PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
N Engl J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 February 12.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2821221
NIHMSID: NIHMS170140

Aggressive vs. Conservative Phototherapy for Infants with Extremely Low Birth Weight

Brenda H. Morris, M.D., William Oh, M.D., Jon E. Tyson, M.D., M.P.H., David K. Stevenson, M.D., Dale L. Phelps, M.D., T. Michael O'Shea, M.D., M.P.H., Georgia E. McDavid, R.N., Rebecca L. Perritt, M.S., Krisa P. Van Meurs, M.D., Betty R. Vohr, M.D., Cathy Grisby, B.S.N., Qing Yao, Ph.D., Claudia Pedroza, Ph.D., Abhik Das, Ph.D., W. Kenneth Poole, Ph.D., Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D., Shahnaz Duara, M.D., Abbot R. Laptook, M.D., Walid A. Salhab, M.D., Seetha Shankaran, M.D., Brenda B. Poindexter, M.D., Avroy A. Fanaroff, M.D., Michele C. Walsh, M.D., Maynard R. Rasmussen, M.D., Barbara J. Stoll, M.D., C. Michael Cotten, M.D., Edward F. Donovan, M.D., Richard A. Ehrenkranz, M.D., Ronnie Guillet, M.D., Ph.D., and Rosemary D. Higgins, M.D.*, for the NICHD Neonatal Research Network

Abstract

Background

It is unclear whether aggressive phototherapy to prevent neurotoxic effects of bilirubin benefits or harms infants with extremely low birth weight (1000 g or less).

Methods

We randomly assigned 1974 infants with extremely low birth weight at 12 to 36 hours of age to undergo either aggressive or conservative phototherapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death or neurodevelopmental impairment determined for 91% of the infants by investigators who were unaware of the treatment assignments.

Results

Aggressive phototherapy, as compared with conservative phototherapy, significantly reduced the mean peak serum bilirubin level (7.0 vs. 9.8 mg per deciliter [120 vs. 168 μmol per liter], P<0.01) but not the rate of the primary outcome (52% vs. 55%; relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.02; P = 0.15). Aggressive phototherapy did reduce rates of neurodevelopmental impairment (26%, vs. 30% for conservative phototherapy; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.99). Rates of death in the aggressive-phototherapy and conservative-phototherapy groups were 24% and 23%, respectively (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.22). In preplanned subgroup analyses, the rates of death were 13% with aggressive phototherapy and 14% with conservative phototherapy for infants with a birth weight of 751 to 1000 g and 39% and 34%, respectively (relative risk, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.34), for infants with a birth weight of 501 to 750 g.

Conclusions

Aggressive phototherapy did not significantly reduce the rate of death or neurodevelopmental impairment. The rate of neurodevelopmental impairment alone was significantly reduced with aggressive phototherapy. This reduction may be offset by an increase in mortality among infants weighing 501 to 750 g at birth. (ClinicalTrials. gov number, NCT00114543.)

It is controversial whether modest elevations of total serum bilirubin (hereafter referred to simply as “bilirubin”) cause brain damage in preterm infants.1-4 Some observational studies of preterm infants have suggested that bilirubin levels as low as 5 mg per deciliter (86 μmol per liter) or even lower may cause neurodevelopmental deficits.5-8 However, other observational studies have suggested that moderately higher bilirubin levels have no neurotoxic effects9-11 or might even benefit these infants,12 because bilirubin is an antioxidant.

Phototherapy is considered to be effective and safe in reducing bilirubin levels.13 However, it has been studied in only one large, randomized trial involving infants treated in the 1970s.14 No neurodevelopmental benefits were identified,15 and the findings suggested the possibility that phototherapy might increase the risk of death relative to that among controls in the same birth-weight stratum: for birth weight below 2500 g, the relative risk was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.82); for birth weight below 1000 g, the relative risk was 1.49 (95% CI, 0.93 to 2.40).16,17 Since that trial was reported, the levels of irradiance delivered by phototherapy lamps have substantially increased, with uncertain effects on the risks and benefits of phototherapy.

We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing the effect of aggressive phototherapy as compared with conservative phototherapy on the incidence of death or neurodevelopmental impairment among infants of extremely low birth weight at 18 to 22 months after the expected date of delivery (the corrected age).

Methods

The institutional review boards at RTI International and all 16 Neonatal Research Network clinical centers (see the Appendix) approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of each participant.

Patients

Infants with a birth weight of 501 to 1000 g were eligible for enrollment between 12 and 36 hours of age. Exclusion criteria were a terminal condition (defined as a pH <6.8 or persistent bradycardia with hypoxemia for >2 hours), previous phototherapy, a major congenital anomaly, hydrops fetalis or severe hemolytic disease, congenital nonbacterial infection, or a judgment that the parents would be unable or unlikely to return for assessments at 18 to 22 months.

Enrollment and Treatment

Infants were stratified on the basis of birth weight (501 to 750 g or 751 to 1000 g) and center and were then randomly assigned to a treatment group by means of a centralized computer system. The protocol stipulated the use of phototherapy during the first 14 days after birth. In both groups, phototherapy was provided for at least 24 consecutive hours after it was started or restarted.

For infants in the aggressive-phototherapy group, phototherapy was initiated at enrollment (when the bilirubin level was expected to be approximately 5 mg per deciliter). For infants with a birth weight of 501 to 750 g, the aggressive phototherapy was continued or restarted whenever the bilirubin level was found to be 5 mg per deciliter or higher. For infants with a birth weight of 751 to 1000 g, the aggressive phototherapy was continued or restarted whenever the bilirubin level was found to be 5 mg per deciliter or higher during the first 7 days after birth and 7 mg per deciliter (120 μmol per liter) or higher during the next 7 days. Conservative phototherapy was initiated, continued, or restarted whenever the bilirubin level was 8 mg per deciliter (137 μmol per liter) or higher for infants weighing 501 to 750 g at birth and 10 mg per deciliter (171 μmol per liter) or higher for infants weighing 751 to 1000 g at birth.

A baseline bilirubin level was measured within 4 hours before or at enrollment for the first 100 infants enrolled in each treatment group. Bilirubin was measured at least once daily for the first 7 days after birth for all infants. During the second week after birth, bilirubin was measured on any day on which phototherapy was administered or when phototherapy had been stopped in the previous 24 hours or the last bilirubin measurement exceeded 5 mg per deciliter for infants with a birth weight of 501 to 750 g or 7 mg per deciliter for infants with a birth weight 751 to 1000 g. A parent or guardian of 1101 infants consented to the collection of an additional blood sample on day 5 of the treatment period, which was sent to Stanford University or Brown University for assay of the serum level of unbound bilirubin according to the Arrow technique.18 Unbound bilirubin (which accumulates when the bilirubin-binding capacity of albumin has been exceeded) was assessed because the neurotoxic effects of bilirubin are thought to be caused by entry of unbound bilirubin into the brain.18

On the basis of current phototherapy recommendations and practice,13 the target irradiance level was 15 to 40 μW per square centimeter per nanometer of wavelength and was measured by research personnel and bedside nurses. Irradiance levels were increased, within this range, if the bilirubin level exceeded 13 mg per deciliter (222 μmol per liter) for infants with a birth weight of 501 to 750 g and 15 mg per deciliter (256 μmol per liter) for infants with a birth weight of 751 to 1000 g. An exchange transfusion was indicated for any infant whose bilirubin level exceeded the threshold after 8 hours of this intensified treatment. The study was designed as an effectiveness trial,19 and the brand and number of phototherapy lights, administration of fluids, feedings, and other interventions were chosen at the discretion of the caregivers.

Assessments

Research nurses recorded all data using standardized definitions. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was identified by the administration of supplemental oxygen therapy at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Outcomes at 18 to 22 months of corrected age were assessed by neurologic examiners and neurodevelopmental testers who had been trained for reliability of assessments during a 2-day workshop and were unaware of the treatment assignments.20

The primary outcome was death or neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months of corrected age. This composite outcome was selected because infants who died before 18 months of corrected age could not be classified as having neurodevelopmental impairment. Neurodevelopmental impairment was defined as blindness (no functional vision in either eye), severe hearing loss (hearing loss for which bilateral hearing aids were prescribed), moderate or severe cerebral palsy, or a score below 70 on the Mental or Psychomotor Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (on which scores can range from 50 to 150, with 150 indicating the most advanced development).21 Secondary outcomes included each of the individual outcomes above and predefined clinical diagnoses or potential adverse events. Cerebral palsy was defined as a nonprogressive disorder of the central nervous system characterized by abnormal muscle tone in at least one arm or leg and abnormal control of movement or posture with delayed attainment of motor milestones. Infants were classified as having moderate or severe cerebral palsy if they were able to walk only with assistive devices or were unable to walk at all, respectively. Hearing outcomes were determined by the neurologic examiner and reports by parents or guardians. If a hearing loss was present, more information was collected to determine the nature of the deficit and whether hearing aids were prescribed. In post hoc analyses, we used a definition of profound impairment that was similar to the definition in a previous analysis by our group22: a score on the Mental or Psychomotor Developmental Index of 50 or less or a level of 5 for gross motor function, according to the modified criteria of Palisano et al.23 (on which the level of motor function can range from 0 to 5, with 5 indicating that movement requires assistance by an adult).

Statistical Analysis

A difference of 7 percentage points between the two treatment groups in the rate of the primary outcome was considered clinically important. To detect this difference with an alpha value of 0.05 and a statistical power of 0.80, we planned to study 1976 infants. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. The denominator used to calculate the rate of each outcome was the number of infants for whom that outcome was known. Analyses were conducted at the Neonatal Research Network data coordinating center, at RTI International, and were adjusted for the stratification variables (birth weight and center) with the use of robust Poisson regression analyses to estimate the adjusted relative risk. Additional regression analyses involved adjustment for the infants' sex, race or ethnic group, and location of birth (within or outside of the network center). To assess whether differences between groups might be explained by differences in rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia between the two groups, separate regression analyses were performed in which bronchopulmonary dysplasia was added as a predictor variable.

Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted for each birth-weight stratum. We included an interaction term for birth-weight stratum with treatment group and assessed the statistical significance of the interaction term. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Analyses did not include adjustment for multiple comparisons.24

Our findings prompted us to perform post hoc analyses of profound impairment, as well as Bayesian analyses25-29 of overall outcomes and outcomes according to birth-weight stratum30 (for details, see the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at www.nejm.org). No other post hoc analyses were performed.

RTI International tracked hearing assessments and deaths before discharge, since data for the primary outcome would not be available before 18 to 22 months. An independent data and safety monitoring committee reviewed the interim results, including those concerning adverse outcomes, four times. Pocock boundaries were used to develop stopping rules for interim safety monitoring of death and for hearing loss. The nominal significance level was 0.05 and the critical P value for each review was set at 0.0158.

Results

Between September 2002 and April 2005, we enrolled 1974 (69%) of 2873 eligible infants (Fig. 1). The aggressive-phototherapy group and the conservative-phototherapy group were generally similar, with small differences in the percentages of male infants and black infants (Table 1).

Figure 1
Enrollment, Randomization, and Follow-up of the Study Patients
Table 1
Baseline Characteristics of the Patients.*

As expected, the two groups differed significantly in mean and peak bilirubin levels, unbound bilirubin on day 5, and the duration of phototherapy (Table 2). The proportion of infants receiving phototherapy and the mean bilirubin levels are shown according to day after birth and treatment group in Fig. 1A and 1B in the Supplementary Appendix. Phototherapy was never given to 1 of the 990 infants (<1%) in the aggressive-phototherapy group and to 215 of the 984 infants (22%) in the conservative-phototherapy group. Among infants who did receive phototherapy, the mean irradiance levels were 22 to 23 μW per square centimeter per nanometer each day.

Table 2
Findings in Study Patients before or at Discharge.*

The bilirubin level in 3 infants in the aggressive-phototherapy group and 13 in the conservative-phototherapy group exceeded the threshold, resulting in intensified phototherapy. Two infants receiving aggressive phototherapy and 3 receiving conservative phototherapy received an exchange transfusion; an additional infant in each group who met criteria for exchange transfusion did not undergo the procedure, on the basis of the judgment of the attending neonatologist.

The rates of prespecified secondary outcomes before hospital discharge are shown in Table 2. The relative risks for bronchopulmonary dysplasia and the composite outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death were significantly reduced with aggressive phototherapy as compared with conservative phototherapy, but those for the other 12 predischarge outcomes were not. The relative risks shown in Table 2 changed only minimally in analyses that involved adjustment for race or ethnic group, sex, and location of birth of infants (data not shown).

Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months

The primary outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment was determined for 1804 infants (91% of the 1974 who underwent randomization); whether the infant died was known for 1890 (96%). The proportion of infants with the primary outcome was 52% in the aggressive-phototherapy group and 55% in the conservative-phototherapy group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.02; P = 0.15) (Table 3). (The relative risk in analyses that were also adjusted for race or ethnic group, sex, and location of birth was 0.96 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.04], P = 0.33.)

Table 3
Primary and Other Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months.*

Death occurred in 24% of infants in the aggressive-phototherapy group and 23% of those in the conservative-phototherapy group (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.22). The rate of neurodevelopmental impairment was lower with aggressive phototherapy than with conservative therapy (26% vs. 30%; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.99; with 25 patients needing to be treated on average to prevent one case of impairment). In post hoc analyses, we found that this difference was almost entirely due to a reduction in profound impairment in the aggressive-phototherapy group (9%, vs. 13% in the conservative-phototherapy group; relative risk, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89). As compared with the conservative-phototherapy group, the aggressive-phototherapy group also had significant reductions in the rate of severe hearing loss, in athetosis, and in Mental Developmental Index scores below 70 and below 85. However, aggressive phototherapy did not significantly reduce rates of death or combined outcomes including death or severe hearing loss, death or athetosis, or death or Mental Developmental Index scores below 70. Adjustment for the presence or absence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia had no material effect on the relative risks for the primary or secondary outcomes at 18 to 22 months.

Among the 1114 infants with a birth weight of 751 to 1000 g, aggressive phototherapy as compared with conservative phototherapy was associated with a marginally significant reduction in the rate of the primary outcome (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01) and significant reductions in the rates of severe hearing loss and, in post hoc analyses, profound neurodevelopmental impairment and the composite outcome of death or profound impairment at 18 to 22 months (Table 4). Other secondary outcomes listed were not significantly lower in the aggressive-phototherapy group.

Table 4
Secondary Analyses, According to Birth-Weight Stratum.*

Among the 860 infants with a birth weight of 501 to 750 g, the relative risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment with aggressive phototherapy, as compared with conservative phototherapy, was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.10). In this subgroup, there was an increase of 5 percentage points in the rate of death and a decrease of 5 percentage points in neurodevelopmental impairment overall for aggressive phototherapy as compared with conservative phototherapy; in a post hoc analysis, there was a reduction of 4 percentage points in the rate of profound impairment (relative risk, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.98). The P value for the interaction of treatment group and birth-weight category was 0.15. Results of Bayesian analyses are shown in Figure 4 in the Supplementary Appendix; these analyses estimated an 89% probability that aggressive phototherapy increased the rate of death in this subgroup.

Relationship of Serum Bilirubin and Outcome

The mean (±SD) bilirubin level during the first 14 days among impaired survivors and unimpaired survivors was 5.4±1.6 and 5.4±1.5 mg per deciliter (92±27 and 92±26 μmol per liter), respectively (P = 0.45). Although the mean peak bilirubin level differed significantly between impaired survivors and unimpaired survivors (8.6±2.3 vs. 8.3±2.3 mg per deciliter [147±39 vs. 142±39 μmol per liter], P = 0.02), there was considerable overlap between the two groups in the peak values (Fig. 5 in the Supplementary Appendix). The mean bilirubin level among survivors with hearing loss as compared with those without hearing loss was 6.5±1.7 versus 5.4±1.5 mg per deciliter (111±29 vs. 92±26 μmol per liter) (range, 2.7 to 11.9 vs. 0.6 to 10.1 [46 to 203 vs. 10 to 173]), respectively (P<0.001). The mean peak bilirubin level among survivors with hearing loss as compared with those without hearing loss was 10.5±2.3 vs. 8.4±2.3 mg per deciliter (180±39 vs. 144±39 μmol per liter) (range, 5.8 to 17.8 vs. 1.3 to 17.7 [99 to 304 vs. 22 to 303), respectively (P<0.001).

Discussion

Decisions to use aggressive or conservative phototherapy in infants with extremely low birth weights have been based on inferences from observational studies relating bilirubin level to outcome.5-8,31 In this multicenter trial, we found no significant difference in the rate of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (the primary outcome) at 18 to 22 months of corrected age between neonates randomly assigned to receive aggressive phototherapy as compared with those assigned to receive conservative phototherapy. However, aggressive phototherapy significantly reduced the rate of neurodevelopmental impairment. In post hoc analyses, this reduction was attributable almost entirely to there being fewer infants with profound impairment in the aggressive-phototherapy group.

In prespecified subgroup analyses, the rate of death among infants weighing 501 to 750 g at birth was higher, albeit not significantly so, with aggressive phototherapy than with conservative phototherapy. In this subgroup, the absolute increase in the number of deaths associated with aggressive phototherapy was 5 percentage points, a rate equal to the reduction of 5 percentage points in overall neurodevelopmental impairment and a reduction of slightly more than the 4 percentage points in profound impairment. The P value for the interaction between treatment group and birth weight (P=0.15) was not significant, but the power of the study was limited, and the possibility of an increase in the rate of death in the group with lower birth weights, as supported by the Bayesian analysis,28,29,32,33 should be taken seriously.34

These findings are particularly worrisome because of the trend toward an increased rate of death in the only previous major trial assessing phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.14 In that trial, infants with a birth weight of less than 2500 g were randomly assigned to undergo either 96 hours of phototherapy or no phototherapy. The relative risk for death with phototherapy was 1.49 (95% CI, 0.93 to 2.40) among the 77 infants of extremely low birth weight and 1.32 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.82) among the 1063 infants of low birth weight.17 Although subgroup analyses must be viewed with skepticism, they are most likely to be valid when, as in our study, they are supported by preexisting evidence, are preplanned, and are biologically plausible.35,36

A reduction in the rate of death with conservative phototherapy might result from increased antioxidant levels12 associated with higher bilirubin levels. Alternatively, a higher rate of death with aggressive phototherapy might result from oxidative injury to cell membranes.37-39 Such injury is particularly probable in the smallest, most immature infants whose gelatinous, thin skin readily transmits light.40

The mechanism by which aggressive phototherapy would reduce the neurotoxic effects of bilirubin probably involves a reduction in the level of unbound bilirubin. The overlap in bilirubin values between infants with impairment and those without impairment and between those with severe hearing loss and those without it provide little evidence to support a specific bilirubin threshold causing impairment. Longer follow-up is needed to assess effects of treatment on outcomes such as intelligence and executive function.

The reduced incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the aggressive-phototherapy group was not hypothesized, could have been a result of chance, and did not appear to explain the differences in outcome at 18 to 22 months. The number of days needed to regain birth weight was almost identical in the two groups, suggesting that differences in fluid management are unlikely to have caused a difference in the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

The substantial reduction in overall neurodevelopmental impairment and profound impairment that we observed occurred with a reduction of only 2.8 mg per deciliter (48 μmol per liter) in mean peak bilirubin level during the first 14 days. Greater reductions in bilirubin might further reduce impairment rates, providing the reductions could be safely achieved. Other treatment strategies, including the use of tin mesoporphyrin,41 also warrant evaluation to identify the safest and most effective strategies to address the postnatal rise in serum bilirubin level in infants of extremely low birth weight.

In summary, we found no significant effect of aggressive phototherapy as compared with conservative phototherapy on the primary outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment in infants of extremely low birth weight, but the use of aggressive phototherapy significantly reduced the overall rate of neurodevelopmental impairment. Aggressive phototherapy may be preferred for infants with birth weights of 751 to 1000 g, because we found significant neurodevelopmental benefits in this subgroup and no evidence that the therapy increased the rate of death or other adverse outcomes at 18 to 22 months (including, in post hoc analyses, the rate of profound impairment). For infants with a birth weight of 501 to 750 g, the possibility that increased mortality may offset any potential benefits of aggressive phototherapy must be considered.

Supplementary Material

arrays

Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, which provided overall oversight for study conduct. All data analyses and interpretation were done independently of the funding agency. Natus Medical loaned light-emitting diode phototherapy lights to each center. These lights were used at the discretion of the attending neonatologist in treating infants in either treatment group. The lights were returned to Natus Medical or purchased at a prorated price after the study. Natus Medical played no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, or manuscript preparation or revision.

We thank our medical and nursing colleagues and the infants and their parents.

Appendix

Members of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network are as follows: Neonatal Research Network ChairUniversity of Cincinnati — A. Jobe; Follow-up InvestigatorsEmory University — I. Adams-Chapman; University of Miami — C. Bauer; Indiana University — A.M. Dusick; Duke University — R. Goldstein; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center — R.J. Heyne; Stanford University School of Medicine — S.R. Hintz; University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry — G. Myers; Wayne State University — A. Pappas; University of Alabama — M. Peralta-Carcelen; University of Cincinnati — J. Steichen; University of California, San Diego — Y.E. Vaucher; Wake Forest University School of Medicine — R. Dillard; Wake Forest University — L.K. Washburn; Case Western Reserve University — D. Wilson-Costello; Neonatal Research Network Investigators (National Institutes of Health or General Clinical Research Center [GCRC] grant number given in parentheses)Brown University, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (U10 HD27904) — W. Oh, A.R. Laptook, B.R. Vohr, A. Hensman, L. Noel; Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital (GCRC M01 RR80, U10 HD21364) — A.A. Fanaroff, M.C. Walsh, D. Wilson-Costello, N.S. Newman, B.S. Siner; Duke University, University Hospital, Alamance Regional Medical Center, and Durham Regional Hospital (GCRC M01 RR30, CCTS UL1 RR24128, U10 HD40492) — R.N. Goldberg, C. M. Cotten, R. Goldstein, K. Auten, M. Lohmeyer; Emory University, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Grady Memorial Hospital, and Emory Crawford Long Hospital (GCRC M01 RR39, U10 HD27851) — B.J. Stoll, I. Adams-Chapman, E. Hale; Indiana University, Indiana University Hospital, Methodist Hospital, Riley Hospital for Children, and Wishard Health Services (GCRC M01 RR750, U10 HD27856) — J.A. Lemons, B.B. Poindexter, A.M. Dusick, D.D. Appel, D. Herron, L. Miller, L. Richard; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development — L.L. Wright, R.D. Higgins; RTI International (U01 HD36790) — W.K. Poole, A. Das, B. Hastings, E. McClure, J. Newman; R.L. Perritt, Q. Yao, C.P. Huitema, K. Zaterka-Baxter; Stanford University, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (GCRC M01 RR70, U10 HD27880) — D.K. Stevenson, K.P. Van Meurs, S.R. Hintz, M.B. Ball; University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System and Children's Hospital of Alabama (GCRC M01 RR32, U10 HD34216) — W.A. Carlo, M. Peralta-Carcelen, M.V. Collins, S.S. Cosby, V. Phillips; University of California, San Diego, Medical Center and Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women (U10 HD40461) — N.N. Finer, Y.E. Vaucher, M.R. Rasmussen, D. Kaegi, K. Arnell, C. Demetrio, M.G. Fuller, C. Henderson, W. Rich; University of Cincinnati, University Hospital, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and Good Samaritan Hospital (GCRC M01 RR8084, U10 HD27853) — E.F. Donovan, K. Schibler, J. Steichen, B. Alexander, C. Grisby, M. Mersmann, H. Mincey, J. Shively, T. Gratton; University of Miami, Holtz Children's Hospital (GCRC M01 RR16587, U10 HD21397) — C.R. Bauer, S. Duara, R. Everett-Thomas; University of Rochester, Golisano Children's Hospital at Strong (GCRC M01 RR44, U10 HD40521) — R. Guillet, D.L. Phelps, G. Myers, L. Reubens, D. Hust, R. Jensen, E. Burnell; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Parkland Health and Hospital System and Children's Medical Center Dallas (GCRC M01 RR633, U10 HD40689) — W.A. Salhab, P. Sanchez, C.R. Rosenfeld, R.J. Heyne, J. Hickman, G. Hensley, N.A. Miller, J. Morgan; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, and Lyndon Baines Johnson General Hospital–Harris County Hospital District (CCTS KL2 RR24149, CCTS UL1 RR24148, U10 HD21373) — J.E. Tyson, K. Kennedy, B.H. Morris, C. Pedroza, P.J. Bradt, P.W. Evans, L.L. Whiteley, E.G. Akpa, P.A. Cluff, A.E. Lis, G.E. McDavid, C.Y. Franco, M. Currence, N.I. Alaniz, P.L. Tate, S.L. Wright; Wake Forest University, Baptist Medical Center, Brenner Children's Hospital, and Forsyth Medical Center (GCRC M01 RR7122, U10 HD40498) — T.M. O'Shea, L.K. Washburn, N.J. Peters, B.G. Jackson; Wayne State University, Hutzel Women's Hospital and Children's Hospital of Michigan (U10 HD21385) — S. Shankaran, Y. Johnson, A. Pappas, R. Bara, G. Muran, D. Kennedy; Yale University, Yale–New Haven Children's Hospital (GCRC M01 RR6022, U10 HD27871) — R.A. Ehrenkranz, P. Gettner, H. Jacobs, C. Butler, P. Cervone, M. Konstantino, E. Romano.

Footnotes

Dr. Fanaroff reports receiving consulting fees, and Dr. Guillet grant support, from Natus. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Bratlid D. How bilirubin gets into the brain. Clin Perinatol. 1990;17:449–65. [PubMed]
2. Cashore WJ. The neurotoxicity of bilirubin. Clin Perinatol. 1990;17:437–47. [PubMed]
3. Lucey JF. Bilirubin and brain damage — a real mess. Pediatrics. 1982;69:381–2.
4. Watchko JF, Oski FA. Kernicterus in preterm newborns: past, present, and future. Pediatrics. 1992;90:707–15. [PubMed]
5. Boggs TR, Jr, Hardy JB, Frazier TM. Correlation of neonatal serum total bilirubin concentrations and developmental status at age eight months: a preliminary report from the Collaborative Project. J Pediatr. 1967;71:553–60. [PubMed]
6. Scheidt PC, Mellits ED, Hardy JB, Drage JS, Boggs TR. Toxicity to bilirubin in neonates: infant development during first year in relation to maximum neonatal serum bilirubin concentration. J Pediatr. 1977;91:292–7. [PubMed]
7. van de Bor M, van Zeben-van der Aa TM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Brand R, Ruys JH. Hyperbilirubinemia in preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age: results of a national collaborative survey. Pediatrics. 1989;83:915–20. [PubMed]
8. Oh W, Tyson JE, Fanaroff AA, et al. Association between peak serum bilirubin and neurodevelopmental outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112:773–9. [PubMed]
9. O'Shea TM, Dillard RG, Klinepeter KL, Goldstien DJ. Serum bilirubin levels, intracranial hemorrhage, and the risk of developmental problems in very low birth weight neonates. Pediatrics. 1992;90:888–92. [PubMed]
10. Graziani LJ, Mitchell DG, Kornhauser M, et al. Neurodevelopment of preterm infants: neonatal neurosonographic and serum bilirubin studies. Pediatrics. 1992;89:229–34. [PubMed]
11. Yeo KL, Perlman M, Hao Y, Mullaney P. Outcomes of extremely premature infants related to their peak serum bilirubin concentrations and exposure to phototherapy. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1426–31. [PubMed]
12. Gopinathan V, Miller NJ, Milner AD, Rice-Evans CA. Bilirubin and ascorbate antioxidant activity in neonatal plasma. FEBS Lett. 1994;349:197–200. [PubMed]
13. Maisels MJ. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. In: Klaus MH, Fanaroff AA, editors. Care of the high-risk neonate. 5th. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2001. pp. 324–62.
14. Brown AK, Kim MH, Wu PYK, Bryla DA. Efficacy of phototherapy in prevention and management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics. 1985;75:393–400. [PubMed]
15. Scheidt PC, Bryla DA, Nelson KB, Hirtz DG, Hoffman HJ. Phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: six-year follow-up of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development clinical trial. Pediatrics. 1990;85:455–63. [PubMed]
16. Lipsitz PJ, Gartner LM, Bryla DA. Neonatal and infant mortality in relation to phototherapy. Pediatrics. 1985;75(Suppl):422–6. [PubMed]
17. Sinclair JC, Bracken MB, editors. Effective care of the newborn infant. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 532.
18. Ahlfors CE. Unbound bilirubin associated with kernicterus: a historical approach. J Pediatr. 2000;137:540–4. [PubMed]
19. Jadad AR, Enkin MW. Randomized controlled trials: questions, answers and musings. 2nd. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. pp. 13–5.
20. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Poole WK, McDonald SA. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants <32 weeks' gestation between 1993 and 1998. Pediatrics. 2005;116:635–43. [PubMed]
21. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of infant development II. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1993.
22. Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD. Intensive care for extreme prematurity — moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1672–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:214–23. [PubMed]
24. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1:43–6. [PubMed]
25. Dixon DO, Simon R. Bayesian subset analysis. Biometrics. 1991;47:871–81. [PubMed]Biometrics. 1994;50:322. Erratum.
26. Simon RM, Dixon DO, Freidlin B. A Bayesian model for evaluating specificity of treatment effects in clinical trials. In: Thall PF, editor. Recent advances in clinical trial design and analysis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic; 1995. pp. 155–75.
27. Simon R. Bayesian subset analysis: application to studying treatment-by-gender interactions. Stat Med. 2002;21:2909–16. [PubMed]
28. Berry DA. Bayesian clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:27–36. [PubMed]
29. Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR. An introduction to Bayesian methods in health technology assessment. BMJ. 1999;319:508–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2007.
31. Hack M, Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Taylor GH, Schluchter M, Fanaroff AA. Neurodevelopment and predictors of outcomes of children with birth weights of less than 1000 g: 1992-1995. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:725–31. [PubMed]
32. Lilford RJ, Thornton JG, Braunholtz D. Clinical trials and rare diseases: a way out of a conundrum. BMJ. 1995;311:1621–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Brophy JM, Joseph L. Placing trials in context using Bayesian analysis: GUSTO revisited by Reverend Bayes. JAMA. 1995;273:871–5. [PubMed]
34. DeMets DL, Pocock SJ, Julian DG. The agonising negative trend in monitoring of clinical trials. Lancet. 1999;354:1983–8. [PubMed]
35. Oxman A, Guyatt G. Summarizing the evidence: when to believe a subgroup analysis. In: Guyatt G, Drummond R, editors. Users' guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago: AMA Press; 2002. pp. 553–65.
36. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine — reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2189–94. [PubMed]
37. Tozzi E, Tozzi-Ciancarelli MG, Di Giulo A, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of erythrocyte phototherapy on newborns. Biol Neonate. 1989;56:204–9. [PubMed]
38. Sisson TR. Photodegradation of riboflavin in neonates. Fed Proc. 1987;46:1883–5. [PubMed]
39. Vreman HJ, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK. Phototherapy: current methods and future directions. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28:326–33. [PubMed]
40. Hintz SR, Cheong WF, van Houten JP, Stevenson DK, Benaron DA. Bedside imaging of intracranial hemorrhage in the neonate using light: comparison with ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:54–9. [PubMed]
41. Wong RJ, Bhutani VK, Vreman HJ, Stevenson DK. Tin mesoporphyrin for the prevention of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. NeoReviews. 2007;8(2):e77–e84.