Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plospathPLoS PathogensSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Pathog. 2010 March; 6(3): e1000826.
Published online 2010 March 26. doi:  10.1371/journal.ppat.1000826
PMCID: PMC2845658

Inhibition of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Ameliorates Ocular Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Induced Keratitis

Michael S. Gilmore, Editor


Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes severe sight-threatening corneal infections, with the inflammatory response to the pathogen being the major factor resulting in damage to the cornea that leads to loss of visual acuity. We found that mice deficient for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a key regulator of inflammation, had significantly reduced consequences from acute P. aeruginosa keratitis. This improvement in the outcome was manifested as improved bacterial clearance, decreased neutrophil infiltration, and decreased inflammatory responses when P. aeruginosa-infected MIF knock out (KO) mice were compared to infected wild-type mice. Recombinant MIF applied to infected corneas restored the susceptibility of MIF deficient mice to P. aeruginosa-induced disease, demonstrating that MIF is necessary and sufficient to cause significant pathology at this immune privileged site. A MIF inhibitor administered during P. aeruginosa-induced infection ameliorated the disease-associated pathology. MIF regulated epithelial cell responses to infection by enhancing synthesis of proinflammatory mediators in response to P. aeruginosa infection and by promoting bacterial invasion of corneal epithelial cells, a correlate of virulence in the keratitis model. Our results uncover a host factor that elevates inflammation and propagates bacterial cellular invasion, and further suggest that inhibition of MIF during infection may have a beneficial therapeutic effect.

Author Summary

Pseudomonas aeruginosa can induce infections that lead to a rapid loss of visual function. The current therapy includes antibiotic treatment which reduces the bacterial burden; nevertheless, tissue damage occurs as a result of an uncontrolled inflammation. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are needed that will combine antimicrobial treatment with anti-inflammatory treatment. Our experiments have uncovered that mice deficient for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) recovered from acute bacterial infection more efficiently than wild-type control mice. This improvement was manifested as improved bacterial clearance, and decreased inflammatory responses in the MIF knockouts when compared to P. aeruginosa-infected wild-type control mice. We find that treatment of the infected mice with small molecule inhibitor of MIF activity after the onset of the infection promoted recovery from disease. This approach will facilitate generation of novel treatment strategies for bacterial keratitis.


Eye trauma and contact lens wear are the main factors that predispose to the development of infectious keratitis associated with vision loss and blindness [1],[2]. The organism most often isolated from contact lens associated corneal ulcers is Pseudomonas aeruginosa [3],[4]. Existing therapies often fail to control the excessive tissue damage that is induced during P. aeruginosa infection [5]. While antibiotic treatment reduces the bacterial burden, tissue damage still occurs as a result of an poorly-controlled local inflammation. Hence, new therapeutic modalities are needed to control the inflammatory response in addition to the antibiotic treatments. We hypothesized that the innate immunity factor–MIF (NP 002406)–could promote the pathogenic consequences of P. aeruginosa infection by potentiating local inflammation, and, if so, could be a suitable drug target for treatment.

MIF is an innate immunity molecule with ubiquitous tissue expression leading to induction of proinflammatory activities. MIF was originally described as a regulator of macrophage responses [6]. It directly or indirectly promotes expression of a large panel of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α (P01375), IFN-γ (P 01579), IL-1β (NP 000566), IL-2 (AAA 59140), IL-6 (CAG 29292), IL-8 (CAG 46948), MIP-2 (AAF 78449), NO, COX2 (P 00403), products of the arachidonic acid pathway and matrix metalloproteinases [7]. Interestingly, low levels of MIF can override the anti-inflammatory properties of glucocorticoids by reversing the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoid on production of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 [8]. Detailed studies performed in the rat have shown that preformed MIF protein is released into the circulation within 6 hrs of LPS injection [9]. LPS toxicity is exacerbated by co-injection of recombinant MIF (rMIF) with LPS, whereas neutralization of MIF activity reduces the circulating levels of TNF-α by 50% and rescues mice from lethal LPS-induced endotoxic shock [10],[11]. All these properties of the MIF molecule suggest that MIF has a prominent regulatory role related to inflammation, likely with a critical function as an effector molecule that is active early in the course of infection with a pathologic function when continued production exacerbates inflammation, giving rise to attendant tissue pathology.

The contribution of MIF during responses to infections by a variety of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites is currently an area of active research. Recent clinical correlative studies have demonstrated increased MIF levels and elevated MIF-dependent proinflammatory cytokines are produced during H1N5 influenza infection, dengue fever, and bacterial urinary tract infections [12],[13],[14]. These results demonstrate an important contribution of MIF to the pathogenesis of viral or bacterial induced inflammation and suggest a possible beneficial role of neutralizing MIF as an adjunctive therapeutic approach to treat the severe forms of disease.

In the eye, the high levels of MIF protein expression and consequent inhibition of cellular migration has supported the conclusion that MIF contributes to the establishment of the eye's immune privilege status due to immunosuppressive activities [15],[16],[17],[18]. While this could be important in the resting state, the strong impact MIF has on induction of inflammation in response to infection suggests a different role for this molecule during active infection. In this study, we tested whether inhibition of MIF in the eye led to a decrease in P. aeruginosa-induced pathology, and if this was associated with decreased PMN infiltration and thus decreased inflammation and corneal pathology. Overall, we found that inhibition of MIF had a pronounced salutary effect on eye pathology emanating from P. aeruginosa keratitis, which we associated with a better ability of PMN from MIF-deficient mice to mediate opsonic killing of this organism, making MIF a promising therapeutic target to control local inflammation in the context of P. aeruginosa corneal infection.


Bacterial burdens after Pseudomonas aeruginosa eye infection are elevated in WT mice compared with MIF KO mice

To determine the effect of MIF on P. aeruginosa-induced keratitis, MIF KO and C57Bl6 WT mice were infected with P. aeruginosa strain 6294 and the bacterial levels in the corneas of mice measured to monitor disease progression. At 24 h after onset of infection there were modest but significantly (P = 0.04) lower bacterial levels in both the extracellular and intracellular samples from the corneas of the infected MIF KO mice when compared to C57Bl6 control animals (Fig. 1A). However, the corneal pathology scores of MIF KO and C57Bl6 were comparable at 24 h.

Figure 1
MIF KO mice are protected from P. aeruginosa-induced infection.

At 48 h after infection the differences between the MIF KO and C57Bl6 mice increased dramatically: there were about 100-fold fewer bacteria recovered from the corneal cell exterior in the infected MIF KO mice compared to the C57Bl6 controls. Even more dramatically, about 10,000 less intracellular bacteria were recovered from MIF KO mice when compared to C57Bl6 mice (Fig. 1B). Consistent with the reduced bacterial levels, the MIF KO mice infected with P. aeruginosa strain 6294 had a significant decrease in corneal pathology (P = 0.001).

As is known from published data [19], if a P. aeruginosa corneal infection is left to proceed for a longer period of time in C57Bl6 mice, perforation of the cornea occurs. This outcome was observed in an additional group of C57BL6 control mice, but not in MIF KO mice in the C57Bk6 background (Fig. 1C). This reduced pathology in the MIF KO mice was observed across a range of bacterial challenge doses from 1×106 (data not shown) to 1×107 cfu/mouse eye (Fig. 1C). The improved outcomes in MIF KO mice was also obtained with P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 48 h following infection (Figure S1).

MIF deficiency regulates inflammatory responses during P. aeruginosa keratitis

Since MIF regulates the pro-inflammatory responses to LPS challenge in vitro as well as in several in vivo models, we examined how MIF might modulate the molecular responses to P. aeruginosa induced keratitis by measuring local cytokine production based on prior findings as to which mediators are regulated by MIF and a small-scale microarray analysis we performed (data not shown) on infected corneas from WT and MIF KO mice to suggest which cytokines might be candidates for a more thorough investigation. A panel of five cytokines, TNF-α, IL-1β, KC, IL-6, and IL-10, were quantified at the protein level in infected corneas harvested from individual animals. Infected MIF KO mice had significantly lower levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and KC protein in corneal homogenates compared to corneas from infected C57Bl6 mice. There was no difference in the levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Inflammatory responses in the corneas of MIF KO and C57Bl6 mice infected with P. aeruginosa strain 6294.

MIF deficiency modulates PMN infiltration to the site of infection in the eye

To determine if differences in inflammatory responses translate into differences in the presence of infiltrating PMNs during infection, histologic observations were carried out. C57Bl/6 mice showed destruction of the epithelial layer of the cornea and elevated infiltration of PMNs in the aqueous chamber. In contrast, in the MIF KO mice, there were less infiltrating PMNs, less edema, and no destruction of the epithelial layer (Fig. 3A and 3B) when either strain 6294 or PAO1 were used to induce infections. The pathology in the C57Bl/6 corneas was consistent with an acute P. aeruginosa infection.

Figure 3
Histological examination of mouse corneas inoculated with P. aeruginosa 6294 or PAO1 at 48 h post-challenge.

The findings on bacterial levels and PMN infiltration into the P. aeruginosa-infected cornea indicated that MIF promoted PMN infiltration leading to more pathology while also inhibiting the clearance of this microbe from the cornea. To determine a potential cellular basis for the improved outcomes in MIF-deficient mice, we compared the opsonic killing activity of PMNs obtained from MIF-sufficient and MIF-deficient animals. MIF-deficient PMNs phagocytosed P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 more efficiently that MIF-sufficient PMNs, as evident by the decreased number of P. aeruginosa recovered from the PMN/bacteria mixture at the end of the experiment (Fig. 3D).

MIF promotes expression of proinflammatory cytokines in primary corneal epithelial cells

Since it is well documented that human epithelial cells participate in neutrophil recruitment in response to infection, we determined if MIF affects IL-8 synthesis by corneal epithelial cells [20],[21],[22]. Primary human corneal epithelial cells were grown to confluence, treated with either a siRNA to knock-down MIF or with a control (control) siRNA (Fig. 4A). Seventy-two h after the knock-down cells were infected with P. aeruginosa strain 6294 (Fig. 4B). We also evaluated the effect of adding recombinant MIF (rMIF) to cells treated with siRNA for MIF. Tissue culture supernatants were collected and IL-8 levels measured by ELISA. P. aeruginosa infection induced IL-8 expression in control siRNA-treated cells, whereas IL-8 production was much less pronounced in MIF siRNA-treated cells (ANOVA, P<0.01) (Fig. 4B). Treatment with rMIF reconstituted P. aeruginosa-induced IL-8 production in MIF-siRNA treated cells. Protein concentrations in cellular lysates were determined and no differences found, indicating no major changes in cellular numbers occurred during the experiments.

Figure 4
Corneal epithelial cells produce less IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β after infection with P. aeruginosa strain 6294 when MIF levels are reduced or MIF tautomerase activity inhibited.

We next analyzed the effect of a small molecule inhibitor of the MIF tautomerase activity, 4-IPP, on P. aeruginosa-induced inflammation. Published studies have demonstrated that 4-IPP forms covalent complexes with MIF, and, hence, inhibits MIF activity [23]. Treatment with 4-IPP almost completely abolished IL-8 synthesis. This effect of 4-IPP was observed at concentrations of 200 µM and 400 µM (Fig. 4C). Since we were concerned that the 4-IPP treatment could induce cellular apoptosis due to the documented role of MIF in promoting cell survival [24],[25], we next analyzed lysates obtained from non-treated and P. aeruginosa strain 6294 infected cells in the presence or absence of 400 µM 4-IPP and probed for activated caspase 3 as a marker for apoptosis. At 6 h post infection we did not observe activation of caspase 3, however some activation was detected at 24 h post-infection (Figure S2). Hence, we have performed the majority of our infection experiments within 6 h post-infection. When epithelial cells were stimulated by P. aeruginosa strains 6294 or PAO1 both IL-1β and IL-6 secretion was abolished in the presence of the MIF inhibitor (Fig. 4D).

As P. aeruginosa bacteria found in the cornea during infection are mostly intracellular, we determined if MIF modulated the uptake of bacteria by corneal epithelial cells using in vitro invasion assays. Inhibition of MIF by either siRNA treatment or by treatment with small molecule inhibitor 4-IPP, significantly decreased the internalized levels of P. aeruginosa in primary human corneal epithelial cells (Fig. 5). These findings suggest that MIF modifies epithelial responses facilitating bacterial entry in the epithelial cells and thus inhibits the niche that P. aeruginosa uses to survive and escape from PMNs recruited to the eye in response to infection.

Figure 5
4-IPP inhibits P. aeruginosa invasion of corneal epithelial cells.

Recombinant MIF restores the wild-type response to P. aeruginosa-induced acute bacterial keratitis in MIF KO mice

To verify that MIF was the major factor responsible for the reduced infectious complications of P. aeruginosa keratitis in MIF KO mice, reconstitution experiments were performed. One µg of rMIF administered topically onto the eye of infected MIF KO mice restored the wild-type response to infection with P. aeruginosa strain 6294 (Fig. 6). This increased bacterial burden in the reconstituted MIF KO correlated with elevated pathology scores, indicative of increased susceptibility to infection.

Figure 6
rMIF restores sensitivity to P. aeruginosa-induced disease in MIF KO mice.

Inhibition of MIF activity by 4-IPP promotes recovery from P. aeruginosa-induced keratitis

To analyze the effect of MIF inhibition during P. aeruginosa-induced keratitis, cohorts of C57Bl6 mice were infected with 5×105 cfu/mouse of P. aeruginosa strain 6294 and treated topically with gentamicin starting 24 h post-infection. A separate cohort of infected C57Bl6 mice received both 4-IPP IP and gentamicin eye-drops on the same schedule. Animals were monitored for 5 days to analyze recovery from infection and the infected corneas were harvested to quantify the intracellular and extracellular bacteria. Mice that received the 4-IPP and gentamicin treatment cleared P. aeruginosa more efficiently than did the group treated only with gentamicin as demonstrated by the significantly decreased extracellular and intracellular cfu recovered from the corneas, and decreased pathology scores (Fig. 7).

Figure 7
Treatment with 4-IPP promotes recovery from P. aeruginosa-induced corneal infection and pathology.


Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes serious corneal disease, associated with acute ocular inflammation. Both bacterial and host factors contribute to the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa keratitis, indicating that the optimal interventions for this infection will involve both control of bacterial levels and modulation of inflammation to limit pathology while not compromising bacterial clearance. Here, we demonstrated that a master regulator of inflammation–MIF–promoted both pathology associated with P. aeruginosa corneal infection and inhibited bacterial clearance as shown by outcomes in MIF-KO mice which had decreased bacterial burdens in the corneas, decreased inflammation, and decreased neutrophil infiltration compared to MIF-sufficient WT mice. These improved outcomes in MIF-deficient mice could be reversed by treating P. aeruginosa-infected eyes with rMIF and could be mimicked in WT mice treated with the MIF inhibitor 4-IPP. Thus, it appears that one host molecule makes a major contribution to both aspects of disease resulting from P. aeruginosa corneal infection, indicating a high potential for ameliorating the consequences of this infection by therapies that target the activities of MIF.

To define mechanisms associated with the effects of MIF in P. aeruginosa keratitis we used in vitro studies to show that reduction of MIF levels by siRNA treatment or by the use of the tautomerase inhibitor of MIF, 4-IPP, results in decreased production of IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-6 by human corneal epithelial cells after infection. Consistent with this finding, the absence of MIF in vivo also reduced inflammatory responses to P. aeruginosa during experimental murine corneal infection. Furthermore, we also found that PMNs from MIF-deficient mice had a better innate ability to kill P. aeruginosa in an in vitro opsonic-killing assay, indicating a likely cellular basis for the better control of infection in thee animals. Of note, Niederkorn and colleagues [18] found that MIF inhibits perforin release by NK cells and inhibits NK cell motility, indicating a contribution of MIF to the immune-privileged status of the eye. Thus, it appears in the basal state MIF limits cellular activation, but a consequence of this is that the responses to infection are dampened and the increased infiltration of PMN into the infected cornea that is needed to deal with the increased bacterial burdens results in more tissue pathology. A similar improved outcome from P. aeruginosa lung infection was reported for MIF-deficient mice [11].

Successful recovery form acute bacterial infection depends on timely recruitment of neutrophils. PMNs are present in the cornea and aqueous chamber in MIF deficient mice at reduced levels when compared to infected WT control mice, yet, there are sufficient numbers of PMNs recruited in the MIF KO to clear bacteria, as demonstrated by the decreased levels of P. aeruginosa measured at 48 h after the onset of infection. Hence, MIF deficiency both reduces pathology during infection and still allows for sufficient host responses to clear bacteria. Our data suggests that in infected mouse corneas, inflammatory mediators such as KC or MIP2 are initially released by corneal epithelial cells or keratocytes which in turn recruit PMNs to effectively handle bacterial infections in the eye [26], a process that occurs in the infected MIF KO mice leading to resolution of infection. In contrast, in the infected C57Bl6 mice these mediators are produced at higher levels and become part of a classic hypersensitivity response that contributes to tissue damage and elevated pathology [27],[28]. Taken together these data suggest that by modulating the level of inflammation occurring in the eye triggered by P. aeruginosa infection it is possible to promote expression of proinflammatory mediators sufficient to control infection while also preventing inflammation-induced corneal pathology and associated loss of vision.

Materials and Methods


Ethics Statement: All studies were performed in accordance with the Harvard Medical School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines (approval date 10/14/2008; number IACUC 02432).

Breeding pairs of mif knock-out (KO) mice were a kind gift from Dr. C. Gerard (Children's Hospital Boston). Control mice (C57Bl6) were obtained from Taconic Farms. Mice were housed and bred in the Channing Laboratory Animal Care Facilities. Mice were housed and bred in one of the Harvard Medical Area Animal Care Facilities.

Bacterial strains and inocula

P. aeruginosa strains PAO1 and 6294 were used throughout these experiments. Effects from low dose (5×105 cfu/eye) and high dose (1×107 cfu/eye) inocula were evaluated to determine the doses to use in the in vivo infection studies. Generally, the bacterial strains were grown o/n at 37C on Tryptic Soy Broth agar plates prior to experiments.

Infection model

The experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Harvard Medical Area Office for Research Subject Protection and were consistent with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology guidelines for studies in animals. Infections were carried out as described previously [29]. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine injections. Three 0.5 cm scratches were made on the cornea and an inoculum of P. aeruginosa delivered in 5 µl onto the eye. Mice remained sedated for about 30 min. For evaluation of corneal pathology, daily scores are recorded by an observer unaware of the experimental status of the animals based on a the following scoring system using a graded scale of 0 to 4 as follows: 0, eye macroscopically identical to the uninfected contra-lateral control eye; 1, faint opacity partially covering the pupil; 2, dense opacity covering the pupil; 3, dense opacity covering the entire anterior segment; and 4, perforation of the cornea, phthisis bulbi (shrinkage of the globe after inflammatory disease), or both. To determine the levels of bacteria in the cornea 24 or 48 h after infection, mice were sacrificed, eyes enucleated and corneas dissected from the ocular surface. To quantify the extracellular levels of P. aeruginosa, corneas were excised and suspended in PBS, vortexed, serial dilutions made and plated on P. aeruginosa selective cetrimide plates. To measure the intracellular levels of P. aeruginosa, the intact corneas were placed in F12 medium containing 5% FBS and 300 µg gentamicin/ml for 60 min, vigorously rinsed to wash away the antibiotic and the tissue then homogenized in 0.05% Triton X100 in 5% FBS-F12, diluted in 5% FBS-F12, and plated for bacterial counts. For treatment, groups of mice were infected with P. aeruginosa strain 6294, treated topically daily for 5 days with 5 µl of a solution of 100 µg gentamicin/ml, along with 50 µl of 1 M 4-IPP injected IP. The 4-IPP was solubilized in DMSO/corn oil [23]. Bacteria were quantified 5 days after infection by homogenizing and plating the corneal tissue.

Reconstitution experiments

Mice were infected with P. aeruginosa strain 6294 and 1 µg recombinant MIF (rMIF). applied topically in 5 µl at the time of infection and subsequently every 6 h after the infection. Corneas were harvested after 48 h of infection, treated with 300 µg gentamicin/ml for 60 min, washed, homogenized with F12 medium containing 5% FBS and 0.05% Triton X100, diluted and plated.

Histopathology examinations

Eyes were enucleated from euthanized mice and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde then embedded in paraffin. Four µm sections were cut, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin to visualize tissue morphology following previously used techniques [30].

In vitro infection assays

Primary corneal epithelial cells [31] were grown in 6-well plates in either keratinocyte SFM (Invitrogen) medium supplemented with antibiotics, EGF, and pituitary gland extract or in MEM/F12 mix supplemented with EGF, insulin, DMSO, and cholera toxin [31]. Confluent monolayers of corneal cells were treated for 1 h with 4-IPP then infected with different strains of P. aeruginosa (PAO1, 6294) at a MOI of 25 for 1 h. Following treatment for 1 h with 300 µg gentamicin/ml, cells were re-supplemented with growth medium. The keratinocyte SFM growth medium was supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, EGF, and pituitary gland extract. 6-iodo-6-phenylpirimidine (4-IPP) was used to inhibit MIF activity in vitro and was maintained during the infection and gentamicin treatments. Different concentrations of 4–IPP were used, ranging from 100 µM to 400 µM. The tissue culture supernatants were collected at 6 h and 24 h after infection and total cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% SDS, and Complete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics).

Epithelial cell invasion assay

P. aeruginosa strains 6294 or PAO1 were grown to mid-log phase in TSB for 2 h at 37C and used for invasion assays. Bacterial cells were washed and suspended in F12 medium. Human primary corneal epithelial cells were grown to confluence in 6 well plates in F12 medium and infected with the P. aeruginosa strains at a MOI of 25 for 3 h. After the infection, cells were washed with F12, then treated with 300 µg or 400 µg gentamicin/ml for 1 h to kill the extracellular bacteria depending on the activity of the antibiotic. After washing away the antibiotic, cells were lysed in 1% Triton X 100 in MEM and the lysates were diluted then plated on cetrimide plates to enumerate intracellular bacteria.

Cytokine analysis

Commercially available ELISA assays (R&D Systems) were used to determine the levels of cytokines (IL-8, IL-6) produced by P. aeruginosa infected primary human corneal cells. Mouse cytokines were measured using a Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) multiplex 7-spot electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay and outputs measured by an ultra low noise charge-coupled device (CCD) Imager 2400 (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The cytokines measured included interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-12p70, IL-10, IFNγ and the alpha chemokine neutrophil attractant and activator CXCL1/GRO (also known as KC). The MSD ECL platform has been previously validated against cytokine standards recommended by WHO and U.K. National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) and by comparison to traditional ELISA [32].

siRNA experiments

Production of MIF by the primary corneal epithelial cells was reduced by MIF-specific siRNA treatment. Briefly, cells were transfected with MIF-specific or control siRNA (On-target plus SMART pool; Dharmacon) by incubating with a transfection mixture that consists of 50 nM siRNA (Dharmacon) and 6 µl Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) in 1 ml of Opti-MEM (Gibco) for 48 h, after which the cells were maintained with regular growth medium. Epithelial cells were infected with P. aeruginosa (strain 6294 or strain PAOI) 48 h to 72 h after siRNA treatment. A non-siRNA treated control was also included to determine if there is an effect on inflammatory gene expressing from the control siRNA.

Purification of PMNs and opsonophagocytic assays

Murine PMNs were purified from bone marrow by flushing the cells out of the tibias and femurs with 3 ml HBSS (Hanks balanced salt solution) buffer (Invitrogen). Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 380 g for 10 min at tabletop centrifuge; resuspended in 1 ml HBSS and overlayed on the top of a Histopaque gradient composed of 3 ml Histopaque 1119 (Sigma) and 3 ml Histopaque 1077 (Sigma). Cells were centrigufed for 30 min at 700 g, room temperature, without a brake. Neutrophils were collected from the interface of the Histopague 1077 and 1119, transferred to a fresh tube and washed three times by adding 10 ml og HBSS. Viable cells were enumerated by tryptan blue exclusion technique.

Opsonophagocytic assays were performed by mixing 100 µl of 2.5×106 PMN with 100 µl of 400 fold dilution of P. aeruginosa grown in TSB to reach mid-log phase as estimated by OD 650 reading of 0.4. 100 µl of Rabbit complement sera (Sigma) and 100 µl of freshly harvested mouse sera from either C57Bl6 or MIF KO mice were added to the sample mixture as appropriate. The reaction was incubated for 90 min at 37°C with rotation. After completion of the incubation an aliquot was taken and lyzed with 0.05% Tween 20/TSB. Bacteria were enumerated by plating on P. aeruginosa selective cetrimide plates.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

MIF KO mice are protected from P. aeruginosa PAO1-induced keratitis 48 h after infection. Extracellular and intracellular levels of P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 48 h following infection with 106 cfu onto the eyes of WT C57/Bl6 or MIF KO mice. Points indicate individual mice, bars the medians. Significantly different levels of PAO1 were detected both extracellularly P = 0.03 and intracellularly P = 0.0025, Mann-Whitney U test. Pathology scores. P = 0.008, Mann-Whitney U test. The data are from one representative experiment out of three performed.

(1.25 MB EPS)

Figure S2

Cellular apoptosis during infection and 4-IPP treatment. A. Corneal epithelial cells were infected with either P. aeruginosa 6294 in the presence of 4-IPP or DMSO control treatment and cellular lysates were collected at either 6 h post-infection or 24 h post-infection. Lysates were loaded on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel, blotted and developed with antibody to activated caspase-3 or antibody to actin. B. Corneal epithelial cells were infected with either P. aeruginosa 6294 in the presence of 4-IPP or DMSO control treatment, 6 h post-infection cells were trypsinized and live/dead bacteria were quantified by Tryptan Blue exclusion assay. The percent of live cells were plotted.

(0.66 MB EPS)


Dr. R. A. Mitchell holds a patent on the use of 4-IPP and its derivatives.

This work has been supported by EY016144 grant to G.B.P., Fight for Sight Foundation grant, and EY019944 grant to M.G. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Robertson DM, Petroll WM, Jester JV, Cavanagh HD. The role of contact lens type, oxygen transmission, and care-related solutions in mediating epithelial homeostasis and pseudomonas binding to corneal cells: an overview. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:394–398; discussion 399–400. [PubMed]
2. Robertson DM, Petroll WM, Jester JV, Cavanagh HD. Current concepts: contact lens related Pseudomonas keratitis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30:94–107. [PubMed]
3. Fleiszig SM, Evans DJ. The pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis: studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85:271–278. [PubMed]
4. Fleiszig SM. The Glenn A. Fry award lecture 2005. The pathogenesis of contact lens-related keratitis. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:866–873. [PubMed]
5. O'Brien TP, Maguire MG, Fink NE, Alfonso E, McDonnell P. Efficacy of ofloxacin vs cefazolin and tobramycin in the therapy for bacterial keratitis. Report from the Bacterial Keratitis Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1257–1265. [PubMed]
6. Calandra T, Roger T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:791–800. [PubMed]
7. Flaster H, Bernhagen J, Calandra T, Bucala R. The macrophage migration inhibitory factor-glucocorticoid dyad: regulation of inflammation and immunity. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:1267–1280. [PubMed]
8. Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Metz CN, Spiegel LA, Bacher M, et al. MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature. 1995;377:68–71. [PubMed]
9. Bernhagen J, Calandra T, Cerami A, Bucala R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor is a neuroendocrine mediator of endotoxaemia. Trends Microbiol. 1994;2:198–201. [PubMed]
10. Calandra T, Bucala R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a counter-regulator of glucocorticoid action and critical mediator of septic shock. J Inflamm. 1995;47:39–51. [PubMed]
11. Bozza M, Satoskar AR, Lin G, Lu B, Humbles AA, et al. Targeted disruption of migration inhibitory factor gene reveals its critical role in sepsis. J Exp Med. 1999;189:341–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Assuncao-Miranda I, Amaral FA, Bozza FA, Fagundes CT, Sousa LP, et al. Contribution of macrophage migration inhibitory factor to the pathogenesis of dengue virus infection. FASEB J 2009 [PubMed]
13. Sevketoglu E, Yilmaz A, Gedikbasi A, Karyagar S, Kiyak A, et al. Urinary macrophage migration inhibitory factor in children with urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol 2009 [PubMed]
14. Hou XQ, Gao YW, Yang ST, Wang CY, Ma ZY, et al. Role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in influenza H5N1 virus pneumonia. Acta Virol. 2009;53:225–231. [PubMed]
15. Matsuda A, Tagawa Y, Yoshida K, Matsuda H, Nishihira J. Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in rat retina and its immunohistochemical localization. J Neuroimmunol. 1997;77:85–90. [PubMed]
16. Matsuda A, Tagawa Y, Matsuda H, Nishihira J. Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in corneal wound healing in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:1555–1562. [PubMed]
17. Matsuda A, Tagawa Y, Matsuda H, Nishihira J. Identification and immunohistochemical localization of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human cornea. FEBS Lett. 1996;385:225–228. [PubMed]
18. Apte RS, Sinha D, Mayhew E, Wistow GJ, Niederkorn JY. Cutting edge: role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in inhibiting NK cell activity and preserving immune privilege. J Immunol. 1998;160:5693–5696. [PubMed]
19. Hazlett LD. Inflammatory response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Ocul Surf. 2005;3:S139–141. [PubMed]
20. Zhang J, Wu XY, Yu FS. Inflammatory responses of corneal epithelial cells to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Curr Eye Res. 2005;30:527–534. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Zhu H, Conibear TC, Thuruthyil SJ, Willcox MD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing signal molecules induce IL-8 production by human corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:179–181. [PubMed]
22. Miyazaki D, Inoue Y, Araki-Sasaki K, Shimomura Y, Tano Y, et al. Neutrophil chemotaxis induced by corneal epithelial cells after herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. Curr Eye Res. 1998;17:687–693. [PubMed]
23. Winner M, Meier J, Zierow S, Rendon BE, Crichlow GV, et al. A novel, macrophage migration inhibitory factor suicide substrate inhibits motility and growth of lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:7253–7257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Liao H, Bucala R, Mitchell RA. Adhesion-dependent signaling by macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). J Biol Chem. 2003;278:76–81. [PubMed]
25. Lue H, Thiele M, Franz J, Dahl E, Speckgens S, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) promotes cell survival by activation of the Akt pathway and role for CSN5/JAB1 in the control of autocrine MIF activity. Oncogene. 2007;26:5046–5059. [PubMed]
26. Hazlett LD. Pathogenic mechanisms of P. aeruginosa keratitis: a review of the role of T cells, Langerhans cells, PMN, and cytokines. DNA Cell Biol. 2002;21:383–390. [PubMed]
27. Thakur A, Xue M, Stapleton F, Lloyd AR, Wakefield D, et al. Balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines correlates with outcome of acute experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Infect Immun. 2002;70:2187–2197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Xue ML, Thakur A, Willcox MD, Zhu H, Lloyd AR, et al. Role and regulation of CXC-chemokines in acute experimental keratitis. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76:221–231. [PubMed]
29. Preston MJ, Fleiszig SM, Zaidi TS, Goldberg JB, Shortridge VD, et al. Rapid and sensitive method for evaluating Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors during corneal infections in mice. Infect Immun. 1995;63:3497–3501. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Gadjeva M, Wang Y, Horwitz BH. NF-kappaB p50 and p65 subunits control intestinal homeostasis. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:2509–2517. [PubMed]
31. Zaidi TS, Lyczak J, Preston M, Pier GB. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-mediated corneal epithelial cell ingestion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a key component in the pathogenesis of experimental murine keratitis. Infect Immun. 1999;67:1481–1492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Fichorova RN, Richardson-Harman N, Alfano M, Belec L, Carbonneil C, et al. Biological and technical variables affecting immunoassay recovery of cytokines from human serum and simulated vaginal fluid: a multicenter study. Anal Chem. 2008;80:4741–4751. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science