PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Semin Nephrol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2818251
NIHMSID: NIHMS151376

Addressing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation: Priorities for Research and Intervention

Abstract

One potential mechanism for reducing racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of kidney transplants is to enhance minorities’ pursuit of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Pursuit of LDKT is influenced by patients’ personal values, their extended social networks, the healthcare system, and the community at large. This review discusses research and interventions promoting LDKT, especially for minorities, including improving education for patients, donors, and providers, utilizing LDKT kidneys more efficiently, and reducing surgical and financial barriers to transplant. Future directions to increase awareness of LDKT for more racial/ethnic minorities are also discussed including developing culturally tailored transplant education, clarifying transplant-eligibility practice guidelines, strengthening partnerships between community kidney providers and transplant centers, and conducting general media campaigns and community outreach.

Keywords: Live Donor Kidney Transplantation, LDKT, disparities in kidney transplantation, kidney transplant barriers

Kidney transplantation represents an optimal therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), offering patients improved survival and quality-of-life at less cost than dialysis.1, 2 However, racial/ethnic minorities with ESRD trail behind Caucasians in their receipt of deceased kidney transplants.1, 2 Research on racial/ethnic disparities in access to kidney transplant has shown that, compared to non-minorities, minorities are less likely to be referred and present for transplant evaluation,3, 4 take longer to complete transplant evaluation,5 are less likely to be placed on the waiting list,6 wait longer for kidney transplantation,7 ascend up the waiting list more slowly,7 are less likely to undergo transplantation, and often suffer worse outcomes post-operatively.3, 8, 9

One potential mechanism for reducing racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of transplants is to enhance minorities’ pursuit of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). LDKT, where a living family member, friend, or another altruistic person donates their kidney to a patient with ESRD, yields better graft survival, lower rates of acute rejection, and improved patient survival10 compared with deceased donor transplantation. Since LDKT does not require potential recipients to be placed on a waiting list, it also bypasses many documented barriers to the receipt of deceased kidney transplants,3, 11 including longer deceased donor transplant waiting times and higher rates of immunological incompatibility.12 LDKT can also occur before ESRD patients require dialysis, a treatment option called preemptive live donor transplantation (PLDT) that is associated with superior clinical outcomes.1315 However, as of 2008, only 30% of living donors are racial/ethnic minorities, only 30% of LDKTs go to non-Caucasian recipients (www.unos.org), and racial/ethnic minorities are significantly less likely to receive PLDTs than Caucasians.16

Social-Ecological Theory Describing LDKT Decision-Making

Utilizing a socio-ecological model as a theoretical framework allows for examination of the influences of patients’ personal values, core family, extended social network, the healthcare system at large, and their community or culture on LDKT decision-making and behavior (Figure 1). Table 1 outlines known barriers to LDKT for racial/ethnic minorities and promising interventions to overcome these barriers for each level of the socio-ecological model.

Figure 1
Social-Ecological Transplant Model
Table 1
Possible Interventions to Overcome LDKT Barriers for Racial Minorities

Patient Level Factors

At the core of the social-ecological model are patient-level factors— how patients think, feel, and make decisions about their illness and LDKT. Patients not pursuing LDKT tend to lack knowledge about the benefits of living donation over remaining on dialysis,17 have concerns about involving and risking a living donor’s health, or fear their own surgical pain and the possibility of the transplanted kidney failing.18, 19 The effect of these factors on pursuit of LDKT among racial/ethnic minorities is likely exacerbated by minorities’ lower socioeconomic status, greater levels of occupational insecurity, and more transient healthcare coverage compared to their Caucasian counterparts.20, 21

Support of LDKT at the patient level varies among racial/ethnic minorities of different cultural backgrounds. For instance, mistrust of healthcare providers is more common for African-Americans than Caucasians,22 which may affect their trust in physician’s recommendations for LDKT and cause suspicion of LKDT.2224 In contrast, Hispanics’ strong sense of familial duty25 may affect their willingness to volunteer to be LDKTs compared with other ethnic groups.26

Family and Social Network Level Factors

At its core, LDKT involves the potential kidney patient and his or her living donor. In addition, family members and friends are involved in supporting these individuals through evaluation, surgery, and recovery. Studies have shown that many patients, especially non-Caucasians and patients without a college degree, feel very uncomfortable talking about LDKT.18, 27, 28 In the case of racial/ethnic minorities, discussion about LDKT also may need to occur with a larger pool of potential living donors, since it may be difficult to find a clinically suitable donor without kidney disease risk factors. This is reinforced by research suggesting that precursors for ESRD may spread through social networks.29 Also, research has shown that African-American women with larger social support networks are more likely to complete pre-transplant evaluation than African-American women with less support.30

Healthcare System Level Factors

Patients interested in LDKT also encounter barriers at every stage of the clinical pathway, including being aware of their medical eligibility, completing transplant evaluation, finding a matching living donor, completing donor and recipient evaluations, and receiving transplants. System level barriers for racial/ethnic minorities include disproportionate access to the option of LDKT, poor LDKT education, and inefficient clinical evaluations and care. Possibly due to variation in their training or subconscious patient stereotyping, health care providers may overemphasize racial/ethnic minority patients’ reluctance to receive transplants or hold biases that racial/ethnic minorities do better on dialysis than non-minorities.8, 31, 32 Their rates of transplant referral may vary because of beliefs that minorities or individuals of low socioeconomic status may be more likely to drop out of evaluation or have less successful transplants.33, 34 Also, some providers have insufficient time to educate patients about LDKT or work in environments with inadequate educational resources.4, 35 One study found that 78% of surveyed dialysis patients reported no or incomplete knowledge about LDKT.36 Cultural or language barriers may also limit providers from being able to truly understand patients’ LDKT preferences.37

Community and Society-Level Factors

Community and society-level factors affecting transplant decision-making include availability of health insurance, government regulations regarding transplantation and organ donation, and cultural values and customs. Persons of low socioeconomic status and without private insurance are less likely to be listed for transplant and less likely to undergo preemptive living donor transplantation, (PLDT).38 Research has shown that over 80% of the general public is supportive of financial incentives like reimbursement for medical costs and paid leave for LDKT, with African-Americans reporting more support for financial incentives than Caucasians.39 Over the past 10 years, state and national legislation has been enacted to reduce the financial burden of LDKT through tax incentives, the provision of paid and unpaid leave, and the reimbursement of direct costs. However, such legislation is not yet associated with any increase in LDKT rates.40

Interventions Addressing Barriers to LDKT

To provide insight for stakeholders seeking to address and overcome racial/ethnic disparities in LDKT, we discuss known LDKT interventions at every level of the socio-ecological model. This review discusses research and interventions promoting LDKT, especially for minorities, including improving education for patients, donors, and providers, utilizing LDKT kidneys more efficiently, and reducing surgical and financial barriers to transplant.

Patient Level Interventions

Improved Dialysis Education about LDKT

Minority and low-income populations are less knowledgeable and receive less education about transplant than other groups.41 At least two group randomized controlled trials have studied whether improved dialysis center LDKT education increases pursuit of transplant and LDKT. Transplant-eligible patients in these studies watched videos sharing recipient and living donor stories, received educational brochures, and had LDKT conversations. In one study, compared to their baseline attitudes, African-Americans, younger patients, and patients who spent less time on dialysis were shown to be significantly more willing to pursue LDKT after receiving education compared to patients in control dialysis centers.42 In a second study, patients in dialysis centers receiving LDKT education were significantly more likely to share education with their support network, make a list of potential living donors, and discuss LDKT with others compared to patients in control dialysis centers. Also, in a subgroup analysis, African-American patients receiving LDKT education were significantly more likely than their Caucasian counterparts to make a list of potential donors and to discuss LDKT with others.43

Improved Education about Preemptive Transplantation

Although educating patients about PLDT also could enable more patients to bypass dialysis entirely,44 it is difficult to locate eligible patients before they reach ESRD. Minority patients generally access health care services less than non-minorities and are more likely to present to nephrologists or the emergency room in full kidney failure.45, 46 Although, currently, there is a paucity of data about promoting PLDT, two randomized controlled trials partnering with community nephrologists and patient advocacy organizations are being conducted to assess the effectiveness of patient educational initiatives on increasing rates of PLDT for minorities. Methods for improving PLDT awareness outside of the clinical setting also should be explored further.

Family and Social Network Interventions

Home-Based Education for Patients and Families

Patients pursuing LDKT want detailed information about the evaluation, surgery, and medical tests required for recipients and donors.47 Several transplant centers have increased LDKT rates by offering formal family education programs and targeting African-Americans.48 However, traditional clinic education about LDKT is often brief, presented early in patients’ decision-making process, and only to those who attend medical appointments. Rodrigue and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial of an educational program where health professionals discussed LDKT with prospective recipients and their support network either in the clinic or their homes. Compared with traditional clinic-based education, significantly more patients in the home-based condition, particularly African-Americans, had living donor inquiries, evaluations, and LDKTs.49, 50 This program allowed more patients and their support networks to learn about LDKT without taking time off work to go to the transplant center and enabled interested potential living donors to volunteer without requiring kidney recipients to ask directly.

Healthcare System Level Interventions

Improving Dialysis Provider Education about LDKT

The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 mandates that patients with advanced kidney dysfunction receive education about all ESRD treatment options, tailored to the specific needs of individual patients and populations. However, dialysis providers may not have received enough education about LDKT themselves to accomplish this task. One study of dialysis providers representing 254 centers in four states revealed that only 41% felt knowledgeable enough to answer patients’ transplant questions, with only 29% of these centers having a formal transplant education program.51 An ongoing trial educating dialysis providers on how to discuss LDKT with their patients is occurring in partnership with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Network 12. The goal of this intervention is to standardize provider knowledge about transplant and increase the availability of patient education for all transplant-eligible dialysis patients. As one of its main outcomes, this study will assess the effect of provider education on reducing racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of LDKT.

Paired Donation and Non-Directed Donation Programs

One-third of willing living donors are ruled out due to blood type or antibody incompatibility with their intended recipients.52 Paired donation programs (where an incompatible donor donates to another recipient so that his/ her intended recipient can receive a kidney from another living donor or the deceased donor pool), and non-directed donation programs (where charitable individuals anonymously donate living donor kidneys to patients on the waiting list) have been developed to efficiently utilize available living donors without matching recipients.53 To date, 398 paired donations, 207 list paired donations, and over 500 non-directed donations have occurred (www.unos.org).

In 2008, a national Kidney Paired Donation pilot program was approved by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to increase living donor access to this option nationally. Although these programs allow more recipients to receive the health benefits of living donor kidneys,5456 concerning trends are being reported where Caucasians and patients of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to participate than other racial groups, possibly creating rather than reducing LDKT disparities. 57

Systematizing Living Donor Care in Transplant Centers

Interventions to standardize education and simplify care for living donors also may help to increase LDKT rates. To reduce confusion, the Living Donor Consensus Group has developed a set of recommendations standardizing what information should be communicated to living donors at transplant centers.58, 59 Growing use of laparoscopic and mini-nephrectomy surgical techniques, which reduce donors’ incisions and shorten recovery times, has been shown to increase LDKT rates.60, 61, 62

Community and Society LDKT Interventions

Reimbursement of Living Donation Expenses for Eligible Donors

In 2007, the National Living Donor Assistance Center (NLDAC) was established to assist individuals with out-of-pocket expenses associated with living donation. For potential living donors who meet specific financial eligibility criteria, the NLDAC provides up to $6000 in reimbursement for the costs of donor evaluation, surgery, and follow-up, including hotel, travel and meal expenses. Currently, over 100 transplant centers have filed NLDAC applications, with over 200 potential living donors receiving funds (NLDAC communication, Katrina Crist, October 1, 2008). With 40% of applicants reporting that they would be unable to afford to donate without NLDAC financial support, this is an important initiative for overcoming financial disincentives to living donation. The effect of the NLDAC program on LDKT rates for racial/ethnic minorities has not yet been assessed.

Future Directions to Overcome Racial/Ethnic Disparities in LDKT

In addition to the intervention approaches discussed, there are many other strategies for reducing racial/ethnic disparities in LDKT that need additional study. Hispanics (41%), African-Americans (25%), and Asian/Pacific Islanders (13%) have suboptimal levels of health literacy compared with Caucasians (9%). Therefore, culturally tailored transplant education approaches must be made available at appropriate reading/literacy levels and in other languages, with the use of live interpreters when appropriate.63, 64 Since many potential living donors first learn about LDKT online,65 information must be made easily available through common search engines. Finally, an exploration of the effectiveness of different strategies for involving patients’ families and social networks in learning about LDKT and locating potential living donors is still needed.

Interventions aimed at the health care system or provider levels, where patients most often receive information, may ultimately reach more racial/ethnic minorities. Strengthening partnerships between community nephrologists and transplant centers may enable more transplant-eligible patients to be identified, educated, and referred. Broad dissemination of clinical practice guidelines outlining which patients are transplant-eligible and when referral for PLDT should occur may help resolve provider uncertainty. Since greater continuity of care is associated with higher levels of patient trust,66 interventions that establish strong and consistent physician-patient relationships may also contribute to higher LDKT rates for minorities.

At the community level, media campaigns and community outreach targeting racial/ethnic minorities may enhance awareness of the need for LDKT.67 Interventions encouraging donor registration through the Registry of Motor Vehicles may have important spill-over effects for LDKT, especially by increasing discussion about the possibility of organ donation within families.

In closing, multiple forums on reducing racial/ethnic disparities recommend linking system improvements to reducing racial disparities, incentivizing reduction of disparities, establishing a diverse healthcare workforce and culturally competent providers, and expanding access to health services and insurance coverage.6870 It is likely that these approaches would impact LDKT rates for racial/ethnic minorities. However, there is also a significant lack of information about how LDKT decisions are made, especially for racial/ethnic minorities. Research that enhances knowledge about the key determinants of decision-making for minority recipients and potential donors and that addresses system and community-level LDKT barriers is still needed to understand the optimal mechanisms through which LDKT disparities can be ameliorated.

Acknowledgments

Support. The National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive Disorders, and Kidney Disease (NIDDK) funds Drs. Waterman (K01DK066239, R01DK079665), Rodrigue (R01DK079665, R21DK077322), and Boulware (K23DK070757, R01DK079682).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

1. Ichikawa Y, Fujisawa M, Hirose E, et al. Quality of life in kidney transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 2000 Nov;32(7):1815–1816. [PubMed]
2. Whiting JF, Kiberd B, Kalo Z, Keown P, Roels L, Kjerulf M. Cost-effectiveness of organ donation: evaluating investment into donor action and other donor initiatives. Am J Transplant. 2004 Apr;4(4):569–573. [PubMed]
3. Alexander GC, Sehgal AR. Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor. Jama. 1998 Oct 7;280(13):1148–1152. [PubMed]
4. Garg PP, Frick KD, Diener-West M, Powe NR. Effect of the ownership of dialysis facilities on patients' survival and referral for transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 25;341(22):1653–1660. [PubMed]
5. Weng FL, Joffe MM, Feldman HI, Mange KC. Rates of completion of the medical evaluation for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Oct;46(4):734–745. [PubMed]
6. Sequist TD, Narva AS, Stiles SK, Karp SK, Cass A, Ayanian JZ. Access to renal transplantation among American Indians and Hispanics. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Aug;44(2):344–352. [PubMed]
7. Sanfilippo FP, Vaughn WK, Peters TG, et al. Factors affecting the waiting time of cadaveric kidney transplant candidates in the United States. JAMA. 1992 Jan 8;267(2):247–252. [PubMed]
8. Held PJ, Pauly MV, Bovbjerg RR, Newmann J, Salvatierra O., Jr Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences? Arch Intern Med. 1988 Dec;148(12):2594–2600. [PubMed]
9. Eggers PW. Racial differences in access to kidney transplantation. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Winter;17(2):89–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. United Network for Organ Sharing. Living Donation : an overview. 2001. www.unos.org.
11. Gaston RS, Ayres I, Dooley LG, Diethelm AG. Racial equity in renal transplantation. The disparate impact of HLA-based allocation. JAMA. 1993 Sep 15;270(11):1352–1356. [PubMed]
12. Young CJ, Gaston RS. Renal transplantation in black Americans. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(21):1545–1552. [PubMed]
13. Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ, et al. Kidney Transplantation as Primary Therapy for End-Stage Renal Disease: A National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) Conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Feb 6; [PubMed]
14. Abou Ayache R, Bridoux F, Pessione F, et al. Preemptive renal transplantation in adults. Transplant Proc. 2005 Jul–Aug;37(6):2817–2818. [PubMed]
15. Grochowiecki T, Szmidt J, Galazka Z, et al. Comparison of 1-year patient and graft survival rates between preemptive and dialysed simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2006 Jan–Feb;38(1):261–262. [PubMed]
16. Butkus DE, Dottes AL, Meydrech EF, Barber WH. Effect of poverty and other socioeconomic variables on renal allograft survival. Transplantation. 2001;72(2):261–266. [PubMed]
17. Waterman AD, Stanley SL, Barrett AC, et al. Knowledge and attitudinal barriers to transplantation for dialysis patients. Vol Chicago, IL: National Kidney Foundation; 2006.
18. Waterman AD, Stanley SL, Covelli T, Hazel E, Hong BA, Brennan DC. Living donation decision making: recipients' concerns and educational needs. Prog Transplant. 2006 Mar;16(1):17–23. [PubMed]
19. Pradel FG, Limcangco MR, Mullins CD, Bartlett ST. Patients' attitudes about living donor transplantation and living donor nephrectomy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Apr;41(4):849–858. [PubMed]
20. Eckhoff DE, Young CJ, Gaston RS, et al. Racial disparities in renal allograft survival: a public health issue? J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):894–902. discussion 902-893. [PubMed]
21. Navaneethan SD, Singh S. A systematic review of barriers in access to renal transplantation among African Americans in the United States. Clinical transplantation. 2006 Nov–Dec;20(6):769–775. [PubMed]
22. Boulware LE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul–Aug;118(4):358–365. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Callender CO, Miles PV. Obstacles to organ donation in ethnic minorities. Pediatr Transplant. 2001;5(6):383–385. [PubMed]
24. Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Cooper LA, Sosa JA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Understanding disparities in donor behavior: race and gender differences in willingness to donate blood and cadaveric organs. Med Care. 2002;40(2):85–95. [PubMed]
25. Warda MR. Mexican Americans' perceptions of culturally competent care. West J Nurs Res. 2000 Mar;22(2):203–224. [PubMed]
26. Dominguez JM, Gonzalez ZA, Morales Otero LA, Torres A, Santiago-Delpin EA. Knowledge and attitude about organ donation in a Hispanic population. Transplant Proc. 1991 Apr;23(2):1804–1806. [PubMed]
27. Lunsford SL, Simpson KS, Chavin KD, et al. Racial differences in coping with the need for kidney transplantation and willingness to ask for live organ donation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Feb;47(2):324–331. [PubMed]
28. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Kaplan B, Howard RJ. Patients' willingness to talk to others about living kidney donation. Prog Transplant. 2008 Mar;18(1):25–31. [PubMed]
29. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):370–379. [PubMed]
30. Clark CR, Hicks LS, Keogh JH, Epstein AM, Ayanian JZ. Promoting access to renal transplantation: the role of social support networks in completing pre-transplant evaluations. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug;23(8):1187–1193. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 2;341(23):1725–1730. [PubMed]
32. Ayanian JZ, Cleary PD, Keogh JH, Noonan SJ, David-Kasdan JA, Epstein AM. Physicians' beliefs about racial differences in referral for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Feb;43(2):350–357. [PubMed]
33. Miskulin D. Case-mix factors explain the survival advantage of Hispanic and racial minority patients on hemodialysis. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2007 Apr;3(4):192–193. [PubMed]
34. Robinson BM, Joffe MM, Pisoni RL, Port FK, Feldman HI. Revisiting survival differences by race and ethnicity among hemodialysis patients: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Oct;17(10):2910–2918. [PubMed]
35. Beasley CL, Hull AR, Rosenthal JT. Living kidney donation: a survey of professional attitudes and practices. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Oct;30(4):549–557. [PubMed]
36. Vianello A, Palminteri G, Brunello A, Calconi G, Maresca MC. Attitudes and knowledge about transplantation in dialyzed patients requesting a cadaveric kidney graft. Clin Nephrol. 2000 Apr;53(4) suppl:64–66. [PubMed]
37. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. Jama. 1999 Aug 11;282(6):583–589. [PubMed]
38. Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Matas AJ, Ellison MD, Gill JS, Kausz AT. Preemptive kidney transplantation: the advantage and the advantaged. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 May;13(5):1358–1364. [PubMed]
39. Boulware LE, Troll MU, Wang NY, Powe NR. Public Attitudes Toward Incentives for Organ Donation: A National Study of Different Racial/Ethnic and Income Groups. Am J Transplant. 2006 Sep 4; [PubMed]
40. Boulware LE, Troll MU, Plantinga LC, Powe NR. The association of state and national legislation with living kidney donation rates in the United States: a national study. Am J Transplant. 2008 Jul;8(7):1451–1470. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. van Ryn M, Fu SS. Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health? Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):248–255. [PubMed]
42. Pradel F, Suwannaprom P, Mullins C, Sadler J, Bartlett S. Short-term impact of an educational program promoting live donor kidney transplantation in dialysis centers. Prog Transplant. 2008 December;14(4):263–272. [PubMed]
43. Waterman A, Hyland S, Stanley SL, Barrett AC, Millinger R. Improving Eduation Increases Dialysis Patients' Pursuit of Transplant: Explore Transplant RCT Findings. Paper presented at: American Transplant Conference; May 30–June 3, 2009; Boston, MA.
44. Hayes R, Waterman AD. Improving preemptive transplant education to increase living donation rates: reaching patients earlier in their disease adjustment process. Prog Transplant. 2008 December;14(4):251–256. [PubMed]
45. Ismail N, Neyra R, Hakim R. The medical and economical advantages of early referral of chronic renal failure patients to renal specialists. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998 Feb;13(2):246–250. [PubMed]
46. Cunningham WE, Mosen DM, Morales LS, Andersen RM, Shapiro MF, Hays RD. Ethnic and racial differences in long-term survival from hospitalization for HIV infection. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2000 May;11(2):163–178. [PubMed]
47. Waterman AD, Barrett AC, Stanley SL. Optimal Transplant Education For Recipients To Increase Pursuit Of Living Donation. Prog Transplant. 2008 March;18(1) 2008. [PubMed]
48. Foster CE, 3rd, Philosophe B, Schweitzer EJ, et al. A decade of experience with renal transplantation in African-Americans. Annals of surgery. 2002 Dec;236(6):794–804. discussion 804–805. [PubMed]
49. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Lin JK, Kaplan B, Howard RJ. Increasing live donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial of a home-based educational intervention. Am J Transplant. 2007 Feb;7(2):394–401. [PubMed]
50. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Kaplan B, Howard RJ. A randomized trial of a home-based educational approach to increase live donor kidney transplantation: effects in blacks and whites. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Apr;51(4):663–670. [PubMed]
51. Waterman A, Goalby C, Hyland S. Dialysis Providers Ability To Educate Patients About Transplant: Good Education Partners?. Paper presented at: American Transplant Conference; May 30–June 3, 2009; Boston, MA.
52. Segev DL, Gentry SE, Warren DS, Reeb B, Montgomery RA. Kidney paired donation and optimizing the use of live donor organs. Jama. 2005 Apr 20;293(15):1883–1890. [PubMed]
53. Gentry SE, Segev DL, Montgomery RA. A comparison of populations served by kidney paired donation and list paired donation. Am J Transplant. 2005 Aug;5(8):1914–1921. [PubMed]
54. Spital A. Evolution of attitudes at U.S. transplant centers toward kidney donation by friends and altruistic strangers. Transplantation. 2000;69(8):1728–1731. [PubMed]
55. Jacobs CL, Roman D, Garvey C, Kahn J, Matas AJ. Twenty-two nondirected kidney donors: an update on a single center's experience. Am J Transplant. 2004 Jul;4(7):1110–1116. [PubMed]
56. Ross LF, Woodle ES. Ethical issues in increasing living kidney donations by expanding kidney paired exchange programs. Transplantation. 2000 Apr 27;69(8):1539–1543. [PubMed]
57. Segev DL, Montgomery RA. Regional and racial disparities in the use of live non-directed kidney donors. Am J Transplant. 2008 May;8(5):1051–1055. [PubMed]
58. Abecassis M, Adams M, Adams P, et al. Consensus statement on the live organ donor. Jama. 2000 Dec 13;284(22):2919–2926. [PubMed]
59. McQuarrie B, Gordon D. Separate, dedicated care teams for living organ donors. Prog Transplant. 2003 Jun;13(2):90–93. [PubMed]
60. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, et al. Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Annals of surgery. 2000 Sep;232(3):392–400. [PubMed]
61. Shenoy S, Lowell JA, Ramachandran V, Jendrisak M. The ideal living donor nephrectomy "mini-nephrectomy" through a posterior transcostal approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Feb;194(2):240–246. [PubMed]
62. Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Oyen O, et al. Postoperative pain and convalescence in living kidney donors-laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jun;6(6):1438–1443. [PubMed]
63. Siegel JT, Alvaro EM, Lac A, Crano WD, Dominick A. Intentions of becoming a living organ donor among Hispanics: a theory-based approach exploring differences between living and nonliving organ donation. J Health Commun. 2008 Jan–Feb;13(1):80–99. [PubMed]
64. Jain N. Kidney Research UK's: a better life through education and empowerment. Br J Community Nurs. 2008 Apr;13(4):166–170. [PubMed]
65. Seto E, Cafazzo JA, Rizo C, Bonert M, Fong E, Chan CT. Internet use by end-stage renal disease patients. Hemodial Int. 2007 Jul;11(3):328–332. [PubMed]
66. Mainous AG, 3rd, Baker R, Love MM, Gray DP, Gill JM. Continuity of care and trust in one's physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. Fam Med. 2001 Jan;33(1):22–27. [PubMed]
67. Callender CO, Hall MB, Branch D. An assessment of the effectiveness of the Mottep model for increasing donation rates and preventing the need for transplantation--adult findings: program years 1998 and 1999. Semin Nephrol. 2001 Jul;21(4):419–428. [PubMed]
68. Kennedy EM. The role of the federal government in eliminating health disparities. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Mar–Apr;24(2):452–458. [PubMed]
69. Randhawa G. The challenge of kidney transplantation among minority ethnic groups in the UK. EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed. 2004;30(4):187, 187. [PubMed]
70. King RK, Green AR, Tan-McGrory A, Donahue EJ, Kimbrough-Sugick J, Betancourt JR. A plan for action: key perspectives from the racial/ethnic disparities strategy forum. Milbank Q. 2008 Jun;86(2):241–272. [PubMed]