We report a 7-year-old girl with both DMD and OFCD syndrome. Both diagnoses were confirmed by molecular evidence with a deletion of exons 30 through 43 of the
DMD gene and a frameshift mutation of the
BCOR gene. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case with this combination. Both conditions are X-linked with
DMD mapping to Xp21.2 and
BCOR to Xp11.4. The patient’s muscular dystrophy seems to be at the severe end of the spectrum even when compared to males with DMD. Although she has many of the features commonly seen in other patients with OFCD, the typical facial features were very mild. Her specific dental anomaly of both delayed and abnormal order of tooth eruption has not been reported before. Also, her language development is significantly delayed. Speech articulation problems have been reported in 1–3% of males with DMD [
Cotton et al., 2005;
Hinton et al., 2007]], and recent reports suggest that males with DMD may have delayed language development [
Giliberto et al, 2004;
Cyrulnik et al, 2007].
Hendriksen and Vles [2008] surveyed 351 male patients with DMD and found that 3.1% had autism spectrum disorder, which is significantly higher than would be predicted for random co-occurrence [
Hendriksen and Vles, 2008]. In another survey,
Young and colleagues [2008] reported that 8.3% of males with Becker muscular dystrophy have autism [
Young et al., 2008]; however, no information was provided regarding developmental outcomes in females affected with DMD. Language development is usually normal in girls with OFCD syndrome [
Gorlin, 1998], but others have reported developmental delay in one individual with OFCD [
Hedera and Gorski, 2003]. Our patient is severely affected with DMD, however, and so it seems reasonable to conclude that her language delay would be comparable to that of a male with DMD, or that the combination of DMD and OFCD syndrome may have more severe effects on language and development than either condition alone. An assessment of her neurodevelopmental status in the future may provide additional insight in this regard.
Interestingly, 2-3 toe syndactyly, a common trait that is also a part of the OFCD syndrome spectrum [
Ng et al., 2004], was present in several of the patient’s family members on the paternal side including her uncle and grandfather, but not her father. The male-to-male transmission from her paternal grandfather to her uncle, however, suggests that the syndactyly is coincidental, representing variable expressivity of an autosomal dominant familial trait, and unrelated to OFCD syndrome.
The manifestation of DMD in the patient is most likely the result of unequal Lyonization in favor of the maternally inherited X-chromosome, a contention supported by the nearly 100% skewing of X-inactivation in lymphocytes, the presence of the
DMD mutation in her mother, and the paucity of dystrophin immunostaining. Skewed X-inactivation has been documented in individuals with OFCD syndrome, with >90% skewing in all cases [
Hedera and Gorski, 2003;
Ng et al., 2004]. Two familial cases with mother to daughter transmission showed preferential inactivation of the maternal chromosomes with the
BCOR mutations [
Hedera and Gorski, 2003;
McGovern et al, 2006]. These observations indicate that the mutations in
BCOR that cause OFCD syndrome are likely to cause a selective disadvantage for cells that express the mutated allele. In the patient reported here, ~100% skewing of X-inactivation occurred in lymphocytes. In contrast to lymphocytes, however, X-inactivation is unlikely to be 100% in all tissues since the patient has many of the characteristic features of OFCD syndrome. Since no
BCOR mutation was identified in the mother, and because observations from published studies indicate that the X chromosome with the
BCOR mutation is strongly inactivated, we reason that the mutation in our patient likely occurred on the paternal X chromosome, and did not occur on the maternal chromosome with the
DMD mutation. As null
BCOR mutations are lethal in hemizygous males, we argue that the mutation occurred during spermatogenesis and that somatic mosaicism in the father is conceivable, but unlikely. Finally, since the hemizygous
BCOR mutation is embryonic lethal while the
DMD mutation is not, and because X inactivation is presumably skewed in favor of the chromosome with the
DMD mutation in our patient, one can reasonably speculate that the skewed
DMD expression is a direct consequence of the
BCOR mutation instead of a chance event as seen in other manifesting DMD females.