1. Anderson JG. Clearing the way for physicians’ use of clinical information systems. Commun ACM. 1997;40:83–90.
2. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K, DesRoches C, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff. 2006;25:w496–w507. [PubMed] 3. Poon EG, Jha AK, Christino M, Honour MM, Fernandopulle R, Middleton B, et al. Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: A snapshot. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2006 [PMC free article] [PubMed] 4. Lorenzi NM, Novak LL, Weiss JB, Gadd CS, Unertl KM. Crossing the implementation chasm: A proposal for bold action. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:290–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 5. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:104–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 6. Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RSB, Watson RS, Nguyen TC, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1506–12. [PubMed] 7. Koppel R, Leonard CE, Localio AR, Cohen A, Auten R, Strom BL. Identifying and quantifying medication errors: Evaluation of rapidly discontinued medication orders submitted to a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:461–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 8. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293:1197–203. [PubMed] 9. McDonald CJ. Computerization can create safety hazards: A barcoding near miss. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:510–6. [PubMed] 10. Nebeker JR, Hoffman JM, Weir CR, Bennett CL, Hurdle JF. High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1111–6. [PubMed] 11. Rothschild JM, Keohane CA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, Burdick E, Thompson S, et al. A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:533–40. [PubMed]
12. Thompson DA, Duling L, Holzmueller CG, Dorman T, Lubomski LH, Dickman F, et al. Computerized physician order entry, a factor in medication errors: Descriptive analysis of events in the intensive care unit safety reporting system. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2005;12:407–12.
13. Wears RL, Cook RI, Perry SJ. Automation, interaction, complexity, and failure: A case study. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2006;91:1494–501.
14. Lapointe L, Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly. 2005;29:461–91.
15. Markus ML. Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Commun ACM. 1983;26:430–44.
16. Zuboff S. In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books; New York: 1988.
17. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Managing change: An overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:116–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Smith MJ, Carayon P. New technology, automation, and work organization: stress problems and improved technology implementation strategies. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing. 1995;5:99–116.
19. Lærum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A. Doctors’ use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: Cross sectional survey. Br Med J. 2001;323:1344–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 20. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: Myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64:143–56. [PubMed] 21. Holden RJ, Karsh B. A review of medical error reporting system design considerations and a proposed cross-level system research framework. Human Factors. 2007;49:257–76. [PubMed] 22. Lapointe L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: Insights from case studies. CMAJ. 2006;174:1573–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 23. Patterson ES, Rogers ML, Chapman RJ, Render ML. Compliance with intended use of bar code medication administration in acute and long-term care: An observational study. Human Factors. 2006;48:15–22. [PubMed] 24. Lawler F, Cacy JR, Viviani N, Hamm RM, Cobb SW. Implementation and termination of a computerized medical information system. J Fam Pract. 1996;42:233–6. [PubMed] 25. Koppel R, Wetterneck TB, Telles JL, Karsh B. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: Their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:408–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 26. Weingart SN, Toth M, Sands DZ, Aronson MD, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Physicians’ decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2625–31. [PubMed] 27. Dowling AF., Jr. Do hospital staff interfere with computer system implementation? Health Care Manage Rev. 1980;5:23–32. [PubMed]
28. Holden RJ, Karsh B. A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behav Inf Technol. 2009;28:21–38.
29. Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Orav EJ, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: A statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:507–12. [PubMed] 30. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:650–72. [PubMed]
31. Karsh B, Holden RJ. New technology implementation in health care. In: Carayon P, editor. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Patient Safety. Lawrence Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ: 2007. pp. 391–408.
32. Hu PJH, Chau PYK, Sheng ORL, Tam KY. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1999;16:91–112.
33. Bagozzi RP. The legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2007;8:244–54.
34. Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the American Informatics Society. 2003;12:752–80.
35. Ma Q, Liu L. The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 2004;16:59–72.
36. Yousafzai SY, Foxall GR, Pallister JG. Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 2. Journal of Modelling in Management. 2007;2:281–304.
37. King WR, He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 2006;43:740–55.
38. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 2003;40:191–204.
39. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13:319–39.
40. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of 2 theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35:982–1003.
41. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley; Reading, MA: 1975.
42. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1980.
43. Davis FD. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results [Doctoral dissertation] Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cambridge, MA: 1986.
44. Mathieson K. Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research. 1991;2:173–91.
45. Sjana B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manage Sci. 1996;42:85–92.
46. Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, Burkman JR. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems. 2002;11:283–95.
47. Ives B, Olson MH, Baroudi JJ. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Commun ACM. 1983;26:785–93.
48. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences. 2001;32:699–719.
49. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2002;18:191–229.
50. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46:186–204.
51. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27:425–78.
52. Taylor S, Todd P. Assessing IT usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research. 1995;6:144–76.
53. Ajzen I, Driver BL. Prediction of leisure participation from behavioural, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Leisure Sciences. 1991;13:185–204.
54. Yousafzai SY, Foxall GR, Pallister JG. Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modelling in Management. 2007;2:251–80.
55. Benbasat I, Barki H. Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2007;8:211–8.
56. Karsh B. Beyond usability for patient safety: designing effective technology implementation systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:388–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 57. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2006 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Hennington AH, Janz BD. Information systems and healthcare XVI: Physician adoption of electronic medical records: Applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2007;19:60–80.
59. Despont-Gros C, Mueller H, Lovis C. Evaluating user interactions with clinical information systems: A model based on human—computer interaction models. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:244–55. [PubMed] 60. Kukafka R, Johnson SB, Linfante A, Allegrante JP. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: A systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36:218–27. [PubMed]
61. Succi MJ, Walter ZD. Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: An examination of health care professionals. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 1999.pp. 1–7.
62. Dixon DR. The behavioral side of information technology. Int J Med Inform. 1999;56:117–23. [PubMed]
63. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed Free Press; New York: 1995.
64. Chang P, Hsu Y-S, Tzeng Y-M, Hou I-C, Sang Y-Y. Development and pilot evaluation of user acceptance of advanced mass-gathering emergency medical services PDA support systems. Medinfo. 2004;11:1421–5. [PubMed] 65. Chang P, Hsu Y-S, Tzeng Y-M, Sang Y-Y, Hou I-C, Kao W-F. The development of intelligent, triage-based, mass-gathering emergency medical service PDA support systems. J Nurs Res. 2004;12:227–35. [PubMed]
66. Chang P, Tzeng Y-M, Wu S-C, Sang Y-Y, Chen S-S. Development and comparison of user acceptance of advanced comprehensive triage PDA support system with a traditional terminal alternative system. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association; 2003.pp. 140–4.
67. Handy J, Hunter I, Whiddett R. User acceptance of inter-organizational electronic medical records. Health Informatics J. 2001;7:103–7.
68. Dillon TW, McDowell D, Salimian F, Conklin D. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedeside-computer systems. Computers in Nursing. 1998;16:151–6. [PubMed] 69. Sheng ORL, Hu PJH, Chau PYK, Hjelm NM, Tam KY, Wei C-P, et al. A survey of physicians’ acceptance of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4:100–2. [PubMed]
70. Van Schaik P, Flynn D, Wersch AV, Douglass A, Cann P. The acceptance of a computerised decision-support system in primary care: A preliminary investigation. Behav Inf Technol. 2004;23:321–6.
71. Dixon DR, Stewart M. Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: Survey instrument validation. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium; 2000.pp. 185–9.
72. Karsh B, Escoto KH, Beasley JW, Holden RJ. Toward a theoretical approach to medical error reporting system research and design. Appl Ergon. 2006;37:283–95. [PubMed] 73. Day M, Demiris G, Oliver DP, Courtney K, Hensel B. Exploring underutilization of videophones in hospice settings. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:25–31. [PubMed] 74. Gaggioli A, di Carlo S, Mantovani F, Castelnuovo G, Riva G. A telemedicine survey among Milan doctors. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2005;11:29–34. [PubMed] 75. Lai TYY, Leung GM, Wong IOL, Johnston JM. Do doctors act on their self-reported intention to computerize? A follow-up population-based survey in Hong Kong. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73:415–31. [PubMed] 76. Gagnon MP, Godin G, Gagne C, Fortin JP, Lamothe L, Reinharz D, et al. An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int J Med Inform. 2003;71:103–15. [PubMed] 77. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstädter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: Results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:69–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Holden RJ, Scanlon MC, Brown RL, Karsh B. What is IT? New conceptualizations and measures of pediatric nurses’ acceptance of car-coded medication administration information technology. Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2008;52:768–72.
79. Croteau A-M, Vieru D. Telemedicine adoption by different groups of physicians. 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2002.2002.
82. Tung F-C, Chang S-C. A new hybrid model for exploring the adoption of online nursing courses. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28:293–300. [PubMed]
83. Tung F-C, Chang S-C. Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. in press.
84. Chen IJ, Yang K-F, Tang F-I, Huang C-H, Yu S. Applying the technology acceptance model to explore public health nurses’ intentions towards web-based learning: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:869–78. [PubMed]
85. Rutkowski A-F, Spanjers RWL. Optimising e-learning in healthcare for nurses. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management. 2007;8:354–69.
86. Hulse NC, Del Fiol G, Rocha RA. Modeling end-users’ acceptance of a knowledge authoring tool. Methods Inf Med. 2006;45:528–35. [PubMed] 87. Wu J-H, Shen W-S, Lin L-M, Greenes RA, Bates DW. Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals’ intention to use an adverse event reporting system. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20:123–9. [PubMed] 88. Kim D, Chang H. Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: an application of the extended technology acceptance model. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:790–800. [PubMed]
89. Klein R. An empirical examination of patient-physician portal acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems. 2007;16:751–60.
90. Lanseng EJ, Andreassen TW. Electronic healthcare: A study of people’s readiness and attitude toward performing self-diagnosis. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 2007;18:394–417.
91. Zhang W, Gutierrez O. Information technology acceptance in the social services sector context: An exploration. Soc Work. 2007;52:221–31. [PubMed]
92. Fisher ME. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to measure pediatrician acceptance of practice management information systems [Doctoral dissertation] Nova Southeastern University; Fort Lauderdale-Davie, FL: 2002.
93. Berlin A, Sorani M, Sim I. A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems. J Biomed Inform. 2006;39:656–67. [PubMed] 94. Door D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, Shoair RS, Perrin R, Chaney E, et al. Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: A literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:156–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 95. Hu PJH, Chau PYK. Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: An empirical investigation. Topics in Health Information Management. 1999;19:20–35. [PubMed] 96. Barker DJ, van Schaik P, Simpson DS, Corbett WA. Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination. Med Inform Internet Med. 2003;28:85–97. [PubMed]
97. Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S. Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association; 2002.pp. 155–9.
98. Horan TA, Tulu B, Hilton B, Burton J. Use of online systems in clinical medical assessments: An analysis of physician acceptance of online disability evaluation systems. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2004.pp. 1–10.
99. Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management. 2006;43:350–63.
100. Han S, Mustonen P, Seppänen M, Kallio M. Does fragmenting of working time and working space influence the acceptance of mobile technology? A case of Finnish physicians: Turku Centre for Computer Science. 2005
101. Paré G, Sicotte C, Jacques H. The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:197–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
102. Rawstorne P, Jayasuriya R, Caputi P. Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior when usage is mandatory. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems; 2000.pp. 35–44.
103. Tung F-C, Chang S-C, Chou C-M. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:324–35. [PubMed]
104. Van Schaik P, Bettany-Saltikov JAB, Warren JG. Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. Behav Inf Technol. 2002;21:47–57.
105. Schaper LK, Pervan GP. ICTs & OTs: A model of information and communications technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists (part 2) Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;130:91–101. [PubMed]
106. Liang H, Xue Y, Byrd TA. PDA usage in healthcare professionals: Testing an extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Mobile Communications. 2003;1:372–89.
107. Liu L, Ma Q. Perceived system performance: A test of an extended Technology Acceptance Model. Database for Advances in Information Systems. 2006;37:51–9.
108. Duyck P, Pynoo B, Devolder P, Voet T, Adang L, Vercruysse J. User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system. Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in a radiological setting. Methods Inf Med. 2008;47:149–56. [PubMed] 109. Wu J-H, Wang S-C, Lin L-M. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:66–77. [PubMed] 110. Chen CC, Wu J, Crandall RE. Obstacles to the adoption of radio frequency identification technology in the emergency rooms of hospitals. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare. 2007;3:193–207. [PubMed] 111. Schaper LK, Pervan GP. ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:S212–S21. [PubMed]
112. Liu L, Ma Q. The impact of service level on the acceptance of application service oriented medical records. Information & Management. 2005;42:1121–35.
113. RAND Corporation Health Information Technology: Can HIT Lower Costs and Improve Quality? 2005.
114. Chaudhry B, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, et al. Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:E12–E22. [PubMed]
115. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB. Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD: 2006. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 132.
116. Karsh B, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, Or CKL. A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety — designing to support the performance of the health care professional. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:i59–i65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
117. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press; Boston: 1993.
118. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1986.
119. Kelman HC. Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three process of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1958;2:51–60.
120. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32:665–83.
121. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Distinguishing peceptions of control from self-efficacy: Predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1999;29:72–90.
122. Ajzen I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:27–58. [PubMed] 123. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 1999;55:87–101. [PubMed] 124. Berg M, Aarts J, Van Der Lei J. ICT in health care: Sociotechnical approaches. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:297–301. [PubMed] 125. Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:94–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
126. Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly. 1992;16:227–47.
127. Sun H, Zhang P. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int J Hum-Comput Stud. 2006;64:53–78.
128. Agarwal R, Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences. 1997;28:557–82.
129. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2003;19(4):9–30.
130. Chiasson MW, Davidson E. Pushing the contextual envelope: Developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research. Information and Organization. 2004;14:155–88.
131. Goodhue DL. Comment on Benbasat and Barki’s “Quo Vadis TAM” article. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2007;8:219–22.
132. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly. 1995;19:213–36.
133. Ludwig DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 2008 doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.005.
134. Karsh B, Holden RJ, Escoto KH, Alper SJ, Scanlon MC, Arnold J, et al. Do beliefs about hospital technologies predict nurses’ perceptions of quality of care? A study of task-technology fit in two pediatric hospitals. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2009;25:374–89.
135. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications—some alternative approaches: Theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64:39–56. [PubMed]
136. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research. 1991;2:192–221.
137. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research. 2000;11:342–65.
138. Langdridge D, Sheeran P, Connolly KJ. Analyzing additional variables in the Theory of Reasoned Action. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;37:1884–913.
139. Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28:1429–64.
140. Gammon D, Johannessen LK, Sørensen T, Wynn R, Whitten P. An overview and analysis of theories employed in telemedicine studies. Methods of Information in Medicine. 2008;47:260–9. [PubMed] 141. Zaidi STR, Marriott JL, Nation RL. The role of perceptions of clinicians in their adoption of a web-based antibiotic approval system: Do perceptions translate into actions? Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:33–40. [PubMed]
142. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, et al. Constructing questionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle; Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: 2004.
143. Darker CD, French DP, Longdon S, Morris K, Eves FF. Are beliefs elicited biased by question order? A theory of planned behaviour belief elicitation study about walking in the UK general population. Br J Health Psychol. 2007;12:93–110. [PubMed]
144. Sutton S, French DP, Hennings SJ, Mitchell J, Wareham NJ, Griffin S, et al. Eliciting salient beliefs in research on the theory of planned behaviour: The effect of question wording. Curr Psychol. 2003;22:234–51.
145. Downs DS, Hausenblas HA. Elicitation studies and the theory of planned behavior: A systematic review of exercise beliefs. Psychology of Sports & Exercise. 2005;6:1–31.
147. Fishbein M. A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In: Fishbein M, editor. Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. John Wiley; New York: 1967. pp. 389–400.
148. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes. Wadsworth; Belmont, CA: 1993.
149. Stead WW, Lin HS, editors. Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. National Academies Press; Washington, D.C.: 2009.
150. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:115–26. [PubMed] 151. Kijsanayotin B, Pannarunothai S, Speedie SM. Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand’s community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:404–16. [PubMed] 152. Lishan X, Chiuan YC, Choolani M, Chuan CH. The perception and intention to adopt female-focused healthcare applications (FHA): A comparison between healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:248–58. [PubMed] 153. McDowell DE, Dillon TW, Lending D. Perceived quality benefits influenced by usefulness and documentation accuracy of information systems. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2008;26:350–7. [PubMed]
154. Tao D. Understanding intention to use electronic information resources: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium; 2008.pp. 717–21.
155. Yu P, Li H, Gagnon M-P. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:219–29. [PubMed]
156. Hyun S, Johnson SB, Stetson PD, Bakken S. Development and evaluation of nursing user interface screens using multiple methods. J Biomed Inform. in press.
157. Huser V, Narus SP, Rocha RA. Evaluation of a flowchart-based EHR query system: A case study of RetroGuide. J Biomed Inform. in press.
158. Whitten P, Holtz B, Meyer E, Nazione S. Telehospice: reasons for slow adoption in home hospice care. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15:187–90. [PubMed]