|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
The cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody is a popular tool in apoptosis research in Drosophila. Because the antibody was raised against cleaved human Caspase-3, it was assumed that it detects cleaved DRICE and DCP-1, Caspase-3-like effector caspases in Drosophila. However, as shown here strong immunoreactivity persists in apoptotic models doubly mutant for drICE and dcp-1. In contrast, mutants of the apoptosome components DRONC (Caspase-9-like) and ARK (Apaf-1 related) do not label with cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody. By peptide blocking experiments and further genetic studies, we provide evidence that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody recognizes multiple proteins including DCP-1 and likely DRICE, but also at least one additional unknown protein, all of which require DRONC for epitope exposure. The unknown substrate may be involved in non-apoptotic functions of DRONC. Because the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody not only detects cleaved Caspase-3-like proteins in Drosophila, but also other proteins in a DRONC-dependent manner, it is more accurate to consider the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody as a marker for DRONC activity, rather than effector caspase activity.
The cleaved-Caspase-3 (Asp175) Antibody (referred to as cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody) from Cell Signaling Technology is a polyclonal antibody obtained in Rabbit that was raised against a peptide in the large subunit of the human effector caspase, Caspase-3, amino-terminal to Asp175.1 The antibody does not detect unprocessed Caspase-3. However, after proteolytic cleavage between Asp175 and Ser176, separating the large and small subunits leading to activation of Caspase-3, the epitope is exposed and can be detected by cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody, making the antibody a marker for cleaved and thus active Caspase-3 in dying cells. A similar antibody, termed CM1, has previously been described;2, 3 however, the CM1 antibody is no longer available and is not subject of this analysis.
Apoptosis in Drosophila is under control of the pro-apoptotic genes reaper, hid and grim.4-6 (reviewed in 7) The products of these genes trigger apoptosis through induction of proteolytic degradation of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), most notably DIAP1,8-11 to activate a caspase program. Of the seven caspase genes in Drosophila,7 only the putative initiator caspase DRONC which is most similar to mammalian Caspase-9, and the Caspase-3-like effector caspases DRICE and DCP-1 have been implicated in developmental apoptosis.12-18 After release from DIAP1 inhibition, DRONC becomes part of the apoptosome through interaction with ARK, also known as HAC-1 and D-APAF-1, the APAF-1-related gene in Drosophila.19-21 The apoptosome cleaves and activates the effector caspases DCP-1 and DRICE.
The cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody has become a very popular tool for detection of dying cells in Drosophila (see for example references 3, 13, 22-27). Because it has been raised against an epitope of human Caspase-3, it was proposed that the antibody would cross-react with cleaved Caspase-3-like effector caspases DRICE and DCP-1 in Drosophila.3 However, this has never been rigorously tested. Preciously, it was shown that the antibody does not loose its immunoreactivity in drICE single mutants15 suggesting that it is not specific for cleaved DRICE. However, partial redundancy with DCP-1 (ref. 13) may account for this result. Here, we show that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody still labels cells induced to die which are double mutant for defined null alleles of dcp-1 and drICE. In contrast, the antibody requires the activity of the apoptosome components DRONC and ARK for immunoreactivity. Subsequent analysis demonstrates that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody detects at least one additional putative DRONC substrate which may be involved in non-apoptotic processes. Because the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody is not entirely specific for cleaved DRICE and DCP-1, but requires DRONC for its immunoreactivity, we propose that it is more accurate to refer to this antibody as a marker of DRONC activity in Drosophila.
To evaluate the specificity of the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody, we analyzed eye imaginal discs from third instar larvae. In wild-type eye imaginal discs, the antibody detects a few dying cells scattered throughout the disc (Figure 1a). Surprisingly, in eye discs doubly mutant for the null alleles dcp-1Prev and drICEΔ1 (ref. 14, 15), the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody still labels cells (Figure 1b). Labeling in dcp-1Prev drICEΔ1 double mutants occurs in clusters (Figure 1b), similar to what has been observed previously when cell death was blocked by expression of the Caspase-3 inhibitor P35.3 These observations would suggest that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody still detects an epitope in the absence of the Caspase-3-like proteins DCP-1 and DRICE. Nevertheless, because apoptosis at this stage does not occur in a defined pattern, we were uncertain about the specificity of these labeling signals.
Therefore, we used GMR-hid transgenes, a well characterized apoptotic model,5 to further examine the specificity of the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody. Through GMR-driven expression of the pro-apoptotic gene hid specifically in the posterior half of the developing eye, GMR-hid transgenes induce apoptosis in two distinct waves as shown by cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody and TUNEL labeling28 (Figure 1c,d). To evaluate the specificity of the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody, we examined GMR-hid eye discs which were doubly mutant for dcp-1Prev and drICEΔ1. Consistent with the expectation, loss of dcp-1Prev and drICEΔ1 completely abrogates TUNEL-positive apoptosis in GMR-hid discs (Figure 1f). Surprisingly, however, dcp-1Prev drICEΔ1 double mutant GMR-hid eye discs still showed strong immunoreactivity with cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody (Figure 1e). Thus, the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody does not or not only detect DRICE and/or DCP-1. We do note, though, that the labeling appearance of the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody changes in the absence of DCP-1 and DRICE (compare Figure 1c and 1e). The labeling signal is no longer restricted to two distinct waves (Figure 1c), but rather fills the entire posterior compartment of the eye disc and is confined to interommatidial cells (Figure 1e). A similar change of labeling pattern has been reported for CM1 antibody labeling upon expression of the caspase inhibitor P35.3 This change of the labeling pattern is likely due to the fact that cells in dcp-1Prev drICEΔ1 double mutant GMR-hid eye discs do not die (Figure 1f) and thus maintain the epitope detected by cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody. Importantly, however, this analysis demonstrates that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody still detects an epitope in the absence of the Caspase-3-like proteins DCP-1 and DRICE.
There are two possibilities why the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody labels dcp-1 drICE double mutant cells, although they are not apoptotic. First, the antibody may not detect an apoptotic epitope; or second, the antibody may detect an apoptotic epitope generated upstream or in parallel to DCP-1 and DRICE. To distinguish between these possibilities, we examined GMR-hid eye discs mutant for the apoptosome components DRONC and ARK, which act upstream of DRICE and DCP-1. In dronc and ark mutant GMR-hid eye discs, both TUNEL and cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody labelings are blocked (Figure 1g,h; Figure 3a,b). These data confirm that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody indeed detects an apoptotic epitope in Drosophila. Furthermore, because it fails to detect the apoptotic epitope in dronc and ark mutants, but not in dcp-1 drice double mutants, it is more accurate to consider the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody as a marker for DRONC activity, rather than effector caspase activity, in dying Drosophila cells.
The epitope detected by the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody depends on DRONC activity. It may be possible that the antibody directly recognizes activated DRONC. Alternatively, it is also possible that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody detects an epitope generated through cleavage of an unknown substrate by active DRONC, independently of DRICE and DCP-1.
To distinguish between these two possibilities, we aligned the residues from the catalytic Cysteine (Cys163) to the cleavage site at Asp175 of human Caspase-3 (Caspase-3 peptide) with the corresponding regions of the Drosophila caspases (Figure 2a; see also ref. 3). The most C-terminal residues of the Caspase-3 peptide, ETD, are conserved in DRICE and DCP-1 (Figure 2a). Similar to Caspase-3, this is the cleavage site for activation of at least DRICE,29 and possibly DCP-1. Interestingly, the N-terminal two-third of the Caspase-3 peptide bears highest similarity to DRONC: six out of nine residues are conserved (Figure 2a). This part of the Caspase-3 peptide is less well conserved in DRICE, DCP-1 and the remaining Drosophila caspases. Although cleavage between the large and small subunits of DRONC is not necessary for its activity,30, 31 and may not occur in vivo, we considered the possibility that antibodies directed against the N-terminal part of the Caspase-3 peptide may directly detect active DRONC in dying cells.
We used blocking peptides to evaluate which epitopes of the Caspase-3 peptide are detected by the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody in dying Drosophila cells. The sequences of the blocking peptides are shown in Figure 2b and underlined in Figure 2a. Blocking peptide A (TETD) is derived from DRICE and DCP-1 and blocking peptide B (CRGDEYDLG) corresponds to the region of highest similarity in DRONC (Figure 2a,b). Peptide C is a control peptide corresponding to the residues immediately adjacent to peptide B in DRONC (Figure 2a,b). Peptide D is another control peptide which is very similar to peptide A and is derived from the prodomain of DRONC at position 113. If the prodomain of DRONC is cleaved at this site, it will expose ESD at its C-terminus which is very similar to the C-terminus of the Caspase-3 peptide (ETD, peptide A) and thus may be detected by the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody.
The blocking peptides were mixed with the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody sixty minutes before incubation with the eye imaginal discs. The results of the blocking experiments are summarized in Figure 2b, and for peptides A and B shown in Figure 2c-f. Peptide A is sufficient to block the entire immunoreactivity of the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody in GMR-hid and in dcp-1 drICE double mutant GMR-hid eye discs (Figure 2c,d). In contrast, peptide B does not abrogate immunoreactivity of the antibody in these discs (Figure 2e,f). The control peptides C and D also fail to block cleaved-Caspase-3 immunoreactivity (Figure 2b; data not shown).
These data demonstrate that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody specifically detects the epitope ETD in apoptotic cells. Among the Drosophila caspases, this epitope is only present in DRICE and DCP-1, making it very likely that the antibody does indeed detect these effector caspases. In contrast, the fact that the DRONC-derived peptides B, C and D fail to block immunoreactivity suggest that it is unlikely that the antibody directly detects active DRONC. Therefore, because the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody does not lose immunoreactivity in dcp-1 drICE double mutants (Figure 1e), it detects at least one other protein which exposes the ETD epitope in a DRONC-dependent manner.
The analysis presented in Figure 2 suggests, but does not prove, that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody does indeed detect cleaved DCP-1 and DRICE. To directly test this possibility, we expressed a GMR-ΔN-dcp-1 transgene in ark mutant background. ΔN-dcp-1 lacks the N-terminal prodomain of DCP-1. It is thought that prodomain-depleted ΔN-DCP-1 readily promotes autoprocessing, and consistently expression under GMR control induces an eye ablation phenotype.32 This eye ablation phenotype is caused by induction of apoptosis (Figure 3c,d). As mentioned above, ark mutant clones in GMR-hid background fail to induce TUNEL-positive apoptosis (Figure 3b’) and the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody does not have any immunoreactivity in ark clones (Figure 3a’) suggesting that neither DCP-1 nor DRICE nor the unknown DRONC substrates are cleaved in ark mutant clones. Therefore, we tested whether expression of ΔN-Dcp-1 in the absence of apoptosome activity, i.e. in ark clones, can restore cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody labeling. Compared to wild-type tissue (marked by GFP in Figure 3c,c’), the number of cleaved-Caspase-3 positive cells is strongly reduced in ark mutant clones (Figure 3c,c’) suggesting that activation of ΔN-DCP-1 is at least partially dependent on the apoptosome. However, about 50% of ark mutant clones (n=32) in GMR-ΔN-Dcp-1 background contain cleaved-Caspase-3 immunoreactive cells (arrows in Figure 3c, c’). This is unlikely to be a labeling artifact, because these cells also are TUNEL-positive (Figure 3d, d’). Therefore, because DRONC is inactive in ark mutant background suggesting that the cleaved-Caspase-3 labeling signal is not caused by the unknown DRONC substrate, this analysis demonstrates that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody does indeed detect cleaved DCP-1. It is also possible that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody detects cleaved DRICE in this experiment, because DCP-1 can proteolytically process DRICE, at least in vitro.29, 32 A similar analysis with DRICE could not be performed because GMR-drICE and GMR-ΔN-drICE do not cause an eye ablation phenotype.32 Nevertheless, whether DCP-1 cleaves DRICE in vivo or not, given the sequence similarity of DCP-1 and DRICE at the C-terminus of the large subunit and the peptide blocking data of Figure 2, it suggests that the antibody may also detect cleaved DRICE.
The findings of this study are summarized in Figure 4. In addition to DCP-1 and likely DRICE, the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody also recognizes at least one, perhaps even several additional proteins containing the ETD epitope. Because exposure of this epitope is dependent on apoptosome activity, it is very likely that the protein is a substrate of DRONC. However, cleavage of this protein by DRONC is not sufficient to induce apoptosis because dcp-1 drICE double mutants in which this epitope is present, are not apoptotic (Figure 1e,f). Consistently, this protein is unlikely to be a caspase because none of the remaining Drosophila caspases carries the ETD epitope (Figure 2a).
Nevertheless, these findings are interesting from a different point of view. In addition to induction of apoptosis, DRONC and caspases in general also have non-apoptotic functions (reviewed in 33). For example, apoptosis-induced compensatory proliferation is dependent on a non-apoptotic function of DRONC.16, 34, 35 It is currently unknown how DRONC is mediating this response. Identification of DRONC substrates involved in non-apoptotic functions may be very helpful in elucidating the mechanism by which DRONC exerts its non-apoptotic functions. Unfortunately, database searches using ETD as query to identify potential non-apoptotic DRONC substrates were not successful. Other approaches such as immunoprecipitation using the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody will be necessary to identify this substrate.
This study also demonstrates that caution should be taken about the specificity of antibodies. As shown here in Drosophila, it is likely that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody not only detects cleaved Caspase-3 in mammals, but also additional proteins containing the ETD epitope. In Drosophila, exposure of this epitope is apoptosome-dependent and thus the antibody is a useful reagent for detecting apoptosis. But in other model organisms this may not be the case and may result in mis-interpretations.
In summary, we demonstrated in this paper that the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody not only detects active effector caspases DRICE and DCP-1 in apoptotic cells in Drosophila, but also additional potential DRONC substrates which may be involved in non-apoptotic processes. Therefore, we propose that it is most useful to interpret the labeling information obtained with the cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody as activity of the Caspase-9-like initiator caspase DRONC in Drosophila.
The cleaved-Caspase-3 (Asp175) Antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Catalog #9661).1 GMR-hid, GMR-ΔN-dcp-1, droncI24, arkG8, driceΔ1 and dcp-1Prev are described elsewhere.5, 12, 14, 15, 32, 36 For details about making ark clones, see Srivastava et al. (ref. 36). Immunohistochemistry and TUNEL labeling was done as described.22, 28, 37 Photographs were taken by confocal microscopy.
Blocking peptides A, B, C, and D were obtained from ProImmune Inc. They were dissolved in a small amount of 0.1% ammonium bicarbonate and diluted to a final concentration of 1mg/ml with sterile, distilled water according to manufacturers instructions. 1 ul of the peptide solutions was mixed with 1ul of cleaved-Caspase-3 antibody in labeling solution for sixty minutes at room temperature before incubation with the eye discs.
We would like to thank Kim McCall, Hermann Steller and Bruce Hay for fly stocks. This work was supported by the NIH (GM068016, GM081543, GM074977) and The Welch Foundation (G-1496).