PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2815046
NIHMSID: NIHMS159596

Holoprosencephaly due to Numeric Chromosome Abnormalities

Abstract

Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is the most common malformation of the human forebrain. When a clinician identifies a patient with HPE, a routine chromosome analysis is often the first genetic test sent for laboratory analysis in order to assess for a structural or numerical chromosome anomaly. An abnormality of chromosome number is overall the most frequently identified etiology in a patient with HPE. These abnormalities include trisomy 13, trisomy 18, and triploidy, though several others have been reported. Such chromosome number abnormalities are almost universally fatal early in gestation or in infancy. Clinical features of specific chromosome number abnormalities may be recognized by phenotypic manifestations in addition to the HPE.

Keywords: Holoprosencephaly, HPE, Chromosome Anomalies, Trisomy, Triploidy

INTRODUCTION

In patients with holoprosencephaly (HPE), the first genetic study sent for laboratory testing is almost universally a routine chromosome analysis. Chromosomal anomalies in patients with HPE detectable either by conventional karyotyping or by newer technologies such as microarray can involve virtually any chromosome. Abnormalities of chromosome number are particularly common [Muenke and Beachy, 2001]. Estimates of abnormalities of chromosome number range from 32–41% of patients with HPE [Bullen et al., 2001; Ong et al., 2007; Goetzinger et al., 2008]. Notably, these gross chromosomal anomalies frequently result in a nonviable fetus, and thus tend to be overrepresented in patients ascertained due to anomalies appreciated in utero. However, the vast majority of conceptions with large imbalances such as trisomy or monosomy are not viable and, therefore, the presence of HPE in these conceptions may be underestimated. While survivors with HPE are less likely to have such a large genomic imbalance, laboratory analysis may instead identify milder genomic imbalances or molecularly-detectable mutations in HPE-associated genes.

The purpose of our review is to provide a summary of the knowledge of the chromosomal causes of HPE.

TYPES OF CHROMOSOME NUMBER IMBALANCES

Trisomy 13 accounts for up to 75% of cases of patients with HPE due to all chromosomal anomalies (including cryptic rearrangements) and triploidy for up to 20%, while trisomy 18 is much less commonly seen in conjunction with HPE, and accounts for 1–2% of cases [Ong et al., 2007; Goetzinger et al., 2008]. HPE has also been reported in patients with trisomies other than trisomies 13 and 18, including a small number with trisomy 21 [Lehman et al., 1995; Bullen et al., 2001; Papp et al., 2006; Ong et al., 2007; Goetzinger et al., 2008]. While aberrant signaling related to abnormal copy numbers of HPE-related genes located on some of these chromosomes may plausibly result in HPE, some of these cases, such as those involving patients with trisomy 21 and HPE, may be coincident [Epstein et al., 1988].

Clearly, HPE is a common feature of trisomy 13. HPE has been reported in 17–39% of patients with trisomy 13 [Lehman et al., 1995; Papp et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2007]. While HPE due to trisomy 13 is often detected prenatally by ultrasound, this technique is obviously not as sensitive as pathologic examination. When pathological examination is performed about 67% of patients with trisomy 13 have signs of forebrain anomalies consistent with HPE [Moerman et al., 1988].

Prenatally-detected central nervous system (CNS) malformations appreciable on ultrasound are strongly associated with and predictive of chromosomal abnormalities, especially trisomies 13 and 18. In addition to HPE, many other types of CNS malformations may be observed. In one large review of patients with trisomies 13, 18, and 21, of the many types of possible neurological anomalies, when isolated, only HPE, spina bifida, and agenesis of the corpus callosum were significantly associated with trisomy 13, while anencephaly was significantly associated with trisomy 18 [Goetzinger et al., 2008]. As detailed below, the presence of ZIC2 on chromosome 13 and the association of this gene with both HPE and HPE-spectrum anomalies (which include corpus callosal agenesis), along with an increased frequency of neural tube defects seen with abnormalities chromosome 13, warrants further investigation [Ballarati et al., 2007].

Importantly, other anomalies in addition to neurological and facial features consistent with HPE are found in all fetuses with chromosome number anomalies [Bullen et al., 2001; Bekdache et al., 2009]. Thus, the presence of multisystem organ anomalies and other features in addition to facial and neurological abnormalities are a clue that frank cytogenetic abnormalities are causative.

BIOLOGIC AND RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS

A clear biological mechanism by which abnormalities of chromosome number can cause HPE has not been delineated, but it is intriguing that ZIC2 and TGIF are located at chromosomes 13q32 and 18p11.2, respectively, and that aberrant (admittedly, loss-of-function) signaling involving these genes are among the relatively common causes of human HPE [Roessler et al., 2009, El-Jaick et al., 2007]. Multiple interacting factors located on these chromosomes likely play a role in forebrain formation, and large-scale copy number changes involving more than a single gene could interrupt key signaling pathways.

There are rare cases of (mosaic) trisomy 9 in patients with HPE [Gerard-Blanluet et al., 2002]. Interestingly, HPE-causing mutations in the PTCH1 gene, located at 9q22.3, are thought to result in HPE by a gain-of-function mechanism affecting Sonic Hedgehog signaling (PTCH1 normally acts to repress SHH signaling) [Ming et al., 2002]. Trisomies and triploidy, which result in large copy-number gains, could overall repress integral signaling pathways, such as SHH, necessary for normal forebrain development.

COUNSELING ISSUES

Both trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 are associated with advanced maternal age [Crider et al., 2008]. Triploidy presents a more complex and controversial situation with respect to mechanism and parental origin [Zaragoza et al., 2000; McFadden and Langlois, 2000]. While advanced maternal age is generally not considered to be a major factor, it may play a role in some cases of triploids, presumably only digynic ones [McFadden and Langlois, 2000; Forrester and Merz, 2003]. A combination of sonographic and maternal serum testing can screen for trisomy 13 and 18. Triploidy may be detected by maternal serum screening, although the scope of sonographically detectable fetal anomalies in triploidy can be quite variable depending upon whether the extra set of chromosomes was inherited from the mother or the father. As outlined in the Table, all conditions have a reduced survival rate outside of the immediate neonatal period, though advances in neonatal care may prolong survival. It is critical that families are appropriately counseled regarding prognostic implications. The association of triploidy with molar pregnancies raises additional counseling implications regarding maternal health [Bekdache et al., 2009].

Table I
Features of conditions of numeric chromosome abnormalities which are associated with HPEa.

Most cases of abnormalities of chromosome number are isolated occurrences. However, recurrent cases have been reported, including triploidy [Brancati et al., 2003]. Overall, the recurrence risk of HPE due to cytogenetic anomalies is estimated at 1% [Peebles, 1998].

DISCUSSION

Chromosome number anomalies are relatively common causes of HPE. As the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of HPE increases, coupled with the advancement of new testing modalities, new diagnostic tests continue to become available. This growing complexity can complicate diagnostic decision-making for clinicians encountering patients with disorders such as HPE. However, it is important to remember that chromosome analysis, one of the older diagnostic tests, is still the most efficient, highest-yield, and most affordable first option for most scenarios when a clinician encounters a patient with HPE, whether it be in the obstetric, neonatal, or pediatric setting. In fact, before other specific molecular diagnoses are entertained, it is important to exclude cytogenetic abnormalities especially anomalies of chromosome number 13 and 18.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health and Human Services, United States of America.

Biographies

• 

Benjamin D. Solomon is a fellow in the Combined Pediatrics and Medical Genetics Residency Program, based at the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. He is involved in research on holoprosencephaly and VACTERL association.

• 

Kenneth Rosenbaum is a member of the Division of Genetics and Metabolism at Children’s National Medical Center and an Associate Professor of Pediatrics at George Washington University School of Medicine. His research interests include dysmorphic syndromes and prenatal diagnosis of malformations.

• 

Jeanne Meck is a board certified Clinical Cytogeneticist and a Technical Director of Cytogenetics at Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute in Chantilly, VA, USA. She is also a Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Georgetown University Medical Center. Her professional interests include constitutional and cancer cytogenetics, molecular cytogenetics, and genetics education.

• 

Maximilian Muenke is chief of the Medical Genetics Branch at the Division of Intramural Research in the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. He has a longstanding interest in elucidating the genetics behind holoprosencephaly, craniofacial malformation syndromes, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, as well as an interest in improving knowledge about the formation of the central nervous system.

References

  • Ballarati L, Rossi E, Bonati MT, Gimelli S, Maraschio P, Finelli P, Giglio S, Lapi E, Bedeschi MF, Guerneri S, Arrigo G, Patricelli MG, Mattina T, Guzzardi O, Pecile V, Police A, Scarano G, Larizza L, Zuffardi O, Giardino D. 13q Deletion and central nervous system anomalies: further insights from karyotype-phenotype analyses of 14 patients. J Med Genet. 2007;44:e60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bekdache GN, Begam M, Al Safi W, Mirghani H. Prenatal diagnosis of triploidy associated with holoprosencephaly: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:479–483. [PubMed]
  • Brancati F, Mingarelli R, Dallapiccola B. Recurrent triploidy of maternal origin. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003;11:972–974. [PubMed]
  • Bullen PJ, Rankin JM, Robson SC. Investigation of the epidemiology and prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly in the North of England. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1256–1262. [PubMed]
  • Carey JC. Trisomy 18 and 13 syndromes. In: Cassidy SB, Allanson J, editors. Management of Genetic Syndromes. Wiley; Newark, NJ: 2005.
  • Cragan JD, Gilboa SM. Including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring: Experience of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85:20–29. [PubMed]
  • Crider KS, Olney RS, Cragan JD. Trisomies 13 and 18: population prevalences, characteristics, and prenatal diagnosis, metropolitan Atlanta, 1994–2003. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146:820–826. [PubMed]
  • El-Jaick KB, Powers SE, Bartholin L, Myers KR, Hahn J, Orioli IM, Ouspenskaia M, Lacbawan F, Roessler E, Wotton D, Muenke M. Functional analysis of mutationsin TGIF associated with holoprosencephaly. Mol Genet Metab. 2007;90:97–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Epstein CJ, Seto S, Golabi M. Chance vs. causality in the association of Down syndrome and holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet. 1988;30:939–942. [PubMed]
  • Forrester MB, Merz RD. Epidemiology of triploidy in a population-based birth defects registry, Hawaii, 1986–1999. Am J Med Genet A. 2003;119A:319–23. [PubMed]
  • Gérard-Blanluet M, Danan C, Sinico M, Lelong F, Borghi E, Dassieu G, Janaud JC, Odent S, Encha-Razavi F. Mosaic trisomy 9 and lobar holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet. 2002;111:295–300. [PubMed]
  • Goetzinger KR, Stamilio DM, Dicke JM, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Evaluating the incidence and likelihood ratios for chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with common central nervous system malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:285.e1–6. [PubMed]
  • Jones KL. Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation. United States: Elsevier-Saunders; 2006. pp. 13–21.pp. 28–31.
  • Lehman CD, Nyberg DA, Winter TC, 3rd, Kapur RP, Resta RG, Luthy DA. Trisomy 13 syndrome: prenatal US findings in a review of 33 cases. Radiology. 1995:217–222. [PubMed]
  • Lin HY, Lin SP, Chen YJ, Hsu CH, Kao HA, Chen MR, Hung HY, Ho CS, Chang JH, Huang FY, Tsai TC, Lin DS, Chan WT. Clinical characteristics and survival of trisomy 13 in a medical center in Taiwan, 1985–2004. Pediatr Int. 2007;49:380–386. [PubMed]
  • McFadden DE, Langlois S. Parental and meiotic origin of triploidy in the embryonic and fetal periods. Clin Genet. 2000;58:192–200. [PubMed]
  • Ming JE, Kaupas ME, Roessler E, Brunner HG, Golabi M, Tekin M, Stratton RF, Sujansky E, Bale SJ, Muenke M. Mutations in PATCHED-1, the receptor for SONIC HEDGEHOG, are associated with holoprosencephaly. Hum Genet. 2002;110:297–301. [PubMed]
  • Moerman P, Fryns JP, van der Steen K, Kleczkowska A, Lauweryns J. The pathology of trisomy 13 syndrome. A study of 12 cases. Hum Genet. 1988;80:349–356. [PubMed]
  • Muenke M, Beachy PA. Holoprosencephaly. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The Metabolic & Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 8. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp. 6203–6230.
  • Ong S, Tonks A, Woodward ER, Wyldes MP, Kilby MD. Prenat Diagn. 2007. An epidemiological study of holoprosencephaly from a regional congenital anomaly register: 1995–2004; pp. 340–347. [PubMed]
  • Papp C, Beke A, Ban Z, Szigeti Z, Toth-Pal E, Papp Z. Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13: analysis of 28 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:429–435. [PubMed]
  • Peebles DM. Holoprosencephaly. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:477–80. [PubMed]
  • Roessler E, Lacbawan F, Dubourg C, Paulussen A, Herbergs J, Hehr U, Bendavid C, Zhou N, Ouspenskaia M, Bale S, Odent S, David V, Muenke M. The full spectrum of holoprosencephaly-associated mutations within the ZIC2 gene in humans predicts loss-of-function as the predominant disease mechanism. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:E541–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zaragoza MV, Surti U, Redline RW, Millie E, Chakravarti A, Hassold TJ. Parental origin and penotype of triploidy in spontaneous abortions: predominance of diandry and association with the partial hydatidiform mole. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1807–1820. [PubMed]