PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcinvestThe Journal of Clinical InvestigationCurrent IssueArchiveSubscriptionAbout the Journal
 
J Clin Invest. 2010 March 1; 120(3): 650–653.
Published online 2010 February 22. doi:  10.1172/JCI42338
PMCID: PMC2827969

New horizons for studying human hepatotropic infections

Abstract

The liver serves as a target organ for several important pathogens, including hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV, respectively) and the human malaria parasites, all of which represent serious global health problems. Because these pathogens are restricted to human hepatocytes, research in small animals has been compromised by the frailty of the current mouse xenotransplantation models. In this issue of the JCI, Bissig et al. demonstrate robust HBV and HCV infection in a novel xenotransplantation model in which large numbers of immunodeficient mice with liver injury were engrafted with significant quantities of human hepatocytes. This technical advance paves the way for more widespread use of human liver chimeric mice and forms the basis for creating increasingly complex humanized mouse models that could prove useful for studying immunopathogenesis and vaccine development against hepatotropic pathogens.

More than 800 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV, respectively) and malaria, causing over 1.5 million deaths annually (1, 2). Persistent HBV and HCV infections can lead to cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Basic research, as well as the development of drugs and vaccines targeting human hepatotropic pathogens, has been handicapped by the lack of robust in vitro and in vivo platforms that mimic human liver biology and disease susceptibility. The narrow species tropism of HBV and HCV restricts preclinical studies to chimpanzees or human liver–chimeric mice. Large primate studies are often limited by financial and ethical concerns, and humanized mice are currently cumbersome and low-throughput. In culture, HCC-derived cell lines and immortalized hepatocytes have been useful for studying various aspects of HBV and HCV life cycles, but these cells differ phenotypically and functionally from human hepatocytes in vivo. Primary hepatocytes, which can be coaxed to maintain liver-specific functions by culture with fibroblasts, hold promise as a more physiologically relevant in vitro substrate for HCV infection (3). Addressing fundamental questions about hepatotropic pathogen biology in vivo, however, requires a suitable small animal model to complement and guide more challenging and expensive studies, including clinical trials.

Human liver–chimeric mouse models for human hepatotropic infections

Currently, the most advanced in vivo systems for modeling human hepatotropic infectious disease are human liver–chimeric mice. A high degree of chimerism (up to 99%) can be achieved by transplanting human hepatocytes into immunodeficient mice in which liver injury has been induced to ablate the endogenous murine hepatocytes (Figure (Figure1).1). The best-characterized model to date is the immunodeficient urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) mouse, in which an albumin (Alb) promoter directs high-level toxic expression of uPA (Alb-uPA mice) (4, 5). The hepatotoxicity creates a permissive environment for the expansion of functional, transgene-free human hepatocytes. Human liver–chimeric immunodeficient Alb-uPA mice are susceptible to hepatotropic human pathogens (4, 5) and have been used in studies ranging from viral evolution to preclinical testing of antiviral compounds (6, 7). Working with the Alb-uPA model, however, poses serious challenges (Table (Table1).1). The selective pressure needed to achieve and maintain a high level of human chimerism can only be achieved in homozygous Alb-uPA immunodeficient recipients, which suffer from infertility. Therefore large, costly, hemizygous breeder cohorts, or rescue of breeder pairs by transplantation with normal hepatocytes, is required to propagate these mice (8). The severe liver injury of homozygous Alb-uPA immunodeficient pups necessitates engraftment surgery in the first weeks of life — a procedure that is complicated by the susceptibility of these animals to fatal hemorrhaging (9). Because of these factors, along with the need for high-quality adult human hepatocytes, only modest numbers of experimental mice can be generated, and at great expense.

Figure 1
Creation and future improvements of human liver–chimeric FRG mice.
Table 1
Comparison between FRG mice and immunodeficient Alb-uPA human liver–chimeric mice

To overcome some of these challenges, alternative liver injury models have been developed, including a less toxic Alb-uPA line (10), mice characterized by inducible uPA transgene expression (11), or mice in which the major urinary protein (MUP) promoter is used to delay uPA expression (12). Recently, two groups have reported successful engraftment of human hepatocytes into fumaryl acetoacetate hydrolase–deficient (FAH-deficient) mice bred with mice of a Rag2–/–Il2rgnull immunodeficient background (FRG mice) (13, 14) (Table (Table1).1). FAH is the last enzyme in the tyrosine breakdown pathway (Figure (Figure2),2), and its deficiency leads to lethal type 1 hypertyrosinemia in humans and liver failure in mice. Treatment with 2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzyol)-cyclohexane-1,3-dione (NTBC) prevents the accumulation of toxic metabolites and hepatotoxicity (15), allowing liver injury to be induced at will by withdrawal of the drug.

Figure 2
Tyrosine metabolic pathway affected by FAH deficiency, and the step in this pathway that is inhibited by NTBC.

Using mice of the FRG background, Bissig et al. report consistently high, on average 42%, human liver chimerism after transplantation of human adult hepatocytes (Table (Table1)1) (16). The trick to achieving this high chimerism seems to be the use of 3–5 times more human adult hepatocytes than in previous studies (13, 14). The impressively large number of successfully transplanted animals revealed a clear correlation between the level of chimerism and human serum albumin — providing a convenient, minimally invasive test to monitor engraftment (16). The authors then tested whether the engrafted animals were susceptible to HBV and HCV infection. Similar to previous studies with immunodeficient Alb-uPA mice (5, 17), FRG mice were shown to be susceptible to HBV infection, irrespective of the level of human chimerism. Hallmarks of viral replication, including the presence of serum HBV DNA, covalently closed circular HBV DNA, and HBV core antigen in liver tissue, were readily observed. In contrast, successful HCV infection could only be achieved if more than 10% of hepatocytes were of human origin, again in line with previous observations in immunodeficient Alb-uPA mice (4, 5). Interestingly, above this 10% threshold of chimerism, no clear correlation between hepatocyte engraftment levels and serum viremia was observed. One can only speculate as to why HCV requires substantially higher human chimerism — the short in vivo half-life of the virus may require rapid uptake by new permissive target cells, or successful propagation may necessitate densities of human hepatocytes sufficient for cell-to-cell spread. Importantly, HCV infection could be initiated using cell culture–grown or patient-derived virus, with the highest viremia level achieved using a patient-derived isolate. Furthermore, HCV antigens could be detected in the livers of infected animals, traditionally a highly technically difficult achievement (18).

Potential of human liver–chimeric mice in preclinical drug development

The susceptibility of humanized FRG mice to hepatotropic infections holds promise for preclinical drug efficacy testing. The authors demonstrate a modest decrease in HBV viremia after short-term treatment with the reverse transcriptase inhibitor adefovir dipivoxil, similar to the slow kinetics of viral decline seen in humans treated with this drug (16). For HCV, the current treatment is pegylated IFN-α (peg-IFN) and ribavirin, a combination therapy that is often poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. Several drug candidates targeting viral and host proteins are in preclinical or clinical development, and a major question is whether the virus can be eliminated using solely a cocktail of specific antivirals. Identification of the most effective drug combinations, and the ability to monitor resistance, is an area where model animals could have great utility. Bissig et al. show that a combination of peg-IFN and Debio 025 — an HCV inhibitor targeting the host factor cyclophilin A — is as effective as peg-IFN plus ribavirin over a short-term treatment period. Overall, the results of the Bissig et al. study recapitulate many aspects of HBV and HCV infection in humans, illustrating the promise of this new model for basic studies of human hepatitis viruses and preclinical drug efficacy assessments.

The next steps

The development of more robust human liver–chimeric mice is an important step forward, but further refinements are needed. Despite prolonged high viremia, none of the commonly observed sequelae associated with HBV or HCV infections in humans, namely fibrosis or HCC, were observed in the current study (16). (Patho)physiological processes may require crosstalk between hepatocytes and other liver-resident cells, and, while human hepatocytes are abundant in highly engrafted chimeric mice, non-parenchymal cells are of murine-recipient origin. Kupffer cells and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, for example, appear to be critical to the ability of Plasmodium sporozoites (the transmission form of the malaria parasite) to infect the liver, as permissive hepatocytes are not directly accessible to the sporozoites (19). While infection of human liver–chimeric mice with virulent and live-attenuated Plasmodium species has been reported (20, 21), infection frequencies were low and may in the future possibly be improved by addition of other human non-parenchymal liver cell subsets.

Another obvious caveat of the current human liver–chimeric models is their immunodeficient background. Chronic inflammation is thought to be a major contributor to fibrosis during persistent HBV and HCV infection. Thus, dual engraftment of these animals, resulting in a human liver and a human immune system, is not only critical to monitor immune responses to infection, but also to more faithfully mimic disease pathogenesis (22). Furthermore, since viral hepatitis has become the leading morbidity in HIV-infected individuals in the Western world, modeling such coinfections in dually reconstituted mice would be another clinically important application (Figure (Figure1). 1).

In summary, human liver–chimeric mice can serve as valuable tools in preclinical drug efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetic applications but also facilitate the study of human hepatotropic pathogens. After more than a decade of working with frail immunodeficient Alb-uPA mice, the FRG model reported by Bissig and colleagues lends itself to become the cornerstone for a wide variety of investigations and will likely provide the platform for further improvements (16).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Catherine Murray (The Rockefeller University) for editing the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Gates Foundation through the Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative (to all authors) and funded in part by the Greenberg Medical Research Institute, the Ellison Medical Foundation, the Starr Foundation, the Ronald A. Shellow Memorial Fund, the Richard Salomon Family Foundation (to C.M. Rice), and the NIH through the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, grant 1 R01 DK085713-01 (to C.M. Rice and A. Ploss). C.M. Rice is an Ellison Medical Foundation Senior Scholar in Global Infectious Diseases.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: C.M. Rice holds equity in Apath LLC, and AlphaVax Inc. and serves as an advisor for Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, iTherX, Merck, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Pfizer, and Vertex.

Citation for this article: J Clin Invest. 2010;120(3):650–653. doi:10.1172/JCI42338

See the related article beginning on page 924.

References

1. Alter MJ. Epidemiology and prevention of hepatitis B. Semin Liver Dis. 2003;23(1):39–46. [PubMed]
2. Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(9):558–567. [PubMed]
3. Ploss A, et al. Persistent hepatitis C virus infection in microscale primary human hepatocyte cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. In press. [PubMed]
4. Mercer DF, et al. Hepatitis C virus replication in mice with chimeric human livers. Nat Med. 2001;7(8):927–933. doi: 10.1038/90968. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Meuleman P, et al. Morphological and biochemical characterization of a human liver in a uPA-SCID mouse chimera. Hepatology. 2005;41(4):847–856. doi: 10.1002/hep.20657. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Kaul A, Woerz I, Meuleman P, Leroux-Roels G, Bartenschlager R. Cell culture adaptation of hepatitis C virus and in vivo viability of an adapted variant. . J Virol. 2007;81(23):13168–13179. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01362-07. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Meuleman P, Leroux-Roels G. The human liver-uPA-SCID mouse: a model for the evaluation of antiviral compounds against HBV and HCV. Antiviral Res. 2008;80(3):231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.07.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Brezillon NM, et al. Rescue of fertility in homozygous mice for the urokinase plasminogen activator transgene by the transplantation of mouse hepatocytes. Cell Transplant. 2008;17(7):803–812. doi: 10.3727/096368908786516800. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Heckel JL, Sandgren EP, Degen JL, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. Neonatal bleeding in transgenic mice expressing urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Cell. 1990;62(3):447–456. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90010-C. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Suemizu H, et al. Establishment of a humanized model of liver using NOD/Shi-scid IL2Rgnull mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377(1):248–252. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.124. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Song X, et al. A mouse model of inducible liver injury caused by tet-on regulated urokinase for studies of hepatocyte transplantation. Am J Pathol. 2009;175(5):1975–1983. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090349. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Weglarz TC, Degen JL, Sandgren EP. Hepatocyte transplantation into diseased mouse liver. Kinetics of parenchymal repopulation and identification of the proliferative capacity of tetraploid and octaploid hepatocytes. Am J Pathol. 2000;157(6):1963–1974. [PubMed]
13. Azuma H, et al. Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah–/–/Rag2–/–/Il2rg–/– mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(8):903–910. doi: 10.1038/nbt1326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Bissig KD, Le TT, Woods NB, Verma IM. Repopulation of adult and neonatal mice with human hepatocytes: a chimeric animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(51):20507–20511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710528105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Grompe M, et al. Pharmacological correction of neonatal lethal hepatic dysfunction in a murine model of hereditary tyrosinaemia type I. Nat Genet. 1995;10(4):453–460. [PubMed]
16. Bissig K-D, et al. Human liver chimeric mice provide a model for hepatitis B and C virus infection and treatment. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(3):924–930. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Dandri M, et al. Repopulation of mouse liver with human hepatocytes and in vivo infection with hepatitis B virus. Hepatology. 2001;33(4):981–988. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.23314. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Liang Y, et al. Visualizing hepatitis C virus infections in human liver by two-photon microscopy. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(4):1448–1458. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.050. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Frevert U, Usynin I, Baer K, Klotz C. Plasmodium sporozoite passage across the sinusoidal cell layer. Subcell Biochem. 2008;47:182–197. [PubMed]
20. VanBuskirk KM, et al. Preerythrocytic, live-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum vaccine candidates by design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(31):13004–13009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906387106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Morosan S, et al. Liver-stage development of Plasmodium falciparum, in a humanized mouse model. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(7):996–1004. doi: 10.1086/500840. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Legrand N, et al. Humanized mice for modeling human infectious disease: challenges, progress, and outlook. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;6(1):5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.06.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, Greiner DL. Humanized mice in translational biomedical research. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(2):118–130. doi: 10.1038/nri2017. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Sullivan GJ, et al. Generation of functional human hepatic endoderm from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):329–335. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Si-Tayeb K, et al. Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):297–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Snykers S, De Kock J, Rogiers V, Vanhaecke T. In vitro differentiation of embryonic and adult stem cells into hepatocytes: state of the art. Stem Cells. 2009;27(3):577–605. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0963. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Kneteman NM, Mercer DF. Mice with chimeric livers: who says supermodels have to be tall? Hepatology. 2005;41(4):703–706. doi: 10.1002/hep.20681. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Adams DH, Eksteen B. Aberrant homing of mucosal T cells and extra-intestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(3):244–251. doi: 10.1038/nri1784. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Ploss A, Rice CM. Towards a small animal model for hepatitis C. EMBO Rep. 2009;10(11):1220–1227. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.223. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation