Microbial pathogens use varied adaptive mechanisms to survive the harsh conditions of the infected host.
Cryptococcus neoformans creates a polysaccharide capsule in response to host conditions such as low iron and high CO
2 concentrations
[1],
[24]. The
C. neoformans genome contains a number of genes involved in the biosynthesis of this capsule, and many of these genes are highly transcriptionally regulated, at least partially in response to the PKA pathway
[38]. This led us to screen through the genome for transcription factors that are potentially regulated by PKA, and we previously found that the Nrg1 protein regulates capsule. Deletion of the
NRG1 gene resulted in a partial capsule reduction, and mutation of the putative PKA phosphorylation consensus sequence prevented full capsule induction. However, not all of the transcriptionally regulated capsule genes appeared to be targets for Nrg1, and many of the
nrg1Δ mutant phenotypes were not as severe as mutations in the more upstream components of the cAMP pathway
[37]. Therefore, we hypothesized that several transcriptional regulators would control capsule gene induction in response to the PKA pathway. Using a combination of bioinformatic and phenotypic screening, we identified the
C. neoformans Rim101 protein as another potential novel PKA-dependent transcriptional regulator of capsule genes.
We hypothesized that the
C. neoformans Rim101 protein may be a target of direct PKA phosphorylation due to the presence of a consensus sequence for PKA phosphorylation at amino acid positions 730–736. In contrast, the previously described
C. albicans and
S. cerevisiae Rim101 proteins do not contain potential PKA phosphorylation consensus sequences. However, there are multiple ways in which PKA can regulate downstream targets, including indirect activation of upstream regulatory proteins as well as by occupying the chromatin of the target genes
[72]. Our bioinformatic approach, therefore, does not identify all of the targets of PKA, but does allow us to potentially identify direct targets of PKA phosphorylation.
To determine the relationship between Rim101 and PKA, we used complementary genetic, biochemical, and protein localization experiments. Our results suggest that PKA and Rim20 are necessary for maintenance of Rim101 nuclear localization by altering the cleavage of this transcription factor. Rim20 has been previously implicated in the first cleavage of Rim101, by binding to PEST domains, which are also present in
C. neoformans Rim101
[43],
[45]. In contrast to the predominantly nuclear localization of Rim101 in wild-type cells, we observed both nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of this protein in the
pka1 and
rim20 mutant strain backgrounds. We also observed both nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of the Rim101-S773A mutant protein with a putative PKA phosphorylation consensus sequence mutation. In addition, the GFP-tagged Rim101 protein in all of these strains had decreased electrophoretic mobility when compared to the
rim101Δ+Gfp-RIM101 strain. The larger band is not due to hyperphosphorylation as this mobility shift was not reversed by treatment with phosphatase. Together, these data indicate that both the cAMP/PKA pathway and the Rim pathway are involved in
C. neoformans Rim101 processing and cellular localization.
In
Aspergillus and
Candida, PacC/Rim101 is activated by two cleavage events, first mediated Rim20 and Rim13 and second by the proteosome
[43],
[45],
[53]. We demonstrate that
C. neoformans Rim101 activation may also occur in response to two protein cleavage events, as the Rim101 protein is further cleaved from the 120kD form to a 70kD form in capsule inducing conditions. This further cleavage was not observed when
PKA1 or
RIM20 were disrupted, suggesting that the initial cleavage to 120 kD is necessary for further processing and activation of Rim101. The multiple smaller bands/laddering observed when
PKA1 or
RIM20 are disrupted may indicate altered proteosome-mediated processing events, suggesting that both Pka1 and Rim20 are necessary to cause appropriate proteosomal involvement and maintain the balance between processing and degradation. This is consistent with data from
A. nidulans, where PacC is first converted by PalB and PalA under alkaline conditions to a 53kD intermediate which exposes the second processing site to the proteosome
[53]. Hervas-Aguilar et al. also demonstrated that phosphorylation can accumulate on the 72 and 53kD PacC intermediates during alkaline conditions and affect processing. This is consistent with our results that PKA is involved in regulating processing of Rim101 in
C. neoformans, although there is large divergence in the C-terminal and in the potential signaling motifs between these orthologous proteins in these distantly related species. Interestingly, capsule-inducing conditions are not alkaline and thus are not a traditional activating condition for Rim101 proteins. Therefore, CnRim101 may have acquired novel activating conditions in order to respond to the specific host conditions experienced by cryptococcal cells
in vivo.
When we examined the targets of Rim101 transcriptional activation, we found that many Rim101 downstream targets and responses from other pathogenic fungi, such as
C. albicans, are conserved in
C. neoformans. We demonstrated that CnRim101 is important for growth under alkaline conditions
in vitro. Using comparative transcriptional profiling, we determined that
ENA1, a known downstream target of Rim101 in other fungal species, showed decreased expression in the
rim101Δ mutant strain (). The promoter of the
ENA1 gene also had a conserved predicted Rim101 binding sequence, suggesting that it might be a direct target of Rim101 in
C. neoformans, unlike in
S. cerevisiae, where Rim101 regulates
ENA1 through Nrg1
[37]. Idnurm et al. showed that Ena1 is required for
C. neoformans survival under alkaline conditions, and that appropriate response to alkaline conditions is necessary for virulence of
C. neoformans [73]. Therefore, decreased expression of
ENA1 in the
rim101Δ mutant strain may explain the defect in alkaline growth of the
rim101Δ mutant.
Extracellular pH is involved in regulating iron uptake genes through the Rim101 pathway in
C. albicans and
S. cerevisiae [3],
[5]–
[7],
[15],
[23],
[25]. The relationship between iron homeostasis and Rim101 is also conserved in
C. neoformans. In order to determine the mechanism for the
rim101Δ mutant strain sensitivity to low iron, we compared the transcriptional profile between wild-type and the
rim101Δ mutant strain after incubation in capsule-inducing conditions. Our microarray analysis concluded that a number of iron homeostasis genes are differentially regulated between the
rim101Δ mutant and the wild-type and we confirmed these alterations in gene expression using quantitative real-time PCR. When we examined the putative promoter regions of the candidate genes, we discovered potential Rim101 consensus binding sequences in
CFT1, FET3, and
SIT1 among others, suggesting these genes are direct targets of Rim101. Similarly, in
C. albicans, Rim101 binds directly to the promoter region of the ferric reductase genes
FRE1 and
FRP1 to cause increased transcription under iron-limited environments
[23].
In
C. neoformans, iron uptake is regulated by two pathways: PKA and Cir1. Transcriptional profiling showed that many iron genes, such as the iron permease Cft1 and reductase Cfo1 are differentially regulated by PKA
[24],
[26],
[60],
[61]. We have demonstrated that Rim101 is regulated by PKA, thus providing a mechanism for PKA regulation of these iron genes. However, in our transcriptional profiling, we did not demonstrate any difference in expression of Cir1 in the
rim101Δ mutant strain, further suggesting that there are two pathways that regulate iron homeostasis. In
C. albicans, two signaling pathways regulate iron homeostasis in response to different forms of iron limitation. In
C. albicans, the ferric reductase gene
FRP1 is differentially regulated by Rim101 and by CBF transcription factors in response to different forms of iron limitation
[23]. It is possible that
C. neoformans has a similar set of transcription factors to regulate the expression of these iron homeostasis genes under different iron-limiting environments, and that the cell uses both Cir1 and Rim101 to regulate the expression of Cft1 under different environmental stimuli and iron source limitations.
Despite the decreased surface capsule observed in the
rim101Δ mutant cells when stained with India ink, this strain was still able to secrete glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) at a similar size and concentration as wild type when the cells were grown in capsule inducing conditions. This data does not preclude other differences in structure and modifications to the GXM in the mutant strain. In accordance with the amount of secreted polysaccharide from the
rim101Δ mutant strain, our transcriptional profiling revealed that few capsule biosynthesis genes are transcriptionally regulated by Rim101. In the
rim101Δ mutant strain we observed decreased expression of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase Ugd1, mannosyltransferase Cmt1, and phosphomannomutase
[55]–
[58]. Unlike the iron uptake genes, these capsule biosynthesis genes do not have conserved Rim101 binding sites in the promoter regions, suggesting that these are not direct targets of Rim101. Therefore, our data indicates that CnRim101 is required for the transcriptional activation of some genes involved in capsule biosynthesis; however, the most important effects of Rim101 on capsule are likely due to changes in polysaccharide binding to the cell surface. We hypothesize that Rim101 regulates capsule by altering the expression of genes responsible for anchoring capsule to the cell wall, rather than acting as a direct regulator of these capsule biosynthesis genes.
Unexpectedly for an acapsular strain, the
rim101Δ mutant displayed no attenuation in virulence in the mouse inhalation model of cryptococcosis. This confirms prior broad screening experiments of
C. neoformans mutants to identify genes required for survival within mice
[39]. In these studies, the
rim101Δ strain was slightly more virulent than wild-type, as we demonstrated here. Follow-up experiments determining fungal load in the brain, lung, and spleen showed no defects in dissemination. When Rim101 is mutated in
Candida, the resulting strains are avirulent as Rim101 regulates processes necessary for fungal virulence
[3],
[14],
[19]. In a fungal pathogen of plants,
Fusarium oxysporum, a
rim101Δ mutant strain is more virulent than wild-type due to the derepression of acid response genes conferring a survival advantage in the acidic host environment of the tomato
[2]. Similarly, our data indicates that the
C. neoformans rim101Δ mutant grows better than wild-type within the acidic phagolysosome of the activated macrophage
[29],
[74]. Perhaps the derepression of acid responsive genes in the
rim101Δ mutant could explain the increased growth within the acidic phagolysosome and thus within the lungs of the infected host. Another explanation for the retained virulence of the
rim101Δ mutant strain is that the capsular polysaccharide may be shed into the surrounding tissues. This capsular material has well defined immunosuppressant effects. Capsular polysaccharide has even recently been used as an experimental therapy for autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis
[75]. Therefore, the retained virulence may be attributed to the profound immunomodulatory effects of strains that produce and secrete large amounts of capsule. Also, not all capsule-defective
C. neoformans strains are hypovirulent in model systems. The acapsular
ags1Δ mutant is fully virulent in the nematode model of cryptococcosis, although sensitive to temperature and thus avirulent in the mouse
[49],
[50]. The virulence of these strains suggests that capsule may be playing an important role in suppressing the immune system, even when not bound to the cell as an anti-phagocytic mechanism.
It is also possible that the hypocapsular
rim101Δ mutant may present an altered cell surface for immune recognition, exposing different antigens resulting in a substantively different immune response than for an encapsulated WT strain. In this model, the increased virulence might result from alterations of the exposed
C. neoformans surface antigens leading to over-stimulation of the immune system, such as seen in the response to β-glucan in the
C. albicans cell wall
[76],
[77]. In our microarray data we observed increased expression of MP88 and MP98, two immuno-dominant mannoproteins, in the
rim101Δ mutant strain, further supporting a model of an altered antigen surface on the fungus as a result of absent Rim101 activity
[78],
[79]. MP88 has also been documented as having increased expression in a
pka1Δ mutant strain, which may be due to decreased Rim101 activity
[60]. A more detailed evaluation of the nature of this cellular infiltration into the infected lungs will help define the varied immune response to different
C. neoformans strains.
In summary, we have demonstrated that the C. neoformans Rim101 transcription factor retains conserved functions with orthologous proteins from other fungal species, such as regulation of pH response, cell wall formation, and iron homeostasis. However, the phenotypic output resulting from a C. neoformans Rim101 mutation supports the hypothesis that this conserved protein has been co-opted for unique, species-specific function. In contrast to other fungal species such as Candida or Aspergillus that have adapted to the neutral/alkaline pH of the host lungs and use Rim101 as an inducing signal for virulence, C. neoformans may be better adapted for acidic microenvironments in the host, such as the macrophage phagolysosome. Moreover, our experiments demonstrating PKA regulation of CnRim101 further suggests that conserved signaling elements can be regulated in novel ways to allow adaptation of microorganisms to specific niches in the environment of the infected host.