PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Addict Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Feb 24, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2828493
NIHMSID: NIHMS174682
FOSB proteins in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices of human alcoholics
Hiroyuki Watanabe,1 Richard Henriksson,1,2 Yoshinori N. Ohnishi,3 Yoko H. Ohnishi,3 Clive Harper,4 Donna Sheedy,4 Therese Garrick,4 Fred Nyberg,1 Eric J. Nestler,3 Georgy Bakalkin,1 and Tatjana Yakovleva1
1Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
2Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
3Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA
4Discipline of Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Correspondence to: Georgy Bakalkin, Department of Biological Dependence Research, Institution of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Husargatan 3, Uppsala University, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden. georgy.bakalkin/at/farmbio.uu.se
The transcription factor ΔFosB is accumulated in the addiction circuitry, including the orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal cortices of rodents chronically exposed to ethanol or other drugs of abuse, and has been suggested to play a direct role in addiction maintenance. To address this hypothesis in the context of substance dependence in humans, we compared the immunoreactivities of FOSB proteins in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (OFC and DLPFC respectively) between controls and alcoholics using semiquantitative immunoblotting. In both structures, we detected three forms of FOSB, one of which was ΔFOSB, but in neither case did their immunoreactivities differ between the groups. Our results indicate that the ΔFOSB immunoreactivity in the human brain is very low, and that it is not accumulated in the OFC and DLPFC of human alcoholics, suggesting that it may not be directly involved in addiction maintenance, at least not in ethanol dependence.
Keywords: Alcoholics, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ethanol dependence, ΔFOSB, FOSB, orbitofrontal cortex
The transcription factor ΔFosB, an unusually stable, C-terminally truncated variant of the immediate early gene product FosB is thought to function as a sustained molecular switch for addiction (Nestler, Barrot & Self 2001). Chronic exposure of rodents to most drugs of abuse, including cocaine, morphine, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and ethanol, causes ΔFosB to accumulate in the addiction circuitry (Perrotti et al. 2008), wherein it has been suggested to regulate the expression of several genes commonly associated with this disease (McClung & Nestler 2003). ΔFosB is thought to be directly involved in addiction maintenance by: (1) enhancing the rewarding and incentive motivational properties of drugs of abuse via its actions in the nucleus accumbens (Nestler 2008); and (2) producing tolerance to the cognitive-disrupting effects of such drugs via its actions in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Nestler 2008). However, to date there has been no attempt to address this hypothesis in the context of substance dependence in humans. To do so, we compared the immunoreactivities of FOSB proteins in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (OFC and DLPFC, respectively) between human controls and alcoholics using semiquantitative immunoblotting. These two prefrontal cortical subregions are both key parts of the addiction circuitry (Volkow & Fowler 2000; Goldstein & Volkow 2002), and chronic exposure of rats to ethanol or other drugs of abuse has been shown to result in accumulation of ΔFosB in their rodent equivalents, i.e. the OFC and medial prefrontal cortex (Perrotti et al. 2008; Winstanley et al. 2007).
Subjects
This study was approved by Stockholm's ethic vetting board. Postmortem samples from the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, Brodmann's areas 47 and 9, respectively, of 15 human controls and 15 alcoholics were obtained from the New South Wales Tissue Resource Center. Cases were collected by qualified pathologists under full ethical clearance and with informed, written consent from the next of kin. All subjects were male and Caucasian. Alcoholics drank ≥ 80 g of ethanol per day in average, met DSM-IV criteria, did not have Wernicke–Korsakoff's syndrome or liver cirrhosis and had no history of poly drug abuse. Controls had no history of drug abuse. Individual demographic and clinical data for all subjects are given in supporting information Table S1.
Cell culturing and transfection
Human HeLa carcinoma cells were grown in Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Media, supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2. Mouse FosB and ΔFosB cDNAs were subcloned into the mammalian expression vectors pcDNA™3.1 / Hygro (+) and pcDNA™3.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), respectively, to generate the plasmids YOF235 and YOF254. Transfections were carried out using Lipofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mock-transfected cells were used as negative controls.
Immunoblotting
Cell and tissue extracts were prepared by solubilization of pelleted cells and powdered tissue, respectively, in SDS buffer, and sonication. DC assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used for determination of protein concentration. Cell and tissue homogenates were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10% Tricine gels. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany) and stained with MemCode (Pierce, Rockford, IL). All blots were made in duplicates, probed with the following antibodies: rabbit polyclonal anti-FosB (cat. # sc-48, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:200; mouse monoclonal anti-FOSB (cat. # ab11959, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 1:500; and mouse monoclonal anti-FOSB (cat. # LS-C528, Lifespan, Seattle, WA) at 1:333; and incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (cat. # 170-6515 and 170-6516, Bio-Rad) at 1:25000. sc-48 was blocked by preincubation with 10−7 M of blocking peptide (cat. # sc-48 P, Santa Cruz). Blots were developed in Amersham's Enhanced Chemiluminescence System (Amersham, Little Chalfont, UK). Films were digitized using a scanner. Densitometric analysis was performed in Image Gauge (V3.12) (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). To enable data normalization, reference samples consisting of pooled OFC tissue extracts from all subjects were loaded onto three wells: the second from the left and right edge, respectively, and the middle one. Protein optical densities (ODs) were expressed as ratio to MemCode™ OD.
Statistical analysis
Data normality was examined with Shapiro-Wilk's test. Depending thereon, group differences were investigated either with Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Likewise, correlations of protein immunoreactivities with age, postmortem interval (PMI), brain pH and storage time were examined either with Pearson's correlation or Spearman's rank correlation. Covariate influence was assessed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Significance was set to P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed in Statistica (V8.0) (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK).
We tested three commercially available antibodies out of which only sc-48 (Santa Cruz) could be reliably used to detect FOSB proteins in the human OFC (Fig. 1a–c). In HeLa cells ectopically expressing either FosB or ΔFosB, this polyclonal antibody detected three FosB proteins of molecular weights, 46, 41 and 39 kDa, and three ΔFosB proteins of molecular weights, 37, 30 and 27 kDa. Out of these six, three could be detected in the human brain, namely the 46 and 39 kDa forms of FOSB and the 37 kDa form of ΔFOSB. The immunoreactivities of the latter two proteins were low and very low, respectively (Fig. 1e), but all three could be quantified. The mode of quantification has been described elsewhere (but see also Fig. 1d–f) (Henriksson et al. 2008). OD values outside of the linear ranges of detection were excluded, i.e. those of the 37 kDa form of ΔFOSB in the DLPFC of seven controls and eight alcoholics.
Figure 1
Figure 1
FOSB proteins in the human orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (OFC and DLPFC, respectively). (a) Schematic picture of FosB and ΔFosB. The epitopes recognized by the three different antibodies tested are depicted. (b) Immunoblots (more ...)
In neither case did the protein immunoreactivities in the OFC and DLPFC differ significantly between controls and alcoholics (Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, P > 0.05 in all cases) (Fig. 1f). The 39 kDa form of FOSB and the 37 kDa form of ΔFOSB in the OFC correlated significantly with PMI (Spearman's rank correlation, Spearman's R = −0.5, P < 0.01 in both cases). No other significant correlations were found (Pearson's or Spearman's rank correlation, P > 0.05 in all cases). In the cases of the 39 kDa form of FOSB and the 37 kDa form of ΔFOSB in the OFC, there were no significant differences between controls and alcoholics when the variance introduced by PMI was accounted for (ANCOVA, F1,27 = 2, P > 0.05 in both cases). Moreover, nicotine abuse and apparent benzodiazepine use had no influence on the protein immunoreactivities as was evident from subgroup analysis of smokers and exclusion analysis, respectively (Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, P > 0.05 in all cases).
The absence of significant differences in the immunoreactivities of the 46 and 39 kDa forms of FOSB in the OFC and DLPFC between human controls and alcoholics are consistent with animal data showing that these forms of FosB are not accumulated in the addiction circuitry following repeated drug treatment (Nestler et al. 2001). Partially unexpected, though, were the very low immunoreactivities of the 37 kDa form of ΔFOSB detected therein; very low immunoreactivities of this form of ΔFosB are detected in the PFC of control rats, however, we would have expected much higher immunoreactivities thereof after chronic ethanol exposure (Perrotti et al. 2008). Attention was given to potential confounders, i.e. age, PMI, brain pH, storage time, smoking history and apparent benzodiazepine use, neither of which were found to interfere with the interpretation of our results. However, precaution is warranted in this regard, e.g. due to sample size and heterogeneity, and the inherent uncertainty of single observations. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the 37 kDa form of ΔFOSB is not accumulated in the PFC of human alcoholics, suggesting that it may not be directly involved in addiction maintenance, at least not in ethanol dependence.
Supplementary Material
Suppl Table
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by grants from AFA Försäkring, Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Alcohol Retail Monopoly, the Swedish Research Council, the National Drug Policy Coordinator, the Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg Foundations and Uppsala University. The Australian Brain Donor Programs New South Wales Tissue Resource Centre was supported by the University of Sydney, the National Health and Medical Research Council, the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and the New South Wales Department of Health.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:
Table S1 Individual demographic and clinical data.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
  • Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1642–1652. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Henriksson R, Kuzmin A, Okvist A, Harper C, Sheedy D, Garrick T, Yakovleva T, Bakalkin G. Elevated synaptophysin I in the prefrontal cortex of human chronic alcoholics. Synapse. 2008;62:829–833. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McClung CA, Nestler EJ. Regulation of gene expression and cocaine reward by CREB and DeltaFosB. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1208–1215. [PubMed]
  • Nestler EJ. Review. Transcriptional mechanisms of addiction: role of DeltaFosB. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:3245–3255. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nestler EJ, Barrot M, Self DW. DeltaFosB: a sustained molecular switch for addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11042–11046. [PubMed]
  • Perrotti LI, Weaver RR, Robison B, Renthal W, Maze I, Yazdani S, Elmore RG, Knapp DJ, Selley DE, Martin BR, Sim-Selley L, Bachtell RK, Self DW, Nestler EJ. Distinct patterns of DeltaFosB induction in brain by drugs of abuse. Synapse. 2008;62:358–369. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Volkow ND, Fowler JS. Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:318–325. [PubMed]
  • Winstanley CA, Laplant Q, Theobald DE, Green TA, Bachtell RK, Perrotti LI, Dileone RJ, Russo SJ, Garth WJ, Self DW, Nestler EJ. DeltaFosB induction in orbitofrontal cortex mediates tolerance to cocaine-induced cognitive dysfunction. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10497–10507. [PubMed]