1. Darwin CR. London: Murray; 1859. On the origin of species. p. 432 p.
2. Ricklefs RE. Natural Selection and the Development of Mortality Rates in Young Birds. Nature. 1969;223:922–925. [PubMed] 3. Dawkins R, Krebs JR. Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 1979;205:489–511. [PubMed]
4. Endler JA. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. p. 321 p.
5. Reznick DN, Shaw FH, Rodd FH, Shaw RG. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science. 1997;275:1934–1937. [PubMed] 6. Losos JB, Schoener TW, Langerhans RB, Spiller DA. Rapid temporal reversal in predator-driven natural selection. Science. 2006;314:1111. [PubMed] 7. Svensson EI, Friberg M. Selective Predation on Wing Morphology in Sympatric Damselflies. Am Nat. 2007;170:101–112. [PubMed]
8. Errington PL. Predation and vertebrate populations. Q Rev Biol. 1946;21:144–177.
9. Curio E. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1976. The ethology of predation. p. 250 p.
10. Kenward RE. Hawks and Doves: Factors affecting success and selection in Goshawk attacks on Woodpigeons. J Anim Ecol. 1978;47:449–460.
11. Temple SA. Do predators always capture substandard individuals disproportionately from prey populations? Ecology. 1987;68:669–674.
12. Moller AP, Erritzoe J. Predation against birds with low immunocompetence. Oecologia. 2000;122:500–504.
13. Duffy MA, Hall SR, Tessier AJ, Huebner M. Selective predators and their parasitized prey: top-down control of epidemics. Limn Ocean. 2005;50:412–420.
14. Martín J, de Neve L, Polo V, Fargallo JA. Health-dependent vulnerability to predation affects escape responses of unguarded chinstrap penguin chicks. Behav Ecol Soc. 2006;60:778–784.
15. Carlson SM, Rich HB, Quinn TP. Does variation in selection imposed by bears drive divergence among populations in the size and shape of sockeye salmon? Evolution. 2009;63:1244–1261. [PubMed]
16. Penteriani V, Delgado M, Bartolommei P, Maggio C, Alonso-Alvarez C, et al. Owls and rabbits: predation against substandard individuals of an easy prey. J Avian Biol. 2008;39:215–221.
17. Shine R, LeMaster MP, Moore IT, Olsson MM, Mason RT. Bumpus in the snake den: effects of sex, size and body condition on mortality of red-sided garter snakes. Evolution. 2001;55:598–604. [PubMed] 18. Carlson SM, Hilborn R, Hendry AP, Quinn TP. Predation by Bears Drives Senescence in Natural Populations of Salmon. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Quinn TP, Hendry AE, Buck GB. Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evol Ecol Res. 2001;3:917–937.
20. Quinn TP, Kinnison MT. Size-selective and sex-selective predation by brown bears on sockeye salmon. Oecologia. 1999;121:273–282.
21. Feare CJ. Control of bird pest populations. In: Perrins CM, Lebreton J-D, Hirons GJM, editors. Bird population studies, relevance to conservation and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. pp. pp 463–478.
22. Vidal E, Medail F, Tatoni T. Is the yellow-legged gull a superabundant bird species in the Mediterranean? Impact on fauna and flora, conservation measures and research priorities. Biod Cons. 1998;7:1013–1026.
23. Blokpoel H, Spaans AL. Christchurch: New Zealand Ornithological Congress Trust Board; 1991. Superabundance in gulls: causes, problems and solutions. Acta XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici.
24. Hatch JJ. Threats to public health from gulls (Laridae). Int J Env Health Res. 1996;6:5–16.
25. Oro D, Martínez-Abraín A. Deconstructing myths on large gulls and their impact on threatened sympatric waterbirds. Anim Cons. 2007;10:117–126.
26. Bosch M, Oro D, Cantos FJ, Zabala M. Short-term effects of culling on the ecology and population dynamics of the yellow-legged gull. J Appl Ecol. 2000;37:369–385.
27. Sanz-Aguilar A, Massa B, Lo Valvo F, Oro D, Minguez E, et al. Contrasting age-specific recruitment and survival at different spatial scales: a case study with the European storm petrel. Ecography. 2009;32:637–646.
28. Finney SK, Harris MP, Keller LF, Elston DA, Monaghan P, et al. Reducing the density of breeding gulls influences the pattern of recruitment of immature Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica to a breeding colony. J Appl Ecol. 2003;40:545–552.
29. Lande R, Arnold SJ. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution. 1983;37:1210–1226.
30. Sinervo B, Svensson E. Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity. 2002;89:329–338. [PubMed] 31. Miller MW, Swanson HM, Wolfe LL, Quartarone FG, Huwer SL, et al. Lions and prions and Deer Demise. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e4019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Lima SL. Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions-determinants of body mass in birds. Ecology. 1986;67:377–385.
33. Houston AI, McNamara J, Hutchison JMC. General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993;341:375–397.
34. Gosler AG, Greenwood JJD, Perrins C. Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature. 1995;377:621–623.
35. MacLeod R, Barnett P, Clark J, Creswell W. Mass-dependent predation risk as a mechanism for house sparrow declines. Biol Let. 2006;2:43–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 36. MacLeod R, MacLeod CD, Learmonth JA, Jepson PD, Reid RJ, et al. Mass-dependent predation risk and lethal dolphin-porpoise interactions. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2007;274:2587–2593. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 37. Brodie ED, Moore AJ, Janzen FJ. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995;10:313–318. [PubMed]
38. Heitmeyer ME, Frederikson LH, Humburg DD. Further evidence of biases associated with hunter-killed mallards. J Wild Man. 1993;57:733–740.
39. Anderson DR. New York: Springer; 2008. Model based inference in the life sciences.