Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Alzheimers Dis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 19.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2842455

Rs5848 variant influences GRN mRNA levels in brain and peripheral mononuclear cells in patients with Alzheimer's disease


Mutations in the progranulin gene (GRN) are causative for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration with ubiquitin-immunoreactive neuronal inclusions (FTLD-U). However, additional studies have demonstrated that these variants could be associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The influence of GRN genetic variability on susceptibility to AD and on expression levels in a series of neuropathologically-confirmed AD patients as well as in Peripheral Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) and in cells isolated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was investigated. An association study of rs9897526 and rs5848 was carried out in an Italian population and in a replication population of European American patients and controls.

None of the variants tested act as unequivocal susceptibility factor in both populations although a tendency to an increased frequency of rs5848T allele was observed in the Italian group of AD patients. Furthermore, rs9897526 anticipated the onset of the disease in the Italian population. GRN expression in the parietal lobe of AD cases showed a 0.76-fold decrease compared with controls (1.31±0.07 versus 1.73±0.12, P=0.0025). Patients carrying the rs5848 TT genotype had the lowest GRN expression levels (0.96±0.12, P=0.014). Despite no significant differences were found in the relative PBMC and CSF GRN expression in patients compared to controls, stratifying patients according to the presence of rs5848 T allele, a 0.57-fold decrease in GRN mRNA levels over C carriers was found in PBMC (1.22±0.23 versus 0.70±0.12, P=0.04). Similarly to data obtained in brain samples, patients carrying the TT genotype showed the lowest GRN mRNA levels (TT= 0.46±0.14, CC=1.22±0.23; P=0.013). These data argue against a direct role of GRN as a susceptibility factor for sporadic AD but support a role of GRN as a disease-modifying gene, possibly contributing to the failure of neuronal survival.

Keywords: Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Progranulin (GRN), Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP), Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF), Peripheral Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)


Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of primary degenerative dementia with a complex etiology and a strong genetic component affecting approximately 15 million people worldwide [1].

The only well-confirmed genetic risk factor for sporadic AD is the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene. Many other functional candidate genes coding for molecules involved in the pathogenic pathway of AD were proposed. Among these, Progranulin (GRN) could be considered a strong biological candidate gene as it has attracted significant attention in the scientific community following the recent discoveries of mutations causative for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration with ubiquitin-immunoreactive neuronal inclusions (FTLD-U) [2, 3]. A number of pathogenic GRN variants are predicted to result in a premature termination codon, leading to the degradation of the mutant mRNA through the process of nonsense mediated decay, resulting in a null allele [2].

GRN is a multifunctional secreted growth factor encoded by GRN gene on chromosome 17q21. GRN encodes for a 593 amino acid glycoprotein containing 7.5 tandem repeats of 12 cysteinyl granulin motifs. Progranulin and the various granulin peptides derived by elastase cleavage are implicated in a range of biological functions [4]. Progranulin is widely expressed in several tissues and has been implicated in development, wound repair, inflammation and tumorigenesis [5]. It is highly expressed in neurons of the cerebral cortex, the hippocampus and the cerebellum but its role in the Central Nervous System (CNS) has not been investigated extensively [6].

Interestingly, GRN expression has been found increased in activated microglia as well as in peripheral blood in AD suggesting a potential role in this pathology [2, 7]. Furthermore, several patients carrying mutations in GRN exhibited a clinical presentation indistinguishable from AD [8]. Recently the same Authors investigated the genetic variability within the GRN locus in a Belgian population of AD patients and found GRN haplotypes associated with increased risk for AD [9].

Furthermore, Cortini et al. [10] reported a novel putative GRN mutation leading to an amino acidic substitution in an Italian patient with clinical AD.

In the present study, GRN mutation scanning was performed in a cohort of Italian patients and an association analysis was performed for two frequent variants, rs9897526 G>A and rs5848 C>T, to test whether GRN genetic variability contribute to the susceptibility for AD in the Italian population. Results were confirmed in a second replication population.

In addition, a wide transcriptional analysis was carried out in the parietal lobe of 68 neuropathologically-confirmed AD cases and 43 controls as well as in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) and in cells isolated from Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF), to investigate the expression profile of GRN and the possible influence of the common variants considered on mRNA levels.

Subjects and Methods


Two set of samples were included in this study. The first series consisted of three hundred and fifty five patients with AD consecutively recruited at the Alzheimer Units of Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (Milan) and Ospedale L. Sacco (Milan). All patients underwent a standard battery of examinations, including medical history, physical and neurological examination, screening laboratory tests, neurocognitive evaluation, brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT) and, if indicated, Positron Emission Computed Tomography (PET). Dementia severity was assessed by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and the Mini Mental Scale Examination (MMSE). Disease duration was defined as the time in years between the first symptoms (by history) and the clinical diagnosis. The presence of significant vascular brain damage was excluded (Hachinski Ischemic Score <4). The diagnosis of probable AD was made by exclusion according to NINCDS-ADRDA criteria [11]. Fifty AD patients had an early onset of disease (EOAD; <65 years) whereas remainders had a late onset (LOAD; ≥65 years). The control group (CON) consisted of 377 subjects matched for ethnic background, age and gender without memory impairment (MMSE>28) and psychobehavioural complaints. The age of controls didn't significantly differ from that of patients (P>0.05). All patients or their caregivers gave informed consent for this study.

The second series consisted of an American set of samples collected through the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) at Washington University. Cases were diagnosed using the NINCS-ADRDA criteria, slightly modified to include AD as a diagnosis for individuals aged>90 years [11, 12]. A total of 355 unrelated AD cases were recruited for the study. DNA from 343 age and sex matched non-demented controls aged>60 years at assessment were obtained through the ADRC.

Sixty-eight out of 355 patients as well 43 out of 343 controls included in the American aeries, underwent neuropathological analysis, which confirmed the clinical diagnosis. Transcriptional analysis was carried out from RNA extracted by the parietal lobe of these individuals. All subjects included in the replication population were European Americans. All patients or their caregivers gave informed consent for this study. Information about cases and controls are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
Characteristics of patients and controls for both populations.

DNA isolation and ApoE genotyping

High-molecular weight DNA was isolated from whole blood using a Flexigene Kit (Qiagen, Hildren, Gemany), as described by the manufacturer. For the Italian sample DNA was amplified using specific primers and then digested with HhaI, as previously described [13]. For the U.S. sample APOE genotyping was performed using a Taqman assay (purchased from Applied Biosystems, ABI).

Direct Sequencing

The entire open reading frame with the exon-intron boundaries of GRN was sequenced in a subgroup of 50 patients with AD as well as in 50 age-matched controls using specific primers, as previously described [14]. Briefly, each PCR was carried out in 50 μl total volume containing 25 ng genomic DNA, 12.5 pmol of each specific primers, 0.6 μM of each dATP, dTTP, dCTP and dGTP, 1U Taq DNA polymerase (ABI). Amplification conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 38 cycles of 94 °C for 30 sec, Tm for 30 sec and 72 °C for 45 sec, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 mins.

Fragments were purified using the ExoSAP-IT® Kit (usb, USA), according to instructions of the manufacturer, and then direct sequencing was performed with an ABI PRISM®3100 gene analyzer (ABI). Sequencing PCR was carried out in 20 μl total volume containing 1 μl BigDye Terminator v3.1 (ABI), 1.6 pmol of each primer and water to reach the final volume. Thermocycling consisted of 25 cycles of 96 °C for 30 sec, 50 for 20 sec and 60 °C 3 mins. Sequences were analyzed with the Seqscape software.

Genotyping assays

Allelic variants with a frequency>10% were tested for association in the Italian series were analyzed by using TaqMan methodology. Each Taqman 5′-nuclease assay employed 25 ng of genomic DNA as template. Assay-on-demand products, ABI assay IDs: C_2548248_10, C_7452046_20, were used for rs9897526 and rs5848 genotyping respectively. Probes specific for these variants were labelled with 6-FAM and VIC as reporter dyes and MGB-NFQ (ABI) as quencher. All the assays were performed in 20 μl reactions in 96-well plates using an ABI PRISM ®7000 instrument (ABI) as previously described [15].

Genotyping for rs5848 in the U.S. series was performed using matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-light (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Sequenom). PCR primers and primer extension assays were designed by using SPECTROGEN software (Sequenom). SNP assays were designed to generate extension products of different masses resulting in genotype dependent peak appearance [16]. Genotyping for rs9897526 in the U.S. series was done using TaqMan as described above.

RNA Isolation and expression analysis

Total RNA from the parietal lobe of 68 neuropathologically- confirmed AD cases and 43 controls from the US series was extracted using the Tissue Kit and RNeasy Lipid Tissue kit ( cDNA was obtained from total RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Archive Kit.

Total RNA from PBMC was obtained from 26 patients (17 females, mean age: 73.42±1.93 and 9 males, mean age 77.57±1.67) and 27 control subjects (16 females, mean age: 70.13±4.20 and 11 males, mean age: 69.29±3.20) from the Italian series carrying different genotypes.

Additionally, total RNA from cells isolated from CSF was available from 25 subjects of the Italian series: 17 patients (9 males, mean age 69.75±4.5 and 8 females, mean age: 75.5±3.50) and 8 control subjects (4 males, mean age 70.50±0.20 and 4 females, mean age 74.00±0.89).

RNA purity was measured by optical density and only samples with an OD 260/280 ratio of 1.8 to 2 and an OD 260/230 of 1.8 or greater were used. Then, to confirm the lack of gDNA a PCR was carried out using primers located in different consecutives exons of actin housekeeping gene. cDNA was detected by the presence of an amplicon of 250 bp, whereas gDNA, characterized by the presence of a 444 bp fragment, was absent. In addition, RNA integrity was confirmed by quantified cDNA levels for GAPDH (2 different assays, located in different regions of the gene), B2M and cyclophilin A.

GRN expression levels in parietal lobe were measured by using a custom TaqMan assay for GRN exon 12 (primers and probes available upon request) using GAPDH as endogenous control. Each real-time PCR run included within-plate duplicates and each experiment was performed twice for each sample. Correction for sample-to-sample variation was done by simultaneously amplifying GAPDH as a reference. Real-time data were analyzed using the comparative Ct method. The Ct values of each sample were normalized with the Ct value for the housekeeping gene, GAPDH and were corrected for the PCR efficiency of each assay, although the efficiency of all reactions was close to 100%. Only samples with an s.e. < 10% were analyzed.

Total RNA from PBMC was reverse-transcribed using the Ready to go kit (Usb, USA). Subsequently, the relative expression of GRN was measured by quantitative RT-PCR using premade TaqMan gene expression assays developed in the meantime (ABI, Assay ID: Hs00173570_m1). This custom-made assay underwent rigorous quality control testing, including mass spectrometry to verify the sequence, and further testing ensuring proper formulation of probe and primer mix. As an endogenous control for sample normalization, 18S rRNA was used (ABI, Assay ID: HS99999901_s1). The relative quantity of RNA was measured in duplicate by the ΔΔCT method relative to the data from a control subject [17].

Qualitative transcriptional analysis of rs9897526 has been performed through cDNA amplification of exons 2-7 by using specific primers (forward: 5′-GCCACTCCTGCATCTTTACC-3′; reverse: 5′- TTCTCCTTGGAGAGGCACTT-3′). Fragments (wild type length: 586 bp) were visualized by agarose gel-electrophoresis stained with ethidium bhromide.

Statistical analysis

Allelic and genotypic frequencies were obtained by direct counting. Haploview v4.1 software was used to test for Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE), Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) and for differences in allele distribution between cases and controls. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney Rank sum test was used for differences related to age at onset of disease in different genotype carriers. According to the Bonferroni's correction, the threshold for significance was set at P<0.025.

One way Anova test, including Holm-Sidak for multiple comparisons, was performed for differences related to mRNA levels.

In the neuropathological series, GRN mRNA levels were compared using the Kruskall-Wallis test. Stepwise discriminant analysis did not detect any important covariant (age, gender, APOE status).


Genetic analysis

Direct sequencing of GRN in 50 Italian AD samples didn't show any novel mutation but led to the identification of several known common variants previously reported (Table 2). Among these, rs9897526, which is located 21 bp downstream of the GRN intron 2 splice donor site and rs5848, located in the 3′UTR region, showed a minor allele frequency (MAF)> 10% and were subsequently tested for association with AD. Pairwaise LD analysis computed with Haploview software indicated no LD between rs9897526 and rs5848 (D′=0.40) thus no haplotype blocks and markers combinations were highlighted according to the definition by Gabriel et al. [18], as implemented in Haploview v4.1.

Table 2
PGRN allelic variants identified in Italian patients.

Both SNPs were in HWE in cases and controls for both datasets. A tendency to an increased frequency of rs5848T allele was found in patients as compared with controls although it hardly reaches the significant threshold required according to the Bonferroni's correction (rs5848 MAF: 34.5% versus 29.0% in patients as compared with controls, P=0.025). Allelic and genotype frequencies did not differ between patients and controls for rs9897526 (MAF: 14.4%versus 12.2% in patients as compared with controls, P≥0.05). Data were replicated in a second independent series from US (rs5848 MAF: 30.0% versus 27.9% in cases and controls respectively, rs9897526 MAF: 12.7% versus 14.1% in cases as compared with controls; P>0.05, Table 3).

Table 3
Allelic and genotype frequencies (%) in AD compared with age matched controls in the two study samples.

No association with APOE status or gender was found in both populations considering each SNP.

In the Italian series, cases carrying the rs9897526A variant had a significantly earlier age at disease onset compared with patients carrying the G allele (mean age 70.12±1.18, n= 71 versus 74.32±0.69, n=173 respectively, P=0.002) whereas no influence on age at onset has been found according to the rs5848 status.

Expression analysis

GRN expression in the parietal lobe of 68 neuropathologically-confirmed AD cases showed a 0.76-fold decrease as compared with controls (1.31±0.07 versus 1.73±0.12, P=0.0025, Figure 1A). Moreover, among cases, individuals carrying the TT genotype presented the lowest GRN expression levels (0.96±0.12, P=0.014, Figure 1B). On the contrary, the P-value for association of rs5848 with GRN expression in controls' brain was 0.922. The GRN mRNA mean level in controls carrying the rs5848 T allele was 1.62 and for rs5848C carriers was 1.63.

Figure 1Figure 1
A) GRN expression levels in parietal lobe from patients and controls B) association of rs5848 with GRN relative mRNA expression. Values are expressed as mean relative mRNA levels±S.E.M.

Despite no significant differences were found in the relative PBMC and CSF GRN expression in patients as compared with controls in the independent AD Italian series (data not shown), stratifying patients according to the presence of rs5848T allele, a statistically significant 0.57-fold decrease in GRN mRNA levels over C carriers was found in PBMC (0.70±0.12 versus 1.22±0.23, P=0.04, Figure 2). This effect was likely dose-dependent, as patients carrying the TT genotype showed the lowest GRN mRNA levels in PBMC, 0.38 fold decrease over CC carriers (TT= 0.46±0.14; CC=1.22±0.23, P=0.013, Figure 2). This tendency was not significant in controls (CC= 1.09±0.22 versus CT/TT= 0.84±0.16). Similarly, considering GRN expression levels in cells isolated from CSF, the same effect was observed although the significance threshold was not reached, probably due to the small sample size (data not shown). Conversely, real Time PCR showed no difference in the rate of mRNA levels in carriers of rs9897526 A compared with non-carriers (data not shown). In addition, qualitative agarose gel-electrophoresis of GRN PCR amplicons obtained from first-strand cDNA prepared from PBMC revealed no differences in the transcript length comparing subjects carrying different alleles (Fig. 3).

Figure 2
Association of rs5848 with GRN mRNA expression in PBMC from AD patients. Values are expressed as mean relative mRNA levels±S.E.M. One way Anova test, including Holm-Sidak for multiple comparisons was performed for differences related to the mRNA ...
Figure 3
Transcript analysis of rs9897526 variant. Agarose gel-electrophoresis of GRN amplicon obtained from PBMC cDNA from subjects carrying different genotypes: GG lane 2, GA lane 3, AA lane 4. The expected transcript length of GRN cDNA exon 2-7 (586 bp) does ...


According to our results, GRN rs9897526 and rs5848 or SNPs in high LD with these variants do not act as susceptibility factors for AD, but rs5848 polymorphism is consistently associated with decreased GRN mRNA levels in the parietal lobe of patients with AD. This effect was observed also in PBMC from patients.

The association study revealed no significant differences in the distribution of rs9897526 and rs5848 in cases and controls beneath a tendency towards an increased frequency of rs5848T allele was observed in the Italian AD population. Data were replicated in an independent American set of samples, thus arguing against a direct role of these common variants in susceptibility to AD. On the contrary, some recent findings suggested a role for rs5848 in the risk for FTLD-U, increasing the OR to develop FTLD-U for carriers homozygous for the minor T-allele up to 3 times [19]. The apparent negative association found in AD could be due to different pathogenic mechanisms underlying different neurodegenerative diseases, however the difference observed in rs5848 distribution in the Italian AD population suggests that further replication studies are required to drawn definitive conclusions.

Interestingly, GRN expression was decreased in the parietal lobe of AD subjects. A similar trend was found in cells from CSF in the independent Italian series, although the significance levels were not reached, possibly due to the small number of CSF samples studied. On the contrary, no significant differences were found in the relative PBMC GRN expression levels in patients as compared with controls. These results didn't confirm findings from Coppola et al. [7] who reported increased GRN expression levels in PBMC of patients affected from different neurodegenerative disorders, suggesting whole blood gene expression profile as a suitable surrogate for gene expression in the CNS. This discrepancy could be addressed to several reasons, firstly the large gene expression study from Coppola et al. [7] was performed using microarrays on PBMC without any further validation which is usually performed, since concerns regarding the reliability and comparability of microarray data have been raised so far [20, 21, 22]. Herein, the TaqMan technology, commonly used for validation and comparison of gene expression in microarray quality control studies [23, 24, 25] and considered the gold standard for gene expression measurement, was performed.

Moreover, whole blood gene expression profile, although sharing significant similarities with that of the CNS, could not be representative for all brain regions as evinced from the hierarchical clustering results for gene expression data from whole blood and several CSN tissue including the parietal lobe [26]. Recent evidence described clinical parietal lobe features in many cases of FTLD with a positive family history together with histopathologic evidence of significant parietal lobe involvement in association with GRN mutations [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. According to these data it is tempting to consider parietal lobe deficits as salient feature of the progranulin phenotype, thus an imbalance of GRN expression in parietal lobe of AD patients would be conceivable.

In the present study GRN expression in the parietal lobe of patients with AD was strongly influenced by the presence of rs5848T allele. A significant decrease of GRN mRNA levels was observed in AD cases carrying the polymorphic T allele as compared with non-carriers. Similar results were obtained in PBMC as well as in cells isolated from the CSF, although the small sample size did not allow to draw definitive conclusions. These data are in accordance with previous evidence suggesting that rs5848 is implicated in differential expression of GRN in a database-mining experiment [33]. Moreover, Rademakers et al. [19] supported the homozygosity of rs5848T allele as a major risk factor for FTLD-U through a decrease in levels of functional GRN. Haploinsufficiency was predicted by the authors to result from increased suppression of GRN translation through altered micro (mi)RNA regulation, since rs5848 resulted to be located within a predicted binding-site for the human specific miR-659, which would contribute to translational repression.

According to our results, rs5848 variant showed an influence on GRN mRNA levels. This effect could be due to different translational regulation mechanisms by miRNAs peculiar of AD pathology, which in the case of rs5848 could have the same effect in reducing GRN expression levels.

The reduction of available GRN could be related with neurodegeneration, as most GRN mutations resulting in a reduction of the GRN protein levels due to nonsense mediated mRNA decay and consequently reduced GRN levels are causative for neurodegenerative processes [2, 3].

Recently several missense mutations resulted associated, through different molecular mechanisms, to a significantly reduced secretion of the protein [34]. Thus, apparently all GRN mutations cause reduced protein expression levels or secretion [34, 35]. Furthermore Ghidoni et al. [36] analyzed GRN plasma and CSF levels in FTLD and demonstrated that GRN is strongly reduced both in plasma and CSF of affected and unaffected subjects carrying mutations in the gene, confirming the initial reports of low levels of GRN due to the effect of GRN mutations.

Although the exact effects of GRN in CNS remain to be established, emerging evidence support a role in the CNS as neurotrophic factor, possibly stabilizing neurons injured by deposited proteins such as beta-amyloid (Aβ) [34]. The observation that in AD GRN is up-regulated in activated microglia around amyloid plaques further support the hypothesis of a protective role towards a defence response to neuritic degeneration [2].

Lastly, a significant association between rs9897526 and disease onset was observed in the Italian series in term of a reduction of the age at onset in patients carrying the rs9897526A allele. Nevertheless, the association was not confirmed in the US series suggesting that other factors such environmental conditions could act synergistically with the individual genetic background in the contribution to the disease.

Interestingly, a number of previous findings suggested that rs9897526 influences the age at disease onset in different neurodegenerative diseases. In particular, Sleegers et al. [37] examined the contribution of eight frequent polymorphisms in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) risk in a Belgian and a Dutch population, finding three common variants in the same LD block, including rs9897526, significantly associated with a reduction of age at onset and a shorter survival after onset of ALS.

In addition, Rademakers et al. [38] demonstrated that patients with FTLD carrying the Arg493X mutation together with the rs9897526A allele on their wild type allele show a delayed mean age at onset of the disease. Despite the influence of rs9897526A allele on age at onset in this last study was opposite than our findings, Authors reported it was not possible to draw definitive conclusions because of the small sample size. However, the molecular mechanism at the basis of this effect is not clear yet, since rs9897526 is not located in the splice site region and doesn't seem to generate an aberrant transcript in RT-PCR; moreover stratifying patients according to the presence of rs9897526 A allele, no difference in the relative amount of mRNA has been found. Therefore, a possible hypothesis to be considered is that another true modifying variant should exist in LD with rs9897526.

In conclusion, these results suggest that GRN common variants rs5848 and rs9897526 could act as modifier factors, affecting GRN mRNA levels and possibly decreasing the age at disease onset, likely contributing to the failure of neuronal survival. However, more extensive functional analysis is needed to confirm this hypothesis.


This work was supported by grants from Associazione “Amici del Centro Dino Ferrari”, Monzino Foundation, IRCCS Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Italian Ministry of Health-Programma Strategico 2007 (conv. PS39), Associazione per la Ricerca sulle Demenze (ARD) and Ing. Cesare Cusan.


Conflict of Interest Statement: Authors do not have conflicts of interest, including financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this work.


1. Fratiglioni L, De Ronchi D, Agüero-Torres H. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of dementia. Drugs Aging. 1999;15:365–375. [PubMed]
2. Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, Gass J, Rademakers R, Lindholm C, Snowden J, Adamson J, Sadovnick AD, Rollinson S, Cannon A, Dwosh E, Neary D, Melquist S, Richardson A, Dickson D, Berger Z, Eriksen J, Robinson T, Zehr C, Dickey CA, Crook R, McGowan E, Mann D, Boeve B, Feldman H, Hutton M. Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature. 2006;442:916–919. [PubMed]
3. Cruts M, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, Engelborghs S, Wils H, Pirici D, Rademakers R, Vandenberghe R, Dermaut B, Martin JJ, van Duijn C, Peeters K, Sciot R, Santens P, De Pooter T, Mattheijssens M, Van den Broeck M, Cuijt I, Vennekens K, De Deyn PP, Kumar-Singh S, Van Broeckhoven C. Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature. 2006;442:920–924. [PubMed]
4. Zhu J, Nathan C, Jin W, Sim D, Ashcroft GS, Wahl SM, Lacomis L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Wright CD, Ding A. Conversion of proepithelin to epithelins: roles of SLPI and elastase in host defense and wound repair. Cell. 2002;111:867–878. [PubMed]
5. Ahmed Z, Mackenzie IR, Hutton ML, Dickson DW. Progranulin in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2007;4:7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Daniel R, He Z, Carmichael KP, Halper J, Bateman A. Cellular localization of gene expression for progranulin. J Histochem Cytochem. 2000;48:999–1009. [PubMed]
7. Coppola G, Karydas A, Rademakers R, Wang Q, Baker M, Hutton M, Miller BL, Geschwind DH. Gene expression study on peripheral blood identifies progranulin mutations. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:92–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Brouwers N, Nuytemans K, van der Zee J, Gijselinck I, Engelborghs S, Theuns J, Kumar-Singh S, Pickut BA, Pals P, Dermaut B, Bogaerts V, De Pooter T, Serneels S, Van den Broeck M, Cuijt I, Mattheijssens M, Peeters K, Sciot R, Martin JJ, Cras P, Santens P, Vandenberghe R, De Deyn PP, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C, Sleegers K. Alzheimer and Parkinson diagnoses in progranulin null mutation carriers in an extended founder family. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:1436–1446. [PubMed]
9. Brouwers N, Sleegers K, Engelborghs S, Maurer-Stroh S, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, Pickut BA, Van den Broeck M, Mattheijssens M, Peeters K, Schymkowitz J, Rousseau F, Martin JJ, Cruts M, De Deyn PP, Van Broeckhoven C. Genetic variability in progranulin contributes to risk for clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008;71:656–664. [PubMed]
10. Cortini F, Fenoglio C, Guidi I, Venturelli E, Pomati S, Marcone A, Scalabrini D, Villa C, Clerici F, Dalla Valle E, Mariani C, Cappa S, Bresolin N, Scarpini E, Galimberti D. Novel exon 1 progranulin gene variant in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15:1111–1117. [PubMed]
11. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–944. [PubMed]
12. Berg L, McKeel DW, Jr, Miller JP, Storandt M, Rubin EH, Morris JC, Baty J, Coats M, Norton J, Goate AM, Price JL, Gearing M, Mirra SS, Saunders AM. Clinicopathologic studies in cognitively healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: relation of histologic markers to dementia severity, age, sex, and apolipoprotein E genotype. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:326–335. [PubMed]
13. Del Bo R, Comi GP, Bresolin N, Castelli E, Conti E, Degiuli A, Ausenda CD, Scarlato G. The apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele causes a faster decline of cognitive performances in Down's syndrome subjects. J Neurol Sci. 1997;145:87–91. [PubMed]
14. Gass J, Cannon A, Mackenzie IR, Boeve B, Baker M, Adamson J, Crook R, Melquist S, Kuntz K, Petersen R, Josephs K, Pickering-Brown SM, Graff-Radford N, Uitti R, Dickson D, Wszolek Z, Gonzalez J, Beach TG, Bigio E, Johnson N, Weintraub S, Mesulam M, White CL, 3rd, Woodruff B, Caselli R, Hsiung GY, Feldman H, Knopman D, Hutton M, Rademakers R. Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2988–3001. [PubMed]
15. Fenoglio C, Galimberti D, Ban M, Maranian M, Scalabrini D, Venturelli E, Piccio L, De Riz M, Yeo TW, Goris A, Gray J, Bresolin N, Scarpini E, Compston A, Sawcer S. SELPLG and SELP single-nucleotide polymorphisms in multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2006;394:92–96. [PubMed]
16. Mukherjee O, Kauwe JS, Mayo K, Morris JC, Goate AM. Haplotype-based association analysis of the MAPT locus in late onset Alzheimer's disease. BMC Genet. 2007;8:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Methods. 2001;25:402–408. [PubMed]
18. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, Higgins J, DeFelice M, Lochner A, Faggart M, Liu-Cordero SN, Rotimi C, Adeyemo A, Cooper R, Ward R, Lander ES, Daly MJ, Altshuler D. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002;296(5576):2225–9. [PubMed]
19. Rademakers R, Eriksen JL, Baker M, Robinson T, Ahmed Z, Lincoln SJ, Finch N, Rutherford NJ, Crook RJ, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Parisi JE, Caselli RJ, Wszolek ZK, Uitti RJ, Feldman H, Hutton ML, Mackenzie IR, Graff-Radford NR, Dickson DW. Common variation in the miR-659 binding-site of GRN is a major risk factor for TDP43-positive frontotemporal dementia. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(23):3631–42. [PubMed]
20. Marshall E. Getting the noise out of gene arrays. Science. 2004;306(5696):630–1. [PubMed]
21. Ein-Dor L, Zuk O, Domany E. Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(15):5923–8. [PubMed]
22. Qin LX, Beyer RP, Hudson FN, Linford NJ, Morris DE, Kerr KF. Evaluation of methods for oligonucleotide array data via quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Arikawa E, Sun Y, Wang J, Zhou Q, Ning B, Dial SL, Guo L, Yang J. Cross-platform comparison of SYBR Green real-time PCR with TaqMan PCR, microarrays and other gene expression measurement technologies evaluated in the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) study. BMC Genomics. 2008;11:9–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Chen JJ, Hsueh HM, Delongchamp RR, Lin CJ, Tsai CA. Reproducibility of microarray data: a further analysis of microarray quality control (MAQC) data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:412. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Shi L, Jones WD, Jensen RV, Harris SC, Perkins RG, Goodsaid FM, Guo L, Croner LJ, Boysen C, Fang H, Qian F, Amur S, Bao W, Barbacioru CC, Bertholet V, Cao XM, Chu TM, Collins PJ, Fan XH, Frueh FW, Fuscoe JC, Guo X, Han J, Herman D, Hong H, Kawasaki ES, Li QZ, Luo Y, Ma Y, Mei N, Peterson RL, Puri RK, Shippy R, Su Z, Sun YA, Sun H, Thorn B, Turpaz Y, Wang C, Wang SJ, Warrington JA, Willey JC, Wu J, Xie Q, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhong S, Wolfinger RD, Tong W. The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9 9:S10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Sullivan PF, Fan C, Perou CM. Evaluating the comparability of gene expression in blood and brain. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2006;141B(3):261–8. [PubMed]
27. Rohrer JD, Warren JD, Omar R, Mead S, Beck J, Revesz T, Holton J, Stevens JM, Al-Sarraj S, Pickering-Brown SM, Hardy J, Fox NC, Collinge J, Warrington EK, Rossor MN. Parietal lobe deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by a mutation in the progranulin gene. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(4):506–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Mackenzie IR, Baker M, West G, Woulfe J, Qadi N, Gass J, Cannon A, Adamson J, Feldman H, Lindholm C, Melquist S, Pettman R, Sadovnick AD, Dwosh E, Whiteheart SW, Hutton M, Pickering-Brown SM. A family with tau-negative frontotemporal dementia and neuronal intranuclear inclusions linked to chromosome 17. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 4):853–67. [PubMed]
29. Lendon CL, Lynch T, Norton J, McKeel DW, Jr, Busfield F, Craddock N, Chakraverty S, Gopalakrishnan G, Shears SD, Grimmett W, Wilhelmsen KC, Hansen L, Morris JC, Goate AM. Hereditary dysphasic disinhibition dementia: a frontotemporal dementia linked to 17q21-22. Neurology. 1998;50(6):1546–55. [PubMed]
30. Mukherjee O, Pastor P, Cairns NJ, Chakraverty S, Kauwe JS, Shears S, Behrens MI, Budde J, Hinrichs AL, Norton J, Levitch D, Taylor-Reinwald L, Gitcho M, Tu PH, Tenenholz Grinberg L, Liscic RM, Armendariz J, Morris JC, Goate AM. HDDD2 is a familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions caused by a missense mutation in the signal peptide of progranulin. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(3):314–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Rosso SM, Kamphorst W, de Graaf B, Willemsen R, Ravid R, Niermeijer MF, Spillantini MG, Heutink P, van Swieten JC. Familial frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitin-positive inclusions is linked to chromosome 17q21-22. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 10):1948–57. [PubMed]
32. Snowden JS, Pickering-Brown SM, Mackenzie IR, Richardson AM, Varma A, Neary D, Mann DM. Progranulin gene mutations associated with frontotemporal dementia and progressive non-fluent aphasia. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 11):3091–102. [PubMed]
33. Ge B, Gurd S, Gaudin T, Dore C, Lepage P, Harmsen E, Hudson TJ, Pastinen T. Survey of allelic expression using EST mining. Genome Res. 2005;15:1584–1591. [PubMed]
34. Shankaran SS, Capell A, Hruscha AT, Fellerer K, Neumann M, Schmid B, Haass C. Missense mutations in the progranulin gene linked to frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions reduce progranulin production and secretion. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:1744–1753. [PubMed]
35. Van Damme P, Van Hoecke A, Lambrechts D, Vanacker P, Bogaert E, van Swieten J, Carmeliet P, Van Den Bosch L, Robberecht W. Progranulin functions as a neurotrophic factor to regulate neurite outgrowth and enhance neuronal survival. J Cell Biol. 2008;181:37–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Ghidoni R, Benussi L, Glionna M, Franzoni M, Binetti G. Low plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2008;71:1235–1239. [PubMed]
37. Sleegers K, Brouwers N, Maurer-Stroh S, van Es MA, Van Damme P, van Vught PW, van der Zee J, Serneels S, De Pooter T, Van den Broeck M, Cruts M, Schymkowitz J, De Jonghe P, Rousseau F, van den Berg LH, Robberecht W, Van Broeckhoven C. Progranulin genetic variability contributes to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2008;71:253–259. [PubMed]
38. Rademakers R, Baker M, Gass J, Adamson J, Huey ED, Momeni P, Spina S, Coppola G, Karydas AM, Stewart H, Johnson N, Hsiung GY, Kelley B, Kuntz K, Steinbart E, Wood EM, Yu CE, Josephs K, Sorenson E, Womack KB, Weintraub S, Pickering-Brown SM, Schofield PR, Brooks WS, Van Deerlin VM, Snowden J, Clark CM, Kertesz A, Boylan K, Ghetti B, Neary D, Schellenberg GD, Beach TG, Mesulam M, Mann D, Grafman J, Mackenzie IR, Feldman H, Bird T, Petersen R, Knopman D, Boeve B, Geschwind DH, Miller B, Wszolek Z, Lippa C, Bigio EH, Dickson D, Graff-Radford N, Hutton M. Phenotypic variability associated with progranulin haploinsufficiency in patients with the common 1477C-->T (Arg493X) mutation: an international initiative. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:857–868. [PubMed]