PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. Apr 1, 2010; 60(573): 263–267.
PMCID: PMC2845488
Requests for euthanasia in general practice before and after implementation of the Dutch Euthanasia Act
Jojanneke E van Alphen, PhD, MD, Medical Student
University of Utrecht, The Netherlands
Gé A Donker, MD, PhD, GP, Epidemiologist, Project Leader Dutch Sentinel Stations and Richard L Marquet, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
Address for correspondence Dr Gé A Donker, NIVEL, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: g.donker/at/nivel.nl
Received September 28, 2009; Revised November 25, 2009; Accepted January 27, 2010.
Abstract
Background
The Netherlands was the first country in the world to implement a Euthanasia Act in 2002. It is unknown whether legalising euthanasia under strict conditions influences the number and nature of euthanasia requests.
Aim
To investigate changes in the number of, and reasons for, requests for euthanasia in Dutch general practice after implementation of the Euthanasia Act.
Design of study
Retrospective dynamic cohort study comparing 5 years before (1998–2002) and 5 years after (2003–2007) implementation of the Act.
Method
Standardised registration forms were used to collect data on requests for euthanasia via the Dutch Sentinel Practice Network. This network of 45 general practices is nationally representative by age, sex, geographic distribution, and population density.
Results
The mean annual incidence of requests before implementation amounted to 3.1/10 000 and thereafter to 2.8/10 000 patients. However, trends differed by sex. The number of requests by males decreased significantly from 3.7/10 000 to 2.6/10 000 (P = 0.008); the requests by females increased non-significantly from 2.6/10 000 to 3.1/10 000. Before and after implementation, cancer remained the major underlying disease for requesting euthanasia: 82% versus 77% for men; 73% versus 75% for females. Pain was a major reason for a request, increasing in the period before implementation (mean 27%), but declining in the period thereafter (mean 22%). Loss of dignity became a less important reason after implementation (from 18% to 10%, P = 0.04), predominantly due to a marked decrease in the number of females citing it as a reason (from 17% to 6%, P = 0.02).
Conclusion
There was no increase in demand for euthanasia after implementation of the Euthanasia Act. Pain as a reason for requesting euthanasia showed an increasing trend before implementation, but declined thereafter. Loss of dignity as a reason declined, especially in females.
Keywords: death, epidemiology, euthanasia, euthanasia Act, family practice, legislation, palliative care
Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of
Royal College of General Practitioners