1. Anderson JR. Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.
2. Corbett AT, Koedinger KR, Hadley WH. Cognitive Tutors: From the research classroom to all classrooms - Technology Enhanced Learning: Opportunities for Change. 2001
3. VanLehn K. The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Educ. 2006;16(3):227–65.
4. Wenger A. Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems-computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc; 1987.
5. Azevedo R, Lajoie S. The cognitive basis for the design of a mammography interpretation tutor. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 1998;9:32–44.
6. Clancy W. Knowledge-based tutoring: the GUIDON program. J Computer-based Instruct. 1983;10:8–14.
7. Sharples M, Jeffery N, du Boulay B, Teather B, Teather D, du Boulay G. Structured computer-based training in the interpretation of neuroradiological images. Int J Med Inform. 2000;60:263–80. [PubMed]
8. Smith P, Obradovich J, Heintz P, et al. Successful use of an expert system to teach diagnostic reasoning for antibody identification. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems; San Antonio TX. 1998. pp. 354–63.
9. Crowley RS, Medvedeva O. An intelligent tutoring system for visual classification problem solving. Artif Intell Med. 2006 Jan;36(1):85–117. [PubMed]
10. Maries A, Kumar A. The Effect of Student Model on Learning. Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008 ICALT ’08 Eighth IEEE International Conference; 2008. pp. 877–81.
11. Crowley RS, Legowski E, Medvedeva O, Tseytlin E, Roh E, Jukic D. Evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system in pathology: effects of external representation on performance gains, metacognition, and acceptance. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar–Apr;14(2):182–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Saadawi GM, Tseytin E, Legowski E, Jukic D, Castine M, Crowley RS. A natural language intelligent tutoring system for training pathologists: implementation and evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Oct 13; Epub ahead of print.
13. Woo CW, Evens MW, Freedman R, et al. An intelligent tutoring system that generates a natural language dialogue using dynamic multi-level planning. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2006;38(1):25–46. [PubMed]
14. Corbett AT, Anderson JR. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seattle WA: ACM NY; 2001a. Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes; pp. 245–52.
15. Azevedo R, Hadwin AF. Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition-Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds. Instructional Science. 2005b;33:367–79.
16. White B, Frederiksen J. A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development. Educational Psycholoigst. 2005;40(4):211–23.
17. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic Error in Internal Medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1493–99. [PubMed] 18. Voytovich AE, Rippey RM, Suffredini A. Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning. J Med Educ. 1985;60:302–07. [PubMed]
19. Winne PH. Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In: Douglas J, Hacker JD, Arthur C, Graesser S, editors. Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspective. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; 2001. pp. 153–90.
20. Azevedo R, Moos D, Greene J, Winters F, Cromley J. Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development. 2008;56(1):45–72.
21. Zimmerman B. Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In: Ericsson KA, Charness P, Feltovich P, Hoffman R, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. 2006. pp. 705–22.
22. Winne PH, Hadwin AF. Studying as self-regulated learning. In: Douglas J, Hacker JD, Arthur C, Graesser, editors. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Manwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaus Assoc; 1998. pp. 277–304.
23. Winne P, Hadwin A. The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. NY: Taylor & Francis; 2008. pp. 297–314.
24. Azevedo R, Witherspoon AM. Self-regulated learning with hypermedia. In: Graesser A, Dunlosky J, Hacker D, editors. Handbook of metacognition in education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2008. in press.
25. Nelson T, Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In: Bower G, editor. The Pyschology of Learning and Motivation. San Diego CA: Academic Press; 1990.
26. Metcalf J, Dunlosky J. Metamemory. In: Roediger H, editor. Cognitive psychology of memory. Vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier; 2008.
27. Reiser B. Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2004;13(3):273–304.
28. Graesser A, McNamara D, VanLehn K. Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Pint&Query, AuthTutor and iSTRAT. Educational Psychologist. 2005;40(4):225–34.
29. Azevedo R, Cromley JG, Seibert D. Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate student’s ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemp Educ Psych. 2004;29(3):344–70.
30. Green BA. Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educ Technol Rsch & Dev. 2000a;48(1):45–66.
31. Hill JR, Hannafin MJ. Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web. Educational Technology Research and Development. 1997;45(4):37–64.
32. Choi I, Land SM, Turgeon AY. Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science. 2005;33:483–511.
33. Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A. Using web-based pedagogical tools as a scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science. 2005;33:513–40.
34. Puntambekar S, Hubscher R. Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psycholoigst. 2005;40:1–12.
35. Aleven V, Koedinger KR. An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science. 2002;26:147–81.
36. Yudelson MV, Medvedeva O, Legowski E, Castine M, Jukic D, Crowley RS. Mining student learning data to develop high lever pedagogic strategy in a medical ITS. Proceedings: AAAI Educational Data Mining 21st Nat’l Conf, Educ Data Mining Workshop; Boston MA: AAAI press; 2006. pp. 82–90.
37. Yudelson MV, Medvedeva OP, Crowley RS. Multifactor Approach to Student Model Evaluation in a Complex Cognitive Domain. User Model User Adapt. 2008 Sep;18(4):315–82.
38. Pintrich PR, De Groot EV. Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1990;82(1):33–40.
39. Kelemen WL, Frost PJ, Weaver CA., III Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition. 2000;28 (1):92–107. [PubMed] 40. Nelson T. A Comparison of Current Measures of the Accuracy of Feeling-of-Knowing Predictions. Psychological Bulletin. 1984;95(1):109–33. [PubMed] 41. Nikos Mattheos AN, Falk-Nilsson Eva, Attström Rolf. The interactive examination: assessing students’ self-assessment ability. Medical Education. 2004;38(4):378–89. [PubMed]
42. Kulhavy RW, Stock WA. Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review. 1989;1:279–308.
43. Kulhavy RW, Yekovich FR, Dyer JW. Feedback and content review in programmed instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1979;4:91–8.
44. Loboda TD, Brusilovsky P. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Software visualization. Brighton, United Kingdom: ACM; 2006. WADEIn II: adaptive explanatory visualization for expressions evaluation.
45. Mitrovic Antonija, Martin Brent. Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning. 2347/2002. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg; 2002. pp. 296–305.
46. Carver C, Scheier M. Origins and Functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological review. 1990;97:19–35.
47. Azevedo R, Witherspoon AM. Self-regulated use of hypermedia. In: Graesser A, Dunlosky J, Hacker D, editors. Handbook of metacognition in education. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum; in press.
48. Butler D, Winne PH. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of educational research. 1995;65(3):245–81.
49. Winne PH. Minimizing the balck box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science. 1982a;11:13–28.
50. Winne PH, Marx RW. Students’ and teachers’ views of thinking processes for classroom learning. Elemental School Journal. 1982b;82:493–518.
51. Balzer W, Doherty M, O’Conner R. Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin. 1989;106:410–33.