M. Noschinski is appreciated. This work was funded by the German Plant Genome Research Initiative (GABI) of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, project 0313125B).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  • Ahokas H, Naskali L. Geographic variation of α-amylase, β-amylase, β-glucanase, pullulanase and chitinase activity in germinating Hordeum spontaneum from Israel and Jordan. Genetica. 1990;82:73–78. doi: 10.1007/BF00124634. [Cross Ref]
  • Ahokas H, Naskali L. Variation of α-amylase, β-amylase, β-glucanase, pullulanase, proteinase and chitinase activity in germinated samples of the wild progenitor of barley. J Inst Brew. 1990;96:27–31.
  • Barr AR, Jefferies SP, Broughton S, Chalmers KJ, Kretschmer JM, Boyd WJR, Collins HM, Roumeliotis S, Logue SJ, Coventry SJ, Moody DB, Read BJ, Poulsen D, Lance RCM, Platz GJ, Park RF, Panozzo JF, Karakousis A, Lim P, Verbyla AP, Eckermann PJ. Mapping and QTL analysis of the barley population Alexis × Sloop. Aust J Agr Res. 2003;54:1117–1123. doi: 10.1071/AR02190. [Cross Ref]
  • Barr AR, Karakousis A, Lance RCM, Logue SJ, Manning S, Chalmers KJ, Kretschmer JM, Boyd WJR, Collins HM, Roumeliotis S, Coventry SJ, Moody DB, Read BJ, Poulsen D, Li CD, Platz GJ, Inkerman PA, Panozzo JF, Cullis BR, Smith AB, Lim P, Langridge P. Mapping and QTL analysis of the barley population Chebec × Harrington. Aust J Agr Res. 2003;54:1125–1130. doi: 10.1071/AR02215. [Cross Ref]
  • Bomblies K, Doebley JF. Pleiotropic effects of the duplicate maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY genes zfl1 and zfl2 on the traits under selection during maize domestication. Genetics. 2006;172:519–531. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.048595. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Choi DW, Koag MC, Close TJ. Map locations of barley Dhn genes determined by gene-specific PCR. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101:350–354. doi: 10.1007/s001220051490. [Cross Ref]
  • Choi DW, Rodriguez EM, Close TJ. Barley Cbf3 gene identification, expression pattern, and map location. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:1781–1787. doi: 10.1104/pp.003046. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Clark SE, Hayes PM, Henson CA. Effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms in beta-amylase 1 alleles from barley on functional properties of the enzymes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2003;41:798–804. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00118-9. [Cross Ref]
  • Collins HM, Panozzo JF, Logue SJ, Jefferies SP, Barr AR. Mapping and validation of chromosome regions associated with high malt extract in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Aust J Agr Res. 2003;54:1223–1240. doi: 10.1071/AR02201. [Cross Ref]
  • Costa JM, Corey A, Hayes PM, Jobet C, Kleinhofs A, Kopisch-Obusch A, Kramer SF, Kudrna D, Li M, Riera-Lizarazu O, Sato K, Szucs P, Toojinda T, Vales MI, Wolfe RI. Molecular mapping of the Oregon Wolfe barleys: a phenotypically polymorphic doubled-haploid population. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;103:415–424. doi: 10.1007/s001220100622. [Cross Ref]
  • Coventry SJ, Barr AR, Eglinton JK, McDonald GK. The determinants and genome locations influencing grain weight and size in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Aust J Agr Res. 2003;54:1103–1115. doi: 10.1071/AR02194. [Cross Ref]
  • Distelfeld A, Korol A, Dubcovsky J, Uauy C, Blake T, Fahima T. Colinearity between the barley grain protein content (GPC) QTL on chromosome arm 6HS and the wheat Gpc-B1 region. Mol Breed. 2008;22:25–38. doi: 10.1007/s11032-007-9153-3. [Cross Ref]
  • Dunnett CW. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1096–1121. doi: 10.2307/2281208. [Cross Ref]
  • Edney MJ, Mather DE. Quantitative trait loci affecting germination traits and malt friability in a two-rowed by six rowed barley cross. J Cereal Sci. 2004;39:283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2003.10.008. [Cross Ref]
  • Eduardo I, Arus P, Monforte AJ, Obando J, Fernandez-Trujillo JP, Martinez JA, Alarcon AL, Alvarez JM, Knaap E. Estimating the genetic architecture of fruit quality traits in melon using a genomic library of near isogenic lines. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2007;132:80–89.
  • Emebiri LC, Moody DB, Panozzo JF, Chalmers KJ, Kretschmer JM, Ablett GA. Identification of QTLs associated with variations in grain protein concentration in two-row barley. Aust J Agr Res. 2003;54:1211–1221. doi: 10.1071/AR03006. [Cross Ref]
  • Emebiri LC, Moody DB, Panozzo JF, Read BJ. Mapping of QTL for malting quality attributes in barley based on a cross of parents with low grain protein concentration. Field Crops Res. 2004;87:195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.002. [Cross Ref]
  • Emebiri LC, Mood DB, Horsley R, Panozzo J, Read BJ. The genetic control of grain protein content variation in a doubled haploid population derived from a cross between Australian and North American two-rowed barley lines. J Cereal Sci. 2005;41:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2004.08.012. [Cross Ref]
  • EBC, European Brewery Convention (2005) Analytica-EBC. Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nürnberg, Germany, ISBN: 3-418-00759-7
  • Falke KC, Sušić Z, Hackauf B, Korzun V, Schondelmaier J, Wilde P, Wehling P, Wortmann H, Mank R, Rouppe Voort J, Maurer HP, Miedaner T, Geiger HH. Establishment of introgression libraries in hybrid rye (Secale cereale L.) from an Iranian primitive accession as a new tool for rye breeding and genomics. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;117:641–652. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0808-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fernandez-Trujillo JP, Obando J, Martinez JA, Alarcon AL, Eduardo I, Arus P, Monforte AJ. Mapping fruit susceptibility to postharvest physiological disorders and decay using a collection of near-isogenic lines of melon. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2007;132:739–748.
  • Fox GP, Panozzo JF, Li CD, Lance RCM, Inkerman PA, Henry RJ. Molecular basis of barley quality. Aust J Agr Res. 2003;54:1081–1101. doi: 10.1071/AR02237. [Cross Ref]
  • Gao W, Clancy JA, Han F, Jones BL, Budde A, Wesenberg DM, Kleinhofs A, Ullrich SE, North American Barley Genome Project Fine mapping of a malting-quality QTL complex near the chromosome 4H S telomere in barley. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:750–760. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1688-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Griffiths S, Dunford RP, Coupland G, Laurie DA. The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:1855–1867. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.016188. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Guerin JR, Lance RCM, Wallace W. Chromosomal location of a barley malt endopeptidase gene. Genet Res. 1992;59:179–181.
  • Guerin JR, Lance RCM, Brown AHD, Abbott DC. Mapping of malt endopeptidase, NADH diaphorase and esterase loci on barley chromosome 3L. Plant Breed. 1994;112:279–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb00685.x. [Cross Ref]
  • Han F, Ullrich SE, Chirat S, Menteur S, Jesting L, Sarrafi O, Hayes MP, Jones BL, Blake TK, Wesenberg D, Kleinhofs A, Kilian A. Mapping of β-glucan content and β-glucanase activity loci in barley grain and malt. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;91:921–927. doi: 10.1007/BF00223901. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Han F, Ullrich SE, Kleinhofs A, Jones BL, Hayes PM, Wesenberg DM. Fine structure mapping of the barley chromosome-1 centromere region containing malting-quality QTLs. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;95:903–910. doi: 10.1007/s001220050641. [Cross Ref]
  • Han F, Clancy JA, Jones BL, Wesenberg DM, Kleinhofs A, Ullrich SE. Dissection of a malting quality QTL region on chromosome 1 (7H) of barley. Mol Breed. 2004;14:339–347. doi: 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000049215.53864.e3. [Cross Ref]
  • Hayes PM, Castro A, Marquez-Cedillo L, Corey A, Henson C, Jones BL, Kling J, Mather D, Matus I, Rossi C, Sato K. Genetic diversity for quantitatively inherited agronomic and malting quality traits. In: Bothmer R, Hintum T, Knupffer H, Sato K, editors. Diversity in barley (Hordeum vulgare) New York: Elsevier; 2003. pp. 147–169.
  • SAS Institute (2006) The SAS Enterprise Guide for Windows, release 4.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA
  • Kleinhofs A, Graner A. An integrated map of the barley genome. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2001. pp. 187–199.
  • Koinange EMK, Singh SP, Gepts P. Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean. Crop Sci. 1996;36:1037–1045.
  • Laurie DA, Pratchett N, Bezant JH, Snape JW. RFLP mapping of 5 major genes and 8 quantitative trait loci controlling flowering time in a winter × spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross. Genome. 1995;38:575–585. [PubMed]
  • Li J, Huang XQ, Heinrichs F, Ganal MW, Röder MS. Analysis of QTLs for yield, yield components, and malting quality in a BC3DH population of spring barley. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;110:356–363. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1847-x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liu SW, Zhao SY, Chen F, Xia GM. Generation of novel high quality HMW-GS genes in two introgression lines of Triticum aestivum/Agropyron elongatum. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • MacLeod LC, Lance RCM, Brown AHD. Chromosomal mapping of the Glb1 locus encoding (1→3, 1→4)-β-D-glucan 4-glucanhydrolase EI in barley. J Cereal Sci. 1991;13:291–298. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(09)80007-6. [Cross Ref]
  • Marquez-Cedillo LA, Hayes PM, Jones BL, Kleinhofs A, Legge WG, Rossnagel BG, Sato K, Ullrich E, Wesenberg DM, The North American Barley Genome Project QTL analysis of malting quality in barley based on the doubled-haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm groups. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101:173–184. doi: 10.1007/s001220051466. [Cross Ref]
  • Mather DE, Tinker NA, LaBerge DE, Edney M, Jones BL, Rossnagel BG, Legge WG, Briggs KG, Irvine RB, Falk DE, Kasha KJ. Regions of the genome that affect grain and malt quality in a North American two-row barley cross. Crop Sci. 1997;37:544–554.
  • Matus I, Corey A, Filichkin T, Hayes PM, Vales MI, Kling J, Riera-Lizarazu O, Sato K, Powell W, Waugh R. Development and characterization of recombinant chromosome substitution lines (RCSLs) using Hordeum vulgare subsp spontaneum as a source of donor alleles in a Hordeum vulgare subsp vulgare background. Genome. 2003;46:1010–1023. doi: 10.1139/g03-080. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mickelson S, See D, Meyer FD, Garner JP, Foster CR, Blake TK, Fischer AM. Mapping of QTL associated with nitrogen storage and remobilization in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves. J Exp Bot. 2003;54:801–812. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg084. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • MEBAK, Mitteleuropäische Brautechnische Analysenkommission (1997) Methodensammlung der Mitteleuropäischen Analysenkommission. Band I, 3. Auflage: Rohstoffe––Wasser, Gerste, Rohfrucht, Malz, Hopfen und Hopfenprodukte, ISBN 3-9805814-0-3
  • Obando J, Fernandez-Trujillo JP, Martinez JA, Alarcon AL, Eduardo I, Arus P, Monforte AJ. Identification of melon fruit quality quantitative trait loci using near-isogenic lines. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;133:139–151.
  • Oziel A, Hayes PM, Chen FQ, Jones B. Application of quantitative trait locus mapping to the development of winter-habit malting barley. Plant Breed. 1996;115:43–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00869.x. [Cross Ref]
  • Panozzo JF, Eckermann PJ, Mather DE, Moody DB, Black CK, Collins HM, Barr AR, Lim P, Cullis BR. QTL analysis of malting quality traits in two barley populations. Aust J Agr Res. 2007;58:858–866. doi: 10.1071/AR06203. [Cross Ref]
  • Pelger S, Sall T, Bengtsson BO. Evolution of hordein gene organization in three Hordeum species. Hereditas. 1993;119:219–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1993.00219.x. [Cross Ref]
  • Pillen K, Zacharias A, Léon J. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Theor Appl Genet. 2003;107:340–352. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1253-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pillen K, Zacharias A, Léon J. Comparative AB-QTL analysis in barley using a single exotic donor of Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108:1591–1601. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1586-z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Powell W, Thomas WTB, Baird E, Lawrence P, Booth A, Harrower B, McNicol JW, Waugh R. Analysis of quantitative traits in barley by the use of amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Heredity. 1997;79:48–59. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.122. [Cross Ref]
  • Rae SJ, Macaulay M, Ramsay L, Leigh F, Matthews D, O’Sullivan DM, Donini P, Morris PC, Powell W, Marshall DF, Waugh R, Thomas WTB. Molecular barley breed. Euphytica. 2007;158:295–303. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9166-8. [Cross Ref]
  • Rostoks N, Mudie S, Cardle L, Russell J, Ramsay L, Booth A, Svensson JT, Wanamaker SI, Walia H, Rodriguez EM, Hedley PE, Liu H, Morris J, Close TJ, Marshall DF, Waugh R. Genome-wide SNP discovery and linkage analysis in barley based on genes responsive to abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;274:515–527. doi: 10.1007/s00438-005-0046-z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rostoks N, Ramsay L, MacKenzie K, Cardle L, Bhat PR, Roose ML, Svensson JT, Stein N, Varshney RK, Marshall DF, Graner A, Close TJ, Waugh R. Recent history of artificial outcrossing facilitates whole-genome association mapping in elite inbred crop varieties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18656–18661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606133103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rousseaux MC, Jones CM, Adams D, Chetelat R, Bennett A, Powell A. QTL analysis of fruit antioxidants in tomato using Lycopersicon pennellii introgression lines. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;111:1396–1408. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0071-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schmalenbach I, Körber N, Pillen K. Selecting a set of wild barley introgression lines and verification of QTL effects for resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;117:1093–1106. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0847-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schmalenbach I, Léon J, Pillen K. Identification and verification of QTLs for agronomic traits using wild barley introgression lines. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:483–497. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0915-z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • See D, Kanazin V, Kephart K, Blake T. Mapping genes controlling variation in barley grain protein concentration. Crop Sci. 2002;42:680–685.
  • Thomas WTB. Prospects for molecular breeding of barley. Ann Appl Biol. 2003;142:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2003.tb00223.x. [Cross Ref]
  • Thomas WTB, Powell W, Waugh R, Chalmers KJ, Barua UM, Jack P, Lea V, Forster BP, Swanston JS, Ellis RP, Hanson PR, Lance RCM. Detection of quantitative trait loci for agronomic, yield, grain and disease characters in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Theor Appl Genet. 1995;91:1037–1047. doi: 10.1007/BF00223917. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, Dunford RP, Laurie DA. The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science. 2005;310:1031–1034. doi: 10.1126/science.1117619. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Uauy C, Brevis JC, Dubcovsky J. The high grain protein content gene Gpc-B1 accelerates senescence and has pleiotropic effects on protein content in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:2785–2794. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl047. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K. Development of candidate introgression lines using an exotic barley accession (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) as donor. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:1736–1745. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1818-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K. AB-QTL analysis in spring barley: III. Identification of exotic alleles for the improvement of malting quality in spring barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum) Mol Breed. 2008;21:81–93. doi: 10.1007/s11032-007-9110-1. [Cross Ref]
  • Weeden NF. Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: is there a common genetic basis to the ‘domestication syndrome’ for legumes. Ann Bot-London. 2007;100:1017–1025. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wenzl P, Li HB, Carling J, Zhou MX, Raman H, Paul E, Hearnden P, Maier C, Xia L, Caig V, Ovesna J, Cakir M, Poulsen D, Wang JP, Raman R, Smith KP, Muehlbauer GJ, Chalmers KJ, Kleinhofs A, Huttner E, Kilian A. A high-density consensus map of barley linking DArT markers to SSR, RFLP and STS loci and agricultural traits. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Xiong LZ, Liu KD, Dai XK, Dai XK, Xu CG, Zhang Q. Identification of genetic factors controlling domestication-related traits of rice using an F2 population of a cross between Oryza sativa and O. rufipogon. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;98:243–251. doi: 10.1007/s001220051064. [Cross Ref]
  • Zamir D. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:983–989. doi: 10.1038/35103589. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang WS, Li X, Liu JB. Genetic variation of Bmy1 alleles in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) investigated by CAPS analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114:1039–1050. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0497-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zheng TQ, Xu JL, Li ZK, Zhai HQ, Wan JM. Genomic regions associated with milling quality and grain shape identified in a set of random introgression lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Breed. 2007;126:158–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01357.x. [Cross Ref]
  • Zwickert-Menteur S, Jestin L, Branlard G. Amy2 polymorphism as a possible marker of β-glucanase activity in barley (Hordeum vulgare L) J Cereal Sci. 1996;24:55–63. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.1996.0037. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer