PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of cshperspectCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in BiologyAboutArchiveSubscribeAlerts
 
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 March; 2(3): a000927.
PMCID: PMC2829963

The Isoforms of the p53 Protein

Abstract

p53 is a transcription factor with a key role in the maintenance of genetic stability and therefore preventing cancer formation. It belongs to a family of genes composed of p53, p63, and p73. The p63 and p73 genes have a dual gene structure with an internal promoter in intron-3 and together with alternative splicing, can express 6 and 29 mRNA variants, respectively. Such a complex expression pattern had not been previously described for the p53 gene, which was not consistent with our understanding of the evolution of the p53 gene family. Consequently, we revisited the human p53 gene structure and established that it encodes nine different p53 protein isoforms because of alternative splicing, alternative promoter usage, and alternative initiation sites of translation. Therefore, the human p53 gene family (p53, p63, and p73) has a dual gene structure. We determined that the dual gene structure is conserved in Drosophila and in zebrafish p53 genes. The conservation through evolution of the dual gene structure suggests that the p53 isoforms play an important role in p53 tumor-suppressor activity.

We and others have established that the p53 isoforms can regulate cell-fate outcome in response to stress, by modulating p53 transcriptional activity in a promoter and stress-dependent manner. We have also shown that the p53 isoforms are abnormally expressed in several types of human cancers, suggesting that they play an important role in cancer formation. The determination of p53 isoforms' expression may help to link clinical outcome to p53 status and to improve cancer patient treatment.

p53 was first described in 1979 as a protein that binds to the simian virus (SV40) large T antigen (De Leo et al. 1979; Kress et al. 1979; Lane and Crawford 1979; Linzer and Levine 1979; Melero et al. 1979). The p53 protein is the product of a pivotal tumor-suppressor gene whose inactivation in almost all cancers may not only occur through direct mutation or deletion of the p53 gene itself, but also by disrupting any of the pathways that regulate the p53 protein (Oren 2003). In response to a myriad of stress signals, the p53 protein is activated and thereafter depending on the tissue type and the extent of the cellular damage, triggers adequate cellular response including cell-cycle arrest and programmed cell death (apoptosis) (Vousden and Lane 2007), thus preventing the multiplication of damaged cells that could lead to cancer formation. Hence, p53 has been dubbed “the guardian of the genome” (Lane 1992). The exact mechanism by which p53 exerts its biological functions is still unclear. Up until now, its tumor-suppressor functions are mostly explained by its ability to modulate gene expression. Indeed, p53 is a transcription factor that binds directly and specifically as a tetramer to target sequences of DNA through p53-responsive elements (p53REs) (El-Deiry et al. 1992; Funk et al. 1992; Bourdon et al. 1997) to transactivate several genes involved in p53 tumor-suppressor activities such as p21 (El-Deiry et al. 1993) (cell-cycle arrest), Puma (Nakano and Vousden 2001), and Scotin (Bourdon et al. 2002) (apoptosis). Despite many experimental and genetic evidences in animal models or human diseases, it is still difficult to associate p53 status to clinical outcome and cancer treatment, suggesting that essential features of the p53 pathways are still unknown.

Two p53-related genes, p63 and p73, were first identified in 1997 (Kaghad et al. 1997; Yang et al. 1998). These two proteins share significant structural and functional homologies with p53, particularly in the DNA-binding domain. Indeed, they are capable of transactivating p53-responsive genes, causing cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis. Together with p53, they form a family of transcription factors without being entirely redundant functionally and the primary role of each p53 family member illustrates that each protein has its own unique functions, as revealed by the distinct phenotypes developed by p53, p63, and p73 knockout mice (Murray-Zmijewski et al. 2006).

As a matter of fact, the p63 gene expresses at least three alternatively spliced carboxy-terminal isoforms (α, β, γ). Regarding the p73 gene, at least seven alternatively spliced carboxy-terminal isoforms (α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η) are expressed. Moreover, both p63 and p73 genes can be transcribed from a distal and an internal promoter located in intron-3. The distal promoter leads to the expression of TAp63 and TAp73, respectively, whereas the alternative promoter leads to the expression of isoforms deleted in the amino-terminal domain, ΔNp63 and ΔNp73, respectively. Altogether, the p63 gene expresses six mRNA variants that encode six different p63 protein isoforms, whereas the p73 gene expresses at least 35 mRNA variants that can theoretically encode 28 different p73 protein isoforms, with 14 of them being so far described. In regard to the biological activities of the p63 and p73 isoforms, TAp63 and TAp73 bind to p53REs and induce the expression of p53 target genes through their transactivation domain TA. ΔNp63 and ΔNp73 isoforms can act in a dominant–negative manner toward p53, TAp63, and TAp73 activities (Melino et al. 2003; Benard et al. 2003). The ΔNp63 and ΔNp73 isoforms have been also shown to specifically bind to p53REs and directly activate specific target genes (Dohn et al. 2001; Wu et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2004).

THE DUAL GENE STRUCTURE OF THE p53 FAMILY GENE IS CONSERVED THROUGH EVOLUTION

Mammalian genomes contain three members of the p53 family (p53, p63, and p73), with only one member being identified in invertebrates, suggesting that the mammalian p53 gene family is derived from the triplication of one ancestral gene (Yang et al. 2002). Because of the dual gene structure and the alternative splicing of the p63 and p73 genes, we raised the question of whether the structure of the p53 gene was more complex than it appeared. Using the GeneRacer PCR technique, which allows specific amplification of only capped mRNA, it was possible to determine the transcription initiation sites of the human p53 gene. Consequently, we described that the human p53 gene contains an internal promoter in intron-4, confirming that the p53 gene has a dual gene structure like its homologous genes p63 and p73. Moreover, intron-9 of the p53 mRNA can be spliced in three different ways, leading to the expression of p53 proteins with different carboxy-terminal domains. The intron-2 of human p53 mRNA can also be alternatively spliced, leading to the expression of p53 proteins deleted of the first 40 amino acids (Fig. 1A). Altogether, the human p53 gene can express nine different forms of the p53 protein (p53, p53β, p53γ, Δ133p53, Δ133p53β, Δ133p53γ, Δ40p53, Δ40p53β, and Δ40p53γ), containing different domains of the protein because of alternative splicing, alternative promoter usage, and alternative initiation of translation (Fig. 2A) (Bourdon et al. 2005).

Figure 1.
Schema of the p53 genes of (A) Homo sapiens (human), (B) Danio rerio (zebrafish), and (C) Drosophila. Promoters (P1, P1′, and P2) are indicated as [upward arrow with tip rightwards]. Exons are numbered, noncoding exons are represented by black boxes, and coding exons ...
Figure 2.
Schema of the p53 isoform proteins encoded by Homo sapiens (human) (A), Danio rerio (zebrafish) (B), and Drosophila (C) p53 genes. (TAD) transactivation domain (TAD1 and TAD2); (PrD) proline domain; (NLS) nuclear localization signal; (OD) oligomerization ...

To determine whether the dual p53 gene structure is conserved through evolution, we examined the expression pattern of the Drosophila p53 gene by Generacer PCR on total RNA extracted from Drosophila embryos (Fig. 1C). We then identified three variants of Drosophila p53 mRNA (Fig. 2C). The first variant encodes the dp53L protein 495 (aa) with a large amino-terminal domain containing the transactivation domain FxxψW conserved in p53 proteins of mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, and mollusks. The conservation of the transactivation domain FxxψW defines the dp53L protein as homologous to full-length p53 (FLp53), TAp63, and TAp73 proteins. The second mRNA variant (dp53n) is a splice variant of dp53L, retaining intron-2 and encoding only the first 123 amino acids (dp53n). The third variant (dp53) previously described (Brodsky et al. 2000; Jin et al. 2000; Ollmann et al. 2000) is obtained from an internal promoter located upstream of exon-3 (previously designated as exon-1) and encodes the dp53 protein 385 (aa) deleted of the first 123 aa. Hence, the dp53 protein is an amino terminally truncated isoform produced from an internal promoter, confirming that the dual gene structure of the p53 gene is conserved in Drosophila (Bourdon et al. 2005).

Moreover, Chen et al. have established that the zebrafish p53 gene contains an internal promoter (Fig. 1B), encoding an amino terminally truncated protein (Δ113p53) initiated at codon 113 and homologous to human Δ133p53 (Fig. 2B), confirming that the dual gene structure of the p53 gene is conserved through evolution and suggesting that the internal promoter plays an essential role in p53 gene family activities (Chen et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2009).

ANTIBODIES FOR THE p53 ISOFORMS

To determine the biological activities of the human p53 isoforms, we assessed the specificity of the currently commercially available antibodies for the p53 protein. Table 1 shows the antibodies that we have experimentally tested. As shown in Figure 3, some of the antibodies are either pantropic or recognize only a subset of the p53 isoforms. The mouse monoclonal antibodies DO-1 and DO-7, which share the same epitope, are only specific for FLp53, p53β, and p53γ. Additionally, the mouse monoclonal antibody 1801 allows the detection of all p53 isoforms except Δ133p53 (α, β, and γ), whereas the mouse monoclonal DO-12 is pantropic, because its epitope, localized in the DNA-binding domain (DBD), is common for all of the p53 isoforms. Moreover, the mouse monoclonal antibodies BP53.10, 421, and ICA-9 are specific for the α isoforms of p53 (FLp53, Δ40p53α, and Δ133p53α), because their epitopes are localized in the basic region (BR) of the p53 protein.

Figure 3.
Regions of Homo sapien (human) p53 protein isoforms specifically recognized by p53 antibodies. (A) Epitope map for commercially available p53 antibodies. Epitopes of the mouse monoclonal antibodies DO-1, DO-7, 1801, DO-12, BP53.10, 421, and ICA-9 are ...
Table 1.
Summary of the p53 antibodies recognizing the p53 isoforms

The polyclonal rabbit CM-1 and sheep SAPU antibodies, both raised against recombinant human FLp53, can detect all p53 isoforms. However, CM-1 poorly detects Δ133p53β and Δ133p53γ, as its epitopes are localized in the amino and carboxyl terminus of FLp53. The SAPU antibody has an additional epitope in the DBD, allowing it to detect efficiently all p53 isoforms. However, as the p53 isoforms do not contain all the epitopes of CM-1 and SAPU, it is difficult to assess their relative expression using these antibodies. Only the DO-12 antibody would allow such comparison.

As none of the commercially available antibodies listed previously are capable of identifying specifically each p53 isoform, we raised two novel rabbit polyclonal antibodies, KJC8 and MAP4.9 specific, respectively, for the β isoforms of p53 and the Δ133p53 isoforms.

BIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR ACTIVITIES OF THE p53β AND Δ133p53 ISOFORMS

We were able to show by chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP assay) using the KJC8 antibody and MCF7 cells extract, that endogenous p53β can bind specifically to p53-responsive promoters in a promoter-dependent manner. p53β preferentially binds to the Bax promoter (a proapoptotic gene), but poorly to the Mdm2 promoter (a ubiquitin ligase of the p53 protein), whereas FLp53 preferentially binds to the Mdm2 promoter but poorly to the Bax promoter (Bourdon et al. 2005). By luciferase assay, we determined that p53β enhances p53 transcriptional activity on the Bax promoter but has no effect on the p21 promoter. This effect can be caused by a direct interaction of p53β with p53, because endogenous p53β can form a protein complex with FLp53. However, we and others were unable to coimmunoprecipitate p53β with p53 after transient transfection, suggesting that the interaction between p53 and p53β could involve other protein(s). Recently, we reported that p53β promotes replicative cellular senescence when coexpressed with FLp53 in normal human fibroblasts by increasing p53-dependent induction of p21 expression (Fujita et al. 2009). Altogether, the results suggest that p53β is a modulator of p53 tumor-suppressor activity by modulating p53 transcriptional activity and thus switching cell fate outcome.

Regarding the Δ133p53 isoform, we have shown that ectopic expression of Δ133p53 inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis after transient transfection in H1299 cells. By luciferase assay, we determined that co-transfection of Δ133p53 isoform with FLp53 inhibits p53 transcriptional activity on the Bax promoter and p21 promoter. Furthermore, we established by coimmunoprecipitation assay that Δ133p53 can form a protein complex with FLp53. Therefore, it is likely that Δ133p53 inhibits p53 transcriptional activity by direct interaction with FLp53. Consistent with this, we recently reported that expression of Δ133p53 isoform inhibits replicative senescence and promotes cellular proliferation of normal human fibroblasts by modulating p53 transcriptional activity (Fujita et al. 2009). To determine the biological activity of Δ133p53 at physiological level, we took advantage of the zebrafish animal model and established that Δ113p53, the zebrafish counterpart of human Δ133p53, is induced in a p53-dependent manner in response to embryo development defects or ionizing radiation. Importantly, specific repression of endogenous Δ113p53 by injection of morpholino RNA into zebrafish embryos sensitizes embryos to p53-mediated apoptosis, promoted by ionizing radiation or embryo development defects. Interestingly, injection of Δ113p53 mRNA into zebrafish embryos modulates p53-transcriptional activity and prevents apoptosis by inducing BclxL expression, suggesting that Δ113p53 does not act exclusively in a dominant–negative manner toward p53 but rather modulates p53 target gene expression in a promoter and stress-dependent manner (Chen et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2009).

Altogether, the results clearly show that the Δ113p53 isoform has a biological relevance at physiological level in zebrafish embryos by preventing p53-mediated apoptosis. However, it remains to be investigated whether human Δ133p53 has a biological relevance at physiological level in mammalian animal models and in human cells.

Based on the current data, we propose that some p53 isoforms can modulate p53 transcriptional activity. However, it is worth noting that the p53 isoforms may have biological activities independent of p53 and also that they may be involved in p53-dependent but transcriptionally independent activities. Further investigation will be required to decipher p53 isoforms' biological and biochemical activities.

REGULATION OF p53 ISOFORMS' EXPRESSION

The human p53 splice variants and the internal promoter-initiated products are expressed in a wide range of normal tissues in a tissue-dependent manner, suggesting that the internal promoter and the splicing of p53 can be regulated. Moreover, p53 protein isoforms have different subcellular localizations, suggesting that each p53 isoform can have different biological activities (Bourdon et al. 2005). Immunofluorescence experiments of the p53 isoforms revealed that Δ133p53 and p53β are mainly localized in the nucleus with a minor staining in the cytoplasm. Additionally, p53γ was found to be localized in the nucleus in most cells and in the cytoplasm in some others, suggesting that p53γ could be shuttling between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and that its subcellular localization can be regulated. Furthermore, Δ133p53β protein was seen in the nucleus and the cytoplasm in most cells, with 10% of cells revealing the formation of Δ133p53β foci in the nucleus. Interestingly, whereas Δ133p53β and Δ133p53γ isoforms differ only by the last 15 carboxy-terminal amino acids, Δ133p53γ is exclusively localized in the cytoplasm, indicating that the carboxy-terminal amino acids can modify the subcellular localization of these isoforms.

Altogether, the results suggest that the activities of the p53 isoforms can be regulated by altering the p53 internal promoter activity, the splicing of p53 mRNA, and the subcellular localization of the p53 isoforms.

THE p53 ISOFORMS AND CANCER

In light of these results, we and others have analyzed the expression of the p53 isoforms in different types of human breast cancer, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), head and neck tumors (SCCHN), melanoma, ovarian tumors, renal cell carcinoma, and colon tumors (Bourdon et al. 2005; Anensen et al. 2006; Boldrup et al. 2007; Avery-Kiejda et al. 2008; Marabese et al. 2008; Song et al. 2009). Abnormal expression of the p53 isoforms has been reported in head and neck tumors as well as in ovarian tumors (Boldrup et al. 2007; Marabese et al. 2008). Concerning breast tissue, normal breast tissue expresses p53, p53β, and p53γ but not the other p53 isoforms. Only 25% of tumors present a mutation of the p53 gene, suggesting that p53 and its pathway are inactivated by other mechanisms. We reported in 30 randomly selected primary breast tumors that 60% of the cases have lost the expression of p53β and p53γ, whereas 40% of them have gained the expression of Δ133p53. Importantly, the p53 isoforms are differentially expressed compared with normal breast tissue and from tumor to tumor (Bourdon et al. 2005). Further clinical studies on a larger number of breast tumors will be necessary to determine the association of the expression of the p53 isoforms with clinical outcome and clinical markers. However, as the p53 isoforms can inhibit or enhance p53 tumor-suppressor activity, it suggests that abnormal expression of the p53 isoforms can account for a loss of p53 tumor-suppressor activity in breast tumors.

In AML, only 10% of the cases present a mutation of the p53 gene, suggesting here also that p53 tumor-suppressor activity is inhibited by other mechanisms. Anensen et al. reported an abnormal expression of the p53 isoforms, both at the mRNA and the protein levels in AML (Anensen et al. 2006). In their report, they described a rapid shift from short forms toward long forms of p53 proteins in blood samples of AML patients within 4 hours of chemotherapy, using RT-PCR and two-dimensional immunoblots. This observation indicates that the expression of the p53 protein isoforms could be modulated in vivo in response to chemotherapy. Moreover, they noticed that the expression of the p53 protein isoforms did not change in response to chemotherapy in patients who did not respond to treatment, suggesting that the p53 isoforms could be associated with AML patient survival. The analysis of the expression of the p53 isoforms in relation to patient survival should be performed on a larger cohort of AML patients from several hospitals to confirm this hypothesis.

In melanoma cell lines and primary tumors, p53β and Δ40p53 were reported to be expressed at the mRNA level in the majority of melanoma cell lines but were undetectable in fibroblasts and melanocytes, suggesting that they can play a role in melanoma development (Avery-Kiejda et al. 2008). Additionally, p53β and other short forms of p53 could be detected at the protein level by Western blot in several melanoma cell lines. The authors reported that the p53 isoforms are differentially localized in the melanoma cell nucleus and the cytosol in a cell-line-dependent manner and that the protein expression levels of the p53 isoforms could be modulated in response to cisplatin treatment. This could explain the differences in the expression of p53 target genes in melanoma cell lines in response to cisplatin.

Another recent report analyzed the patterns of expression of the p53 isoforms in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), both at the mRNA and protein levels in relation to clinical markers (Song et al. 2009). The specimens of tumor and clinically normal tissue adjacent to them were collected from 41 patients with RCC. p53 isoform mRNA were detected by RT-PCR followed by nested PCR and protein expression levels were analyzed by immunohistochemisty and Western blotting. All p53 isoforms (p53, p53β, p53γ, Δ133p53α, Δ133p53β, and Δ133p53γ) could be detected in tumors and normal tissue, with the exception of the Δ133p53β isoform, which was not detected in normal tissue. Although nested PCR results consistently revealed the expression of p53γ, Δ133p53α, Δ133p53β, and Δ133p53γ in tumors, only p53β mRNA was significantly overexpressed in tumor samples, and was associated with tumor stage, suggesting that p53β plays an important role in the formation of RCC and can be used as a new biomarker for RCC. Moreover, as all p53 isoforms are differentially expressed in RCC, it suggests that their function in tumor development or progression might be different.

Furthermore, Fujita et al. have recently investigated the role of endogenous Δ133p53 and p53β on replicative senescence (Fujita et al. 2009). They determined that Δ133p53 inhibits senescence, whereas p53β promotes senescence in normal human fibroblasts. They analyzed the expression of Δ133p53 and p53β in a cohort of colon adenomas and carcinomas. They reported that the colon adenoma with senescent phenotype is associated in vivo with the expression pattern of the p53 isoforms. However, the increased Δ133p53 and decreased p53β isoform expression found in colon carcinomas may signal an escape from the senescence barrier during the progression from adenoma to carcinoma.

In conclusion, many clinical studies report the expression of the p53 isoforms in several types of cancer, confirming that the p53 isoforms are expressed both at the mRNA and protein levels. Moreover, the abnormal expression of the p53 isoforms in different cancer types suggests that their differential expression may disrupt the p53 response and contribute to tumor formation. Furthermore, it may provide an explanation to the difficulties in many clinical studies to link p53 status to cancer prognosis and treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Marie P. Khoury is supported by Inserm (Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale) and Jean-Christophe Bourdon is supported by Cancer-Research UK. The authors wish to thank Drs. Mark Saville and Kenneth Fernandes for their constructive discussions.

Footnotes

Editors: Arnold J. Levine and David Lane

Additional Perspectives on The p53 Family available at www.cshperspectives.org

REFERENCES

  • Anensen N, Oyan AM, Bourdon JC, Kalland KH, Bruserud O, Gjertsen BT 2006. A distinct p53 protein isoform signature reflects the onset of induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 12:3985–3992 [PubMed]
  • Avery-Kiejda KA, Zhang XD, Adams LJ, Scott RJ, Vojtesek B, Lane DP, Hersey P 2008. Small molecular weight variants of p53 are expressed in human melanoma cells and are induced by the DNA-damaging agent cisplatin. Clin Cancer Res 14:1659–1668 Epub 2008 Feb 1629 [PubMed]
  • Bénard J, Douc-Rasy S, Ahomadegbe JC 2003. TP53 family members and human cancers. Hum Mutat 21:182–191 [PubMed]
  • Boldrup L, Bourdon JC, Coates PJ, Sjostrom B, Nylander K 2007. Expression of p53 isoforms in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer 43:617–623 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bourdon JC, Deguin-Chambon V, Lelong JC, Dessen P, May P, Debuire B, May E 1997. Further characterisation of the p53 responsive element–identification of new candidate genes for trans-activation by p53. Oncogene 14:85–94 [PubMed]
  • Bourdon JC, Fernandes K, Murray-Zmijewski F, Liu G, Diot A, Xirodimas DP, Saville MK, Lane DP 2005. p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity. Genes Dev 19:2122–2137 [PubMed]
  • Bourdon JC, Renzing J, Robertson PL, Fernandes KN, Lane DP 2002. Scotin, a novel p53-inducible proapoptotic protein located in the ER and the nuclear membrane. J Cell Biol 158:235–246 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brodsky MH, Nordstrom W, Tsang G, Kwan E, Rubin GM, Abrams JM 2000. Drosophila p53 binds a damage response element at the reaper locus. Cell 101:103–113 [PubMed]
  • Chen J, Ng SM, Chang C, Zhang Z, Bourdon JC, Lane DP, Peng J 2009. p53 isoform Δ113p53 is a p53 target gene that antagonizes p53 apoptotic activity via BclxL activation in zebrafish. Genes Dev 23:278–290 [PubMed]
  • Chen J, Ruan H, Ng SM, Gao C, Soo HM, Wu W, Zhang Z, Wen Z, Lane DP, Peng J 2005. Loss of function of def selectively up-regulates Δ113p53 expression to arrest expansion growth of digestive organs in zebrafish. Genes Dev 19:2900–2911 [PubMed]
  • De Leo AB, Jay G, Appella E, Dubois GC, Law LW, Old LJ 1979. Detection of a transformation-related antigen in chemically induced sarcomas and other transformed cells of the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76:2420–2424 [PubMed]
  • Dohn M, Zhang S, Chen X 2001. p63α and ΔNp63α can induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and differentially regulate p53 target genes. Oncogene 20:3193–3205 [PubMed]
  • El-Deiry WS, Kern SE, Pietenpol JA, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B 1992. Definition of a consensus binding site for p53. Nat Genet 1:45–49 [PubMed]
  • El-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B 1993. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75:817–825 [PubMed]
  • Fujita K, Mondal AM, Horikawa I, Nguyen GH, Kumamoto K, Sohn JJ, Bowman ED, Mathe EA, Schetter AJ, Pine SR, et al. 2009. p53 isoforms, Δ133p53 and p53β, are endogenous regulators of replicative cellular senescence. Nat Cell Biol 11:1135–1142 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Funk WD, Pak DT, Karas RH, Wright WE, Shay JW 1992. A transcriptionally active DNA-binding site for human p53 protein complexes. Mol Cell Biol 12:2866–2871 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jin S, Martinek S, Joo WS, Wortman JR, Mirkovic N, Sali A, Yandell MD, Pavletich NP, Young MW, Levine AJ 2000. Identification and characterization of a p53 homologue in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:7301–7306 [PubMed]
  • Kaghad M, Bonnet H, Yang A, Creancier L, Biscan JC, Valent A, Minty A, Chalon P, Lelias JM, Dumont X et al. 1997. Monoallelically expressed gene related to p53 at 1p36, a region frequently deleted in neuroblastoma and other human cancers. Cell 90:809–819 [PubMed]
  • Kress M, May E, Cassingena R, May P 1979. Simian virus 40-transformed cells express new species of proteins precipitable by anti-simian virus 40 tumor serum. J Virol 31:472–483 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lane DP 1992. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome [news; comment] [see comments]. Nature 358:15–16 [PubMed]
  • Lane DP, Crawford LV 1979. T antigen is bound to a host protein in SV40-transformed cells. Nature 278:261–263 [PubMed]
  • Linzer DIH, Levine AJ 1979. Characterization of a 54 K dalton cellular SV40 tumor antigen present in SV40-transformed cells and in infected embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell 1:43–52 [PubMed]
  • Liu G, Nozell S, Xiao H, Chen X 2004. ΔNp73β is active in transactivation and growth suppression. Mol Cell Biol 24:487–501 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marabese M, Marchini S, Marrazzo E, Mariani P, Cattaneo D, Fossati R, Compagnoni A, Signorelli M, Moll UM, Codegoni AM et al. 2008. Expression levels of p53 and p73 isoforms in stage I and stage III ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 44:131–141 [PubMed]
  • Melero JA, Stitt DT, Mangel WF, Carroll RB 1979. Identification of new polypeptide species 48–55K) immunoprecipitable by antiserum to purified large T antigen and present in simian virus 40-infected and transformed cells. J Virol 93:466–480 [PubMed]
  • Melino G, Lu X, Gasco M, Crook T, Knight RA 2003. Functional regulation of p73 and p63: development and cancer. Trends Biochem Sci 28:663–670 [PubMed]
  • Murray-Zmijewski F, Lane DP, Bourdon JC 2006. p53/p63/p73 isoforms: An orchestra of isoforms to harmonise cell differentiation and response to stress. Cell Death Differ 13:962–972 [PubMed]
  • Nakano K, Vousden KH 2001. PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Mol Cell 7:683–694 [PubMed]
  • Ollmann M, Young LM, Di Como CJ, Karim F, Belvin M, Robertson S, Whittaker K, Demsky M, Fisher WW, Buchman A et al. 2000. Drosophila p53 is a structural and functional homolog of the tumor suppressor p53. Cell 101:91–101 [PubMed]
  • Oren M 2003. Decision making by p53: Life, death and cancer. Cell Death Differ 10:431–442 [PubMed]
  • Rohaly G, Chemnitz J, Dehde S, Nunez AM, Heukeshoven J, Deppert W, Dornreiter I 2005. A novel human p53 isoform is an essential element of the ATR-intra-S phase checkpoint. Cell 122:21–32 [PubMed]
  • Song W, Huo SW, Lu JJ, Liu Z, Fang XL, Jin XB, Yuan MZ 2009. Expression of p53 isoforms in renal cell carcinoma. Chin Med J Engl 122:921–926 [PubMed]
  • Vousden KH, Lane DP 2007. p53 in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:275–283 [PubMed]
  • Wu G, Nomoto S, Hoque MO, Dracheva T, Osada M, Lee CC, Dong SM, Guo Z, Benoit N, Cohen Y et al. 2003. ΔNp63α and TAp63α regulate transcription of genes with distinct biological functions in cancer and development. Cancer Res 63:2351–2357 [PubMed]
  • Yang A, Kaghad M, Wang Y, Gillett E, Fleming MD, Dotsch V, Andrews NC, Caput D, McKeon F 1998. p63, a p53 homolog at 3q27–29, encodes multiple products with transactivating, death-inducing, and dominant-negative activities. Mol Cell 2:305–316 [PubMed]
  • Yang A, Kaghad M, Caput D, McKeon F 2002. On the shoulders of giants: p63, p73 and the rise of p53. Trends Genet 18:90–95 [PubMed]

Articles from Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press