Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 10.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2825142

Common origins of hippocampal ivy and nitric oxide synthase expressing neurogliaform cells


GABAergic interneurons critically regulate cortical computation through exquisite spatio-temporal control over excitatory networks. Precision of this inhibitory control requires a remarkable diversity within interneuron populations that is largely specified during embryogenesis. Although nNOS+ interneurons constitute the largest hippocampal interneuron cohort their origin and specification remain unknown. Thus, as neurogliaform (NGC) and Ivy cells (IvC) represent the main nNOS+ interneurons we investigated their developmental origins. Although considered distinct interneuron subtypes NGCs and IvCs exhibited similar neurochemical and electrophysiological signatures including NPY expression and late-spiking. Moreover, lineage analyses, including loss-of-function experiments and inducible fate-mapping, indicated that nNOS+ IvCs and NGCs are both derived from medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) progenitors under control of the transcription factor Nkx2-1. Surprisingly, a subset of NGCs lacking nNOS arises from caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) progenitors. Thus, while nNOS+ NGCs and IvCs arise from MGE progenitors, a CGE origin distinguishes a discrete population of nNOS-NGCs.

Keywords: Hippocampus, Interneurons, nNOS, Cell fate, Cre-transgenic, Patch Clamp, Neuropeptide


Cortical circuit processing critically relies on the ability of a relatively small number of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons to temporally and spatially coordinate information transfer amongst large numbers of glutamatergic principal cells (Somogyi and Klausberger, 2005). Disruption of this excitation-inhibition dynamic is a precipitating factor in several neurological disorders (Levitt et al., 2004; Cossart et al., 2005; Lewis et al., 2005) and developmental studies indicate that several genes associated with such disorders are expressed in interneurons during embryogenesis (Batista-Brito et al., 2008). Therefore, interneuron misspecification early in development may underlie pathological alterations of mature cortical networks (Batista-Brito and Fishell, 2009). However, the remarkable diversity of interneurons has confounded our understanding of their precise roles in controlling network computation.

Recently, developmental criteria have been used to explore the functional diversity of interneurons (Wichterle et al., 2001; Nery et al., 2002; Butt et al., 2005; Miyoshi et al., 2007; Butt et al., 2008; Sousa et al., 2009). Indeed the ultimate fate of an interneuron, the subgroup to which it belongs, and thus its role in the mature cortical network, is in part dictated by early specification during embryogenesis (Butt et al., 2005; Miyoshi et al., 2007; Batista-Brito and Fishell, 2009). Neocortical and hippocampal interneurons originate mainly from the medial and the caudal ganglionic eminences (MGE and CGE respectively) in the ventral telencephalon (Anderson et al., 1999; Lavdas et al., 1999; Sussel et al., 1999; Pleasure et al., 2000; Wichterle et al., 2001; Nery et al., 2002; Butt et al., 2005; Fogarty et al., 2007). MGE derived interneurons ultimately give rise to parvalbumin (PV)-, and somatostatin (SOM)-expressing interneuron cohorts, whereas calretinin (CR)- and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-expressing interneurons arise from the CGE (Xu et al., 2004; Butt et al., 2005; Fogarty et al., 2007; Miyoshi et al., 2007). Curiously, in the hippocampus, the neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) is expressed in an interneuron subpopulation that does not overlap with PV and SOM interneurons (Fuentealba et al., 2008b) but also largely segregates from CR interneurons (Jinno and Kosaka, 2002) leaving the developmental origin of nNOS interneurons in question. nNOS strongly colocalizes with neuropeptide Y in both Ivy cells (IvCs; (Fuentealba et al., 2008b; Szabadics and Soltesz, 2009)) and a subset of neurogliaform cells (NGCs; (Price et al., 2005)). Based on laminar positioning IvCs and NGCs are considered distinct interneuron subtypes with unique functional roles during hippocampal rhythmic activity (Fuentealba et al., 2008b). However, the similar electrophysiological, anatomical, and molecular properties of IvCs and NGCs suggests that they may belong to the same interneuron family (Szabadics and Soltesz, 2009). Interestingly, NPY containing interneurons have dual origins arising from both the MGE and CGE (Butt et al., 2005; Fogarty et al., 2007) raising the intriguing possibility that nNOS+/NPY+ NGCs and IvCs can be parsed based on lineage. Here we used a multiparametric approach combining genetic, molecular, immunohistochemical, and electrophysiological analyses to directly compare and contrast the developmental origins of nNOS hippocampal interneurons with particular emphasis on IvCs and NGCs.

Materials and methods


All experiments were conducted in accordance with animal protocols approved by the National Institutes of Health.

Double-heterozygote Olig2CreER/+: Z/EG+/− (Novak et al., 2000; Takebayashi et al., 2002) and double-homozygous Mash1BACCreER/CreER/RCE:LoxP+/+ (Miyoshi et al, submitted) male mice were crossed with 6- to 8-week-old wild-type Swiss Webster females (Taconic, Germantown, NY) for litter production. Two milligrams (embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) and E10.5), 3 mg (E11.5 and E12.5), 4 mg (E13.5 and E14.5) and 3 mg (E16.5) of tamoxifen (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were dissolved in corn oil (20 mg/ml) (Sigma) were delivered to pregnant mothers between 1:00 and 3:00 pm by oral gavage with a silicon-protected needle (Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA).

Genotyping was done by PCR with the following primers: Olig2CreER, forward, TCGAGAGCTTAGATCATCC, reverse, CACCGCCGCCCAGTTTGTCC, mutant reverse, GGACAGAAGCATTTTCCAGG (wild-type:247 bp, mutant:172 bp) ; Z/EG, forward, ACACCCTGGTGAACCGCATCGAG, reverse, GCGCTTCTCGTTGGGGTCTTTGC (296 bp); Mash1BAC-CreER, forward, AACTTTCCTCCGGGGCTCGTTTC, reverse, TCCACTCTCCATCTTGCCAGAG, mutant reverse, CGCCTGGCGATCCCTGAACATG (wild-type:169 bp, mutant:247 bp); RCE:LoxP, forward, CCCAAAGTCGCTCTGAGTTGTTATC, reverse, GAAGGAGCGGGAGAAATGGATATG, mutant reverse, CCAGGCGGGCCATTTACCGTAAG (wild-type:550 bp, mutant:350 bp); Nkx2-1Cre, forward, AAGGCGGACTCGGTCCACTCCG, reverse, TCCTCCAGGGGACTCAAGATG, mutant reverse: TCGGATCCGCCGCATAACCAG (wild-type: 220 bp, mutant: 550 bp). Alternatively, Z/EG allele screening was performed using LacZ staining with Fluorescein di-β-D-galactopyranoside (Anaspec, San Jose, CA). Nkx2-1 and Nkx2-1flx alleles were genotyped using the primer as described in Butt et al (2008). NPY-hrGFP (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, MA) mice were genotyped as described in van den Pol et al (2009). Alternatively, P0–2 NPY-hrGFP and Nkx2-1BAC-Cre/RCE:LoxP pups were examined under blue light illumination for screening cerebral GFP fluorescence. NPY-tau-GFP (Jackson Laboratory) mice were genotyped using the same primers as used for the ZEG mouse


Three- to four-week-old mice were perfused transcardially using a 0.1 M PBS solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde followed by 1 or 3 h of postfixation. Brains were cryoprotected using 20–30% sucrose/PBS solution, sliced to 40 μm thickness using a freezing microtome, and kept at 4°C for up to 3 weeks until used. Free-floating sections were blocked for 2h at room temperature in a PBS/0.5% Triton X-100/1% BSA/10% normal goat serum (NGS) solution before being incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in a PBS/1% BSA/1% NGS solution (BG-PBS). Slices were washed with BG-PBS supplemented with 0.5% Triton X-100 before being incubated for 1 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies diluted in BG-PBS. Nuclear counterstaining was performed with 100 ng/ml 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) solution in PBS for 20 min. After extensive washing in PBS, slices were mounted on gelatin-coated slides in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Antibodies were used in the following concentrations: mouse anti-PV (1:1000; Sigma), rabbit anti-PV (1:1000; Swant, Bellinzona, Switzerland), rabbit anti-SOM (1:500; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), rabbit anti-NPY (1:500; Immunostar, Hudson, WI), rabbit anti-NPY (1:1000, generous gift from Betty Eiper, code JH3, (Milgram et al., 1996)), rabbit anti-VIP) (1:500; Immunostar), rabbit anti-CR (1:1000; Millipore), rabbit anti-nNOS (1:1000, Millipore, Billerica, MA), mouse anti-nNOS (1:1000, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), chicken anti-GFP (1:2000; Aves Labs, Tigard, OR), goat anti-chicken alexafluor488 (1:500; Invitrogen), F(ab)2 fragment of goat anti-rabbit alexafluor555 (1:500; Invitrogen) and goat anti-mouse alexafluor633 (1:500; Invitrogen). Fluorescent images were captured using a Retiga 4000R cooled CCD camera (Qimaging, Surrey, Canada) or using a Live duo scan confocal system (Zeiss, Germany).

In Situ Hybridization

Postnatal P15–P17 brains were fixed by transcardial perfusion followed by 4 hr to overnight postfixation with 4% PFA/PBS solution at 4°C. Brain tissue was then rinsed with PBS, cryoprotected using 30% sucrose/PBS solution overnight at 4°C, embedded in Tissue Tek, frozen on dry ice, and sectioned at 12 μm. Section in situ hybridizations were performed as previously described (Hanashima et al., 2002), using nonradioactive DIG-labeled probes. The cDNA probes used included Gad67 and Lhx6


P14–P21 mice (of various genotypes, as indicated throughout the text) were anesthetized with isoflurane, and the brain dissected out in ice-cold saline solution containing (in mM): 80 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 3.5 KCl, 9 MgSO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 10 glucose, 90 sucrose, saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (pH 7.4). Transverse hippocampal slices (300 μm) were cut using a VT-1000S vibratome (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL) and incubated in the above solution at 35°C for recovery (1 h), after which they were kept at room temperature until use. Individual slices were transferred to an upright microscope and visualized with infrared differential interference contrast microscopy (Axioscope FS2; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Slices were perfused (2 ml/min) with extracellular solution composed of (in mM) 130 NaCl, 24 NaHCO3, 3.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.5 MgCl2, 5 Na-pyruvate and 10 glucose, saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (pH 7.4). Recordings were performed at 32–34°C with electrodes (3–5 MΩ) pulled from borosilicate (World precision instruments) filled with 150mM K-gluconate, 4mM NaCl, 3 MgCl2, 0.5 EGTA, and 10 HEPES plus 2 mg/ml biocytin (Sigma). The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with KOH (~300 mOsm). Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made using a Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Signals were filtered at 3 kHz (Bessel filter; Frequency Devices, Haverhill, MA) and digitized at 20 kHz (Digidata 1440A and pClamp 10.2 Software; Molecular Devices). Recordings were not corrected for a liquid junction potential. Resting potentials were measured immediately after breakthrough. Input resistances (Rm) was measured using a linear regression of voltage deflections (± 15 mV from resting potential, ~60 mV) in response to 2 s current steps of six to ten different amplitudes (increment 5 pA). Membrane time constant (τm) was calculated from the mean responses to 20 successive hyperpolarizing current pulses (−20pA; 400 ms). Time constant was determined by fitting voltage responses with a single exponential function. Membrane capacitance was calculated according to Cmm/Rm. Action potential threshold was defined as the voltage at which the slope trajectory reaches 10 mV/ms (Stuart and Hausser, 1994). Action potential amplitude was defined as the difference in membrane potential between threshold and the peak. Afterhyperpolarization (AHP) amplitude was defined as the difference between action potential threshold and the most negative membrane potential attained during the AHP. These properties were obtained from the mean value of the first two action potentials elicited by depolarizing 800 ms-long current pulse of just supra-threshold strength. The adaptation ratio was defined as the ratio of the average of the last 2–3 interspike intervals relative to the first interspike interval during a 800-ms-long spike train. Firing frequency was calculated as the inverse of the mean interspike interval during the same spike train. Adaptation ratio and firing frequency were calculated based on response evoked by current pulse of just above threshold strength and twice that value.

Single-Cell Reverse Transcription--Polymerase Chain Reaction (scPCR)

The scPCR protocol was designed to detect simultaneously the transcripts of PV, CR, calbindin (CB), the GABA synthesizing enzymes GAD65 and 67, NPY, SOM, VIP and cholecystokinin (CCK), nNOS and the GABAA receptor subunit α1 (GABAARα1). At the end of the recording, cell cytoplasm was aspirated into the recording pipette while maintaining the tight seal. The content of the pipette was expelled into a test tube, and subjected to reverse transcription (RT) and two steps of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described previously (Lambolez et al., 1992; Cauli et al., 1997; Karagiannis et al., 2009). The cDNA present in the RT reaction were first amplified simultaneously using all primer pairs described in Table S1 in a total volume of 100μl (for each primer pair, the sense and antisense primers were positioned on two different exons). A second round of PCR was then performed using 2 μl of the first PCR product as a template. In the second round, each cDNA was amplified individually with a second pair of primers internal to the primer pair used in the first PCR (nested primers, see Table S1) and positioned on two different exons. The RT-PCR protocol was tested on 1 ng of total RNA purified from mouse whole brain. All the transcripts were detected from 1 ng of whole-brain RNA (see fig 1F). The sizes of the PCR-generated fragments were as predicted by the mRNA sequences (see Table S1). Routinely, a control for mRNA contamination from surrounding tissue was performed by placing a patch pipette in the slice without establishing a seal. Positive pressure was then interrupted, and, following the removal of the pipette, its content was processed as described. No PCR product was obtained using this protocol.

Figure 1
Anatomical, neurochemical and electrophysiological characterization of Ivy cells and neurogliaform cells

Data analysis

Immunocytochemical cell counting was performed on at least three non consecutive sections from at least three animals from different litters. Except for experiments with Nkx2-1 conditional mutant, two mutant animals and two control littermates were used for each time points. Values are given as mean ± standard error of the mean.

Electrophysiological parameters were measured using procedures written in Igor 6 (Wavemetrics, Portland, OR) and using Clampfit 10 (Molecular devices). Difference between groups was assayed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by multiple comparison post-hoc tests using the software Statistica 8 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK). The level of significance (5%) was adjusted using the Bonferroni correction.


Ivy and neurogliaform cells share similar electrophysiological and molecular properties

To initially target IvCs and NGCs, we took advantage of two bacterial artificial chromosome-based transgenic lines, NPY-tau-GFP (Pinto et al., 2004) and NPY-hrGFP (van den Pol et al., 2009), that express GFP under control of the NPY promoter. CA1 GFP+ interneurons (n=13 IvCs and 35 NGCs) were visually identified and then characterized by combining patch-clamp recordings, single cell RT-PCR (scPCR), and biocytin labeling (Cauli et al., 1997) for physiological, molecular, and morphological identification, respectively. Their electrophysiological profile was examined using 15 features describing their intrinsic excitability and firing properties (see methods for definitions of the parameters). The scPCR protocol was designed to detect simultaneously the transcripts of multiple interneuron markers (see methods and table S1) including nNOS and the GABAA receptor subunit α1 (GABAARα1).

Consistently with previous studies (Vida et al., 1998; Price et al., 2005), NGCs were found close to the boundaries between stratum lacunosum moleculare (slm) and stratum radiatum (sr), or stratum moleculare (sm) of the dentate gyrus, or at the border with CA3. Cells exhibited multipolar morphologies comprised of several primary dendrites emanating from the soma (Fig 1A). The dendritic field was typically restricted to slm with occasional dendrites penetrating sr or sm. NGCs exhibited a dense axonal field with its lateral extent broader than the corresponding dendritic field. In contrast, IvCs were typically found throughout sr, s. pyramidale (sp) and s. oriens (so) with dendritic arbors that often crossed these layers without penetrating slm (Fig 1A) as described previously (Fuentealba et al., 2008b). Similar to NGCs, the axonal plexus of IvCs comprised thin branches that formed a dense and widespread plexus covering a greater extent of the CA1 field than their dendritic tree.

ScPCR analysis of morphologically identified NGCs and IvCs (n=35 and 13 respectively) revealed infrequent expression of PV, CR, SOM, VIP and cholecystokinin (CCK) transcripts. Both IvCs and NGCs consistently coexpressed NPY, nNOS and GABAARα1 (Fig 1B and C, Table S2 and S3), however a subset of NGCs (10/35) were nNOS negative. Importantly, slm interneurons which lacked an NGC like morphology (n=15) were never positive for NPY or nNOS and only rarely expressed GABAARα1 transcripts confirming that this combination of markers serves as a relatively unique footprint to IvC and NGC populations.

Among the 15 electrophysiological properties measured for each IvC and NGC (IvC, n=13; NGC nNOS+, n=25; NGC nNOS−, n=10; Table 1, see Methods for definition), 13 were not significantly different between the three groups with the exception of membrane capacitance and the action potential adaptation ratio (measured at twice threshold stimulation, p= 0.0026 and 0.005 respectively). Post hoc multiple comparison tests performed on these parameters revealed a significant difference between IvCs and the two NGC groups but not between the two NGC groups. The difference in membrane capacitance likely reflects the dendritic field of IvCs that typically spreads across several layers resulting in greater total dendritic length.

Table 1
Electrophysiological properties of identified Ivy (IvC) and neurogliaform cells (NGF).

NGCs are characterized by a delay to generate action potentials when challenged by just supra-threshold current injection (Fig 1D) (Price et al., 2005; Zsiros and Maccaferri, 2005) and therefore are often named “late spiking” (LS, (Kawaguchi, 1995)). All recorded NGCs, whether nNOS+ or nNOS−, exhibited a LS phenotype as did all identified IvCs (Fig 1D). This feature, quantified as the latency to generate the 1st spike upon just supra-threshold stimulation, was similar for IvCs, nNOS+ NGCs, and nNOS− NGCs (511±51 ms vs. 376±40 ms vs. 354±66 ms respectively, n=13, 25, 10 respectively, p=0.1058). Importantly, no significant differences were found between IvC and NGC spike thresholds, amplitudes and durations, AHP amplitudes and durations, and maximum slopes during spike repolarization (See table 1). These similarities between action potential waveforms are easily visualized in phase plots (dVm/dt vs. Vm) of firing in response to 2× threshold stimulation which clearly indicate that IvCs and NGCs exhibit similar spike amplitude and maximum slope during the rising and repolarizing phases of action potentials (Fig 1E). In addition, neither cell type exhibited adaptation of firing frequency at threshold stimulation and instead typically increased their firing frequency towards the end of the stimulus (adaptation ratio ≥ 1, e.g. fig 1D). However, upon stronger stimulation, NGCs switched to an adaptative spiking profile that was more pronounced than in IvCs (adaptation ratio at 2× threshold, 0.73±0.04 and 0.72±0.07 for nNOS+ and nNOS− NGCs respectively vs. 0.92±0.02 for IvCs).

Together our data indicate that despite residing in different hippocampal layers IvCs and NGCs have similar dendritic and axonal features with almost identical electrophysiological properties. Moreover, IvCs and the vast majority of NGCs, the nNOS+ cohort, exhibit overlapping molecular profiles.

Ivy and nNOS+ neurogliaform interneurons both originate from MGE

The common NPY expression within all NGCs and IvCs, combined with the fact that a large population of hippocampal NPY+ interneurons originate from the MGE (Fogarty et al., 2007), prompted us to consider whether IvCs and NGCs both derive from the MGE. The homeobox gene Nkx2-1 (also known as Titf1) is expressed ubiquitously throughout the MGE, and is excluded from the LGE and CGE. It has been proposed that Nkx2-1 acts as a molecular switch that favors MGE fate over CGE fate (Butt et al., 2008). To investigate the developmental origins of IvCs and NGCs we used a combined genetic fate-mapping and immunocytochemical approach. We crossed an Nkx2-1BAC-Cre driver line (Xu et al., 2008) with the newly developed Cre-dependant GFP reporter line RCE:LoxP (Sousa et al., 2009) to confer permanent labeling of Nkx2-1-expressing precursors with GFP to examine the fate of MGE-derived interneurons in the mature hippocampus. We then stained hippocampal sections for a variety of classic interneuron markers. In CA1 of adult hippocampus, the majority (73%) of GFP+ cells were located in so and sp (35±3% and 38±1% respectively of the total number of CA1 GFP+ interneurons vs. 16±1 and 11±1% in sr and slm, n=1992, see Fig 2A). As observed in other studies using a different MGE driver line (Fogarty et al., 2007) or a different reporter line (Xu et al., 2008), all PV+ interneurons were also GFP+ (Fig 2B), and a similar coexpression pattern was observed for SOM+ interneurons (data not shown) confirming the reliability of the Nkx2-1BAC-Cre/RCE:LoxP construct for labeling MGE derived interneuron precursors.

Figure 2
Interneurons expressing nNOS belong to an MGE lineage

Next, because IvCs and NGCs combined represent the majority of nNOS+ hippocampal interneurons we compared the expression pattern of nNOS and GFP in our Nkx2-1BAC-Cre/RCE:LoxP cross. In contrast to PV+ and SOM+ interneurons, nNOS+ interneurons were found throughout all the layers of CA1 (Fig 2C). On average, nNOS+ interneurons comprised 37±2% of GFP+ interneurons (n=1992, see Fig 2D). Within the slm, this percentage rose to 94±2% but dropped to 23±2% and 25%±3% in so and sp respectively. Conversely, 75±1% of CA1 nNOS+ interneurons were also GFP+ (n=990, Fig 2C–D). The vast majority of nNOS+ interneurons derived from Nkx2-1 progenitors were found in the so, sr, and slm with a smaller percentage of nNOS+ interneurons within sp being GFP+ (e.g. 57±2% and 95±2% of nNOS+ cells colocalized GFP in sp and slm respectively, see Fig 2D).

To investigate a potential CGE origin of nNOS+ interneurons, we additionally compared nNOS and the chicken ovalbumin upstream-transcriptional factor II (CoupTFII, also known as Nr2f2 or Arp-1) expression patterns. CoupTFII is expressed in the CGE and remains detectable during interneuron migration (Kanatani et al., 2008; Willi-Monnerat et al., 2008) as well as in a subset of mature hippocampal interneurons (Fuentealba et al., 2008a; Kanatani et al., 2008). In contrast to nNOS, the expression pattern of CoupTFII was complementary to that of GFP in Nkx2-1/RCE-lox-P offspring with very few CoupTFII+ interneurons being GFP+ (Fig 2E). Thus, CoupTFII+ interneurons are not MGE-derived confirming CoupTFII as a useful marker of CGE lineage. Consistent with the low colocalization between CoupTFII and GFP we found that only 6±1% of nNOS+ interneurons coexpressed CoupTFII (n=695, Fig 2F-G). The highest percentage of CoupTFII/nNOS+ colocalization was found in sp an area where GFP/nNOS coexpression was lowest. These data further indicate that most nNOS+ interneurons originate from the MGE with only a small fraction deriving from CGE progenitors.

To confirm whether GFP+ slm interneurons in the Nkx2-1BAC-Cre/RCE:LoxP mouse are indeed NGCs, we targeted GFP+ cells in acute brain slices from these mice for whole-cell patch-clamp recordings to perform electrophysiological, single cell RT-PCR (scPCR), and post-hoc morphological characterization (n=13). All tested GFP+ cells exhibited NGC morphologies (Fig 2H) and LS profiles (Fig 2I) that yielded phase plots (Fig 2J) similar to IvCs and NGCs recorded in NPY-GFP mice (cf Fig 1D). Moreover the molecular profile of slm GFP+ cells was typified by a high occurrence of NPY, nNOS and GABAARα1 (Fig 2K and Table S4). These properties are all consistent with NGCs and combined with our immunocytochemical data confirm that nNOS+ NGCs are MGE-derived.

Spatial and temporal origins of nNOS+ interneurons

In addition to the place of birth, a growing body of evidence suggests that interneuron identity is specified in the embryonic brain in a temporally dependant manner (Butt et al., 2005; Miyoshi et al., 2007). Olig2 is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor (Lu et al., 2002) expressed in progenitors of the ventral embryonic eminences, with the highest levels of expression occurring in the MGE. Using a driver allele expressing a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase (CreER) under control of the endogenous Olig2 locus (Olig2CreER; (Takebayashi et al., 2002)), crossed with the Cre dependant GFP reporter allele Z/EG (Novak et al., 2000), we next performed inducible genetic fate mapping (Joyner and Zervas, 2006) of the temporally distinct cohorts of MGE-derived precursors (Miyoshi et al., 2007) to further verify the MGE origin of nNOS + interneurons and probe for any temporal order to the birth of these cells. Pregnant females received a single dose of tamoxifen by gavaging at different time points between E9.5 and E13.5 and then GFP+ cells were characterized in 3–4 week old animals. For all tested time points, this fate-mapping strategy resulted in GFP labelling of just a few interneurons throughout the hippocampus. In the dentate gyrus and CA3 we found fate-mapped cells in all the layers. In CA1, GFP+ cells preferentially localized in so and sp.

A significant fraction of fate-mapped interneurons at each time point were nNOS+ (Fig 3A,B). Indeed, nNOS+ cells represented ~34% of the populations fate mapped at early time points (E9.5 and E10.5, n=79 each) but decreased in number to ~20% at intermediate time points (E11.5 and E12.5, n= 124 and 79 respectively) and then finally peaked at 51% after tamoxifen induction at the latest time point examined (E13.5, n=39). In agreement with lineage analysis of Nkx2-1 expressing interneuron precursors, we found nNOS+ fate-mapped interneurons in all layers of CA1. To confirm the identity of these spatially and temporally fate-mapped interneurons we recorded and analyzed 46 GFP+ interneurons from 2–3 week old animals that had undergone tamoxifen administration between E9.5 and E13.5. Thirteen of 46 GFP+ cells were positive for nNOS (table S4), and most of these cells were also positive for NPY and the GABAARα1 transcripts (12/13 for each marker). Importantly, virtually all cells displayed a LS phenotype, characteristic of nNOS+ cells recorded in NPY-GFP mice. The morphology of 6/7 interneurons, located in sr and so, was successfully recovered, allowing their classification as IvCs (Fig 3C–F). Cells located in the slm all exhibited firing and molecular profiles consistent with NGCs and in 3/6 cells their NGC morphology was confirmed (Fig S1 and table S4). Together these data again point to a common MGE origin of IvCs and nNOS+ NGCs and further indicate that the temporal origins of these cells exhibit a biphasic pattern.

Figure 3
Inducible genetic fate mapping of MGE derived nNOS+ interneurons

Nkx2-1 requirement for the generation of IvCs and NGCs

The transcription factor Nkx2-1 and its downstream effector, the Lim homeodomain protein Lhx6 are required for the proper specification and migration of MGE-derived interneurons (Pleasure et al., 2000; Liodis et al., 2007; Butt et al., 2008). Previous studies on embryonic neocortex and hippocampus have found that loss of Nkx2.1 function results in loss of NPY+ and nNOS+ cortical interneurons (Pleasure et al., 2000; Anderson et al., 2001). However, lineage analysis showed that NPY+ interneurons exhibit dual MGE/CGE origin (Butt et al., 2005; Fogarty et al., 2007). Given the molecular diversity of neocortical nNOS and NPY interneurons (Lee and Jeon, 2005; Karagiannis et al., 2009) and the essentially postnatal development of hippocampal NPY and nNOS expression patterns (Soriano et al., 1994; Morys et al., 2002), we investigated further the role of Nkx2-1 on specification of IvCs and NGCs in mature hippocampus when NPY and nNOS phenotypes are fully established. Because Nkx2-1 knock-out mice die at birth, we used an Nkx2-1 loxP-flanked conditional loss-of-function allele (Kusakabe et al., 2006) together with a genetic fate-mapping strategy to examine the role of Nkx2-1 in specifying the fate of nNOS+ precursors. By crossing the Olig2CreER driver line onto an Nkx2-1 conditionally null background, we were able to genetically remove Nkx2-1 gene function from the MGE progenitor population during the period of cortical interneuron genesis (Butt et al., 2008). Although the use of this strategy overcomes the issue of perinatal lethality, mutant pups exhibit a large decrease in the number of GABAergic interneurons in the cortex and hippocampus (Fig 4A) precipitating seizures and poor survival after two weeks of age after tamoxifen-mediated Cre activation at E9.5 or E10.5 (Butt et al., 2008). Therefore, we compared the abundance of different hippocampal PV, CR and nNOS interneuron subpopulations in P13-P15 mutant animals (genotype: Olig2CreER+/−:Nkx2-1flx/−) induced at E10.5, with control littermates (genotype: Olig2CreER+/−:Nkx2-1flx/+). We also compared the effects of Nkx2-1 deletion at E10.5 with the results of the deletion at E12.5 in P21 animals.

Figure 4
Nkx2-1 is necessary for the specification of nNOS+ interneurons

Although the loss of Nkx2-1 function does not decrease the total number of GABAergic neurons generated during embryogenesis (Butt et al., 2008), it significantly reduces the number of MGE-derived cortical interneurons in the hippocampus at postnatal stages, as indicated by a large reduction in the number of Lhx6+ interneurons (Fig 4B). As expected, we observed a massive reduction in the number of PV+ interneurons in the whole hippocampus after removal of Nkx2-1 at E10.5 (10% of control, see Fig 4C, E). The loss of PV+ interneurons was still evident but considerably more moderate in mutant mice induced at E12.5 (46% of control). We also found a large decrease in the number of nNOS+ cells in mutants induced at E10.5 (30% of control, Fig 4D, E) consistent with an MGE dominant origin of nNOS+ interneurons. This loss of nNOS+ interneurons was most prominent in so, sr and slm (Fig 4D, E). Interestingly, the vast majority of nNOS+ cells remaining in the mutant mice were located in sp, the layer where most nNOS+GFP-cells were observed in the Nkx2-1BAC-Cre/RCE:LoxP mouse (cf. Fig 3B). Indeed, quantification confirmed that the reduction of nNOS+ interneurons in sp was the smallest (−46% vs. −67, −79 and −97% of control after induction at E10.5 in sp, so, sr and slm respectively, Fig 4E) suggesting that sp nNOS+ interneurons were preferentially spared by the deletion of Nkx2-1. As with PV+ interneurons, the loss of nNOS+ interneurons in mutant mice induced at E12.5 was less pronounced but still evident (42% of control, Fig 4E). As a control, we examined the effect of Nkx2-1 loss of function on the distribution of CR+ interneurons that originate from the CGE. In contrast with PV+ cells, no significant decrease in the distribution of CR+ interneurons was observed in mutants induced at E10.5 (Fig 4F) and E12.5 confirming that the loss of Nkx2-1 affects primarily MGE-derived interneurons. Altogether, our loss of function results demonstrate that Nkx2-1 is crucial to the specification of nNOS+ interneurons and in particular IvCs and nNOS+ NGCs further confirming the MGE origin of these two cell populations.

nNOS is expressed in a subset of VIP expressing bipolar interneurons

The colocalization of CoupTFII/nNOS and the presence of nNOS+/GFP- cells in the Nkx2-1BAC-Cre/RCE:LoxP mouse indicate that an additional subset of nNOS+ interneurons originate from the CGE. Thus, we examined the overlap of nNOS expression with VIP, a marker encountered in CGE-derived interneurons (Xu et al., 2004; Butt et al., 2005). We found a small fraction of CA1 nNOS+ cells to also express VIP (7±1%, n=631, Fig 5A and 5B). Conversely, interneurons coexpressing the two markers represented 17±2% of all VIP+ cells (n=240). This percentage rose to 23±6% when considering cells in sp alone, indicating that nNOS+/VIP+ cells represent a significant portion of the VIP+ interneuron population. This distribution of nNOS+/VIP+ interneurons between CA1 layers is similar to the distribution of nNOS+ CGE derived interneurons observed with CoupTFII staining (Fig 5B and cf. Fig 2F).

Figure 5
A subset of nNOS+ interneurons derive from the CGE and coexpresses VIP

To further characterize this cell population, we took advantage of a GAD65-GFP transgenic line in which GFP is expressed in a subset of CGE derived interneurons to target CGE derived VIP+ interneurons (Lopez-Bendito et al., 2004; Xu and Callaway, 2009). Of 38 GFP+ recorded cells analyzed by scPCR, we found both nNOS and VIP mRNAs in 8 cells. PV, SOM and NPY were rarely detected, whereas CR was found in 75% of the cells (n=6/8. Fig 5 and Fig S2). The morphology of four cells was recovered and none showed morphology consistent with IvCs or NGCs (Fig 5C). Typically somas were located in sp or in sr close to the pyramidal layer and the dendritic fields were vertically oriented with primary axon descending to emit several horizontally-oriented branches at the so-alveus border. These morphological features combined with VIP expression are reminiscent of the interneuron population that has been reported to synaptically target other interneurons (Freund and Buzsaki, 1996). Moreover, VIP+/nNOS+ cells exhibited diverse firing properties but importantly none had a LS phenotype (Fig 5D-E and Fig S2). Thus, the small subset of CGE-derived nNOS+ interneurons is unlikely to contribute to the IvC and NGC populations.

To examine the temporal origin of CGE-derived nNOS+ interneurons, we used a driver line in which CreER is under transcriptional control of a 300kb long promoter fragment of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Mash1 (Ascl1, (Battiste et al., 2007)). Although Mash1 is expressed throughout the subventricular area of the ventral telencephalon (Guillemot et al., 1993), this driver allele, crossed with the RCE:LoxP reporter allele, labels only Mash1-expressing cells in the CGE and LGE but not in the MGE (Miyoshi et al, submitted). Given that the LGE does not generate appreciable numbers of cortical interneurons, we used this driver allele in combination with the RCE:LoxP reporter to study expression of the temporally distinct cohort of CGE-derived interneurons in 4–6 week old animals after tamoxifen administration at E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5 (n=326, 690, 726 respectively). In contrast with the localization of Nkx2-1 expressing interneurons and in agreement with our CoupTFII expression pattern, CA1 fate-mapped cells were mainly found in sr and slm (29±1% and 49±3% of total GFP cells after induction at E14.5, n= 357). We found that nNOS+/GFP+ interneurons typically exhibited a bipolar or vertically oriented morphology (fig 5G), and constituted only a small fraction of the CGE derived interneuron population (E12.5: 3±2%, E14.5=8±1%, E16.5= 10±1%, fig 5H). Interestingly, the distribution of fate-mapped cells that expressed nNOS+ differed from the general localization of GFP+ CGE derived interneurons, being mainly found in sp and sr (41±10% and 28±7% of total nNOS+ cells after induction at E14.5, n= 56). However, this distribution of nNOS+ CGE-derived interneurons overlaps with the distribution of nNOS+/CoupTFII+ interneurons indicating that a small subset of nNOS+ interneurons are generated in the CGE.

Our data show that a small fraction of nNOS+ interneurons arises from the CGE at later embryonic stages than the nNOS+ NGC and IvC populations. In addition, the anatomy, laminar organization, molecular, and electrophysiological properties of these CGE-derived nNOS+ cells are inconsistent with those of IvC and NGC populations. Together these findings indicate that VIP+/nNOS+ cells constitute an interneuron subpopulation distinct from IvCs and NGCs.

A subset of nNOS− neurogliaform cells arises from the CGE

Lineage analyses using genetic (Fogarty et al., 2007) and transplant (Butt et al., 2005) approaches have shown that a large number of NPY+ interneurons derive from the MGE. However, removal of Lhx6 only mildly affects the NPY+ interneuron population generated during late stages of embryogenesis (Zhao et al., 2008). Moreover, in contrast to our current findings in hippocampus, considerable evidence indicates a CGE origin of NGCs in the neocortex where nNOS expression is reduced (Butt et al., 2005; Miyoshi et al., 2007); Miyoshi et al, submitted). Combined with our current findings these observations suggest that nNOS−/NPY+ NGCs likely arise from CGE progenitors. Using the Mash1BAC-CreER/RCE:LoxP line, we examined the morphology of CGE-derived interneurons located in the slm after GFP immunolabeling. At each time point tested (E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5), we found GFP+ cells exhibiting a neurogliaform like architecture (Fig 6A) with dendritic arbors that profusely ramified close to the cell body. To ascertain the identity of these cells, we recorded 34 GFP+ interneurons from animals induced at E12.5 and E16.5. Among these, 16 cells exhibited a LS phenotype similar to the firing profile of NGCs described above (Fig 6 and Fig S1). The remaining cells exhibited adapting spiking in response to near threshold stimulation and these did not possess NGC morphologies. Biocytin filling and staining of 8 GFP+ LS CGE derived interneurons was sufficient for morphological classification as NGCs. scPCR analysis of these cells revealed prominent GAD65 (8/8), GAD67 (8/8), GABAARα1(7/8) and NPY (8/8), but variable nNOS (4/8) transcript expression. An example of a CGE derived LS interneuron fully identified as a NGC is illustrated in figure 6. These results are consistent with previous studies that have identified NGCs in the GAD65-GFP transgenic line that principally labels CGE derived cortical interneurons (Lopez-Bendito et al., 2004; Xu and Callaway, 2009). Thus, a subset of immunocytochemically nNOS-NGCs are derived from the CGE and therefore should be considered distinct from nNOS+ MGE derived NGCs.

Figure 6
A subset of NGF cells derives from the CGE


GABAergic neurons expressing nNOS are one of the largest interneuron populations in the hippocampus (Jinno and Kosaka, 2002; Czeh et al., 2005; Fuentealba et al., 2008b). In this study, lineage analyses based on genetic fate mapping combined with molecular, electrophysiological, and morphological characterization showed that these interneurons derive from both MGE and CGE. Remarkably, our findings reveal that IvCs and nNOS+ NGCs have completely overlapping developmental, electrophysiological, morphological, and neurochemical properties suggesting that these cells constitute a single unique interneuron subtype despite differences in laminar organization. Surprisingly, classically defined NGCs can be subdivided into two groups based on nNOS expression and lineage with nNOS+ NGCs being derived from the MGE and nNOS− NGCs arising from CGE progenitors. A schematic diagram summarizing these findings is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7
Origin of nNOS+ and other main hippocampal interneuron subtypes

Ivy and nNOS+ neurogliaform interneurons are generated within the MGE

IvCs and NGCs have been argued to represent distinct interneuron subtypes (Fuentealba et al., 2008b), despite the rich similarity between these cell types including coexpression of NPY with nNOS, dense axonal arbors, and slow pyramidal cell inhibition. We found that both of these interneurons exhibit a LS phenotype, and fail to express other classical interneuron markers such as PV, SOM or CR. Our initial characterization based on several electrophysiological and molecular properties is consistent with previous findings in separate IvC and NGC studies (Price et al., 2005; Szabadics et al., 2007; Fuentealba et al., 2008b), yet failed to reveal any clear distinction between IvCs and NGCs. Thus, we turned to developmental studies to examine whether IvCs and NGCs could be parsed based on lineage profiles. Our fate-mapping analyses revealed that IvCs and the majority of NGCs, the nNOS+ cohort, derive from the same progenitor pool in the MGE. Using lineage analysis with an Nkx2-1BAC-Cre driver allele and inducible genetic fate mapping with the Olig2CreER allele combined with GFP reporter lines, we determined that both IvCs and nNOS+ NGCs are generated within the MGE. However, Nkx2-1 is also expressed in the preoptic area (POA, (Flames et al., 2007)), a region adjacent to the MGE that gives rise to some cortical NPY+ interneurons (Gelman et al., 2009). Despite the fact POA-derived hippocampal interneurons remain to be identified, their neocortical homologs lack basic features of IvCs and NGCs such as coexpression of NPY with nNOS and LS behavior (Gelman et al., 2009) making it unlikely that any nNOS+/GFP+ cells in the Nkx2-1BAC-Cre/RCE:LoxP originate from the POA. Thus, our lineage analysis indicates a common developmental origin for IvCs and NGCs within the MGE. However, given the distinct laminar organization, and hence synaptic connectivity of IvCs and NGCs, it is possible that both cell types mature under distinct local environmental cues. Moreover, it remains possible that the respective progenitors which give rise to NGCs and IvCs within the MGE are under differential patterning influences that have yet to be elucidated (Xu et al., 2005; Wonders et al., 2008).

Dual origin of nNOS+ interneurons

Several recent studies have determined the embryonic sources of various distinct neocortical interneuron populations yielding considerable insight into the origins of interneuron diversity (Wonders and Anderson, 2006; Batista-Brito and Fishell, 2009). However, despite the widespread expression of nNOS within GABAergic cells (Jinno and Kosaka, 2002), the developmental origin, specification, and circuit integration properties of nNOS+ interneurons have remained elusive as investigation has been hampered by heterogeneous nNOS expression levels (Lee and Jeon, 2005) and perinatal lethality of Nkx2-1 deficient mice (Pleasure et al., 2000). To overcome this latter issue, we used inducible conditional loss of function to examine the role of Nkx2-1 in specifying nNOS+ interneurons. The longer survival of conditional Nkx2-1 knock-out mice allowed us to investigate the role of Nkx2-1 in a broader nNOS interneuron population as we could extend our study to postnatal time points when nNOS is typically upregulated to yield mature expression patterns (Morys et al., 2002). We found that Nkx2-1 deficiency in interneuron precursors results in a large loss of nNOS+ interneurons postnatally, consistent with the decrease of cortical nNOS+ interneurons in embryonic (E19) Nkx2-1 knock-out mice (Anderson et al., 2001). In contrast with PV+ interneurons that were almost completely absent in the hippocampus of mutant animals, we observed a small but significant proportion of nNOS+ interneurons still present after loss of function at E10.5. Although a fraction of nNOS+ interneurons are generated prior to E10.5, as shown by the temporal fate mapping of MGE derived interneurons, and thus could have escaped from control of Nkx2-1, most of the remaining nNOS+ interneurons in the mutant postnatal hippocampus are located in sp. Thus, it is likely that the remaining nNOS+ interneurons originate from the CGE as corroborated by the distribution of nNOS+ CGE derived interneurons and the bipolar morphology of remaining nNOS+ cells in the mutants. These data are also consistent with the results of lineage analysis of MGE derived interneurons using the Nkx2-1BAC-Cre allele where the overlap between GFP and nNOS was weakest in sp. While it is possible that the remaining nNOS+ cells result from respecification of MGE derived precursors into a CGE-like phenotype (Butt et al., 2008), the most parsimonious explanation is that the majority of nNOS+ cells originate from the MGE with a small cohort derived from the CGE.

Consistent with a CGE origin of some nNOS+ interneurons, nNOS is expressed in a subset of CR+ interneurons (Jinno and Kosaka, 2002). Using transgenic mice that express GFP in CGE derived interneurons, we identified a bipolar NPY-lacking nNOS+ interneuron population that coexpresses VIP and mainly localizes near the pyramidal layer. The diverse firing properties of these cells are consistent with those of neocortical VIP+ interneurons (Porter et al., 1998). In general, the properties of nNOS+/VIP+ neurons are reminiscent of type IS3 cells that are thought to inhibit a subset of SOM+ interneurons located in so that project in turn to slm (Freund and Buzsaki, 1996). Thus, the small cohort of CGE-derived nNOS+ interneurons may represent interneuron targeting interneurons revealing a potential functional segregation between CGE- vs. MGE-derived nNOS+ cells. In addition, nNOS could be a useful marker to discriminate IS3 from the two other IS cell subtypes.

Dual origin of neurogliaform interneurons

Historically, NGCs have been viewed as a functionally homogenous interneuron subtype characterized by the expression of NPY with frequent coexpression of nNOS (Tamas et al., 2003; Price et al., 2005). Provided the NPY-GFP mice used for our initial characterization accurately report the total NGC population, we found that the nNOS+ subset, hence MGE derived, represents the majority of all hippocampal NGCs with a minor contribution from CGE derived NGCs. This contrasts with findings in the neocortex where fate-mapping evidence supports a dominant CGE origin for NGCs (Butt et al., 2005; Miyoshi et al., 2007); Miyoshi et al, submitted). Interestingly, our hippocampal CGE-derived population of NGCs is nNOS−, perhaps explaining the reduced level of nNOS in the neocortex (Yan and Garey, 1997; Lee and Jeon, 2005). This striking difference between neocortical and hippocampal NGCs suggests that interneuron precursors could be fated early during embryogenesis to reside in either the hippocampus or neocortex, perhaps reflecting differential sensitivities to specific sorting factors like chemokines (Li et al., 2008; Lopez-Bendito et al., 2008) that promote migration of nNOS+ NGC and IvC precursors into the hippocampus instead of stopping to enter the neocortex. Alternatively these cells may adopt a different fate depending on whether they integrate into the hippocampus or neocortex due to differential expression of morphogenic molecules within these local environments.

We also identified two groups of NGCs that originate from different ganglionic eminences but migrate to the same layer (slm) and adopt very similar electrophysiological, morphological, and molecular phenotypes. This leads to consideration of whether nNOS+ and nNOS− NGCs subserve different functions within the hippocampus. The opposite vasoactive properties of NO and NPY (Cauli et al., 2004) and the preferential location of NGCs in a blood vessel rich region (our observation and (Coyle, 1978; Price et al., 2005)) suggest that nNOS+ NGCs might have a central role in spatially coordinating hippocampal hemodynamics with changes in local circuit activity (Estrada and DeFelipe, 1998). Similarly, dual expression of NPY/nNOS could allow exquisite bidirectional regulation of synaptic transmission (Bacci et al., 2002; Garthwaite, 2008). In contrast, nNOS − NGCs would have more limited influence over local hemodynamics and synaptic activity. These differences could be particularly important if the two NGC cohorts exhibit distinct afferent/efferent connectivity.

Despite their distinct origins and differential nNOS expression CGE- and MGE-derived NGCs ultimately adopt indistinguishable morphological and electrophysiological properties with similar molecular profiles. This leads one to question the role of genetic specification versus local environment in controlling the integration and maturation of GABAergic neurons in the hippocampal network. For example, NPY expression is dependant upon neuronal activity (Marty, 2000) and its level in both NGC cohorts may be driven by the shared excitatory inputs from CA3 and entorhinal cortex (Price et al., 2005). By analogy the morphological and electrophysiological similarity between the two NGC groups could reflect sensitivity to a common morphogen present within slm. In contrast, nNOS expression could be largely predetermined by genetic programming at the embryonic progenitor level as the majority of nNOS+ interneurons belong to the same embryonic lineage. Such nature versus nurture influences upon the ultimate fate of post-migratory interneurons remain largely unexplored but may contribute to cortical interneuron diversity.

In conclusion, we employed a multiparametric approach to examine the diversity of hippocampal nNOS+ interneurons with particular emphasis on determining whether IvCs and NGCs can be distinguished upon combined electrophysiological, molecular, and developmental criteria. However, our findings do not provide evidence that these two groups can be parsed based on these parameters. Nonetheless, we cannot rule out the possibility that these two interneuron subpopulations perform distinct functions during network activity which would be dictated by their respective laminar organization and connectivity (Somogyi et al., 1998). Indeed, another classification scheme based on interneuron firing properties during discrete network activity patterns (Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008) may find temporally distinct contributions of IvCs and NGCs to circuit oscillations (Fuentealba et al., 2008b).

Supplementary Material



The authors thank Xiaoqing Yuan, Daniel Abebe and Helene Geoffroy (Ecole Superieure de Physique et Chimie Industrielles de Paris, France) for expert technical assistance. Microscopy imaging was performed at the Microscopy & Imaging Core (NICHD, NIH) with the assistance of Dr. Vincent Schram. This work was supported by an NICHD intramural award to C.J.M. Research in Fishell lab is supported by NIH grants (RO1NS039007, RO1MH07679) and generous support from the Simons Foundation and New York State through their NYSTEM initiative. BC is supported by a Human Frontier Science Program grant (HFSP, RGY0070/2007) and by a CNRS grant (“Nitrex”). L.T. is an NIH Visiting Fellow and a NIH/CNRS ECTA Fellow. G.M. was supported by a grant from the Japan Society for the promotion of Science. We thank Dr Betty A Eipper for supplying us with the NPY antibody and Dr Stewart A Anderson for providing us the Nkx2-1BAC-Cre driver line.


  • Anderson S, Mione M, Yun K, Rubenstein JL. Differential origins of neocortical projection and local circuit neurons: role of Dlx genes in neocortical interneuronogenesis. Cereb Cortex. 1999;9:646–654. [PubMed]
  • Anderson SA, Marin O, Horn C, Jennings K, Rubenstein JL. Distinct cortical migrations from the medial and lateral ganglionic eminences. Development. 2001;128:353–363. [PubMed]
  • Bacci A, Huguenard JR, Prince DA. Differential modulation of synaptic transmission by neuropeptide Y in rat neocortical neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:17125–17130. [PubMed]
  • Batista-Brito R, Fishell G. The developmental integration of cortical interneurons into a functional network. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;87:81–118. [PubMed]
  • Batista-Brito R, Machold R, Klein C, Fishell G. Gene expression in cortical interneuron precursors is prescient of their mature function. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:2306–2317. [PubMed]
  • Battiste J, Helms AW, Kim EJ, Savage TK, Lagace DC, Mandyam CD, Eisch AJ, Miyoshi G, Johnson JE. Ascl1 defines sequentially generated lineage-restricted neuronal and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the spinal cord. Development. 2007;134:285–293. [PubMed]
  • Butt SJ, Fuccillo M, Nery S, Noctor S, Kriegstein A, Corbin JG, Fishell G. The temporal and spatial origins of cortical interneurons predict their physiological subtype. Neuron. 2005;48:591–604. [PubMed]
  • Butt SJ, Sousa VH, Fuccillo MV, Hjerling-Leffler J, Miyoshi G, Kimura S, Fishell G. The requirement of Nkx2-1 in the temporal specification of cortical interneuron subtypes. Neuron. 2008;59:722–732. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cauli B, Tong XK, Rancillac A, Serluca N, Lambolez B, Rossier J, Hamel E. Cortical GABA interneurons in neurovascular coupling: relays for subcortical vasoactive pathways. J Neurosci. 2004;24:8940–8949. [PubMed]
  • Cauli B, Audinat E, Lambolez B, Angulo MC, Ropert N, Tsuzuki K, Hestrin S, Rossier J. Molecular and physiological diversity of cortical nonpyramidal cells. J Neurosci. 1997;17:3894–3906. [PubMed]
  • Cossart R, Bernard C, Ben-Ari Y. Multiple facets of GABAergic neurons and synapses: multiple fates of GABA signalling in epilepsies. Trends Neurosci. 2005;28:108–115. [PubMed]
  • Coyle P. Spatial features of the rat hippocampal vascular system. Exp Neurol. 1978;58:549–561. [PubMed]
  • Czeh B, Hajnal A, Seress L. NADPH-diaphorase positive neurons of the rat hippocampal formation: regional distribution, total number and colocalization with calcium binding proteins. Prague Med Rep. 2005;106:261–274. [PubMed]
  • Estrada C, DeFelipe J. Nitric oxide-producing neurons in the neocortex: morphological and functional relationship with intraparenchymal microvasculature. Cereb Cortex. 1998;8:193–203. [PubMed]
  • Flames N, Pla R, Gelman DM, Rubenstein JL, Puelles L, Marin O. Delineation of multiple subpallial progenitor domains by the combinatorial expression of transcriptional codes. J Neurosci. 2007;27:9682–9695. [PubMed]
  • Fogarty M, Grist M, Gelman D, Marin O, Pachnis V, Kessaris N. Spatial genetic patterning of the embryonic neuroepithelium generates GABAergic interneuron diversity in the adult cortex. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10935–10946. [PubMed]
  • Freund TF, Buzsaki G. Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1996;6:347–470. [PubMed]
  • Fuentealba P, Tomioka R, Dalezios Y, Marton LF, Studer M, Rockland K, Klausberger T, Somogyi P. Rhythmically active enkephalin-expressing GABAergic cells in the CA1 area of the hippocampus project to the subiculum and preferentially innervate interneurons. J Neurosci. 2008a;28:10017–10022. [PubMed]
  • Fuentealba P, Begum R, Capogna M, Jinno S, Marton LF, Csicsvari J, Thomson A, Somogyi P, Klausberger T. Ivy cells: a population of nitric-oxide-producing, slow-spiking GABAergic neurons and their involvement in hippocampal network activity. Neuron. 2008b;57:917–929. [PubMed]
  • Garthwaite J. Concepts of neural nitric oxide-mediated transmission. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:2783–2802. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gelman DM, Martini FJ, Nobrega-Pereira S, Pierani A, Kessaris N, Marin O. The embryonic preoptic area is a novel source of cortical GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9380–9389. [PubMed]
  • Guillemot F, Lo LC, Johnson JE, Auerbach A, Anderson DJ, Joyner AL. Mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 is required for the early development of olfactory and autonomic neurons. Cell. 1993;75:463–476. [PubMed]
  • Hanashima C, Shen L, Li SC, Lai E. Brain factor-1 controls the proliferation and differentiation of neocortical progenitor cells through independent mechanisms. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6526–6536. [PubMed]
  • Jinno S, Kosaka T. Patterns of expression of calcium binding proteins and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in different populations of hippocampal GABAergic neurons in mice. J Comp Neurol. 2002;449:1–25. [PubMed]
  • Joyner AL, Zervas M. Genetic inducible fate mapping in mouse: establishing genetic lineages and defining genetic neuroanatomy in the nervous system. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2376–2385. [PubMed]
  • Kanatani S, Yozu M, Tabata H, Nakajima K. COUP-TFII is preferentially expressed in the caudal ganglionic eminence and is involved in the caudal migratory stream. J Neurosci. 2008;28:13582–13591. [PubMed]
  • Karagiannis A, Gallopin T, David C, Battaglia D, Geoffroy H, Rossier J, Hillman EM, Staiger JF, Cauli B. Classification of NPY-expressing neocortical interneurons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:3642–3659. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kawaguchi Y. Physiological subgroups of nonpyramidal cells with specific morphological characteristics in layer II/III of rat frontal cortex. J Neurosci. 1995;15:2638–2655. [PubMed]
  • Klausberger T, Somogyi P. Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science. 2008;321:53–57. [PubMed]
  • Kusakabe T, Kawaguchi A, Hoshi N, Kawaguchi R, Hoshi S, Kimura S. Thyroid-specific enhancer-binding protein/NKX2.1 is required for the maintenance of ordered architecture and function of the differentiated thyroid. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20:1796–1809. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lambolez B, Audinat E, Bochet P, Crepel F, Rossier J. AMPA receptor subunits expressed by single Purkinje cells. Neuron. 1992;9:247–258. [PubMed]
  • Lavdas AA, Grigoriou M, Pachnis V, Parnavelas JG. The medial ganglionic eminence gives rise to a population of early neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7881–7888. [PubMed]
  • Lee JE, Jeon CJ. Immunocytochemical localization of nitric oxide synthase-containing neurons in mouse and rabbit visual cortex and co-localization with calcium-binding proteins. Mol Cells. 2005;19:408–417. [PubMed]
  • Levitt P, Eagleson KL, Powell EM. Regulation of neocortical interneuron development and the implications for neurodevelopmental disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:400–406. [PubMed]
  • Lewis DA, Hashimoto T, Volk DW. Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:312–324. [PubMed]
  • Li G, Adesnik H, Li J, Long J, Nicoll RA, Rubenstein JL, Pleasure SJ. Regional distribution of cortical interneurons and development of inhibitory tone are regulated by Cxcl12/Cxcr4 signaling. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1085–1098. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Liodis P, Denaxa M, Grigoriou M, Akufo-Addo C, Yanagawa Y, Pachnis V. Lhx6 activity is required for the normal migration and specification of cortical interneuron subtypes. J Neurosci. 2007;27:3078–3089. [PubMed]
  • Lopez-Bendito G, Sturgess K, Erdelyi F, Szabo G, Molnar Z, Paulsen O. Preferential origin and layer destination of GAD65-GFP cortical interneurons. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:1122–1133. [PubMed]
  • Lopez-Bendito G, Sanchez-Alcaniz JA, Pla R, Borrell V, Pico E, Valdeolmillos M, Marin O. Chemokine signaling controls intracortical migration and final distribution of GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1613–1624. [PubMed]
  • Lu QR, Sun T, Zhu Z, Ma N, Garcia M, Stiles CD, Rowitch DH. Common developmental requirement for Olig function indicates a motor neuron/oligodendrocyte connection. Cell. 2002;109:75–86. [PubMed]
  • Marty S. Differences in the regulation of neuropeptide Y, somatostatin and parvalbumin levels in hippocampal interneurons by neuronal activity and BDNF. Prog Brain Res. 2000;128:193–202. [PubMed]
  • Milgram SL, Chang EY, Mains RE. Processing and routing of a membrane-anchored form of proneuropeptide Y. Mol Endocrinol. 1996;10:837–846. [PubMed]
  • Miyoshi G, Butt SJ, Takebayashi H, Fishell G. Physiologically distinct temporal cohorts of cortical interneurons arise from telencephalic Olig2-expressing precursors. J Neurosci. 2007;27:7786–7798. [PubMed]
  • Morys JM, Kowianski P, Morys J. Distribution of nitric oxide synthase and neuropeptide Y neurones during the development of the hippocampal formation in the rat. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2002;61:221–232. [PubMed]
  • Nery S, Fishell G, Corbin JG. The caudal ganglionic eminence is a source of distinct cortical and subcortical cell populations. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:1279–1287. [PubMed]
  • Novak A, Guo C, Yang W, Nagy A, Lobe CG. Z/EG, a double reporter mouse line that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein upon Cre-mediated excision. Genesis. 2000;28:147–155. [PubMed]
  • Pinto S, Roseberry AG, Liu H, Diano S, Shanabrough M, Cai X, Friedman JM, Horvath TL. Rapid rewiring of arcuate nucleus feeding circuits by leptin. Science. 2004;304:110–115. [PubMed]
  • Pleasure SJ, Anderson S, Hevner R, Bagri A, Marin O, Lowenstein DH, Rubenstein JL. Cell migration from the ganglionic eminences is required for the development of hippocampal GABAergic interneurons. Neuron. 2000;28:727–740. [PubMed]
  • Porter JT, Cauli B, Staiger JF, Lambolez B, Rossier J, Audinat E. Properties of bipolar VIPergic interneurons and their excitation by pyramidal neurons in the rat neocortex. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:3617–3628. [PubMed]
  • Price CJ, Cauli B, Kovacs ER, Kulik A, Lambolez B, Shigemoto R, Capogna M. Neurogliaform neurons form a novel inhibitory network in the hippocampal CA1 area. J Neurosci. 2005;25:6775–6786. [PubMed]
  • Somogyi P, Klausberger T. Defined types of cortical interneurone structure space and spike timing in the hippocampus. J Physiol. 2005;562:9–26. [PubMed]
  • Somogyi P, Tamas G, Lujan R, Buhl EH. Salient features of synaptic organisation in the cerebral cortex. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998;26:113–135. [PubMed]
  • Soriano E, Del Rio JA, Martinez A, Super H. Organization of the embryonic and early postnatal murine hippocampus. I. Immunocytochemical characterization of neuronal populations in the subplate and marginal zone. J Comp Neurol. 1994;342:571–595. [PubMed]
  • Sousa VH, Miyoshi G, Hjerling-Leffler J, Karayannis T, Fishell G. Characterization of Nkx6-2-derived neocortical interneuron lineages. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(Suppl 1):i1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stuart G, Hausser M. Initiation and spread of sodium action potentials in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuron. 1994;13:703–712. [PubMed]
  • Sussel L, Marin O, Kimura S, Rubenstein JL. Loss of Nkx2.1 homeobox gene function results in a ventral to dorsal molecular respecification within the basal telencephalon: evidence for a transformation of the pallidum into the striatum. Development. 1999;126:3359–3370. [PubMed]
  • Szabadics J, Soltesz I. Functional specificity of mossy fiber innervation of GABAergic cells in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2009;29:4239–4251. [PubMed]
  • Szabadics J, Tamas G, Soltesz I. Different transmitter transients underlie presynaptic cell type specificity of GABAA, slow and GABAA, fast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14831–14836. [PubMed]
  • Takebayashi H, Nabeshima Y, Yoshida S, Chisaka O, Ikenaka K, Nabeshima Y. The basic helix-loop-helix factor olig2 is essential for the development of motoneuron and oligodendrocyte lineages. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1157–1163. [PubMed]
  • Tamas G, Lorincz A, Simon A, Szabadics J. Identified sources and targets of slow inhibition in the neocortex. Science. 2003;299:1902–1905. [PubMed]
  • van den Pol AN, Yao Y, Fu LY, Foo K, Huang H, Coppari R, Lowell BB, Broberger C. Neuromedin B and gastrin-releasing peptide excite arcuate nucleus neuropeptide Y neurons in a novel transgenic mouse expressing strong Renilla green fluorescent protein in NPY neurons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:4622–4639. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vida I, Halasy K, Szinyei C, Somogyi P, Buhl EH. Unitary IPSPs evoked by interneurons at the stratum radiatum-stratum lacunosum-moleculare border in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol. 1998;506(Pt 3):755–773. [PubMed]
  • Wichterle H, Turnbull DH, Nery S, Fishell G, Alvarez-Buylla A. In utero fate mapping reveals distinct migratory pathways and fates of neurons born in the mammalian basal forebrain. Development. 2001;128:3759–3771. [PubMed]
  • Willi-Monnerat S, Migliavacca E, Surdez D, Delorenzi M, Luthi-Carter R, Terskikh AV. Comprehensive spatiotemporal transcriptomic analyses of the ganglionic eminences demonstrate the uniqueness of its caudal subdivision. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008;37:845–856. [PubMed]
  • Wonders CP, Anderson SA. The origin and specification of cortical interneurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:687–696. [PubMed]
  • Wonders CP, Taylor L, Welagen J, Mbata IC, Xiang JZ, Anderson SA. A spatial bias for the origins of interneuron subgroups within the medial ganglionic eminence. Dev Biol. 2008;314:127–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Xu Q, Wonders CP, Anderson SA. Sonic hedgehog maintains the identity of cortical interneuron progenitors in the ventral telencephalon. Development. 2005;132:4987–4998. [PubMed]
  • Xu Q, Tam M, Anderson SA. Fate mapping Nkx2.1-lineage cells in the mouse telencephalon. J Comp Neurol. 2008;506:16–29. [PubMed]
  • Xu Q, Cobos I, De La Cruz E, Rubenstein JL, Anderson SA. Origins of cortical interneuron subtypes. J Neurosci. 2004;24:2612–2622. [PubMed]
  • Xu X, Callaway EM. Laminar specificity of functional input to distinct types of inhibitory cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:70–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yan XX, Garey LJ. Morphological diversity of nitric oxide synthesising neurons in mammalian cerebral cortex. J Hirnforsch. 1997;38:165–172. [PubMed]
  • Zhao Y, Flandin P, Long JE, Cuesta MD, Westphal H, Rubenstein JL. Distinct molecular pathways for development of telencephalic interneuron subtypes revealed through analysis of Lhx6 mutants. J Comp Neurol. 2008;510:79–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zsiros V, Maccaferri G. Electrical coupling between interneurons with different excitable properties in the stratum lacunosum-moleculare of the juvenile CA1 rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8686–8695. [PubMed]