Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jwhMary Ann Liebert, Inc.Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.JournalsSearchAlerts
Journal of Women's Health
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 October; 18(10): 1719–1720.
PMCID: PMC2825721

Authors' Reply

Evidence from a variety of sources indicates that the term “chronic Lyme disease” is a misnomer and is often improperly used to diagnose patients who have illnesses completely unrelated to Borrelia burgdorferi infection.14 Our study found that patients with chronic Lyme disease were significantly more likely to be female than were patients reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) with Lyme disease (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42, 95% CI 1.98-2.94, p < 0.0001) or than were those with “post-Lyme disease syndrome” (OR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.62-3.34, p < 0.0001).5 These results suggested the likelihood that nonspecific illnesses with a female predominance, such as fibromyalgia, are being misdiagnosed as chronic Lyme disease.511 A recent publication by Hassett et al.12 corroborates both the findings and the conclusions of our report. Using patients evaluated at an academic Lyme disease referral center in New Jersey, these investigators distinguished patients with chronic Lyme disease from those with post-Lyme disease syndrome or active Lyme disease. Of the 46 patients categorized as having chronic Lyme disease, 38 (82.6%) were female compared with 17 (54.8%) of the 31 with post-Lyme disease syndrome (p = 0.01) and with 20 (50%) of the 40 with active Lyme disease (p = 0.002). Consistent with the observed difference in gender, patients with chronic Lyme disease were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with fibromyalgia than were those with post-Lyme disease syndrome (60.9% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.003).

In their letter, Stricker and Johnson13 hypothesize that the reason for the male predominance in Lyme disease is that the evidence-based interpretative criteria for immunoblot testing recommended by the CDC are in some way biased against women. This is a specious argument for many reasons. First, a recent study explicitly demonstrated that there is no effect of gender on the results of serological testing for Lyme disease.14 Moreover, to our knowledge, gender bias in serological testing for infectious diseases is unprecedented. Second, Stricker and Johnson appear to have overlooked the fact that >70% of Lyme disease cases reported to the CDC are based on the occurrence of erythema migrans (EM) only and, thus, are unrelated to any immunoblot result.15 Considering only patients with EM, there is still a male predominance in reported cases (Paul Mead, CDC, personal communication, 2009). A similar male predominance is seen in a wide variety of other tick-borne and mosquito-borne diseases,1619 consistent with an increased risk of exposure to arthropod bites among men. In addition, in contrast to what Stricker and Johnson state, seropositivity was not in fact a requirement in the Krupp et al. study20 or in one of the two Klempner et al.21 trials.

Contrary to what Stricker and Johnson assert,13 evidence convincingly shows that the alternative immunoblot criteria used by Donta22,23 to diagnose chronic Lyme disease are insufficiently specific to be useful clinically.1 Furthermore, the putative relationship of a decrease in CD57 natural killer cells to post-Lyme disease symptoms has been shown to be invalid.24


The assistance of Lisa Giarratano is greatly appreciated. This publication was supported in part by CTSA grants UL1 RR024139, KL2 RR024138, and K24RR022477 (E.D.S.) from the National Center for Research Resources, a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Road map for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from the NIH website.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.


1. Feder HM., Jr Johnson BJB. O'Connell S, et al. A critical appraisal of “chronic Lyme disease.” N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1422–1430. [PubMed]
2. Reid MC. Schoen RT. Evans J. Rosenberg JC. Horwitz RI. The consequences of over diagnosis and over treatment of Lyme disease: An observational study. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:354–362. [PubMed]
3. Steere AC. Taylor E. McHugh GL. Logigian EL. The over diagnosis of Lyme disease. JAMA. 1993;269:1812–1826. [PubMed]
4. Rose CD. Fawcett PT. Gibney KM. Doughty RA. The over diagnosis of Lyme disease in children residing in an endemic area. Clin Pediatr. 1994;33:663–668. [PubMed]
5. Wormser GP. Shapiro ED. Implications of gender in chronic Lyme disease. J Womens Health. 2009;18:831–834. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Jason LA. Richman JA. Rademaker AW, et al. A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2129–2137. [PubMed]
7. Buchwald D. Pearlman T. Kith P. Schmaling K. Gender differences in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:397–401. [PubMed]
8. Munce SEP. Stewart DE. Gender differences in depression and chronic pain conditions in a national epidemiologic survey. Psychosomatics. 2007;48:394–399. [PubMed]
9. Petzke F. Gracely RH. Park KM. Ambrose K. Clauw DJ. What do tender points measure? Influence of distress on four measures of tenderness. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:567–574. [PubMed]
10. Gran JT. The epidemiology of chronic generalized musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheum. 2003;17:547–561. [PubMed]
11. Yunus MB. The role of gender in fibromyalgia syndrome. Curr Rheum Rep. 2001;3:128–134. [PubMed]
12. Hassett AL. Radvanski DC. Buyske S, et al. Role of psychiatric co-morbidity in chronic Lyme disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1742–1749. [PubMed]
13. Stricker RB. Johnson L. Gender bias in chronic Lyme disease. J Women's Health. 2009;18:1717–1718. [PubMed]
14. Wormser GP. Nowakowski J. Nadelman RB, et al. Impact of clinical variables on Borrelia burgdorferi-specific antibody seropositivity in acute-phase sera from patients in North America with culture-confirmed early Lyme disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:1519–1522. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Bacon RM. Kugeler KJ. Mead PS. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 1992–2006. MMWR. 2008;57(SS10):1–9. [PubMed]
16. Treadwell TA. Holman RC. Clarke MJ. Krebs JW. Paddock CD. Childs JE. Rocky mountain spotted fever in the United States, 1993–1996. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63:21–26. [PubMed]
17. Gardner SL. Holman RC. Krebs JW. Berkelman R. Child JE. National surveillance for the human ehrlichiosis in the United States, 1997–2001, and proposed methods for evaluation of data quality. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003;990:80–89. [PubMed]
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tularemia—United States, 1990–2000. MMWR. 2002;51:182–184.
19. Reimann CA. Hayes EB. DiGuiseppi C, et al. Epidemiology of neuroinvasive arboviral disease in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:974–979. [PubMed]
20. Krupp LB. Hyman LG. Grimson R, et al. Study and treatment of post-Lyme disease (Stop-LD). A randomized double-masked clinical trial. Neurology. 2003;60:1923–1930. [PubMed]
21. Klempner MS. Hu LT. Evans J, et al. Two controlled trials of antibiotic treatment in patients with persistent symptoms and a history of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:85–92. [PubMed]
22. Donta ST. Tetracycline therapy of chronic Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:S52–S56. [PubMed]
23. Donta ST. Macrolide therapy of chronic Lyme disease. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9:1136–1142. [PubMed]
24. Marques A. Brown MR. Fleisher TA. Natural killer cell counts are not different between patients with post-Lyme disease syndrome and controls. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009. June 10 (e-pub ahead of print). [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.