PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 10.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2836801
NIHMSID: NIHMS176998

Distinct roles of GABAergic interneurons in the regulation of striatal output pathways

Abstract

Striatal GABAergic microcircuits are critical for motor function, yet their properties remain enigmatic due to difficulties in targeting striatal interneurons for electrophysiological analysis. Here, we utilize Lhx6-GFP transgenic mice to identify GABAergic interneurons and investigate their regulation of striatal direct- and indirect-pathway medium spiny neurons (MSNs). We find that the two major interneuron populations, persistent low-threshold spiking (PLTS) and fast spiking (FS) interneurons, differ substantially in their excitatory inputs and inhibitory outputs. Excitatory synaptic currents recorded from PLTS interneurons are characterized by a small, non-rectifying AMPA receptor-mediated component and a NMDA receptor-mediated component. In contrast, glutamatergic synaptic currents in FS interneurons have a large, strongly-rectifying AMPA receptor-mediated component, but no detectable NMDA receptor-mediated responses. Consistent with their axonal morphology, the output of individual PLTS interneurons is relatively weak and sparse, whereas FS interneurons are robustly connected to MSNs and other FS interneurons and appear to mediate the bulk of feedforward inhibition. Synaptic depression of FS outputs is relatively insensitive to firing frequency, and dynamic-clamp experiments reveal that these short-term dynamics enable feedforward inhibition to remain efficacious across a broad frequency range. Surprisingly, we find that FS interneurons preferentially target direct-pathway MSNs over indirect-pathway MSNs, suggesting a potential mechanism for rapid pathway-specific regulation of striatal output pathways.

Keywords: striatum, Microcircuit, Interneuron, Synaptic, Basal Ganglia, GABAergic neuron

Introduction

The striatum is the input nucleus of the basal ganglia and transforms converging thalamic and cortical inputs into two output streams, called the direct- and the indirect-pathways. Although the actions of these two pathways are complex, a simplified model of the basal ganglia circuit posits that the direct pathway facilitates directed movements while the indirect pathway terminates or suppresses movements (Smith et al., 1998). Imbalances in the activity of these two pathways are hypothesized to underlie numerous movement disorders, including Parkinson disease, Huntington’s disease, and dystonia (Graybiel et al., 2000; Galvan and Wichmann, 2007).

At the neuronal level, initial activation of the direct and indirect pathways is determined by the firing of distinct classes of MSNs, which represent the sole output neurons of the striatum (Kreitzer, 2009). MSNs that project in the direct pathway express dopamine D1 receptors and send axons to the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). MSNs that project in the indirect pathway express dopamine D2 receptors and send axons to the globus pallidus (GP). Both classes of MSNs act as integrators for converging excitatory inputs from the neocortex and thalamus, and inhibitory inputs from local interneurons and other MSNs (Wilson, 1998; Kreitzer and Malenka, 2008). Although local GABAergic signaling strongly influences the activity of MSNs (Nisenbaum and Berger, 1992; Wilson, 2007), the role of GABAergic interneurons in regulating direct- or indirect-pathway MSNs remains poorly understood.

The majority of GABAergic control of MSNs arises through feedforward inhibition from local inhibitory interneurons (Tepper et al., 2004). Most feedforward inhibition is mediated by parvalbumin-expressing fast-spiking interneurons (FS), but some feedforward inhibition may also arise from low-threshold spiking interneurons (LTS) (Koos and Tepper, 1999). FS interneurons are well positioned to mediate feedforward inhibition in the striatum because they receive strong cortical innervation (Ramanathan et al., 2002) and respond with faster latency to cortical stimulation than MSNs (Mallet et al., 2005). In turn, FS interneurons project strongly to MSNs (Taverna et al., 2007). Decreased numbers of striatal FS interneurons are associated with Tourette syndrome (Kalanithi et al., 2005) and dystonia (Gernert et al., 2000); FS cells have also been hypothesized to amplify imbalances in striatal output during Parkinson disease (Mallet et al., 2006). Although these studies highlight the importance of GABAergic interneurons in normal striatal function, it is not known whether feedforward inhibition differentially affects MSNs in the direct- or indirect-pathway. In part, this reflects historic difficulties in identifying distinct striatal cell types in acute brain slices, particularly GABAergic interneurons which make up <5% of all striatal neurons. In this paper, we utilize BAC transgenic mouse lines to identify GABAergic interneurons, direct-pathway MSNs, and indirect-pathways MSNs in single brain slices in order to address the role of interneuron subtypes in regulating striatal output pathways.

Materials and Methods

Electrophysiological recordings

Coronal sections (250 – 300 µm thickness) containing dorsal striatum were prepared from brains of 3–5 week-old heterozygous Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mice or Lhx6-GFP mice crossed to Drd1a-tdTomato BAC (GENSAT project, www.gensat.org) on a FVB background. Sections were bisected to generate left and right hemisphere slices. Slices were prepared with a Leica VT1000S vibratome in carbogenated ACSF containing (in mM): 125 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 2.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 12.5 glucose, 2 Mg-ATP, and 0.3 Na-GTP, pH 7.25 or a sucrose cutting solution (in mM): 79 NaCl, 23 NaHCO3, 68 sucrose, 12 glucose, 2.3 KCl, 1.1 NaH2PO4, 6 MgCl2, and 0.5 CaCl2. After recovery for 30 min – 5 hr, experiments were performed on slices perfused with ACSF, warmed to 31 – 33°C. In experiments that measured excitatory transmission, 50 µM picrotoxin (Sigma) was included in the perfusion saline.

Data were collected with a MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices) and ITC-18 A/D board (HEKA) using Igor Pro software (Wavemetrics) and custom acquisition routines (mafPC, courtesy of M.A. Xu-Friedman). Current-clamp recordings were filtered at 10 kHz and digitized at 40 kHz; voltage clamp recordings were filtered at 2 kHz and digitized at 10 kHz. Electrodes were made from borosilicate glass (pipette resistance, 2 – 4 MΩ).

Action potential half-width was calculated as the width of the action potential, measured at a point half-way between threshold and AP peak. AP threshold was defined as the voltage at which the acceleration in voltage exceeded 3×105 V/s/s. Maximum firing rate was measured as the average maximum firing rate over a 500 ms step that could be sustained without entering depolarization block. Input resistance was calculated in voltage clamp as the deviation from the holding current caused by a 5 mV hyperpolarizing step. The change in current was calculated as the difference between baseline holding current and the average current during the last 10 ms of the 40 ms hyperpolarizing voltage step. Whole cell capacitance was calculated by integrating the area under the transient following a 5 mV hyperpolarizing voltage step from the holding potential, −70 mV. The holding current was subtracted before integrating. Rseries was calculated by fitting an exponential to the decay of the transient and using τ = Rseries × whole cell capacitance. Rseries was 6.4 ± 1.8 MΩ for dynamic clamp experiments, 5.9 ± 2.1 MΩ for postsynaptic MSNs in paired recordings, and 8.1 ± 3.8 MΩ for interneurons in paired recordings. Because synaptic currents were usually <500 pA, Rseries compensation was not applied. The synaptic delay was measured from the peak of the action potential to the 10% rise of the IPSC.

Different internal solutions were used, depending on the experiment. (1) To measure neuronal excitability and record from presynaptic interneurons in interneuron-MSN pairs, the internal solution contained (in mM): 130 KMeSO3, 10 NaCl, 2 MgCl2, 0.16 CaCl2, 0.5 EGTA, 10 Hepes, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, pH 7.25 to classify GFP+ neurons as FS or PLTS based on their intrinsic firing properties (Fig. 1). (2) To measure excitatory inputs onto interneurons, the internal solution contained (in mM): 120 CsMeS03, 15 CsCl, 8 NaCl, 0.5 EGTA, 10 Hepes, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, 5 QX-314, pH 7.3. (3) In paired recordings, postsynaptic MSNs were patched with an internal solution containing (in mM): 120 CsCl, 15 CsMeSO3, 8 NaCl, 0.5 EGTA, 10 Hepes, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, 5 QX-314, pH 7.3. (4) To measure synaptic connections between interneurons, the internal solution contained (in mM): 60 KCl, 75 KMeSO3, 8 NaCl, 0.5 EGTA, 10 Hepes, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, pH 7.25.

Figure 1
Striatal GABAergic interneurons can be targeted with GFP fluorescence in Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mice. A. (middle) GFP expression in the dorsal striatum of a 1 month-old Lhx6 mouse. (left) The region of striatum shown is indicated with a box on the schematic. ...

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Tissue preparation was performed as described previously (Palop et al., 2005). Briefly, mice were perfused transcardially with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Brains were removed and drop-fixed with the same fixative at 4°C for 48 hours. After rising with PBS, brains were transferred to 30% sucrose in PBS and stored at 4°C for 24 hours before sectioning. Thin coronal sections (30 µm) were made through forebrains of 5-week old Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mice. Experiments were done on a series of sections, consisting of 5–6 bisected sections, 300 µm apart which spanned the rostral-caudal extent of the striatum. For quantification, cell counts were performed on the most rostral 1– 2 sections per animal and were restricted to the dorsal 2/3 of the striatum (see Fig. 1A). The tissue was blocked with 10% normal donkey serum and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X-100. Primary antibody incubations were performed at 4°C for 48 hr, using either rabbit anti-PV (1:5000, Swant), rabbit anti-NPY (1:2000, Immunostar), rat anti-SOM (1:1000, Chemicon), or rabbit anti-CR (1:3000, Swant). Primary antibodies were detected with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:500, Vector Labs), Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rat (1:500, Vector Labs), or Alexa Fluor 633- conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:500 Vector Labs), incubated for 2 hr. at room temperature.

For cell fills of PLTS interneurons, 0.3% biocytin was dissolved in KMeSO3 internal solution and recordings from PLTS interneurons were obtained. After electrophysiological verification of PLTS properties, cells were filled for 20 – 30 minutes, and the pipette was subsequently withdrawn from the neuron. The slice was fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. The following day, slices were washed in PBS, permeabalized in 5% PBS-TritonX-100 for 30 minutes then 0.5% PBS-TritonX-100 overnight, and developed using the AB Complex (ABC), 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) kit from Vector Labs.

Dynamic Clamp

See supplemental methods for detailed description. Briefly, dynamic clamp was performed using mafPC software routines in Igor Pro. The kinetics and Gmax of excitatory and inhibitory conductances were modeled after experimentally measured values (τe = 5.1 ms ; τi = 6.7 ms). Excitatory Greversal, and inhibitory Greversal were set at 0 mV and −65 mV, respectively. To mimic high frequency inputs that MSNs experience during an ‘up-state’, we injected excitatory conductances at random frequencies ranging from 300 Hz – 600 Hz. Lower frequencies did not drive spiking reliably in MSNs and higher frequencies were not well tolerated. The same stimuli were presented in multiple neurons to measure cell-to-cell variability rather than pattern-to-pattern variability. A total of three different stimuli at each frequency were utilized.

To minimize the variability that would arise from adding random inhibitory conductances onto random excitatory conductances, we kept the interval of inhibitory inputs constant. Inhibitory frequencies were based on the assumption that: (1) any given FS interneuron operates across a dynamic range of 10 – 100 Hz (Berke et al., 2004; Berke, 2008) (2) MSNs receive converging inputs from 4 – 27 FS interneurons (Koos and Tepper, 1999) and (3) FS interneurons do not all fire synchronously (Berke, 2008). To mimic inputs from 4 inhibitory interneurons, each firing at 50 Hz, the frequency of inhibitory conductances was set to 4 × 50 Hz = 200 Hz. Although this assumes that all 4 neurons are firing perfectly out-of-phase with each other, we are using a lower-bound estimate for inhibitory convergence, and the probability of unsynchronized inputs would only increase with more FS neurons.

Results

Lhx6-GFP Mouse Line Labels Striatal GABAergic Interneurons

The LIM homeobox protein 6 (Lhx6) is expressed by cells in the medial ganglionic eminence that develop into parvalbumin (PV), somatostatin (SOM), calretinin (CR), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) expressing interneurons in the neocortex (Cobos et al., 2006) and striatum (Marin et al., 2000). To determine whether the Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mouse line can be used to efficiently target striatal GABAergic interneurons in acute brain slices, we recorded from GFP+ and GFP− neurons in the striatum of 3 – 5-week old Lhx6-GFP transgenic mice. As shown in Fig. 1A, neurons labeled with GFP were scattered throughout the striatum of Lhx6-GFP mice and accounted for 2.6% of all striatal neurons, labeled with the neuronal marker NeuN.

Differences in the electrophysiological properties of striatal cell types are well documented (Kreitzer, 2009), enabling our identification of MSNs, FS, PLTS, and cholinergic interneurons based on a combination of passive and active membrane properties (Table 1). Figure 1E demonstrates the use of three parameters (maximum firing rate, Vrest, and action potential half-width) to distinguish all four classes of striatal neurons. All of the 55 GFP+ neurons targeted in the Lhx6-GFP line had electrophysiological properties of either PLTS (59%) or FS (41%) interneurons (Fig. 1B–D), but not MSNs or cholinergic interneurons. In current clamp, FS interneurons can be distinguished from PLTS interneurons by their narrower action potentials (p < 0.0001), higher maximum firing rates (p < 0.0001), and lower resting membrane potentials (p < 0.0001) (Fig. C–D). In voltage clamp at Vhold = −70 mV, FS interneurons have more positive holding currents (p < 0.0001), lower input resistances (p < 0.0001), and higher cell capacitances (p < 0.0001) compared to PLTS interneurons (Fig. 1F–H). These data demonstrate that striatal GABAergic interneurons are selectively labeled in the Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mouse line, which therefore represents a new tool for targeting these interneurons for electrophysiological study in acute brain slices.

Table 1
Intrinsic properties of striatal neurons

Table 2 shows the enhanced success rate for targeting GABAergic interneurons in the striatum using the Lhx6-GFP line relative to other approaches, including the traditional approach of visual identification in wildtype mice, or crossing a Drd2-GFP BAC transgenic mouse line with a Drd1a-tdTomato BAC transgenic line (Shuen et al., 2008) (D1-D2-XFP) and recording from non-fluorescent neurons. All fluorescent neurons targeted in Lhx6-GFP mice are GABAergic interneurons, enabling rapid and reliable identification of this sparse neuronal population in acute brain slices, significantly advancing our ability to study the roles of these interneurons in shaping striatal microcircuits.

Table 2
Probabilities of finding striatal cell types when targeting interneurons in acute brain slices

Fluorescently Labeled Neurons in Lhx6-GFP Transgenic Mice Express PV or NPY/SOM

FS GABAergic interneurons in the striatum express parvalbumin (PV) while PLTS interneurons express neuropeptide Y (NPY), somatostatin (SOM), and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) (Kawaguchi et al., 1995). To verify that these interneuron markers are expressed in GFP+ neurons in the Lhx6 line, we performed immunostains on a series of 30 µm sections collected from three 1 month-old Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mice. From each mouse, one series of sections was stained with antibodies against PV (Fig. 2A) and another with antibodies against NPY and SOM (Fig. 2B). The number of neurons expressing each marker was pooled across sections.

Figure 2
GFP+ neurons in the Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic line express markers of striatal interneurons. A. Results of immunostaining in dorsal striatum of an Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mouse, showing colabeling of GFP+ neurons with PV. Double labeled neurons are yellow. ...

In sections labeled with antibodies against NPY and SOM, 61% (257 / 420) of GFP+ neurons expressed one or both markers, which showed >90% overlap in the striatum. In sections labeled with antibodies against PV, 34% (136 / 403) of GFP+ neurons were labeled. As shown in Fig. 2C, combining the cell counts from these sections suggests that 95% of GFP+ neurons in the Lhx6 mouse line express either NPY/SOM or PV. The ratio of NPY/SOM labeled neurons relative to that of PV labeled neurons was very similar to the ratio of PLTS : FS interneurons measured electrophysiologically in Fig. 1, further validating the Lhx6-GFP line for targeting GABAergic interneurons in the striatum.

To determine the identity of the remaining 5% of unlabeled GFP+ neurons, we performed an additional immunostain for the interneuron marker calretinin (CR), which labels a distinct class of interneurons in the striatum (Figueredo-Cardenas et al., 1996). In contrast to primates and rats, CR staining was sparse in the striatum of mice (Supplementary Figure 1). Although we observed robust CR staining in the neocortex, a total of only 47 CR+ neurons were counted across 3 striatal sections, in contrast to 626 GFP+ neurons. Only 17 of the CR+ neurons expressed GFP, therefore 3% of previously unlabeled GFP+ neurons likely express CR. Taken together, approximately 98% of GFP+ neurons in Lhx6-GFP mice were labeled with antibodies against PV, NPY/SOM, or CR.

To estimate the fraction of all PV or NPY/SOM neurons that express GFP in Lhx6-GFP mice, we counted the total number of neurons expressing these markers in our sections. A high percentage of NPY/SOM+ neurons (81%, 257 / 318) were labeled by GFP while only about half of PV+ neurons were labeled (47%, 136 / 289). Although the population of PV+ interneurons is not fully represented in the Lhx6-GFP line, a comparison of the firing properties of FS interneurons recorded in Lhx6-GFP mice relative to those targeted in other mouse lines yielded nearly overlapping firing properties with only a small difference in action potential half-width (Supplementary Figure 2). This indicates that GFP expression does not label an electrophysiologically distinct subpopulation of FS interneurons in Lhx6-GFP mice.

Excitatory Synapses onto FS and PLTS Interneurons Have Distinct Properties

To measure excitatory inputs onto FS and PLTS interneurons, GFP+ neurons were patched in whole-cell voltage clamp configuration (Vhold = −70 mV) in the presence of picrotoxin (50 µM), to block fast GABAergic signaling. In some of the experiments, a K-based internal solution was used in order to distinguish FS and PLTS interneurons, using physiological firing properties as described above (FS: n = 19, PLTS n = 9). In a subset of experiments requiring depolarization of neurons, a Cs-based internal solution containing QX-314 was used to block action potentials and improve voltage-clamp (FS: n = 9, PLTS n = 24). In these latter experiments, FS and PLTS interneurons were readily identified by their characteristic input resistance, capacitance, and holding potential (at −70 mV) measured immediately upon break-in. The choice of internal solution did not significantly affect the amplitude or kinetics of the EPSCs (K-based vs. Cs-based internal: FS amp, p = 0.24; PLTS amp, p = 0.19; FS decay, p = 0.53; PLTS decay p = 0.47), so data was pooled.

Once an interneuron was identified as FS or PLTS, a glass stimulating electrode containing saline was placed in the striatum. Small currents, 0.3 ms in duration, were passed across the stimulating electrode to evoke EPSCs from excitatory striatal afferents. In FS interneurons, fast and large EPSCs (255 ± 119 pA, n = 20) were evoked at small stimulation amplitudes (5.5 ± 2.7 µA) and increased in size as a function of stimulus intensity (Fig. 3A &C). In contrast, higher stimulus intensities were required to evoke EPSCs in PLTS interneurons. At an average stimulus intensity of 9.7 ± 3.0 µA, EPSCs in PLTS interneurons were 86.2 ± 60 pA, n = 31 and rarely exceeded 200 pA, even at stimulus intensities between 20 – 50 µA (Fig. 3B–C).

Figure 3
Synaptic properties of excitatory afferents onto GABAergic interneurons. A. EPSCs elicited by intrastriatal stimulation (5 µA, 0.3 ms) in an FS interneuron. B. Paired-pulse ratio (PPR) as a function of the interstimulus interval for FS interneurons ...

To investigate the probability of release at excitatory synapses onto interneurons, the paired-pulse ratio (PPR) was calculated. Two pulses were given with a variable interstimulus interval (25 to 500 ms), and the amplitude ratio of EPSC2/EPSC1 was measured (lower panels, Fig. 3A–B). FS interneurons demonstrated synaptic facilitation at short interstimulus intervals, in contrast to PLTS interneurons, which showed modest paired-pulse depression at all intervals tested. These results are consistent with a model in which FS interneurons receive a large number of synaptic inputs with a relatively lower release probability, and PLTS interneurons receive just a few synaptic inputs with a relatively higher release probability.

The postsynaptic features of excitatory synapses were investigated by determining the voltage-dependence of EPSCs, as well as the AMPA and NMDA receptor contributions to postsynaptic potentials. EPSCs exhibited more rapid decay kinetics in FS vs. PLTS interneurons (1.5 ± 0.1 ms, n = 28 vs. 3.50 ± 0.30 ms, n=33, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3D). In FS interneurons, large EPSCs were evoked at hyperpolarized holding potentials, whereas at depolarized potentials, virtually no outward current was detected (Fig. 3E) indicating the presence of GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors and the absence of NMDA receptors. Across all FS interneurons, the voltage-dependence of the peak EPSC amplitude showed marked rectification at depolarized potentials. In contrast, EPSCs in PLTS interneurons were composed of a relatively rapid AMPA-mediated component and a slower NMDA-mediated component, which was blocked by bath application of D-APV (50 µM) (Fig. 3E). To calculate the ratio of AMPA- to NMDA-receptor-mediated components of the EPSC in PLTS interneurons, the AMPA-mediated conductance, measured at −70 mV was compared with the NMDA-mediated conductance, measured at +40 mV. The average AMPA : NMDA ratio was 1.4 ± 1.0 (n=6) in PLTS interneurons (Fig. 3F), indicating a relatively large NMDA component. The voltage-dependence of the residual AMPA-mediated component of the EPSC in APV showed only mild rectification, indicating the presence of GluR2-containing AMPA receptors (Fig. 3E). The presence of calcium-permeable GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors and undetectable NMDA receptors at FS inputs, compared with the presence of calcium-impermeable GluR2-containing AMPA receptors and NMDA receptors at PLTS inputs, suggests that distinct forms of long-term synaptic plasticity may be expressed at these synapses.

PLTS Interneurons are Sparsely Connected to Other Striatal Neurons

To measure inhibitory inputs from PLTS interneurons onto MSNs, paired whole-cell recordings were established between presynaptic PLTS interneurons and postsynaptic MSNs within a 250 µm radius (average distance sampled = 153 ± 80 µm). A high-chloride Cs-based internal solution was used to record from postsynaptic MSNs in the voltage-clamp configuration (Vhold = −70 mV) to better resolve GABAergic synaptic transmission. Presynaptic PLTS interneurons were targeted using GFP fluorescence in Lhx6-GFP mice and identified electrophysiologically, using a combination of voltage-clamp and current-clamp parameters (see Fig. 1 and Table 1). In recordings from 60 pairs of neurons, functional connections were only observed twice, consistent with the sparse axonal morphology of PLTS interneurons (Kawaguchi, 1993). PLTS synapses recorded in MSNs were very weak and displayed asynchronous release (11 pA and 28 pA) (Fig. 4A–E). Because pairs of action potentials can be insufficient to reveal functional connections at some synapses (Foldy et al., 2007), we conducted additional tests for connectivity in 16 pairs using trains of 10 action potentials, at frequencies ranging from 10 – 100 Hz (Fig. 4 B&D). Higher levels of presynaptic activity did not reveal any additional functional connections.

Figure 4
Local connectivity of PLTS interneurons. A. Paired recording in which no functional connection was found between a presynaptic PLTS interneuron and a postsynaptic MSN (observed for 58 / 60 pairs). Throughout, dashed lines represent the detection threshold ...

Given the abundance of PLTS interneurons in the striatum, it was surprising that their inhibitory projections onto MSNs were weak and sparse. We hypothesized that perhaps PLTS interneurons more robustly inhibit other classes of striatal neurons, such as other PLTS, FS, or cholinergic interneurons. To test this hypothesis, we recorded from pairs of interneurons using a KMeSO3 internal solution with high [Cl]i to set ECl = −20 mV. This enables better detection of GABAergic synaptic transmission and allowed bidirectional tests for connectivity. However, PLTS connectivity was similarly sparse onto all classes of striatal neurons (Fig. 4E). No functional connections were observed between PLTS-PLTS pairs (0/26), PLTS-FS pairs (0/8), or PLTS-cholinergic pairs (0/10). To ensure that the axons of PLTS interneurons were preserved in our slices, the morphology of 3 biocytin-filled PLTS interneurons was examined (Fig. 4F). PLTS axons were well preserved in our coronal sections (average axon length: 144 ± 51 µm, n=7), indicating that the angle of the slice preparation is unlikely to account for the low connectivity of PLTS interneurons. Together, these data indicate that PLTS interneurons are unlikely to provide a major source of feedforward inhibition in the striatum.

FS Interneurons Mediate Feedforward Inhibition in the Striatum

In contrast to PLTS interneurons, FS interneurons were robustly connected to MSNs within a 250 µm radius (average distance sampled = 106 ± 25 µm) (Fig. 5A–C). A high-chloride CsMeSO3 internal solution was used to record from postsynaptic MSNs in the voltage-clamp configuration (Vhold = −70 mV). Experiments were initiated by establishing whole-cell recordings from FS interneurons (identified using a combination of voltage-clamp and current-clamp parameters, Fig. 1 and Table 1). Once a recording was successfully obtained, postsynaptic MSNs were targeted for recording. Typically 1– 8 (average 2.4) MSNs were sampled per interneuron.

Figure 5
Local connectivity of FS interneurons. A. Paired recording showing a typical functional connection between a presynaptic FS interneuron and a postsynaptic MSN. B. Histogram showing the bi-modal distribution of uIPSC amplitudes recorded between presynaptic ...

Synaptic connections were found between 45% of FS-MSN pairs (75 / 167). The amplitudes of unitary IPSCs (uIPSCs) measured in postsynaptic MSNs were bi-modally distributed, with one peak at 65.3 pA and the other at 1185 pA, corresponding to peak conductances of 0.9 nS and 16.9 nS, respectively (Fig. 5B). This bi-modal distribution is unlikely to represent distinct classes of FS interneurons because the same presynaptic FS interneuron could evoke either large or small uIPSCs depending on the postsynaptic partner. In one example, the same FS interneuron evoked a uIPSC of 1491 pA in one MSN, 1109 pA in another, and 304 pA in a third MSN. Unitary IPSCs exhibited rapid rise (1.2 ± 1.2 ms) and decay kinetics (8.0 ± 3.2 ms, n = 68), low failure rates (< 1%), synaptic delays of 0.88 ± 0.23 ms and paired-pulse ratios less than 1 (0.67 ± 0.22 ms, n = 46), indicative of a high probability of transmitter release.

In addition to GABAergic projections onto MSNs, FS interneurons also formed GABAergic synapses onto other FS interneurons, but not PLTS or cholinergic interneurons (Fig. 5 D–E). In these experiments, interneurons were recorded with a KMeSO3 internal solution containing a high [Cl−]i to set ECl = −20 mV. This enabled identification of FS interneurons based on voltage-clamp and current-clamp parameters while increasing the driving force of Cl− to better detect GABAergic synaptic transmission. The probability of finding a synaptic connection between pairs of FS interneurons was 58% (7 / 12), and 3 out of 4 connected pairs were reciprocally connected. The conductance of FS-FS synapses was significantly lower than that of FS-MSN synapses (1.1 ± 1.5 nS, n = 6 vs. 7.8 ± 11.2 nS, n = 69; p = 0.009) (Fig. 5F) but the two types of synapses had similar decay kinetics (5.7 ± 2.7 ms vs. 8.0 ± 3.2 ms; p = 0.1) and paired-pulse ratios (0.69 ± 0.29 vs. 0.68 ± 0.22; p = 0.83) (Fig. 5G–H).

Short-term Dynamics of Feedforward Inhibition Enables Effective Inhibition Across a Broad Dynamic Range

Recordings from the striatum of awake behaving mice reveal that FS interneurons express average firing rates of 10 – 15 Hz and modulate their firing rates up to 60 – 80 Hz during behavioral tasks (Berke et al., 2004; Berke, 2008). To understand how feedforward inhibition from FS interneurons affects the firing rates of MSNs (and therefore output of the striatum), it is necessary to consider how synaptic efficacy at FS synapses changes as a function of neuronal firing rate.

To measure how short-term, activity-dependent plasticity affects synaptic efficacy at FS-MSN synapses, action potentials were elicited in presynaptic FS interneurons at frequencies of 10, 20, 50, or 100 Hz. Short-term plasticity was measured by recording changes in the amplitude of uIPSCs in synaptically connected MSNs (Vhold = −70 mV). Trains of action potentials were delivered every 20 s to allow synapses time to return to baseline levels and no persistent changes in uIPSC were observed. Figure 6A shows changes in uIPSCs in a postsynaptic MSN during a train of 10 action potentials evoked at different frequencies in a presynaptic FS interneuron. Due to the high [Cl]i internal used to record from MSNs, uIPSCs are inward. To calculate the amplitude of IPSCs during a train, the peak amplitude of each uIPSC was subtracted by a ‘baseline value’, calculated using an exponential fit to the decay of the preceding IPSC. This method controls for summation of charge during a train and measures only changes in synaptic transmission.

Figure 6
Short-term dynamics of synaptic transmission at FS-MSN synapses. A. Paired recording between a presynaptic FS interneuron and a postsynaptic MSN, showing typical short-term depression during a train of 10 action potentials at 10, 20, and 50 Hz. B. Summary ...

As shown in Figure 6B, FS synapses showed marked depression at all frequencies tested: 0.34 ± 0.16 at 10 Hz, 0.29 ± 0.15 at 20 Hz, 0.23 ± 0.13 at 50 Hz, and 0.17 ± 0.08 at 100 Hz, n = 24, p < 0.0001 at all frequencies. Although depression changed somewhat with frequency, increasing by 11% between 10 – 50 Hz, this change was relatively small compared to synaptic depression at synapses with canonical frequency-dependent depression (Abbott et al., 1997; Dittman and Regehr, 1998; Markram et al., 1998). This type of frequency-independent depression is a common feature of FS interneurons in other brain regions (Galarreta and Hestrin, 1998; Varela et al., 1999; Gabernet et al., 2005).

To test how the short-term dynamics of FS synapses shape the input-output functions of MSNs over rapid time scales, we utilized dynamic clamp. The input-output functions of MSNs were measured by calculating the average neuronal firing rates evoked by 2 s of simulated EPSCs (sEPSCs) at frequencies between 300 – 600 Hz (Fig. 6C–D). This frequency range is similar to that required to drive up-state transitions in cultured MSNs (Blackwell et al., 2003). In the absence of inhibition, the firing rates of MSNs increased sub-linearly as a function of input frequency (Fig. 6G).

To measure how the dynamics of feedforward inhibition affect the input-output transformations of MSNs, sEPSCs were repeated in conjunction with sIPSCs displaying either frequency-dependent or frequency-independent depression (Fig. 6C, E–F). The parameters of frequency-independent depression were based on data from FS interneuron synapses onto MSNs. Hypothetical values of frequency-dependent depression were derived from climbing fiber synapses onto Purkinje cells because they resemble FS synapses onto MSNs in terms of their basket-like morphology and dynamic range (Dittman and Regehr, 1998). In the case of frequency-independent depression, sIPSCs acted like an attenuating filter, decreasing MSN firing rates similarly at all frequencies tested (Fig. 6G–H). In contrast, sIPSCs displaying frequency-dependent inhibition acted like a high-pass filter because MSN firing rates were effectively inhibited at the low end of their dynamic range but not at the high (Fig. 6G–H). Although these dynamic clamp experiments do not capture the precise timing or subcellular localization of excitatory and inhibitory inputs, they demonstrate the importance of frequency-independent depression at FS synapses to maintain effective inhibition of MSNs across a broad dynamic range of inputs to the circuit.

Feedforward Inhibition is Pathway Specific

The output of the striatum depends not only on the firing rates of MSNs, but also on which MSNs are firing. Approximately half of the MSNs in the striatum project to the GP and give rise to the indirect pathway while the other half project to the SNr and give rise to the direct pathway (Wilson, 1998). Despite the important distinctions between these pathways, there has never been an analysis of how feedforward inhibition affects one pathway relative to the other.

To distinguish direct- from indirect-pathway MSNs in slices from Lhx6-GFP mice, Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mice were crossed to Drd1a-tdTomato BAC transgenic mice (Shuen et al., 2008). The offspring of these crosses express tdTomato in direct-pathway MSNs and GFP in GABAergic interneurons, enabling the identification of direct-pathway MSNs, indirect-pathway MSNs, and GABAergic interneurons in a single brain slice (Fig. 7A). We estimate that tdTomato expression in Drd1a-tdTomato BAC transgenic mice labels approximately 96% of direct-pathway MSNs (Table 2). This is in contrast to a previous report that suggested a larger number of unlabeled MSNs (Shuen et al., 2008), but is consistent with a second study that found more complete labeling in a similar mouse line (Gertler et al., 2008).

Figure 7
FS interneurons preferentially target direct-pathway MSNs. A. IR-DIC (left) and fluorescent images (middle) from a living striatal slice of a 1 month-old Lhx6-GFP/Drd1a-tdTomato transgenic mouse. The images are overlayed (right) to show the identification ...

To determine whether feedforward inhibition is different onto direct- vs. indirect-pathway MSNs, paired recordings were established between GFP+ FS interneurons and direct- or indirect-pathway MSNs, identified using the presence or absence of tdTomato fluorescence (Fig. 7B). Over half (48 / 90) of FS -> direct-pathway MSN pairs were functionally connected, compared to only 36% (27 / 77) of FS -> indirect pathway MSN pairs (p = 0.02) (Fig. 7C). It was often possible to sample multiple postsynaptic MSNs per presynaptic interneuron, enabling the connectivity of single FS interneurons with MSNs in both pathways to be assessed. Figure 7B shows a recording from an FS interneuron that made inhibitory synapses onto MSNs in both pathways. Out of 28 FS interneurons where synaptic connectivity was tested onto both direct- and indirect-pathway MSNs, functional connections with both pathways were found for 11 neurons. This demonstrates that single FS interneurons can regulate the activity of both direct- and indirect-pathway MSNs, but it does not rule out the possibility that some FS interneurons target MSNs of a single subtype.

Although the probability of synaptic connectivity was higher between FS interneurons and direct-pathway MSNs, inhibitory synapses onto MSNs in both pathways were similar (Fig. 7D–G). There was no difference in the uIPSC amplitude (501 ± 760 pA, n = 43 vs. 578 ± 834 pA, n = 26; p = 0.66), decay kinetics (8.1 ± 3.6 ms vs. 7.6 ± 2.3 ms; p = 0.94), PPR (0.69 ± 0.25 vs. 0.66 ± 0.18; p = 0.62), latency (0.84 ± 0.17 ms vs. 0.93 ± 0.29 ms; p = 0.53) or short-term dynamics of FS synapses onto direct- or indirect-pathway MSNs. Together, our data indicate that FS interneurons make similar synaptic contacts onto direct- and indirect-pathway MSNs, but show a significant preference for direct-pathway MSNs.

Discussion

Progress in understanding how striatal microcircuits control activity of MSNs has been hampered by difficulties in targeting GABAergic interneurons for electrophysiological analysis. Here we present the Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mouse line as a tool to rapidly identify GABAergic interneurons in living striatal slices. We find that FS interneurons represent the main source of feedforward inhibition in the mouse striatum and that their synapses are tuned for stable inhibition of MSNs across a broad frequency range. FS projections preferentially target direct-pathway MSNs relative to indirect-pathway MSNs, suggesting a mechanism for pathway-specific regulation of striatal output.

GABAergic Interneurons are Labeled in the Lhx6-GFP BAC transgenic mice

All neurons labeled with GFP in Lhx6-GFP mice have the electrophysiological properties of FS or PLTS interneurons, consistent with reports that these two cell types represent the majority of GABAergic interneurons in the striatum (Kawaguchi, 1993; Koos and Tepper, 1999; Tepper and Bolam, 2004). Although GFP expression in the Lhx6 line did not label all PV+ or NPY/SOM+ neurons in the striatum, 95% of GFP+ neurons expressed one of these markers. Of the remaining 5% of GPF+ neurons that did not express PV or NPY/SOM, 3% likely represent CR expressing interneurons. The remaining 2% may represent neurons in which interneuron markers were not detected due to low expression levels of the proteins or may represent small populations of other classes of interneurons, such as VIP or AADC expressing interneurons (Theriault and Landis, 1987; Mura et al., 2000)

A major subpopulation of GABAergic interneurons that express CR in rats was notably absent from the striatum of mice, indicating an important species distinction in the prevalence of CR interneurons (Wu and Parent, 2000). In rats, CR+ interneurons may correspond electrophysiologically to low-threshold spiking (LTS) interneurons that lack plateau potentials and provide feedforward inhibition to MSNs, similar in magnitude to that from FS interneurons (Koos and Tepper, 1999; Tepper and Bolam, 2004). These LTS interneurons were never encountered in the mouse striatum.

Implications for Different Excitatory Synapses onto FS and PLTS Interneurons

FS interneurons receive significantly larger amplitude excitatory inputs than PLTS interneurons. This could mean that FS interneurons are more sensitive to changes in excitatory inputs or it could reflect adaptation of synaptic strength to drive action potentials. FS interneurons have a lower membrane input resistance and thus require stronger excitatory currents to drive them to spike threshold compared to PLTS interneurons, which exhibit higher input resistances. Support for the latter hypothesis comes from our observation that even small EPSPs are sufficient to drive firing in PLTS interneurons (data not shown).

We found that FS and PLTS interneurons express different types of synaptic AMPA receptors. The I–V curve of the AMPA component was strongly rectifying in FS interneurons but only weakly rectifying in PLTS interneurons, suggesting a much stronger contribution from GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors in FS interneurons relative to that in PLTS interneurons. The presence of GluR2-lacking, Ca2+-permeable AMPARs is a common feature of excitatory synapses onto FS interneurons in other brain regions as well, where they are hypothesized to endow FS interneurons with greater temporal precision and unique forms of short- and long-term plasticity (McBain and Fisahn, 2001; Isaac et al., 2007). The modest rectification and slower decay time constants of AMPA receptor-mediated currents in PLTS interneurons suggests the presence of both GluR2-lacking and GluR2-containing AMPAR, similar to AMPAR expressed in MSNs (Kreitzer and Malenka, 2007). In summary, differences in the glutamate receptors of FS and PLTS interneurons may endow these cell types with unique features, including differential recruitment in the striatal microcircuit, distinct firing patterns during synaptic activation, and cell-type specific forms of neuromodulation and synaptic plasticity.

Alternative Roles for PLTS Interneurons in Regulating Striatal Function

Although PLTS interneurons receive excitatory inputs, our results demonstrate that they are sparsely connected to other neurons in the striatal circuit and form weak inhibitory synapses, likely onto the distal dendrites of MSNs. This is consistent with anatomical observations that the axonal arborizations of PLTS interneurons are far less dense compared to those of FS interneurons (Kawaguchi, 1993), and that SOM+ GABAergic terminals have been observed on the dendrites of MSNs (Kubota and Kawaguchi, 2000). This suggests that synapses from PLTS interneurons may affect dendritic excitability but are unlikely to directly influence MSN output. Furthermore, although the apparent connectivity of PLTS interneurons is low, we cannot rule out that these connections are strengthened under certain conditions such as strong neuromodulation or in disease states (Dehorter et al., 2009).

Rather than playing a role in feedforward inhibition, the main function of PLTS interneurons may instead be to release neuromodulators such as NPY, SOM, and NO, which could modulate striatal circuitry with distinct spatial and temporal patterns relative to fast synaptic transmission (Steinert et al., 2008; O'Donnell and Grace, 1997; West et al., 2002; West and Grace, 2004; Galarraga et al., 2007; Lopez-Huerta et al., 2008). Axon terminals containing only NPY and no GABA have also been observed at synapses onto MSNs (Aoki and Pickel, 1989) and in close proximity to glia and blood vessels (Aoki and Pickel, 1990), suggesting that PLTS interneurons may potentially regulate blood flow or glial signaling in the striatum.

Dynamics of Feedforward Inhibition Influences Input-Output Transformations of MSNs

Although previous studies have identified FS interneurons as a source of feedforward inhibition capable of modulating MSN firing rates at low frequencies (Koos and Tepper, 1999; Koos et al., 2004), few studies have considered how they operate over a range of dynamic inputs to the circuit that would be experienced in vivo. MSNs receive thousands of excitatory inputs (10,000 – 15,000) (Wilson, 1998) but receive inhibitory inputs from only 4 – 27 FS interneurons (Koos and Tepper, 1999). Despite this asymmetry, recordings from cultured MSNs suggest that excitation and inhibition remain balanced across a broad range of inputs (Blackwell et al., 2003). This suggests that in the striatum, inhibition from a small number of FS interneurons balances excitation from thousands of excitatory inputs, a neuronal architecture likely preserved in a number of other brain regions.

How could inhibition from so few synapses balance excitation from so many? Individual cortical pyramidal neurons rarely fire > 10 Hz (de Kock et al., 2007), but FS interneurons exhibit firing rates an order of magnitude faster, typically firing 10 – 100 Hz in vivo (Berke et al., 2004; Berke, 2008) and are more responsive to excitatory inputs than MSNs (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997; Ramanathan et al., 2002; Mallet et al., 2005). This difference in operating frequency could permit a small number of rapidly-firing inhibitory inputs to balance a large number of slowly-firing excitatory inputs. This scenario requires that FS synapses maintain the same level of synaptic efficacy over a broader dynamic range than excitatory synapses. This capability is mediated by the short-term dynamics of FS synapses, which depress during repetitive activation in a manner that is relatively independent of frequency. This frequency-independent depression has been observed at a number of other synapses (Galarreta and Hestrin, 1998; Varela et al., 1999; Telgkamp and Raman, 2002; Gabernet et al., 2005; Arenz et al., 2008) and can enable linear computations of circuit input (Bagnall et al., 2008). In the striatum, frequency-independent depression acts as an attenuating filter, preserving the relative input-output computations of MSNs. If instead, depression at FS synapses was not frequency-independent and changed in a frequency-dependent manner, it would perform a high-pass filtering function on the outputs of MSNs, altering the nature of striatal processing.

Implications of Different Feedforward Inhibition onto Direct- and Indirect-pathway MSNs for Striatal Function

In this study, we show for the first time that FS interneurons target both direct and indirect-pathway MSNs, but are more likely to target MSNs in the direct pathway. Although the direct and indirect pathways appear to serve distinct functions, nothing is known about the computational principles that distinguish these circuits. One early hint that cortical inputs might differentially affect striatal output pathways came from a study of immediate-early gene activation following sensorimotor cortical stimulation (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997). In this work, the authors observed that cortical stimulation led to the selective activation of PV+ (fast-spiking) interneurons and enkephalin-positive (indirect-pathway) MSNs, but far fewer direct-pathway MSNs. Our finding that feedforward inhibition is significantly more prominent in striatal direct-pathway MSNs provides a mechanism that could underlie their relatively weaker activation following cortical stimulation.

The finding that feedforward inhibition is a more prominent feature of the direct-pathway may underlie the fact that neurological diseases associated with hyper-activation of the direct-pathway (Tourette syndrome and dystonia) are correlated with decreased numbers of striatal FS interneurons (Gernert et al., 2000; Kalanithi et al., 2005). The ability of FS interneurons to target hundreds of MSNs and differentially regulate direct-and indirect-pathway MSNs places them in a central position to regulate the balance of striatal output. By targeting a relatively small population of neurons in the striatum, it may be possible to therapeutically adjust the balance of direct- and indirect-pathway striatal output to alleviate motor dysfunction in a number of neurological diseases associated with the basal ganglia, including Tourette syndrome, dystonia, Parkinson disease, and Huntington’s disease.

Supplementary Material

Supp1

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to M.A. Xu-Friedman for dynamic clamp and acquisition code for Igor Pro, and John Rubenstein and Inma Cobos for helpful discussion. We thank Nicole Calakos for her generous gift of the Drd1a-tdTomato mice and Sebastian Peck for help with microscopy. Some data in this study were acquired at the Nikon Imaging center at the University of California, San Francisco. This work was supported by NIH grant R01 NS064984, the Pew Biomedical Scholars Program, the W.M. Keck Foundation, and the Wayne and Gladys Valley Foundation.

References

Abbott LF, Varela JA, Sen K, Nelson SB. Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science. 1997;275:220–224. [PubMed]
Aoki C, Pickel VM. Neuropeptide Y in the cerebral cortex and the caudate-putamen nuclei: ultrastructural basis for interactions with GABAergic and non-GABAergic neurons. J Neurosci. 1989;9:4333–4354. [PubMed]
Aoki C, Pickel VM. Neuropeptide Y in cortex and striatum. Ultrastructural distribution and coexistence with classical neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;611:186–205. [PubMed]
Arenz A, Silver RA, Schaefer AT, Margrie TW. The contribution of single synapses to sensory representation in vivo. Science. 2008;321:977–980. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Bagnall MW, McElvain LE, Faulstich M, du Lac S. Frequency-independent synaptic transmission supports a linear vestibular behavior. Neuron. 2008;60:343–352. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Berke JD. Uncoordinated firing rate changes of striatal fast-spiking interneurons during behavioral task performance. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10075–10080. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Berke JD, Okatan M, Skurski J, Eichenbaum HB. Oscillatory entrainment of striatal neurons in freely moving rats. Neuron. 2004;43:883–896. [PubMed]
Blackwell KT, Czubayko U, Plenz D. Quantitative estimate of synaptic inputs to striatal neurons during up and down states in vitro. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9123–9132. [PubMed]
Cobos I, Long JE, Thwin MT, Rubenstein JL. Cellular patterns of transcription factor expression in developing cortical interneurons. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16 Suppl 1:i82–i88. [PubMed]
de Kock CP, Bruno RM, Spors H, Sakmann B. Layer- and cell-type-specific suprathreshold stimulus representation in rat primary somatosensory cortex. J Physiol. 2007;581:139–154. [PubMed]
Dehorter N, Guigoni C, Lopez C, Hirsch J, Eusebio A, Ben-Ari Y, Hammond C. Dopamine-deprived striatal GABAergic interneurons burst and generate repetitive gigantic IPSCs in medium spiny neurons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7776–7787. [PubMed]
Dittman JS, Regehr WG. Calcium dependence and recovery kinetics of presynaptic depression at the climbing fiber to Purkinje cell synapse. J Neurosci. 1998;18:6147–6162. [PubMed]
Figueredo-Cardenas G, Medina L, Reiner A. Calretinin is largely localized to a unique population of striatal interneurons in rats. Brain Res. 1996;709:145–150. [PubMed]
Foldy C, Lee SY, Szabadics J, Neu A, Soltesz I. Cell type-specific gating of perisomatic inhibition by cholecystokinin. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1128–1130. [PubMed]
Gabernet L, Jadhav SP, Feldman DE, Carandini M, Scanziani M. Somatosensory integration controlled by dynamic thalamocortical feed-forward inhibition. Neuron. 2005;48:315–327. [PubMed]
Galarraga E, Vilchis C, Tkatch T, Salgado H, Tecuapetla F, Perez-Rosello T, Perez-Garci E, Hernandez-Echeagaray E, Surmeier DJ, Bargas J. Somatostatinergic modulation of firing pattern and calcium-activated potassium currents in medium spiny neostriatal neurons. Neuroscience. 2007;146:537–554. [PubMed]
Galarreta M, Hestrin S. Frequency-dependent synaptic depression and the balance of excitation and inhibition in the neocortex. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1:587–594. [PubMed]
Galvan A, Wichmann T. GABAergic circuits in the basal ganglia and movement disorders. Prog Brain Res. 2007;160:287–312. [PubMed]
Gernert M, Hamann M, Bennay M, Loscher W, Richter A. Deficit of striatal parvalbumin-reactive GABAergic interneurons and decreased basal ganglia output in a genetic rodent model of idiopathic paroxysmal dystonia. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7052–7058. [PubMed]
Gertler TS, Chan CS, Surmeier DJ. Dichotomous anatomical properties of adult striatal medium spiny neurons. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10814–10824. [PubMed]
Graybiel AM, Canales JJ, Capper-Loup C. Levodopa-induced dyskinesias and dopamine-dependent stereotypies: a new hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:S71–S77. [PubMed]
Isaac JT, Ashby M, McBain CJ. The role of the GluR2 subunit in AMPA receptor function and synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2007;54:859–871. [PubMed]
Kalanithi PS, Zheng W, Kataoka Y, DiFiglia M, Grantz H, Saper CB, Schwartz ML, Leckman JF, Vaccarino FM. Altered parvalbumin-positive neuron distribution in basal ganglia of individuals with Tourette syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:13307–13312. [PubMed]
Kawaguchi Y. Physiological, morphological, and histochemical characterization of three classes of interneurons in rat neostriatum. J Neurosci. 1993;13:4908–4923. [PubMed]
Kawaguchi Y, Wilson CJ, Augood SJ, Emson PC. Striatal interneurones: chemical, physiological and morphological characterization. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:527–535. [PubMed]
Koos T, Tepper JM. Inhibitory control of neostriatal projection neurons by GABAergic interneurons. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:467–472. [PubMed]
Koos T, Tepper JM, Wilson CJ. Comparison of IPSCs evoked by spiny and fast-spiking neurons in the neostriatum. J Neurosci. 2004;24:7916–7922. [PubMed]
Kreitzer AC. Physiology and pharmacology of striatal neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:127–147. [PubMed]
Kreitzer AC, Malenka RC. Endocannabinoid-mediated rescue of striatal LTD and motor deficits in Parkinson's disease models. Nature. 2007;445:643–647. [PubMed]
Kreitzer AC, Malenka RC. Striatal plasticity and basal ganglia circuit function. Neuron. 2008;60:543–554. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Kubota Y, Kawaguchi Y. Dependence of GABAergic synaptic areas on the interneuron type and target size. J Neurosci. 2000;20:375–386. [PubMed]
Lopez-Huerta VG, Tecuapetla F, Guzman JN, Bargas J, Galarraga E. Presynaptic modulation by somatostatin in the neostriatum. Neurochem Res. 2008;33:1452–1458. [PubMed]
Mallet N, Le Moine C, Charpier S, Gonon F. Feedforward inhibition of projection neurons by fast-spiking GABA interneurons in the rat striatum in vivo. J Neurosci. 2005;25:3857–3869. [PubMed]
Mallet N, Ballion B, Le Moine C, Gonon F. Cortical inputs and GABA interneurons imbalance projection neurons in the striatum of parkinsonian rats. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3875–3884. [PubMed]
Marin O, Anderson SA, Rubenstein JL. Origin and molecular specification of striatal interneurons. J Neurosci. 2000;20:6063–6076. [PubMed]
36. Markram H, Gupta A, Uziel A, Wang Y, Tsodyks M. Information processing with frequency-dependent synaptic connections. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1998;70:101–112. [PubMed]
McBain CJ, Fisahn A. Interneurons unbound. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:11–23. [PubMed]
Mura A, Linder JC, Young SJ, Groves PM. Striatal cells containing aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase: an immunohistochemical comparison with other classes of striatal neurons. Neuroscience. 2000;98:501–511. [PubMed]
Nisenbaum ES, Berger TW. Functionally distinct subpopulations of striatal neurons are differentially regulated by GABAergic and dopaminergic inputs--I. In vivo analysis. Neuroscience. 1992;48:561–578. [PubMed]
O'Donnell P, Grace AA. Cortical afferents modulate striatal gap junction permeability via nitric oxide. Neuroscience. 1997;76:1–5. [PubMed]
Palop JJ, Chin J, Bien-Ly N, Massaro C, Yeung BZ, Yu GQ, Mucke L. Vulnerability of dentate granule cells to disruption of arc expression in human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9686–9693. [PubMed]
Parthasarathy HB, Graybiel AM. Cortically driven immediate-early gene expression reflects modular influence of sensorimotor cortex on identified striatal neurons in the squirrel monkey. J Neurosci. 1997;17:2477–2491. [PubMed]
Ramanathan S, Hanley JJ, Deniau JM, Bolam JP. Synaptic convergence of motor and somatosensory cortical afferents onto GABAergic interneurons in the rat striatum. J Neurosci. 2002;22:8158–8169. [PubMed]
Shuen JA, Chen M, Gloss B, Calakos N. Drd1a-tdTomato BAC transgenic mice for simultaneous visualization of medium spiny neurons in the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2681–2685. [PubMed]
Smith Y, Bevan MD, Shink E, Bolam JP. Microcircuitry of the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia. Neuroscience. 1998;86:353–387. [PubMed]
Steinert JR, Kopp-Scheinpflug C, Baker C, Challiss RA, Mistry R, Haustein MD, Griffin SJ, Tong H, Graham BP, Forsythe ID. Nitric oxide is a volume transmitter regulating postsynaptic excitability at a glutamatergic synapse. Neuron. 2008;60:642–656. [PubMed]
Taverna S, Canciani B, Pennartz CM. Membrane properties and synaptic connectivity of fast-spiking interneurons in rat ventral striatum. Brain Res. 2007;1152:49–56. [PubMed]
Telgkamp P, Raman IM. Depression of inhibitory synaptic transmission between Purkinje cells and neurons of the cerebellar nuclei. J Neurosci. 2002;22:8447–8457. [PubMed]
Tepper JM, Bolam JP. Functional diversity and specificity of neostriatal interneurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:685–692. [PubMed]
Tepper JM, Koos T, Wilson CJ. GABAergic microcircuits in the neostriatum. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:662–669. [PubMed]
Theriault E, Landis DM. Morphology of striatal neurons containing VIP-like immunoreactivity. J Comp Neurol. 1987;256:1–13. [PubMed]
Varela JA, Song S, Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB. Differential depression at excitatory and inhibitory synapses in visual cortex. J Neurosci. 1999;19:4293–4304. [PubMed]
West AR, Grace AA. The nitric oxide-guanylyl cyclase signaling pathway modulates membrane activity States and electrophysiological properties of striatal medium spiny neurons recorded in vivo. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1924–1935. [PubMed]
West AR, Galloway MP, Grace AA. Regulation of striatal dopamine neurotransmission by nitric oxide: effector pathways and signaling mechanisms. Synapse. 2002;44:227–245. [PubMed]
Wilson CJ. The Synaptic Organization of the Brain. (4th Edition) 1998
Wilson CJ. GABAergic inhibition in the neostriatum. Prog Brain Res. 2007;160:91–110. [PubMed]
Wu Y, Parent A. Striatal interneurons expressing calretinin, parvalbumin or NADPH-diaphorase: a comparative study in the rat, monkey and human. Brain Res. 2000;863:182–191. [PubMed]