Several studies using transcriptional profiling have demonstrated the importance of quorum sensing as a global regulator of nitrate metabolism and biofilm formation in
P. aeruginosa (
Schuster et al., 2003;
Wagner et al., 2003;
Wagner et al., 2004). In addition to quorum sensing, anaerobic growth via denitrification in
P. aeruginosa is regulated by Anr (
Ye et al., 1995), an ortholog of Fnr (fumarate and nitrate reductase) in
E. coli (
Sawers, 1991). A consensus Anr sequence TTGACN
4ATCAG (
Spiro & Guest, 1990) and the consensus NarL binding sequence TACc/tNa/cT (
Tyson et al., 1993) are found in the intergenic region between the
narK1K2GHJI membrane-bound nitrate reductase operon and the operon encoding the nitrate sensor-response regulator
narXL. NarXL activation of the membrane nitrate reductase
narK1K2GHJI operon has been reported in both the denitrifying pseudomonad
P. stutzeri (
Hartig et al., 1999) and in
P. aeruginosa (
Schreiber et al., 2007). A third study demonstrated that Anr and NarL act in concert with Integration Host Factor to activate transcription of the
hemA gene, which encodes the first enzyme in heme biosynthesis during anaerobic growth in
P. aeruginosa (
Krieger et al., 2002).
The consensus heptamer binding site for gene activation by NarL (
Tyson et al., 1993) is organized as an inverted repeat separated by two nucleotides, the 7-2-7 motif. However, some variants of this motif are functional in
P. aeruginosa (
Krieger et al., 2002).
In silico analysis of the
P. aeruginosa PAO1 genome using the web-based Regulatory Sequence Analysis-Tools program (RSAT) program (
http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/rsat/) demonstrates that, in addition to the regulatory region of the
narK1K2GHJI operon, only six sites were identified upstream of a predicted coding region with full 7-2-7 NarL consensus binding motif (maximum of one mismatch). One 7-2-7 site identified is the region upstream of
nuoA-N encoding the NADH dehydrogenase complex I, which participates in electron transfer via ubiquinone to the membrane-bound nitrate reductase NarGHI (
Berks et al., 1995;
Zumft, 1997). NADH dehydrogenase complex I is essential for anaerobic growth in
P. aeruginosa (
Filiatrault et al., 2006). NADH dehydrogenase complex I and ubiquinone perform a similar function aerobically by coupling to the electron transport chain of the bacterial cytochrome complex (
Richardson et al., 2001).
In
P. fluorescens,
nuo mutants are deficient in plant root colonization (
Camacho Carvajal et al., 2002), suggesting that NADH dehydrogenase complex I may be involved in aerobic motility and biofilm formation in addition to involvement in anaerobic growth. Transcriptome analysis of a NarX/NarL mutant in
E. coli demonstrated that the
nuo operon is part of the NarL regulon (
Constantinidou et al., 2006). In contrast, over 10% of intergenic regions in
P. aeruginosa PAO1 have at least one consensus NarL half-site (
www.pseudomonas.com). The overall importance of full 7-2-7 to half-site recognition in transcription regulation by NarL in
P. aeruginosa is unknown. However, in the report cited above (
Krieger et al., 2002), mutation of a single NarL heptamer half site in the
P. aeruginosa hemA intergenic region was sufficient to abolish
hemA expression. Recently, Benkert
et al (
Benkert et al., 2008) showed that NarL represses the expression of the arginine fermentation pathway
arcDABC in
P. aeruginosa. Additionally, they identified a heptamer half site for binding by NarL centered at position −56 upstream of
arcDABC rather than the traditional 7-2-7 binding site.
Studies in
E. coli support our conclusion that NarL plays a role in regulation of
P. aeruginosa napEFDABC operon expression. Darwin and Stewart (
Darwin & Stewart, 1995) identified a consensus NarP/NarL binding site upstream of the periplasmic nitrate reductase operon and determined that NarL directly repressed
E. coli napFDAGHBC operon expression (
Potter, 2001;
Stewart et al., 2003). Subsequently, Potter and Cole (
Potter & Cole, 1999) demonstrated that a strain containing a functional periplasmic nitrate reductase, but lacking a functional membrane nitrate reductase response regulator NarL (
napA+narL−), grew better anaerobically than a strain that contained both a functional periplasmic nitrate reductase and NarL (
napA+narL+). The failure of the
narL+nap+ strain to grow well in batch culture was partly attributed to NarL-dependent repression of
nap operon expression by nitrate. Furthermore, the
narGHI− napA+ strain grew better anaerobically under nitrate limiting conditions. In contrast, the
narGHI+ napA− strain grew better in high nitrate concentrations (
Stewart et al., 2002;
Wang et al., 1999). In addition,
E. coli NarL can bind to sites other than the preferential 7-2-7 site (
Darwin & Stewart, 1995;
Darwin et al., 1997) to either promote or repress transcription. The sequences TTACAATTG and TAACCACAC, found upstream of the
nrfA operon in
E. coli at positions −50 and −22, respectively, are single heptamers where NarL can bind and act as a repressor in presence of nitrate (
Darwin et al., 1997;
Darwin, 1996). Dong
et al (
Dong et al., 1992) demonstrated in
E. coli that single base substitutions in these sequences significantly reduced NarL binding.
Regulation of periplasmic nitrate reductase operon
napEFDABC expression by response regulator NarL in
P. aeruginosa has not been widely considered because, to date, NarL has only been shown to be important in the activation of expression of the membrane nitrate reductase
narK1K2GHJI operon (
Schreiber et al., 2007). Unexpectedly, we observed anaerobic growth recovery over time in Δ
narXL. Genetic, transcriptional, and biochemical studies presented here demonstrated that the delayed anaerobic growth recovery in Δ
narXL was attributed to the activity of periplasmic nitrate reductase NapAB. A novel transcriptional start site for
napEFDABC expression was identified in Δ
narXL grown anaerobically. Furthermore, mutagenesis of a consensus NarL-binding half-site upstream of the novel transcriptional start site also restored anaerobic growth recovery in Δ
narXL. Taken together, these data support a model () in which the nitrate response regulator NarL directly represses expression of periplasmic nitrate reductase NapAB, while inducing maximal expression of membrane nitrate reductase NarGHI during anaerobic growth of wild type
P. aeruginosa PAO1.
Studies of
Paracoccus pantotropha and
E. coli suggest why
P. aeruginosa Δ
narXL displayed a delayed growth phenotype even though NapAB expression was induced very early under anaerobic conditions.
P. pantotropha expressing only a functional periplasmic nitrate reductase supported anaerobic respiration and growth on nitrate at levels approximately one-third that of the wild type (
Bell et al., 1993). Also,
E. coli (
Stewart et al., 2002) used periplasmic nitrate reductase and fumarate reductase equally well in the respiratory chain involving glycerol 3-phosphate oxidation. In this case, the fumarate reductase is not a coupling site for generating a proton motive force, suggesting that the periplasmic nitrate reductase is also not a coupling site for generating a proton motive force via quinol oxidation.
When grown under anaerobic conditions,
P. aeruginosa favors expression of the membrane nitrate reductase NarGHI (
Schreiber et al., 2007) since its activity is coupled to energy production (
Berks et al., 1995;
Zumft, 1997). The two component sensor-regulator system NarXL is required for the expression of the membrane nitrate reductase as demonstrated in and shown in (
Schreiber et al., 2007). Hence, Δ
narXL and Δ
narGH show no growth over the first 72 hours of incubation under anaerobic conditions (). However, delayed growth recovery was observed in Δ
narXL but not in Δ
narGH. This phenomenon was due to the expression of the periplasmic nitrate reductase (). The delayed onset of growth by Δ
narXL is likely to be a multifaceted process requiring first the de-repression and expression of the periplasmic nitrate reductase. Even though periplasmic nitrate reductase is expressed as early as 3 hr (
Supplemental Figure 4B), the onset of the delayed growth recovery by Δ
narXL does not occur until approximately 72 hours under anaerobic conditions suggesting that the expression, quantity, and/or functionality of the periplasmic nitrate reductase may be sub-optimal. This may be due in part to a dosage effect which can be overcome by providing the
napEFDABC operon
in trans on a multi-copy plasmid as illustrated in
Supplemental Figure 5 and
Supplemental Figure 2.
Alternatively, the delayed growth recovery observed in Δ
narXL may be due to a threshold of nitrite concentration accumulating that must be met. Because there may be a slow generation of nitrite by Δ
narXL due to the slow conversion of nitrate to nitrite by NapAB, the subsequent induction of the rest of denitrification pathway may be delayed as seen in
Supplemental Figure 3. Maximal nitrite accumulation in wild type PAO1 occurred after 6 hr of anaerobic growth, coinciding with mid-log phase (
Supplemental Figure 3A). Nitrite accumulation in Δ
narXL began at 72 hr and reached a maximum concentration at 111 hr of anaerobic growth, also coinciding with mid-log phase in this mutant. However, following 24 hr pre-adaptation of Δ
narXL in medium supplemented with nitrate and subculture into medium supplemented with nitrite, both wild type PAO1 and Δ
narXL () grew comparably, suggesting that the activity of periplasmic nitrate reductase is the rate limiting step for growth, since the rest of the denitrification pathway is not induced unless an adequate concentration of nitrite is generated. Hence, under normal conditions in wild type
P. aeruginosa PAO1, the shift from aerobic to anaerobic growth prefers membrane nitrate reductase utilization to drive energy metabolism. However in Δ
narXL, a shift from aerobic to anaerobic growth requires the electron transport system to be remodeled because the periplasmic nitrate reductase is not a direct coupling site. Hence,
P. aeruginosa must rely on the remainder of the denitrification pathway and the arginine fermentation pathway for this purpose. (
Eschbach et al., 2004;
Schreiber et al., 2006;
Vander Wauven et al., 1984).