Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
AIDS. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 2.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2844503

Postpartum Antiretroviral Drug Resistance in HIV-1-infected Women Receiving Pregnancy-Limited Antiretroviral Therapy

Roger Paredes,1,2 Irene Cheng,3 Daniel R. Kuritzkes,1 Ruth E. Tuomala,1 and the Women and Infants Transmission Study (WITS) Group



Pregnancy-limited antiretroviral therapy (PLAT) drastically reduces HIV-1 transmission to the newborn, but may select for antiretroviral drug resistance mutations (DRM) in mothers.


We evaluated antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-1-infected pregnant women who received PLAT between 1998 and 2005, and had 2- or 6-month postpartum plasma samples available with HIV-1 RNA levels (VL) >500 copies/mL. Postpartum DRM rates were assessed blindly using population sequencing (PS) and allele-specific PCR (ASPCR) of the M184V, K103N and D30N mutations. Factors associated with selection of DRM were investigated.


146 women were included. All women received zidovudine+lamivudine during pregnancy; 76% also received nelfinavir and 8.2% nevirapine. Resistance data were available from 114 women (78%). Postpartum rates of single-, dual-, and triple-class resistance were, respectively, 43.0%, 6.1% and 0% (63.2%, 10.5% and 1.7% by ASPCR). In women receiving dual or triple PLAT, respectively, postpartum M184V/I rates were 65.0% (95.0% by ASPCR) and 28.7% (51.6% by ASPCR), respectively (p<0.01). Postpartum NNRTI resistance rates among women receiving nevirapine were 25% for K103N (37.5% by ASPCR) and 12.5% for Y188C. PI resistance rates in women receiving nelfinavir were: 1.1% for D30N (1.1% by ASPCR) and 1.1% for L90M. Dual versus triple PLAT and prolonged zidovudine exposure were associated with selection of M184V. Nevirapine use and length of zidovudine plus lamivudine exposure were associated with selection of K103N.


PLAT is associated with frequent selection of resistance to drugs with low-genetic barrier. Triple-drug PLAT decreases the odds for M184V selection. Routine postpartum genotypic resistance testing may be useful to guide future treatment decisions in mothers.

Keywords: HIV-1, resistance, pregnancy, mother-to-child transmission, allele-specific PCR, minor variants


Programs to prevent mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission (MTCT) have averted thousands of new HIV-1 infections worldwide. Present rates of vertical transmission in women with sustained access to triple-drug antiretroviral therapy (ART), perinatal zidovudine treatment, elective C-sections, and alternatives to breast-feeding are extremely low.[1-5] Even a simplified approach based on the intrapartum and neonatal administration of a single dose of nevirapine with or without zidovudine, lamivudine or tenofovir has reduced MTCT in resource-poor areas. [6, 7] In spite of these successes, pre-existence of transmitted drug resistant viruses[8, 9] or selection of antiretroviral drug resistance during MTCT prophylaxis may hinder the long-term efficacy of MTCT preventive programs as well as severely constrain future treatment options for both mother and child.[7, 10-15]

A suitable way of investigating how often antiretroviral MTCT prophylaxis selects for drug-resistant HIV-1 in mothers is to assess the postpartum rates of resistant viruses in antiretroviral-naïve pregnant women who receive pregnancy-limited antiretroviral therapy (PLAT). Selection of resistant viruses during PLAT, even as minority variants, could impair the virological outcome when women subsequently initiate long-term ART,[16, 17] particularly if treatment is started within 6-12 months after delivery.[18, 19]

This study sought to investigate post-partum drug resistance in ARV-naive women who received PLAT in the US between 1998 and 2005, using population-based sequencing of plasma virus and allele-specific PCR testing for the M184V, K103N and D30N mutations, associated with high-level resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine, nevirapine and efavirenz, and nelfinavir, respectively. We also examined factors associated with an increased risk for selecting resistant viruses during pregnancy.


Study design

This was a substudy utilizing specimens obtained from participants in the Women and Infants Transmission Study (WITS).[20] The WITS is a multi-site observational study designed to examine the impact of HIV infection on HIV infected women and their infants. WITS sites are located in Brooklyn, NY; New York City, NY; Boston and Worcester MA; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; and Puerto Rico.


Women enrolled in WITS between June 1, 1998 and December 31, 2004, were evaluated for eligibility for this study. Study participants included HIV-1-infected pregnant women who had never received antiretroviral therapy before pregnancy, initiated PLAT consisting of zidovudine plus lamivudine either solely or in addition to either nevirapine or nelfinavir, stopped therapy postpartum, and had specimens available from 2- or 6-month postpartum visits during which the presence plasma virus by RNA-PCR testing had previously been documented. A single laboratory, blinded as to PLAT received by participants, analyzed all specimens. Specimens collected within the first 14 days of antiretroviral therapy were also analyzed post-hoc, when available. However as most PLAT initiation occurred prior to WITS enrollment, these specimens were lacking for the majority of women.

Detection of resistance mutations

Population sequencing of plasma viruses

HIV-1 RNA was extracted from 500 μL EDTA-anticoagulated plasma using the QIAamp® Viral RNA MiniKit (QIAGEN Sciences, Maryland, USA) after centrifugation at 24000g for 1 hour at 4°C. Part of each RNA sample was used for cDNA synthesis immediately after extraction, and the remainder was stored at −80°C.

The extracted RNA was transcribed to cDNA and amplified by PCR in a one-step process (Superscript III One-step RT-PCR with Platinum Taq Kit, Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Cycling conditions included an initial cDNA synthesis step at 55°C for 25 min followed by a denaturation step at 94°C for 2 min; 30 cycles of PCR amplification (94°C fof 40 sec, 60°C for 40 sec, 68°C for 1 min and 20 sec); and a final 5 min extension step at 68°C. The PCR mix contained 25 μL of 2X Reaction Mix (including 0.4 mmol/L of each dNTP and 3.2 mmol/L of MgCl2), 0.2 mmol/L of each primer OOPF (HXB2:2211-2232) [5′-GAAGCAGGAGCCGATAGACAAG-3′] and OOR2 (HXB2:3466-3444) [5′-TTTTCTGCCAGTTCTAGCTCTGC-3′], 15 μL of extracted RNA as template and nuclease-free H2O to a final volume of 50 μL.

The resulting PCR product was purified using the QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit (QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit, QIAGEN Sciences, Maryland, USA) and used as the starting template for a 30-cycle nested PCR amplification (High Fidelity Platinum Taq, Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) using primers OOPF2 (HXB2:2218-2241) [5′-GAGCCGATAGACAAGGAACTGTAT-3′] and OOR3 (HXB2:3457-3432) [5′-AGTTCTAGCTCTGCTTCTTCAGTTAG-3′].

The nested PCR product was purified and sequenced (3730XL DNA Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Resistance mutations and polymorphisms were defined according to the International AIDS-Society-USA Panel (Spring 2008 Update). [21] Standard phylogenetic analyses ruled out sequence contamination.

Allele-specific PCR

To quantify the proportion of mutant sequences contained within each specimen, 5 μL of RT-PCR product were added to the real-time PCR together with selective or nonselective primers. When the initial DNA copy number was lower than 106, the nested DNA product was used. PCR conditions have been previously published.[8, 22]

Mutant-specific primers ([HXB2:2319-2340] 5′-CTATTAGATACAGGAGCAAATA-3′ for D30N; [HXB2:3078-3098] 5′- GACATAGTTATCTATCAATICG-3′ for M184V; [HXB22884-2858] 5′-CCCACATCCAGTACTGTTACTGATTGG-3′ for the K103N AAC allele; and [HXB22884-2858] 5′-CCACATCCAGTACTGTTACTGATTCA-3′ for the K103N AAT allele) included the target codon in its 3′ end and an intentional mismatch at positions −3 or −2, relative to the 3′ end. Non-specific primers ([HXB2:2319-2339] 5′-CTATTAGATACAGGAGCAGAT-3′ for D30N; [HXB2:3078-3098] 5-GACATAGTTATCTATCAATAC-3′ for M184V; and [HXB22884-2859] 5′-CCCACATCCAGTACTGTTACTGATTT-3 for both AAC and AAT K103N alleles) were similar to the former, but ended just before the target base pair and did not include intentional mismatches. The antiparallel primer ([HXB2:2592-2571] 5′-CTGGCTTTAATTTTACTGGTAC-3′ for D30N; [HXB2:3277-3258] 5′-GGCTGTACTGTCCATTTATC-3′ for M184V; and [HXB22757-2785] 5′-AAATGGAGAAAATTAGTAGATTTCAGAGA-3′ for both AAC and AAT K103N alleles) was common for each pair of mutant-specific and non-specific reactions.

The different ASPCR assays were performed separately. Within each ASPCR assay, nonselective and selective amplifications were always performed in parallel. All reactions were performed in duplicate, and the mean of the two values was used for calculation. The percentage of viral sequences containing each mutation was calculated as follows: % mutant sequences = [(quantity of mutant sequences in the sample)/(quantity of total viral sequences in the sample)] × 100.

In addition to the sensitivity threshold for each ASPCR assay, we calculated a specific detection threshold per each sample, defined as the minimum proportion of variants that could be detected based on the specimen's HIV-1 RNA level (pVL), the volume of plasma used in the RNA extraction (V), the fraction of the RNA elution volume used for cDNA synthesis (fe), and the assumed efficiencies of the RNA extraction (ERNAX) and cDNA synthesis (EcDNA). The sample specific detection threshold was calculated as 1/ NRNA, where NRNA was the number of viral RNA copies that were effectively sampled after RNA extraction and reverse transcription. NRNA was calculated as: NRNA= pVL × V × fe × ERNAX× EcDNA. We assumed an ERNAX of 0.96 and an EcDNA of 0.7.[23, 24] Allele-specific PCR values between the ASPCR assay sensitivity threshold and the sample-specific detection threshold were considered undetectable.

Statistical analysis

Subjects' characteristics and postpartum rates of resistance mutations were described using standard descriptive methods. 95% confidence intervals for resistance mutation rates were generated using the Exact Binominal Test. Variables associated with the selection of M184V, K103N and D30N mutations were investigated using Chi-square, Fisher's exact test or F-test, as needed. Odds of developing M184V or K103N were evaluated using the Generalized Estimating Equations model (SAS procedure GENMOD).

Alpha was set at 0.05 for determining statistical significance in all univariate and multivariate analyses. For M184V and K103N mutations, the multivariate analysis models were built using forward selection technique. The multivariate analysis model only included characteristics that achieved statistical significance in the univariate analysis. All analyses were intention-to-treat.


Performance of the ASPCR assays

Using the mean plus 3 standard deviations of 20 negative control repeats (wild-type laboratory viral constructs), the detection threshold of the ASPCR was calculated at: 0.1%, 0.4% and 0.003% for the D30N, M184V and K103N ASPCR assays, respectively. Delta Cts between mutant and wild-type DNA equivalents were > 10 cycles for the D30N and M184V assays and > 17 cycles for the K103N assays. Proportion measurements were linear down to at least 1% for the D30N and M184V assays and to 0.01% for the K103N ASPCR assays.[17, 24]

Subject's characteristics

1328 women were enrolled in the WITS Study between June 1, 1998 and December 31, 2004; 636 of them were ART-naïve prior to current pregnancy; 315 women started and received one of the three targeted regimens (zidovudine + lamivudine; zidovudine + lamivudine + nevirapine; or zidovudine + lamivudine + nelfinavir) during more than 28 days during the index pregnancy. Of them, 146 women stopped therapy postpartum and had plasma specimens available from 2- or 6-month postpartum visits with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥ 500 copies/mL, thereby being included in the present study.

The mean age of the 146 women fulfilling the inclusion criteria was 27 years, most were African-American or Hispanic, the majority were CDC disease category A, and almost 30% had used hard drugs and/or had a known history of alcohol use prior to delivery (Table 1). The median gestational age was 29.3 years (IQR: 22.4 – 36.3 years). The median first CD4 count available during pregnancy was 455 cells/mm3 (IQR: 316 – 690 cells/mm3); being ≥ 200 cells/mm3 in more than 90% of women. The median time of blood sample collection was 2.2 months postpartum (IQR: 1.9-4.6 months), with 111 samples (76%) collected at the 2-month postpartum visit [median 2.0 months (IQR: 1.8-2.5 months)]; the remaining 35 samples (24%) were collected at the 6-month postpartum visit [median 6.2 months (IQR: 5.9 – 6.9 months)]. Median postpartum CD4+ counts were 575 cells/mm3 (IQR: 397-767), and median postpartum HIV-1 RNA levels were 4780 copies/mL (IQR: 1352-18121 copies/mL). Seventy women (48%) maintained HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL at all timepoints during PLAT after their enrollment in WITS; 40 (27%) had all HIV-1 RNA levels >400 copies/mL during PLAT, and the 33 (23%) alternated viremic with aviremic periods during PLAT. All women initiated PLAT including zidovudine + lamivudine; 93 (64%) also started nelfinavir and 10 (7%) nevirapine. Some women switched between dual- and triple-PLAT during pregnancy. Of the 146 women, 18 (12%) switched from dual- to triple-PLAT (1 added nevirapine and 17 added nelfinavir). Another 2 women switched between triple-PLAT with nevirapine and triple-PLAT with nelfinavir. The duration of exposure to zidovudine, lamivudine, nelfinavir and nevirapine are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Subject characteristics

Postpartum rates of antiretroviral resistance

Post-partum resistance data were available from 114 women (78%). The virological, immunological and clinical characteristics of this subset of women did not differ from those fulfilling the study inclusion criteria. Pre-treatment resistance data was available from 25 of these 114 women (22%). Twenty women (18%) remained on dual-PLAT through delivery whereas 94 (82%) received triple-PLAT during pregnancy.

Overall, 49 women (43.0%) had at least 1 resistance mutation detected by the population-based sequencing analysis postpartum; 7 women (6.1%) had dual-class resistance after delivery. Three (2.6%) had resistance to NRTIs and PIs, 3 (2.6%) had resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs and 1 (0.9%) had resistance to NNRTIs and PIs. When including the results from the ASPCR analysis for D30N, M184V and K103N mutations, 72 women (63.2%) had at least 1 resistance mutation detected postpartum, 12 women (10.5%) had dual-class resistance, and 2 (1.7%) women had triple-class resistance after delivery. Five women with dual-class resistance (4.4%) had resistance to NRTIs and PIs, whereas 7 (6.1%) had resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs.

NRTI resistance

Using population sequencing of plasma viruses, the M184V/I mutation was detected postpartum in 65.0% of women receiving dual PLAT throughout pregnancy compared to 28.7% of women treated with 3 drugs (p=0.004). (Table 2) Using ASPCR, this mutation was detected in 95.0% of women who had received dual PLAT and in 51.6% of those having received triple-drug PLAT. (p<0.001). Using ASPCR, the M184V mutation was detected postpartum in 2/5 (40%) women with M184V present by population sequencing at baseline and in 15/20 (75%) women who did not have this mutation before treatment.

Table 2
Postpartum Rates of Resistance to Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors.a,b

Mutations associated with resistance to nucleoside analogues (NAMs) were also more frequent among women exposed only to dual-drug PLAT (M41L, 5.0%; D67N, 5.0%; K70R, 10.0; and T215Y, 5.0%) than in those treated with 3 drugs (M41L, 1.1%; D67N, 1.1%; K70R, 1.1%; L210F, 1.1%; K219Q, 1.1%). Such differences were, at most, marginally significant.

NNRTI resistance

Using population sequencing of plasma viruses, the postpartum rates of NNRTI resistance among the eight women receiving nevirapine were: 25% [95% CI: 3.2%-65.1%] for K103N (2 cases), and 12.5%% [95% CI: 0.3%-52.7%] for Y188C (1 case). Using ASPCR, the K103N mutation was detected in three out of eight women exposed to nevirapine (37.5% [95 CI: 8.5%-75.5%]), including the two cases detected through population sequencing, and in 8 out of 106 women not exposed to nevirapine (7.5%) (p=0.029). Using ASPCR, the K103N mutation was detected postpartum in 1 woman harboring this mutation before treatment and in 2/24 (8.3%) women who did not have this mutation before starting PLAT.

PI resistance

Using population sequencing, each of the D30N and L90M mutations were detected in one out of 87 women receiving nelfinavir during PLAT (1.1% [95% CI: 0.03%-6.24%] for each mutation). The ASPCR testing confirmed the detection of the D30N mutation in one out of 87 women exposed to nelfinavir (1.1% [95% CI: 0.03%-6.24%]) and allowed detection of this mutation in two women out of 27 (7.4%) that did not receive nelfinavir during PLAT. One D30N mutation detected at baseline was not found post-partum.

Factors associated with selection of post-partum antiretroviral resistance

In the univariate analysis (Table 3), postpartum detection of the M184V mutation was more likely in women who had all HIV-1 RNA levels > 400 copies/mL during PLAT (OR= 2.65, 95%CI=1.02-6.87, p=0.05) relative to those who remaining aviremic through delivery, and in those with longer exposure to zidovudine (OR=1.25, 95%CI=1.01-1.54, p=0.04, per each additional month). The M184V mutation, conversely, was less likely to be observed in women who received triple-drug PLAT including either nelfinavir or nevirapine (OR=0.06, 95%CI=0.007-0.44, p=0.006), relative to dual therapy only; in those treated with triple-drug PLAT including nelfinavir (OR=0.06, 95% CI=0.008-0.46, p=0.007) or nevirapine (OR=0.04, 95% CI=0.003-0.48, p=0.01), relative to dual therapy alone; and in those treated with triple-drug PLAT including nelfinavir, relative to any other regimen (OR=0.25, 95%CI=1.01-1.54, p=0.04). Univariate factors associated with postpartum detection of K103N were nevirapine exposure (OR=7.35, 95%CI=1.48-36.5, p=0.01), and longer exposure to zidovudine (OR=1.40, 95%CI=1.02-1.91, p=0.04) or to the combination of zidovudine and lamivudine (OR=1.42, 95%CI=1.04-1.94, p=0.03).

Table 3
Factors associated with selection of the M184V and the K103N mutation during pregnancy-limited antiretroviral therapy. Univariate analysis.

In the multivariate analysis (Table 4), the variables significantly associated with selection of M184V were exposure to dual versus triple-drug PLAT (OR=19.64, 95%CI=2.47-156.25, p<0.01), and duration of zidovudine exposure (OR =1.29, 95%CI=1.03-1.63, p=0.03, per additional month). Variables associated with selection of K103N were nevirapine use during pregnancy (OR=9.75, 95%CI=1.62-58.84, p=0.01) and length of dual-PLAT zidovudine + lamivudine exposure (OR =1.46, 95%CI=1.05- 2.02, p=0.02, per additional month).

Table 4
Factors associated with selection of the M184V and the K103N mutation during pregnancy-limited antiretroviral therapy. Multivariate analysis.a

Of note, other factors such as presence of resistance mutations before starting PLAT, the first available CD4+ count during pregnancy, use of hard drugs before delivery, alcoholism before delivery, ethnicity, or age at delivery, were not associated with the postpartum detection of the M184V or K103N mutations.


This study showed high post-partum antiretroviral resistance rates in antiretroviral-naïve women receiving PLAT. The main determinants of resistance selection during pregnancy were the characteristics of the antiretroviral regimen chosen to prevent MTCT.

Virtually all women receiving dual therapy developed the M184V mutation. This mutation confers high-level resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine[25, 26] and is associated with an increased risk of virological failure of treatment combinations including these drugs.[18] Thymidine analogue resistance mutations (TAMs) were detected in few women but were also more frequent in those receiving dual therapy. A high proportion of women receiving triple-drug therapy also selected resistance mutations during pregnancy. Based on allele-specific PCR testing, 50% of women treated with three drugs developed the M184V mutation. Moreover, although few women received nevirapine in this study, almost 40% of these women had non-nucleoside analogue (NNRTI) resistance mutations detected at the postpartum visit. On the contrary, selection of PI resistance was rare in women treated with nelfinavir.

Use of dual therapy and duration of zidovudine exposure, which reflects the overall duration of antiretroviral therapy, were the only two variables that were independently associated with an increased risk of M184V detection after delivery. Similarly, the post-partum detection of the K103N mutation was independently associated with exposure to nevirapine and duration of exposure to zidovudine and lamivudine. These findings strongly argue against using dual therapy to prevent MTCT whenever triple therapy is available.

The fact that resistance mutations were so frequently detected among women receiving triple therapy contrasts with previous estimates from Latin America and Caribbean countries,[27] and suggests that PLAT was less effective than expected at continuously suppressing HIV-1 RNA levels. In the univariate risk factor analysis, women who had all HIV-1 RNA levels above 400 copies/mL during the study were 2.7 times more likely to have the M184V mutation detected postpartum than those remaining aviremic through delivery. Similarly, subjects receiving nelfinavir were 4 times less likely to develop postpartum M184V than those not receiving this drug. These findings suggest that women treated with drugs with high genetic barrier to attain resistance are less likely to develop the M184V mutation. None of these variables, however, remained independently associated with risk of postpartum resistance in the multivariate analyses.

The pre-existence of primary resistance mutations could also have explained the high frequency of postpartum resistance found in this study. The prevalence of primary resistance increased during the last decade in pregnant women in the US.[28] Using allele-specific PCR in women enrolled in WITS with similar characteristics to those included in this study, we previously reported a 9.4% prevalence of primary lamivudine and emtricitabine resistance, and a 6.3% prevalence of nelfinavir resistance between 1998 and 2004.[8] As most women included in this analysis started antiretroviral therapy before WITS enrolment, pre-treatment resistance data was only available from one third of women. Based on this limited number of subjects, we did not observe an association between pre-existing resistance and the postpartum selection of M184V or K103N.

We did not evaluate treatment adherence; therefore we cannot rule out an association between suboptimal adherence and the observed rates of postpartum resistance. Ethnicity and hard drug or alcohol consumption have been previously associated with lower adherence to antiretroviral therapy and worse virological outcomes,[29-31] however, these factors were not associated with postpartum resistance in this study.

Finally, altered drug pharmacokinetics due to physiological changes occurring in women during pregnancy could have favored the existence of suboptimal drug levels during pregnancy or prolonged drug elimination in the postpartum period. Exposure to most PIs, including nelfinavir, is reduced in HIV-1-infected women during pregnancy due to increased intestinal and/or hepatic CYP3A activity. [32-36] Pregnant women, as well, have increased nevirapine clearance and lower plasma concentrations than non-pregnant women, although plasma levels are largely influenced by body weight [37]. Chaix et al[38] found that selection of nevirapine-resistance strongly correlated with higher median nevirapine plasma concentration. Prolonged nevirapine elimination after delivery in subjects with higher plasma levels could have allowed viral replication in the presence of suboptimal nevirapine levels after delivery.

In concordance with previous studies,[8, 17, 39] allele-specific PCR increased the frequency of detection of key resistance mutations relative to population sequencing of plasma viruses. Several studies have shown that pre-treatment detection of minority NNRTI-resistant variants more than triples the risk of virological failure to subsequent NNRTI-based therapy.[17, 40] Therefore, the results of this study have important clinical implications for women receiving PLAT during pregnancy. It is well established that women selecting lamivudine, emtricitabine or NNRTI-resistant mutants during PLAT are at a higher risk of failing subsequent NNRTI-based antiretroviral therapy, particularly if treatment is started within 6 to 12 months after delivery.[18, 19]

Whereas ASPCR is several orders of magnitude more sensitive than viral population sequencing, it has a number of limitations that currently prevent its routine clinical application, i.e.: a) ASPCR interrogates only one codon per experiment; b) proportion measurements might be biased in the presence of polymorphisms at primer sites, and c) minority variant cut-offs that predict antiretroviral therapy outcomes with high sensitivity an specificity have not been established.

In spite of the limited numbers in some of the categories assessed and the limited pre-treatment resistance data available, our findings suggest that triple-drug therapy should be the preferred MTCT prevention approach to preserve future treatment options for mothers. When possible, antiretroviral regimens to prevent MTCT should include drugs with high genetic barrier. Nelfinavir-based therapy is no longer a preferred regimen for MTCT,[41] but the findings of this study likely apply to other PIs.[27] In women treated with nevirapine-based regimens the optimal timing of nevirapine interruption and length of continuation of other concomitant agents merits further inquiry to avoid active viral replication in the presence of suboptimal nevirapine levels. All efforts should be undertaken to ensure optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy. Lastly, given that resistance mutations selected during pregnancy will wane after PLAT interruption, performing postpartum genotypic resistance testing within 1 to 2 months after delivery would be highly informative for designing future treatment regimens for women exposed to PLAT and may be useful in guiding the choice of antiretroviral regimen postpartum.


This work was supported in part by the following U.S. Public Health Service grants from the National Institutes of Health: K24 RR16482, a Virology Support Laboratory contract from the Adult ACTG (U01 AI-38858), and the Harvard Medical School Center for AIDS Research Virology Core (P30 AI60354). Roger Paredes is a recipient of the “La Caixa” Fellowship Grant for Post-Graduate Studies, Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. The Women and Infants Transmission Study Principal investigators, study coordinators, program officers and funding include: Clemente Diaz, Edna Pacheco-Acosta (University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR; U01 AI 034858); Ruth Tuomala, Ellen Cooper, Donna Mesthene (Boston/Worcester Site, Boston, MA; 9U01 DA 015054); Phil LaRussa, Alice Higgins (Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY; U01 DA 015053); Sheldon Landesman, Herman Mendez, Ava Dennie (State University of New York, Brooklyn, NY; U01 HD 036117); Kenneth Rich, Delmyra Turpin (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; U01 AI 034841); William Shearer, Norma Cooper (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; U01 HD 041983); Joana Rosario (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD); Kevin Ryan, (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD); Vincent Smeriglio, Katherine Davenny (National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD); and Bruce Thompson (Clinical Trials & Surveys Corp., Baltimore, MD, N01 AI 085339). The scientific leadership core include: Kenneth Rich (PI), Delmyra Turpin (Study Coordinator) (1 U01 AI 050274-01). Additional support was provided by local Clinical Research Centers as follows: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston,TX; NIH GCRC RR000188; Columbia University, New York, NY; NIH GCRC RR000645.

This work was partially presented at the 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, MA, 2008.


1. Townsend CL, Cortina-Borja M, Peckham CS, de Ruiter A, Lyall H, Tookey PA. Low rates of mother-to-child transmission of HIV following effective pregnancy interventions in the United Kingdom and Ireland, 2000-2006. Aids. 2008;22:973–981. [PubMed]
2. Horvath T, Madi BC, Iuppa IM, Kennedy GE, Rutherford G, Read JS. Interventions for preventing late postnatal mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD006734. [PubMed]
3. Suksomboon N, Poolsup N, Ket-Aim S. Systematic review of the efficacy of antiretroviral therapies for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:293–311. [PubMed]
4. Volmink J, Siegfried NL, van der Merwe L, Brocklehurst P. Antiretrovirals for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:CD003510. [PubMed]
5. Read JS, Newell MK. Efficacy and safety of cesarean delivery for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD005479. [PubMed]
6. Guay LA, Musoke P, Fleming T, Bagenda D, Allen M, Nakabiito C, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:795–802. [PubMed]
7. Arrive E, Newell ML, Ekouevi DK, Chaix ML, Thiebaut R, Masquelier B, et al. Prevalence of resistance to nevirapine in mothers and children after single-dose exposure to prevent vertical transmission of HIV-1: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:1009–1021. [PubMed]
8. Paredes R, Cheng I, Kuritzkes DR, Tuomala RE. High prevalence of primary lamivudine and nelfinavir resistance in HIV-1-infected pregnant women in the United States, 1998-2004. AIDS. 2007;21:2103–2106. [PubMed]
9. Shah SS, Crane M, Monaghan K, McGowan JP. Genotypic resistance testing in HIV-infected pregnant women in an urban setting. Int J STD AIDS. 2004;15:384–387. [PubMed]
10. Henry M, Thuret I, Solas C, Genot S, Colson P, Tamalet C. Vertical transmission of multidrug-resistant Q151M human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strains. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:278–280. [PubMed]
11. Martinson NA, Morris L, Gray G, Moodley D, Pillay V, Cohen S, et al. Selection and persistence of viral resistance in HIV-infected children after exposure to single-dose nevirapine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44:148–153. [PubMed]
12. Lee EJ, Kantor R, Zijenah L, Sheldon W, Emel L, Mateta P, et al. Breast-milk shedding of drug-resistant HIV-1 subtype C in women exposed to single-dose nevirapine. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1260–1264. [PubMed]
13. Johnson VA, Petropoulos CJ, Woods CR, Hazelwood JD, Parkin NT, Hamilton CD, Fiscus SA. Vertical transmission of multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and continued evolution of drug resistance in an HIV-1-infected infant. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:1688–1693. [PubMed]
14. Eshleman SH, Mracna M, Guay LA, Deseyve M, Cunningham S, Mirochnick M, et al. Selection and fading of resistance mutations in women and infants receiving nevirapine to prevent HIV-1 vertical transmission (HIVNET 012) Aids. 2001;15:1951–1957. [PubMed]
15. Siegrist CA, Yerly S, Kaiser L, Wyler CA, Perrin L. Mother to child transmission of zidovudine-resistant HIV-1. Lancet. 1994;344:1771–1772. [PubMed]
16. Jourdain G, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Le Coeur S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Kantipong P, Leechanachai P, et al. Intrapartum exposure to nevirapine and subsequent maternal responses to nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:229–240. [PubMed]
17. Paredes R, Lalama C, Ribaudo H, Schackman B, Shikuma C, Meyer W, et al. Presence of Minor Populations of Y181C Mutants Detected by Allele-Specific PCR (ASPCR) and Risk of Efavirenz Failure in Treatment-Naïve Patients: Results of an ACTG 5095 Case-Cohort Study; 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Boston. 2008.
18. Coffie PA, Ekouevi DK, Chaix ML, Tonwe-Gold B, Clarisse AB, Becquet R, et al. Maternal 12-month response to antiretroviral therapy following prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV type 1, Ivory Coast, 2003-2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:611–621. [PubMed]
19. Lockman S, Shapiro RL, Smeaton LM, Wester C, Thior I, Stevens L, et al. Response to antiretroviral therapy after a single, peripartum dose of nevirapine. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:135–147. [PubMed]
20. Sheon AR, Fox HE, Rich KC, Stratton P, Diaz C, Tuomala R, et al. The women and infants transmission study (WITS) of maternal-infant HIV transmission: study design, methods and baseline data. J Womens Health. 1996;5:69–78.
21. Johnson VA, Brun-Vezinet F, Clotet B, Gunthard HF, Kuritzkes DR, Pillay D, et al. Update of the Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1: Spring 2008. Top HIV Med. 2008;16:62–68. [PubMed]
22. Paredes R, Marconi VC, Campbell TB, Kuritzkes DR. Systematic evaluation of allele-specific real-time PCR for the detection of minor HIV-1 variants with pol and env resistance mutations. J Virol Methods. 2007;146:136–146. [PubMed]
23. Lin HJ, Tanwandee T, Hollinger FB. Improved methods for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA and hepatitis C virus RNA in blood using spin column technology and chemiluminescent assays of PCR products. J Med Virol. 1997;51:56–63. [PubMed]
24. Paredes R, Marconi VC, Campbell TB, Kuritzkes DR. Systematic evaluation of allele-specific real-time PCR for the detection of minor HIV-1 variants with pol and env resistance mutations. J Virol Methods. 2007 [PubMed]
25. Wainberg MA, S H, Gu Z, Montaner JS, Cooley TP, McCaffrey R, Ruedy J, Hirst HM, Cammack N, Cameron J, et al. Development of HIV-1 resistance to (−)2′-deoxy-3′-thiacytidine in patients with AIDS or advanced AIDS-related complex. AIDS. 1995;9:351–357. [PubMed]
26. Gao Q, Gu Z, Parniak MA, Cameron J, Cammack N, Boucher C, Wainberg MA. The same mutation that encodes low-level human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to 2′,3′-dideoxyinosine and 2′,3′-dideoxycytidine confers high-level resistance to the (−) enantiomer of 2′,3′-dideoxy-3′-thiacytidine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1390–1392. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Duran AS, Losso MH, Salomon H, Harris DR, Pampuro S, Soto-Ramirez LE, et al. Drug resistance among HIV-infected pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals for prophylaxis. Aids. 2007;21:199–205. [PubMed]
28. Welles SL, Bauer GR, LaRussa PS, Colgrove RC, Pitt J. Time trends for HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance among antiretroviral-experienced and naive pregnant women in New York City during 1991 to early 2001. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44:329–335. [PubMed]
29. Cohn SE, Umbleja T, Mrus J, Bardeguez AD, Andersen JW, Chesney MA. Prior illicit drug use and missed prenatal vitamins predict nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy: adherence analysis A5084. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008;22:29–40. [PubMed]
30. Mellins CA, Chu C, Malee K, Allison S, Smith R, Harris L, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral treatment among pregnant and postpartum HIV-infected women. AIDS Care. 2008:1–11. [PubMed]
31. Schackman BR, Ribaudo HJ, Krambrink A, Hughes V, Kuritzkes DR, Gulick RM. Racial differences in virologic failure associated with adherence and quality of life on efavirenz-containing regimens for initial HIV therapy: results of ACTG A5095. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:547–554. [PubMed]
32. Bryson YJ, Mirochnick M, Stek A, Mofenson LM, Connor J, Capparelli E, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of nelfinavir when used in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine in HIV-infected pregnant women: Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) Protocol 353. HIV Clin Trials. 2008;9:115–125. [PubMed]
33. Unadkat JD, Wara DW, Hughes MD, Mathias AA, Holland DT, Paul ME, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant women. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:783–786. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Nellen JF, Schillevoort I, Wit FW, Bergshoeff AS, Godfried MH, Boer K, et al. Nelfinavir plasma concentrations are low during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:736–740. [PubMed]
35. Mathias AA, Maggio-Price L, Lai Y, Gupta A, Unadkat JD. Changes in pharmacokinetics of anti-HIV protease inhibitors during pregnancy: the role of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;316:1202–1209. [PubMed]
36. Stek AM, Mirochnick M, Capparelli E, Best BM, Hu C, Burchett SK, et al. Reduced lopinavir exposure during pregnancy. Aids. 2006;20:1931–1939. [PubMed]
37. von Hentig N, Carlebach A, Gute P, Knecht G, Klauke S, Rohrbacher M, et al. A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in men, nonpregnant women and women in late pregnancy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62:552–559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Chaix ML, Ekouevi DK, Peytavin G, Rouet F, Tonwe-Gold B, Viho I, et al. Impact of nevirapine (NVP) plasma concentration on selection of resistant virus in mothers who received single-dose NVP to prevent perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission and persistence of resistant virus in their infected children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:896–901. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Metzner KJ, Rauch P, Walter H, Boesecke C, Zollner B, Jessen H, et al. Detection of minor populations of drug-resistant HIV-1 in acute seroconverters. Aids. 2005;19:1819–1825. [PubMed]
40. Simen BB, Huppler Hullsiek K, Novak RM, MacArthur RD, Baxter JD, Huang C, et al. 16th International HIV Drug Resistance Workshop. Barbados, West Indies: Jun 12-16, 2007. Prevalence of Low Abundance Drug Resistant Variants by Ultra-Deep Sequencing in Chronically HIV-Infected Antiretroviral (ARV) Naive Patients and the Impact on Virologic Outcomes. 2007.
41. Perinatal HIV Guidelines Working Group Public Health Service Task Force Recommendations for Use of Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant HIV-Infected Women for Maternal Health and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States. 2007 November 2;:1–96. Available at Accessed: July 28th, 2008. [PubMed]