|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Receptor (Type II) taste bud cells secrete ATP during taste stimulation. In turn, ATP activates adjacent Presynaptic (Type III) cells to release serotonin (5 hydroxytryptamine, or 5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE). The roles of these neurotransmitters in taste buds have not been fully elucidated. Here we tested whether ATP or 5-HT exert feedback onto Receptor (Type II) cells during taste stimulation. Our previous studies showed NE does not appear to act on adjacent taste bud cells, or at least on Receptor cells. Our data show that 5-HT released from Presynaptic (Type III) cells provides negative paracrine feedback onto Receptor cells by activating 5-HT1A receptors, inhibiting taste-evoked Ca2+ mobilization in Receptor cells and reducing ATP secretion. The findings also demonstrate that ATP exerts positive autocrine feedback onto Receptor (Type II) cells by activating P2Y1 receptors and enhancing ATP secretion. These results begin to sort out how purinergic and aminergic transmitters function within the taste bud to modulate gustatory signalling in these peripheral sensory organs.
Taste buds are specialized sensory organs that transduce chemical stimuli into signals that are transmitted to the central nervous system via primary gustatory afferent fibers. Several neurotransmitters have been proposed for synapses in taste buds, including serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), glutamate, acetylcholine, ATP, CCK, and neuropeptide Y (Nagahama and Kurihara, 1985; Nagai et al., 1998; Ogura 2002; Lu et al., 2003; Kaya et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2005; Zhao et al., 2005; Finger et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2007; Romanov et al., 2007). However, only 5-HT, NE and ATP have been unambiguously identified and shown to be released (Finger et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2005, 2007, 2008; Romanov et al., 2007). ATP is believed to excite gustatory primary afferent fibers and adjacent cells in the taste bud (Finger et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2007). Yet, purinoceptors are widely expressed in many taste cells (Kim et al., 2000; Baryshnikov et al., 2003; Bystrova et al., 2006; Hayato et al., 2007) and thus there may be additional targets for ATP within the taste bud. One goal of our paper is to characterize purinergic signaling in mouse taste buds and identify additional roles for ATP.
Similarly, the role of 5-HT in taste buds remains enigmatic. Injecting 5-HT into the lingual artery excited primary gustatory afferent fibers, implicating 5-HT at synapses between taste buds and sensory afferent axons (Esakov et al., 1983). Findings from simultaneous impalements of adjacent cells in amphibian taste buds suggested serotonergic signaling between taste cells (Ewald and Roper, 1994). Herness and co-workers reported actions of 5-HT in rat taste buds and expression of 5-HT receptors that also led them to conclude serotonin is a paracrine neurotransmitter (Kaya et al., 2004). Lastly, Heath et al. (2006) and O'Driscoll et al., (2008) showed that altering peripheral 5-HT in human subjects changed taste thresholds for sweet and bitter, presumably by acting on taste bud cells. Thus, a second goal of our report was to examine the detailed actions of 5-HT in mammalian taste buds.
There are multiple taste bud cell types involved in taste reception: Types I, II, and III (Yee et al., 2001; Clapp et al., 2006; DeFazio et al., 2006). Type I taste cells express a glutamate transporter (Lawton et al., 2000) and an ecto-ATPase (Bartel et al., 2006), suggesting they are involved in clearing neurotransmitters. Type I cells also express amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels and inward-rectifying K+ channels, implicating roles in Na+ sensing and K+ redistribution (Vandenbeuch et al., 2008a; Dvoryanchikov et al., 2009). Type II (Receptor) cells express taste G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and transduce sweet, bitter, or umami taste stimuli, but they do not form conventional synapses. In response to taste stimulation, Receptor cells secrete ATP. In contrast with Receptor cells, Type III (Presynaptic) taste cells do not have GPCRs for taste stimuli but they possess synaptic specializations and express synapse-related proteins (Yang et al., 2000; DeFazio et al., 2006). Presynaptic cells are excited by ATP secreted by Receptor cells during taste stimulation. Presynaptic cells release 5-HT and NE when stimulated. In short, there are different transmitter systems and at least three categories of taste bud cells that are directly involved in taste signalling. Important synaptic interactions between these cells may be present.
In the present report, we use biosensor detection of neurotransmitter secretion to investigate cell-cell interactions between identified Receptor and Presynaptic taste cells, and specifically the roles of 5-HT and ATP in mediating negative and positive feedback on intercellular signaling.
An abstract of the findings was presented as a poster at the annual meeting of the Assoc for Chemoreception Sciences, April 2009 (Huang et al., 2009).
Adult mice of either sex were used in this study. We used wild type and transgenic mice in the experiments, as indicated in Results, including P2Y4-null mice (Taconic #TF0516, generated on a 129/SvEv-C57BL/6 background); P2Y1/P2Y2 double knockout mice (Geary et al., 2005); transgenic mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) under control of the PLCβ2 promoter (PLCβ2-GFP) (Kim et al., 2006); and transgenic mice expressing GFP under the GAD67 promoter (GAD-GFP) (Chattopadhyaya et al., 2004). In PLCβ2-GFP mice, taste Receptor (Type II) cells express fluorescent green protein, thereby allowing us to identify this cell type with confidence during imaging experiments. Conversely, in GAD-GFP mice, the majority of Presynaptic (Type III) taste cells show green fluorescence (Tomchik et al., 2007). Mice were killed following National Institutes of Health guidelines, as approved by the University of Miami Animal Care and Use Committee.
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing 5-HT2c receptors or P2X2/P2X3 receptors (hereafter, “biosensor cells”) were prepared and loaded with 5 μM Fura-2 AM as described in Huang et al. (2007). An aliquot of Fura-2-loaded, suspended biosensor cells was transferred to a recording chamber containing taste buds and/or taste cells and viewed with an Olympus IX 70 inverted microscope (Tokyo, Japan) to test biosensor cell responses to bath-applied 5-HT (3 nM) or ATP (1 μM). Responsive biosensor cells were drawn onto a fire-polished glass micropipette with gentle suction and used as a probe for testing transmitter release from taste cells and taste buds. In separate experiments we verified that biosensor cells were not affected by bath-applied KCl, taste mix (cycloheximide, 10 μM; saccharin, 2 mM; SC45647, 0.1 mM; denatonium, 1 mM), (see Huang et al. 2005, 2007), or to the pharmacological compounds used in the present study, including BP554, 8-OH-DPAT, MRS2179, methysergide, paroxetine, and WAY100635 (Supplemental material figure S1). BP554, MRS2179, methysergide as well as paroxetine were obtained from Tocris (Ellisville, MO). 8-OH-DPAT and WAY100635 were from Sigma.
We removed the lingual epithelium containing vallate taste buds from the posterior tongue by injecting 1 mg/ml collagenase A (Roche), 2.5 mg/ml dispase II (Roche), and 1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) directly under the epithelium surrounding the vallate papillae. The peeled epithelium was bathed in Ca2+-free solution 30 minutes at room temperature and isolated taste cells were drawn into fire-polished glass micropipettes with gentle suction. Taste cells were transferred to a shallow recording chamber having a glass coverslip base and then loaded with 5 μM Fura-2 AM. The coverslip was coated with Cell-Tak (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) to hold taste cells firmly attached. Taste buds and/or taste cells were superfused with Tyrode's solution (in mM; 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, 10 Na-pyruvate, 5 NaHCO3, pH7.4, 310-320 Osm). For nominally Ca2+-free Tyrode's solution, MgCl2 was substituted for CaCl2 (in mM; 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 3 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, 10 Na-pyruvate, 5 NaHCO3, 2 BAPTA, 2 EGTA, pH7.4, 310-320 Osm).
For Fura 2-loaded biosensor cells and isolated taste cells and taste buds, sequential images were recorded at 40× with a long pass emission filter (≥ 510 nm) when excited at 340 nm followed by 380 nm (e.g. Huang et al., 2007). Images were processed with Indec Workbench v5 software. Data shown are the ratios, F340/F380, indicating relative changes in [Ca2+]i.
Isolated taste buds and/or cells were stimulated by bath-perfusion of KCl (50 mM, substituted equimolar for NaCl), taste mix (cycloheximide, 10 μM; saccharin, 2 mM; SC45647, 0.1 mM; denatonium, 1 mM), ATP, ADP, or UTP. All stimuli were made up in Tyrode's solution and applied at pH 7.2 unless otherwise noted. Stimuli were applied for 30 seconds after which the perfusion was returned to Tyrode's solution. We perfused the recording chamber with Tyrode's (i.e., wash) for a minimum of 3 to 5 minutes after a response had returned to baseline before testing another stimulus. We found this protocol produced the most repeatable and reliable responses for isolated cells and taste buds. All experiments were conducted at room temperature.
Ca2+ responses evoked by stimuli were measured as the difference between the peak value (F340/F380) and the baseline. We recorded the resting baseline for 30 seconds prior to each stimulus. Our criteria for accepting Ca2+ responses for analysis were (1) responses could be elicited repetitively in the same cell by the same stimulus and (2) the peak response was at least twice the amplitude of baseline fluctuation. It should be noted that biosensor cell responses provide only a rough estimate of transmitter secretion from isolated taste cells and taste buds because the proximity of the biosensor to the release sites varies from cell to cell. Further, slight movement of the biosensor cell during drug application could introduce variation, though this variability would not be systematic. To mitigate against systematic changes upon drug application, responses were recorded before, during, and after applying drugs. Drug effects were reversible for all agents used in this study. Statistical analyses using paired Student's t-tests were applied to determine whether changes in responses following a given treatment were significant. The Fisher's Exact Test was used to compare the incidence of responses between taste cells from knockout mice and those from wild type mice. Data presented in bar graphs show means ± s.e.m.
Important cell-to-cell interactions take place in taste buds immediately upon gustatory stimulation. Specifically, when excited by certain tastants (sweet, bitter, or umami compounds), Receptor (Type II) cells secrete ATP. ATP stimulates adjacent Presynaptic (Type III) cells to release serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) (Huang et al., 2005, 2008). NE does not appear to act on adjacent taste bud cells, or at least on Receptor cells (Huang et al., 2008), However, we and others have suggested that 5-HT mediates paracrine interactions between taste cells (Ewald and Roper, 1994; Kaya et al., 2004). Thus, we tested whether 5-HT might specifically exert feedback onto Receptor cells as outlined in Fig. 1.
To test this hypothesis, we first isolated taste receptor cells (N=22) and taste buds (N=12) and measured taste-evoked ATP secretion in the absence and presence of bath-applied 5-HT, 8-OH-DPAT and BP554. Applying 5-HT did not directly evoke Ca2+ responses in either Receptor or Presynaptic cells (Supplemental material figure S2). However, in the presence of serotonin (10 nM), taste-evoked Ca2+ mobilization in Receptor cells was markedly inhibited and ATP secretion was abolished (Fig. 2A). We applied 5-HT at 10 nM because taste-evoked release of serotonin appears to generate a local concentration on this order of magnitude (e.g., compare 5-HT biosensor calibration responses with taste-evoked responses in isolated taste buds in Fig. 2 of Huang et al., 2005).
Kaya et al. (2004) reported that taste cells express 5-HT1A receptors. Thus, we tested the effects of selective 5-HT1A receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT and BP554, on isolated Receptor cells. A low concentration (10 nM) of 8-OH-DPAT inhibited taste-evoked Ca2+ mobilization in Receptor cells and reduced their ATP secretion in all 4 cells tested, as did BP554 (10 nM) in 10 of 11 cells tested (Fig. 2B).
Gustatory stimuli evoke 5-HT release from Presynaptic cells downstream of Receptor cell excitation, as outlined in Fig 1. Thus, we attempted to manipulate endogenous 5-HT levels by blocking reuptake of this monoamine during taste stimulation. Paroxetine, a serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, would be expected to elevate intercellular 5-HT released during taste stimulation. Indeed, taste-evoked ATP secretion from isolated taste buds was significantly decreased in the presence of paroxetine (100 nM) (Figs. 3C, 3D), consistent with the inhibitory actions of 5-HT documented above and in Figure 3A,B. (Importantly, as noted in Methods, neither paroxetine nor any other pharmacological agent used in this report affected the sensitivity of our biosensor cells, themselves; Supplemental material figure S1).
The converse of this experiment, namely blocking the action of endogenous 5-HT in isolated taste buds, was also investigated. We bath-applied methysergide (10 nM), a broadly acting 5-HT1 and 2 receptor antagonist (Figs. 3E, 3F), or WAY100635 (10 nM), a selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (Figs. 3G, 3H) and tested the ability of taste stimulation to excite Receptor cells and to evoke ATP secretion. With either of these antagonists, taste-evoked ATP release was elevated nearly 2 fold (Figs. 3E~3H). We also bath-applied m-CPBG (m-Chlorophenylbiguanide hydrochloride (50 nM, Tocris, Ellisville, MO), a potent and selective 5-HT3 receptor agonist (Kilpatrick et al. 1990; Morán et al. 2008) to test its effects on ATP secretion. Taste-evoked ATP secretion was not affected by m-CPBG (data not shown).
Lastly, we tested whether 5-HT (10 nM) affected Presynaptic taste cells. Bath-applied 5-HT did not alter depolarization (KCl)-evoked Ca2+ transients in Presynaptic cells (Supplemental material figure S2), suggesting that the inhibitory actions of this biogenic amine, at least at physiologically relevant concentrations, are limited to Receptor cells.
Collectively, the above experiments indicate that during taste stimulation, 5-HT exerts negative feedback onto Receptor (Type II) cells. Moreover, this inhibitory feedback is mediated by 5HT1A receptors.
We isolated individual Receptor or Presynaptic taste cells and bath-applied ATP (1 to 10 μM). As shown previously, Presynaptic cells showed robust Ca2+ signals in response to ATP stimulation (Huang et al., 2007), confirming the feed-forward purinergic signal. Interestingly, Receptor cells were also excited by ATP, suggesting the possibility of positive feedback (see below).
To distinguish ionotropic P2X receptors from metabotropic P2Y purinoceptors on Receptor and Presynaptic cells, we substituted Ca2+ with Mg2+ in the bath. Removing extracellular Ca2+ did not diminish ATP-evoked Ca2+ signals in either Receptor or Presynaptic cells (Fig. 4). This indicates that Presynaptic and Receptor cells both express P2Y receptors. These experiments do not rule out a contribution from P2X receptors, but if ATP also stimulates Ca2+ influx via P2X receptors, the influx would comprise a small component of the Ca2+ signal.
We next attempted to identify the specific subtypes of P2Y purinoceptors on Receptor and Presynaptic cells. Calcium imaging of taste cells is not an ideal preparation for collecting detailed profiling of receptor pharmacology. Nonetheless, we were able to obtain a rough characterization of the purinoceptors involved. As an initial screen, we tested the relative potencies of ATP, ADP, and UTP on Receptor and Presynaptic cells. ATP and ADP, but not UTP (all at 1 μM) evoked robust responses in Receptor cells (Fig. 4). These results are consistent with the expression of P2Y1 receptors on Receptor cells. Accordingly, MRS2179 (10 μM), a selective antagonist of P2Y1 receptors (Mutafova-Yambolieva et al., 2007), abolished ATP-evoked Ca2+ signals in Receptor cells. In contrast, Presynaptic cells responded to 1 μM ATP, ADP, and UTP, a finding inconsistent with P2Y1 receptors. Furthermore, ATP responses in Presynaptic cells were not affected by the P2Y1 antagonist, MRS2179 (Fig. 4).
To test these receptor characterizations further, we isolated individual Receptor cells from mutant mice lacking P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors (Fig. 5). Specifically, we isolated 14 Receptor cells from P2Y1/P2Y2 double knockout mice. None of these Receptor cells responded to 1 μM ADP and 12 of 14 failed to respond to 1 μM ATP. In contrast, all Receptor cells of wild type mice showed robust Ca2+ responses to ATP (21 of 21) and ADP (14 of 14). These differences between the double knockout mice and wild type mice were statistically significant (p<0.001; paired Fisher's exact test). In contrast, ATP- and ADP-evoked responses in Presynaptic cells did not show any difference between wild type (N=30) and mutant mice (N=10) (Fig. 5).
In summary, the above findings suggest that Receptor cells express P2Y1 receptors and Presynaptic cells predominantly express P2Y receptors other than P2Y1.
To extend the investigation of P2Y receptors expressed on Presynaptic cells, we recorded 5-HT secretion from taste buds in response to purinergic stimulation. Serotonin secretion elicited by ATP stimulation is independent of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 6A). This is consistent with our findings above that Presynaptic cells express P2Y (i.e., metabotropic) receptors. ATP-evoked 5-HT secretion in taste buds was not affected by PPADS (Fig. 6B), an antagonist of P2X, P2Y1, and P2Y2 receptors, or by MRS2179 (Fig. 6C). We also tested the ability of ATP, UTP, or ADP to elicit 5-HT secretion from taste buds. A low concentration (1 μM) of ATP and UTP, but not of ADP evoked 5-HT secretion from taste buds (Fig. 6D). These findings implicated that Presynaptic cells express P2Y4 receptors.
To validate the identification of P2Y4 receptors on Presynaptic cells, we isolated taste buds from P2Y4 knockout mice and tested for the presence of taste-evoked 5-HT secretion. We rarely detected 5-HT secretion when taste buds were stimulated by taste compounds, ATP, UTP, or ADP (Fig. 6E). From a total of 41 isolated taste buds, we were able to identify taste-evoked 5-HT release (i.e., 5-HT biosensor responses) in only one case. This is significantly different from the incidence of taste-evoked 5-HT in taste buds isolated from wild type mice (80 out of 384 taste buds; p<0.01). We conclude that Presynaptic cells express P2Y4 receptors.
Because Receptor cells secrete ATP upon taste stimulation and because these cells also express P2Y1 receptors, we tested whether there was purinergic autocrine positive feedback during taste activation. Specifically, we measured taste-evoked ATP secretion from isolated taste buds (wild type mice) in the presence of a P2Y1 antagonist. ATP secretion was significantly decreased (N=4; p<0.01) when MRS2179 (10 μM) was added to the bath (Fig. 7A), showing that ATP likely has an autocrine feedback on Receptor cells. (As an important note, we confirmed that this concentration of MRS2179 did not affect ATP biosensor cells, consistent with ATP biosensor cells stably expressing P2X1/P2X2 receptors).
We extended the analysis of purinergic feedback in taste buds. We investigated whether autocrine feedback influenced the ability of Receptor cells to stimulate 5-HT release from Presynaptic cells. Taste-evoked 5-HT release from isolated taste buds was significantly decreased in the presence of the P2Y1 blocker MRS2179 (N=6; p<0.01) (Fig. 7B), consistent with the above finding that MRS2179 also reduced ATP secretion. As controls for non-specific depression of taste bud function, we tested the ability of KCl depolarization to evoke 5-HT release under the same conditions. Depolarization-evoked 5-HT secretion from isolated taste buds was not affected by MRS2179. MRS2179 also had no direct effect on taste-evoked responses in Receptor cells. (Supplemental material figure S3).
The present report indicates that ATP and 5-HT provide feedback signals within vallate taste buds during taste transmission and identifies the taste cells that express specific receptor subtypes for these transmitters. ATP and its degradation product ADP provide positive autocrine feedback onto taste Receptor (Type II) cells via P2Y1 receptors. In contrast, 5-HT from Presynaptic (Type III) cells exerts negative feedback onto Receptor cells via 5-HT1A receptors. This scenario is summarized in Figure 8. Whether these mechanisms apply to taste buds in other taste fields (fungiform, palate, foliate) remain to be tested.
Several classes of purinoceptors have been identified in taste buds, including P2X (ionotropic) and P2Y (metabotropic) purinoceptors. Over a decade ago, ionotropic ATP receptors (specifically P2X2 and P2X3), were identified in rat taste bud using immunostaining (Bo et al., 1999). These receptors were localized to the nerve fibers innervating taste buds, however, and the findings were interpreted as indicating ATP might be a neurotransmitter between taste buds and sensory afferent fibers. This immunolocalization was later replicated in mice and rats and additional findings further supported that interpretation (Cheung and Burnstock, 2002; Finger et al., 2005; Kataoka et al., 2006). However, a recent publication reported RT-PCR evidence for P2X2, P2X4, P2X7 receptors in mouse taste bud cells and showed immunostaining for one of these, P2X2, in some but not all Presynaptic (Type III) cells (Hayato et al., 2007). Moreover, these same investigators reported functional evidence of P2X receptors in taste cells using Ca2+ imaging on pieces of lingual epithelium containing taste buds and exposed to bath application of 1 μM ATP. Namely, bathing the tissue in Ca2+-free solution reduced the tonic portion of Ca2+ responses evoked by prolonged applications of ATP. Whereas other researchers interpreted a similar finding as evidence for store-operated Ca2+ influx consequent to intracellular Ca2+ release (Baryshnikov et al., 2003), Hayato et al (2007) claimed their finding was functional evidence for P2X receptors. Neither Baryshnikov et al. (2003) nor Hayato et al. (2007) identified ATP-responding taste cells as Receptor or Presynaptic cells. Hayato et al. (2007) further suggested that higher concentrations of ATP activated P2X7 receptors in taste buds. In our experiments we did not see evidence for ionotropic receptors (P2X) contributing to ATP-evoked Ca signals in taste cells. This differs from Hayato et al. (2007). However, we used brief ATP applications (30 sec) which minimized any prolonged tonic response, whether store-activated or P2X receptor-activated. In brief, there is discrepancy in the literature regarding the presence of ionotropic (P2X) receptors on taste bud cells. Our findings do not help resolve this controversy concerning P2X receptors.
There is less controversy regarding the presence of P2Y purioceptors on taste bud cells. Kolesnikov and his associates reported functional activation of P2Y receptors in a subpopulation of mouse taste buds by applying ATP, UTP, and ADP (Kim et al., 2000; Baryshnikov et al., 2003). Baryshnikov et al. (2003) and later Bystrova et al. (2006) interpreted their findings as due to activating P2Y2, P2Y4, or both classes of receptors. These workers did not identify whether the responding cells were Receptor or Presynaptic taste cells, although from their records it is likely that both types were included. P2Y1 receptors in rat taste buds have been demonstrated by RT-PCR (Kataoka et al., 2004). Using Ca2+ imaging and RT-PCR, Bystrova et al. (2006) demonstrated that mouse circumvallate taste cells might express P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4 and P2Y6 receptors. According to our observations, Presynaptic cells showed robust Ca2+ signals in response to ATP and UTP. This suggests Presynaptic cells express P2Y2 and/or P2Y4 receptors. This conclusion is reinforced by the reduction (but not complete absence) of the incidence of ATP-evoked 5-HT release from taste buds of P2Y4 knockout mice. Our findings extend those presented by Bystrova et al (2006), specifically by identifying cell types expressing P2Y receptors. In contrast with Bystrova et al (2006), however, we show that P2Y1 receptors on Receptor cells may play an important role in mouse vallate taste buds.
It is noteworthy that because Receptor cells express the P2Y1 subclass of purinoceptors, this makes them particularly sensitive to ADP. This sensitivity is consistent with the presence of a potent ecto-ATPase, NTPDase2, in taste buds (Bartel et al., 2006), that rapidly degrades ATP to ADP (Matsuoka et al., 2004). Thus, activity of ecto-ATPase during taste signaling generates the autocrine ligand, ADP.
Our findings indicate a prominent inhibitory role for 5-HT in taste buds during taste reception and taste coding. Serotonin exerts negative feedback onto vallate taste Receptor cells at concentrations as low as 10 nM. This negative feedback is manifested as an inhibition of ATP secretion from Receptor cells and presumably therefore as an inhibition of signal output from the taste bud. Paroxetine, a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, strengthened this inhibitory feedback in our experiments.
Although the inhibitory role of 5-HT remains to be tested carefully in behavioural assays of peripheral taste in experimental animals, observations on how manipulations aimed at altering peripheral 5-HT levels in humans affect taste thresholds are consistent with our findings. Namely, O'Driscoll et al. (2008) measured taste thresholds in healthy subjects before and after administering Seroxat™ or paroxetine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors. They found that topical application of Seroxat™ and systemic paroxetine acutely reduced quinine (bitter) taste sensitivity in their subjects. This would be entirely consistent with our report here of an inhibitory role for 5-HT in taste bud function. Interestingly, the same group found that in contrast with these acute effects, chronic depression of 5-HT reuptake in healthy subjects increased taste sensitivity to sweet and bitter (Heath et al., 2006). There are other parallels in the literature regarding the effects of administering 5-HT, for example in amphibian taste buds. Ewald and Roper (1994) recorded from adjacent cells from taste buds in Necturus maculosus. Those researchers found that over the short term, repetitive stimulation of one taste cell hyperpolarized the adjacent cell, suggesting an inhibitory effect. This hyperpolarization was mimicked by bath-applied 5-HT. In other studies, Morimoto and Sato (1977) reported that in an intact frog tongue preparation, 5-HT acutely depressed taste sensitivity. Using a similar preparation, Esakov et al. (1983) found that at longer times after 5-HT (up to an hour) taste responses were enhanced. Esakov et al. (1983) interpreted these findings as indicating that serotonin had been taken up and subsequently released as an excitatory taste neurotransmitter, perhaps mirroring the chronic effects in humans reported by Heath et al. (2006). Collectively, all the above reports on short term effects of serotonin are resolved and clarified by the present findings that 5-HT exerts a rapid and potent paracrine inhibition of taste receptor activity.
In rat taste buds, Kaya et al (2004) surmised that serotonin was a paracrine transmitter acting at 5-HT1A receptors, although the identity of the cells expressing that receptor was not established. Those authors speculated that serotonin inhibited neighboring taste cells. Vandenbeuch et al (2008b) also reported that BP554, a 5-HT1A agonist, evoked responses in taste bud cells when applied at 10 μM. In our study, we did not observe Ca2+ transients in response to 5-HT or its receptor agonists, but our experiments were conducted with much lower agonist concentrations (10 nM), which proved to be effective inhibitors. Thus, our data confirm and extend these previous findings of 5-HT1A receptor mechanisms and show where and how 5-HT acts as a paracrine inhibitory feedback signal.
Serotonin may also be a neurocrine transmitter, as speculated by Esakov et al. (1983). Presumably this would be at synapses that Presynaptic cells make onto nerve fibers. Noradrenalin and serotonin are co-released from Presynaptic cells (Huang et al., 2008) and perhaps together these amines act at those synapses. There has been no resolution to this notion, however. Finger et al. (2005) reported anecdotally that mice lacking one type of serotonin receptor, 5-HT3, showed no obvious taste behaviour abnormalities. Detailed studies on these mice and on mutant strains lacking other types of 5-HT receptors are lacking. In short, to date there is no complete description for how or whether serotonin functions in taste buds as a neurocrine transmitter onto gustatory afferent axons.
Dr. Yutaka Maruyama kindly generated the ATP-biosensor cells used in this study using constructs provided by Dr. A Surprenant. 5-HT biosensor cells were a generous gift from Dr. K. Berg. Drs. N. Chaudhari and S. C. Kinnamon contributed valuable discussions to the work. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health–National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant 5R01DC007630 (S.D.R.).