Here, we report that the magnitudes of AIH-induced phrenic and XII burst amplitude LTF (i.e. pLTF and XII LTF, respectively), as well as frequency LTF, differ among inbred rat strains, suggesting genetic or epigenetic differences in the regulation of respiratory plasticity. We further report that strain differences in pLTF are associated with differential expression of key molecules implicated in the mechanisms of pLTF (
Fuller et al., 2001a;
Baker-Herman and Mitchell, 2002;
Baker-Herman et al., 2004). The most consistent relationships observed were between 5-HT
2A receptor mRNA and protein levels in the ventral cervical spinal cord with pLTF. Thus, the strongest molecular candidate underlying pLTF strain differences is differential 5-HT
2A receptor gene expression.
The strains chosen for this study are frequently used as models for important physiological principles. For example, F344 rats are frequently studied as a model of aging, including aging effects on respiratory plasticity (
Zabka et al., 2001;
Behan et al., 2003). Lewis rats are frequently studied as a model of functional recovery following spinal cord injury (
Golder et al., 2005), and BN rats are the designated strain for the rat genome project (
Gibbs et al., 2004). In addition to their importance as physiological models, BN, F344 and Lewis rats exhibit similar increases in phrenic and XII burst amplitude during hypoxia, although BN and F344 rats differ in the burst frequency response to hypoxia (
Golder et al., 2005a). While increased inspiratory activity during hypoxia is not necessary for LTF (
Baker et al., 2001; Bocchario and Feldman, 2004;
Tadjalli et al., 2007), an association has been found between peak phrenic responses during hypoxia and the magnitude of the subsequent pLTF. Despite similarities in the hypoxic amplitude response, pLTF and XII LTF differed considerably among rat strains (pLTF: Lewis > F344 > BN; XII LTF: F344 ~ Lewis > BN). Overall, Lewis rats tended to have greater capacity for amplitude LTF, with BN exhibiting the lowest amplitude LTF. XII LTF was not significant in BN rats despite a large sample size (23), a finding consistent with our previous report (
Wilkerson and Mitchell, 2009). On the other hand, the lack of significant pLTF in BN rats (relative to time controls) may appear to be inconsistent with other recent findings (
Wilkerson and Mitchell, 2009). However, the small post-AIH changes in phrenic motor output in BN rats were similar here (20% baseline) versus our earlier study (
Wilkerson and Mitchell, 2009; 19% baseline), but time-dependent drift in phrenic nerve activity was greater in the present study (14%
versus 8% baseline). Thus, any AIH-induced changes may have been obscured by greater time-dependent drift in the present study.
LTF of respiratory-related burst amplitude may result from intermittent serotonin receptor activation on or near respiratory motor neurons (
Mitchell et al., 2001b;
Fuller et al., 2001a;
Baker-Herman and Mitchell, 2002), a concept consistent with our recent report that intermittent spinal serotonin receptor activation is sufficient to induce long-lasting phrenic motor facilitation (
MacFarlane and Mitchell, 2009). pLTF is frequently used as a model to study cellular mechanisms of amplitude LTF and, thus, was the focus of our analysis. We hypothesize that 5-HT
2 receptor activation in or near phrenic motor neurons initiates new BDNF synthesis and subsequent TrkB receptor activation, thereby giving rise to pLTF (
Baker-Herman et al., 2004). In contrast, the role of 5-HT
7 receptor activation in AIH-induced pLTF is more complex. Cervical spinal 5-HT
7 receptor activation is sufficient to elicit long-lasting phrenic motor facilitation in Sprague Dawley rats (
Hoffman and Mitchell, 2008a), but 5-HT
7 receptor activation during AIH constrains (versus contributes to) pLTF
via cross-talk inhibition (Hoffman and Mitchell, unpublished observations). Indeed, cervical spinal 5-HT
7 receptor inhibition increases AIH-induced pLTF by approximately 100% (Hoffman and Mitchell, unpublished observations). Although mechanisms of 5-HT
7 receptor-dependent pLTF constraint remains unclear, our working model is that 5-HT
7-induced PKA activation attenuates 5-HT
2A-dependent NADPH oxidase activity and ROS formation, thereby constraining pLTF (
Hoffman and Mitchell, 2008b;
Hoffman et al., 2009;
MacFarlane and Mitchell, 2009). Thus, differential 5-HT
2A and 5-HT
7 receptor expression may contribute to differential pLTF expression in BN vs. Lewis and F344 rats. In specific, lower 5-HT
2A (less facilitation) and greater 5-HT
7 receptor expression (more cross-talk inhibition) may both contribute to reduced pLTF levels.
More complex relationships between ventral cervical BDNF and TrkB mRNA and pLTF exist, since BN rats have the lowest pLTF but higher BDNF and TrkB mRNA expression levels (versus F344 rats). In contrast, Lewis rats exhibit greater pLTF versus F344 rats, yet have higher BDNF mRNA levels. The finding that BDNF mRNA is greatest in the highest (Lewis) and lowest (BN) pLTF-expressing strains demonstrates that there is no simple relationship between BDNF mRNA and the capacity for pLTF. Similarly, there is no simple relationship between pLTF and TrkB mRNA expression.
Strain differences were also observed in burst frequency LTF. Frequency LTF most likely arises from mechanisms operating at the level of brainstem respiratory rhythm generating neurons (
Powell et al., 1998;
Blitz and Ramirez, 2002;
Baker-Herman and Mitchell, 2008). The mechanisms underlying frequency LTF are poorly understood. Similar to pLTF and XII LTF, serotonin receptor inhibition blocks frequency LTF (
Bach and Mitchell, 1996). However, systemic serotonin receptor antagonists tend to alter baseline burst frequency, and a recent meta-analysis suggests that baseline burst frequency influences subsequent frequency LTF magnitude (
Baker-Herman and Mitchell, 2008). Thus, the apparent requirement of frequency LTF for serotonin receptor activation may reflect indirect drug effects on baseline burst frequency (
Baker-Herman and Mitchell, 2008). More detailed analyses of mechanisms giving rise to frequency LTF are warranted to understand differences among rat strains.
In addition to respiratory plasticity, strain differences were observed in baseline physiological variables, such as baseline burst frequency, CO
2 apneic/recruitment threshold and mean arterial pressure. While these differences may have been the result of differential reactions to anesthesia, it also remains possible that genetic differences in key modulatory/signaling pathways give rise to variations in physiological set-points among inbred rat strains. For example, 5-HT receptor activation in brainstem regions responsible for generating respiratory rhythm influences respiratory-related burst frequency (
Peña and Ramirez, 2002;
Schwarzacher et al., 2002;
Viemari and Tryba, 2009); thus, it is possible that differential 5-HT
2 receptor levels in respiratory rhythm generating neurons underlie differential baseline burst frequencies in F344
versus BN or Lewis rats.
Taken together, our data suggest that genetic (or epigenetic) factors influence the capacity for respiratory plasticity in phrenic motor output
via alterations in constitutive expression of key proteins in the mechanism of pLTF, particularly the expression of serotonin receptors. While we cannot completely rule out different rearing practices as the source of strain differences, we minimized this impact by obtaining most rats from the Harlan Indianapolis facility (with the exception of a group of F344 rats from the NIH-NIA Aged Colony). Nevertheless, our data are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that variations in serotonergic function gives rise to differences in pLTF expression. Increased serotonin terminal density (
Kinkead et al., 1998) and increased ventral spinal BDNF protein expression (
Johnson et al., 2000) following chronic cervical sensory denervation are associated with enhanced pLTF (
Kinkead et al., 1998). Similarly, chronic intermittent hypoxia (days) gives rise to enhanced LTF following AIH (
Ling et al., 2001;
Zabka et al., 2003;
McGuire et al., 2003,
2004;
Wilkerson and Mitchell, 2009), an effect that may reflect increased expression of a novel 5-HT receptor subtype (
Ling et al., 2001;
McGuire et al., 2004) and/or BDNF (
Wilkerson and Mitchell, 2009). Lastly, cervical spinal hemisection is associated with 5-HT
2A receptor upregulation (
Fuller et al., 2005), an effect that correlates with strengthened crossed spinal synaptic pathways to phrenic motor neurons (
Zhou and Goshgarian, 2000). Molecular events that underlie such “meta-plasticity” may also contribute to strain differences in pLTF.
Our data highlight the importance of strain selection in studies of pLTF, or any other form of respiratory plasticity. For example, F344 rats would be a useful model for investigations concerning signal transduction mechanisms underlying pLTF since this strain exhibits robust pLTF and high mean arterial pressures. By contrast, the small pLTF in BN rats may represent a useful model for studies of meta-plasticity (
Wilkerson and Mitchell, 2009;
Ling et al., 2001;
Zabka et al., 2003). In some respects, BN rats may be an appropriate model for human respiratory plasticity since humans normally express limited capacity for ventilatory LTF (
Babcock & Badr, 1998;
Harris et al., 2006;
Pierchala et al., 2008), but express robust LTF in sleep apnea patients (
Lee et al., 2009).
In summary, inbred rat strains differ in their capacity for AIH-induced respiratory plasticity. Although differences were noted in several manifestations of LTF (pLTF, XII LTF and frequency LTF), we focused on pLTF in this report because more is known regarding the cellular mechanism underlying pLTF. Lewis rats exhibit the greatest pLTF magnitude, whereas F344 rats are intermediate and BN rats exhibit little or no pLTF. Differential pLTF expression is associated with variations in key molecules underlying pLTF, particularly differential expression of serotonin receptors (5-HT2A and/or 5-HT7). We conclude that differences in serotonergic function may account, at least in part, for differences in the capacity for AIH-induced respiratory plasticity among rat strains.