PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Trends Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2818156
NIHMSID: NIHMS146549

Can cells and biomaterials in therapeutic medicine be shielded off from innate immune recognition?

Abstract

Biomaterials (e.g. polymers, metals, or ceramics), cell, and cell cluster (e.g. pancreatic islets) transplantation are beginning to offer novel treatment modalities for some otherwise intractable diseases. The innate immune system is involved in incompatibility reactions that occur when biomaterials or cells are introduced into the blood circulation. In particular the complement, coagulation, and contact systems are involved in the recognition of biomaterials and cells, eliciting activation of platelets and leukocytes. Such treatments are associated with anaphylactoid and thrombotic reactions, inflammation, and rejection of biomaterials and cells, leading to treatment failures and adverse reactions. We discuss here the new technologies that are being developed to shield the biomaterial and cell surfaces from recognition by the innate immune system.

Innate immune incompatibilities in medical treatments

Innate immunity is fundamental for the defense against microorganisms and foreign substances, and is part of the basis for discriminating between self- and non-self. A number of different systems exist that contribute to this function of which the complement (Box 1), contact and coagulation systems, NK cells, polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), and monocytes/macrophages represent important components. Cascade systems such as those of complement and coagulation, are in the front line in this defense and are characterized by fast recognition and a powerful amplification. It is therefore natural to find these systems involved in the incompatibility reactions that often occur when alien substances and materials, cells and cell clusters expressing non-self and altered-self structures are introduced in the body using new biotechnological treatment modalities. Procedures involving biomaterial devices, drug delivery systems, viral vectors or cell therapies and cell transplantations, often lead to exposure of biomaterials and cells to whole blood or other body fluids. Treatments with biomaterials have been associated with anaphylactoid and thrombotic reactions, inflammation, and in some cases infection, leading to treatment failures, adverse reactions and prolonged treatment times [13]. New procedures using therapeutic cells have encountered similar problems causing adverse reactions and vast losses of transplanted tissue. The intial phase (recognition) in cell-mediated incompatibility reactions is different but the amplification step is often similar (Figure 1). Therefore, the experience obtained with biomaterials can now be passed on to the cell therapy field.

Box 1Complement activation and regulation

Activation

The complement system has a primary function in innate immunity and host defense by clearing the body of foreign materials and organisms, either by direct lysis or by recruitment of leukocytes that promote phagocytosis. Complement consists of approximately 30 plasma and cellular proteins (receptors and regulators). Its activation takes place in three steps: i) Recognition of altered-self or non-self compounds by three different pathways. The classical pathway (CP) is triggered by antigen-antibody complexes, which bind C1q; the lectin pathway (LP) by binding of mannan-binding lectin (MBL) or ficolins to carbohydrates. The alternative pathway (AP) may be initiated by properdin binding to foreign substances such as microorganisms, or by biomaterials or other surfaces, which do not provide adequate down-regulation of the AP convertase. ii) Initiation of proteolytic activation of C3 into fluid phase C3a and bound C3b by two multi-molecular enzyme complexes called C3 convertases. iii) Amplification loop by the AP, which leads to the vast majority of proteolytic C3 activation. The anaphylatoxins (C3a and C5a) activate and recruit polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and monocytes to the target, while target-bound C3 fragments (C3b and iC3b) facilitate binding to and activation of the recruited cells. The three activation pathways converge into a common pathway forming the membrane attack complex (MAC; termed sC5b-9 in its soluble form) that elicits cell lysis by insertion into the lipid bilayer of cell membranes.

Regulation

The complement system is regulated by multiple soluble and membrane-bound regulatory molecules. Most of these are members of the “regulators of complement activation” (RCA) superfamily that mainly control the two types of convertases. The plasma proteins factor H (a regulator of the AP) and C4b-binding protein (C4BP; a regulator of the CP), and numerous membrane bound proteins (MCP [CD46], DAF [CD55], CR1 [CD35]) all belong to this family. All members of this protein family consist of varying numbers of homologous short consensus repeat (SCR) domains. In addition, CD59 is a regulator of the sC5b-9 complex and C1 inhibitor (C1INH) regulates the C1 complex.

Figure 1
Incompatibility reactions triggered by innate immune responses to altered-self and non-self structures on biomaterials, cells, and cell clusters for therapeutic use. Upon exposure to blood, recognition molecules belonging to different cascade systems ...

Recognition and amplification of innate immune reactons on biomaterials

Most biomaterials used in therapeutic procedures are exposed at some time to blood. This applies to biomaterials in extracorporeal circuits (e.g. hemodialysis), biomaterials implanted into the circulation but also to those implanted into hard and soft tissue (Box 2; Figure 2). Non-biological substances and materials are in general recognized by a mechnism that involves adsorption of plasma proteins to the surface exposed to body fluids or blood. Plasma proteins adsorbed to a biomaterial surface, e.g. a polymer, metal, or ceramic, are conformationally changed and thereby “contact activated”. Examples of such molecules are IgG (which activates the classical pathway of complement; [4]), C3 (which activates the alternative pathway of complement; [5]), fibrinogen (which binds to GPIIb-IIIa on platelets) and Factor XII (FXII) (which triggers contact activation; Figure 1). The effect of this initial protein adsorption is activation of the coagulation, contact, and complement systems. The subsequent complement activation deposits C3 fragments on top of the plasma protein layer [6]. C3 fragment deposition adds a substantial amount of protein to the initially adsorbed protein mass and can, under favorable conditions, totally cover the original protein layer [5]. After activation by thrombin and the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, cells such as platelets, PMNs, and monocytes bind to the protein film on the biomaterial surface.

Box 2Biomaterials

Biomaterials are materials that come in contact with tissues that are used in therapeutic medicine. There are several types of devices that are used: 1) implants in soft and hard tissue; 2) implants in the blood circulation and 3) extracorporeal devices. The first type of implants are used for e.g. in hip replacements, tooth implants, fixation of artificial outer ears etc. Examples of implants in the blood circulation are heart aids, heart valves, blood vessel prostheses etc. The third type of device is equipment used for cardiopulmonary bypass, hemodialysis and plasmapherisis. Typically the substances used for construction of biomaterials consist of metals, cermics, and polymers. Metals are often used in joint and tooth replacements and in other types of bone and cartilige devices. Steel or titanium alloys are commonly used. Ceramics are used as scaffolds for bone generation. Polymers are the most widely materials and consist of a variety of different substances, such as hydrogels, plastics, polysacharides etc. and can be used as scaffolds for vascularization, blood vessel protheses, drug delivery systems, tubing, artifical hearts, extracorporeal circuits etc.

Figure 2
Examples of biomaterials and administered therapeutic cells and cell clusters, that come into direct contact with patient blood. i) During cardiopulmonary bypass, blood is transferred from the patient to an oxygenator where blood gases are exchanged and ...

Adsorbed IgG has been shown to initiate the classical complement pathway on biomaterial surfaces [4] and even though this activation mechanism only deposits minute amounts of C3b on the surface, the deposition is rapid and sufficient to instantaneously trigger the alternative pathway amplification loop. The relative importance of the different activation pathways is illustrated by in vivo studies, which have shown that in patients with C4 deficiency (which lack the classical pathway) undergoing hemodialysis, complement activation is much delayed, but eventually reaches the same amplitude as patients with normal levels of C4. This reflects the fact that regardless of the recognition mechanism, the alternative pathway amplification loop generates the majority of the C3b molecules that bind to the material surface. In vitro studies have confirmed this mechanism and shown that the majority of surface-bound C3 fragments are iC3b covalently bound to the surface-adsorbed plasma proteins [2,6].

Destructive reactions triggered by innate immunity in cell therapies and transplantation

Clinical cell therapies are emerging treatments for a number of conditions, which include islets of Langerhans (for type 1 diabetes) and hepatocyte transplantation (for hepatic insufficiency), treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (to counter graft versus host disease), and various other stem cell therapies (Figure 2). At present, therapeutic cells are mainly of allogeneic origin (i.e. from genetically disparate human donors), but potential future therapies include xenografts and embryonic stem cells. In many cases, therapeutic cells are infused directly into the circulation, thus exposing the cells to whole blood and all the recognition and immune effector mechanisms this contains. Since most of these cells are not only foreign but often also of non-hematological origin they are not protected against the cascade systems in the blood.

Clinical islet transplantation is close to becoming an established procedure for treatment of patients with severe type 1 diabetes but the procedure requires that islets from more than one donor are transplanted to achieve insulin independence [7]. In a study published by Shapiro and colleagues, it was shown that the functional capacity of the transplanted islets from up to 4 donors to one recipient only corresponded to about 20–30% of that in a non-diabetic individual [8]. Together with the immediate destruction seen during transplantation by positron emission tomography, this indicates that only a small fraction of the transplanted islets successfully engraft [9].

We and others have demonstrated that innate immune reactions may be one of the key factors in destroying the islet graft immediately after transplantation [1015]. The innate immune response elicitis a thrombotic and/or inflammatory reaction, which is triggered when islets come into direct contact with blood in the portal vein. This is known as an instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR; Box 3) [16]. The IBMIR is a multi-component reaction that is triggered when non-blood cells come in contact with whole blood. In the case of pancreatic islets, complement is triggered by natural antibodies which are preformed antibodies with specificty to a variety of self- and non-self antigens. This is followed by activation of the coagulation cascade elicited by the protein tissue factor (TF) expressed on the transplanted islet cells. Additional complement activation is triggered by binding of C1q to chondroitin sulfate that is released by activated platelets. The islets are finally infiltrated by PMNs mainly due to MCP-1 expressed by the islet cells. Similar reactions occur when hepatocytes and mesenchymal stem cells are exposed to whole blood [17].

Box 3The instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR)

The IBMIR has similarities with hyperacute rejection (HAR) and ischemia reperfusion in organ transplantation. The IBMIR is a multi-step reaction initially characterized in clinical islet transplantation [1014,16]. Naturally occurring antibodies (IgG, IgM) specific for the transplanted islets trigger complement activation resulting in deposition of components C1q, C4b, C3b and C9 on the islet surface and generation of the fluid-phase activation products C3a and sC5b-9. Leakage of C-peptide (a cleaved product derived from proinsulin) from the islets, was reduced by the C3 inhibitor compstatin [44] demonstrating that the islets are damaged by complement attack [45].

Induction of tissue factor (TF) and other inflammatory genes triggers many of the destructive thrombotic and inflammatory reactions that are associated with the IBMIR. In addition to ischemia after procurement of the organ used for cell preparations, the transition to brain death of the organ donor is known to trigger oxidative stress and upregulation of proinflammatory genes [46,47], e.g. expression of TF [11], and the chemokines MCP-1 [48], IL-8, and MIF [10,49]. TF expression on on the transplanted islets triggers activation of the coagulation cascade and the generated thrombin elicits platelet activation and fibrin formation that traps the infused cells in the blood. Due to platelet activation, additional complement activation occurs secondary to the thrombotic reaction. Melagatran, a thrombin inhibitor, attenuates not only the coagulation activation but also complement activation despite the fact that this inhibitor has no direct effect on complement components [14]. A mechanism by which activated platelets trigger complement activation is via release of chondroitin sulfate [50]. This glucosaminoglycan efficiently binds C1q and activates the classical pathway of complement. Other factors contributing to the damaging effects of the IBMIR are that islets have low expression of complement regulators such as DAF (CD55), MCP (CD46), and to some extent CD59 [45,51]. This absence of regulators explains the pronounced sensitivity of these cells to complement attack. Also, after preparation and isolation of cells for therapeutic use, which often involves digestion of tissue with enzymes such as collagenase, the cells expose extracellular matrix proteins. Many of these e.g. collagen, are themselves prothrombotic and act as ligands for binding of platelets to the cell or cell cluster surfaces.

IBMIR has also been shown to occur in xenogeneic settings when porcine islets are exposed to non-human primates in vivo and to human blood in vitro [18,19]. This type of reaction is, however, more dependent on specific preformed xenogeneic antibodies and complement attack. Future treatment employing human embryonic stem cells (hESC) is likely to mediate similar innate immune reactions since clinical stem-cell therapy is to be performed with immature progenitor cells which e.g. express the ABO antigens [20].

Shielding against innate immune reactions

Principles for protection against innate immune reactions

From the studies mentioned above, it is evident that inhibition of the contact and complement systems and of clotting (activation of the coagulation system and platelets) is of central importance to improving therapeutic procedures using biomaterials and cells. Heparin is widely used in extracorporeal treatments with biomaterial devices, but we have previously shown that soluble heparin, which is used systemically in clinical cell transplantation, is not sufficient to fully inhibit the IBMIR [16]. A number of drugs have been identified as potential inhibitors of innate immunity in connection with cell therapies. These include the thrombin inhibitor melagatran [14], different TF inhibitors [11,21], activated protein C [22], and low molecular weight dextran sulfate [23,24]. Systemic administration of inhibitors of the cascade systems of the blood may be associated with increased risks such as bleeding, infections etc. This is a major drawback, particularly in islet and hepatocyte transplantation since these procedures involve transhepatic puncture of a large branch of the portal vein.

Treatment of biomaterials and cells that gives passive protection against attack by the innate immune system

In order to circumvent the deleterious side effects of systemically administered inhibitors, the biomaterials and cells may instead be pretreated in order to avoid direct contact with selected blood components. The most widely used method is so-called “PEGylation” (polyethylene glycol coating) of the material or cell surface (Figure 3A). PEGylation increases the hydrophilicity of the biomaterial or cell surface and prevents direct adsorption of proteins thereby preventing activation of the cascade systems [25]. When applied to cells, PEGylation has the additional benefit of concealing surface structures which would otherwise trigger the activation of cascade systems.

Figure 3
Different strategies to shield off the surface of biomaterials and cells against innate immune attack. A) Treatment of biomaterials and cells that gives passive protection against innate immune system attack. Left: polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating (green ...

True encapsulation can be achieved by using various kinds of alginate or polysulphone coatings (Figure 3A) [26]. Cells coated in this manner are essentially cut-off from the surrounding environment and protected from both humoral and cellular immunity. Polymerization of PEG creates a thinner capsule around the cells and, in addition to the cascade system inhibition, also acts as a filter preventing cell contact and the passage of molecules [27,28]. A layered membrane can be formed by PEG-lipid layers through polyion complex formation between amino groups at the end of PEG chains, sodium alginate and poly(l-lysine) [29] (Figure 3A). Such ultrathin membranes embedded with the fibrinolytic enzyme urokinase or the anticoagulant heparin were recently described and should result in greater protection of the the cellular graft [30].

The obvious drawback with true encapsulation is deteriorated diffusion of nutrients and oxygen to and from the cells. This is a particular problem with cells in the center of the larger pancreatic islets, which depend on efficient diffusion in order to survive. Despite this, many groups have reported that both allogeneic and xenogeneic encapsulated islets can survive for long periods (months) following implantation into the peritoneal cavity in both small and large animal models, including in non-human primates [31].

Pretreatment of biomaterials and cells that actively prevents cascade system activation

Heparin coatings have been extensively used as a technique to render biomaterials compatible with blood and its complement, contact, and coagulation systems (Figure 3B). Heparin coatings have been successfully applied to biomaterials such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenators and stents [32]. The accepted hypothesis is that this down-regulation of the innate response is achieved solely by binding of regulators of cascade systems, e.g. antithrombin (AT), C1INH, and factor H, since heparin-bound FXII, and C1, and components of the alternative pathway are reported to be regulated by these inhibitors [32,33]. However, we have found that a striking effect of heparin coatings is that they turn potentially cell-binding biomaterial surfaces into surfaces totally devoid of adsorbed host cells and platelets after contact with blood [34] and we therefore partly challenge the established view of the mechanism by which heparin coatings are “inert”. We propose that plasma proteins bind to the highly negatively charged, flexible and freely movable heparin-coated surface through both non-specific and specific charge interactions. This binding does not significantly change the conformation of the adsorbed proteins and therefore they fail to be activated. This is supported by the fact that heparin in most cases does not change the function of plasma proteins when they are removed from protein-heparin complexes. For instance, proteins adsorbed to a non-coated surface, IgG bound by heparin will not interact with Fc receptors or C1q, and C3 will not trigger the alternative pathway.

A novel application of heparin coatings has been developed in our laboratory. By using a biotin-avidin-heparin technique, it has been possible to protect transplanted cells (pancreatic islets) from the innate immune response of the blood [35,36]. In vitro, all signs of the IBMIR triggered by the islet cells were abrogated by this heparin coat. In vivo, visible intraluminal macroscopic clotting was found in the portal vein branches of pigs receiving non-heparinized islets, while only scarce thrombi were found in those receiving heparin-coated islets. In the animals receiving heparinized islets, the increase in thrombin-antithrombin complexes and C3a, and insulin dumping due to cell destruction were attenuated, indicating that the IBMIR was reduced. Thus, the heparin coating creates a cell surface that prevents cascade system activation without increasing the risk of bleeding and, unlike other pre-treatment procedures e.g. gene transduction techniques, without inducing acute or chronic toxicity of the islets. In addition, other cell types can be heparin-coated for instance hepatocytes, mesenchymal stem cells, and endothelial cells.

Binding of regulators of innate immune reactions to biomaterials and cells

We have assessed the ability of a regulator of complement activation (RCA) i.e. factor H, immobilized on a biomaterial surface, to inhibit complement-mediated inflammatory responses (Figure 3C, left). A cross-linker was used to immobilize factor H on a model biomaterial surface without affecting its biological activity. Immobilized factor H reduced the amount C3b and iC3b fragments deposited on the biomaterial surface after incubation with serum, plasma, or whole blood [37]. In addition, lower levels of the soluble activation markers C3a and sC5b-9 were generated after incubation with whole blood. To explore this effect further, we bound pluronic (a class of triblock copolymers consisting of a block of polypropylene oxide surrounded on each side by polyethylene oxide blocks) to polystyrene surfaces [38]. End-group activated Pluronic was used to conjugate factor H to the surface (Figure 3C, middle). Factor H was bound in a physiological conformation and attenuated complement activation on the surface. This created a hybrid surface in which the coagulation-inert properties of the original Pluronic are supplemented with a specific complement-inhibitory effect.

APT070 (a modified fragment of human complement receptor 1) is an example of an RCA that is bound to cell membranes. This regulator contains the three N-terminal short consensus repeats (SCR) of complement receptor 1 (CR1 also known as CD35) modified with a membrane-targeting amphiphilic peptide based on the naturally occurring membrane-bound myristoyl-electrostatic switch peptide [39]. This regulator is currently being applied in kidney transplantation and could also be used in cell therapies [40]. An additional alternative is the newly described fusion proteins consisting of the N-terminal SCRs 1–5 of factor H or DAF (decay accelerating factor), and CR2 (CD21). This creates a molecule which binds specifically to deposited iC3b and C3dg on the material or cell surface and which via the RCA domains inhibits further complement activation [41,42]. Such constructs can be considered for biomaterial and cell surface protection.

Many microorganisms are able to bind the RCA of host complement. For instance, Streptococcus pyogenes express the M-protein which binds C4b-binding protein (C4BP), a regulator for the classical and lectin pathways of complement. We have explored a new concept to construct an auto-regulatory surface to inhibit complement activation triggered by biomaterial surfaces in contact with blood (Figure 3C, right panel) [43]. We coated surfaces with peptides derived from the C4BP-binding region of the streptococcal M-protein. Generation of C3a in the fluid phase and binding of fragments of C3 and C4 to the surface was significantly decreased in serum incubated on surfaces coated with the peptides as a function of their C4BP-binding capacity. Using Streptococcus-derived peptides we could provide proof of principle for the auto-regulatory concept, i.e., that it is feasible to capture complement regulatory molecules from plasma to control autologous complement activation at a model biomaterial surface. This and all of the above mentioned techniques are applicable on cells.

Concluding remarks

The use of biomaterials and cells, and combinations thereof, in therapeutic medicine is becoming increasingly important. Many of these constructs come into direct contact with whole blood whereupon an innate immune response causes inflammation, destruction of implanted cells, and impaired biomaterial performance. Therefore to achieve safer and more efficient therapeutic interventions it will be necessary to engineer both cells and biomaterials that can avoid these adverse reactions. Both passive and active shielding will need to be used in the future to protect bioengineered constructs. Conjugation of biomolecules to biomaterials and cells that can regulate innate immune reactions are promising concepts, which avoids the potential cell-damaging and pro-inflammatory effects of transduction vectors. Medical device technology includes numerous potential applications for cross linkers and spacer molecules that are capable of specifically binding biomolecules to surfaces while retaining their activity. These biomolecules can be RCAs or other innate immunity regulatory molecules. Auto-regulatory compounds capturing endogenous regulators should in the future be constructed as peptides with low molecular weight and immunogenicity. Progress has been achieved with biomaterials with regards to biocompatibility and innate immunity reactions and much of this knowledge can be transferred to the cell therapy field. However, much progress still remains to be made in order to understand the mechanisms by which different transplanted cells trigger innate immune reactions and how these reactions can be attenuated.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr Hans Nilsson for preparing the art-work in Figure 2. This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grants AI068730, EB003968, GM62134, and GM069736, Swedish Research Council Grants 2006-5595 and 15244, a combined grant from Swedish Research Council/Vinnova/Swedish Foundation Strategic Research 6076170, and grants from the Natural Sciences Faculty, University of Kalmar, Sweden.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Gorbet MB, Sefton MV. Biomaterial-associated thrombosis: roles of coagulation factors, complement, platelets and leukocytes. Biomaterials. 2004;25 (26):5681–5703. [PubMed]
2. Nilsson B, et al. The role of complement in biomaterial-induced inflammation. Mol Immunol. 2007;44 (1–3):82–94. [PubMed]
3. Ratner BD. The catastrophe revisited: blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Biomaterials. 2007;28 (34):5144–5147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Tengvall P, et al. Ellipsometric in vitro studies on the activation of complement by human immunoglobulins M and G after adsorption to methylated silicon. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2001;20 (1):51–62. [PubMed]
5. Andersson J, et al. C3 adsorbed to a polymer surface can form an initiating alternative pathway convertase. J Immunol. 2002;168 (11):5786–5791. [PubMed]
6. Andersson J, et al. Binding of C3 fragments on top of adsorbed plasma proteins during complement activation on a model biomaterial surface. Biomaterials. 2005;26 (13):1477–1485. [PubMed]
7. Shapiro AM, et al. Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen. N Engl J Med. 2000;343 (4):230–238. [PubMed]
8. Ryan EA, et al. Clinical outcomes and insulin secretion after islet transplantation with the Edmonton protocol. Diabetes. 2001;50 (4):710–719. [PubMed]
9. Eich T, et al. Visualization of early engraftment in clinical islet transplantation by positron-emission tomography. N Engl J Med. 2007;356 (26):2754–2755. [PubMed]
10. Johansson H, et al. Tissue factor released by the endocrine cells of the islets of Langerhans is associated with a negative outcome of clinical islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2005;54(6):1755–1762. [PubMed]
11. Moberg L, et al. Production of tissue factor by pancreatic islet cells triggers thrombotic reactions detrimental in clinical islet transplantation. Lancet. 2002;360 (9350):2039–2045. [PubMed]
12. Moberg L, et al. Neutrophil granulocytes are the predominant cell type infiltrating the islets in contact with ABO-compatible blood. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;142:125–131. [PubMed]
13. Moberg L, et al. Nicotinamide inhibits tissue factor expression in isolated human pancreatic islets: implications for clinical islet transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;76 (9):1285–1288. [PubMed]
14. Ozmen L, et al. Inhibition of thrombin abrogates the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction triggered by isolated human islets: possible application of the thrombin inhibitor melagatran in clinical islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2002;51 (6):1779–1784. [PubMed]
15. Inverardi L, Ricordi C. Therapeutic approaches to counteract immediate blood-mediated inflammatory reaction in islet transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;82 (3):312–313. [PubMed]
16. Bennet W, et al. Incompatibility between human blood and isolated islets of Langerhans: a finding with implications for clinical intraportal islet transplantation? Diabetes. 1999;48 (10):1907–1914. [PubMed]
17. Stephenne X, et al. Tissue factor-dependent procoagulant activity of isolated human hepatocytes: relevance to liver cell transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13 (4):599–606. [PubMed]
18. Goto M, et al. Dissecting the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction in islet xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2008;15 (4):225–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Kirchhof N, et al. Reversal of diabetes in non-immunosuppressed rhesus macaques by intraportal porcine islet xenografts precedes acute cellular rejection. Xenotransplantation. 2004;11 (5):396–407. [PubMed]
20. Molne J, et al. Blood group ABO antigen expression in human embryonic stem cells and in differentiated hepatocyte- and cardiomyocyte-like cells. Transplantation. 2008;86 (10):1407–1413. [PubMed]
21. Berman DM, et al. Interference with tissue factor prolongs intrahepatic islet allograft survival in a nonhuman primate marginal mass model. Transplantation. 2007;84 (3):308–315. [PubMed]
22. Contreras JL, et al. Activated protein C preserves functional islet mass after intraportal transplantation: a novel link between endothelial cell activation, thrombosis, inflammation, and islet cell death. Diabetes. 2004;53 (11):2804–2814. [PubMed]
23. Johansson H, et al. Low molecular weight dextran sulfate: a strong candidate drug to block IBMIR in clinical islet transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6 (2):305–312. [PubMed]
24. Schmidt P, et al. Low molecular weight dextran sulfate is well tolerated in humans and increases endogenous expression of islet protective hepatocyte growth factor. Transplantation. 2008;86 (11):1523–1530. [PubMed]
25. Contreras JL, et al. A novel approach to xenotransplantation combining surface engineering and genetic modification of isolated adult porcine islets. Surgery. 2004;136 (3):537–547. [PubMed]
26. Beck J, et al. Islet encapsulation: strategies to enhance islet cell functions. Tissue Eng. 2007;13 (3):589–599. [PubMed]
27. Weber LM, et al. PEG-based hydrogels as an in vitro encapsulation platform for testing controlled beta-cell microenvironments. Acta Biomater. 2006;2 (1):1–8. [PubMed]
28. Weber LM, et al. Effects of PEG hydrogel crosslinking density on protein diffusion and encapsulated islet survival and function. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Miura S, et al. Encapsulation of islets with ultra-thin polyion complex membrane through poly(ethylene glycol)-phospholipids anchored to cell membrane. Biomaterials. 2006;27 (34):5828–5835. [PubMed]
30. Teramura Y, Iwata H. Islets surface modification prevents blood-mediated inflammatory responses. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19 (7):1389–1395. [PubMed]
31. Dufrane D, Gianello P. Pig islet xenotransplantation into non-human primate model. Transplantation. 2008;86 (6):753–760. [PubMed]
32. Larsson R. Heparin-binding to improve biocompatibility. Encycl Biomater Biomed Engineering. 2004:753–761.
33. Videm V, et al. Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass equipment. II. Mechanisms for reduced complement activation in vivo. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117 (4):803–809. [PubMed]
34. Hong J, et al. A new in vitro model to study interaction between whole blood and biomaterials. Studies of platelet and coagulation activation and the effect of aspirin. Biomaterials. 1999;20 (7):603–611. [PubMed]
35. Cabric S, et al. Islet surface heparinization prevents the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction in islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2007;56 (8):2008–2015. [PubMed]
36. Cabric S, et al. A new method for incorporating functional heparin onto the surface of islets of Langerhans. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2008;14 (2):141–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Andersson J, et al. Binding of a model regulator of complement activation (RCA) to a biomaterial surface: surface-bound factor H inhibits complement activation. Biomaterials. 2001;22 (17):2435–2443. [PubMed]
38. Andersson J, et al. Surface-attached PEO in the form of activated Pluronic with immobilized factor H reduces both coagulation and complement activation in a whole-blood model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;76 (1):25–34. [PubMed]
39. McLaughlin S, Aderem A. The myristoyl-electrostatic switch: a modulator of reversible protein-membrane interactions. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20 (7):272–276. [PubMed]
40. Patel H, et al. Therapeutic strategy with a membrane-localizing complement regulator to increase the number of usable donor organs after prolonged cold storage. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17 (4):1102–1111. [PubMed]
41. Huang Y, et al. A novel targeted inhibitor of the alternative pathway of complement and its therapeutic application in ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Immunol. 2008;181 (11):8068–8076. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Song H, et al. Complement receptor 2-mediated targeting of complement inhibitors to sites of complement activation. J Clin Invest. 2003;111 (12):1875–1885. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Engberg AE, et al. Inhibition of complement activation on a model biomaterial surface by streptococcal M protein-derived peptides. Biomaterials. 2009;30 (13):2653–2659. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Compstatin: a complement inhibitor on its way to clinical application. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2008;632:273–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Tjernberg J, et al. Acute antibody-mediated complement activation mediates lysis of pancreatic islets cells and may cause tissue loss in clinical islet transplantation. Transplantation. 2008;85 (8):1193–1199. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Contreras JL, et al. Brain death significantly reduces isolated pancreatic islet yields and functionality in vitro and in vivo after transplantation in rats. Diabetes. 2003;52 (12):2935–2942. [PubMed]
47. Pratschke J, et al. What can be learned from brain-death models? Transpl Int. 2005;18 (1):15–21. [PubMed]
48. Piemonti L, et al. Human pancreatic islets produce and secrete MCP-1/CCL2: relevance in human islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2002;51 (1):55–65. [PubMed]
49. Waeber G, et al. Insulin secretion is regulated by the glucose-dependent production of islet beta cell macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94 (9):4782–4787. [PubMed]
50. Hamad OA, et al. Complement activation triggered by chondroitin sulfate released by thrombin receptor-activated platelets. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6 (8):1413–1421. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Bennet W, et al. Expression of complement regulatory proteins on islets of Langerhans: a comparison between human islets and islets isolated from normal and hDAF transgenic pigs. Transplantation. 2001;72 (2):312–319. [PubMed]